Document BvdgE4Kp9JdqoYMeBnX3kxaqE

AR226-2503 George Woytowich 08/06/2001 09:16 AM To: H David Ramsey/SE/DuPont@DuPont cc: Dawn D Jacl<son/CL/DuPont@DuPont Subject: Re: Lubeck Testing Bl . (1) Yes, 1992 data is. from the New Lubeck location. (2) Note explanations are as follows: (Present, concentration estimated) = This is what the report says think that the result was below the Practical Quantitation Limit (value for the method that they have 98% confidence in) . and therefore the result is an estimate. (Result below method PQL) s Result below the Practical Quantitation Limit (value for the method that they have 98% confidence in) Outside hold time =: Due a misunderstanding samples were analyzed using a new method and when this was discovered and the remaining samples were analyzed by the original method the sample hold time had been exceeded. ' H David Ramssy TT^"- ''"d^L H David Rannsey ^^ 08/02/2001 04:48 PM To: George Woytow!ch/CL/DuPorrt@DuPont cc: Dawn D Jackson/CL/DuPonttgDuPont Subject: Re: Lubeck Testing^ Thanks very much , this is great two questions : (1) The 1992 data, this was the New Lubeck location , (2) Define meaning of terms in parenthesis so 1 mate sure I Interpret them properly Thanks George Woytowich U-Ui tt ^ U~''^L George Woytowich L1 08/02/200109:06 AM To: H David Ramsey/SE/DuPont@DuPont, Dawn D Jac(<son/CL/DuPont@DuPont cc; Subject: Lubeck Testing HDR002485 EID167090 I think this is what you wanted for the Tuesday meeting. Lubeck Sampling.doc If you need further Information please advise. HDR002486 EID167091