Document 9bDoo5pQN52pz0ZZy1Gv0O5e

.January 13, 1970 Richard A. Carlson, M.D., F.A.C.P. 345 Goundry Street North Tonawanda, New Yoric Dear Doctor Carlson! r am grateful to you for sending me the information concerning your patient, Miss Jean Hanel. I had suspected, from the letters which I had received from Miss Hanoi, much of what has been revealed by the records which you have sent me, but I am now on much firmer ground. My letter to Miss Hanel was in no sense deceitful, in indicating that I did not consider it necessary or presently feasible for me to interview her or to carry out further examinations. Nevertheless, 1 hesitate to sidestep appeals for assistance, even when I believe them to be misplaced. You have relieved me from any twinges of conscience in this instance. It is evident now (I had no way of knowing the true situation, for ay experience has not been altogether reasuring as to the adequacy of clinical, and, in particular, the analytical investigations of this type) that Miss Hanel has had good advice based upon a good background of information, and that I could not have contributed anything (except kindly . consideration) of significance to the elucidation of her problem. I write this to you as a matter of courtesy between us, and I do, indeed, appreciate yottr courtesy to in. In view of the fact that it is my duty to do so, as a physician, I am writing to Miss Hanel. I am indeed sorry for her and, if I could do so, I would relieve somewhat her deep anxiety concerning the causation of her illness I have no faith that I can do even this, but I shall do-my best. I shall ?1so express my belief that she is in good hands. I shall do this, I can as$ur you, in no patronizing sense. I am aware of your difficulty in dealing with such a patient, and when I wish her well, I am truly sympathetic with you. With respect to the facts, with respect to Miss Hanel's experience with lead, and as to th evidence of her absorption of unusual quantities of lead at any time, let me make two comments. The quantities of lead reported as having been found in her urine have never been above the commonly occurring quantities found in the urine of ordinary citizens who have not been subjected to more than the current environmental conditions of exposure to lead. The expression of the output of lead in the urine per day must always be looked at from the aspect of the volume of urine voided. The greater the daily volume of urine, the larger is th quantity of lead excreted per day; the daily output of an individual can be doubled by the simple measure of quadrupling the intake of water. Looking at the matteb on a different basis, we have shown that a simple concentration dilution test may alter the urinary concentration of lead from the level of 0.07 mg. per liter to 0.21 mg, per liter within the same twenty-four hour period. That is, when th throughput of water is large, the output per unit of time is enlarged, but the concentration is low, and vice versa. However, I shall not Richard A. Carlson, M .D ., F.A.C.P. Page 2 ,' January 13, 1370 labor the point, beyond pointing out that there is a large body of information on this matter, so that the physician must be careful not to fee dogmatic, as your colleague, Hr, KlendshoJ, was in interpreting the analytical results. in short, there is no foundation in the records in my hands for the slightest suspicion that lead is involved in inducing Miss Hanel's clinical condition. As to the role of chromium, I do not have at hand, such experimental information, of my own or of others, as would enable me to judge the situation on physiological grounds with anything like the assurance shown above in the case of lead. There is nothing, however, in my occupational clinical experience which gives me any anxiety ia Miss Hanel's case, in saying that there is no satisfactory basis for suspecting that chromium has played any part ia her illness. May I thank you again for your courtesy, and wish for you more success than seems probable, in dealing with this unfortunate woman. I return, herewith, the records which you have sent to me. Cordially yours, RAK:wp enc. Robert A. Xahoe, M.B. Professor Emeritus of Occupational Medicine HE 0020270