Document B54QDoNOEj9Ep7e4RM5LyxB4L

CrMOS-WOLOOTT Bo/aoanrnD`CrnLTtiui.L*& TBZAS BoaMB OP UOM. VKMUEAnOM Hays, McConn, Rice & Pickering A PPOTOMOVAC COITOBATISN attobnsys at Law aoo tvwo ALLSir CEKTBB LQOO SKITS STanST HOTTSTOrT, TEXAS 77002 TTSL.*JPHO>nC (7(3) TKTJSOOPXXXt (713) SoO-OOBr August 6, 1999 DuacrUMB: (713) 7524309 E-Mail; C8W@HaybMcConn.Com Mr. Oscar Soliz District Clerk Nueces County Courthouse 901 Leopard Street Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Re: Cause No. 96-03172-A; Ramon T. Cedilla, et aL vs. Owens-Coming Fibergias Corporation, ei aL\ In the 28th Judicial District Court ofNueces County, Texas Dear Mr. Soliz: Enclosed for filing please find an original and one copy ofthe following; s 1. Defendant Union Pacific Resources Company fifc/a Champlin Petroleum Company, Individually and as Successor by Merger to Pontiac Refining Corporation Response to Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Discovery Please return a file-stamped copy ofsame to the undersigned in die self-addressed stamped envelope enclosed for your convenience. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely yours, HAYS, McCONN, RICE & PICKERING CSW:dp Enclosures Craig S. Wolcott CSWX4094S1.1 RECEIVED TIMEAUG. 7. 8:22AM MJCONN. R. JE. s :ker.ng : SAT ,c: :/ 'NO. Mr. Oscar Soliz August 6, 1999 Page 2 cc: Ms. Melissa Hutto (w/encl,) Baron & Budd 3102 Oak Lawn Avenue Suite 1100 Dallas, Texas 75219 All other counsel ofrecord (w/end) VIA FACSIMILE (214) 520-1181 VIA REGULAR MAP* CSWV409461.1 RECEIVED TIMEAUG. 7. 8:22AM NO. 96-03172-A RAMON T. CEDILLO; ALV1NO RESENDO LOPEZ; AMBROSIO NINO RAMIREZ; and RICHARD FUENTES VELA VS. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS , CORPORATION, ETAL. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS $ 2SIH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANT UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES COMPANY <7k/ CffAMPLIN PETROLEUM COMPANY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO PONTIAC REFINING CORPORATION RESPONSE TP fLAEmETS* MOTION TO COMPEL PISCOVERY TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: COMES NOW, Defendant UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES COMPANY, and files this its Response to Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Discovery, and in support thereofwould show as follows: L Defendant Union Pacific Resources Company has served on PlaintifR its Second Supplemental Responses and Objections to the Plaintiffs First Set ofInterrogatories and Request for Production. A copy ofthe Second Supplemental Responses and Objections to the Plaintiffa First Sat oflhtenogstories and Request tor Production are attached hereto end labeled Exhibit "A," <md incorporated hereinby reference for all purposes. Included therein is identification ofpersons with knowledge of relevant facts, and identification of kxKrni^.noiH^ectionable documents with information responsive to Interrogatories and/or responsive to Request for Production. The documents Mwrfifcd are quite voluminous, but are available for inspection at a mutuafly-convenient date and time. CiVW9M9.1 RECEIVED TIMEAUG. 7. 8:22AM WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, UNIONPACIFIC RESOURCES COMPANY prays that Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel be in all thing* denied, and for such other and further relief to which it may be justly entitled. Respectfully submitted, HAYS, McCONN, RICE & PICKERING Byr:. f^7 B. STEPHEN RICE State Bar No. 16*38000 400 Two Allen Center 1200 Smith Street Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: (713) 654-1111 (713) 655-9212 (Facsimile) ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES COMPANY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a txue and correct copy of tile above and foregoing instrument was forwarded via certified nuil/retum receipt requested and/or via hand-delivery and/or via facamile to all counsel ofrecord on tins day ofAugust, 1999. 4- B. RICE CSWV409449.1 RECEIVED TIMEAUG. I 8:22AM