Document ByBqY8NM8z7VQNEn2pKBXa15L

To: Cc: From: Sent: Subject: Fotouhi, David[fotouhi.david@epa.gov] Jackson, RyanOackson.ryan@epa.gov] Smith, Lem O. Thur 7/13/2017 1:56:32 PM Re: Methane Ruling David, 10 am Friday is perfect. Shall we initiate the conference line? Many thanks, and I will send you participant names from Tulsa in advance. Thanks again RJ. Best, Lem Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone ---------Original message---------From: "Fotouhi, David" <fotouhi.david@epa.gov> Date: 7/12/17 8:17 PM (GMT-05:00) To: "Smith, Lem O." <lem.smith@squirepb.com> Cc: "Jackson, Ryan" <jackson.ryan@epa.gov> Subject: RE: Methane Ruling Lem: Thank you for reaching out. I would be glad to discuss this. Would 10:00 a.m. eastern time on Friday morning work for you and your folks? Best regards, David 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00003837-00001 David Fotouhi Deputy General Counsel Office of General Counsel U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Tel: +1 202.564.1976 fotouhi.david@epa.gov From: Smith, Lem O. [mailto:lem.smith@squirepb.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 7:29 PM To: Jackson, Ryan <jackson.ryan@epa.gov> Cc: Fotouhi, David <fotouhi.david@epa.gov> Subject: Re: Methane Ruling Auto correct gets me everytime. Thanks, Congressman. David, pleased to meet you. Might you have time to chat about this for 30 minutes with me and the folks in Tulsa before end of week? FRIDAY morning perhaps? Thank you both. Best, Lem 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00003837-00002 Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone ---------Original message---------- From: "Jackson, Ryan" <jacksoti.ryan.@epa.gov> Date: 7/12/17 5:10 PM (GMT-05:00) To: "Smith, Lem O." <lem.smith@squirepb.com> Cc: "Fotouhi, David" <fotouhi.david@epa.gov> Subject: Re: Methane Ruling Ken, I wanted to connect you with David who is working on the lawsuit and why our steps and status are. Ryan Jackson Chief of Staff U.S.EPA______ j Ex. 6 - Personal Privacy > On Jul 12, 2017, at 5:08 PM, Smith, Lem O. <lem.smith@squirepb.eom> wrote: > > RJ, > > ONEOKE is a client and we're seeking guidance on the impact of the appellate court's decision vacating the agency's 90-day delay on CH4. > > When convenient, would you mind connecting me with someone in the GC's office to get their feedback? > > Thanks in advance. > > Best, > Lem > > > > 46 Offices in 21 Countries > > This message is confidential and may be legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00003837-00003 the intended recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete this message and any attachment from your system; you must not copy or disclose the contents of this message or any attachment to any other person. > > Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP is part of the international legal practice Squire Patton Boggs, which operates worldwide through a number of separate legal entities. Please visit www.squirepattonboggs.com for more information. > >#US >................................................................................... > > <Court Vacatur Of EPA Methane NSPS Stay Leaves Oil & Gas Sector In Limbo ,...pdl> > > > > Sent from my iPad, apologies for typos 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00003837-00004