Document D2VBQnOZX0mkbzYDnYJwKeLB
FILE NAME Allied Signal Bendix ASB
DATE 0000 DOC ASB033
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Excerpt from Journal Article
2372
ganics Vehicle tests also showed a reduction in noise levels an unexpected bonus
metallics are currently being produced for one domestic vehicle equipped with solid rotors Combinations of organic and metallic pads are being used on a domestic station wagon luxury car and several light truck applications The use of semimetallics has also been expanded to the larger disc brakes currently released for heavy trucks
SMALL CAR SOLID ROTOR APPLICATIONS
As previously discussed one of the prerequisites of a friction material is its ability to resist wear under various temperatures it will experience in service We also have seen that smaller cars equipped with solid rotors will subject the friction materials to
a wider range of temperatures than the mate-
rials used on larger cars equipped with ven-
tilated rotors It has been our experience
that reasonably good predictions of durability
life can be made knowing the wear versus tem-
perature characteristics of any material
The effects which rotor weight and brake
configuration have on operating conditions can
easily be observed or measured with a Full
Brake Dynamometer A procedure which has been
used consists of a series of braking cycles
at six different initial brake temperatures
Each cycle is comprised of 300 stops made from
50 mph at 12 fpsps deceleration The time
interval between stops is varied to maintain
a constant initial rotor soak temperature The
initial rotor soak temperature is increased
from 250 to 625 in 75 increments After
the 625 cycle a 250 cycle is repeated to
establish the low temperature wear rate after
severe usage The linings are measured after
each cycle and the incremental wear plotted The total rotor wear experienced for the 2400
stop test is also recorded
The data illustrated in Figure 7a b and
c were accumulated using a 9 diameter solid
rotor 0.375 thick weighing 6 lbs
Wheel
load used was 975 lbs
The results clearly show the wear superiority of the metallics over both the Class A and Class B organics While the total
rotor wear for both the Class A and Semi-
metallic formulations were comparable the Class B materials showed considerably higher
opposing surface wear
Another inertia dynamometer wear procedure used by some European manufacturers to screen potential friction materials is a series of 4 cycles consisting of 250 snubs from 50
to 17 mph 13 secdeceleration in which
the time intervals between applications is
held constant at 95 seconds Temperatures
generated on this schedule are relatively low usually peaking at about 250 for the brake outlined above As in the previously discuss-
P. KWOLEK
ed wear versus temperature data the semimetallics showed distinct advantages over both
the Class A and Class B organics see Figure
CLASS - ORGANIC
.100
| )
INNER OUTER ROTOR
-----
.000 WEAR
j
INCHES .080 +
+
e
+
+
+
H
INCHES
4
INCHES
.
4
+
-
>
>
+
+
WEAR .060+ .060+
WEAR
WEAR T e
MAXIMUM .040- +
MAXIMUM
MAXIMUM
+
MAXIMUM
MAXIMUM .020 +
+
PS
+
+
+
-
+
B 250
ROTOR
+
'
400 550
250
TEMPERATURE F
Fig Wear dynamometer
versus
975 lb
temperature inertia wheel load solid rotor
CLASS ORGANIC
INNER
|
100 OUTER .008
ROTOR .008 WEAR
|
.080
+
+
#
'
4
|
INCHES
INCHES
>
+
+
+
+
r
WEAR .060 +
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
WEAR
WEAR
+
+
o
+
C4
+
+
4
.040f
+
+
et
et
+
S
MAXIMUM
MAXIMUM MAXIMUM
MAXIMUM
ns
a.
mY
B 250 400 550 250
ROTOR TEMPERATURE F
Fig Wear versus temperature inertia dynamometer 975 lb wheel load solid rotor
FRICTION MATERIALS
SEMI- METALLIC
100
|
INNER OUTER -----
ROTOR .000 WEAR
INCHES oBot +
6
.S
+
+
+
+
>
INCHES
INCHES
+
+
+
+ oa
+
t
WEAR .060f a
WEAR
+
4
+
+
WEAR
+
+
+
+
a
r
+
q
MAXIMUM .040 +
<
*
+
'
+
+
4F
MAXIMUM
MAXIMUM
t
+
+
+
-
+
+
q
MAXIMUM
4 MAXIMUM
.020 er
4
*
+
+
+
+
.
L +
+
+
+
+
+
+
7
,
a nk
ceed 4
B 250 400 550 250
ROTOR TEMPERATURE F
2373
tests The differences between front and rear
brake mileage projections are due to the dif-
ferences in operating temperatures and lining
availability
Rear brake operating tempera-
tures were approximately 100 below the front
brakes thereby drastically improving the wear
rates of the Class A organic
In the case of
the Class B organic and metallics the
lower rear brake mileage projections are the
result of differences in available lining
thickness
-
-
AVERAGE =
-
-
50,000 MILES
-
> MINIMUM
-
-40,000 -40,000 MILES
-
Fig Wear versus temperature inertia dynamometer 975 lb wheel load solid rotor
-
30,000 -
-
Y
.025
INCHES
INCHES
( .020
WEAR
LINING .015
LINING
CLASS B CLASS SEMI -MAXIMUM
Yyj -
20,000 MILES -
-
J Z
4 G
_
Gg
;
_
LINING
D>
Y ,
.010 SUfG O4p re INCREMENTAL
_
D -AVERAGE
v)
Z U; ... INCREMNTAL .005
RR
RR ~~ RR
e d A INCREMENTAL
... INCREMENTAL
At
CLASS
... A
CLASS B
SEMI
2
4
4
Fig Mileage projections 2500 mile durability test 1973 sedan 2800 lb G.V.W.
Fig Incremental lining wear inertia
dynamometer simulation of 2800 lb G.V.W.
sedan running low temperature durability
In the introduction front brake tempera-
ture profiles were outlined Figure 2 for a
durability test of a vehicle equipped with
solid rotors having a brake test weight of
2800 lbs
Tests conducted on Class A
Class B organics and metallics using this
vehicle procedure have repeatedly verified
that metallics offer distinct improve-
ments in lining life The results Illustrated
in Figure 9 confirm the incremental wear rates
previously found in full brake dynamometer
The particular brake system evaluated
utilized front brakes lined with pads 0.475
thick while the rear brakes had pads which
were 0.185 thick It is interesting to note
that similar tests on larger cars equipped
with ventilated rotors rarely show life pro-
jections over 30,000 miles
Significant reductions ir noise levels
were noted when metallics were compared
to the Class B organics
While specific
noise hunts detected brake noise ratings as
low as 7 for the metallicts he Class B
organics showed unacceptable noise ratings as
low as 4 see SAE J1060 Further improve-
.
scsanesineasieeyen
dl
TON A Rn
2374
|
J. P. KWOLEK
ment in noise rating levels were achieved when typical U.S. type insulators were added
to the back of the steel shoes
A series of vehicle tests were initiated
over a year ago in Europe in which a new semi
metallic formulation was installed on vehicles
subjected to three different types of duty and were compared to a typical O.E. organic lining
1. Taxi cabs having automatic and standard
transmissions
2. Rental cars
3. Business travelers described as country
driving
The estimated annual driving ranges from
12,500 miles 20,000 km for rental cars to
25,000 miles 40,000 km for taxi cabs and
business travelers
The results tabulated
below Table 1 indicate the metallics
reduced lining wear rates significansthlowy-
ing 250 to 430 improvement
With respect to rotor wear the lic offered similar advantages over
organic see Table 2
metalthe Class B
SUMMARY
The performance and wear advantages of metallic linings over conventional organic
types have previously been established More
recent development has made them more comparable for initial friction and low temperature or initial wear characteristics
The high temperature wear capacity of metallic linings enhances their potential
for usage 031 smaller cars with solid rotor
brakes Actual vehicle comparisons have shown substantial improvements over Class B type organics for projected lining life rotor life and noise characteristics under a variety of usage conditions
The gains in lining and rotor life offered by metallics would appear to make them
a most viable and cost effective candidate for
use on small cars with solid rotor brakes and
relative small lining pad areas
REFERENCES
1. F. William Aldrich Metallics A
New Type of Friction Material
SAE Paper
710591 June 7-11 1971
2. G. R. Wynne Development of Police Car
Brake Standards SAE Paper 750397
Feb. 24-28 1975
3. Seong Kwan Rhee & John P. Kwolek
U.S. Patent 3,835,118 Sept. 10 1974
Table 1 - Lining Wear Rates 1000 Km
Class B Organic 0.E.
Semi Metallies
Taxi Cabs
Automatic
Manual
6.5 1.5
4.0 1.5
Car Rentals
1.5 0.5
Business Travelers
1.5 0.5
Table 2 - Rctor Wear Rates 10,000 Km
Class B Organic O.E.
Semi Metallics
Taxi Cabs
Automatic
Manual
0.57 0.02
0.33
0.02
Car Rentals
0.12 0.06
Business Travelers
0.10
0.04
es
oatOe
/