Document DGK3Q4vJKovN8vBw34pBBMBBN

BOELTER_____________________ ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Corporate Office O'Hire Corporate Center 1300 Htggtra Road Suite 301 Park Ridge. IL 60068-5772 _ 547 ' 692-4700 FAX 847 . o92-3127 Regional Office Chicago FIBER RELEASE STUDY INDUSTRIAL FITTINGS VALVE PACKING REMOVAL November 19,1996 BAI Project #1418A-4602 TABLE OF CONTENTS CMCNJCNJCMCMCOCOCOCO^T U) U) U) U) (O N EASE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................. 1 Objectives .................................................................................................... .. 1 Background ........................................................................................................... 1 Sample Results ..................................................................................................... 1 METHODOLOGY............. ............ ........................ PCM Sampling Procedure......................... Personal Samples ..................................... Average Room Air Samples ..................... Background Air Samples for TEM Analysis Background Air Samples for PCM Analysis Light Microscopy Analysis......................... Electron Microscopy Analysis ................... Statistical Comparisons............................. Laboratory Accreditation ........................... DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS ............................... Isolation Test Chamber............................. Background Sampling Results................... Selection of Fittings................................... Valve Packing Removal Test Method___ Sampling Results During Test................... CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................................. 9 APPENDICES ' A * Compilation Spreadsheets and Graphs * TESTING RESULTS B - Compilation Spreadsheets and Graphs * PRE-TEST BACKGROUND RESULTS C - PCM Laboratory Reports D - TEM Laboratory Reports _ . E Original Photographs FIBER RELEASE STUDY INDUSTRIAL FITTINGS VALVE PACKING REMOVAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Objectives The purpose of the study was to determine the concentration of fibers in the air while packing material was removed from valves. Background . The study was performed using intact valves from industrial fittings. The fittings had been in service many years and were obtained from a decommissioned power house. The study was conducted in an isolation chamber to eliminate outside influences. The study was conducted at the rate of one (1) fitting per hour over an 8-hour period. ' The study was conducted on October 2.1996 by Mr. Fred Boelter. This report presents the results of the study described herein. Sample, Resets All samples measured concentrations of fibers in air well below the U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (USDOL-OSHA) 8-hour TimeWeighted Average (TWA) Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 0.1 fibers per cubic centimeter (f/cc). Sample results are presented in the accompanying tables. Fiber Release Study - Industrial Fittings/Valve Packing Removal November 19, 1996 Page 2 METHODOLOGY PCM Sampling Procedure Samples were collected and analyzed following NIOSH Method 7400. Air was drawn through a 25mm, conductive cowl cassette with a 0.8 micron mixed cellulose ester (MCE) filter for collecting airborne particulate. The cassette was connected to a dedicated Giiian servo-drive pump. The pump was used to maintain a flow rate of two (2) liters per minute (Ipm) for both personal and area room air samples. A Brooks rotameter was used to calibrate the pumps prior to and post sample collection. The rotameter was calibrated against a primary standard. The samples were sealed, labeled and shipped to the laboratory for analysis. Samples were signed by BEC, placed in a UPS shipping envelope, sealed, tracked by UPS, and arrived at the laboratory by next day air. EsrspnaLSampJgs Personal samples were collected by attaching the cassette in the breathing zone of the individual performing the work for the duration of the test. The sampling pump was worn on the individual's belt. . Average Room Air Samples - The isolation chamber was subdivided into 3,600 one cubic foot (1ft3) modules. For purposes of identification, each module was assigned a discrete, consecutive number. To determine the average room air concentration, eight (8) of the modules were selected using a random number generator. A sample cassette was located in the center of the respective module for the duration of the test. Background Air Samples for TEM Analysis . _ Prior to conducting the test, the room was sampled to verify cleanliness. Five (5) samples were analyzed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) following AHERA Protocol. Just prior to collecting the samples, a "leaf blower" was utilized to aggressively disturb the isolation chamber's interior surfaces. Air was drawn through a 25mm, conductive cowl cassette with a 0.8 micron mixed cellulose ester (MCE) filter for collecting airborne fibers. The cassette was connected to a dedicated Gast high volume pump. The pump was used to maintain a flow rate of 10 liters per minute (Ipm). A BGI rotameter was used to calibrate the pumps prior to and post sample collection. The rotameter was calibrated against a primary standard. Fiber Release Study - Industrial Fittings/Valve Packing Removal November 19. 1996 Page 3 The samples were sealed, labeled and shipped to the laboratory for analysis. Samples were signed by BEC, placed in a UPS shipping envelope, sealed, tracked by UPS, and arrived at the laboratory by next day air. Background Air Samples for PCM Analysis ' Simultaneous with collecting the five (5) samples for analysis by AHERA Protocol, three (3) additional air samples were collected in accordance with NIOSH 7400 for PCM analysis "on*site" in the BEC office. The same analytical procedures were followed in the BEC office as were used in the laboratory. An Olympus Model CH-2 phase contrast microscope was used for the BEC analyses. Light Microscopy Analysis . Samples were analyzed in accordance with NIOSH Method 7400. Total fiber counts were determined by phase contrast microscopy (PCM) in accordance with the NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, Fourth Edition, dated 8/15/94, A Rules. Values for PCM analysis are provided in the Appendix A and Appendix B spreadsheets. Only fibers longer than 5 microns which have a length to width ratio equal to or greater than 3:1 are counted. PCM analysis counts all fibers meeting the specified dimensions. The analysis is not specific for asbestos but is the method specified to be used in the OSHA regulations. The PCM laboratory reports are presented in Appendix C. Electron Microscopy Analysis AHERA Protocol transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis was performed on all background samples to verify the cleanliness of the isolation chamber prior to beginning the test. The sample analysis was performed as described in the Federal Register Vol. 52. No. 210, the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA Protocol). Small squares were cut from each filter, processed appropriately, placed onto 200 mesh copper screens (grids) and transferred to a modified Jaffe Wick Washer containing acetone solvent. After the appropriate processing time, the grids were examined with a JEOL 1200EX or 100CX TEM. Grid openings from each sample were scanned at 20,000 X. When fibers or structures of various shapes were encountered, they were assessed for morphological characteristics and crystalline structure with selected area electron diffraction (SAED). The TEM laboratory reports are presented in Appendix D. Statistical Comparisons Data was formatted in spreadsheets for analysis. Statistical functions were performed including maximum, average, minimum, standard deviation, and variance. Fiber Release Study - Industrial Fittings/Valve Packing Removal November 19, 1996 Page 4 The spreadsheets in Appendices A and B present the data and summarize the statistical analyses performed. Laboratory Accreditation The*samples were shipped to and analyzed by R. J. Lee Group, Inc. in their Monroeville, Pennsylvania laboratory. R. J. Lee is accredited for TEM analysis by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) under the National' Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) as Lab #101208. R. J. Lee is also accredited for PCM analysis by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) as Lab #8204. Fiber Release Study - Industrial Fittings/Valve Packing Removal November 19, 1996 Page 5 DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS Isolation Test Chamber Testing was performed in the Boelter Environmental Consultants' (EEC's) Isolation Test Chamber. The chamber is 20 feet wide by 20 feet deep and is 9 feet in height. The chamber was constructed of 6 mil polyethylene sheeting to physically separate the activity being tested from outside of the chamber influences. The chamber is shown in Figure 1. The chamber was a static environment. FIGURE 1 BEC Isolation Test Chamber During the test, there was no air movement into the chamber and there was no air movement out of the chamber. During cleaning, the room was ventilated with HEPA filtered air. Entry into the chamber was only through an access airlock. Background Sampling Results Prior to conducting any tests, the isolation chamber was systematically cleaned. Following the cleaning, a series of background samples were analyzed from five (5) area sampling locations in accordance with AHERA protocol. Background samples were collected under "aggressive" conditions with analysis by TEM in accordance with AHERA Protocol. Results of the Pre-Test Background sampling are shown in the following table: STATISTICAL FUNCTION Aggressive Air TEM-(s/mmJ) Background - MAXIMUM AVERAGE MINIMUM STAND. DEV VARIANCE COUNT 33.5 18.4 84 12.3 151.2 5 The levels met the AHERA Clearance Criteria of an average of less than seventy structures per millimeter squared (<70 s/mm!) for the 5 samples and the room was considered clean. Results are shown in the spreadsheet presented in Appendix B. Selection of Fittings ' Eight (8) finings were selected for the valve packing removal test. Fittings which were selecteo for the test were as shown in the following table: Fiber Release Study Industrial Fittings/Valve Packing Removal November 19, 1996 Page 6 HOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 78 TABLE 1 FITTINGS SELECTED FITTING NUMBER SHAFT DIAMETER (in.) PACKING DIAMETER (in.) 7 1 1 3/4 22 13/16 1 7/16 16 1 6 '7/8 1 7/8 15 15/16 20 7/8 19 7/8 1 11/16 1 >4 1 5/16 1 y*. 1 1/4 1* PACKING DEPTH (in.) 5/16 1 3/16 1&M6 13/16 13/16 11/16 15/16 7/8 All fittings were obtained by Mr. Boelter from a decommissioned power house.' All fittings were carefully cleaned prior to being used in the test.* Valve Packing Removal Test Method A work bench and hoist was placed in the center of the test chamber. The eight (8) fittings selected for the test (See Table I) were all placed in the isolation chamber. Personal and average room air samplers were started prior to beginning the testing. The samplers were stopped after completion of the testing. Testing stahed at about 8:00am and was concluded at about 5:00pm ("test cycle"). There was about a one hour break starting at about 12 noon. During the testing, no one left or entered the isolation chamber. Each hour during the test cycle, one of the eight fittings was positioned in the center of the room on the work bench ("cycle event*). A typical setup for an event cycle is shown in Photo 1. PHOTO 1 * Test setup for Valve Packing Removal and Replacement. Fitting is placed on the work bench. - Each of the eight cycle events were essentially the same. During the hourly cycle event, similar procedures were followed as described in Table i!:. 1 The decommissioned power house was located in Peona, Illinois. * The fittings were carefully blasted with glass beads to remove surface corrosion, rust, paint, insulation, etc. The gaskets were left intact. A light coat of clear lacquer was spray applied to the fitting after cleaning to prevent rusting. The edge of the flange was masked off dunng spraying to protect the gasket. If not removed, the surface corrosion, rust, paint, and insulation would have interfered with the analysis. Fiber Release Study Industrial Fittings/Valve Packing Removal November 19, 1996 Page 7 STEP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 TABLE II TYPICAL HOURLY CYCLE EVENT ACTIVITY Place fitting on work bench Removal of wheel Remove bolts holding compression ring in place Removal of valve packing material Cutting the valve packing material replacement Replacing the valve packing material Replacement and packing of bolts PHOTO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Thumbnail photographs depicting the various steps described in Table II follow below. Full size photographs are presented in Appendix E. PHOTO 2 Removing wheel. PHOTO 3 Removing bolts. PHOTO 4 Removing packing Fitting #1 is shown. Fitting #22 is shown. material. Fitting #16 is shown. PHOTO 5 Cutting packing PHOTO 6 Replacing of PHOTO 7 Replacing bolts, material. Fitting #6 is shown. packing. Fitting #1 is shown. Fitting #22 is shown. Sampling Results During Test Results of S^riour Time-Weighted Average Permissible Exposure Limit sampling are: STATISTICAL FUNCTION PCM Arwtysi* by NIOSH 7400 (Tot*11lee) - Personal Samples- Average Room Air MAXIMUM 0.027 _ AVERAGE " ` 0.026 ' MINIMUM 0.024 STAND OEV. 0.002 VARIANCE COUNT 0.000 2 0.0310.023 0.018 0.003 0.000 g * Fiber Release Study - Industrial Fittings/Valve Packing Removal November 19, 1996 Page 8 All sample results show the concentrations to be well below the current OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit of 0.1 f/cc as sampled over an 8-hour time-weighted average period of time. Refer also to Figure 2 for a graphical presentation of the air sample results. Figure 2 - Graphical presentation of the air sample results. The Appendix A spreadsheets and charts present and depict the results of the testing in detail. Fiber Release Study Industrial Fittings/Valve Packing Removal November 19, 1996 Page 9 CONCLUSIONS Packing material was removed from valves at the rate of one (1) per hour. Eight (8) room air samples and two (2) personal samples were collected during the processing. All sample resulis show the airborne concentrations of fibers to be well below the current OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit of 0.1 f/cc as sampled over an 8*hour time-weighted average period of time. Respectfully submitted, BOELTER ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Frederick W. Boelter, CIH, PE, DEE, QEP Reviewed by, Gary N. Crawford, CIH Enclosures FAAPPS\WP5\XPR7.W\t41SXXXXU60Z^EPOATSM4184602.IVP * APPENDIX A Compilation Spreadsheets and Graphs TESTING RESULTS oooNnooMnooNcoo-oNoeoNooor*tNoon <o*Nr opCN* o6 (O c n o o SSo8 O nN Ntp N*rOfovOo o o o o o' m Soo5 oX o5 o3 oISoS_ o_tn ooc<n c(N <NJC*<N<N<N<N<Nf*0<M<N UJ Krs>iCKMhfVF<*MhMrf^PrN|fhXl NBNA(pO)lAf n ^ o04 oN o- ** oC* 8 **rmoooo O luf oil< lg j r> c* r> * - re < z J its UJ uiuiiSuiuiSiuiui sssssss 8888888 frcKircciracECD U-3J iUcJ !:J *;Nr)^W(pNeo>-f-goUso.Qu.j : <<<<<<<<<< al a. 0pO)>p0O))p0w>)p0O)e)0(7p)>0Op)00p)0O)p)0Op))COt))f09i>c>O0o>) ** J> Jijf u-T u"> irT tti > irT VV>t>t>)>eu4}>) tuc-oj U5<J EtiEivEvEiEcEiEivEdE'EiiEivE sssg-sssssssi' IZZZZZZZZZZZZ j iUnJ :;>02nCn.>2QOn'.>2aVn^>2O^Q.>KUt>>CQft.i>JnQ2C>n1C2>qQV^.>n2VQ.>nCfi^i.l>nC0l. ISiSls s^iisg 2 < S in > o * APPENDIX B Compilation Spreadsheets and Graphs PRE-TEST BACKGROUND RESULTS PRE-ACTIVITY BACKGROUND TESTING RESULTS Collec Industries/Garlock Packing BAI Project #1410A-46OO co eo co to to to Ow tz 5 -J w _J _ (N IZg<JE w < " 3| 1E Dro r(*o) CD GO 00 J- (A O JT0Do) : , to ' in ^ v co rw in ro CD CD CN tco ^ t- in UJ UJ goo o5 oooo ro co ro ro ro ooooo UJ 5I < t" to yo Cl t-- 5< <U to O Ul -* UJ i w uj cr o-I. UmJ 52 w< Dz t- UJ UwJ < "D cUrJ w2 -i oooo n ro ro ro ro cr UJ SNtZ UJ UJ > UJ Z </> CO (J v- v' <<<<<zz UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ < < cr cr cr cr cr _i i < < < < < co m ^ n n <i in to r>CD 0 CD CD (X) CD CD in in in in in in in SCO <p < ID <> (p 0> 0> 9> w O) $ >>>>>>> o O O O 0-0 o Z Z Z ZZ ZZ o* v^ r o* ^ rf-r m in m m in m in > 5 uj 5 o UJ igiiiz 5g2 <S5fW|i> OS * (WOd) O) CO h co in co CM *- o o o o o o o do 5 S6i _ g jr .5 . . ^ ag <C S oe ^ r^ `^3'' I^ ? 3 5 I *e -8aI <Iai </ CM UJ Ttf i uj 5H Z UJ if, BACKGROUND TESTS - NOV 14,1996 BAI Project 1418A-4600 TEM AHERA (Aggressive) |jj|||| PCM 7400 (Aggressive) -z UJ UJ -i-O fsN' ,,! : 1 7b N J v? 5 -s & *5 5 tu CO r- UJ CO C-. mr) j: U2*J r> * N. <1 o ooo oo^ ooo ooo ooo oo_ ' in . 'C _ CO. . r-CM- T" (V*3HV IAI3J.) Sujlu/s APPENDIX C PCM Laboratory Reports Test Report T o ta l F iber Concentrations PC M A ir Analysis Project AOH611606 ^ ^>0 ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^vO C' O' ^ O' O"" O~' 0> O' O' O' O' O' >i T3 S y0\O\At0yetOOO ''NHN(NNNN 8888S8 dddod t'n(NvoNr^-Cr'toOr^frsiNo O. Ofn Or* OO<s On O5 Oen ooooodoe 8W<n Om too N fs !fi 0e6s SSSoSSSS ddeooddd aa 88 od 01 -- m O onoo oe ss od fj 81 at <&c rV-I VC v% pi 8 VO 5vV*Ii tso s OVfllI' 0k0J S 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 S88 Cmw *f* dsy der> vi Vd vi v'Ci O' n V*TI ^VI VI II is *Ovei "vVi O O 5 -- -- 1 sffl 1 ss 00 $ 00 S 2 | w-> VI VI V) VI w VI VI VI VI f*C 55 . oo oo 00 00 00 eo 00 00 6 00 06 r-* r- p- f- t- r* f- r r- >N O" s ^ d d - o* d o 4- -*<s*^>^vir^ooO'*7lgLOetou t<n<vi<viv<iv<ii<A<viv<iv<iv<ii4A4vi es 2 o 2.; B Oonn' wO''0T,-*OvTM0^*j'vO0C>t'No.*t COvfrf`i Ov^,0viwOvWisC^O*jDi>vvCns-C'vr*i*viOv"' iw'vs--C"-, "v'i^cCr.`., v . (S PO 5*!<r z I ' 1 i Sc rOa |w3 '5U U= c -Sc gi-?.0* J2^ J 1 S i 5tt a- . (^w3. T*3: *5= jces. <c gco.' *eSo3: ,-5B ^ *. . APPENDIX D TEM Laboratory Reports Test Report T otal Asbestos S tructure Concentration T liM A llliK A Analysis Project AT1I611869 sC O' n* tN fN nt ni s 8 g^_ I s Os O !C` O => ^ V te ^ ^ ^ v? > V) 8 8 8 8 8 d dodo* *5 M QO QO 00 00 00 ddddd coo to au _ g^ sc wE ' <~c Si sOC' NOC' m in m in SOO' < 2 33333 <i sr -= | 2i V; C C-1 -- og m m M e 4 4 in n _ _V ac O -- ---Sr** v. = 5r ' - O' M!S " m1! 6u4 *V. iil 2 v<i vsi?t*| *4* 2 c(Q rr-- r**s cirn-ni r<m*A* r7 <n TT TJ* H XX Krs C. U" op ^>\ (O 15 e s < 9 5^ --n= f S3 S rI <e 33 ~ - c tn ^ a-- ~ ?< " l5f y -- fe .2 > c. = % 2. K| g 2H ^cv wyC -m, 11IILl . = -= = 2 c >3 ^ - " 5 5. s t X i, > _ -- c S< /vTz APPENDIX E Original Photographs m .* Photo 1 Test setup for Valve Packing Removal and Replacement. Fitting placed on the work bench. C \COLTEC\PM-PHCrtO SPl -Photo 3Removing bolts. Fitting #22 is shown. -Photo 4Removing packing material. Fitting #16 is shown. C \COLTEC\Ph.PhOTO 5P? * -Photo 6Replacmg packing. Fitting #1 is shown. C COlTEC^h-PhCTO SP3 .* -Photo 7Replacing bolts. Fitting #22 is shown. C 'OlTEC\Ph.PhOTO $P<