Document B5D0oqqgjmydKb4XgLr2J45zE
FILE:-*
K--1711 K-2197
:tT'
P
598$ ft 983]
K-9388-f1
K-9387-
R8tS 024609
Chert'.-Biol, Interactions. 43 (1983) 33--66 Elsevitr Scientific Publishers Ireland Ltd.
33
METABOLISM AND RELATIVE CARCINOGENIC POTENCY OF CHLOROETHYLENES: A QUANTUM CHEMICAL STRUCTUREACTIVn'Y STUDY
G.H. LOEW, E. KURKJIAN and M. REBAGLIATI
SRI International, Life Sciences Division, 333 Rauenswood Avenue, Menlo Park, CA. 9*025 (U.S.A.)
(Revived December 14th, 1981) (Revision received June 11th, 1982) (Accepted June 27th, 1982)
a> ro
S' o O n>
1
SUMMARY
Properties of six chloroethylenes which could serve as indicators of their relative metabolic behavior and carcinogenic activity have been calculated using Modified Neglect of Diatomic Overlap (MNDO), a semiempirical, all valence electron, molecular orbital method. Possible pathways of trans formation of parent compounds to acylchlorides, chloroaldehydes and epoxides -- their putative ultimate carcinogens -- were considered, and heats of formation and relative stabilities of intermediates were calculated. Our results indicate that carbonyl compounds could be formed with and without the intermediacy of epoxides, suggesting the possibility of more than one pathway in activation of parent compounds. Electronic properties of carbonyl products and epoxide carhocations, putative ultimate carcinogens which could serve as indicators of their relative electrophilicities, were also calculated. The results obtained indicated that the relative extent of meta bolism to carbonyl products, rather than their electroph'licity, is a determi nant of the relative carcinogenic activity of the parent compound. Of the various thermodynamic criteria investigated, four were found to be indi cators of both relative metabolic behavior and carcinogenic activity.
Key leords: Carcinogenicity -- Chloroethylenes Structure activity -- Vinylchloride
Quantum chemical --
Abbreviations: LUMO, lowest unoccupied molecular orbital; MMDO. Modified Neglect of Diatomic Overlap; UHF, Unrestricted Hartree-Fock.
0009-2797/83/0000-0000/S03.00 1983 Elsevier Scientific Publishers Ireland Ltd. Printed and Published in Ireland
R4S 024610
INTRODUCTION
The ethylene chlorides are widely used in industry as degreasers, solvents and cleaning fluids. Recent interest in these compounds has been generated by the observations that vinyl chloride and some of its analogs cause cancer in laboratory animals [1--3], Vinyl chloride is potentially harmful to humans as well. Studies of workers who handle vinyl chloride have shown serious increase in expected tumor incidence and mortality [4,5], Also of significance is the finding that these compounds fail in the Ames muta genicity test. This test shows the ethylene chlorides to be only weakly muta genic even though they are carcinogens [6].
Research on vinyl chloride (monochloroethylene) has shown that, like many carcinogens, it does not directly cause cancer. Instead, it is meta bolized to reactive electrophilic intermediates which act as the ultimate carcinogens [7], This has been found to be true for the more highly chlori nated ethylcnes as well (8].
Despite extensive studies of two prototype compounds, vinyl chloride and vinylidene chloride (1,1-dichlorocthylene), many questions regarding the mode of action of haloethylones as chemical carcinogens and the properties which determine their relative activity remain unresolved. For example, it is not clear whether epoxides or acylchlovides and chloroaldehydes are the ultimate carcinogens. In addition, the mode of formation of chloroaldehydes and acylchloridcs from parent compounds and the involvement of the epoxides as intermediates are not clear. Finally, the relative importance of metabolism and reactivity of ultimate carcinogens with tissue macromolecules in determining carcinogenic activity ol parent compounds has not been established.
In this study we have used the techniques of theoretical chemistry to investigate properties of the six ethylene chloride compounds and their intermediates which could be reliable indicators of their extent of biotrans formation to active carcinogens and of the ease of adduct formation of the putative ultimate carcinogen with nucleic acid components. Because these compounds require biotransformation to reactive ultimate carcinogens, these two types of properties should be important in determining the relative carcinogenic potency of the parent compounds. If such properties could be identified find calculated, they would serve two purposes: (1) further elucidation of the mechanism of chemical carcinogenicity of unsaturated aliphatic halohydrocarbons; (2) provide a basis for development of a rapiu screening procedure for predicting at least the, presence or absence of activity in unknown compounds of this lype.
In previous work we have performed such mechanistic structure-activity studies of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their amine and methyl derivatives and were able to identify reliable molecular indicators of relative metabolism and carcinogenic activity [9], The selection of such indicators was based on existing knowledge of the mechanism? of bictransformations, leading to the ultimate carcinogens in a given class of compounds and of the
: rs, solvents i generated
. iuse cancer larmful to
. mve shown >]. Also of
: mes mutaakly muta-
that, like it is metae ultimate ;hly chlori-
j\ chloride larding the properties imn|Ait is es l^^he aldehydes nt of the ortancc of molecules not been
. imistry to and their f biotrans-
. ion of the . iuse these
;ens, these ie relative ; could be ) further isatu rated if a rapid if activity
e*activity d methyl ; >f relative .1 ndicators r rmations, a nd. of the
-j
<3
interactions of the ultimate carcinogens with tissue macromolecules that could lead to carcinoma.
While there are many unknown aspects of the transformation of unsatu rated halohydrocarbcns to their active forms and the role of competing detoxification pathways, direct evidence for the involvement of cytochrome P-450 in the oxidation of vinyl chloride and vinylidenc chloride is substantial [10--13], Less is known about the more highly chlorinated ethylcncs and the role of P-450 here can only be inferred. Indirect evidence, however, supports this hypothesis [14--16].
As shown in Fig. 1, the first step in enzymatic transformation of the chloroethylenes is generally thought to be oxidation by cytochrome P-450 by asymmetric addition of a radical oxene species to the carbon-carbon double bond of the substrate [17,18], A radical mechanism is favored by studies of isotope effects on rates of reaction [19] and by the `suicide sub strate' action of vinyl chloride. During the biotransformation of vinyl chloride by P-450, a reactive species is formed that can react with the heme group and destroy the enzyme [20], A radical intermediate can potentially cause this destruction. This `suicide substrate' action is also suspected for other chloroethylenes [21]. Our own previous mechanistic studies a'so favor a radical mechanism [22,23],
The biradical formed can then either isomerize by H or Cl atom shifts, forming stable acylchlorides and aldehydes or ring close to form an epoxide. Further, if the epoxides are exposed to aqueous environment, there is strong evidence that they isomerize to acylchlorides and chloroaldehydes by H and Cl' 1,2 shifts [24],
Fin. 1. Schematic summary of metabolism of chloroethylenes.
36
Alternatively, epoxides can undergo enzymatic or non-onzymatic hydroly-
sis. Some evidence for hydrolysis products of trichloroethylene and tetra-
chloroethylenc epoxide exist; chloral hydrate has been reported as a
metabolic product of trichloroethylene and oxalic acid as the tetrachloro-
ethylene metabolite [12,14,25). However, the relative amounts of these
products and whether their formation is a direct result of hydrolysis is
uncertain.
F'inally, other enzymes such as glutathione S-transferase have been impli
cated in either activation or detoxification processes [26--281 involving
epoxide or carbonyl compounds, but evidence for their involvement is
much'' less clear than that for F-450. Oxidation and reduction of the
aldehydes to alcohols and acids are known to occur (2`J) and these products
are among the major metabolites found.
There is substantial evidence that the ultimate carcinogens are the acyl-
chlorides or aldehydes [20,30--32]. However, the epoxides have also been
implicated [20,30--32], Both the chlorocpoxides and aldehydes are
electrophilic enough to form adducts with nucleophilic sites of DN'A, and
evidence for such adducts comes from extensive in vitro and in vivo studies
with vinyl chloride [30,51,33,34], Two types of DNA adducts, shown in
Fig. 2, have been identified, Type JL from in vitro and in vivo studies with vinyl
chloride and DNA from a variety of species [20--31] and Type 2_ most recently found in animals exposed to vinyl chloride 134], As shown in
ro
Fig. 2, the nature of these adducts provides direct evidence that chloro-
aldehyde is the adduct-forming metabolite. However, as also shown in this
figure, the N7-adduct 2 could also be formed by a carbocation of the
epoxide which attacks N7 with loss of HC1 from the adjacent carbon. If
formation of such adducts is important in tumor formation, then acyl-
chlorides and chloroaldehydes are likely active forms of ethylene chlorides,
with or without the intermediacy of epoxides.
It should be pointed out that DNA alkylation is not the only proposed
mechanism for chemical carcinogenesis. One proposed alternative is an
`epigenetic' mechanism. According to this hypothesis, widespread alkylation
of macromolecules by the reactive intermediates causes destruction of tissue.
The increased DNA synthesis required to make new tissue would be
accompanied by an increase in spontaneous mutations and thus an increa.w
in tumor formation [35], While some rece< 1 evidence favours this mecha
nism for tetrachloroethylene [35], more work is needed to establish its
relevance. In general the bulk of evidence points to a more specific effect
on tissue macromolecules involving an electrophilic intermediate as the
ultimate carcinogen, a criterion which is fulfilled by the chloroepoxide or
carbonyl products.
Table 1 presents a summary of the relevant metabolic data. For all
chloroethylencs, the oxidized and reduced products of the chloroacetal-
dehyde and chloroacetylchloride derivatives have been identified as
metabolites. There have been no in vivo studies done involving identification
of metabolites of cw- and trons-l,2-dichloroethylene. However, preliminary'
m studies on perfused rat livers show small amounts of dichloroacetic ac'.d
ira m a w fWBwa:mimmtmh KS'itsm st
matic hydrolylene and tetra* reported as a he tetrachloroiunts of these f hydrolysis is
ive been impli-28] involving involvement is uction of the these products
only proposed ernative is an read alkylation ction of tissue, sue would be ius an increase trs this mccha,o establish its specific effect rediate as the .oroepoxide or
data. For all ? chloroacetal-
identified as ; identification _*r, preliminary
;ctic acid
a
DNA
-Cl**
\
H--
C C/
N
I
dcoxy r.bosc
1 ,/V* ETHENODEQXY-ADENOSINE
deoxyrjbose 7-A/ (2 0X0ETHYL)-DE0XYGUAN0SlNE
l2
Fig, 2. Identified adducts of vinyl chloride metabolites with adenosine and guanosine.
produced [24], Table I also shows percentage unchanged parent compound recovered after in vivo metabolism. The values shown are from a variety of studies [16,24,26,27,36--42]. From the diverse studies reported, the percentage of unchanged parent compound appears to depend on factors such as dose, species of animal used and perhaps route of administration as well as details of methodology. There were gaps in many of these studies and only one investigated all six parent compounds [36],
The results of all these studies indicate that the extent of metabolism decreases generally with increasing degree of halogen substitution. The rank order of metabolism is: vinyl chloride ~ vinylidene chloride > trans-1,2-
diehloroethylene ~ c/s-dichloroethylene > trichloroethylene > tetrachloroethylene, with one inhalation study in rats [36] allowing us to place cis- and
frans*l,2-dichlorocthyleno in this rank order. Quantitative conclusions about the carcinogenic potency of these com
pounds cannot be made at this time due to lack of available data. Data available in the literature allows formulation of, at best, a tentative rank order of carcinogenic potency vinyl chloride > vinylidene chloride > tetrachloroethylene > trichloroethylene, with not enough information available
38
K- Hll
K-4383 K-Wti'l r - a S'Xc K 3,33.1
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF THE OBSERVED PRODUCTS AND EXTENT OF OXJDATIVE METABOLISM OF CHLOROLTHYLENES
1 j Parent
|rt(*frrr#Oil* KYlChlOntja/ 1 ctiior<Mc*tal<j**ycl
final obut vrd (iruOuC)
Ml H
\
/ H V**l
t, /
\ Cl
H0
\ // ci p-5 -- c
\
H
dO
\/ ci p-5 -c
\ M OH
(Ml
H \
Cl /
/\ H Cl
Vm,(>lu<p|f
H
\
ci p-.5
h"
0
\ o
H \
Ci p-c
H
/
OH
(Jmint1t?*cl In v*VCs
!MI|
Cl \
Cl /
/\ HH
(I* 1,7 OwNI4M<^W4
H V
Cl c- c
Cl
0
/ -c
\ H
MV|
Ct H \/ c^c /\
M Cl
h
c, o'
--c \ n
H o"
\t
Cl P- c --c
\
o Cm
--.----------
H \
C< C
c
0* /,
\1 Oh
|V|
C Cl \/ / "\
\/ --e
\ Cl'
(VII
Cl o
\c
J
--c
/\
ci ci
T < *e NVTO*11V1nil
CI 0
\i
Oc^5 -c \
Cl c>
Cl o' \ //
ci p*5 "-C \
c-' Oh
1
Cl r> \t
ci p-5 --C \
Cl OH
* Percent or unchanged parent compound depends on four factors: (1) Dose (higher dose, greater % unchanged). (2) Species, c.g,, rat, mice, human; in general, metabolism greater in mice than rats. (3) Route of administration, i.e., inhalation/oral; though studies are conflicting on this point. (4) Detailed methodology used.
b Range of percent unchanged; 1--2% oral administration, 0.05--1 mg/kg in male rats [26], 2% inhalation 10 ppm male rats [37 ], 4% by intragastric administration 250 mg/ kg [42], But note 67% unchanged in oral administration of 100 mg/kg in male rats [26].
e < 1% Intragastric administration of 350 mg/kg in male rat.-. [27]. d Calculated concentration of parent compound after 9 h in the tissue compartment on
exposure of male rats by inhalation to a constant level of 100 ppm, relative to vinyl chloride [36].
' 80--90% Unchanged in oral administration in rats [38]. 1 27% Unchanged in inhalation studies of humans [39], *70% Unchanged by oral and inhalation studies in rats [40], 98% Unchanged by ora!
administration in rats and 82% in mice [38]. b Products detected in metabolic studies of perfused liver [24] and liver microsomes
[41]. 1 Some trichloroethanol is also observed.
R&S 024614
I'&QVv.
OXIDATIVE
(higher dose, )olism greater >h studies are
in male rnts ition 250 mg/ tale rats [26]. ipartment on stive to vinyl inged by oral
microsomes
39
to place cis- and trans-1,2-dichloroethyleno in this order. As with relative metabolism, carcinogenic potency roughly decreases with increasing degree of halogen substitution.
Though many sources were consulted, our rank order is based mainly on work done by C. Nlaltoni and coworkers [1--3,43--45] and by the National Cancer Institute [46,47]. The order VC > VDC was made on the basis ol reported inhalation studies and the order tetra- > trichloroethylene on the basis of the NCI feeding and gavage bioassays. The laboratory of Dr. Bruce Ames has also used the NCI bioassays to rank tetra- > trichloroethylene in carcinogenic activity in female mice as part of their comprehensive project to select reliable carcinogenic studies from the literature and represent carcinogenic activity in quantitative form. In one study, vinylidene chloride and tri- and tetrachloroethylene were evaluated in mice [4 8] and this study was used to rank vinylidene chloride > tri- or tetrachloroethylenes, allowing the tentative tanking of the four compounds given above. This rank order is very tentative due to several problems in evaluating these data. No study has been done which includes all six chloroerhylenes. Different routes of administration and different dose ranges made comparison indirect. Also, some compounds show species specificity. For example, tetrachloroethylene is carcinogenic in mice but not in rats. In general, the rank order was obtained from results with female mice, which were the most susceptible species.
To select fundamental molecular properties which might be reliable indi cators of the relative metabolism and carcinogenic activity of these com pounds, the following assumptions were made: (1) l1-450 oxidation is the initial step of transformation leading to the active carcinogenic forms, (2) Acylchlorides and chloroaldehydes can be formed directly from radical products of /M50 oxidation or via an epoxide intermediate in an aqueous environment. (3) Acylchlorides and chloroaldehydes are candidate active carcinogenic forms which act as electrophiles in forming adducts with nucleophilic sites of DNA bases. (4) Carbocations formed from protonated epoxides could also be active carcinogenic forms which can form adducts with DNA if they are prevented from facile rearrangement to aldehydes. (5) Properties related to extent of metabolism of the parent compound to the active form and the electrophilicity of the putative ultimate carcinogen could be lcliablc indicators of their relative carcinogenic behavior.
In addition to these general assumptions, to select properties relevant to extent of metabolism of parent compounds, we have used three possible pathways for oxidative metabolism of the chlorinated ethylencs to active carcinogens formulated from existing experimental and theoretical evidence; these are shown in Fig. 3. The initial step (a) common to all subsequent transformations is P-450-mediated addition of triplet oxygen across the carbon-carbon double bond yielding a triplet biradical. We propose that there are then two possible fates for this biradical. In Pathway l.the initial triplet radical directly isomcrizes via a chlorine or hydrogen atom 1,2 shift (lb). The rearranged triplet can then undergo intersystem crossing (le) to form the product carbonyl compound. Thus, in Pathway 1, formation of
R&S 024615
!
41
acylchloridcs and chloroaldehydes and their oxidation and reduction
products does not proceed through an epoxide intermediate. However, in
an alternate path (Pathway II), the initial triplet radical can undergo
ringlet-triplet intersystem crossing (lib) and the resultant singlet biradical
species can isomerize to form the putative carbonyl ultimate carcinogen
(lie) or can close to form an intermediate epoxide (lid). The epoxide
could then be further transformed to ehloroaldehydes in solution
(Pathway HI), providing an alternate, ionic pathway to formation of the
rldehyde products. In this proposed pathway, the epoxide ring is protonated
Ilia) and the ring opens (IIIb). The carbocations formed undergo 1, 2 H* or
11" ion shifts (IIIc) similar to those involving radical species and the re
arranged product loses a proton (IIIcl) to form the carbonyl compound.
In our studies we have calculated enthalpies of reaction for each of these
jostulated mechanisms (Pathways I, II and III of Fig. 3) as possible indi-
ators of their relative extent of total metabolism. By comparing calculated
alues of enthalpies of reaction corresponding to each pathway with known
netabolic behavior, it was possible to identify those values which are the
nost reliable indicators of relative extent of metabolism to known products
nd thus to further elucidate the mechanisms of biotransformation of
;ie parent chlorocthylenes to carbonyl products.
As discussed, the nature of the two types of adducts isolated and identi-
ed from vinyl chloride administration in vivo and in vitro (Fig. 2) most
i
erectly implicates the carbonyl compounds as the active carcinogens, lowever, it is possible that the carbocation of the epoxide formed by
mg opening of the protonated epoxide (Step Illb, Fig. 3) could also be
he ultimate carcinogen. While this possibility is less likely due to the facile
earrangement of these carbocations to aldehydes, these carbocations are
dso considered as putative ultimate carcinogens m this study. Properties of
>oth types of putative ultimate carcinogens, aldehydes and epoxides, which
ould serve as measures of their electrophilicity and hence ease of formation
of known adducts with nucleic acid bases were also calculated.
Among these two classes of properties, reliable indicators of relative
-arcinogenic activity were identified which could be useful in screening
ior carcinogenic activity in related untested compounds.
These results suggest that, while there may be other activating path
ways, the P-450-mitigated ones chosen here are important. Further experi
mental tests of the reliability of the molecular indicators of activity
identified here would provide additional verification of the importance of
the underlying mechanism upon which they are based.
CHOICE OF MOLECULAR INDICATORS OF RELATIVE CARCINOGENIC ACTIVITY
(1) Properties relative to extent of transformation of chlorocthylenes to active forms
Differences in calculated heats of formation A(AHf) among various
R&S 024618
/'-A A':/,' 1 .
42
species in the three proposed pathways to the ultimate carcinogen were used as indicators of the relative extent of metabolism of each of the six chloroethylenes to their active form. These properties are related only to electronic factors which can influence the extent of transformation of parent compounds. The effect of transport or steric factors at the enzyme active site were not included. All of the species for which heats of formation were calculated are minima (i.e., reactants, intermediates or products), rather than transition states in each reaction pathway. For example, minima in Path way 1 arc: parent compound, triplet radical, isomerized triplet radical and the carbonyl product. The calculated difference in enthalpy of formation between two minima is related to an enthalpy of reaction rather than an enthalpy of activation for each step. Thus thermodynamic, rather than kinetic, criteria are.used as a measure of relative extent of transformation of parent compounds. Such thermodynamic criteria are appropriate if each reaction is presumed to reach equilibrium. All ,l(AHf)'s for each step in the reactions were calculated for each proposed pathway.
Specifically, as a measure of the relative extent of the initial P-450 oxida tion of each parent compound, common to formation of both aldehydes and epoxides from parent compounds (Step a. Fig. 3), the staoility of the proposed radical intermediate relative to the parent compound was used:
A (A Hf )tnp!et-parcnt = A Hf (triplet radical) - AHf(parent)
Then, following Pathway 1 to formation of aldehydes, heats of formation were calculated for all geometry optimized isomerized triplet biradicals and their carbonyl products. The radicals result from 1, 2 shifts of H and Cl atom in each initial triplet radical.
Calculated heats of formation of the isomerized radicals were then used to calculate relative isomerization energies:
A (A Ilf Jjso,-! a- ~ AHf(isomerized triplet) - AHf(initial triplet)
and to calculate the stability of the carbonyl products formed from them
A(AHf)pn,cuct radical = AHf(carbonyl product) AHf(isomerized triplet radical)
Similarly, following Pathway II to formation of epoxides, as illustrated in Fig. 3. additional heats of formation were calculated for optimized geometries of the singlet biradical and the epoxides of each parent com pound, and differences in all relevant heats of formation calculated.
As indicated in Pathway 111,epoxides can also be transformed to carbonyl products by a non-enzymatic ionic mechanism. To model the energetics of this reaction pathway, we have calculated the heats of formation of the optimized geometries of (1) ihe protonr.ted epoxides, (2) each carbocacion
>gen were of the six d only to of parent me active ition were ither than i in Pathadical and formation ;r than an ther than formation ite if each step in the
150 oxidaaldehydes lity of the was used:
t i * *
4
j;
formation adicals and nd Cl atom
ien used to
rom them:
>d triplet radical)
illustrated optimized arent com1. o carbonyl lergetics of .ion of the :arbocation
S'
formed by ring opening of the protonated epoxide and (3) isomerized carbocation resulting from a 1,2 H" and Cl" shift of each initial carbocation. Differences in heats of formation between these species and the carbonyl products were used as measures of the relative extent of such product formation via an epoxide intermediate.
Calculated values of all thermodynamic quantities were compared with the relative extent of metabolism and rank order of carcinogenic activity for all parent compounds.
(2) Electrophilic properties of putative active carcinogens Two types of properties were chosen as indicators of electrophilic activity
of acylchloridcs and ohloroaldchydes, one relevant to electrophilicity in incipient covalent bone, formation and the other to more long-range electro static interactions [49--51].
In incipient covalent bond formation, the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of the electrophile functions as the acceptor of electron density from the attacking nucleophile centers of the DNA bases. The energy of this orbital was thus chosen as a good indicator of electron transfer. In addition, the more electron density the two carbon atoms have in this orbital, the more they function as localized electrophilic centers in covalent bond formation.
Electron affinities, i.e., the energy gained in adding an electron to the neutrai form of each carbonyl product, could also have been calculated. However, since the reaction with DNA bases to form adducts does not involve addition of an electron, i.e,, reduction of the carbonyl compounds, but simply partial electron donation and covalent bond formation, there is no reason to believe that electron affinities would be a better indication of electrophilicity of the neutral compound than its ElumO-
The net charges on the two carbon atoms were chosen as monitors of their electrostatic electrophilicity. The larger the positive charge on these atoms, the greater their long range attraction to the electron-rich nitrogen atoms of the DNA bases.
An additional requirement could be that the CQ carbon must have at least one halogen atom, since in an Sj^ displacement, a good leaving group like Cl" facilitates attachment of the incoming nucleophile.
To examine the possibility that carbocations of epoxides could also be active carcinogenic forms of the ethylene chlorides, the energy of LUMO and the net charge on the cationic carbon atom of these species were also tabulated.
These calculated electrophilic properties of the putative ultimate carcino gens, together with those that indicate the extent of metabolism of tire parent compounds, provided a set of molecular properties which could be used as indicators of rank order of carcinogenic activity of the chloroethylcnes.
R&S 024619
R&S 024620
44
METHOl.'S AND PROCEDURE
All calculations made in this study were performed using an ail-valence semiempirical molecular orbital method called MNDO introduced in 1977 by Dewar and Thiel [52--54). The method is parameterized to yield reliable optimized molecular geometries for species which have a finite lifetime, i.e., a minin. m in their potential energy surfaces and the corresponding heat of formation of such snecies at 298`C. Using the MNDO method, then, optimized geometries and heats of formation were calculated for the parent chloroethylenes and all intermediates and products in the proposed path ways to their transformations to active forms indicated in Fig. 3. Total geometry optimization of radical species was performed using a MNDO Unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) formalism [55] suitable for species with unpaired electrons; heats of formation, spin densities and electron densities were calculated. This method underestimates the individual heats of forma tion of radicals by as much as 20 keal/mol, However, errors tend to cancel in comparisons made for a series of similar radicals [53]; it is only such comparisons which are made in this study.
Input geometries for MNDO calculations of parent chloroethylenes and product chloroacetaldehydes and chloroacetylchlorides were taken from experimental data [56--58], Full geometry optimizations were performed. These involved optimization with respect to all geometric quantities; bond lengths, bond angles, and torsion angles. The criteria used for convergence was a maximum value kcal/A for the sum of the squares of the gradient components [52], All parent compounds and products converged to welldefined optimized geometries.
In contrast to the parent compounds and final products, there are no structural data available for the chloroethylene oxides, since they are very unstable. Input geometries were constructed from a combination of crystal structure data for ethylene oxide end stannard bond lengths and angles [57,59]. All epoxides converged to well-defined optimized configura tions.
The proposed triplet and singlet biradicals and carbocations are too reactive to have been isolated. Therefore, no experimental structural data are available for them. However, previous theoretical studies have been done for some analogs [53] and input geometries were constructed from results of these studies as well as from standard bond length and bond angle values [57]. MNDO optimized geometries of the triplet biradicals were used as input for the singlet biradical calculations. All triplet biradicals converged to well-defined optimized geometries. However, one singlet biradical, H:C t--CHCIO l, did not fully converge by our criteria. The estimated error in the vaiue of AHf obtained is 0.003 keal/mol, too small to influence the significance of the results. Similarly, as noted in Table VIII, two carboca tions did not quite converge on optimized geometries but were also esti mated to have a very small residual error.
ill-valence 1 in 1977 id reliable
lifetime, iding heat od, then, he parent sed path-
3. Total a MNDO )cies with densities of formato cancel only such
lcnes and kj^^rfroom e^^neled. riesT bond nvergence e gradient d to well-'
re are no y are very of crystal md angles configura-
is are too iturai data have been cted from rond angle were used converged
biradical, es.imated ) influence o carbocaalso esti-
*
Tables II--IV present a comparison of MNDO calculated optimized geo
metries for parent compounds, intermediate epoxides and aldehydes, respectively, with geometries obtained by using a minimum basis set (STO-3G) ab initio method [60,61] and from experimental data when available. All other calculated geometries can be obtained upon request.
A comparison of MNDO optimized geometries for parent chloroethylenes . with values obtained using the STO-3G ab initio method [61] and with experimental data [56--59] (Table II) shows that the MNDO method yields reliable geometries with all bond lengths within 0.03 A and bond angles within 3 of experimental results. The greatest discrepancies in both MNDO and STO-3G are the C-Cl bond lengths. MNDO overestimates these bond lengths by about 0.02 A, and STO-3G by 0.05 A. Where comparisons of >ond angles can be made, both methods arc accurate to about 2.
The calculated and experimental values [62,63] for the dipole moments ire also shown in Table II. Both methods overestimate the dipole moments, lowever, MNDO's values are substantially better than those obtained by the ninimum basis set ab initio method.
The accuracy of the optimized geometries obtained by MNDO calculaions for the chloroethylene oxides cannot be judged, as there is no available
xperimental data. However, calculations on these molecules have been done ising the ab initio method (Table III) [61]. Comparing results from the two nethods, the average discrepancy in C--C bond length is 0.03 A and about
for the bond angles. As with the parent compounds, there are also diffeences in the dipole moments calculated by the two methods.
Experimental structural data for the product aldehydes are limited. As seen in Table IV, MNDO's optimized structures are in good agreement with available data. As with the parent compounds, the largest discrepancies are in the bond lengths and angles of the carbon-chlorine bond. MNDO con sistently overestimates these bond lengths by about 0.03 A and maximum bond angle errors are about 3.
The accuracy of heats of formation calculated for the parent chloro
ethylenes and carbonyl p oducts is shown in Table V. While the general
agreement with experiment is good, the error increases with degree of chlorination and, for the fully chlorinated trichloroacetylchloride, is substantial.
No experimental data exist for the heat of formation of the epoxides. However, a comparison of the heats of reaction by MNDO for the trans formation of the parent to the epoxide and those done by the STO-3G methods yields an interesting result (Table V(B)). MNDO calculations give a much greater dependence of heats of formation on degree of halogen substitution than those done by STO-3G. Since MNDO is parameterized for heats of formation, it, is likely that it yields a more accurate relative result than the STO-3G method.
30 fio
(/)
oro
0ro)
TABLE II CALCULATED GEOMETRIES AND DIPOLE MOMENTS OF PARENT COMPOUNDS AND COMPARISON WITH EXPERIMENT
C' R, ,
'
,
Pi
R,
'C.---------------- c
R.
0.
Vinyl chlotide HjC--CHC1
Vinylidene chloride Cl,C--CHS
1,2 -Dichloroelhylene (c/s) HCIO--CHCl
1,2-Dichlorothylcnc ((ran*) HC1C--CHCl
Trichloro ethylene HC1C--CCI,
Tetrechloroethylene
ct.c-cct.
MNDO STO-3Gc Exp*
MNDO STO-3G' Expb
MNDO STO-3Gc Expb
1
MNDO STO-3Gc Expb
MNDO STP-3GC Exp
MNDO KTO-aa*
R, '
x.
R. R.
1.09 1.08 1.10
1.09 1.08
1.09 1.08
1.09 1.08 --
1.09 1.08 --
1.33 1.31 1.34
1.34 1.31 1.324
1.34 1.31 1.34
1.34 1.31 1.34
1.34 1.32 1.36
1.76 1.77 1 73
1.74 1.7/ 1.707
___
--
1.76 1.77 1.72
1.74 1.76 1.71
ZZ9PZ0 S'Sd
124' 122' 121'
-- --
121* 123"
--
127' 124'
--
-- ~ "
01
123' 123' 122.5
-- -- --
125.5 125
--
121' 124' 123'
124* 124' 124'
X, = H 111* 116'
X, = Cl 114' 118' 113.61
___
"
0*
___ .
-
X, = 1 113.2 115
1.86 2.34 1.25d
_
.2.13 3.02
- 1.8 O'*
-- --
X, -= C! 115' 110' 117-123.75'
X, ^ Cl
. i xr*
___
-
___ 1.13 -- 1.61 -- 0.3 Bd
o001- r.
j&StfJ
,^,4 rl/'
X
ll
o
L*
HC1C--CCI, _
Tetrechloroethylene c^c-ca.
MNDO STP-3G0 Exp
MNDO STO-3G*
1.09 1.08
1.34 k - ..1.74
1.32 -V 1.76
i;36 v.,- -*
`t-jt/Y-
1-71. * '? '
?;
1.35-V,..; : 1.74
1.33 v 1.77 > 1.33*#.'- 1.12.
TABLEIH COMPARISON OF CALCULATED GEO:.; STO-3G
>> ..l r , ' =124V' ;
.x,?ci 115* 4'
-r . 1;13
124* 124* V
-116% . i ,i 117-123.76* 1
.:4 .
4- i\-:>.*:>*. >
; ^ X, = Cl . .116* '
r;-- -S-. %otobi>^ y>rV.*<?8
-- ; W112.8*;
vAj--<*-,/*s 118*.^
1 A'TPS
[I] o /\
H,C------- CHC1
MNDO STO-3G*
[II] r. H,C------- CC1,
MNDO STO- 3G1
"'V
HOC------- CHCl (eis)
MNDO STO-3G*
EIV) u
HCiC------CHCl (fraus)
MNDO STO-3G*
m^ N
HCIC------- CCI,
MNDO STO-3G*
IVIJ n C1,C------- CCI,
" Ref. 60.
MNDO STO-3G*
R,
1.10 1.09
R.
1.52 1.48
1.10 1.08
1.52 1.49
1.10 1.09
1.52 1.49
1.10 1.52 1.09 1,4 9
1.53 1.50
-- 1.54 -- 1.51
R,
1.78 1.80
R.
1.42 1.42
121 120
1.77 1.79
1.43 1.41
122 120"
1.77 1.79
1.41 1.43
123 122"
1.79 1.41 121 1.79 1.42 121
1.77 1.79
1.41 1.41
120 119"
1.76 1.79
1.40 1.43
122 121
4, . *
P
X, = H 57 121 114 2.386 58" 119 111 2.448
x, = a
56 112 116 2.362
60" 119
113*
2.476
123 120
X, = H 109
112
2.709 2.167
X, = H
57
114
1.049
58
112"
0.458
X, = Cl
56
--
147
1.5S7
59"
--
112
1.747
57
--
110*
0.664
--
--
113
0.113
ez9frzo ssu
TABLE IV
MNDO CALCULATED GEOMETRIES OF CHLOROALDEHYDE AND ACYLCHLORIDE PRODUCTS AND COMPARISON WITH EXPERIMENT
V
HjC--CH
:;u, 1111 9
C1,HC--CC1
[HI] IIV]
oa
Cl.CCH
*Ref. 60.
MNDO
exp*
MNDO
exp*
MNDO
exp*
MNDO
exp*
R. R
-- 1.22 -- 1.22 * 0.02
1.51 1.50
1.21
1.22 0.04
1.53 1.52 t 0.04
1.205 1.21 0.04
1.534 1.52 t 0.02
1.206 1.15 t 0.02
R.
X, = H 1.11 1
X, = Cl 1.80 1.77
X, = Cl
1.79 1.74 t 0.03
--
--
R. X. = H
1.11 1.09
1.11 1.09
X, = Cl
1.79 1.76 t 0.03
X, = C!
1.79 1.76 t C.02
125' 121*
--
112.4* 113 i 3*
--
--
-- --
119"
119.57" 122 i 3"
--
--
.If
u
C1,CCH
Ref. 60.
-MNDO exp* .
1.534 1.52 t 0.02
1.206 1.15 * 0.02
X, = Cl 1.79 1.76 i 0.02
* iSSM^r 3-
b
TABLE V
COMPARISON OF MNDO CALCULATED HEATS OF FORMATION OF THE CJILOROETHYLENES, EPOXIDES, ALDEHYDES AND ACYLCHLORIDES WITH EXPERIMENTAL DATA AND WITH STO-3G AB INITIO CALCULATIONS
(A) (B)
(C)
Parent compound
aH, (MNDO) (kcal/ mol)
AHj(exp) (kcal/mol)
H.C-CHC!
4.81 . 8.1c
Corresponding epoxide
A(AH)* STO-3G*
/Ox H,C-------- CHC1
0
A(aH)* (MNDO)
0
Carbonyl compound
AH, (MNDO) (keal/mol)
9
H.C1CCH
49.67
AH, (exp) (kcal/ mol)
-61.3*
H.C-CCI,
HC1C-CC1H (*) IICIC--CC1H ((runs)
Cl ,C--CHC1
Cl.C-CCI,
-0.16 -2.82
0.61 * 0.36d 1.0 i 2.1d
-3.90 1.2 i 2.1d
-6.60 -8.21 -2.7 2.0d
H,ti----^CCI, (cii)HCiC------- CHC1
{Irons) HCid-----CHC1
CI,C-----4CHCI /0\
CI,C------- CC1,
2.92 2.45
1.95
4.89 7.18
1.00 0.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
9H.CCC1
HjCICC!
0 hci.cSh
1? HC1.CCC1
Q Cl.CCH
0 CijCfioi
-56.13 -60.33
-52.81
-60.19 -43.83 -55.45
-68.9* -51.1*
-51.1* -89.3d
* 4(4H) = (aH,
b Ref. 60.
1
- aH, p
) relative to values calculated for vinyl chloride,
1 S.W. Benson, F.R. Cruickshank, D.M. Golden, G.R. Hargen, H.E. O'Neal, A.S. Rogers, R. Shaw and R. Walsh,Chem. Rev., 69 (1909) 279.
" AD. Co* and G. Pilcher, Thermochemistry of Organic and Organometallic Compounds, Academic Press, London, 1970. * Selected Values of Chemical Thermodynamic Properties, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC.
TABLE VI
CALCULATED HEATS OF F'Ji-4ATION OF REACTANTS, PRODUCTS AND INTERMEDIATES IN PROPOSED TRANSFORMATION OF CHLOROETHYLENES TO PUTATIVE ULTIMATE CARCINOGENS: CHLOROALDEHYDES AND ACYLCHLORIDES (PATHWAY I)
AIAh,* T,,ot*1 -
Mi
HH M\/c~c/\Cl AH, Ml
28* '3 ;--o
MU
O \/ H/ \CI AH, 1ft
1 l-rmi'
H Vd
H P
C/i
AM ` 79
H
\ c
H/
/ ~CC-
AM 141
Hr 'i,
/c t
"C*.1A.
H4 VCl 0
AH - 7M
AtAH,i WHIXII#
-17 71
/ // V/ '1040
-16 60i
1 p>*l 8-*44*i
M r\c
--d
/m
/ V,.
AH, 404
\ .... C
C
H4 0
A", -189
H c- * \ C --c
AM, *8 97
AP<A4v"4,il 8w*o-<t*` AA 67
I'OMl
O\ ,,.-C
--
0 c/
t
/ \H
AH, -*887
M
44 74
N
\ .. C
4
--C/ \
AH, - -M 13
h 0 f
SI 41
\ . " ...Jc
-- C/ \Cl
AH, -*0 33
A(AH,t NAici-44 48 M} 84
-60 17
M \
P --c
841
\ ./ --C
-44 34
0 \ -- c/
-47 64
H CI
Ci' \0
\
AH, 014
AM, -1 *6
43 81
HIM
h Cl
\C*- c /
/ C'
\
AH, -
|IV|
c" CI \c-- c/ /\ AH, - -7 u
20ft
H Ci 1 /
c --c / \> 0 ct AH, *0 76
F Ci 1 /
c "C . CI* ^H0 AH, *0 7ft
-8 16
H \
/O * -61 41
H V0 AM,
i
6 70 M H
\ ./
-46 36
O'1 \ CI
AH, -7*6
H Ci 1
e i6
....\r.
4' --c
C H4 \>0
AH,
-ft 70 """
MH \ --c./
\ o0 AM, - - 7 4ft
-*S 34
H 0i
N ">c
c<
--
c \o
AH, -00 33
5ft 43
H \
0 --c/
*
c4 o
M
Ah, -42 81
H 0i
.\c
--
/ C
\
c* C'
AH, 60 33
-tft 91 -47 51
H0 \ -- C/ o \H AH, '57 81
-40 00
m
ci ci \
/ c<
\H
AH, * 4 tO
8 29 1 60
1 VII c< Cl \/
C/l
\ o
AH, 4 21
63
Ci \
a1 /
C
Cl4 0
AH, *5 10
V c
/
& /
CI
CI
AH, * -Q?1
-4 7 \ \.
VV-
-1018'
ci H \ "d
Cl 0 AH, - -4 90
H \
ci 1 /
o^c
CAlN,
V0 10 3
-M 87 *50 57
0*
\ c,.-
CI
--c/ \H
AH, -49 83
-f3 T)
H p.,\c
--
c/0
\
cAH, -60 91
4431
Ci V
/c. 1
c
Cl/ Cl
AH, 168
1 4ft
Ct 1 \/
--c Cl' 0 AM, -6 `4
\ a
-- C\/CI
A"! 54 44
47 24
* Isomerization resulting from a 1,2 H` or Cl' atom shift. Observed product found in vivo or in vitro using rat liver. T Predicted pathway.
4 !- v-
52
TABLE VIII
CALCULATED HEATS OF FORMATION OF SPECIES INVOLVED IN PROPOSED FORMATION OF CARBONYL PRODUCTS FROM EPOXIDES OF CHLOROETHYLENES BY PATHWAY III
X
'U
\ X
X
o
X
(po<4# HI
AlAM,1 P'OiOA4i*4
tpOlKlf * EpoaXW
Cpo><4*
dlAMfl
\c--c /
/\ H Cl
A, - *33*7
ISM?
H
H0 M \/\ / C--C /\
C1 CI
AMt 174
-3 GO *4 0) m~m-m
(HI
HOC! \ /\ /
/\ M Cl
ah, * -m?
304 15
H H 0 Cl
\ /\ /
/\ H Cl
4 50
AlAHfl
C*'fe041>a"
AlAH,! lM**w><|1>On
hawmt1 Cmiivi
t H o--H
V/
c-c
vX
AM, * 171 05
30 10
/ */
H Cl
/
C "" C
/ H-0
VH \
AH, - 140 9*
M 0 --H /
/"Cv",M "V
AH, > <79 14
/ '-40*1
H--0 \*
h /
Ci H AH, > <3133
CirMuliVt -110*7
PvofeuCt
[*<
*? ao
\/
c--c
J N-
3*05
AH, -49*7
114 4*
H0
\/
H- C_Cv
V
'*
-37 *1
AH, -*4 33
, H 0-- M
\* / ,c-c.....o
V
Ah, * 112 96
-47 65
h-0
Ci
/ C--C
*
700 4* 1
/\
AH, - 140 <3
t t
\/ X *4
0 AH, - -6033
Cl 0 --m \* 1
c` \
*33 77
H V
H-0
O /
\
<9137
ao
\/ 37 15
AH, > 1*6 33
AH, - 145 5*
AH, - -67*1
ini IV)
H o Cl \/\/
/\ 0H
AH, -JOM
vx><*
H HOC)
\A/
/\ Cl H
AH, * 175 70
-U2
H"V
t
C> H AH, - 173 06
-31 95 25 53
H-\. r
at AH, - 140 13
H \* /
Cl / %>
? 4*
\
M I**" C -- C
V
o
19*27
AH, **033
4 ao
\/ \
*2343
m
Cl 0 H \ /\ /
c--c
/\ C' Cl
Ahi * >30 14
210
H Cl 0 H
\/\/
/\ CI Cl
AH, " ISO Si
-425 -MO
* VII
\Cl /0\ /Cl /\
Cl Cl Ah,--TIM
3)55*
H
C\l /0wCl
12 35
/\ Cl Cl
AH, life >0
t
/ /e"ev-o
a\
ah, - 17*J3
Ci O--M t
1 <->
6
AH, - 169 75
V/
1
C CI AH, * 173 75
AH, - 145 fife
-3*34 - 1
/ y
/
'1**0
H --0
H
V/
C--' C *.
/\
An, - (46.99
H
\-
/C
H-0
Cl
/
\**c.
*,
AH, * 153*4
19*9
\ */
nMit C t-
o' O
AH, - 1*40*
-3051*
ci H AH,* -*2*1
ct H0
\/
Oy a'
\
300*
ah, * -*a (9
701 47
O 0*
\ o-/-\
-1**9
am AH, * -4**3
709*1
4*
CI o \/
T*9*
AH, * -55 45
* Isomerization resulting from a 1,2 H' or Cl' ion shift. bNot fully optimized.
c Product observed in non enzymatic transformation of epoxide. * Final product observed in vivo or in vitro using perfused rat livers. * Predicted pathway.
W':':
''\V
TABLE IX
--:
'
.'
V
SPIN DENSITIES ON CARBON AND OXYGEN ATOMS ^POSTULATED BIRADICAL INTERMEDIATES IN FORMATION OF, ALDEHYDES OR ACYLCHLORIDE ULTIMATE CARCINOGENS
--
II 1
III, IV
VI
Radical .'* H-shift' ' RadicaT'1'.?. H-shiff Cl-shift ; ::
` -
Radical H-shift Radical Cl-shift
Radical H-shift C! shift
Radical Cl-shift ' Radical Cl-shiTt H-shift
,
Radical Ct -shift
Compound
HC1C*--CH, O' C1H,0--C* HO' H,C*--CHCIO* H,C`--C'CIO' CIH,C--C'HO'
-
Ct,C'--CH,0" HC1,C--C'HOH,C'-CC1,0' C1H,C-C`C10*
HC1C *--CHCIO' H,CIC--C'CIO' HCI,C--C'HO'
HCIC'-CCI.O' HC1,C--C'CIO" C1,C`--CHCIO' CI,C--C'HO' HC1,C--C'CIO'
ci.c'-ccip* Ct,C-C'C10'
qc<>
..+ 1.09 . + 0.02/--0.02 + 1.20 + 0.03 + 0.02/--0.02
.. C
+1.04 + 0.02/--0.01 +1.19 + 0.00/-0.00
+ 1.01 + 0.00/-0.00 + 0.02/-0.01
+ 1.12
->1.06 + 0.02/--0.01
+ 0.91 + 0.03
qC0
' . + 0.16 + 0.79 -0.14 + 0.82 + 0.79
'......... ' ' .. '" -
+ 0.15 + 0.78 + 0.02 + 0.77
+ 0.16 + 0.77 + 0.78
-0.17 + 0.77/-0.01 + 0.16 + 0.78 + 0.7 7/--0.01
-0.16 + 0.77/-0.01
90
' +0.96 +1.10 + 0.96 A + 1.08 + 1.10
' ' ' - 4J' + 0.96 + 1.11 + 0.96 1.09
+ 0.95 + 1.09 + 1.11
-0.95 + 1.11 + 0.95 + 1.12 . + 1.11
+ 0.97 + 1.11
-vi'-M,. ' .-:&$!
' *-.1 'i'iiS'T
II
r.^4, ' .
629frZ0 SSU
::V11
_-jt%
Q&4T'
fe
;v v,..
':i,
C:.;' o
TABLEX
"' `
CALCULATED ELECTROPHILIC PROPERTIES 0^ ULTIMATE CARCINOGENS: ACYLCHLORIDES AND ALDEHYDES *t
Parent compound
m\_ [in J [III], [IV]
[V]
* : Postulated '
ultimate carcinogens
*3G*
ClCHJ^Hb-1 ;
9,............. CHjCC!1
' +0.2435 + 0.3144
;
CiCH^CI6'1
+ 0.3021
9. Cl.CHCH11
+ 0.2527
Cl.C^H'
O CHCljdlCl
+ 0.2590 + 0.2985
<4
+ 0.0577 + 0.0162 + 0.1160 + 0.0937 + 0.1592 + 0.1518
E,*LUMOh (ev)
LCAO(C,)f
-0.1520 -0.0730 -0.6700 -0.8381 -1.033 -1.209
+ 0.559 + 0.778 + 0.511 + 0.536 + 0.439 + 0.557
LCAO(Ca;^ -
+ 0.419 + 0.069'
-V
+ 0.547; + 0.357 + 0.599 + 0.490
[VI]
Cl.CCl*
+ 0.2952
+ 0.1908
-1.496
+ 0.499
+ 0.639
* Numerals in brackets refer to parent compound as labeled in Table VI from which carbonyl compound listed was formed. b Observed product of parent compound I.
* Observed product of parent compound II. J Observed product of parent compounds III and IV.
* Observed product of parent compounds V and VI. 1 net charge on carbonyl carbon calculated by Muliken population analysis.
* qa: net charge on o carbon calculated. h^LUMO! calculated energy of lowest unoccupied molecular orbital. 1 LUMO values calculated by ab Initio method using STO-3G basis set for these compounds are + 0.110 ev, + 0.122 ev and + 0.0765
eir, respectively.
. .`A tfu
0E9frZ0 Sa
IS
H* '*> l`i r. Tlf*
- -
*& >:> >'
, JK/-T
f -
'f^s
":&w,`<fj. *< j-Jt ' , *v;--' ** j' 'v '.gl
$m\&8 Mr^nw.- .'..*
'3*'?K'-:,':*'''
Iifft^/
V. 0 8.8.3
0`0'. ^JO*.
.& ..:~ . '
;*
*2 *?5 ,;f- -*,1 ' .*'&: Iteld t*
^Spr .vr,*? ....
* * ` rVl
, '' \* [` ^ *-'.* ,***-* ' * ' ' " V * . - 3 -T < 1-* , ,
`
` *j
'' ' 1 Jf ,
1^7
Thennodynamic'data-for the three proposed pathways (Figs. 3 arid *4)
to ^formation of chloracetaldehydes, acylchlorides and epoxides are summarized ir Tables,VI-rVIII, respectively. We see from Tables'VI and .. m;
VH .that the proposed first #tep, addition of a triplet oxygen atom to
thief parent' compound,^ can yield . two different radical intermediates
corresponding to addition of an oxygen atom to each of two'inequivalent
carbon atoms. As"shown in Table .VI, Pathway I to carbonyl products is
i, V
, - ,"u'
*
TA3LEXI .
* *' ' ' , -
' Tvjiw'
,^.i,,
,
,
-.
:
T, , '
>_
,
"
CALCULATED ELECTROPHILIC PROPERTIES OP CARBOCATIONS ALTERNATIVE POSSIBLE ACTIVE FORMS OF CHLOROETHYLENES
f Ptrwu
", ''5 .r1 in ^ \/ HO
/;'' - ; mi.
\c/\cr * ./ \
, Protort#td '
Epoxk)*
Carbtxvtlon
'j? > ,
M NON )-V
f
y ./ /TST"
^ <* H AM,* 19140
oo **, * turn
- *)' -
A /"
/c"eC* " Vo
,,'AH, I9V.U i
t,' ,i
' M tV`\ ' MOO
\CA"C/- /\
tPMt .\
h'" o-V . V ./
/-'-O
AH,- if340
<5 O--H .V, /
a^ > iN AHt tU3 '
Pr<ton1*d CasbACMiOA Epoakto
eUmo1*'1
+/409
-,62
-6.67
-044
+61
-9J6
--6j09 (+^301
-6.71
>'
ft -*'ii r.
Vt c--c /\ *5. , ' IV| O0 H \ f\ /
Cstt
aa
\A?
/C*~C\ ' QM
191JO
, h-*o
a
\w
am,-mot
H ' * ' ' O0m >-<
AH, - tQ4
t H - &-" ,
c--C / . r a *0 rAM,-170J3 '
^. ' 0
O--Hk
"nAp"'
, \ aM,*wrn
, '0
,, t O--H
/C-V
aa AH, - IM.10
o' C *AH,-f ,n
+.412
+.417
+J26 **
+,229
-S2 -6.43
-9.05 -0.27 -0.03 -9^3
\> -' It
*
sir. '
.
' ...
'iT-itf'?!.'' v,|t-ri - ,
Mi.--.
~^v>tf.y y-*^' - 'i>^-J" HJ^TS'-v ''%$?$& '>" si4#sV*-'.*;,y/v-' '' .;'',,!' (.'-:u \'*v*
/'/..:'-'<, v,* Jhl
further complicated by the fact that isomerization of these initial triplet
. radicals by H or Cl atom 1,2 shifts can also lead to multiple species.
-v
' Table IX givns the calculated spin densities on all biradical intermediates'
on the formation of aldehyde or acylchloride intermediates. We see from
Table IX that in the initial biradical formed, one unpaired electron is on the
, alpha carbcn atoms one on the oxygen, with some delocalization on the
carbonyl carbon. Isomerization of this triplet biradicals by 1, 2 H or Cl atom
shifts, leads to a corresponding shift in unpaired electron density from the
alpha carbon, which is tetrahedral in the isomerized radical to the carbonyl
carbon prior to reforming the C--O double bond/
Table X gives the calculated properties of the carbonyl compounds chosen
as indicators of their relative electrophilicity, i.e.', net charge on the two
carbon atoms, the energy of the lowest unoccupied n* molecular orbital and
the extent of participation of the two carbon atoms in this orbital. As shown
in Table X, this n orbital has significant participation of both carbon atoms.
In would serve as the initial electron accepting orbital in covalent bond
formation with tissue nucleophiles. The energy of this orbital is an indication
of the ease of electron transfer to the active form of the carcinogen in
covalent bond formation with DNA bases.
The MNDO method tends to overestimate the stability of the low-lying
empty orbitals. As with all other properties, however, only the relative value
of Elumo obtained by MNDO for the series of related carbonyl compounds is1 used.
In order to verify whether the same relative behavior occurs using a more
rigorous method of calculation, E^lumo was calculated for three representa
tive aldehydes: monochloroacetylchloride, monochloroacetaldehyde and
acylchloride, using an ab initio method with an STO-3G basis set [61]. The
values obtained are given in the footnote to Table X. We see that, while the
absolute values obtained are different for each analog, the order of increasing
electron affinity is preserved.
Table XI summarizes similar calculated electrophilic properties of carboca- ~
tions resulting from ring opening of protonated epoxides.
DISCUSSION
Electrophilicity of putative ultimate. carcinogens and correlation with carcinogenic potency
, Chloroaldehydes and-acylchlorides have been postulated as a plausible
active form of chloroethylenes. However, it is also possible that epoxide intermediates can. form the observed DNA adducts, provided they are protected from the facile rearrangement to carbonyl products which both our calculations and experimental observations indicate occur.
, If acylchlorides and aldehydes are the ultimate carcinogens, the type of
adducts observed (Pig. 2) require that they act as electrophiles. Our results, however, indicate no correlation between calculated indicators of electrophihcity of the putative ultimate carcinogens and the tentative rank order of
R&S 024632
1 with
ausible poxide >ey are h both
type of results, ilectrorder of
carcinogenic activity (Table XII), This lack of correlation holds for all possible chloroaldehydes or acylchlorides of the parent compound, whether or not they or their oxidized and reduced forms have been identified as
metabolites. These results are in striking contrast to those we obtained in similar
studies of the saturated chloroethanes (Loew and Rebagliati, unpublished). Though presumed to act via the same ultimate carcinogens, the chloro-.'thanes undergo a different transformation to the reactive species than that rf the chloroethylenes. The relative electrophilicities of the chloroacetallehydes and acylchlorides are excellent indicators of their work order of :srcinogenic activity for*this class of compounds. The results obtained here ind the differences between them and those for the saturated chloroethanes iave three major implications:
(1) For the unsaturated chloroethylenes, the rather complex transforma-
'ABLE XII
.'ORRELATION OF CALCULATED PROPERTIES WITH RELATIVE CARCINO1ENICITY OF PARENT CHLOROETHYLENES ASSUMING CARBONYL PRODUCTS tS ULTIMATE CARCINOGENS
arent 'ompounds
Rank order carcino genicity parent
Postulated ultimate carcinogen
Elumo (ev)
A(aHjh) a(aHltp)
(kcal/
(kcal/
mol)
mol)
.I,C--CHC1 1
?,, ClCH,CH*,b
+ 0.058 -0.152
H,C-CC1,
1
H,cic(?ci*-b
+ 0.116 -0.670
UC1C-CC1H 2
HCl.C^--Hb
9
HjCICCCI*
+ 0.09 + 0.116
-0.838 -0.670
Cl,C-CC1, 3 HC1C-CC1, 4
ClsC^Cl'b
9
C1,CCHC O
Cl,HCCCl'd
+ 0.191 -1.496 + 0.159 -1.033 (0.152) (-1.209)
* Predicted products. b Observed products. c Product observed from parent compound in vivo. d Product observed from epoxide in vitro.
00
-4.2
-4.7
6.0 11.7 1.6 6.2
9.3 18.7
12.9
21.6
(7.45) (15.4)
R&S 024634
58
TABLE XIII
CORRELATION OF CALCULATED PROPERTIES WITH RELATIVE CARCINO GENICITY OF PARENT CHLOROETHYLENES ASSUMING EPOXIDE CARBOCATION AS ULTIMATE CARCINOGEN
Parent compounds
Rank order carcinogenicity parent
Postulated ultimate carcinogen
4c0
H.C-CHCl H,C--CC1, HC1C-CHC1
1 2 ?
H,C*--CHCIOH H,CT--CCl.OH HCIC*--CHCIOH
tO.536 + 0.561
0.412
0 2.3 2.5
C1,C**CC1, CHC--CC1,
3 4
C1,C`--CCl,OH CljC*--CHC'OH
0.329 0.326
7.2 4.7
tion to the ultimate carcinogens is an important discriminating factor in determining their relative carcinogenic activity, compared to the electrophilicity of the resultant species.
(2) For the unsaturated chloroethylenes, there could be competing de toxification pathways involving the electrophilicity of the ultimate carcino gens which impede their interactions with DNA.
(3) If carbocations formed from epoxides by protonation and ring opening are the ultimate carcinogens, their electrophilicity could be relevant. As shown in Table XI, the ELUMO`values fr these cations are relatively constant for the series of compounds (Elumo = --9.04 to --9.23 ev). They do not correlate with observed relative carcinogenic activity of the parent compounds. However, as shown in Table XIII, there is some correlation of relative carcinogenic activity with the calculated net charge on the cationic carbon of each epoxide carbocation that could be involved in Type 2. adduct formation.
Correlations of thermodynamic properties with the extent of metabolism and carcinogenicity
The remaining results obtained in this study, i.e., calculated stabilities of intermediates and products, can be used to investigate the hypothesis that the extent of transformations of parent chloroethylenes to the putative ultimate carcinogens determines their relative carcinogenic potency and to obtain insights into the mechanisms of these transformations. To this end, comparison of predicted and observed relative metabolic behavior of the six chloroethylenes should help decide which, if any, of the proposed path ways is relevant to.formation of the active carcinogen. Examination of all calculated thermodynamic quantities for their extent of correlation with
! : CARCINOi : CARBOCA-
S aUH,p)
t
;o
t
2.3 i 2.5
t 7.2 i 4-7 H--
f
f
s lg factor in
S th^kctro!TM
npeting de| ate carcino
n and ring be relevant, e relatively 3 ev). They : the parent correlation irge on the involved in
?}
metabolism
tabilities of othesis that he putative ;ncy and to ;o this end, ivior of the posed path* ation of all lation with
I 1
rank order of carcinogenicity should help determine if extent of metabolism is a discriminating factor in relative carcinogenic activity.
As discussed above, we have proposed that transformation- of chloro-
ethylenes to carbonyl products can proceed by three different pathways: triplet biradical isomerization (Pathway I), a triplet/singlet crossing (Pathway II), or via an epoxide intermediate (Pathway III) (Fig. 3). Epoxide
formation is also possible by Pathway II. Support for this mechanism comes from the result that calculated energy
differences between triplet and singlet biradicals shown in Table VII are small. The optimized geometries for the two states are also close. For example, the largest discrepancy in bond lengths between the triplet and singlet states of HC1C--CHC10 is 0.004 A for the C~O bond and in bond angles is 1. Thus, intersystem crossing could occur within the energetic and geometrical `boundaries' of a molecule's normal vibrational modes.
All relevant thermodynamic data are presented in Tables VI--VIII. The use of the calculated results to interpret experimental metabolic studies is complicated by the fact that, while there is only one epoxide intermediate possible for each parent compound, multiple radicals and isomerized radicals and carbocations are predicled from all but the perchlorinated parent compound, leading to two possible carbonyl products. The favored
route to product formation by each pathway is shown in each table. In enzymatic reactions it is difficult to determine which of the many complex steps leading to carbonyl products determines the extent of metabolism and product specificity. Hence the intermediates calculated to be most stable do not always correspond to these products identified thus far in in vivo meta bolism. Other factors which could introduce uncertainties in the usefulness of our calculated quantities as indicators of both metabolic and carcinogenic behavior are: (1) we have considered only electronic components of enzymatic reactions, neglecting steric effects which cannot be modeled without detailed knowledge of the active site of the enzymes; (2) we are using thermodynamic, rather than kinetic, criteria for extent and specificity of formation of metabolic products, i.e., calculation of heats of formation of intermediates rather than activation energies of transition states ; (3) errors in calculated heats of formations. Given these uncertainties, however, our results do give some insights into mechanism of transforma
tion. Comparing our predicted products with those observed from metabolic
s'aidies [16,24,26,27,36--42] involving either whole animals, perforated liver or liver microsomes, we have predicted the major metabolites observed for vinyl chloride and vinylidene chloride, but not for trichloroethylene. However, even for vinylidene chloride, most of the lowest energy inter mediates leading to the observed product result from the initial triplet radical with a calculated higher energy, indicating this first step is not rate
determining. Our results for cis- and irans-l,2-dichloroethylene lead to prediction of
monochloroacetyichloride as a major product. While preliminary metabolic
R&S 024635
R&S 024636
60
studies using perfused liver failed to detect this metabolite [24], more work is needed to clarify whether it, as well as dichloroacetic acid, is present.
Our results for trichloroethylene lead to the prediction of dichloroacetylchloride and its products as metabolites, whereas the other possible meta bolite, trichloroacetaldehyde (chloral), has been observed as well as trichloroacetic acid and chloral hydrate, Cl3CCH(OH)2 [41]. Our predicted metabolite has, however, been found in studies of non-enzymatic trans formation of the epoxide, a result in agreement with the energetics of Pathway HI.
Pathway III describes a possible non-enzymatic transformation of epoxides to aldehydes. Favorable energetics are obtained for each step in the proposed pathway, and, in particular, isomerized carbocations formed by both chlorine and hydrogen migration are more stable than the original carbocation, indicating Pathway III is plausible. Consistent with these results, synthetic epo*.idCi> were found to rearrange thermally to form acylchlorides and di- and monochioroacetaldehyde [24].
The products detected all correspond to chlorine migration which is calculated to be competitive with hydrogen migration for all compounds except cis- and frans-l,2-dichloroethylene. For these two compounds, our results favor hydrogen migration leading to monochloroacetic acid as a major product even by non-enzymatic transformation of the epoxide. In general, our results indicate non-enzymatic isomerization which appears to be the determining step in carbonyl product selectivity.
Of all the thermodynamic quantities calculated for these complex trans formations of chloroethylenes, only the four given in Table XIV correlate with their rank order of metabolism. Given in Table XIV are: (1) the relative enthalpies of isomerization of the initial triplet biradicals A(AH;r). leading directly to carbonyl products; (2) the differences in enthalpy between the triplet radical and singlet biradical a(AHst): (3) the stabilities of epoxide intermediates formed from the singlet biradical relative to each parent compound [A(AHcp)]; (4) the relative enthalpies of isomerization of these epoxides to carbonyl products [A(AHiep)]. Consistently, as discussed above, the energetics of these steps also appear to be most relevant in determining product specificities.
Having identified four thermodynamic quantities which correlate with the extent of metabolism of parent compounds, the question arises whether any of them also contribute to their relative carcinogenic activity. If carbonyl products are assumed to be the ultimate carcinogens, as shown in Table XII, their relative isomerization enthalpies both with and without epoxide inter mediates are good indicators c f rank order of carcinogenic potency. These correlations imply both pathways to the carbonyl products can contribute
to observed carcinogenic activity of the parent compounds. Interestingly, if we assume dichloroacetylchloride, our predicted meta
bolite and that found in vitro, to be the ultimate carcinogen of trichloro ethylene, we predict it to be more carcinogenic than tetrachloroethylene; whereas with the observed product, it is predicted to be less carcinogenic.
$
62
These results suggest that the lower activity found for trichloroethylene is due to competing formation of other products, perhaps by hydrolysis of the epoxide. Determination of the etfect of epoxide hydrase on metabolic distribution and carcinogenic activity could help resolve this point.
Experiments with epoxide hydrase could also help resolve the question of whether epoxides themselves or their carbocations also act as ultimate carcinogens. As indicated in Table XIII, two calculated properties, the net charge on the epoxide carbocation and the stability of the epoxide relative to the parent compound, also show some correlation with carcino genic activity and could implicate these species as ultimate carcinogens.
For the chloroethylenes, then, three possible modes of transformations to active carcinogens could be important: formation of carbonyl products directly or via epoxide intermediates and formation of carbocations from the epoxides. If carbonyl products are the ultimate carcinogens, then our results imply that their extent of formation by isomerization from primary products of P-450 oxidation rather than their electrophilicities are discrimi nating factors in determining the relative carcinogenic potency of the parent compounds.
On the other hand, if epoxides themselves can act as ultimate carcinogens without isomerization to carbonyl compounds, then the electrophilicity of their carbocation is a good indicator of relative parent compound activity.
Using the criteria corresponding to all three modes of activation, we predict that 1,2-dichloroethylene which has not yet been studied will be a carcinogen with an activity intermediate between vinylidene chloride and tetrachloroethylene. This prediction remains to be verified.
In screening of other unknown compounds with haloethylene functional groups, the four promising indicators of carcinogenic activity identified here, i.e., isomerization energies with and without epoxide intermediates, stability of epoxides relative to parent compound, and the net charge on the epoxide carbocation should be calculated to further sort out tneir relative importance and predictive capabilities.
In addition to providing a possible screening procedure for carcinogenic activity relative to vinyl chloride, the results of our studies provide some insight into the mechanism of formation of the ultimate carcinogens. These may be summarized as follows:
(1) The first step in oxidative .netabolism of chloroethylenes does not determine the extent of metabolism, consistent with other mechanistic studies [22,23).
(2) Non-enzymatic formation of carbonyl products from the initial products of oxidative metabolism of parent compounds is very probable. Such products can be formed by a radical mechanism at the substrate binding site or from epoxides in a polar environment. Our results are consistent with both of these mechanisms.
(3) Formation of an epoxide (Pathway II) could be a critical step in extent of metabolism and formation of the ultimate carcinogen. Experi-
ichloroethylene i by hydrolysis le hydrase on
:lp resolve this
/e the question act as ultimate properties, the of the epoxide n with carcinote carcinogens, transformations bonyl products bocations from igens, then our i from primary ies are discrimi:y of the parent
St
late carcinogens ctroohilicity of
activity. a^^Ltion, we tudied will be a te chloride and
/lene functional
tivity identified 2 intermediates, et charge on the >ut their relative
for carcinogenic s provide some cinogcns. These
ylenes does not her mechanistic
rom the initial very probable.
it the substrate Our results are
critical step in
31 inogen. Experi-
ifSc
63
mental data implicating the epoxide as a metabolite mostly using epoxide hydrase as a potential inhibitor of carbonyl products and adduct formation ire indirect and incomplete, but this possibility has not been ruled out. 3ur results offer some corroboration for the involvement of epoxides in ictivating transformations of the parent chloroethylenes.
INCLUSION
Properties of six chloroethylenes intermediates and putative ultimate arcinogens which could serve as indicators of their relative metabolic jehavior and carcinogenic activity have been calculated using MNDO, a emiempirical, all valence electron, molecular orbital method. Possible athways of transformation of parent compounds to acylchlorides, hloroaldehydes and epoxides, their putative ultimate carcinogens, were onsidered, and heats of formation and relative stabilities of intermediates ore calculated. Our results indicate that carbonyl compounds could be ormed with and without the intermediacy of epoxides, suggesting the possibility of more than one pathway in activation of parent compounds.
The results obtained suggest that if carbonyl products are the active arcinogens, the relative extent of metabolism to these ultimate carcinogens, ather than their electrophilicity is a determinant of the relative carcinogenic ctivity of the parent compound. Of the various thermodynamic criteria nvestigated, three involving further transformations of initial products of ixidative metabolism to epoxide and carbonyl products were found to be indicators of both relative metabolic behavior and carcinogenic activity.
The quantities identified in this study as reasonable indicators of the rank nrder of carcinogenicity of the four known chloroethylenes could be useful is predictors of at least the qualitative carcinogenic activity of unknown compounds with haloethylene functional groups.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Support for this work from the National Toxicology program under NCI Contract No. 1 CP15730 and helpful discussions with Dr. Kenneth Chu of the NCI and Dr. John Mennear of NTP arc gratefully acknowledged.
REFERENCES
1 P.L. Viola, A. Bigotti and A. Caputo, Oncogenic response of rat skin, lungs and bones to vinyl chloride, Cancer Res., 31 (1978) 516.
2 C. Maltoni, Vinyl chloride carcinogenicity: an experimental model for carcinogenesis studies, in: Proceedings of the Origins of Human Cancer, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1976, p, 119,
3 C. Maltoni and G, Lefemine, Carcinogenicity bioassays of vinyl chloride. I. Research plans and early results, Environ. Res., 7 (1974) 387,
4 I,R, Tabershaw and W.R. Gaffcy, Mortality studies of workers in the manufacture of vinyl chloride and its polymers, J. Occup. Med., 16 (1974) 509.
R&S 024639
64
5 W,T, Nicholson, E.C. Hammond, H. Sudmar and I.N. Selikoff, Mortality experience of a cohort of vinyl chloride-polyvinyl chloride workers, Ann, N.Y. Acad. Sci., 246 (1975) 225.
6 J. McCann, E. Choi, E. Yamaski and B. Ames, Detection of carcinogens as mutagens in the Salmcnella/microsomc test: assay of 300 chemicals, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 72 (1975) 5135.
7 B.L. Van Duuren, On possible mechanism of carcinogenic action of vinyl chloride, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 246 (1976) 258.
8 M.J. McKenna, P.G. Walanabe and P.J, Gehring, Pharmacokinetics of vinylidene chloride in the rat. Environ. Health Perspec., 21 (1977) 157.
9 G.H. Locw, B. Sudhindra and J.E. Ferrell, Jr., Quantum chemical studies of poly cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their metabolites: correlations to carcinogenicity, Chcm.-Biol. Interact., 26 (1979) 75.
10 H.R, Potter, Vinyl chloride, Food. Cosmet. Toxicol., 14 (1976) 347--354, 498. 11 A.G. Salmon, Cytochrome P450 and the metabolism of vinyl chloride, Cancer Lett.,
2 (1976) 109. 12 E.S. Reynolds, M.T. Mosler. S. Szabo and B.J. Jaeger, Vinyl chloride induced deactiva
tion of cytochrome P450 and other components of the liver mixed function oxidase system: an in vivo study, Cbem. Pathol. Pharmacol. Res. Commun., 12(4) (1975) 685. 13 H, Bartsch, C. Malavcillc, R. Montesano and L. Tomatis, Tissue-mediated muta genicity of vinylidene chloride on 2-chlorobutiadine in Salmonella typhimurium, Nature, 255 (1975) 641. 14 K.C. Liebman and K.H. Byington, Metabolism of trichloroethylene in liver microsomes. I. Characteristics of the reaction, Mol. Pharmacol., 1 (1965) 2-t7. 15 H. Allemend, E. Pessayre, V. Descatoire, C. Degott, G. Feldman and J. Benhamou, Metabolic activation of trichloroethylene into a chemically reactive metabolite toxic to the liver, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Tlicr., 204 (1978) 714. 16 K. Leibman and E. Ortiz, Metabolism of halogcnated ethylenes. Environ, Health Perspec., 21 (1977) 91. 17 J.T. Groves, G.A. McClusky, R.E. White and M.J. Coon, Aliphatic hydroxylation by microsomal cytochrome P450. Evidence for a carbon radical intermediate, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 81 (1978) 154. 18 J.T. Groves, T.E. Nemo and R.S. Myers, Hydroxylation and epoxidation catalyzed by iron porphine complexes. Oxygen transfer from iodosylbenzene, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 101(1979)1032. 19 R.P. Hanzlik and G.O, Shearer, Secondary deuterium isotope effects on olefin epoxi dation by cytochrome P450, Biochem. Pharmacol., 27 (1978) 1441, 20 F.P. Ouengerich and T.W. Strickland, Metabolism of vinyl chloride: destruction of the heme of highly purified liver microsomal cytochrome P450 by a metabolite, Mol. Pharmacol., 13 (1977) 993. 21 A.K. Costa, l.D. Katz and K.M. Ivanetich, Trichloroethylene, its interaction with
hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 in vitro, Biochem. Pharmacol., 29 (1980) 433. 22 A.T. Pudzianowski and G.H. Loew, Quantum chemical studies of model cytochrome
P450 hydrocarbon oxidation mechanisms. I. A MINDO/3 study of hydroxylation and epoxidation for methane and ethylene, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 102 (1980) 5443. 23 A.T. Pudzianowski and G.H. Loew, Quantum chemical studies of model cytochrome P450 hydrocarbon mechanisms. II. Mechanisms and relative kinetics of oxene reactions with alkenes, J. Mol. Catal. (1982) in press. 24 G. Bonsc, T, Urban, D. Reichert and D. Henschler, Chemical reactivity, metabolic oxiranc formation and biological reactivity of chlorinated ethylenes in the isolated perfused rat liver, Biochem. Pharmacol., 24 (1975) 1829. 25 S. Yllner, Urinary metabolites of ["C Jtetraohloroethylene in mice, Nature, 191 (1961)820. 26 P.G. Watanabc. G.R. McGowan and P.J. Gehring, Fate of ["CJvinyl chloride after single oral administration in rats, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 36 (1976) 339.
>-
R&S 024640
tality experience . Acad. Sci., 246
gent a* mutagens Natl. Acad. Sci.
>f vinyl chloride,
ct of vinylidene
studies of poly carcinogenicity,
347--354, 498. Je, Cancer Lett.,
nduced deactivaunction oxidase
12(4) (1975)
mediated mutai typhimurium,
in liver micro-
'A d J.^^Hiamou,
neiaoWte toxic
environ. Health
,-droxylation by diate, Biochem.
on catalyzed by m. Chem. Soc.,
on olefin epoxi-
destruction of letabolite, Mol.
iteraction with 29 (1980)433. lei cytochrome roxylation and 5443, el cytochrome tics of oxene
ity, metabolic n the isolated
Nature, 191
chloride after 139.
a I
65
B.K. Jones and D.E. Hathaway, The biological fate of vinylidene chloride in rata, Chem.-Biol. Interact., 20 (1978) 27. D. Pcs3ayre, J.C. Wandscheer, V. Descatoire, J.Y. Artigou and J.P, Benhamou, Forma ion and inactivation of a chemically reactive metabolite of vinyl chloride, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 49 (1979) 505. 11.E. Hefner, P.G. Watanabe and PJ. Gehring, Preliminary studies of the fate of .nhaled vinyl chloride monomer in rata, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 246 (1975) 135. T. Green and D.E. Hathaway, Interactions of vinyl chloride with rat liver DNA in ;ivo,Chem.-Biol. Interact., 22 (1978) 211. i,-.P. Guengerich and P.G. Watanabe, Metabolism of ("C] and ('`Cl) labeled vinyl hloride in vivo and in vitro, Biochem. Pharmacol., 28 (1979) 589, I.R. Barrio, J.A. Secrist III and J.N. Leonard, Fluorescent adenosine and cytidine lerivatives, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 46 (1972) 597, t.J. Laib and H.M. Bolt, Alkylation of RNA by vinyl chloride metabolites in vitro ind in vivo: formation of l-N`-ethcnoadenosine, Toxicology, 8 (1977) 185. il.J. Laib, L.M. Gwinner and H.M, Bolt, DNA alkylation by vinyl chloride meta bolites: etheno derivatives or 7-alkylation of guanine, Chem.-Biol. Interact,, 37 11981) 219. A. Schumann, J,F. Quasi and P.G. Watanabe, The pharmacokinetics and molecular interactions of perchloroothylcnc in mice and rats as related to oncogenicity, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 55 (1980) 207. J.G. Filser and H.M. Bolt, Pharmacokinetics of halogenated ethylenes in rats, Arch. Toxicol., 42 (1979) 123. P.G. Watanabe, G.R. McGowan, E.O. Madrid and P.J. Gehring, Fate of [,4C]viny! chloride following inhalation exposure in rats, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 37 (1976) 19. J.W. Daniel, The metabolism of "Cl-labcled trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylenes in the rat, Biochem. Pharmacol., 72 (1963) 795. ' B. Soucek and D. Vlachova, Excretion of trichloroethylene metabolites in human urine, Br. J. Ind. Med., 17 (1960) 60, ) D.G. Pegg, J.A. Zempel, W.H. Braun and P.H, Watanabe, Disposition of tetrachloro["CJethylene following oral and inhalation exposure in rats, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 51 (1979) 465. 1 D.E. Hathaway, Consideration of the evidence for mechanisms of 1,1,2-trichloroethylene metabolism, including new identification of its dichloroacetic acid and trichloroacetic acid metabolites in mice, Cancer Lett,, 8 (1980) 263. 42 T. Green and D.E. Hathaway, The biological fate in rats of vinyl chloride in relation to its oncology, Chem.-Biol, Interact,, 11 (1975) 545. 13 C. Maltoni, Recent findings in the carcinogenicity of chlorinated olefins, Environ. Health Perspec., 21 (1977) 1. 11 C. Maltoni, W.H.O. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Internal Technical Report No. 74/005, Report on Working group on Vinyl Chloride, Lyon, June 24--25. 1974. 15 C. Maltoni and G. Lefeminc. Carcinogenicity bioassays of vinyl chloride: current results, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 246 (1975) 195. 16 Carcinogenesis Bioassay of Trichloroethylene, DHEW Publication No. (NIH) 76-802, U.S. Dept. HEW, Public Health Services, National Institutes of Health, February, 1976. 17 Bioassay of Tetrachloroethylene for Possible Carcinogenicity, DHEW Publications No. (NIH) 77-313, U.S. Department HEW, Public Health Services, National Institues of Health, NCI, October, 1977. 18 B.L. Van Duren, B. Goldschmidt, G. Lowengart, A. Smith, S. Melchionno, I. Seldman and D. Roth, Carcinogenicity of halogenated olefins and aliphatic hydrocarbons in mice, J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 63(6) (1979) 1433. 19 J.N. Murrell, M, Radic and D.R. Williams, The theory of intermolecular forces in the region of small orbital overlap, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London). A284 (1965) 566.
R&S 024641
66
R&S 024642
50 G. Klopman and R.F. Hudson, Perturbation treatment of chemical reactivity, Theor.
Chim. Acta, 8 (1967) 165. 61 S. Inagaki, T. Minato, S. Yam.be, H. Fujinoto and K. Fukui, Mechanisms of thermal
2 + 2 cyeloaddition reactions between electro.i-dcnori and electron-acceptors, Tetrahedron, 30 (1971) 2165, 52 M.J.S, Dewar and W. Thiel, Ground state of molecules, 38. The MNDO method, approximations and parameters, J, Am, Them. Soc., 99 (1977) 1899. 53 M.J.S. Dewar and W. Thiel, Ground states of r.ioleculei XXXIX. MNDO results for molecules containing hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen and oxygen, J. Am Chem. Soc., 99 (1977) 4907. 54 M.J.S. Dewar, M.L, McKee and H.S, Rzepa, MNDO parameters for third period elements, J. Am, Chem. Soc,, 100 (1975) 3507 55 J.A. Pople and D,L, Beveridge, Approximate Mon.'nlar Orbital Theory, McGraw Hill, New York, 1970. 56 D.C, McKean, CH Stretching frequencies, bond lengths and strengths in halogenated ethylenes, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A (1975) 11G7. 57 L,E, Sutton, Tables of Interatomic Distances and Configuration in Molecules anJ Ions, Chem. Soc., Spec. Publ. 11 (1958) London. 58 P. Huisman and F. Mijlhoff, Molecular structure of vinylchloride in the gas phase as determined from electron diffraction and microwave data, J. Mol. Struct., 54 (197S) 145. 59 C. Hirose, The microwave spectra and rc, r, and r,n structure of ethylene oxide, Microwave Bull. Chem, Soc. Japan, 47 (1974) 1211. 60 P. Politzer, P. Trefonas III, I, Politzer and B. Elfmar, Molecular properties of the chlorinated ethylenes and their epouide metabolites, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 367
(1981) 478, 61 J.S. Binkley, R.A. Whiteside, R. Krishner, R, Seeger, D.J, DcFrecs, H,B. Schlegel,
S. Topiol, L,R, Kahn and J.N. Pople, Gaussian 80 -- an ab initio molecular orbital
program, Carnegic-Mellon University, Pitsburg, Pennsylvania. 62 Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 54th ed, Chemical Rubber Publishing Co.,
Cleveland, Ohio, 1973. 63 A.L, McClellan, Tables of Experimental Dipole Moments, W.H. Freeman & Co.,
San Francisco, 1963.
II
it
j t+sui awteyiraae