Document 9JDwd3RqoQQLKBOYypxE2k5Xp
To: Howard Feldman <Feldman@api.org>; Benzene OC listserve (E-mail) <BenzConsort-
OC@listserve.api.org>
From:
Clegg, Patsy M SCC-CHSE-PC
</O=SHE LUOU=MSXSCC/CN=RE CI PI ENTS/CN=PH197432>
Cc:
Bcc:
Received Date:
2003-10-09 17:39:01 GMT
Subject:
RE: Oversight Committee response
I guess that I am okay with it. I had actually wondered why we had included it to begin with, but did not voice my question. The only downside that I can see is explaining the discrepancy between the sponsors funding commitment and the new budget. Guess that we are asking them to do the math. We might consider revising the sentence to say
The BHRC has identified a number of changes that reduce the project budget from the original $22,800,000 to meet the funding commitment.
Regards, Patsy
Patsy Clegg Product Steward Shell Chemical LP One Shell Plaza, 91 0 Louisiana, Houston, TX 77002-4916
Tel: +1 713241 2521 Fax: 3325 Email: patsy.clegg@shell.com Internet: http://www.shell.com/chemicals
-----Original Message----From: Howard Feldman [mailto:Feldman@api.org] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 11 :57 AM To: Benzene OC listserve (E-mail) Subject: Oversight Committee response
Oversight Committee & counselors: Sorry to bother you one more time on this. Attached is the revised budget change response with one significant change - dropping the funding table and the reference thereof. This will keep the emphasis on the Consortium's plans to proceed; funding issues will be subsequently addressed with each company via modification of its agreement with API.
Please let me know by cob if this causes you any serious concern.
Howard
SH ELL-MCCLU RG-055035
To: From: Cc: Bcc: Received Date: Subject:
Howard Feldman <Feldman@api.org> brian.e.doll@exxonmobil.com <brian.e.doll@exxonmobil.com> Benzene OC listserve (E-mail) <BenzConsort-OC@listserve.api.org>
2003-10-09 20:52:56 GMT RE: Oversight Committee response
I agree with Howard's proposed changes with Patsy's revision.
Regards, Brian
(E-mail)"
"Clegg, Patsy M SCC-CHSE-PC"
To: "Howard Feldman" <Feldman@api.org>, "Benzene OC listserve
<patsy. clegg @shell
<BenzConsort-OC@listserve.api.org>
.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Oversight Committee response
10/09/0301 :38 PM
I guess that I am okay with it. I had actually wondered why we had included it to begin with, but did not voice my question. The only downside that I can see is explaining the discrepancy between the sponsors funding commitment and the new budget. Guess that we are asking them to do the math. We might consider revising the sentence to say
The BHRC has identified a number of changes that reduce the project budget from the original $22,800,000 to meet the funding commitment.
Regards, Patsy
Patsy Clegg Product Steward Shell Chemical LP One Shell Plaza, 91 0 Louisiana, Houston, TX 77002-4916
Tel: +1 713241 2521 Fax: 3325 Email: patsy.clegg@shell.com Internet: http://www.shell.com/chemicals
-----Original Message----From: Howard Feldman [mailto:Feldman@api.org] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 11 :57 AM To: Benzene OC listserve (E-mail) Subject: Oversight Committee response
SH ELL-MCCLU RG-055036
Oversight Committee & counselors: Sorry to bother you one more time on this. Attached is the revised budget change response with one significant change - dropping the funding table and the reference thereof. This will keep the emphasis on the Consortium's plans to proceed; funding issues will be subsequently addressed with each company via modification of its agreement with API. Please let me know by cob if this causes you any serious concern. Howard
SH ELL-MCCLU RG-055037