Document Be6VLnOgabV05KL5M5Oxo11w
42
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, Thursday, Aug. 9, 1979
Unwelcome Incinerator
rt
To Destroy Chemicals and Satisfy People
By Douolas Martin Staff Reporter of The Wall Street Journal .
LOGAN TOWNSHIP, N.J.-The smiling
executive plunges two fingers into a quart
jar of clear liquid; the viscous substance
consists of polychlorinated biphenyls, or
PCBs, the only toxic chemicals whose manu
facture is specifically outlawed by Congress.
"You've got a lot worse stuff than this in
your medicine cabinet," he asserts.
1 Maybe. But just try telling that to resi
dents of this surprisingly rural community
in the industrialized Delaware River Valley.
Although many of them work in nearby
chemical plants, the townspeople are hop
ping mad at the prospect that thousands of
pounds of PCBs will be trucked into a plant
operated here by Rollins Environmental
; Services Inc., a chemical-waste-disposal
company.
.
, The modernistic facility, which is sur
rounded by acres of tomato and pepper
fields, has been here for about a decade.
Now, along with another Rollins plant in
Deer Park, Texas, and a disposal plant in El
Dorado, Ark., it has applied to become one pf the first federally sanctioned sites for in
cinerating PtBs. None has yet been ap
proved. . The townspeople's angry reaction will un-
` doubtedly be repeated in other communities
as the nation wrestles with the problem of
finding places to destroy toxic wastes. "They're using us as guinea pigs," says
Mary More, the young deputy township
clerk, who worries that the chemicals could
harm her two children.
"Everybody feels they've had it shoved
down their craw," says Glen Hughes, a
heavy-equipment operator. Rosemary Wil
son, the owner of a country store, says she'll
"put the place up for sale" if the PCB burn
ing begins. '*' *t- :
..
Pollution Feared
The opponents are a collection of local
people, including housewives, laborers,
some professional people and local officials.
They say, among other things, that PCB-
burning would pollute nearby Raccoon
Creek, poison underground water supplies
and drastically depress local land values.
And they recall a 1977 explosion at the plant
that killed six workers.
. -'
The township's indignation is fueled by
vehement distrust of Rollins, which is a sub
sidiary of RLC Corp. and was one of the
* first companies to make a legitimate busi
ness of destroying toxic chemicals. At a
l hearing last week, residents told officials of
- the Environmental Protection Agency that * the company's operations here have been
characterized by leaking drums, noxious
- odors and sloppy procedures.___________ .
. The company denies all such charges. It
says that it does and will do an effective job
safely. But EPA officials at the hearing said
they were preparing a federal suit aimed at
halting any abuses.
:
National environmental groups aren't di
rectly involved in the dispute; more than
most people, they realize the need to dispose
of toxic chemicals someplace. However,
some of the representatives are trying to
make sure that things are done as safely as
possible at Logan Township. ' ,
Scientists say tests have proved that
PCBs can be safely and completely de
stroyed by incineration. Moreover, officials
of the Environmental Protection Agency
have vowed they won't let the burning begin
until they're absolutely satisfied that people
will be protected.
.
-
Procedure Defended
An EPA expert, James Marshall, direc
tor of external programs for the agency's
New York-New Jersey office, says, "In gen-'
cral, PCBs can be incinerated without any
public health risk" because the temperature
is high enough to completely transform the
PCBs into harmless carbon dioxide and wa
ter. If some PCBs did escape, he says, the
smokestack is constructed in such a way as
to disperse them high enough and far
enough to minimize health risks.
As for any danger before incineration, he
says, there are "very clear requirements"
spelled out to safeguard the public during
transport, handling and storage. . . `
Be, that as it may, says Mayor John
Wright, who works in a Du Pont chemical
plant, "no town in its right mind is going to
let these kinds of things come in." Clearly,
the people here won't be happy, until the Rol
lins plant is forced out of existence. "It's
morally not right," Kenneth A. DiMuzio, a
lawyer, said at the hearing.
-
All of which strikes some observers as
distressingly ironic. For years, critics have
castigated PCBs, pointing to specific cases
of the chemicals' turning up in the Hudson
River, North Carolina ditches and- even
mother's milk. Now that the federal govern
ment has set rigid rules for burning the stuff
so thoroughly that 99.9% of what is. inciner
ated is supposed to be destroyed, some peo-
pie see danger in that, too. A similar battle
is raging in El Dorado.
* . -.
Primarily used as insulators in electrical
equipment, PCBs haven't been made since
1977. (There are adequate substitutes.)
Since the 750 million pounds still in use will
be phased out over the next 40 years, PCBs
will increasingly exist solely as garbage-
dangerous garbage: The planned, incinera
tion method appears to be the only way to
effectively get rid of it. "It's a spooky
waste," acknowledges Jack Lurcott* the
Rollins executive who immersed his fingers
in the PCB jar. .
.
.
Rollins's president, William B. Philipbar,
agrees. "You're never going to get people to
accept this," he says in a moment of hear-
despair. "It's just impossible." Neverthe
less, the company already spent more than
$500,000 preparing its plant here for. the ar
rival of the PCBs. ?
.
The local opposition couldn't care "less.
"The ovens of Germany have not been de
stroyed, only relocated," read a sign placed
in front of the Rollins plant gate. Another of
the townspeople's messages paraphrased
the popular song "You Light Up My life."
It said, "You Stink Up My Life." \":i
Sometimes this emotion simply spills out
of control. As a public hearing last spring, a
woman began jumping about wildly, hurling
insults at Rollins officials. "If she'd had a
gun," Mr. Philipbar says, "she would .have
shot us."
.
Tours Don't Help
Even company-sponsored tours of the plant don't exactly dispel fears. Behind its high fences are discharge lagoons bubbling like witches' cauldrons, scores of drums .la beled with skull and crossbones, and a belching 300-foot smokestack. To boot, the operation regularly emits a "sickening
smell," says Esther Slusarski, a leading op
ponent.
x .
.
-
Rollins says it has already proved it can
do a professional job of disposing of more
than 10,000 different kinds of hazardous
chemicals-in Logan Township, Deer Park !
and Baton Rouge, La. It even burned PCBs ,
before the more stringent federal rules took
effect. The company was instrumental in
helping the EPA determine the tougher
standards.
-
'
' At least one townsperson is convinced:
"It's better to have them burned under con
trol than dumped somewhere," says Grace
Filemyr, who operates a vegetable stand
across the road from the plant. "A lot of
people are making statements not based on
fact," she says. "They go off the deep end."
Explosion Remembered
'-//*
The debate is made considerably nastier
by the memory of the fatal explosion 20
months ago that sent black smoke billowing
thousands of feet in the air. Remembering
that, Mayor Wright says: "These people
aren't to be trusted in any way, shape or
form.". fr\j
, v.V '
Rollins, which contends that the accident
was precipitated by outside contractors, not
by its own employes, says the catastrophe
actually proved the plant's safety. "The ex
plosion was an absolutely worst-case situa
tion," yet tests by outside experts showed
that toxic contamination "was all con
tained" on the. plant grounds, Rollins's Air.
Lurcott says. r-.r- .. .--. :r.
.PCBs aren't explosive and played no part
in causing the accident, the company says.
But one of 14 tanks involved did have mate
rial containing PCBs in it, and one reason
the accident.caused alarm'was the fear that
PCBs might have escaped into the atmos
phere. ,..;'
;
- *
The whole controversy could be resolved
within the next few months; the EPA hopes
to conduct a test-bum, largely to measure
the effectiveness of Rollins's monitoring
equipment. Several times, small quantities
of PCBs are to be incinerated at 2,700 de
grees Fahrenheit. But Mayor Wright hints
that the townspeople may resort to violence
to halt the test-bum.-."We're trying to stop it
completely," he says.
-.>- *
EPA officials say that the test-bum isn't
specifically required by law and that they
are demanding it principally as an extra
guarantee of safety. They promise that it
will be closely scrutinized. "The place will
be crawling with Feds," an agency spokes
man says. _
-
-In the end, the dispute comes down to a ]
question of balancing the national need to -safely dispose of toxic chemicals with under standable local wishes to see it done esewhere.
In this neck of the woods, the general view is 'Let's do it all in Nevada,' " Rollins's Mr. Lurcott says. He doubts that the people in Nevada would agree. .
*,-v> v.*-*
The Midnight Dumper
"Everybody wants it picked up; nobody
wants it put down," says Eckhardt C. Beck,
the EPA's regional administrator for New
York and New Jersey.
.
That could be disastrous. If society
doesn't give industries a place to dispose of
toxic waste, Mr. Beck asks, "what are they
going to do?" He answers his own question
. succinctly: "give it to the midnight dum-
;<l per" who illegally gets rid of toxic wastes
late at night by the side of the road or in va
cant lots. Mr. Beck's blunt conclusion carries omi*
: * nous implications, extending well beyond the
^ 440 million pounds of PCB wastes said to be strewn about the environment and the 750
r- million pounds of PCBs still in use. The
-1'EPA says it may cost $50 billion to clean up
past years' midnight dumping of toxic
chemicals. Further, it is calculated that
each year enough new hazardous waste is
generated-and, for the most part, improp- i
erly discarded-to fill every street and alley j
in Manhattan to knee level. / ..
j
PCBs play an important role in this
chemical horror story. Congress specifically
banned their manufacture in the Toxic Sub
stances Control Act of 1976, because they
are suspected of causing cancer and birth
defects, by getting into the air and the food
supply. PCBs were the only substance so
singled out. . -
PCB-ARCH-EXT0378554