Document B0KnZeDpEpMgVjJq63oroJXX

n la UUU a.r *,.l fc. Ml H.y * c2 h.Jg f -`"'.vui'"' ** ""> ' k-iJWB. uw orrices RT2GERA10. BROWN, LEAHY, MeGlU & STROM 1000 WOODMEN TOWER OMAHA. NEORASKA J0? 342-5550 Kovember 3, 1972 { r5 > ( At the Greenbrier, you indicated that you could get a letter from each of the manufacturers of asbestos containing insulating material* stating that they are discontinuing the us# of asbestos. Z would appreciate your obtaining these letters as quickly & possible. X would suggest that the letters be addressed to Spence Royer as Chairman of our Committee. 1 would also suggest that the letters Indicate the expected date when each of the manufacturing facili ties will be converted over to nonasbeatos product* and the expected date when the manufacturers1 supplies on hand will have been disposed of. If some of the facilities have been converted over to nonasbestos material at thla time, it would be helpful to indicate the date at which this change was mads. My schedule requires that 1 be in St. Louis on November 17th, and I will be finished with my work by noon of that day. If this date is convenient for you and Spence, we would meet that afternoon. I am enclosing herewith an excerpt from the October 19, 1972, Bureau of Rational Affairs Occupational Safety and Health Reporter. You will note that Or. Stokinger of the Rational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health pretty well acknowledges that dust monitoring is of questionable value. Z would plan to use this as i m jo 01 117 1151 VWW11156 Ju05 Ccieo*t at Is <!.? U*Q*T *1 Of *KI Hit, "4 Ccfon . t, HO, in Jaelica v. S--JL-.I 1J21o Hr, Stapleton - Pag* Two - fcjvettber 3, 1972 part of our upporting >atrtal for obtaining a <Jly in the monitoring program. Vary truly youra, JAMES W. R. BROWN for the firm 01 117 ||R3