Document 93rrRaOJrBpmXrgymar8M3jJ6

Metal Weather Strips Chamberlin Metal Weather Strip Company Incorporated General OfficesDetroit, Mich. FACTORIES Detroit, Mich. Peru, Illinois Atlanta, Ga. Baltimore, Md. Boston, Mass. Buffalo, N. Y. Chicago, III. Charlotte, N. C. Cincinnati, Ohio DISTRICT BRANCHES Cleveland, Ohio Denver, Colo. Detroit. Mich. Flint, Mich. Indianapolis. Ind. Jacksonville, Fla. Kansas City, Mo. Los Angeles. Calif. Louisville. Ky. Minneapolis, Minn. Nashville. Tenn. New York, N. Y. Philadelphia, Pa. Pittsburgh. Pa. St. Louis. Mo. South Bend, Ind. Terre Haute, Ind. Washington, D. C. Wilkes-Barre, Pa. Eighty Other Branches Throughout the United States In order to measure weather strip are given in the following tables. efficiency it is much more important Tests were made by putting an air for the Heating Engi collecting chamber on neer, the Architect, the inside of the win- the Contractor and the Consumer to CHAMBERLIN dow opening and taking anemometer know what the result SINCE 1893-THE SttHPAW^S readings over a period of a weatherstrip in of thirty minutes. stallation will be. at the end of THIRTY or more years than to know the result obtainable immedi ately .after installation. What Chamberlin Weather Strip will do can be determined by a review of what Chamberlin has done for thirty-three years. Instal lations made in 1893 are still giving service and. satisfaction and the Constantly Improved Chamberlin has been the Standard weather strip since 1893. Thirtythree years have proven the basic principles of Chamberlin, but im provements in design and installa tion methods have been added whenever the Company's constant research developed a better way. same fundamental principles are Life of Building Service Policy incorporated in Chamberlin in There are only two parties to a stallations made at the present Chamberlin installation contract, time. the customer and the Chamberlin The Test of Time Company. Chamberlin manufac tures, sells, installs and services From time to time field tests are made of Chamberlin installations. The results obtained by engineers on some representative installations every installation by means of a complete organization of trained men. Results, not material alone,' are insured by the Company's Chamberlin Metal Weather Strip Co., Inc. Metal Weather Strips service guarantee which remains in effect for the "life of the building." That is why the purchase or recom mendation of Chamberlin becomes a specification of guaranteed service and not of material. Chamberlin Metal Weather Strip is the only building product sold and guar anteed in this way. No Heating Plant Can Do It All The best heating plant in the world can't heat the whole outdoors and that is just what is expected of every heating plant when installed in a building where windows and doors are not weatherstripped. Heating engineers should recognize the value of preventing heat loss rather than attempt to design a heating plant to take care of any loss no matter how great. There fore, Chamberlin cooperation and the completeness of Chamberlin service merits prime consideration in the computations of the careful engineer, architect and builder. CHAMBERLIN TESTS OF TIME Name of Building E. A. De Wolfe Res. Equity Bldg. Majestic Bldg. Majestic Bldg. Union Trust Co. Bldg. Adolphus Busch Kes. Horace Mann School City Hall Michael Reese Heap. Congress Hotel Detroit Club Fleming Bldg. D'YouviUe College Owen bldg. Ford Bldg. Boston College Campau Bldz. Hasp. Rockefeller Inst. Cleveland Ath. Club Copley Plaza Hotel Hubbell Bldg. Pharmacy Bldg. Dime Sav. Bk. Bldg. Board of Commerce Kresge Bldg. Kresge Bldg. David Whitney Bldg. Det Athletic Club Peter Smith Bldg. Fort Shelby Hotel t* teid Museum Planters Bldg. Park Ave. Bldg. Int 1. Shoe Co. Bldg. Location and Date of Chamberlin Installation Date of Test" St. Louis. 1893 Detroit, 1894 Detroit, 1896 Detroit, 1896 Cincinnati, 1901 St. Louis, 1903 New York, 1903 Detroit, 1904 Chicago. 1906 Chicago, 1906 Detroit, 1906 Des Moines, 1906 Buffalo. 1907 Detroit, 1907 Detroit. 1908 Newton, Mass. ;.I9I0: Detroit,1 - 1910 New York. 1910 Cleveland 1911 Boston, 1912 Des Moines. 1912 U. of Mmn. 1912 Detroit, 1913 Detroit, 1913 Detroit. 1914 Detroit. 1914 Detroit, I9J5 Detroit, 1915 Detroit, 1916 Detroit, 1918 Chicago. 1919 St. Louis, 1919 Detroit, 1922 St. Louis, 1923 3/ 7/25 12/17/24 12/11/24 12/12/24 3/20/25 3/ 7/25 4/11/25 12/ 3/24 2/15/25 2/11/25 12/ 2/24 2/17/25 4/ 3/25 12/ 6/24 11/27/24 4/10/25 12/ 3/24 4/ 9/25 4/ 2/25 4/10/25 2/16/25 2/23/25 11/28/24 12/10/24 12/ 9/24 12/ 9/24 11/25/24 12/13/24 12/11/24 12/ 5/24 2/26/25 3/ 7/25 12/10/24 3/ 6/25 Size of Window (Lin. FL of Crack) 18.80 23.85 34.00 34.00 26.00 18.25 20.67 30.67 32.00 25,33 26.50 25.33 27.00 28.00 26.50 20:67 23:50 19.50 31.50 20.33 26.00. 25.33 26.50 21.00 27.85 27.85 28.50 20.67 19.85 23.33 24.17 26.70 26.85 29.00 Wind Velocity. M. P. H. U. S. Weather Bureau leakage Without W. S. Based on A.S.H.&V.E. Test Leakage on Date of Test Including Frame and Pulley Leak Per centage of Possible Leakage Kept Out 25 24 8 12 15 21 7.5 9 12 15 8 6 18 18 12 78.88 96.04 46.25 68.38 72.30 66.79 28.23 44.36 66.10 63.70 35.28 23.30 83.15 87.00 53.30 .53 5.05 1.79 4 22 7.00 2 51 1.87 7.31 10.65 4.00 4.19 2.50 4.98 4.42 5.01 99.3 93.70 95 91 93.86 90.32 96 20 93.38 83.52 83.90 93.70 88.41 89.30 94.00 94.92 90.60 12.5 10 M. 20 12 7.5 8 22 12 28 24 19 14.5. 16 13 16.5 18 21 15 . 47.60 47.23 46.29 109.70 44.40 29.25 38.10 90.15 42.13 132.76 112.15 92.65 49.82 53.17 50.73 66.20 83.75 96.46 74.26 3.34 5.00 3.66 6.30 1.16 4.26 3.00 9.93 1.98 17.53 15.47 5.00 5.35 3.76 6.96 5.65 6.41 3.23 2.55. 92.40 89.44 92.10 94 16 97.34 85.00 92.13 87.60 95.28 86.80 86.21 94.60 89.26 92.93 86.28 91.48 92.30 96.80 96:60 463