Document B8JEjDg5VGqDY49vYBqDL1Z14

From: To: Sent: Subject: Attachments: Berkoski, Daniel T CIV NAVSEA, SEA 05 Fletcher, Steven G CIV NAVSEA HQ, SEA 05 5/4/2016 1:10:16 PM FW: DON PFC/PFAS Strategy Road Map - edits and responses to comments 16-05-03, DON PFC Strategy - Consolidated Comments and responses.docx; 16-05-03, Resposnes to NMCPHC Comments on DON PFC Strategy - outline.docx; 16-05-05, Response to Additional Navy comments on the Strategy Compiled.docx ......Original Message...... From: Mach, Richard CIV OASN (EI&E), ODASN (Environment) Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 8:55 AM To: Adelson, Jordan M CIV SEA04X, LQAO; Barclift, David J CIV NAVFAC LANT, EV; Berkoski, Daniel T CIV NAVSEA, SEA 05; Blodgett, Wayne CIV NAVFAC HQ, EV; Brant, Byron C CIV NAVFAC LANT, EV; Brown, Kim P CIV NAVFAC HQ, EV; Carlson, Margaret M CIV OASN (EI&E), OAGC (EI&E); Coghlan, Gunarti H CIV NAVFAC HQ, ENV; Corack, Jennifer M CIV NAVFAC Atlantic, EV; Derrick, Amy E CAPT CHINFO, DCI; Duchnak, Laura S CIV NAVFAC HQ, BRAC PMO; Dumenigo, Mario O CIV NAVFAC HQ, EV; Frederickson, Joshua M CIV OPNAV, N45; Gamache, Christopher D CIV l&L, GF; Greek, Patricia Z CIV CNIC, N452; Hayes, Dan E CIV NAVFAC HQ, EV; Heilman, David H CIV NAVFAC HQ, BRAC PMO; Holmes, Wanda L CIV OPNAV, N45; Hunstad, Mary P CIV NAVSEA HQ, SEA 05; Jaime Vega (jaime.vega2.mil@mail.mil); Laitila, Jeffrey P CIV NAVFAC MIDLANT, EV; Lansdale, Lawrence L CIV NAVFAC HQ, BRAC PMO; Nashold, Elizabeth A CIV NAVFAC MIDLANT, EV BLC; Nehm, Lindsay R CIV OPNAV, N45; Onyekanne, Chika LT CHINFO, OI-2; Porter, Christine H CIV CNIC HQ, N45; Preston, Gregory C CIV NAVFAC HQ, BRAC PMO; Puckett, Thomas G CIV CNIC HQ, OGC; Reisch, Timothy A CIV NAVFAC LANT, EV; Rosen, Marc S CDR OLA, LA-63; Rudroff, Jim CIV OASN (EI&E), ODASN Environment; Runyon, Rex A CIV PA; Sadorra, Robert A CIV NAVFAC HQ, EV; Schirmer, Robert G CIV NAVFAC MIDLANT, EV; Taplin, Aundrea E CIV OASN (EI&E), OAGC EI&E; Turner, Misha GS13 l&L, LFL; Walker, Yvonne P. (CIV) Subject: DON PFC/PFAS Strategy Road Map - edits and responses to comments All, Thank you for the many edits, comments, and suggestions regarding version 1 of this strategy road map. We spent a lot of time reviewing and addressing your input. Attached are 3 files that show how the majority of comments were addressed. In the next couple days I plan to smooth the strategy road map (first attachment) and will distribute version 2. Our plan is this will be a living document and as decisions are made on paths forward, this will be updated and subsequent policy or direction will be issued. Since there were so many comments and in a couple different formats, I want to let you know what the attachments mean. 1. If there was a comment and it was addressed with edited text (in first attachment), I deleted the comment as it was addressed and you will see the change in tracked changes. For the second and third attachments, I responded to the comments and made any specific edits in attachment 1. 2. If a comment was not addressed, I added a response to the comment describing why it was not addressed or how it would be considered in the future. 3. If there were multiple, similar comments, I deleted some and responded to a couple for context. If as you review responses to your comments and changes to the document, you feel I did not address your concern, please let me know. I am happy to discuss, and we want to do this right. There are many moving parts here, so we are trying to keep them all aligned as we move forward. VR, Richard US00005351