Document DDeeVQb92xrz62RLoRbGL57R5

.Federal Register / Vol. 51, No. 119 / Friday, June 20. 1986 /.Notices 22S59 Decommissioning. Approval, Humboldt County. Due: August 15. 1986. Published FR 5-2-86--Review Period extended. Daled: June 17,1906. Willinn D. Dickerson. Acting Director. Office ofFederal Activities (FR Doc. 86-14019 Filed 6-19-80: 8:45 um| BILL1HO CODE 6SCO-SO-M IER-FRL-3031-11 Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments Availability of EPA comments prepared May 27,1986 through May 30. 1986 pursuant to the Environmenlal Review Process (F.RP). under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmenlal Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at (202) 362-5076/73. An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published in FR daled February 7,1986 (51 FR 4804). Draft EISs ERP No. D-BLM-C70002-NM, Rating 1.0, Carlsbad Resource Area, Resource Mgmt. Plan. NM. SUMMARY: EPA expressed no objection to the proposed action as described in the draft EIS. ERP No. DS-COE-A36034-CA. Rating EC2, Corte Madera Creek Flood Control Project, Unit No. 4, Update Modifications. CA. SUMMARY; EPA expressed concerns that .the project could have significant adverse impacts . on Corte Madera Creek's water quality and beneficial u9es. especially fisheries. The final EIS also should more clearly discuss the design, impacts and proposed mitigation of two other alternatives discussed in the draft supplemental EIS. ERP No. D-FHW--E40692-CA. Rating EC2.1--20 Widening, Hill Street to Columbia Drive. Right-of-Way Acquisition. CA. SUMMARY: EPA's primary concerns were with the inadequate alternative, air quality, noise, and water quality analysis. EPA. therefore, requested considera lion of mass transit alternatives, an inlerscctional air quality analysis, total project hydrocarbon emissions data, a non-build air quality analysis, more definitive noise abatement information, and mitigation for a proposed channel relocation. . Final EISs . Draft EIS9 ERP No. F-FHW-K40105-CA. CA-1 Improvement. Devil's Slide, Half Moon Bay Airport to I.inda Mar Boulevard, 404 Permit, CA. SUMMARY: EPA had serious concerns with proposed wetland impacts and the lack of adequate mitigation. Additional air data was also requested. ERP No. F-FHW-K40152-AZ. Arizona Forest Hwy. l/AZ-67 Reconstruction, |ucob Lake to Grand Canyon Nat'l Park, AZ. SUMMARY: EPA indicated that the final EIS adequately assessed the environmental impact of the proposed action. ERP No. F-SCS-C3B131-IJV, Mill Haven Watershed Flood Prevention and Drainage Plan, LA. SUMMARY: EPA expressed no objection to the proposed action with proper implementation of mitigation measures as described. Amended Notice The following review should have appeared in the FR Notice published on May 23,1986. ERP No. F-AKS-J65101-MT. Beaverhead Nat'l Forest. Land and Resource Mgmt. Plan. MT. SUMMARY: EPA is pleased that (lie Forest had committed.to redesign or drop projects that cannot meet Stale of Montana water quality standards. Since the application of Best Management Practices (BMPs) does not necessarily protect water quality and stream use. the effectiveness of BMPs must be continuously evaluated with water quality, watershed; and fisheries monitoring programs. If necessary, corrective actions must be implemented. Dated: June 17,1966. William D. Dickerson. Acting Director. Office ofFederal Activities. (FR Doc. 88-14021 Filed 6-19-86: 8:45 am) 8IU.IN0 CODE 6560-S0-M IER-FRL-3034-6] Environmental Impact Statements end Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments Availability of EPA comments prepared June 2,1988 through June 6. 1988 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP). under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at (202) 382-5076/73. An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated February 7,1988 (51 FR 4804). ERP No. D-AFS-J65145-MT, Rating EC1. Dcerlodge Nat'l Forest. Noxious Weed and Poisonous Plant Control Program, MT. SUMMARY: EPA endorses control of noxious weeds and supports the integrated pest management alternative described in this draft EIS. EPA stresses that technical comments and j recommendations provided by the Montana Department of Agriculture, Environmental Management Division, should be. carefully followed and pesticide applications must be made only by certified applicators or operators, 1 ERP No. D-BLM-K70001-CA, Ra ling EC2. California Desert Conservation Area Plan. Amendments. CA. SUMMARY: EPA expressed concerns that two amendments to the Plan did not discuss impacts to 9oil, air and water, and recommended that the Bureau of Land Management discuss them in the final EIS. ERP No. DS-CDB-KB90558-CA. Rating 1.0. Oakland Chinatown Redevelopment Project. Construction. Additional Information, Grants. CA. SUMMARY:. EPA has no objections to the project, but commented on air quality aspects of the draft supplemental EIS. ERP No. D-COE-F32136-1N. Rating E02. Indiana Harbor Confined Disposal Facility (CDF), and Maintenance Dredging. Construction. IN. SUMMARY: EPA expressed objections to the proposed activity because of unresolved concerns related to seepage, upstream contaminants, monitoring, and maintenance. More information was requested regarding the extent and location of the contamination within proposed dredge areas, dredging operations, the relationship between sediment characteristics and water quality, design and operation, and . wildlife impacts. In addition. EPA felt that it could hot support the recommended CDF location until a suitable ujiland site is located and assessed as a potential alternative... ERP No. D-COE-F40266-IL. Rating E02, North-South Tollway Construction. Fill Material Discharge. Lily Cache Creek and DuPage River, Sect. 404 Permit, 1L. SUMMARY: EPA's review resulted in objections because of unacceptable impacts to water quality and wetlands. Additionally, the Morten Arboretum, a unique collection of woody species from temperate regions, would be adversely affected by the proposed tollway. More information, regarding air quality, noise, salt spray, water quality, 1 r f GLEASON-000824