Document B8m9zzZzOeRz3d29pE4O8186k

DownloadRandom document
AttacthoLmetetenrttoCs. AuerdatedMay 4, 2000 A R126-0165 Perfluoroctane Sulfonate Studies Mechanistic 1) Reports from University of Minnesota Duluth Research (Kendall Wallace): a) Kendall B. Wallace, Biochemical and Molecular Mechanistic Studies of N-Alkyl Perfluorosulfonamides, Research Proposal, April 8, 1997, and Updated Proposal May 7, 1998 b) Kendall B. Wallace and Anatoli Starkov, The Effect of Perfluorinated Arylalkylsulfonamides on Bioenergetics of Rat Liver Mitochondria, Feb. 4, 1998 ) Report on Covance Studies, assessment of mitochondrial bioenergetics, undated d) BSiuomemnearrgyeotifctshIen EVfiftercot,suonfdaPtFeCd's [Perfluorinated Compounds] on Mitochondrial ) ROxeipdoartti,oEnf,feDcetcs. o2f0S,el1e9c9t9ed Perfluoro-compounds on Mitochondrial Beta- f) Report, Effect of Acute FC Administration on Catalase and acylCoA Oxidase Expression, January 27, 2000 2) Nabbefeld, et al., Displacement of a Fluorescently Labeled Fatty Acid Analogue fPerrofmlFuaotrtoyocAtcainodtCataer,riPeortParsostieuimnsPebryflWuyoertoohct-an1e4,S6u4l3f,onAamtemoanndiuOtmher Known Peroxisome Proliferators, Abstract, Society of Toxicology, 1998 Annual Meeting 04128 Biochemical and Molecular Mechanistic Studies of N-Alkyl Perfluorosulfonamides DepartKmeenndtaolfl BBi.oWcahlelmaicset,ryPb&.DM.,olDe.cAu.lBa.rT.Biology `University ofDuMliuntnh,esMotNa Sc5h5o8o1l2of Medicine: F2A18X/772266--88809194 kwallace @d.umn.edu LONG-RANGE GOAL: ESTABLISH A SCIENTIFICALLY-BASED METHOD TO MONITOR FOR POTENTIAL HEALTH RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH WORKER OR CONSUMER EXPOSURE TO PERFLUOROALKYL ACIDS AND THEIR DERIVATIVES. SHORT-TERM GOAL (3-5 years): I. DEFINE RELIABLE BIOMARKERS FOR ASSESSING BOTH EXPOSURE AND BIOLOGICAL REACTIVITY. 2. DEFINE THE MOST APPROPRIATE EXPERIMENTAL SYSTEM (IN TERMS OF BEST REPRESENTING THE HUMAN SITUATION) FOR ESTABLISHING _ RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN EXPOSURE DOSE AND BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS. There exists considerable experimental evidence demonstrating that perfluoroalkyl acids and their derivatives have the potential of being toxic to humans, which raises serious concern for the Safe production, use and disposal of these chemicals in the work place, by the consumer, and in the environment. Many of the current and pending regulatory decisions for these products are based on experimental evidence gathered from rats, for which there is strong evidence for the induction of peroxisome proliferation, metabolic wasting and carcinogenesis [12,3]. However, the evidence for comparable effects in other mammalian species, including primates, is less convincing which suggests profound and important differences among species. Therefore, although cats may be the most convenient and extensively studied species, the evidence may not 1 04129 April 8, 1997 yield accurate indications of potential adverse human health effects. A more prudent means of managing potential human health risks associated with the production and use of these important products requires careful selection of a representative, yet convenient surrogate species test organism. The fact that chemical residues of perfluoroalkyl acids have been detected in sera of production workers [4] adds urgency to the need to understand potential health risks, to establish guidelines to safeguard human health, and to estimate margins of safety for exposed populations. In order to address the surrogate species issue, it is first necessary to establish one or more reliable indicators of toxic tissue damage upon which the species comparisons can be made. The proposed investigation is designed to provide an understanding of the underlying `mechanisms of toxic tissue injury and to identify reliable biomarkersoftissue damage that can be used for risk-management purposes. IMMEDIATE OBJECTIVES (24 months): 1. Define the "dominant" mechanism by which perfluoroalkyl acids and their derivatives manifest the well documented "metabolic wasting" effect observed in experimental animals in vivo. 2. Based on an understanding of the biological mechanism of action, identify potential biomarkers that can be used to provide reliable and quantitative estimates of exposures and the biological consequences associated with such exposures. 3. Using the biomarkers described for Aim 2, determine whether differences exist among species in their sensitivity to perfluoroalkyl acids and their derivatives and in the cellular mechanism by which the toxicity is manifested. NOTE: + The research plan is being submitted with the understanding that publication of the results will be subject to a 30 day first-right-of-eview by the sponsor, + The sponsor will provide all required quantities of test chemicals. + Selected tissue samples from the in vivo exposures will be archived for subsequent histological examination and trace residue and metabolite analyses, both to be performed by the sponsor. : The sponsor will be briefed on the progress of the funded project on a quarterly basis. In addition to the 18 month contract, an unrestricted gift of $100.000 is requested to support more empirical exploratory research on related topics. 2 04130 INTRODUCTION April 8, 1997 Perfluoroalkyl acids and their derivatives representa large and important class of synthetic chemicals, with production amounting to several thousands of pounds each year. These `compounds constitute a broad market including surfactant and foaming applications as well as potent pesticidal activity. Prudent regulation of the production, distribution, storage, application and disposal of these products necessitates a thorough understanding of the probability and nature of any potential adverse health effects. This proposal is directed at improving the confidence and judiciousness with which such risk management decisions are made. Although each member of this class possesses distinct structural and physical chemical properties, they share very similar biological activities when administered at high doses to experimental subjects. From a structure-activity basis, this suggests that the N-alkyl substituent, along with the length and branching of the carbon chain, determine the rates of absorption and the biological distribution (pharmacokinetics) of the compound but that the biological reactivity (toxicity) resides in the sulfonic acid or sulfonamide that is common to all members of the class (51. A fully comprehensive characterization of the risks associated with this class of chemicals would require rigorous investigation of the biological reactivity of each member compound. Such an analysis would be extremely costly, both in terms of resources and time. However, Dr. S. C. Gordon has proposed a tentative metabolic pathway for many of the N-alkylated perfluorooctane sulfonamides which consists of successive N-dealkylations leading to perfluorooctane sulfonic acid as the final common metabolite (Fig. 1). In view of the converging metabolic pathway, it may be possible to gain an accurate indication of potential health risks by examining only selected metabolites that are believed to be primarily responsible for the biological activity of the entire class. Thus, in the interest of efficiency, this initial investigation is limited to testing N-ethyl perfluorooctane sulfamido ethanol, N-ethyl perfluorooctane sulfamido acetate, the sulfonamide of perfluorooctane, and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid. The structures of all 4 proposed test compounds are bracketed in figure I. Perfluorooctanoic acid will serve as a positive control for all exposures. A rigorous understanding of the biological reactivities of these metabolites will provide the most efficient means of gaininga better understanding the potential health risks associated with the entire class of N-substituted perfluorooctane sulfonamides. 04131 3 Acute and chronic toxicity ofN-alkyl perfluorooctane sulfonamides - April 8, 1997 Both the sulfonic acid and the N-ethyl sulfonamide of perfluorooctane are essentially non-toxic on an acute basis. Only at very high oral doses (2-5 g/kg) are vague signs of gastrointestinal discomfort and weight loss observed. The primary concen with acute exposure. to these compounds is their persistence in the body, the half-lives being between 1 and 11 days depending on the dosing schedule and the tissue examined (6.7). Many of these chemicals bioconcentrate in the liver. Perfluorooctane N-ethyl sulfonamide is rapidly de-ethylated in vivo and it is the des-ethyl sulfonamide that accumulates in liver. This biopersistence raises serious concerns about the potential cumulative and long-term toxicity associated with continuous exposures to low concentrations of these chemical agents. Both perfluorooctane N-ethyl sulfonamide and sulfonic acid elicit profound subchronic toxicities regardless of the route of administration. Ninety-day feeding studies in rats caused deaths at doses of 100-150 ppm. Although high sub-lethal doses cause assorted neurological, musculoskeletal, dermatologic and hemopoetic abnormalities, the most consistent symptoms. observed at the lowest doses are anorexia, weight loss, emaciation, and elevation of liver enzymes in the plasma (8-12). This apparent hepatotoxicity is observed in rats, rabbits, dogs and `monkeys and is most prevalent in males, possibly due to the more rapid renal elimination of the metabolite in females. Regardless, there are no substantive histopathology or gross morphological changes that accompany the hepatotoxicity observed at low doses of either the Nethyl sulfonamide or the sulfonic acid of pecfluorooctane [9.12]. This, by itself, is strong evidence suggesting that the observed toxicity is more a manifestation of metabolic or functional deterioration, rather than structural damage. Proposed mechanisms oftoxicity - Manyofthe signs and symptoms associated with intoxication by perfluoroalkyl acids and their derivatives, such as the anorexia and weight loss, resemble that of a metabolic disorder. In deed perfluorooctane sulfonamide, like many other weak acids, has been demonstrated to uncouple mitochondrial respiration in vitro [1.2]. It is presumed, but has yet to be confirmed, that this leads to mitochondrial depolarization and the depletion of ATP in cell cultures as well as in vivo. Whether perfluorooctane sulfonic acid also uncouples mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation has yet to be determined. It is, however, well established that the sulfonic acid is a potent peroxisome proliferator in vivo in rats, which is evident as an hypertrophic hepatomegaly accompanied by proliferation of both mitochondrial and microsomal membranes 04132 4 April 8, 1997 (3). Associated with this is the stimulation of a number mitochondrial enzyme activities, including Mn-superoxide dismutase and fauy acyl CoA-oxidase. The reported interference with spermatogenesis and inhibition of sperm motility by N-ethyl perfluorosulfonamide is consistent with an effect on inhibiting mitochondrial bioenergetics [10]. The accumulation of triacylglycerols and free cholesterol in liver implies interference with fatty acid or lipid metabolism as a primary mode of expressionofthe toxicity [13,14]. In deed, the effects of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid on fatty acid and cholesterol synthesis mimics those of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, which are some of the most effective agents in treating hypercholesterolemias clinically. It may be more than coincidence that many of these lipid-lowering agents, such as the fibric acids and the phthalic acid plastisizers, are classical peroxisome proliferators. Although circumstantial, this lends strong support for an important effect of the perfluorocompounds on lipid metabolism. Haughom and Spydevold [13] suggest that the hypolipemic effect of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid results from ts inhibition of `mitochondrial camitine acyl-CoA transferase activity, which is required for the transport of long chain fatty acids for beta-oxidation within the mitochondrial matrix. Although not much is known regarding the biological action of perfluoroalky! acids and their derivatives, there is considerable information available for other peroxisome proliferators. As a class, these agents are known to interfere with mitochondrial respiration (although the precise mechanism is not known), to inhibit fatty acyl-CoA synthesis, acylcamitine translocase and mitochondrial fatty acid beta-oxidation, and cholesterol synthesis. Peroxisome proliferators also stimulate the expression of several immediate early response genes (such as c-fos and c-jun), CYP4, cyclin-dependent kinases, proliferating nuclear antigen, and the peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptor, whichis a ligand-activated nuclear transcription factor that up-regulates the expression of genes that transcribe various lipid metabolizing enzymes [15-17]. It is the expression of many of these early response genes that has been implicated in the non-genotoxic carcinogenic activity of peroxisome proliferators. Whether these same genes are activated by the perfluoroalkyl acids and their derivatives has yet to be determined. Regardless, the similarity in biological response with classic peroxisome proliferators provides ample opportunities to unravel many of the unresolved questions concerning their mechanism of action. It is curious, and perhaps unfortunate from a regulatory stand-point, that the vast majority of knowledge gained for perfluoroalkyl acids and their derivatives as well as for the classic peroxisome proliferators is derived from the laboratory rat. The concern lies in the fact that, although strongly predicted by rat data. there is little evidence for the proliferation of liver peroxisomes in humans exposed to these compounds. In fact, there are a nuomfnobn-perimrate species. such as guinea pigs and dogs. that don't respond to conventional peroxisome proliferators [18-21]. This then raises doubts regarding the validity of using rat data to establish 5 04133 April 8, 1997 regulatory policy for these agents. Of particular concern is the debate over whether the peroxisome proliferators, including the N-alkyl perfluorosulfonamides, are non-genotoxic carcinogens (22). The outcome will have profound effects on the regulation of these products, particularly in the context of the additives or residues in foodstuffs (e.g., N-cthyl perfluorooctane sulfamido ethanol). Resolution of this apparent species difference warrants immediate and aggressive attention. RESEARCH PLAN + SPECIFIC AIMS 1. Determine whether perfluoroalkyl acids and their derivatives interfere with mitochondrial electron transport and/or fatty acid metabolism by isolated rat hepatic mitochondria. 2. Identify molecular and peroxisomal biomarkers of N-ethyl perfluorooctane sulfamido ethanol exposure in vivo in ras. 3. Compare and contrast the response of hepatocyte cell cultures isolated from rats, guinea. pigs and primates exposed ex vivo to perfluorooctane sulfonic acid and its N-alkyl derivatives and to compare the molecularand peroxisomal biomarkers and the histopathology in rats and guinea pigs in response to in vivo exposure to N-ethyl perfluorooctane sulfamido ethanol. 04134 6 + EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH April 8, 1997 I. DETERMINE WHETHER N-ETHYL PERFLUOROOCTANE SULFAMIDO ACETATE, PERFLUOROOCTANE SULFONAMIDE, AND/OR PERFLUOROOCTANE SULFONIC ACID INTERFERES WITH CELLULAR ENERGY METABOLISM IN VITRO. Mitochondrial bioenergetics N-Ethyl perfluorooctane sulfonamide uncouples oxidative phosphorylation in kidney mitochondria in vitro [1,2]. The authors atribute this activity to the des-ethyl metabolite. We propose to expand on this observation to determine whether the perfluorooctane sulfonic acid and its sulfonamide derivatives uncouple mitochondrial respiration in the liver and to conduct a full scale characterizationofthe effects of these agents on mitochondrial bioenergetics in vitro. The uncoupling protonophoric activity will be assessed by the chemical-induced depolarization of mitochondrial membrane potential, stimulation of eyanide-insensitive state 4 respiration and acidification of the mitochondrial matrix. All experiments will be performed with freshly isolated rat liver mitochondria. Mitochondrial membrane potential will be measured using a TPP+-selective electrode. Oxygen consumption will be analyzed polarographically in a closedchamber system employing an oxygen-selective Clarke-type electrode. Protonophoric acidification of the mitochondrial matrix will be assessed with an high-sensitive pH electrode. Fatty acid metabolism We have preliminary evidence demonstrating that weak acids (both substituted and unsubstituted acrylates, phthalic acids, valproic acid, salicylic acid, etc.) inhibit the mitochondrial camitine acyltransferase I required for fatty acid oxidation. Depending on chain length, this inhibition of translocase activity results from the depletion of either the cytosolic or mitochondrial coenzyme A due to the formation of thioester of CoA with the corresponding acid. We expect that many perfluoroalkyl acids and their derivatives are also capable of forming thioester of coenzyme A, thereby inhibiting fatty acid oxidation. It is quite possible that this interference with fatty acid metabolism may be responsible for the well-characterized peroxisome proliferating effect reported for many of the perfluoroalkanes. 04135 7 April 8, 1997 sulfonaAmcicdoerddienrgivlayt.ivwees opnroppaolsmeittioc satcuiddyotxhiedaetfifoenctbyofinptearcftlruaotroloivcetranmeitsouclhfoonndirciaa.cidWaendwiiltls anempt to distinguish whether any deficit is due to inhibition of acyl-CoA synthase or camitine acyl-CoA translocase by varying the substrate for beta-oxidation between palmitic acid, palmitoyl CoA, and palmitoyl carnitine. We will also determine whether the perfluorocompounds deplete mitochondrial coenzyme A, suggesting the formation oaf thioester. Furthermore, we can identifya specific effect on fatty acid oxidation by demonstrating an inhibitionofmitochondrial respiration using palmitoyl carnitine as substrate, but not when either glutamate or succinate are substrates. This isolates the deficit to the acyl-CoA dehydrogenase flavoprotein, independent of effects on any other portion of the mitochondrial electron transport chain. 2. IDENTIFY POTENTIAL BIOMARKERS OF TOXIC TISSUE DAMAGE ASSOCIATED WITH IN VIVO EXPOSURE TO N-ETHYL PERFLUOROOCTANE SULFAMIDO ETHANOL Identification of potential biomarkers of toxic tissue damage is based on a thorough understandingofthe mechanismsofaction of these agentsasexplored in Aim 1 of this proposal. `Therefore, it isn't possible at this time to describe the precise details regarding which biomarkers 10 use to monitor in vivo exposure and toxic tissue damage. The ultimate experimental plan for identifying specific biomarkers is contingent on the outcome of the experiments listed in Aim 1. The results will provide a sound basis for discussing the most probable markers and for designing future experiments to address dose-response relationships in an attempt to define margins of safety in exposed populations. Biomarkers ofmitochondrial uncoupling and liberationof oxygenfree radicals Although the expression of oxidative stress in vitro is very well characterized, attempts to identify a quantitative biomarkeroftissue damage in vivo have met with limited success. One of the most promising markers that most consistently yields correlations to the extent of oxidative stress is the accumulation of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (80HG) adducts to mitochondrial DNA (mDNA), which can be measured in circulating peripheral lymphocytes. There isa large and growing body of evidence that demonstrates a progressive accumulation of SOHAG adducts to 04136 3 April 8, 1997 FMuIrDthNeArmowriet,h tahgeer(a2te0-o2f4)."mgiitvoicnhgonrdirsieatloatghiengw"idcealny bheelidnftlhueeonrcyedofby"meintvoicrhoonndmreinatlalageixnpgo"su[r2e3s].. We've recently following acute demonstrated exposures to an organ-specific and preferential oxidation of cardiac adriamycin in vivo. Similar organotropic oxidations of miDNA mIDNA. have been reported for many other genotoxic carcinogens. In fact, Takagi et al [24] report a 2- tfroeladteidncarceuatseely8wOitHhApGerafldudourcotosctoafnoniucclaeciadr.DBNasAed(onnDNouAr)exinpelriiveenrcs,e,bwute neoxtpekcitdtnheayts,thefrSoOmHrIatGs adducts of mDNA would have been 2-10 times higher had the mitochondria been examined. For this perfluorooctane aim, we sulfamido will investigate ethanol causes the whether exposure of rats in preferential oxidation of mtDNA vivo to in liver, N-ethyl more so wthiatnh ivnaroytihnegr doorsgeasnsofwhthiecpheerxfhliubiotromcionmipmoaulndoragnadnokpialtlheyda.tdRiaftfserweinltl tbiemeisnjtehcetreedafitnetrr.apTehrietotniesasluleys will be harvested and the nDNA and miDNA extracted from the corresponding cell fractions. 8OHAG adducts will be quantified by HPLC/EC and the results expressed as the ratio of mDNA/MDNA adducts. We expect to observe a dose-dependent accumulation of SOHAG adducts to mDNA. Once we establish an effective single acute dose, we plan to repeat the dosing experiments on a sub-chronic basis, where the rats will receive multiple low daily doses. Subsets of animals will be killed at various dosing intervals and the total amount of DNA adducts expressed as a function of the "cumulative" dose. To experiments, we will characterize the persistence of the DNA adducts. complete Rats will the dosimetry be exposed to a cumulative dose of perfluorocompound that is known to cause a modest degree of DNA oxidation. They will then be allowed varying periods of exposure-free recovery prior to sacrifice and measuring DNA adducts. Being that mitochondria lack the proficient DNA repair enzymes found in the nucleus, we expect that the mtDNA adducts will persist for some time after dosing. Such a phenomenon will be of great advantage in providing a lasting measure of past and repeated exposure histories. "We also will screen for the induction of several carly response genes that are known to be induced in response proliferators [15-17]. to mitogenic and/or oxidative stress, including the classic peroxisome These include GST Ya. metallothionein ILA, c-fos, NFxB, GADDI53 and GADDAS, ps3, HSP70, and GRPTS, all of which are available commercially (Xenometrix). Differential induction of these genes will reveal important insight into discrete modes of action, specifically distinguishing between oxidative stress, genotoxicity, and induction of cell proliferation, 9 04137 April 8, 1997 types will be mitochondrial compared membrane in terms of their sensitivity to chemical-induced potential, depletion of ATP, increased fatty acyl depolarization of oxidase activity, induction of the early response genes and death. The comparisons between species the will peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor, be both qualitative and quantitative, and cell responsTehoef fgiunialneoabjpeicgtsivaendwirlaltsbeextpoocsoemdpianreviv(oagtaoinN-beotthhylqupaelriftaltuiovreoloyctaannde qsuualnftaitmaitdioveeltyh)antohle exposure. The objective will be to gauge the appropriateness of the representative surrogate for estimating potential human health risks. respective species as a Using the biomarkers oidnentthiefieadccinumAuilmat2i,owneowfil8l OcoHmApGareadadnudctcsonttorasmtDthNeAe,ffecsttsimoufliantivoinvooefxpeoasrulryerteosvpaornysienggednoesse,s stimulation of fatty acyl activated receptor gene. CoA oxidase activity, Dosing regimens will and induction of the peroxisome proliferatorresemble those described for Aim 2 and the ctahlectuilsastueedsehfifsetcotliovgeidcoalsleysfcoormepvairdeedncbeetowfepeenrsopxeicsieosm.e Tproolciofmerpalteimonenitn othnies,owrebowtilhlsaplescoieesx.amIitnies these experiments that will determine species for regulatory purposes. the suitability of the rat as a representative surrogate SUMMARY - The ultimate goal of the proposed investigation is to provide a scientifically sound basis for managing the potential risks associated with human exposures to perfluoroalkyl acids and their derivatives. proliferation The existing evidence suggests and non-genotoxic carcinogenicity that may regulation on the be overly restrictive basis in that of peroxisome these responses pairgesu,ndioqguse,toorrpartsimaantdesm,icien.cluTdhienrgehiusmlaintlse.evTihdeenpcreotpoosseupdpionrvtestthiisgabtiioolnogiiscadlesriegacnteidvittoy pirnogvuiidneeaa scientific basis to support or refute such a through the succession of steps needed claim. The individual aims will to identify valid biomarkers to walk the investigation make the appropriate siumrpraocgtatoenstpheecireesgucloamtpiaorniosfontsh.eseAsimspuocrht,anttheprinovdeuscttisg,atniootnohnalsy tihnedpeostiegnntiianlgoefffheacvtiivneg maopnriotfooruinndg Tphreogurragmesnctoy ifnosrusruecwhoirnkfeorrmsaatfieotny.isbuhtigahllsioghftoerdsbetytitnhge gfuacitdetlhiatn,es1)topesraffleugouraoarldkcy!onasciudmsearnhdeatlhtehi,r derivatives are known to have the potential to be toxic, and 2) residues have been detected in the sera of production individuals? The workers. proposed The pressing investigation question is: will provide What is the information margin critical of to safety for these answering this question. n 04138 REFERENCES April 8, 1997 2I+ AKSecclthlaneerl,1i1Bm0aJ2n.:n2,M37aR-r.2Gs.4m4aa,nn,d DM.aSn.n,iPnogp,p,ROJ..A.(,1a9n9d0)ThBuiorcmhainm.BBAi"oph(y1s9.9A2c)taBi1o0c1h6i:m3.44B-i3o4ph8y.s. 3 3$ P1a0s9t.oor. TP. Lee. KP. Perri. M.A. and Gilles, PJ. (1987) Exptl. Mol. Pathol. 47: 98GAoaeon (1979) Tech. Report No. 723, 3M Central Analytical Laborat 6 JDoehvnecskloeon-p.FmleIonDmt.,CaConrMdpo.Orabatenirdo.nR,ReoDM,a.tNt.a(Vw1.a9n7(,51)M99IS6)tudCyheNmo.. R1e3s7.-T09o3.sTeaiocyr6r8o9oi-rn6yc,0)5S.tR.esPaeualr,cMhNa,nd 7. Dainsnpiosn1.g9.:R2O0.3-2B1u1c.kner, 1.V., Mispagel, ME. and Bowen, 1M, (1990) Drug Metab. 8. 9 NGGoooll.ddee1nn3tt7hh-aa0ll8,,5,EELLIn,,teJJmeeasstssiuuoppn,,aDDl..CRC..e,,seGGaeeriilcl,,hRRa..nGGd..,,DaeJnevfdefleorspomnMee,hnsNitn.g7D.C.o8,rpao0nrad0tAi5rocn,eoM,aRtJi.awa(n1,97M8I). Study 10. TAIsonhtmlepamkanitdni,so,OnfaElCR.ese(a1r9c9h0)andLaDbe.vSetluodpymeNnot.CWoIrEpoCrIa5t7i0on0,2,MaWttiawRano,sMeI.nStLaubdoyraNtoo.ri1es3,7-I0n9c2.,, 11. 12. MTirlilmsmteonre,,TNJW.. (1990) Lab. Project ID 247254, Exxon Biomedical Sciences, Inc., East Trimmer, TW. (1990) Lab. Project No. 147209, Exxon Biomed 1l4a.. RHMiealolusgtNoh.nVoe.,m,BN.N.J.aarnadyaSnpaynd,evLo.,ldK,liOn.g,(1K9.9B2.), 86: I-11, aBnidocAhdiimn.cBhizoapdheysh. ical Sciences, MA.ct(a1919162)5:65To-72. Inc., East 13. (P1i9ne9a6u), BTi..ocHhuedmg.inPsh,arWmaRc,ol.Li5u2,: L6,59C-6h6e7n., L.-C., Sher, T., Gonzlez, F.J., xicol. Letters and Samid, D. 16. 17. paLnmedadNcwihicehtro,,lsS,D.1EW...JWo.Bhencs(ko1,n9,9R6T.),.ECS.a,cnhWcoaemgrankReeerrs,,. L5.6K:.,32P5a7u-l3e3y6,4.C.J, Manam, S.1., and Kenny, C.V. S. Galloway, S.M,, 1193.; RH1P8eah:adwrdk4myi4a.ncsoJ,lK.J.M1a4.n3:dJLo1an4le3ws-a,1n5Wi0.,,EN..,DB.on(n1e9r8,3)F-CWR.CanCdriGtibRseov.n,TGoxri.col(.191(28:179)19.75D)5r.uToxicol. Appl. 20. PRhiacrhmear1c,.o5lL1..5,.1P4r1i:ce3,5S..4,3.Chesne, C., Maita, K. and Carmichael, N. (1996) g Metab. Rev. Toxicol. Appl. 2221. 23.7 CQUocmnktenoeapra,Rs.sRiaKyn,dG.BAKra.oi,nkfaSumhsia,bna,RtaMM,..N.a(W1n9.d9,B6a)SsosFo,nENgB,MS.NL.etW(t.1e9r9sa3n3)d89HA:ecp2a1ah9t.ro2lc2ot3g,yhe18: 669-676. #4. TAackaadg.i,SeiA..(USSaiA.)K8.9,: Letters 57; 55-60. U7m3e70m7i3r7a4,, T.. Hasegawa, R. and Kurokawa, (1992) Proc. Natl. Y. (1991) Cencer 25. Bojes. HK. and Thurman, RG. (1996) Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol, 140: 322-327. 04139 2