Document 93bxEaY1b9NV2gjk5QKr6Mo97

Reprinted from r- -> ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHARMACOLOGY Vol. 2, 1962 THE SMALLER HALOGENATED ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBONS kL - Bv Maynard B. Chenoweth and Carl L. Hake Biochemical Research Laboratory, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan, and Pitman-Moore Division, The Dow Chemical Company, Indianapolis, Indiana The chemical substances to be considered in this review are those com pounds containing from 1 to 4 carbon atoms and 1 or more halogen atoms. Because of current interest, halogenated ethers are included, although they are not, strictly speaking, hydrocarbons. Compounds containing other func tional groupings obviously excluded themselves. The period, 1935 to June, 1961, is covered as accurately as space and frailty permit. The reader would be well-advised to study both sections, for some widely different view points are held by anesthesiologists and toxi cologists. Anesthetic Aspects The production of general anesthesia is at least as much an art as it is pharmacological engineering. The primary criteria; chat the patient should feel no pain and recover undamaged from the anesthetic and that the surgeon should be able to perform the necessary procedures, can be met by the skilled practitioner with any one of a wide variety of agents, whereas the neophyte can expect trouble with them all. Local conditions and the skills and prejudices of the anesthetist and surgeon have as much to do with the outcome and evaluation of the anes thesia as does the special pharmacology of the anesthetic vapor employed. In truth. "What is one man's poison is another's meat." Chloroform.-- Despite its classic reputation for evil-doing, chloroform has n reacquired supporters, particularly as more reliable methods of administering powerful anesthetics have been recently developed. Although earlier than our general coverage, one should still begin with the detailed Wisconsin study (1). More recently, Duncan el al. (2) reported some 17,000 obstetrical pa tients receiving chloroform alone as their obstetrical anesthetic. These investigators were well pleased with the results and reported no deaths or late toxic manifestations of hepatic and renal damage in this series. The wellknown tendency of chloroform to decrease the strength of uterine contraction can indeed at times be an advantage. That the agent has intrinsic hazard even in the best hands today is indicated by the report of Siebecker & Orth (3) who attempted seven administrations in open thoracic operations. Two of the seven patients died due to acute centrilobar necrosis of the liver, and two more presented clinical and laboratory evidence of toxic hepatitis. It is probable that the poor ventilation consequent upon intrathoradc exploration was a considerable factor and they caution against the use of chloroform under such conditions. The light touch with chloroform is again emphasized by Davison (4). Lately, Dobkin, Johnscon & Skinner (5) have examined chloroform using a modern temperature-compensated vaporizer. With this 363 R&S 136134 /~\ R&S 136135 364 CHENOWETH AND HAKE equipment they found that surgical anesthesia was comfortably accomplished with less chan 1 per cenc chloroform in the inhaled gas stream. In a second study, Dobkin et al. (6) conclude that "chloroform has been inordinately maligned as an anesthetic." AH authors stress the meticulous care which must be used to maintain oxygenation and prevent retention of carbon dioxide. Poe & Mayfield (7) used chloroform in 70 patients needing a nonflammable anesthetic with considerable success when attention was paid to these points and care was taken to avoid the use of chloroform in patients with liver disease. Other reports on chloroform in obstetrics were found (3. 9, 10). EEG and blood pressure correlated well with blood chloroform concentrations in any particular dog (Pearcy et al. 11). Trichloroethylene.--Trichloroethylene differs from the other volatile anesthetics in that it is well-known to undergo extensive metabolism (see II and 12, 13); and in addition, is incompatible with soda lime. While the former is no fundamental drawback, the latter most emphatically is. As patients exhale trichloroethylene for some time after an anesthesia, it negates any possibility of using soda lime or similar materials for CO* reabsorption during an uncertain time after trichloroethylene. An open system without CO* reabsorption is therefore essential (14, 15). The lack of stability of che compound also suggests that possible decomposition will occur in the machine itself (16). The concentration of trichloroethylene may vary aa a result of a variety of factors connected with the particular apparatus employed (17. 18). It is often recommended for dental procedures, particularly to produce analgesia. Bergner et al. (19) reported several thousand successful dental procedures under quite light trichloroethylene added to nitrous oxide. A similar experience was reported by Atterbury & Borkcnhagen (20) and by Boston (21). Spiro (22) reports that the patients will tolerate an endotracheal tube quite nicely under very light trichloroethylene-nitrous oxide. In all these reports, it is evident that the authors have been impressed with the necessity for light anesthesia and a delicate touch. For the "occasional'' dental anesthetist, trichloroethylene certainly seems to leave something to be desired in the way of safety--though perhaps there should be no "oc casional anesthetists.'' There have been many reports of the effectiveness of trichloroethylene as an analgesic or anesthetic in gynecology (Siegler, (23)] an'd in obstetrics (24, 25, 26, 27). These latter studies vary considerably in character, ranging from trichloroethylene anesthesia to trichloroethylene analgesia supplementing nitrous oxide-oxygen. It is almost impossible to compare chcse studies or to draw any conclusion except that a very skilled anesthetist with competent obstetricians can use trichloroethylene with success. In general surgery, Crankshaw (28) feels it has but one contribution to make and that is to provide a high degree of analgesia at a minimum vapor concentration. Stephen (29) remarks that in 105S. 35,000 liters of trichloro ethylene were utilized in che United States for analgesic and anesthetic purposes, but that "the learning process regarding the value of trichloro- HALOGE.VATED ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBONS 365 ethylene has been painful." Norris & Stuart (30) fee! that the place of tri chloroethylene in modern anesthesia is very limited and report seven pre viously unpublished cases of cardiac arrest during such anesthesia. Cardiac damage leading to arrhythmias following non-anesthetic exposures was studied by Dhuner el al. (31). Light anesthesia for major surgery utilizing trichloroethylene is described by Rahter (32) but so many premedicaciona and adjuncts are employed that it almost seems not to require the trichloro ethylene. The lack of explosiveness of trichloroethylene has recommended its use in neurosurgery [v\ KSnig (33)J and the related area of opthalmic surgery where Tennent of New Zealand (34) finds it efficacious. An extensive review on trichloroethylene anesthesia by Atkinson (33) which appeared in 1960 contains many other references and his own experi ence with trichloroethylene. He concludes that it has a significant place in anesthesia and that the disadvantages have been overcome with increasing experience. , ,-y Methylchloroform.--The very low toxicity of this compound. 1,1,1-tri- ' chloroethane is disnissed In II. The anesthetic properties have been described j ^Jby Krantz, Park & Ling (36) in the dog and monkey. Although anesthesia } was satisfactory in many respects, they suggested cautious approach to its trial in man. According to Siebecker et al. (37). it is distinctly less potent clinically than chloroform and, in supplementing nitrous oxide-oxygen, less potent than trichloroethylene, but the depression of the circulation was much greater than the depression of the central nervous system. Dornette & Jones (3S) examined this material as an anesthetic in fifty patients. After noting some of its advantages, they point out the disadvantage of marked depression of circulation and the tendency to develop ventricular rhythms at low concentrations which barely produce adequate anesthesia. It is their impression "that the disadvantages of this compound outweigh its advan tages." ^ r \__ Methoxyflurane.--Following a study of the pharmacology of a series of fluorinated hydrocarbons [Van Poznak & Artusio (39)J and a series of fluorinated ethers (40), methoxyflurane (CHjOCFjCCl-H) was selected for initial clinical trial. A report on the first 100 cases was presented by Artusio el al. (41). Although methoxyflurane boils at 104.6C., it is sufficiently potent so that anesthesia is readily induced when the concentrations of.the agent in the oxygen stream are of the order of 2 to 3 per cent. Higher concentrations are difficult to obtain, which contributes a safety factor not noted in other volatile anesthetics. It is nonexplosive and nonflammable in practical con centrations at operating room temperatures. It is described as a complete anesthetic with profound muscular relaxation. Minimal secretory and auseant effects were obtained. Sensitization to epinephrine was not notable and the major drawback. If any, was the slow recovery, undoubtedly due to remarkable fat deposition of the anesthetic (see (122)). Shortly afterward, Wasmuth el al. (42) reported favorably on 206 cases of anesthesia with methoxyflurane. They also noted an increase in blood sugar. Because of its 03 9? (/> 366 CHENOWETH AND HAKE nonflammable character and the stability of the anesthetic state it produces. Van Poznak, Ray, & Artusio (43) have found it particularly useful for neurological surgery. The tendency to lower the blood pressure is probably positively useful in such work. .All observers have remarked the cutaneous pallor of unexplained origin in the recovery period. Generally, they have found the drug most useful added to nitrous oxide-oxygen. Although earlier observations suggested that it was not possible to sensitize the heart to epinephrine with methoxyflurane, Bamforth et al. (44) found that by using a standardized technique of infusing epinephrine in dogs they could readily produce atrioventricular block and concluded that methoxyflurane was similar to chloroform but not as potent as cyclopropane in sensitizing the heart to epinephrine. Dobkin & Israel (45) found the arrhythmias provoked by an epinephrine challenge during methoxyflurane anesthesia in dogs were less severe than those seen in similar experiments wich trichloroethylene, cyclopropane or halothane, but were similar to those seen with halothane-ether azeotrope or light chloroform. Perphenazine was more effective than hydroxyzine in reducing the arrhythmias, but neither drug abolished them. Dobkin & Fedoruk (46) have compared methoxyflurane and halothane in cross-over experiments in dogs. Hypotension and decreased cardiac output were greater with halothane than with methoxyflurane. Methoxyflurane had a more profound depressant effect on pulmonary ventilation. "Clinical choice between these two agents may be as difficult as that between chloroform and halothane." It is possible to emulsify methoxyflurane and to administer the emulsion intravenously in man (Krantz et al. (47)]. The anesthesia so produced permitted surgery. One of the four subjects developed an urticarial rash, apparently due to the lecithin in the emulsifier. Halothane.--Since its introduction in 1955, this compound. CFjCBrCIH. occasioned more chan 500 papers and no little controversy. This latter essentially revolves about the question of safety in the hands of the general user. There seems to be no doubt that with proper equipment and experience, the expert can produce most excellent results; but that the inexpert can get deeply into trouble very quickly is also true. One of its earliest proponents, Johnstone, has reviewed the first 5 years and concludes "its advantages over other inhalational agents are so obvious that it seems reasonable to expect chat its defects will not be appreciated until a better drug is discovered" (4S). A summary of the characteristics of halothane was presented in "New and Non-official Drugs" (49). The concentration of halothane used in this country has constantly declined until presently concentrations of the order of 0.5 per cent to 0.3 per cent are most commonly employed (Smith & Volpitto (50)]. Johnstone, however, has concentrations as high as 10 per cent available (50- The agent is administered by a variety of means varying from open drop for ophthalmic examination of ambulatory children (Schwartz (52)] to the closed circuit technique. This latter technique has gained increasing popu- R&S 136137 R&S 136138 HALOGENATED ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBONS 367 larity because of the high cost of the drug and increasing experience with the more precise devices for metering it into the gas stream. A number of papers have appeared recently showing that it may be used successfully with rebreathing techniques [Marrett (53), Gusterson (54), Robson et al. (55), Romagnoli et al. (56), Evans & Hutter (57), Hampton & Flickinger (58)j. Galloon (59, 60) has especially discussed the factors to be considered which control the concentration of halothane under these circumstances. The closed circuit concentrations of halothane and other anesthetics are reported by Fabian et cl. (61). Certainly, for the less experienced anesthetist the use of an open technique is probably still to be recommended. [Anon., Lancet, I, 322(1961)]. General evaluations of halothane have been presented by Abajian et al. (62), Carson et al. (63), Costello (64) and Aptvor (65). Swiss reaction is presented in a symposium just published (66). In general, these reports are favorable and the major precautionary statements revolve about the speed with which difficulties develop. Gilbert et al. (67), Bayuk Sc Chen (63), Schettini ct al. (69) and Deacon (70) have described the special use of halothane in neurosurgery. Nova (71), Cutter & King (72), and Sheridan Sc Robson (73) have found it useful in obstetrics because of the very low incidence of vomiting, particularly when light anesthesia is maintained to. prevent uterine inertia. Open cardiac operations are well carried out under halothane anesthesia according to Dawson et al. (74), Bull et al, (75), Zauder et al. (76), Taylor & Stoelting (77), and Stirling el al. (78). Its use with compressed air for cardiac catheterization studies is described by Norton & Kubota (79) as particularly satisfactory. Excellent results in the changing of multiple burn dressings are described by Visser & Tarrow (SO), anesthesia for bronchoscopy in children by Brown (SI) and in dental surgery by Goldman (32), to mention a few specialized uses of this versatile anesthetic. The special pharmacology of halothane has been a subject of consider able study. Duncan & Raventos (S3) have explored the distribution and absorption of halothane in mice. It is evidently not metabolized. The general pharmacology of halothane in man was reviewed by D'Arcy et al. (34). They especially note inhibition of the contractility of the uterus and Marshall et al. (35) have noted depression of gastrointestinal motility. The liver develops a transient fatty change but the kidney is little affected in the mouse, according to Gibson (86). When halothane is administered to dogs under somewhat hypoxic conditions, it has no adverse effect on liver fat, glycogen, and cellular structure. This situation ought to augment its toxicity, according to Haley & Wyant (87). However, fatal acute hepatonephritis was attributed to halothane by Vourc'h et al. (88). In sufficient concentrations halothane has a significant, reversible action on renal activity, according to Blackmore et al. (89) but these changes apppear to be functional rather than parenchymatous tissue damage. According to Doblcin (90), there are essentially no changes of importance R&S 136139 368 CHENOWETH AND HAKE in the acid-base balance during halochane anesthesia, attributable to a specific effect of halochane. A similar study was made by Holmdahl & Payne (91), but we have not seen it in detail. According to Nunn & Matthews (92), the oxygen consumption was depressed to S3 per cent of the basal value, a level comparable with natural sleep, and there is thus no indication that halothane specifically causes a reduction of metabolic rate. The influence of halothane on the heart has been a matter of considerable discussion and apart from the catastrophes reported by Baxter (93) as the result of a defective instrument, it is generally agreed that arrhythmias may occur and may be exaggerated by sympathomimetic drugs (Johnstone & Nisbet (94)]. According to Muir et al. (95) they are quite frequent in cats. Blood well et al. (96) found that concentrations of 1.5 per cent produce con siderable depression of myocardial contractility but that this was not neces sarily deleterious in man. It is generally observed thac a fall in blood pressure occurs during haiothane anesthesia [Black et al. (97), Cullen (9S), Beacon (99), Dundee & Black (100)]. Advantage is actually taken of this effect to produce a degree of hypotension to suit the situation by Murtagh (101) and compared to cyclo propane, halothane anesthesia during hemorrhagic hypovolemia is highly satisfactory, according to Smith et al. (102). The exact cause of the hypoten sion has been a matter of discussion and initially it was thought to be due to sympathetic blockade but Millar & Morris (103) indicate that depression of sympathetic activity cannot be assumed to occur during surgical anesthesia with halothane. Using the exaggerated sympathetic response that Jamaican patients developed during surgery which results in a rise of blood sugar, Keating et al. (104) likewise concluded halothane does not block the sympa thetic responses. A similar conclusion was reached by Enderby (105) and, as a result of extensive pharmacological studies. Burn & Epstein (106) have concluded that it is a direct effect upon the smooth muscle of the vessels of the spleen and of the intestine which acounts for the major part of the fail in blood pressure. Naturally, a certain amount of myocardial depression must occur with all anesthetics and. in the presence of this decreased periph eral resistance, could be expected to produce quite a drop. However, Moyers & Pittinger (107) have concluded that there really is not a statisti cally significant difference between halothane in their hands and other anesthetics with respect to this phenomenon. Actually, Payne el al. (10S) observed a slight increase in cardiac output. Comparative studies.--Bamforth et al. (109) have compared chloroform and halothane by blind study technique in clinical anesthesia. In a series of 100 patients anesthetized with chloroform and halothane as a supplement to nitrous oxide-oxygen anesthesia, and with the anesthesiologist not knowing which drug he was using, they found it was not possible to identify the agent solely by means of its clinical effect. Chloroform and halothane were com pared in dogs using a crossover experimental plan and precision metering devices for the anesthetics. From this detailed study, Dobkin. Harland & HALOGENATED ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBON'S 369 Fedoruk (110) concluded haiochane is usually the better choice. The same authors (111) compared similarly halothane and trichloroethylene. Most notable was the increase of blood pressure under trichloroethylene. In other respects, there seems to have been little difference. The comparison of methoxyflurane and halothane in dogs by Dobbin & Fedoruk (46) has been mentioned above. In clinical anesthesia, Dixon & Matheson (112) found chloroform to be 10 times as potent as ether, and halothane 4 times as potent as ether, while trichloroethylene was less potent than ether. Comparing the cardiovascular effects. Long, Pittinger, & Hamilton (113) found that isolated rabbit hearts were depressed by halothane, chloroform, ether and cyclopropane but that both halothane and chloroform increased, while the others decreased, coronary flow. Both halothane and chloroform depressed the work output and efficiency of the isolated spontaneously beating heart (Nayler, 114). Neither haiochane nor chloroform had any effect upon the oxygen dissociation curve of human blood (Smith. 115). Boniface, Brown, Sc Kronen (116) using a strain-gauge arch preparation in the dog, found that ether, vinyl ether and cyclopropane produced approxi mately equal depressions of heart contractile force while chloroform was consistently more depressant. There was not a clear correlation between myocardial depression and systemic blood pressure. Robertson, Swan & Whirteridge (117 A) have shown ether, chloroform and trichloroethylene activate baroceptors and this effect is significant in controlling blood pressure (117B). Haiochane produced no greater depression of hepatic function chan cyclopropane or ether, according to Little. Barbour &Given(117). According to Jones, Margolis & Stephen, chloroform was the most toxic to the liver of mice, ether the least toxic and di vinyl ether caused frank necrosis. Halothane produced fatty infiltration but no necrosis (1 IS). Green el cl. (119) compared chloroform, ether and halothane on the liver of dogs and found that chloro form produced changes in structure and function which were generally more severe than those produced by halothane or ether. Liver function in dogs after anesthesia with trichloroethylene and chloroform was compared by Richards & Bachman (120) who found that under their conditions chloroform produced a definite adverse effect on liver function while trichloroethylene did not. Liver impairment was found to be no greater after halothane anes thesia than .after ether anesthesia; however, chloroform produced consider able dye retention in che studies of Virtue et al. (121).' Chenoweth et al. (122) anesthetized dogs with ether, chloroform, haio chane and methoxyflurane and analyzed both arterial and venous concentra tions by means of infrared spectrophotometry. The order of potency based on arterial blood levels converted to miliimolar was halothane> methoxyflurane> chloroform> ether. As might be expected, arterial blood levels reflect the clinical state of the animal most accurately. The concent of methoxyflurane in the fat rose slowly and feil much more slowly than was the case with the other three agents. Tissue concentrations R&S 136140 370 CHENOWETH AXD HAKE were determined and the only spectacular finding was the discovery that the adrenal gland contained very much higher concentrations of all anesthetics than other vital tissues. Halochane was particularly noteworthy in this respect. Stewart dc Stolman (123) have collected alt the literature on analysis of body content of volatile anesthetics as well as solvents. Chloroform, trichloroethylene, and ethyl chloride were compared with respect to their effect upon gaseous metabolism in rats by Hattori (124). Ether and cyclopropane were also scudied. The respiratory responses of man were compared by Dundee & Dripps (125) who found chat diethyl ether increases respiratory minute volume while trichloroethylene and trifiuorovinyl ether produced tachypnea leading to inadequate ventilation. The blood sugar during halothane anesthesia was reported by Hunter (126) to remain unchanged while ether and cyclopropane greatly increased the blood sugar level. On the other hand, Chatterjee et al. (127) found that halochane markedly increased the blood sugar levels of mice compared to other anesthetics. Sabawala & Dillon found halothane, chloroform and trichloro ethylene to depress isolated diaphragm and human intercostal muscle in a manner which could not be antagonized by neostigmine, suggesting that the site of action of the volatile anesthetics in depressing muscular responses is the muscle membrane (123). Despite the potentiation of the neuromuscular effects of curare by all four compounds, Watland, et al. (129) found that only anesthesia with ether depressed the response of the gastrocnemius muscle to electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve. Cyclopropane and chloroform actually enhanced muscle contraction while halothane had no effect. In the central nervous system, Davis el al. report that ether is the most potent agent depressing evoked potentials from the midbrain reticular activating system and thalamus, followed, in an order of potency, by chloro form, vinylether and trichloroethylene (150) [see (131) re halothane alone}. The spontaneous electrical activity of the neocorticai and rhinencephalic structures of dogs were studied by Domino & Ueki (132) with various anesthetics. They found a high voltage hvpersynchronous activity during planes 1 and 2 of stage III. With trichloroethylene, this activity spread even further throughout the brain. Dobkin Sc Purkin compared the effect of perphenazine on epinephrineinduced cardiac arrhythmias in dogs under halothane and halothane-ether azeotrope (133). It was found chat epinephrine was far more likely to cause fatal arrhythmias under 0.5 per cent halothane than under 1 per cent halothane-ether azeotrope. Perphenazine was effective in preventing death with halothane and in reducing the duration and severity of arrhythmias with both halothane and the azeotrope. A similar study was performed by Dobkin, Donaldson Sc Purkin (134) using cyclopropane, chloroform and trichloroethylene. It was found that ventricular fibrillation was less likely to occur when epinephrine was injected during anesthesia with 0.5 per cent chloroform than with 25 per cent cyclopropane, or with 1 per cent trichloro- R&S 136141 HALOGENATED ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBONS 371 ethyleae. Premeditation with perphenazine caused a significant reduction in the severity and duration of the cardiac arrhythmias provoked by epineph rine, but it could not eliminate them under acceotabie conditions [see also (45)}. Determination of concentrations of anesthetics are now being made by gas chromatography (135, 136). Miscellaneous.--From their previous studies (39) Artusio & Van Po2nak (137) selected gaseous l,l,l,2-tetrafluoro-2-bromoethane, given the generic name of teflurane, for further clinical trial. Using a 25 per cent mixture in oxygen, excellent anesthesia was induced in 30 patients which was character ized by rapid recovery. Further exploration of this nonflammable, non explosive base stable gas is anticipated. Van Poznak & Artusio (13S) selected l, 1.2-trifluoro-2-bromoethylmethyl ether, given the generic name of roflurane, for further study. It was found to be much like methoxyflurane but somewhat faster in producing anesthesia and more rapid emergence was noted. More detailed reports of these studies are to be anticipated. It should be noted chat there is a marked chemical similarity between haiothane and the three agents studied by this group. One wonders what unknown physical chemical property has caused these four usable agents to emerge from the welter of useless halogenated materials so far studied. Pauling (139) has just suggested "crystal" formations with water molecules. A different series of compounds was investigated by Burns ei al. (140) which included some interesting fluorinated cyclobutenes and butanes. [Cyclobutane itself is not satisfactory clinically (141)f. Seven of 15 com pounds showed definite anesthetic properties and 3 were studied further by Burn, Epstein 2c Goodford (142). Only CF;CHCIF was worthy of further study and it was found to produce serious arrhythmias and hypotension in dogs and cats and was not carried to clinical trial. An investigation of new fluorine compounds in anesthesia has been reported by Glover & Hodgson (143) but we have not seen this in detail. In another study of fluorinated hydrocarbons, Fabian, Dewitt & Carnes (144) uncovered 3-chloro-l,l,2,2-tetrafluoropropane (CHF-CFCH*CI). This compound was studied tn dogs and later in 29 patients. Although it was nonflammable and provided excellent muscular relaxation at light planes of anesthesia, significant disadvantage was noted because of the production of cardiac arrhythmias on induction. The analogous 3-bromo compound is under study. Cole (145) made a thorough study of ethyl chloride as a gaseous anes thetic and concluded that when carefully metered it had properties not unlike trichloroethylene. The advantages seem to be slight, for this seems to be the only report on the subject. Interestingly, fluorinated ethylenes are, like ethylene, incapable of sensitizing the myocardium (146) but none seems to have come to clinical trial. Trifluoroethylvinyl ether does not quite meet the requirements of a R&S 136142 372 CHEXOWETH AND HAKE nonflammable material under all possible circumstances, which may account for the somewhat limited interest in it, despite its excellent anesthetic properties. In an attempt to improve upon the flammability limits, Krantz, Ling & Kozler (147) formed an azeotropic mixture with it and Genetron 113 (l,l,2*trifluoro-2,2,l-trichloroethane). The results were sufficiently interest ing to warrant a single human trial. The flammability limits of the azeotrope are given as 6.2 per cent in dry oxygen for the lower limit. Earlier studies with the undiluted material were reported by Sadove, Balagot & Linde (143) who found alveolar gas levels of 3.2 to 8.2 volumes per cent resulted in blood levels of 17 to 38 mg/100 ml and produced satisfactory surgical anesthesia not very different from diethyl ether. Later, Gainza el al. (149) examined the com pound in dogs in detail and noted several differences from diethyl ether in cluding that assisted respiration very easily became controlled respiration and that hypotension occurred in several patients without warning. A neutral position was the result of the study by Dundee, Linde & Dripps (150) on 300 human anesthesias. The EEC patterns were studied by Brechner & Dornette (151) who found only six specific patterns compared to the seven previously noted with ether. It has been shown to be stable in vivo by Musser, Park & Krantz (152). Its use in dentistry is reported by Slater (153) but the ability to strike sparks from teeth (Bourne & Morton (154)] would seem to be a contraindication. Hexafluorodiethyl ether was introduced by Krantz et al. (156) as an inhalant convuisant. Its use in psychiatry for production of convulsions is noc germane. When halothane is dissolved in diethyl ether in the proportion of 31.7 parts of ether to 68.3 parts of halothane it all distills 3t one temperature. 51.5C. Such a phenomenon is known as azeotropism. Boivin. Hudon & Jacques (157) prepared such a mixture and found it to be an effective anes thetic (15S). Pharmacologically, it is equivalent to administering halothane and diethyl ether simultaneously in this constant proportion and the same effect could be achieved with separate anesthesia machines. Brown has reported that in oxygen the lower limits of explosiveness are 7.25 per cent. It will not propagate flames in air and the liquid has no flash point (159). The physical chemistry of the mixture has been further studied by Hall, Norris & Downs (160). The mixture has been condemned by Raventos & Dee (161) as being less satisfactory clinically as well as explosive and byJohnstone, Evans & Murphy (162) as "illogical." On the other hand. Dobkin (163) believes it offers significant advantages over halothane alone and that the ether counteracts many of the disadvantageous effects of halothane. Comparison of the cardiovascular effects have been made by Dobkin, Harland Sc Fedoruk (164) and by Wyant el al. (165) and there is less depres sion of blood pressure and some slight desensitization to epinephrine not unlike that observed when ether is added to cyclopropane. Its use in pul monary surgery is recommended by Dechene & Claude (166) because of the decrease in respiratory and ventilatory difficulties and permissible use of the HALOGEXATED ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBON'S 373 electric cautery. Explosiveness is not entirely eliminated and thus the mix ture might be very similar to trifluoroethylvinyl ether. Toxicological Aspects Industrial uses of these compounds are enormous and ubiquitous and with such use has grown a vast toxicological literature. As indicated in the opening paragraphs of this review, the space allowed has limited the reference to literature appearing during the past five years. One should consult Patty (167), Browning (16S), and von Oettingen (169) for background information and a comprehensive understanding of the^complece toxicological aspects of these compounds. ^ _ Cls,* ti-V. 'A/ . , . , Metnyl chloride.--Most of the recent toxicological papers concerning methyl chloride deal with human poisonings. Five cases, one of which resulted in death, were reported by N'oro & Pettersson (I/O). Besides the symptoms reported previously, the authors observed slight leukocytosis in two cases, and lowering of the S-T segment in the ECO. Deafness and delirium, with neurological changes of hypokinetic or ataxic character, were reported by Bongard Sc Ivanova (171). They also suggest chat acute intoxica tions can be accompanied by disturbance of internal organs, especially the liver. Roche el al. (172) also found chat the liver and kidneys were affected in acute cases of intoxication in animals and in fatal human cases. KlimkoviDeutschova summarized the neurological picture from 100 cases of methyl chloride poisoning (173). Acute poisoning generally was revealed by a pre ponderance of vestibular and cerebellar brain stem signs, with marked dis turbances of cortical dynamics and subcortical relationships. The chronic picture was one of pseudoneurasthenia, central encephalopathy, and poly neuritic and polyradicutar peripheral symptoms. Redford-Ellis i Gowenlock (174) have initiated studies on the uptake of methyl chloride by various tissues. Interesting preliminary results indicated that brain tissue shows a high uptake of the chemical, with the lipid com ponent very active in uptake. However, oxygen consumption of brain homog enates was unchanged after several hours of exposure. 1 '! ` .\fetkyl bromide.--Very few well-documented cases of methyl bromide poisoning'have*Been reported recently. One excellent report by Rathus & t Landy (175) details seven cases of poisoning which occurred accidentally during a large-scale fumigation. None was fatal; however, four of the individ uals had not recovered completely. Blood bromide levels of from 13.5 to 40 mg/100 ml were found in these four patients upon admission to the hospital, while the three who recovered completely had bromide levels of 2.4 to 9.6 mg/100 ml. These authors recommend Conway's (.\ficrodiffusion Analysis and Volumetric Error. 3rd Ed., Crosby Lockwood. Pub!.. London, 1950) micro-diffusion method for estimating blood bromide in methyl bromide poisoning. Colorimetric methods such as the gold chloride method are not accurate enough for levels below 10 mg/100 ml. Martorano (176) ascribed symptoms exhibited by workers involved in methyl bromide prepa- R&S 136143 374 CHENOWETH AND HAKE radon to exposure to this chemical. However, a lack of confirmatory air and blood bromide analyses makes the positive diagnosis of methyl bromide poisoning less assuring. The importance of EEC in the diagnosis of methyl bromide poisoning was stressed by Roche ei cl. (177). 2- " .---------Bromochloromethane.--Torkelson, Oven & Rowe (173) studied the toxi' cologicai effects of this fire-extinguishing agent in 5 species of animals. Rats V were exposed in single doses to concencrarions ranging from <500 to 50,000 ppm for periods of 0.1 to 7 hr. Deaths were due to prolonged anesthesia and delayed deaths in survivors were exceptional. The maximum concentration which did not cause observable injury was 7,500 ppm. Rats, rabbits, guinea pigs and mice were exposed 7 hr daily for 6 months to levels of 500 ppm with no effect except on female rats. Significant adverse effects were limited to increases in liver and kidney weights and reversible microscopic liver injury. No bromism was noted, chough all species had slightly elevated blood bro mide levels. The authors recommend a maximum allowable concentration of 400 ppm for repeated human exposures, with a timeweighted average con centration not to exceed 200 ppm. Dickloromethane.--This is one of the least toxic of the short-chain chlorinated hydrocarbons. However, its low boiling point, 39.SC., and high vapor pressure, 420 mm Hg at 25C., allows rapid evaporation, so that a \J hazardous atmosphere can be created. Allen (179) briefly described the industrial hygiene required in the safe handling of this compound, It is quite nonflammable, but if it is brought into contact with incandescent metal or an open flame, phosgene and hydrogen chloride, the decomposition products common to many chlorinated hydrocarbons, may be formed. Geritsen & Buschmann (180) attributed 2 deaths of workers using paint removers in an unventiiated room where a kerosene stove was burning to the decomposi tion products of dichloro me thane. A Russian report (IS 1) indicates that ascorbic acid concentration in a number of organs of the rat rises sharply after ex posure to methylene chloride. Chlorofluorometkane.--Chlorofiuoromethanes have utility as propellants in cosmetics. Toxicity and cutaneous tolerance (182), as well as effects on the ciliary activity of the respiratory epithelium (1 S3), have been studied. Chloroform.--Chloroform is similar to many of the other short-chain chlorinated hydrocarbons in its general capability to cause liver damage. Brauer, Leong & Holloway (1S4) srudied the early changes which take place I in an isolated perfused rat liver preparation exposed to the vapors of chloro- ^ form. Exposure levels were used which in civo are known to produce liver injury compatible with survival of a rat or dog. Changes such as decreased bile flow, increased glucose concentrations in the perfusate, increased tissue sodium space, and early histological changes similar to those seen in vivo, were observed. The authors concluded chat a biochemical lesion, rather than a lesion due to the release of sympatholytic agents in the blood, initiates chloroform injury to the liver. Other experiments carried out to determine the effect of chloroform upon R&S 136144 B&S 136145 HALOGENATED ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBON'S 375 the liver revealed the following observations. The permeability of surviving cells in liver slices was increased when chloroform was added to the prepara tion (Opie (185)]. Amasio (136) found that the dpn level of chloroform poi soned rat liver was 25 to 30 per cent lower chan in normal control liver. Giindisch & Feszt (137) injected chloroform subcutaneously in rats. Histochemical studies revealed an increase in alkaline and acid phosphatase and a decrease in lipase enzyme activities in the liver parenchyma during the necrotic process, and a reversal in activities during healing. The enzymic changes preceded the morphological lesions. The present state of knowledge regarding chloroform toxicity to the liver makes it difficult to assess the significance of these observations. A further study on the effect of chloroform on the necrosis of renal tubules in the C3H strain of mice was carried out by Culliford <Sc Hewitt (L8S). This unusual necrotic effect on the renal tubules of the male mouse is the basis for a method to determine androgenic activity of injected compounds [Hewitt (189)1. Acute poisonings of humans by chloroform seem to have been reduced to a minimum (Gaultier et al. (190)}. Challen it al. (191) describe the results of repeated haman exposures to concentrations ranging from 77 to 327 ppm. Medical examination of workers revealed various complaints which could be correlated with chloroform exposure. Although liver damage was probable, it could not be detected in those workers who submitted to liver function tests. The authors recommended that the maximum allowable concentration for chronic exposure should not exceed 30 ppm. Since this publication, the American Conference of Govern mental Industrial Hygienists has lowered the recommended maximum allowable concentration from 100 to 50 ppm. Work still in progress in our laboratories indicates that chloroform is more toxic to animals upon long term exposure than previously assumed, therefore this downward revision seems entirely justified. In an attempt to find a protective agent against chloroform poisoning, DiMaggio (192) found that 4-methylesculetin (2 mg/100 g body weight, daily) had a mild protective action in chloroform poisoning of male rats. However, the liver was the only organ which was studied histologically, Bromoform.-- Bromoform was found to be effective in the in vitro dis solution of gallstones, therefore it was tested in vivo in humans (193). The \authors suggest either direct introduction into the bile duct, or oral adminis tration, since 50 per cent of that administered orally to human subjects passed through the biliary duct unchanged. Surprisingly, the authors re ported no adverse effect on the mucous membrane, even by concentrated solutions. It should be pointed out that von Oettingen' (169) lists three fatalities and many more cases of illness resulting from accidental over dosage of bromoform to children. Carbon tetrackloridc.--This compound has continued to be the object of frequenfstudy during the past few years. Importance as a cause of poison ings has maintained an interest in understanding the mode of action and in 376 CHEN'OWETH AND HAKE having means of assessing toxic injury. In addition, it has remained a much used tool in physiological research, particularly in relation to the liver. A recent review by Lewis (194) summarizes the present understanding of poisoning in man. An appreciable number of cases still occur in industry (193 to 199) and in the home (198, 200, 201). Occasionally phosgene is implicated where decomposition has occurred (202). In general, this recent experience agrees with earlier reports that seem ingly mild exposures can produce serious poisoning (195, 196), that ethanol and other factors predispose (193, 201) and chat industrial exposures must be kept at very low levels (10 ppm or less) to avoid minimal effects (197). Of interest here is the showing by Stewart et al. (203) that oral ethanol in rabbits led to higher concentrations of CCU in the blood upon inhalation of the vapor. Exhalation of CCU vapor has been shown in man after a control led 3-hr exposure to 10 ppm (204). Work has continued in the past few years using a variety of compounds as protective or therapeutic agents for CCU poisonings in animals. Some of this work has been directed toward discovering an effective agent, while some has utilized the agent as a tool in studying the mechanism of action of ecu. Methionine has been studied previously and was recently reported to have aided in the rapid improvement of 3 human cases (199). In rats injected with ecu, Kobayashi (205) reported chat the administration of DL-methionine reduced the increased lipid content and decreased the glycogen concent of the liver.'Asagoe (206) reported chat methionine prevented the increase in collagen content of the liver. Ocher sulfur-containing compounds which have been utilized for further study in animals because of their protective action are glutathione (207), methylthiouracil (203), sulfaguanidine (209) and chioctic acid (6,3-dithiocaprylic acid) (210 to 214). The last compound has received considerable study in Italy and has been reported to have shown favorable results as a therapeutic agent in other human liver diseases (2 10. 211). Agents which stimulate the production of pyridine nucleotides, nicotinic add and its precursor, DL-tryptophan, were found to protect rats from acutely lethal doses of CCU by Gallagher and co-workers (215. 216). The authors postulate that the increased tissue levels of pyridine nucleotides maintain higher mitochondrial coenzyme levels and thus sustain respiratory activity during a critical period. 5-Hydroxytryptamine was also found by Fiore-Donati and co-workers (217, 218) to exert a protective effect against acute damage, perhaps through a sparing action on tryptophan. Of the vitamins studied for their protective action against CCU poison ing, Bij has received the most attention (219 to 224). Kasbekar and co workers (219, 220) postulate that the protection by vitamin Bi* in acute carbon tetrachloride poisoning is non-specific and may be due to an effect on mitochondrial integrity. When studied on a chronic basis. Vaisler and coworkers (221) found that it protected against the loss of liver glycogen and R&s 136146 HALOGENATED ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBON'S 3 77 loss of liver function. Japanese workers (225) have reported chat vitamin E protects against the increase in 14, 16 and IS carbon saturated fatty acids in the liver, exerting its influence as an antioxidant. Pantothenic acid has been reported (226) to accelerate the repair of necrotic areas of the liver after CCli poisoning. It was found to have no effect on the increase of liver collagen produced during CC1 poisoning (227). Protective and therapeutic action against CClt damage in rats by isolated rat liver mitochondria has been reported by Laudahn 2c Luders (228, 229, 230). The highest therapeutic effects were obtained using mitochondria with intact respiratory chain phosphorylation. Bovine liver mitochondria were also used and found to be somewhat less effective. Tanyot & Friedman (231) have more recently reported a cat liver preparation to be effective In reducing fatty infiltration in the livers of cats given CCL intramuscularly. Hog and calf brain extracts have extended survival time of rabbits and guinea pigs poisoned with CCL (232). Other compounds which have been reported to have more or less protec tive action against CCL poisoning are lipotropic agents (233), betaine (234), sodium lactate (235) and aminoacetonitrile [NH:- CHj* C : N*I (236). Determination of liver function after CCL poisoning by the determina tion of enzyme, metal, and/or vitamin levels in the serum has received considerable attention during the past five years. Because many of these experiments were designed to study liver function, and CCL was used only to cause liver damage, attention is drawn to those that seem most pertinent from the viewpoint of carbon tetrachloride toxicity. Since Wroblewski and co-workers (237) demonstrated late in 1955 that serum transaminase levels rise significantly in rats after CCL Intoxication, many papers have appeared which demonstrate the usefulness of this and other serum enzyme determinations to detect liver injury due to CCL. The papers of Cornish and Block (238. 239. 240) demonstrate the sensitivity of this determination to exposures of low magnitude and also its advantages over some other enzyme determinations. Other studies (241 to 246) on serum transaminase levels after CCL poisoning have also demonstrated its usefulness as a liver function test. Fleisher & Wakim (247) report that the serum glutamic oxalacetic transaminase can be divided into two enzymes (GOT land GOT II) after CCL poisoning of the dog. Increase in serum levels of another enzyme, ornithine carbamyl trans ferase. may be more indicative than the transaminases of exclusive liver damage because the former is almost unique to the liver. Studies by Reichard (248) demonstrated the value of this determination after CCL poisoning of dogs. Other enzymes which increased in the serum of various animals after CCli poisoning are xanthine oxidase (238. 239, 249), lactic dehydrogenase, malic dehydrogenase (241); fumarase (250), alkaline and acid phosphatase (temporarily) (251), quinine oxidase (252), and arginase (253, 254). Esterase shows an initial rise but drops the second day after exposure (240). The generally accepted hypothesis has been that CCl effects an increase of many R&S 136147 136148 to 378 CHENOWETH AND HAKE of these enzymes in the serum by causing damage to the liver ceil wall, thereby releasing the enzyme to the serum. Studies have shown that esterase and xanthine oxidase (240), fumarase (250), alkaline and acid phosphatase (251) and arginase (254, 255) concentrations in the liver decrease initially after CCl< poisoning. However, glutamic oxalacetic transaminase was found to increase slightly in the liver (240). Other enzymes which showed a decrease in the liver but have not been reported as having increased in the serum are succinic dehydrogenase (250, 256, 257, 25S), aminoxidase, procainesterase, coenzyme A (259) and aconicase (250). These may be inhibited rather than released to the serum. In contrast to those enzymes which increase in the serum, cholinesterase (260, 261) and serum esterase (262) show decreases after CC1 poisoning. A relationship between serum iron levels and hepatocellular necrosis due to CC1 poisoning in dogs was reported by Reismann e'. cl. (265). The authors of this review have also studied serum iron levels after repeated exposures of dogs to CCU. An increase was noted at the beginning of a week's exposure and a decrease as the exposure progressed. It is possible that this increase and decrease is related to the previously mentioned xanthine oxidase levels in the liver (264). Larson & Morrill (265) found fairly good correlation between acute CC1 poisoning and increased bromsulfophthalien retention, an old standby for liver function determination. Plasma and liver vitamin Bi- levels in rats were studied by Okuda and co-workers (266, 267) after CCL injection. In rats containing normal liver vitamin Bu levels, plasma levels increased and the liver level decreased. This was confirmed by Karo 5c Murakami (263). Plasma amino acids were determined after CCI poisoning in rats by Knauff & VVindsheimer (269). Initially, levels of most of the amino acids except glutamic acid and arginine increased abruptly, giving a total amino S' of 200 per cent of normal. By 48 hrs they had become varied and the total amino N had returned to normal. Analysis of plasma and liver proteins (270, 271, 272) after poisoning also failed to indicate that their measurement would be of real value for diagnosis. Mizunuma (273) reported chat 0.3 and 0.6 rnl/kg of CCl, injected subcutaneously into rabbits caused directly related increases in serum mucoprotein levels. However, Lin (274) reported a signifi cant decrease in serum mucoprotein levels when rabbics were given 0.2 ml/kg of CCIt. These results are certainly incompatible. The fact that the liver is one of the primary target organs of CCt< poison ing has been known for years, but the mechanism'of action has been the subject of considerable research only during the past few years. In the follow ing paragraphs, the mechanism-of-acrion hypotheses of several different groups of workers will each be reduced to simple terms. Ac present, the state of knowledgeof the over-all mechanismof action has not advanced far enough to allow one to fit each of these hypotheses into the cotal picture of carbon tetrachloride poisoning. One of the early hypotheses was that of Christie & Judah (275). They HALOGENATED ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBONS 379 R&S 136149 theorized that CCU acted upon liver cells by penetrating the membrane and causing a progressive disruption of mitochondrial function which ended in deathof the cell. This hypothesis is also supported by Frunder and co-workers (276 to 2S1) and many others. It was continued by Judah & Rees (2S2) as being plausible though the original was attacked on the grounds that the changes resulting from mitochondrial disruption were of a secondary nature. Calvert & Brody (2S3) had noted that ethylene diamine tetra-acetate pro vided some protection against these disturbances in mitochondrial function, and that these disturbances generally occurred about 20 hrs after an acutely administered dose, while fatty infiltration occurred much earlier. Therefore, some consider the mitochondrial dysfunction of secondary importance, especially regarding initial injury. Working on the theory that the damage to the fiver mitochondria after CCl4 poisoning may primarily be caused by anoxia, Brody and co-workers (2S4, 2S5, 2S6) discovered that the toxic effects on the liver of the intact rat could be alleviated to varying degrees by preventing the release of agents from the sympathetic nervous system of the animal. Following study of adrenergic blocking agents, adrenalectomy and spina! transection, they proposed "that carbon tetrachloride does not act directly upon the liver parenchymal cells but rather that the effects usually observed are promul gated via an action upon the central nervous syscem. or more precisely the sympathetic outflow of the autonomic nervous system" (2S7). Some reports (283, 2S9) do not lend complete support to this hypothesis. Because fatty infiltration of the cells of the liver precedes mitochondrial damage, Recknagel and co-workers (290, 291) studied these early changes in order to determine the primary biochemical lesion. They observed (292) that the maximum concentration of CC!< in the liver occurred approximately ti hrs after ingestion, and chat thereafter there occurred a steady decline in its concentration. Concomitant with this build-up to maximum concentration of the chemical in the liver, they found a rapid increase in liver triglycerides and pathological changes in the endoplasmic reticulum (293, 294). From this work, and the fact that simultaneous administration of Triton with CCI* prevented the increase of triglycerides in the serum (295), the group postu lated that "the primary lesion responsible for the pathological accumulation of liver fat involves inhibition or destruction of a hepatic triglyceridesecreting mechanism" (296). Of interest to this hypothesis is the finding by Rossi (297) that there occurred an early impairment in the ability of the liver to activate fatty acids. Rees and co-workers (298, 299, 300) have recently hypothesized "that carbon tetrachloride irreversibly damages a reaction that is nonessentia! in the short term for the survival of the cell, and that as one consequence of this primary injury there is a secondary disturbance, for example, the entry of sodium and water into the cell" (301). Studies of interest to this hvpochesis have been conducted by Gallagher (302) and Thiers et al. (303). Many more papers have been published during the past five years which 3S0 CHEXOWETH AND HAKE will contribute to the over-all understanding of the mode of action of CC1*. These can be referred to only briefly. Perfused livers of rats which had been injected with small amounts of CC1 were studied by Plaa & Hine (304). Dysfunction of the liver could be detected though the dose was so small that no histologically destructive changes could be detected. Several reports on the detoxification ability of the liver after poisoning with CCU have appeared (305, 306, 30"). fslami et al. (30$) found no great difference between normal liver tissue after poisoning, and poisoned tissue which had been regenerated after partial hepacectomy. It was found by Post et al. (309) that the race of regeneration of the liver after acute poisoning with CCU decreases with age in the rat. Hanldss (310) reported that rats, treated with sufficient CCI4 when young to cause annular hepatic cirrhosis attained a substantially greater size at i to 1 year than did controls. Tritiated thymidine was utilized by Leevy et cl. to study the regen eration of the liver tissue in rats after poisoning (311). Histochemica! investigations of livers poisoned with CCl< include studies on enzyme levels of proliferating connective tissues (312). fatty infiltration and necrosis (313), electron micrography of cells (314), vascular and cellular changes (315), enzyme activity and oxygen consumption (316), fat deposi tion and enzyme activity (317. 313. 319) and the influence of high protein diets on necrosis (320). Smuckler et al. [Biochem. Biopkys. Res. Commiin.. 5. 270 (I960)] report severe depression of fibrinogen and albumin synthesis parelleling the earliest changes in the endoplasmic reticulu m. Though it has been known for many years that CCh also affects che kidneys, very little work has been reported in this fieid during the past five years. Enzymic and morphological changes were noted in the kidney 4 to 2 hours after poisoning by Kdnig et al. (321). The authors reported that the damage induced by CCI in the kidney is a primary toxic response and is not secondary to liver injury. Grass! and co-workers (322) studied the protective effects of several hormones, singly and in combination, against kidney damage evoked by CC1. Combinations were somewhat effective, particularly against tubular degeneration. Loyke and co-workers (323) reported that subcutaneous injections of CCU reduce experimental renal hypertension in rats. Kaltenbach (324) has studied the blood picture of mice and rats poisoned with CCli, while Wirtschafteroc DeMeritt (325) reported on the reticuloendo thelial response. Effects were noted in the mast cells and in their number after vapor exposure of rats to CCI* (326). Studies have been made on animals to assess the effect of CC1( upon the induction of tumors (327, 328, 329). The compound would probably be classed as a carcinogen by some; though there were no reports that che com pound by itself is capable of causing neoplasia. One report indicated thac the prolonged administration of the compound inhibited tumor formation in intrasplenic ovarian grafts in the rat (330). Ethyl chloride.--Only one recent paper (331) on ethyl chloride has come R&S 136150 HALOGENATED ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBONS 3S1 to our attention. The abstract indicates that the chemical was liberally appli > theshaven thighs of white rats. Edema of subcutaneous tissue and ffect- .pon muscle and nerve fibers were noced. Nervous tissue became >rma! 10 days after exposure ceased, coinciding with the reduction of the 'ammatory reaction. Widespread clinical use attests to the relative in* jousness of cutaneous application. 'nyl chloride.--Of the short-chain halogenated hydrocarbons utilized as Tiers for polymerization, vinyl chloride is probably the most important, recent papers have helped to delineate the toxicological picture, tiger and co*workers (332) recently studied the effects of acute to anesthetic concentrations of vinyl chloride after 2 accidental 'ndustry. Danziger (333) described the circumstances involved in xses. The pathological findings in both were cyanosis, conjuctival stion of internal organs, especially lungs and kidneys, and failure *o dot. Since no vinyl chloride could be detected at autopsy 3 death, mice, rats, and guinea pigs were exposed to levels of at vinyl chloride in air for periods of time up to 30 min. A 10 per cent produced injury in rats and mice, while 30 per Guinea pigs were less susceptible. 3 of 5 surviving at a 3 per cent for 30 min. The principal pathological changes m in the lungs, liver and kidneys, pufmonary edema and ire of the blood to dot. These results tended to confirm he overexposure of humans. -abbits, guinea pigs and dogs, of repeated exposures to ted by Torketson et al. (334). After exposing animals week, for up to 6 months, to air concentrations of \ it was only at the last concentration, 50 ppm, tely { if deleterious effects. At a concentration ' slig .tcrease in the average weight of the rat authors have recommended that the maximum 'eared exposures in the workroom be 100 ppm age for daily exposure should not exceed 50 - recommended theshoid limit of 500 ppm as of Governmental Industrial'' Hygienists XL ~ / ^ structural isomers of dichloroethane. ',2-dichloro compound, usually called much more extensively than the Li nes called ethylidene chloride. The :thin the last five years to any work .bane as the subject compound, neare cited. Where theauthorsof dichloroethane will be used, of 1.2-dichloroethane upon the icy of rats which had received 382 CHENOWETH AND HAKE the compound intramuscularly and in rabbits which had been acutely exposed by inhalation. The compound caused bradycardia, st segment depression, atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction disturbances, cardiac excitability, and a progressive decrease in the blood pressure to death. However, respiratory activity was reported to be improved. Slyusar (336) indicated that light narcosis in rats as a result of dichloroethane aerosol exposure for 4 hr caused a surprisingly large fall in serum and tissue acetylcholinesterase 16 to 18 hr later. Cholinesterase activity in the liver, heart and pylorus was lowered approximately 30 per cent, while the serum level was lowered 43 per cent. Danishevski! (337) has reported chat dichloroethane administered internally to rabbits lowers blood phosphatase levels 12 to SO per cent. The ascorbic acid content of the organs of male rats after both acute and repeated exposures to dichloroethane was studied bv Malinskaya and Yanovskaya (33S). The ascorbic acid content of the liver was increased SO per cent over controls after an acute exposure to 20 mg/I (5000 ppm) of the vapor in air. while moderate increases of ascorbic acid were reported in the spleen, brain, heart and intestines. After a month's repeated exposure to 0.6 mg/1 (150 ppm), increases were detected only in the liver and brain. Decreases in cholinesterase and phosphatases due to liver injury could be expected from dichloroethane intoxication, but the reason for the increase in tissue ascorbic acid levels is speculative. Analyses for dichloroethane were made in tissues of rabbits after acute poisoning, presum ably by the oral route. The gastrointestinal tract contained the greatest amount of that which was recovered, while the least was found in the liver. The material could be detected in cadavers 25 days after poisoning of the animals (339). Several cases of acute poisoning by dichloroethane have appeared tn the literature in the past few years. Two fatal cases due to accidental ingestion, one a man of 79 and the other a child of 2, were reported by Weiss (340). In both cases, the outstanding symptoms developed in the central nervous system. There was also erosion in the gastrointestinal tract and toxic parenchymatous lesions of the liver and kidney, but these were unaccom panied by a clinical hepatorenal syndrome. Menschick (341) listed 27 cases of poisoning by inhalation of 1.2-dichloroechane previously recorded in the literature and described in detail 4 more which he observed in painters. Two were intoxicated to the point of semiconsciousness, while the other two were less severely affected. The author reported a hepatorenal syndrome in alt four cases, with renal injury being transient. He suggests that this compound should be included in the "very dangerous substances" list, it being 70 per cent more toxic to animals than CC!< (acutely). Two other papers have appeared in the literature reporting acute poisonings by dichloroethane. Two cases were reported by Morozov (542) and a fatal case caused by a fumigant containing 70 per cent 1,2-dichloroetliane and 30 per cent CC1 has been reported (343). It is of interest to compare recommended levels of repeated exposure of humans to dichloroethane in Russia and the United States. In Russia, R&S 136152 A A HALOGENATED ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBON'S 3S3 Borisova (344) recommended a maximum allowable concentration of dichloroethane in air of 4 mg/m* (~I ppm). Her findings indicated that concentra tions of 6 mg/mJ and up cause increasing vasoconstriction, decreasing lightsensation of the eyes, and reflex changes in rate, depch and rhythm of respiration. The average olfactory threshold was reported to be 23.2 mg/m1 (/~6 ppm). In the United States, the maximum allowable concentration as /recommended by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial ' Hygienistsis 100 ppm (~400 mg/m1). 71 > Dibromoethane.:--Dibromoethane is commonly referred to as ethylene dibromfde. Olmstead (345) has thoroughly described a fatal case involving the oral consumption of 1,2-dibromoechane. complicated by the fact that the patient had taken alcohol in excess for several years. Focal necrosis in the proximal tubules of the kidney, previously unreported in acute oral studies in animals, was noted. The effect of dibromoethane on the pituitary gonado tropic hormone of hens was studied by Olomucki (346). Feeds containing even small amounts of the chemical decreased egg sizes markedly and eventu ally resulted in complete cessation of laying. Egg size could be increased again by injecting follicle-stimulating hormone. The author believes that the chemical inhibits the formation or release of the hormone from the pituitary. t/1,1,1'Trichlorocthanc.--The industrial importance of this solvent has increased tremendously the past few years. Torkelson el al. (347) have /reported on the results of repeated exposures of animals to varying vapor concentrations of 1,1,1-trichloroethane. Rats, guinea pigs, rabbits and monkeys were unaffected after six mortchs of repeated seven-hour exposures five days per week to 300 ppm. Male rats tolerated exposure of 0.5 hr per day to 10,000 ppm with no organic injury. The primary effect of the vapors of this solvent at high concentrations was anesthesia, with only a slight capacity to cause reversible injury to the lungs and liver, The authors also conducted ingestion, eye contact and skin contact studies. Results indicated no unusual hazards of handling in ordinary industrial operations. Human subjects, acutely exposed to 1,1,1-trichloroethane, reported lighc-headedness at 900 to 1000 ppm. Stewart el al. (34S) carried out controlled exposures of human subjects to 1,1,1-trichloroethane vapor concentrations of approximately 500 and 1000 ppm. The chemical in the post-exposure expired air was determined quantita tively by infrared spectroscopy. It could be detected in the expired air of individuals 20 hr after a 3-hr exposure to 955 ppm. The concentration of the chemical in the expired air was related to the level of exposure when expo sures were of equal duration. The metabolism of 1,1,1-trichloroethane in the rat after an intraperitoneal injection of the carbon-14 labeled compound was studied by Hake el al. (349). Approximately 98 per cent of the compound was recovered in the expired air as unchanged 1,1,1-trichloroethane. One half per cent of the dose appeared as carbon dioxide, while the majority of the remainder appeared in the urine as the glucuronide of 2,2,2-crichIoroethanol. Torkelson el al, (347) indicated knowledge of two fatal cases of over- R&S 136153 R&S 136154 384 CHEXOWETH AND HAKE exposure to 1,1,1-trichIoroethane, and another has been brought to the attention of the authors. Each of these fatalities was due to an anesthetic death resulting from over-exposure to the chemical in a tank or reactor. Trichloroethylene.--Several reviews on the toxicology of trichloroethylene have appeared in the literature since 1955. A review* by Grisler & Gallina (550) appeared in Italian in 1956. Bradodej & Vyskocil (351) published a most comprehensive re%"ie\v the same year. Others which have appeared more recently are those by Williams (352), Edson (353), and Haas (354). The studies of Baker (355) have verified the earlier findings which indi cated that trichloroethylene adversely affects the central nervous system. Although no neuropachological changes could be detected in dogs after death from single acute exposures, repeated acute exposures caused scattered degenerative neuronal changes, while chronic exposures appeared to destroy selectively the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum. The conditioned reflex method of determining abnormal nervous responses in cats was used by Khorvat & Formanek (356). Four animals were studied during repeated exposures to trichloroethylene at a concentration of 0.4 mg/I (75 ppm) in the atmosphere. Their results suggested that disturbances occurred in the dy namics of cortical activity at this level of exposure. Grandjean (357) reported that exposure of rats to higher concentrations. 200 to S00 ppm for 3 hrs, did not modify the conditioned responses or the response time of animals. He found an increased excitability at these higher levels. It has also been re ported (358) that human subjects exposed to low levels of trichloroethylene vapor show signs of nonspecific damage to nervous processes. These workers also found correlated decreases between blood levels of cholesterol and ascor bic acid in some cases. Several papers have been published on the health of workers exposed to trichloroethylene in industrial operations. Usually the levels of trichloro ethylene, trichloroethanol and/or trichloroacetic acid excreted in the urine were measured during these studies. Vague symptoms but no organic defects were reported by Hickish et al. (359) in a study of an operation where atmos pheric concentrations of trichloroethylene varied from 62 to 637 ppm. Similar vague symptoms were reported by Mazza & Cascini (360). Several cases of human exposure were reported by Abrahamsen (379, 3S0). A thorough review of the 334 cases of suggested trichloroethylene poison ing in Sweden during the decade 1941-50 was published by Andersson (364). Again, the symptoms were often vague, but intensity of symptoms could usually be correlated with degree of exposure. She reported that changes in liver function in rabbits were dimcult to obtain at the low levels of exposure comparable to the reported industrial exposures. This has been confirmed in humans (365, 366), even after chronic exposures to polluted atmospheres. Increased urobilin excretion appeared to be the most significant of the many liver function tests (367). Serum transaminases were generally found to be normal (368). A report of deleterious effects on blood coagulation in workers exposed to trichloroethylene was published by Guyotjcannin & Guyotjean- HALOGEXATED ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBON'S 385 R&S 136155 nin (369). Reinl (370) ascribed a case of scleroderma to trichloroethylene exposure in industry. Other papers reporting either chronic or acute indus trial exposures have been noted (371 to 375). It is generally agreed that acute exposures result in anesthesia, with little aftereffect. Repeated ex posures to low levels cause vague nervous symptoms and insignificant liver damage. There seems to be considerable disagreement as to the significance of these vauge symptoms, and therefore there is disagreement as to the maximum allowable concentrations to which 3 worker can be repeatedly exposed without deleterious effect. The metabolism and metabolic products of trichloroethylene have re ceived considerable attention. Soucek & Vlachovi (376, 377. 37S) have published several papers on the excrecion and analysis of trichloroethylene metabolites In human urine. Rubino and co-workers (361, 362, 363), in a series of papers, thoroughly studied the face of absorbed trichloroethylene in workers. It has been reported (362) chat 30 per cent of that absorbed from an acute exposure was exhaled unchanged in about an hour. In humans, 73 per cent of that retained was identified in the excreted urine as monochloroacetic acid, trichloroacetic acid, and trichloroethanol (or its glucuronide) (376). The ratio of these metabolites in urine over an extended period of time was reported to be about 1:5:12. The monochloroacetic acid was excreted most rapidly, while trichloroethanol and trichloroacetic acid could be detected 14 days after a 5-hr exposure to 0.S5 mg/1 (157 ppm). Urinary excretion of metabolites was increased with simultaneous administration of glucose and insulin. Urinary levels of trichloroacetic acid or trichloroechanol have been used as indexes of exposure levels. In Czechoslovakia, Bardodej & Krivucova (331) suggested levels, 160 mg/1 for trichloroacetic acid and 320 nng/l for trichloroechanol, as the maximum urinary levels which would be attained by workers breathing trichloroethylene at an atmospheric concentration not greater than 0.4 mg/I (75 ppm). A somewhat greater percentage of a dose was converted to trichloroethanoi and less was converted to trichloroacetic acid in rabbits than in human beings (3S2). Intravenous glucose and ethanol increased the conver sion of trichloroethylene to trichloroechanol in rabbits, while sodium lactate and fructose decreased the trichloroethanol excretion somewhat (3S3). The enzyme system responsible for the oxidacion of chloral hydrate, an intermediate in trichloroethylene metabolism, to trichloroacetic acid, and the subsequent reduction to trichloroechanol, has been studied by Cooper 3: Friedman (3S4 to 337). The system was purified 30-fold from rabbit liver, chloral hydrate being the only substrate utilized of the several aldehydes tested. In the reduction step, DP\-dcpendenc alcohol dehydrogenase was found to be the principal mediator. Evidently, there is an excess of alcohol dehydrogenase in the body, since Lob (333) could find in both himself and in rabbits no difference in alcohol blood levels when it was consumed with and without trichloroethylene. 386 CHENOWETH AND HAKE Several workers have very ably pin-pointed the chemical which caused severe hypoplasia in cattle fed soybean oil meal which had been extracted with trichloroethylene. Initial studies by Seto 8c Schultze (3S9, 390, 391) indicated that the bovine was able to metabolize trichloroethylene to tri chloroacetic acid and trichloroethanol in a manner similar to other animals. They were unsuccessful in isolating the causative compound from soybean oil meal, using calves for bioassay (392). It was also found that trichloro ethylene-extracted meat scraps caused similar deleterious effects in cattle (393). In 1959, both Schultze and co-workers (394), and McKinney and co-workers (395), synthesized the addition product of trichloroethylene and cysteine, S-(dichioroviny!)-L-cysteine, and produced the same aplastic anemia in calves associated with feeding the trichloroethylene-extracted soybean oil meal. The primary mechanism of the toxic effect of ^-(dtchlorovinyl)-L-cysteine was studied by Mizuno et cl. (396). It was found chat the primary lesion was not due to an interference with D.VA synthesis in leuco cytes or leucopoiecic tissue. Chickens also succumbed co aplascic anemia when fed a diet containing 73 per cent trichloroethylene-extracted soybean oil meal (397). In addition, these chickens developed atrophy of the testes and marked depression of secondary male sexual characteristics. ^ Teiracklorottkane.--Tetrachloroethane has long been recognized as one of the most toxic of the chlorinated hydrocarbons. Workers exposed to tetra chloroethane were examined by Jeney and co-workers (39S) who report finding rather vague complaints and symptoms in a rather large percentage of workers, plus enlarged livers in over one-third. Concentrations of the chemical ranged up to O.OS mg/I (--T2 ppm) in the atmosphere. The authors exposed rats and rabbits repeatedly for 8 weeks, 50 to 70 min daily, to 100 times this concentration and obtained deleterious effects, especially in the liver. Methionine and/or choline in the diet did not confer protection. In the group of workers studied by Paparopoli & Cali (399), liver enlargement, renal impairment, and myocardial effects were noted. Although carbon tetrachloride and dichioroethane were also present in the materials handled, the authors ascribed the poisoning mainly to tetrachloroethane. Teirachloroetkylene.-- Lob (400) considered the toxic effects of tetrachloroethyiene to be little different from those of trichloroethylene. He reported detailed histories of 10 cases of alleged tecrachloroechvlene poison ing. Baba ct cl. (401), in a study of serum from patients treated with tetri chloroethylene as an anthelmintic, found that albumin was decreased and a and ^-globulins and urobilinogen were increased. These changes were ascribed to the hepatic functional disturbances caused by the anthelmintic. Stewart el al. (402) exposed volunteers to controlled atmospheres contain ing etcher 100 or 200 ppm of tecrachloroethylene for up to 3 hrs. The com pound could be detected in the blood of the subjects during exposure and was measured in the expired air for up to 100 hrs after exposure. The authors found a relationship between the concentrations of this compound in the HALOGENATE D ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBONS 3S7 R&S 136157 expired air after an exposure and the intensity of the exposure. Transient elevation of the urinary urobilinogen w3s noted in 2 of the subjects exposed to the higher concentration for 3 hrs. The authors recommend that vapor exposures of workmen to tetrachloroechylene should never exceed 200 ppm due to the onset of light-headedness and possible liver damage at higher levels. In the same paper, an accidental overexposure to approximately 395 ppm for 210 min was described. The concentration of the chemical in the expired air was followed for several weeks, and concentrations found were considerably above those reported for a timeweighted average exposure to 200 ppm for the same length of time. Again, tests for urinary urobilinogen were positive while other liver funcrion tests were negative. '' -"V 7v-7*etrafiuoroetkylene.-- Rats, rabbits, cats and mice were exposed to 0.5 to x 10 volume per cent of this compound in air for 2 hr. The deleterious effects reported were hyperemia, especially of the brain, hemorrhages, emphysema !/ and atelectases in lungs, hemorrhages in the spleen, dystrophic changes in the kidneys, desquamation of bronchial epithelium and disturbances of coordination. For rats and rabbits the lethal concentration of tetrafiuoro- ethylene in the air for 2 hr was 2.5 and 4.0 volume per cent, respectively (Zhemerdei (403)). *. / i J v' HcxachloroelhanC.--Work by Lienerc (404) showed that liver flukes were still-susceptible to"hexachforoethane given orally when the flukes were implanted subcutaneously in the rat. They concluded that the compound is present in the blood in sufficient concentration to cause death to the fluke, and therefore the efficiency of the drug is not due to its secretion in the bile. Jondorf, Parke & Williams (405) studied the metabolism of carbon-14 labeled hexachloroethane in rabbits. Tri- and dichloroethanol. che three chlorinated acetic acids, and oxalic acid were all detected in small amounts in the urine, which in three days contained 5 per cent of the radioactivity of the dose. Fourteen to 24 per cent of the dose was excreted in the expired air as carbon dioxide, tetrachloroechylene, tetrachloroechane and unchanged hexa chloroethane. There was no trichloroechylene or monochloroacecic acid detected in che expired air or urine. Halogenated three-carbon hydrocarbons.--A significant contribution to the detoxification of the n-propyl halides was made by Grenby & Young (406). n-Propylmercapturic acid was identified by paper chromatography in the urine of rats, rabbits, guinea pigs and mice which had been dosed subcuta neously with 1-bromopropane or l-iodopropane. 1-Chloropropane was simi larly metabolized by the rat and rabbit, but not by guinea pigs and mice. Synthetic n-propylmercapturic acid was converted into 5-(n-propyl)-L- cysteine by incubation with extracts of rat liver or kidney. The chronic vapor toxicity of allyl chloride (3-chloro-I-propene) to laboratory animals was studied by Torkelson et al. (407). Severe liver and kidney injury resulted when animals were exposed to S ppm (0.025 mg/1), 7 hr a day for 23 exposures. In an experiment at 3 ppm (0.009 mg/l), rats, rabbits, guinea pigs and dogs were exposed 127 to 134 times for 7 hr a day. 3SS CHENOWETK AND HAKE 5 days a week. The only deleterious effect noted which could be attributed to the chemical wa3 a reversible central lobular degeneration found in the livers of the female rats. The authors recommend that the ally! chloride concen tration in the air of the working room should be kept below 2 ppm with a timeweighted average concentration for all exposures not exceeding 1 ppm. Safety precautions for industrial handling are also given. fn a study of several longer-chain halogenated hydrocarbons. Garkavi (408) found that tetracMoropropane, after three subcutaneous injections in the rat, caused a loss of weight, an increase in liver weight and solid residue of the liver, and a decrease in glycogen content of. the liver. The action of tetracMoropropane was more similar to that of CCl< than was the action of either tetrachloropentane or tetrachloroheptane. Halogenated four-carbon hydrocarbons.-- 1-Bromobutane metabolism in the rat and rabbit was studied by Bray & James (409). fn their preliminary report, they noted that three compounds containing sulfur were excreted in the urine. One metabolite, a/ter hydrolysis, yielded glutamic acid, glycine and .S-butyl-L-cysceine, while the second yielded the latter two compounds. The third metabolite was identified as n-bucylmercapcuric acid. It appears therefore that 1-bromobutane is mecabolized by the addition of cysteine or its derivatives to butane, with the spli cting out of H Br. Chronic administration of l,3-dichloro-2-butene (Cl-CH;-CH :CCI-CHj] in the pig caused a disturbance in carbohydrate metabolism and changes in the morphological composition of the peripheral blood (Mkheyan (410)]. Mirzabekyan & Xikogosyan (411) report that 2-chloro-l.3-butadiene or chloroprene [CHj:CCI-CH :CH;] decreases the vitamin C concent in blood and urine of dogs, and also lowers this vitamin in the liver, kidney, adrenals, spleen, and heart of guinea pigs and rabbits, However, it is difficult to correlate a vitamin C deficiency with toxic manifestations of exposure of humans to chloroprene as reported by von Oectingen (169). Octafluorocyclobutane toxicity studies were reported by Clayton et cl. (412). The study was designed to demonstrate the safety of this gas in food products. Acute and repeated exposures of rats, mice, rabbits, and dogs to unusually high levels of the compou nd caused no deleterious effects of signifi cance. The studies were rather extensive and it was concluded that the com pound is a safe propellant for food products. Pattison (413) has recently published a monograph which includes toxicological data on halogenated hydrocarbon compounds in which at least one of the halogens is fluorine. R&S 136158 HALOGEN'ATEO ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBONS 389 LITERATURE CITED 1. Waters, R. M. (Ed.). Chloroform. A Study After JOO Years (Univ. of Wisconsin Press, 138 pp., 1951) 2. Duncan, C., Hindman. J. F.. and Mayberger. H. VV\, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 72, I0C4 (1956) 3. Siebecker, K. L.. and Orth, O. S., Anesthesiology, 17, 792 (1956) 4. Davison, M. H. A., Anaesthesia, 14, 127 (1959) 5. Dobkin, A. 8.. Johnston. H. J., and Skinner, L. C., Canad. Anesth. Joe. 7, 257 (1960) 6. Dobkin, A. B.. Skinner, L. C., and Johnston. H. J.. Canad. Anesth. Sot. J.. 7, 379 (1960) 7. Poe, M. F.. and Mayfield. J. R.. Anesthesiology, 21, 508 (I960) 8. Belew, J. E.. and WulrT, G. J., Obstet. Gynecol. (N. Y.), 16. 372 (1960) 9. Reichard. H., Wiqvist, N.. and Yllner, S.. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 39, 661 (I960) 10. Moya. F., iY. Y. J. Med., 61, 421 (1961) 11. Pearcy. W. C., Knott. J. R., Pittinger. C. 8., and Keaslirtg. H. H., Anes thesiology, 18, 85 (1957) 12. Gilchrist. E., and Goldsmith. M. W., Anaesthesia. 11. 23 (1956) 13. Cohen, H. P.. Cohen. M. M., Lin. S., and Baker. A. B., Anesthesiology, 19, I3S (1953) 14. Anon, J. Am. Med. Assoc., 163, 996 (1957) 15. Anon., J. Am. .1fed. Assoc., 175, 170 (1961) 16. Foster, P. A., and Todd, U. M-. Brit. J. Anaesih., 28, 507 (1956) 17. Conn, A. W,, Dyer, A. E.. and Fergu son, J. K. W.. Canad. Anaesih. Soc. J.. 2, 178 (1955) 18. Mapleson, W. U'., Brit. J. Anaesih., 29, 3 (1957) 19. Bergner, R. P.. Herd. R. M.. Kline. K., Lawrence, D.. and Hutton, C. E.. Anesthesioloty, 15, 696 (1954) 20. Atterbury. R. A,, and Borkhagen, R.. J. Oral Surg., 13. 120 (1955) 21. Boston, F. K-. Anaesthesia, 11, 37 (1956) 22. Spiro. S. R.t J. Am. Dental. Assoc., Anesthesiology, 6, 6 (1959) 23. Siegler. A. M., ,4m. J. Obstet. Gynecol.. 69, 854 (1955) 24. D'Alessnndro. G. L., and Vlattcn. R., J. Med. Soc. .Van Jersey, 54. 98 (1957) 25. Scrags*. R. D., Canad. Anaesih. Soc. J., 5. 419 (1953) 26. Cheetey, L. .V.. Anesth. Analg.. 35, 422 (1956) 27. Averbach, L. H.. HotTmeier, C. L.. Kane, S. H., Ritter. C. W., and H&naa, G. C., Obstet, j* Gynecol.. 14, 511 (1939) 23. Crankshaw, T. P.. Med. J. Aust., 1, 435 (1958) 29. Stephen. C. R.. Anesth. Analg., 33, 239 (1959) 30. Norris. \V,, and Stuart. P., Brit. Med. 1, 360 (1957) 31. Dhuner, K. G., Nordqvist, P., and Renjtrom. B.. Acta Anesth. Scand.. I, 12! (1957) 32. Rahter. P. D., Anesth. Anatg., 36, 71 (1957) 33. v. K6nig, W,, Anaeslhesist, 7, 36 (1953) 34. Tennent, A. A., West. J. Surg., 69, 63 (1961) 35. Atkinson, R. S,, Anesthesiology, 21, 67 (1960) 36. Krantz, J. C., Park, C. S., and Ling. J. S. L., Anesthesiology, 20, 635 (1959) 37. Siebecker. K. L.. Steinhaus, J. E., Bamforth. B. J., and Orth. O. S., Anesth. Analg.. 39, ISO (1960) 33. Dornette. W. H. L.. and Jones. J. P.. Anesth. Analg., 39, 249 (1960) 39. Van Poznak. A., and Artusio, J. F., Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 2, 363 (I960) 40. Van Poznak. A., and Artusio, J. F., Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 2, 374 (1960) 41. Artusio. J. F., Van Poznak, A., Hunt. R. E., Tiers, F. M., and Alexander. M.. Anesthesiology. 21, 512 (i960) 42. Wasmuth, C. E.. Greig. J. H.. Homi. J.. Moraca. P. P.. Isil, N. H.. Bitte. M.. and Hale, D. E.. Cleve land Clin. Quart., 27. 174 (I960) 43. Van Poznak. .4,, Ray, B. S., and Artusio, J. F., J. Ueurosurg., 17, 477 (I960) 44. Bamforth, B. J., Siebecker, K. L., Kraemer. R.. and Orth, O. S.. Canad. Anaesih. Soc. J. (In press) 45. Dobkin. A. B.. and Israel. J. S., L'denfriend, S. (In press) 46. Dobkin, A. B.. and Fedoruk, S., Anesthesiology, 22, 355 (196!) 47. Krantz. J. C., C3scorbi. H, F.. He!* rich, M.. Burgison, R. M,, Gold, M. I., and Rudo, F., Anesthesiology, 22, 491 (I960 43. Johnstone, M., Anesthesiology, 22, 591 (1961) R&S 136159 390 CHENWETH AND HAKE R&s 136160 49. Anon., J. .47*. Med. Assoc., 170, 1S 11 (1959) 50. Smith, R. H., and Yolpitto. p. p., Anesthesiology, 21, 1 (1960) 51. Johnstone. M., Brit. J. Anaeslh., 33, 29 (1961) 52. Schwaru, H.. .Yea1 J. Med.. 60, 250 (1960) 53. Marrett. H. R., Anaesthesia, 14, 23 (1959) 54. Guscerson, F. R.. Anaesthesia. 14, 35 (1959) 55. Robson, J. G.. Gillia. D. M., Cullen, W. G., and Grinich. H. R.. Aneslisesiology, 20, 251 (1959) 56. Romagnoli, A.. Cohen, M., and Dia mond, M. J., Conod. Anaestk. Soc. J., 7, 1S6 (1960) 57. Evans, P. H.. and flutter, C. G., Anesth. Analog. 39, 237 (i960) 58. Hampton, L. J., and Flickinger. H., Anesthesiology, 22, 413 (1961) 59. Galloon. S., Brit. J. Anaeslh., 32. 310 (1960) 60. Mushin, \V. V/., and Galloon, S., Brit. J. Anesth., 32, 324 (1960) 61. Fabian, L. W.. Box. J.. Carnes. M. A., and Smith, D. P.. Anesthesiology, 22, 459 (1961) 62. Abajian. J.. Brazeil. E. H,, Dencc. G. A., and Mil's. E. L.. /. .4m. Med. Assoc., 171, 535 (1959) 63. Carson. J. S., Harknesa, T. T., Hamp ton. L. J.. and Chase. H. F.. Ann. Surg., 149, 100 (1959) 64. Costello. M. A.. /. .4m. Assoc. Xurse Anesthetists, 28, 153 (I960) 65. Apivor, D., Anaesthesia, 15, 11 (I960) 66. Hartung, L,, and Others, d/el:. Chi'. Acta, 28, 343 (1961) 67. Gilbert, R. G. 3.. Millar, R. A., and Brindlc. G. F.. CanaJ. Anaeslh. Sac. J.. 7, 52 (I960) 63. Bayuk, A. J.. and Chen, C. C., Anesth. Analg., 40, 210 (196!) 69. Schcttini. A;, Schapira, M.. and Kepcs. E. R., Anesth. Anal'., 40, 345 (1961) 70. Deacon, \V. V*\, Anaesthesia, 15, 357 (1960) 71. Nova. R. R., Canad. Anaeslh. Soc. J., 7, 109 (I960) 72. Cutter, J. A,, and King, B. D., Setv York J. Med., 60, 503 (1960) 73. Sheridan. C. A., and Robson. J. G.. CanaJ, Anaeslh. Soc. J., 6. 365 (1959) "4. Dawson. 3., Theye. R. A., and Kirkiin. J. W., Anesth. Analog., 39. 59 (I960) 75. Bull, A. B., Ozinsky, J.. and Harri son, G. G.. Brit. J. Anaeslh., 32, 164 (1960) 76. Zauder. H. L.. Hyman. Y. K.. and Orkla. L. R., Arch. Surg., 82, 777 (1961) 77. Taylor. C., and Stocking, V. iZ,, Anesth. Analog., 40, 255 (1961) 78. Stirling. G. R., Morris, K. N".. Ortoo, R. H,, Boake. W. C.. Race, D. R.. Kinross, F.. Thomson, J. W., and Crosbv. W.. Bril. J. Anaeslh., 32, 252 (I960) 79. Norton, M. L., and Kubota, Y,, Anesthesiology, 21, 374 (I960) 30. Visser, E. R., and Tarrow, A. B., Anesth. Analg., 38, 301 (1959) 31. Brown. D., Anaesthesia, 14, 135 (1959) S2. Goldman, V., Anesth. Analog., 38, 192 (1959) 33. Duncan. W. A. M.. and Raventos, J.. Brit. J. Anaestk., 31, 302 (1959) S4. D'Arcy, E. J.. Holrndahl, M. H., and Payne. J. P., Brit. J. Anaeslh., 31, 424 (1959) 85. Marshall. F. N\. Pittinger, C. B., and Lang, J. P., Anesthesiology, 22, 363 (1961) 36. Gibson, J. A., Canad. A naesth. Soc. J., 6, 14S (1959) 3". Haley, F. C., and Wyant, G. M., Csnad. Anaeslh, Soc. J., 6, 271 (1959) 83. Vourc'h. G.. Schnoebelen. E.. Buck. F.. and Fruhliag, L.. Anesth. Analg. (Par). 17, 466 (I960) 39. Blackmore. W. P., Erwin. K. W., Wiegar.d. O. F.. and Lipsey, R.. Anesthesiology. 21, 4S9 (1960) 90. Dobkin, A. B.. Anesthesiology, 20, 10 (1959) 91. Hoimdahl. M. H., and Payne, J. P., Arm Anaeslh. Seand., 4, 173 (1961) 92. Nunn. J. F., and Matthews. R. L.. B'it. J. Anaeslh., 31, 330 (1959) 93. Baxter. V. T,, Bril. J. Anaestk., 32, 171 (I960) 94. Johnstone, M.. and Nisbet. H. I. A., B'it. J. Anaeslh., 33, 9 (1961) 95. Mutr. B. J., Hall. L. \V,, and Littlewort. M. C. G., Brit. J. Anaeslh., 3i. 433 (1959) 96. Bloodwell. R. D.^Brown, C.. Christen son. G. R., Goldberg. L. I., and Morrow, A. G., Anesth. Analg., 40, 352 (1961) 97. Slack. G. W.. Liade. H. W.. Dripps, R. D., 3nd Price. H. L.. Brit. J. Anaestk., 31, 23S (1959) 9S. Cutler.. S. C.. Ada Anaestk. 5cand., 3, Supplement II, 67 (1959) 99, Beatoa. A. C., CanaJ. Anaeslh. Soc. J.. 6, IS (1959) HALOGENATED ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBONS 391 R&S 136161 ICO. Dundee, J. \V,, and Black. G. \V., Anaesthesia, 15, 349 (I960) 101. Mureagh, G. P., Anaesthesia, 15, 235 (1960) 102. Smith, D. P., Fabian, L. \V,, and Carnes, M. A., Aneslh. Analg., 40, 137 (1961) 103. Millar, R. A., and Morris, M. E., Canad. Anaesth. Soc. J., 7, 423 ` (1960) 104. Keating, V. J.. Patrick, S. J., and Aonamunthodo, H,, Anaesthesia, 14, 268 (1959) 105. Enderbv, G. E. H.. Anaesthesia, 15, 25 <t960) 106. Burn, J. H., and Epstein, H. G.. Brit. J. Anaesth.. 31, 199 (1959) 107. Moyers, J., and Pitcinger. C. B., Anesthesiology, 20, 605 (1959) 103. Payne, J. P., Gardiner. D.. and Verner, I. R., Bril. J. Anaesth., 31, 87 (1959) 109. Bamforth, B. J.. Siebecker, K. L., Steinhaus. J. E., and Orth. O. S., Anesthesiology, 21, 273 (I960) 110. Dobkin, A. B.. Harland. J. H., and Fedortik, S-, Brit. J. Anaesth., 33, 239 (1961) 111. Dobkin, A. B., Harland. J. H., and Fedoruk. S., Anesthesiology. In Press 112. Dixon, G. D,, and Matheson, D. I.. Canad. Med. Assoc. J.. 79, 365 (1959) 113. Long. J. P., Pittinger. C. B., and Hamilton. W. K., Anestk. Analg., 37. 355 (1953) 114. Nayler, \V., Australian J. Exptl. Biol. Med. Sci., 37, 279 (1959) 113. Smith. H., Anaesthesia, 15, 245 (1960) 116. Boniface, K. J., Brown. J. M,, and Kronen. P. S.. J. Pharmacol. Exptl. Therap., 113, 64 (1955) 117. Little. D. M,, Barbour, C. M.. and Given, J. B.. Burg. Cvnec. Obstct., 107, 712 (1953) 117A. Robertson, J. D.. Swan. A. A. B.. and Whitteridge, D.. J. Physiol.. 131, 463 (1956) 11 7B. Robertson. J. D.. and Swan. A. A. B.. Quart. J. Exptl. Physiol., 42, 11J (1957) 113. Jones. W. M.. Margolts, G-. and Stephen, C. R., Anesthesiology, 19. 715 (1953) 119. Green, H. D., N'gai. S. H,. Sulak, M. H., Crow, J. B.. and Slocum. H. C., Anesthesiology, 20, 776 (1959) 120. Richards, C. C., and Bachman. L.. Aneslh. Analg., 34, 207 (1955) 121. Virtue. R. \V,, Payne, K. W., Carrann, L. J., Gordon, G. S., and Rember, R. R., Anesthesiology, 19, 473 (1953) 122. Chenoweth. M. B., Robertson. D. N,, Erley, D. S., and Gohlke, R., Anes thesiology, In Press 1 23. Stewart, C. P., and Stolman. A., Toxi cology--Mechanisms and Analytical Methods 1, 32-48 (Academic Press, Inc.. New York, 774 pp., I960) 124. Hattori, K., Nippon Yakurigaku Zasshi. S3, 136 (1957) (Through Chem. Abstr., 52, 13984*) 125. Dundee, J. \V,, and Dripps, R. D., Anesthesiology, 18, 232 (1957) 126. Hunter, A. R., Brit. J. Anaesth., 31, 490 (1959) 127. Chatterjee. M. L., Seth, D., and Ghosh, M. N.. Bull. Calcutta School Trap. Mid., 7, 107 (1959) 123. Sabawala. P. B., and Dillon, J. B., Anesthesiology. 19, 337 (1953) 129. U.'atland, D. C., Long, J. P.. Pvttinger. C. B., and Cullen, S. C., Anesthesiology, 18, S33 (1957) 130. Davis. H. S., Dillon, W. H.. Collins. \V. F.. and Randt, C. T., Anesthesi ology. 19, 441 (1953) 131. Davis. S.. Quitmeyer. E., and Collins, W, F., Anaesthesia, 16. 32 (1961) 132. Domino. E. F.. and L'eki. S.. J. Phar macol. Exptl. Therap., 127, 23S (1959) 133. Dobkin. A. B., and Purkin, N\. Canad. Anaesth. Soc. J.. 6, 243 (1959) 134. Dobkin, A. B., Donaldson. H.. and Purkin. N\, Canad. Anaesth, Soc. J., 6, 251 (1959) 1J5. Summers, F. \V., and Adriani, J.. Anesthesiology. 22, 100 (1961) 136. Butler. R. A., and Hill, D. \V., Nature. 189, 4SS (1961) 137. Artusio. J. F., and Van Poznak, A., Fed. Pros.. 20 (l), 312 (1961) 133. Van Poznak, A., and Artusio. J. F., Fed. Proc., 20 (1). 312 (1961) 139. Pauling, L., Science. 134, 15 (1961) 140. Burns. T. H. S., Hall. J. M.. Bracken. A.. Gouldstone. G.. and N'ewland, D. S.. Anaesthesia. 16, 3 (1961) 141. Vandam. L. D., and Dripps, R. D., A nesthesiology, 16, 43 (1955) 142. Bucn, J. H., Epstein. H. G., and Goodford. P. J., Brit. J. Anaesthesia. 31, 513 (1959) 143. Glover, J. H., and Hodgson, H. W., Anaesthesia, 16, 19 (1961) 144. Fabian. L. \V., Dewitt. H.. and Carries, M. A., Aneslh. Analg., 39, 456 (1960) 145. Cole. W. H. J., Anaesthesia, 11, 156 (1956) 146. Burgison, R. M., O'Malley. W. E., 392 CHENOWETH AND HAKE HeUae, C. K.. Forrest. J. W,, and Krantz, J. C., J. Pharmacol. ExptL Therap., 114, 4*0 (1935) 147.Krantz, J. C., Ling, J. S. L., and Koz- ler, V. F., J. Pharmacol. Espll. Therap.. 130, 492 (1960) 143. Sadove, M. S., Balagot, R, C., and Linde, H. W., Anesthesiology, 17, 591 (1956) 149. Gainza, E., Heaton, C. E.. Willcox, M., and Virtue. R. W,, Brit. J. Anaesth., 28, 411 (1956) 150. Dundee, J. \V,, Linde, H. W., and Dripps, R. D., Anesthesiology, IS, 66 (1957) 151. Brechner, V. L., and Dorneue. W. H. L., Anesthesiology, 13, 321 (1937) 152. Musscr, R. D.. Park. C. S.. and Krantz, J. C., Anesthesiology, IS, 4S0 (1957) 153. Slater, H. M., Canad. Anaesth. Soc. J.. 4, 5 (1957) 154. Bourne, J. G., and Morton, H. J. V'., Lancet. I, 20 (1935) 156. Krantz, J. C.. Esquibel, A- Truitt. E. B., Ling. A. S. C., and Kurland. A. A., J. .4m. Med. Assoc., 166, 1555 (1956) 157. Boivin, P. A.. Hudon, F.. and Jacques. A,, Canad. Anaesth. Soc. J., 5, 409 (1953) 153. Hudon, F.. Jacques, A., and Boivin. P. A., CanaJ. Anaesth. Soc. J.. 5, 403 (1953) 159. Brown, G. K., CanaJ. Anaesth. Soc. J 7, 297 (I960) 160. Hall, K. D.. Norris, F., and Downs, S., Anesthesioloty, 21, 522 (I960) 161. Ravent6a, J., and Dee. J., Brit. J. Anaesth.. 31. 46 (1959) 162. Johnstone, M., Evans. V,, and Mur phy, P. V"., CanaJ. Anaesth. Soc. J., 8, 53 (1961) 163. Dobkin, A. 3.. Drummond, K.. and Purkin, N., Brit. J. Anaesth.. 31, 53 (1959) 164. Dobkin, A. B., Harland, J. M.. and Fedoruk, S., Anesthesiology, 21, 13 (I960) 165. Wyant, G. M., Merrimn, J. E., Har land, J. H., and Donaldson, H. V., Canad. Anaesth. Soc. J., 7, 91 (1960) 166. Dechene, J. P-, and Claude. H.. Canad. Anaesth. Soc. J., 7, 100 0960) 167. PatLy, F., (Ed.), Industrial Hytiene and Toxicology Vol. 2, (lnterscier.ee Publ. Inc., New York. In Press) 168. Browning, E., Ann. Rev. Pharmacol.. 1, 397 (1961) 169. von Oetcingen. W. F., 7Vre Halolenated Hydrocarbons, Toxicity and Potential Dangers. (U. S. Govt. Printing OfEce, Washington, D.C., 430 pp. 1955) 170. Noro, L., and Pectersson, T.. .Vord. Med., 64, 3S1 (1960) 171. Bongard, E. M., and Ivanova, A. G., Materialy po Voprosam Cigieny TruJa i Klin. Professional. Boltznei, Gorki, Sbornik, 5, 145 (1956) (Chem, Abslr., 54, 154J5\ i960) 172. Roche, L.t Nicholas, A., and Marin, A., Arch. Mai. Prof., 17, 430 (1956) {Bull. Hyg., 32, 161, 1957) 173. Klimkovd-Deutschovd, E.. Rev. Czech. Med., 3. I (1957) {Bull, Hyg., 33, 143, 1958) 174. Redrord-Ellis, R., and Gowenlock, A. H., To be Published 175. Rathus, E. M., and Landv, P. J.. Brit. J. Indust. Med.. 18, 55 (1961) 176. Martorano, G.. Med. Lavoro, 47, 524 (1956) {Bull. Hyg.. 32. 261, 1957) 177. Roche. L., Normand. J.. and Genevoia. M,. Arch. Mat. Prof., 17, 594 (1956) {Bull. Hyg., 32, 590, 1957) 1*3. Torkelson, T. R.. Oyen, F.. and Rowe, V. K.. .4m. Indust. Hyg. Assoe. J., 21, 275 (1960) 179. Allen, H,, Fluid Handling, 132, 5 (1961) ISO. Gericsen. \V. B.. and Buschmann, C. H.. Brit. J. Indust. Med., 17, 137 (I960) 131. Ulanova, I. P.. and Yanovjkaya, B. I., Biul. Eksper. Biol. Med., 43. 846 (1959) {Biol. Abstr., 35, 41484. 1940)* 132. Quevauvilter. A.. Parfums, cosmil.. savons, 3, 223 (1960) {Chem. Abstr., 54, 19965*. 1960) 1SJ. Guillerne. R.. Badre. R., Bertharion, G., and Vignon. B.. Ann. Pharm. Franc., 13, 542 (1960) 134. Brauer, R. W., Leong, G. F., and Hol loway, R. J., 4m. J. Physiol., 200, 543 (1961) 1S5. Opie, E. L.. J. Expil. Med., 104, S97 (1956) 186. Amasio, C., Vitaminologia (Turin), 16, 57 (1953) {Chem. Abstr.. 54. 5953', 1960) 187. Gilndisch, M.. and Feszt. T., Morfol. norm, si fatal. {Bucharest), 5, 149 (I960) {Chem. Abstr., 55, 5753*. 1961) 133. Cullit'ord. D., and Hewitt. H. B., J. Endocrinol., 14, 381 (1957) 189. Hewitt, H. B.. J. Endocrinol.. 14, 394 (1957) 190. Gaultier, M., Fournier, E., Gervais. R&S 136162 HALOGENATED ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBON'S 393 P,. and Basquin, M., Sem. hop. Paris, 36, 3159 (I960) 191. Cballen, P. J., Hickish, D. E-. and Bedford, J., Brit. J. Indust. Med., 15, 243 (1953) 192. DLMaggio. G-, Arch. sci. biol. (Bolotna), 42, 31 (1958) (Chem. Abstr., 53, 1165lf, 1959) 193. Maresovi. Z., Mach. O.. Friedberger. V., and Fassati, P., Casopis lekafii leskych, 96, 179 (1957) (Chem. Abslr., SI. 107681, 1957) 194. Lewis, C. E-. J. Occup. Med., 3, 32 (1961) 195. Lachnit, V., and Pietschmann. H., Arch. Ceverbepathol. Geixerbehyt., IS, 337 (1960) 196. Finzel, M., Zentr. Arbeitsmed. Arbeit schuts., 10, 235 (1960) 197. JCazantzis, G,, and Bomtord. R. R., Lancet, I, 360 (I960) 19S. Guild. \V. R., Young. J. V,, and Mer rill. J. P., .4 km. Intern. Med. 48, 1221 (1958) 199. Shield. D. O., Med. J. Australia. 2, 729 (1958) 200. Widmann, H., Deutsch Med. IVochsehr., 83, 1611 (1958) 201. Craven. R. E., .1lorquette MeJ. Re?.. 25, 84 (I960) 202. Seidelin, R,, Thorax, 16, 91 (1961) 103. Stewart, R. D., Torkelson. T. R., Hake, C. L., and Erley, D. S.. J. Lab. Clin. Med., 56, US (1960) 204. Stewart, R. D., Gay. H. H., Erley, D. S., Hake, C. L,, and Peterson, J. E., J. Occup. Med., In Press 205. Kobayashi, M.. Med. J. Shinshu Unit., 4, 163 (1959) (Biol. Abstr., 35. 18192, 1940) 206. Asagoe, T., .Voika Hokan, 7, 504 (1960) (Chem. Abstr., 55, 7624*. 1961) 207. Mascitelli-Coriandoli. E., and Boldrini. R-, Arch. "E. Marailiano" patol. e. din., 14, 45 (1958) (Chem. Abstr., 52, 12135V 1953) 208. Vaisler, L., and Costiner, E., Acad. refi. populare Romine, Inst, mdoerinol. "C- I Parhon" Sludii cercetiri endocrinol., 11, 2S3 (I960) (Chem. Abstr., 55. 3816*. 196t) 209. Leduc, E. H., and Wilson, J. W., Arch. Pathol., 65, 147 (1958) 210. Boni, P., Reduzzi. F., Bile, G., and Gallcro, V,, Clin. Ter.. 9, 129 (1955) (Chem. Abstr., 51, 3045V 1957) 211. Mainoli, S., and Piccinell, O.. Arch. "E. Marailianopatol. c din., 12, 1001 (19S6) (Chem. Abstr.. 51. 9939*. 1957) 212. Romano. P. M., Biggi, S.. and Caci* oppo. A., Arch. ". Marailiano" patol. t din.. 15. 95 (1959) (Chem. Abstr., 54, 5947`, t960) 213. Paterni, L.. Germini, P.. and Garasaini. G.. Folia Med. (Xaples), 40, 665 (1957) (Chem. Abslr. 52. 5741, 1958) 214. Asagoe. T., Xaika Hokan, 7, 507 (1960) (Chem. Abstr.. 55. 7624f, 1961) 215. Gallagher, C. H., and Simmonds. R. A., .Va/are, 134, 1407 (1959) 216. Gallagher, C. H., Australian J. Exptl. Biol. Med. Sci., 38, 25 (1960) 217. Fiore-Donati. L., Chiecho-Biancht. L., and Bcrtaccini, G.. Arch, intern, pharmacodynamic, 123, 115 (1959) (Chem. Abslr. 54, 15676*, 1960) 213. Fiore-Donati, L., and Chieco-Bianchi, L., Lab. Inrest., 9, 625 (1960) 219. Kasbekar, D, 1C., Rege. D. V., and Sreenivasan, A., Xature, 178, 9S9 (1956) 220. ICasbekar. D. K., Lavate, W, V.. Rege. D. V.. and Sreenivasan. A.. Biochem. J., 72, 3S4 (1959) 221. Vaisler, L., Biener, J., and Costiner, E., Acad. rep. populare Romine, Inst, biocr.im Sludii ccrceliri bioehim,, 3, 231 (1960) (Chem. Abstr., 55, 9595'. 1961) 222. Vaisler, L.. Lungu, At.. Costiner, E.. Acad. rep. populare Romine. Inst, endocrinol. "Prof C. I. Parhon," Sludii cercetari endocrinol., 11, 304 (1960) (Chem. Abstr., 55, 7653s, 1961) 223. Mileu, S. M.. Vaisler, L,, Antonescu, .V., and Costiner. E., Communs. acaJ. rep, populare Romine, 10, 249 (1960) (Chem. Abstr., 55. 13371, I960 224. Petrovskava, O. G.. Fiziol. Zhur., A had. .Vaitk Ukr. R. S. R.. 4. 322 (1959) (Chem. Abslr., 54, 17702s, 1960)* 225. Tamara. L'.. Tsuchiya. T.. Harada, T., Kuroiwa. H.. and Kitani, T., Med, J. Osaka L'niv., 10. 91 (1959) (Chem. Abstr., 53, 205631. 1959) 226. Miyoshi. A., Saiko Hikan, 7, 790 (1960) (Chem. Abslr., 55, 6697V 1961) 227. Asagoe. T., Xaika HiSkan. 7, 304 (I960) (Chem. Abstr., 5S, 7624*, 1961) 223. Laudahn. G-, and Lilders. C. Arch. Pathol., 329, 531 (1957) 229. Laudahn. G.. and Lilders. C. J.. .4 rzneimiUd-Forsch., 10, 731 (1960) 230. Laudahn, G-, and Lilders, C. J., Arz- R&S 136163 394 CHEN'OWETH AND HAKE ntimitUl-Forsth., 10, 973 (I960) 231. Tanyol, H., and Friedman. M. H. F.. Proe. Soc. Exptl. Blot. Mid., 10(5, 643 (1961) 232. Szreder, W,, Czaruecki, W.. and Ro>ski, S.. Acta Polon. Pharm.. 13, 223 (1936) (Chem. Abstr., 51, 3230*, 1937) 233. Kobayshi, T.. Yaku{aku Zasshi, 80, 1612 (1960) {Chent. Absir.. S5. 8649*, 1961) 234. Tomioaca, F., Seaba. H., and Hiwaki. C., Naiasaki Itakki Zassi, 33, 330 (1953) 235. Fedorov, I. I.. Xeigauz. E. L.. and Vavrinyuk. S. S., Fitiol. Mtkanismy, Kompensalom. Rtaklsil Vosstan* viiel. Protessesos, L'vov, Sbornik. 2, 25 (1958) (.Chem. Abstr., 55, 4779*. 1961)* 236. Fiume, L.t and Favilli, C.. .Vature, 189, *1 (1961) 237. Molander, D. W., Wroblewski, F., and LaDue, J. S., J. Lab. Ciin. Mid.. 46, 331 (1955) 238. Block, \V. D., and Cornish, H. H.. Proe. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med.. 97, 178 (1933) 239. Cornish, H, H., and Block. \V. D.. Area. Indust. Health, 21, 549 (19r,0) 240. Cornish, 14. H., and Block. *V. D., Arek. Environ. Health, 1, 96 (I960) 241. Frank!. H. D.. Gaertner, P. L., Kos suth, L. C.. and Milch. L. J.. Texas Repts. Btol. and Med., 15, 863 (1957) 242. Lector, E.. Berlin u. Munch, tierdrztl. Wochschr., 73, 25 (I960) (Chem. Abstr., 55. ?6l7h. 1951) 243. Wirtschatcer, Z. T., and Tsujinsura, J. K.. Arch. Environ. Health, 2, 16 (1961) 244. Hruzik, H.. and Langer, J.. Braiislva. Uhirske listv. 40, 543 (I960) (Chem. Abstr.. 55, 5731*. I960 245. Fleisher, G. A.. Wakim, K. G.. Han son, M. L.. Axelson, J., and Arns, R.. Proe. Stajf Meetings Mayo Clinic, 31, 640 (1956) 246. Dt Simone. A., Peiato (Rome), 5, 66 (1959) (Chem. Abstr., 55.2392*. 1961) 247. Fleisher, G. A., and Wakim. K. G., Proe, Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med., 106, 23J (I960 243. Reichard, H.. J. Lab. Clin. Med., S3, 417 (1959) 249. Villela, G. G., and Mkidieri, E., Rev. brasil. biol., 15, 235 (1955) (Chem. Abstr., 50, 1 199* 1956) 250. Giusti. G., and Coltorti. M-, <Bbenif*t. Appl., 4, 1S9 (1957) (Chem. Absir., 52, 4359', 1953) 251. Konishi, H.. Okayama Itakkai Zasshi, 71, 1379 (1959) (Chem. Abstr.. 53, 2244S*, 1959) 252. Villela, G. G,, Nature. 190, 307 (I960 253. Ogawa. M.. Aeta Schol. Med. Unit. Kioto, 35, 229 (195S) (Chem. Abstr.. S3, 13400*, 1959) 254. Basilio, C., Prajoux. V., and Cabello. J., Acta Physiol. Lat.-am., 10, 159 (I960) 255. Klinger, W., and Kersten. L., .4cl*i Biol. Sled. Germ., S, 364 (1960) 256. Eger, \V,, and Kurth, U., Aeta Histochem., 6, S (1953) (Chem. Absir., 53, 10513*. 1959) 257. Dric, F.. Gregora. Z., Lojda, Z., and Gregora. V., eshoslov. Castroent. Vyi. 14. 436 (1960) (Chem. Abstr., 55. 3308*. I960 253. Mvren, J.. Aeta Pathol. .Microbiol. 'Scond., SO, 12 (1960) 259. Heim, F., Leuschner, F., and On, A.. Arch, exptl. Pathol. Pkarmakol., 229, 360 (1956) (Chem. Abstr., 51, 1339r, 1957) 260. Pelocchir.o, A. M., Arch. set. med.. 102, 438 (1956] (Chem. Absir., SI, 6364'. 1957) 261. Moriya. S., Yonaio I:aku Zasshi, 10, 555 (1959) (Chem. Abstr., 54, 3723', 1960) 262. Ball. W. L., and Kay, K.. Arch. lndustr. Health, 14, 450 (1956) 263. Reismann, K. R., Christianson. J, F., Bolev. j. O., and Lictle, C. F., Sur~ iery, 37, 733 (1955) 264. Mazur, A.. Green. S., Saha. A., and Carleton. A., J. Clin. Invest.. 37, 1309 (1953) 265. Larson, E. ]., and Morrill, C. C.. ,4m. J. Vet. Research, 21, 949 (i960) 266. Yamamoto, R. S., Okuda, K.. and Chow, B. F.. Proe. Soe. Exptl. Biol. Med., 94, 497 (1957) 267. Okuda, K.. Bull. Vamaiuchi Med. School, 4, 109 (1957) (Chem. Abstr., 53, 13104*. 1953) 26S. Kaco, .V. and Murakami. S.. J. I'sfczminoi, S, 217 (1959) (Chem. Abstr.. 53, 20479', 1959) 269. Knauif. H. G.. and Windsheimer. F., MrtfJi, exptl. Pathol. Pharmakol., 239, 442 (I960) 270. Myren. J.. and Gye J., .4rla Pathol. Microbiol. Scond.. 43, 201 (I960) (Chem, Abstr.. 54, 21439*. I960) 271. Grand. A.. Scavo, D.. and De Maria. B.. Folia Sled. (Naples), 31, 154 (1953) (Chem. Abstr., 52, 12156'. 1953) 272. Krilza, Z., and Smetana. R., Physiol. R&S 136164 HALOGE.N'ATED ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBON'S 395 r &S 136165 Bohemoslovert, 6, 53-3 (1957) (Chem, A5jfr., 52, 13932*. 1953) 273. Mizonuroa, H., Nippon Shonika Cakukai Zajshi, 62, 233 (1955) (Chem. Abstr., 52, 14869*. 1958) 274. Lin. M. H., Osaka Shiritru Daigaku Itaku Zasshi, 9, 4333 (1960) (Chem, Abstr., 55, I0677h, 1961) 275. Christie, C. S., and Judah, J. D., Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Sec: 3., 142, 241 (1956) 276. Frunder, H., BOrnig. H.. Richter. C-, and Stade, EC.. Z. physiol. Chem., 307, 161 (1957) 277. Bdroig, H., Stade, K., Frunder, H., and Richter. G., Z. physiol. Chem., 310, 232 (195S) 27S. Richter, G-. Frunder. H.. and Bdmig, H,, Z. physiol, Chem., 310, 249 (195S) 279. Bdmig, H.. Richter, G.. and Frunder. H., Z. physiol. Chem., 322, 213 (I960) 280. Thielmann. EC., ECraul. M.. Blume, E., and Frunder, H., Z. physiol. Chem., 322, 231 (1956) 231. Frunder, H., Fischer, \V., and Bdrnig. H.. Z. physiol. Chem., 306, 112 (1956) 232. Judah, J. D,, and Rees, EC. R., Fed. Proc., IB, 1013 (1959) 233. Calvert, D. N., and Brody, T. M., J. Pharmacol. Exptl. Thcrap., 124, 273 (1953) 234. Calvert, D. N., and Brody, T. M,, Am. J. Physiol., 198, 669 (I960) 235. Moore, K. E., and Brody, T. M., ,4m. J. Physiol., 198, 677 (I960) 2S6. Brody. T. M,, and Calvert. D. N\, Am. J. Physiol., 198, 682 (1960) 237. Brody, T. M.f Calvert. D. N'.. and Schneider, A. F., J. Pharmacol. Exptl. Therap., 131. 341 (1961) 233. Schotz, M. C., and Recknagel. R. O., Proc. Soe. Exptl. Biol. Sled., 103, 398 (1960) 239, Agostini, C., Perin, A., and Fonnesu, A., Brit. J. Exptl. Pathol., 41, 617 (I960) 290. Share, L.. and Recknagel, R. O.. .4m. J. Pksyiol., 197, 121 (1959) 291. Recknagel. R. O., and Anthony, D. D., J. Biol. Chem.. 234, 1052 (1959) 292. Recknagel, R. O., and Litteria, M., Am. J. Pathol., 36. 521 (I960) 293. Schotz. M. C., and Recknagel, R. O., Biachim. Biophys. Ada, 41, lot (1960) 294. Recicnagel, R. O-. Fed. Proc., 19, 137 (1960) 295. Recicnagel, R. O., Lombardi, B., and Schota. M. C., Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med., 104. 603 (1960) 296. Recicnagel, R. O.. and Lombardi, B., J. Biol. Chem., 236, 564 (1961) 297. Rossi. F.. and Zatti, M.. Experieniia, 16, 513 (I960) 293. Rees. K. R.. and Sinha. EC. P., J. Pathol. Bacterial., SO, 297 (I960) 299. Gallagher, C. H.. and Rees, EC. R., Nature, 187, 143 (I960) 300. Rees, K. R., Sinha, EC. P., and Spector, W. G., J. Pathol. Bacterial.. 81, 107 (1961) 301. Rees, K. R., and Spector. W. G., Nature, 190. 321 (1961) 302. Gallagher, C. H., Nature, 187, 162 (1960) 303. Thiers. R. ., Reynolds, E. S., and Vallee, B. L.. J. Biol. Chem., 233, 2130 (I960) 304. Plaa. G. L., and Hine. C. H.. Arch. Indust. Health, 21, 114 (I960) 305. Bicner, J., Acad. rep. populate Romine. Inst, endocrinol. "C. /. Portion," Studii eercelari endocrinol., 9, 443 (1953) {Chem. Abstr., 53. 1917S\ 1959) 306. Isselbacher, K. J., and McCarthy, E. A., Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med., 103, 319 (I960) 307. Chojecki, Z., and Kem. F., Gastro enterology, 40, 521 (1961) 30S. Islami, A. H., Pack, G. T., and Hub bard. J. C., J. Lab. Clin. Med.. 53. 536 (1939) 309. Post. J., Klein. A., and HotTman, J., Aren. Pathol., 70, 314 (I960) 310. Hankiss. J.. Experientia, 13. 19S (1957) 311. Leevy, C. M., Hollister, R. M., Schmid. R., MacDonald. R. A., and Davidson, C. S., Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biot. Med.. 102, 672 (1959) 312. Peczold, H., Acta Biol. Sled. Germ., 2, 7 (1959) {Chem. Abstr., 54, 9115*. 1960) 313. Hebert, S., Roux. J. M., and Demay, A., Ann, hislockim., 2, 131 (1957) (Chem. Abstr., 52, 13975*. 1953.) 314. Basai, M., Exp. Cell. Res,, 20, 313 (1960) 315. Myren, J,, Acta Pathol. Mierobiol. Scand., Suppl., 116, 1 (1956) 316. Decsi, L., Mehes. J.. and Varga. F., ArcA, exptl. Pathol. Pharmakol., 231, 235 (1957) (Chem. Abstr,, 52, 14*4', 1953) 317. Fricde. R., J. Pathol. Bacterial., 79, 109 (1960) 313. Zugrlvescu, I., Constatinescu, C., Motoc. F-, and Constatincscu, S.. Acad. rep. populate Romine, /net. 396 CHENOWETH AND HAKE R&S 136166 med, interna, Studii cereetJri med. interna, I, 65 (I960) (Chem. Abstr., 55, 3817, 1961) 319. Schulze. G., Z. get. txpll. lied., 133, 194 (1960) (Chem. Abstr., 54, 21360, 1960) 320. Eagelhart, H.. Thaler, H., and Wen ger. R., 2. ref. apU. Med., 131, 323 (1959) (Chem. Abstr., 54, 21360', 1960) 321. KSnig, E.. Lohmeyer, D., and Dahme, E., Z. its. exptl. Med., 133. 442 (1960) (Chem. Abstr., 53, 4753s, 1960) 322. Grasai, 8., Cagianetli, M. A., and Spremoda, G., Minerva nefrol., 1959. 31 (1959) (Chem. Absir., 54, I9952r. I960) 323. Loyke, H. F\, Plucinsky, J. J., and Crawford, T. L., Circulation Res., 8, 535 (1960) 324. Kaltenbach. A., IViener Tierarsll. Monatsschr., 46, 329 (1959) (Chem. Abstr., 53, 20572*. 1959) 325. Wirtschafter. Z. T., and DeMeritl. M. G., Arch. Pathol., 67, 146 (1959) 326. Piccinelli. O.. Farmaco, Ed. sci., 11, 823 (1956) (Chem. Abstr.. 53, 19165\ 1959) 327. Fisher. E. R., and Fisher, B., Cancer, 13, 860 (I960) 32S. Della Porta, G., Terracini, B.. and Shubik, P., J. Xatl. Cancer Inst., 26. 855 (1961) 329. Malconc. C., and Prodi, G.. Acta Un. Ini. Cancr,, 15, 191 (1959) (Chem. Abstr.. 53, 22433'. 1959) 330. Korpassy, 8., DAvid, M. A., Jakobovits. A., and Kovacs, K., Aeta Un. Ini. Cancr., 15, 173 (1959) (Chem. Abstr., 53, 22433*, 1959) 331. Kenig, E. E.t lev. Akad. Xauk Turkem. S.S.R., 1956 (4), 38 (1956) (Biot. Abstr., 35. ISSl I) 332. Mastromatteo. E., Fisher, A. M., Christie, H., and Danziger, H., Am. Indust. Hyg. Assoc. J.. 5, 395 (1960) 333. Danziger, H,, Canad. Med. Assoc. J., 82, 823 (1960) 334. Torlcelson, T. R-. Oyen, F., and Rowe, V. K., Am. Indust. Hyg. Assoc. J., In Press 335. Loscalzo, B., Bianchi, A., and Robertaccio, A., Lavoro t/mano, 11, 554 (1959) 336. Slyusar, M. P.. Voprosy Gigteny Truda i Professional. Zabolevanii v Gomorudu., Kkim. i. Mashinos- troitel. Pram., Sbornik, 92, (1958) (Chem. Abstr.. 53, 5506*. 1959)* 337. DanishevskiT. S. L., Tr. Leningrad Sanitamogit Med. Inst., 44, 155 (1953) (Chem. Abstr., S3, 5505*. 1959)* 333.Malir.skaya. X. N\, and Yanovskaya. B. I., Biull. Eltsp. Biol. Med., 44. 74 (1957) (Chem. Abstr,, S2, 746-1*, 1953)* 339. AbduJla-Zade. G. A., Sbomik Trudov Azerbatdsan. Med. Inst. 1953, 309, (Chem. Abstr., 54, 17703*, I960)* 340. Weisa, F., Arch. f. Geverbepath. u. Geu-erbehyg., 15, 253 (1957) 341. Menschick. H.. .4rc8. Grxerbepath. Gevrerbehyg., 15, 241 (1957) 342. Morozov, G. N.. Formokol. Toksihol., 21, 76 (1953) (Chem. Abstr., 52, 13116s, 1958)* 343. Guarino, A., and Lioia, X., Folia Med. (XapUs), 41, 676 (1958) (Chem. Abstr., 53, 576*. 1959) 344. Borisova. M. K-, Gig, Sanii., 22, 13 (1957) (Chem. Abstr., 51. 12JS4', 1957) 345. Olmstead. E. V.. Arch. Indust. Health, 21, 525 (1960) 346. Olomucki, .. Xature, 130, 1353 (1957) 347. Torketson. T. R., Oyen, F., McCollis- ter, D. D., and Rowe, V. K-. Am. Indust. H\g. Assoc. J., 19, 353 (1958) 34S. Stewart. R. D.. Gay. H. H.. Erley, D. S., Hake. C. L.. and Peterson, J. E., Am. Indust. Hyg, Assoc. J,, In Press 349. Hake, C. L., Waggoner, T, B.. Rob ertson, D. X.. and Rowe, V. K.. Arch. Environ. Health, 1, 101 (1960) 350. Grtsler, R.. and Gallina, R., Med. Lavoro, 47, 240 (1956) (Also Arch. Indust. Health, 14, 573 (1956)) 351. Bardodej, 2., and Vyskocil, J., Arch. Indust. Health, 13, 531 (1956) 352. Williams, J, H\, J. Occup. Med., 1, 549 (1959) 353. Edson, E. F.. U. K. .41. Energy ,4thority Ind. Group 5006/25, 9 pp. (1959) (Chem. Abstr., 54, SPSS'1, 1960) 354. Haas. P. A. (Industriehygienische Untersuchungen ilber das Trichloroaethylen in der metallverarbeitenden Industrie. Thesis t52 pp. Zurich I960.) (Bull Hyg.. 35. 1092. I960) 355. Baker, A. B.. J. Xeuropathol. Exptl. Xeurot., 17. 649 (1953) 356. Khorvat. M,, and Formanek. la.. Zhur. Vyss. Xerv. Deia. Pavlov (Engl. Ed.) 9, 329 (1959)* 357. Grandjean. E.. Environ. Health, 1, 106 (I960) 358. Michalova. C-. and Hanusova. V*., das. Uk. desk., 95, 1167 (1956) HALOGENATED ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBONS 397 R&S 136167 (Chem, Abstr., 51, 10765.* 1957) 559. Hictish, D. E., Smith, J. H., and Bed ford. J.. Brit. J. Indust. Med., 15, 290 (1956) 560. Mazza, V., and Cascini, F.. Folia Med. (Naples), 59, 979 (1956) Ckem. Abstr., 51, 6043\ 1957) 561. Rubino, G. F.. Scansetti, G., Trompeo. G.. and Gaido, P. C., Med. Lavoro, 50. 735 (1959) (Bull. Hyg., 35, 643. I960) 362. Scansetti. G.. Rubino. G. F., and Trompeo. G., Med. Lavoro, 50, "43 (1959) 363. Rubino. G. F., Scansetti. G., Trom* peo, G., and Gaido, P. C.. Med. Lavoro, 50, 755 (1959) 364. Andersson, A., Acta Med. Scand., 157 Suppl. 323, 11 (1957) [Bull. Hyg., 32. 972, 1957) 365. Guyotjeannin, C-, and Van Sceenkiste. J.. Arch. Mol. Prof.. 19, 459 (1953) (Bull. Hyg., 34, 460 (1959) 366. Lachnic, V., and Brichta, G., Zent. Arbeitsmed. 8, 56 (1953) (Bull. Hyg., 33, 767, 1953) 367. Capellini, A., and Grisler, R.. Med. Cavorts, 49, 167 (195S) (Bull. Hyg., 33,674 (1953) 363. Albahary, C-, Guyotjeannin, C., Flaisler, A., and Thiacourt. P., Arch. Mai. Prof., 20, 421 (1959) (Bull. Hyg.. 34, 1263, 1959) 369. Guvotjeannin. C., and Guyotjeannin, G,, Folia Med. (Naples), 42, 924 (1959) (Biol. Abstr.. 35,21194) 370. 3*1. Reinl, VV., Zertt. Arbeitsmed. 7, 53 (1957) (Bull. Hyg.. 32. 673, 1957) Medek. V., Pracov. likarstvi, 10, 135 (1953) (Chem. Abstr., 53, 11717', 1959) 372. Engel, H. O.. Trans. Assoc. Indust. Med. Queers, 6, 96 (1956) 37J. Roche. L., Lejeune, E., and RitTat, G.. Lyon Med., 200, 769 (1953) (Chem. Abstr., S3, 9460J, 1959) 374. Parmeggiani, L.. .Med. Lavoro. 47. 639 (1956) (Bull. Hyg., 32, 345. 1957) 375. Fleischhacker, M.. Djuric, D.. and Zadro. I., Arch. Hyg. Rada, 7, 41 (1956) (Chem. Abstr., 51, 3319*. 1957) 376. Souiek, B., and Vlachovd. D-. Brit. J. Indust. Med., 17, 60 (I960) 377. Soucek, B., andVlachovd. D.. Pracov. lekarstvi, 11, 457 (1959) (Ckem. Abstr., 54, 19975', I960) 373. Vlachovd. D., J. Hyg., Epid., Mikro- biol., Immunol., 1, 225 (1957) J79. Abrahamsen, A. M., Acta Pharmacol., 17, 2SS (I960) 330. Abrahamsen, A. M., Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest., 9, 406 (1937) 331. Bardodej, Z.. and Krivuco%'4. M., Ceskoslov. Hyg., 3, 263 (1953) 332. Bartonicek. V., and Soucek, B.. Arch. f. Ceverbepalh. u. Gewerbehyg.. 17, 2S3 (1959) (Bull. Hygiene, 34, 1140 (t959) 333. Bartonicek, V.. Arch. Cexeerbepatk. 18, 317 (I960) (Bull. Hyg., 36. 444 (1961) 334. *Cooper, J. R., and Friedman. P. J.. Fed. Proc., 17. 360 (1953) 3S5. Cooper, ]. R., and Friedman, P. J.. Biochem. Pharmacol., 1, 76 (1953) 336. Friedman. P. J.. and Cooper. J. R-, Anal. Ckem.. 30, 1674 (1953) 337. Friedman, P. J., and Cooper. J. R., J. Pharmacol. Exptl. Ther., 129, 373 (I960) 333. Lob. M.. Med. Laxoro, 51. 337 (t960) (Bull. Hyg., 36, 337, 1961) 339. Seto, T. A., and Schukze, M. O.. Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med., 90. 314 (1955) 390. Seto. T, A., and Schukre. M. O.. J. A m. Chetn. Soc.. 73, 1616 (1956) 391. Seto, T. A., and Schultzs. M. O., Anal. Chem.. 28. 1625 (1956) 392. Seto, T. A.. Schukre, M. O.. Perman, V., Bates, F. W.. and Sautter, J. H., J. Agr. Food Chem., 6, 49 (1953) 39J. Rehfeld, C. E., Perman, V., Sautter, J. H., and Schukre. M. O.. J. Agr. Food Chem., 6, 227 (1953) 394, Schukze. M. O., Klubcs, P.. Perman. V., Mizuno. X. S.. Bates. F. W., and Sautter. J. H.. Blood. 14, 1015 (1959) 395. McKinney. L. L.. Picken. J. C.. Weakley, F. B.. Eldridge. A. C.. Campbell. R. E., Cowan. C. J.. and Biester. H. E., J. Am. Chem. SoC., 81, 909 (1959) J96. Mizuno. X. S.. Hagerty. G. J.. Joel. D. D.. Sautter. J. H., and Schukze, M. 0., Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med., 103, 577 (1960) 397. Pritchard, W. R.. Davis. O. S.. Taylor. D. 8., and Doyle, L. P.. Am. J. Vet. Research, 17, 171 (1956) 393. Jeney. E., Bartha. F.. Kondor. L., and Szendrei, S-. Egeszsegtudomuny, (Budapest) l, 142, 151. 135 (1957) (Bull. Hyg.. 33. 964) 399. Paparopoli, G. and Cali. V.. Folia Med. (Naples), 39, 319 (1956) (Chem. Abstr., 51, 633', 1957) 400. Lob., M.. Arch. Cewerbepath., 16, 45 (1957) (Bull. Hyg.. 33, 563, 1938) 401. Baba. T.. Xagaca, K., and Aizawa. T., Gunma J. Med. 5ci. (Japan), R&S 136168 393 CHEXOWETH AND HAKE 5, 231 (1936) (Chem. Abstr., 51, HJ32, 1957) 102. Stewart. R. D., Gay, H. H., Erley, D. S,, Ha.s, C. L., and Schaner. A. W., Arch. im'ran, Health, 2, 316 (1961) 403. Zhemerdel, A. I., Trudy Leningrad Sanit. Cigien. Sled. Inst., 44, 164 (1958) (.Chem. Abstr., 55. 2396. 1961*) 404. Lieaert, A. Wiener Tier&rsil. Manats- schr., 47, 444 (I960) (Biol. Absn.. 35,62414.1940) 405. Jondorf. W. R.. Parke, D. V.. and Williams, R. T., Biochem. J., 65, 14 (1957) 406. Grenby. T. H.. and Young. L., Bio chem. J., 75, 23 (1960) 407. Torkelson. T. R., Wolf. M. A.. Oyen, F., and Rowe, V. K.; Am. Indust. Hyi. Assoc. J., 20, 217 (1939) 403. Garkavi. p. G., Gigiena i Sanit., 24, 26 (1959) (Chem. Abstr., 54, 260Q\ 1959) 409. Bray, H. G., and James, S. P., Bio chem. J., 74, 6 (I960)* 410. Mkheyan, V. E., losest. A had. Xauk Armyan S.S.B., Biot, i Sel'skokhoa Xauki, 12, 35 (1959) (Chem. Abstr., 53, 20537*, 1959)* 411. Mtrrabekyan, G. I., and Nikogosyan, S. V., Gigiena Truda i Prof. ZaboU evJniya, 3, 13 (1950) (Chem. Abstr., $4, 2571*, i960) 412. Clayton. J. W., Delaplane, M. A,, and Hood. D. B., Am. Indust. Hyt. Assoc. J.. 21, 382 (1960) 413. Pattison, F. L. M,, Toxic Aliphatic Fluorine Compounds (Elsevier Publ. Co. inc.. New Vork, pp. 227, 1959) English translation will be announced in Technical Translations, issued by the Office of Technical Services, (J. S. Department of Commerce, and will be made available by the Phoeoduplication Service. Library of Congress, and by the SLA Translation Center at the John Crerar Library, Chicago, Illinois.