Document 93KBR2yDp9wor395OyJp1y34e

Message From: Sent: To: CC: Subject: Robinson, Lisa [robinson@hsph.harvard.edu] 12/8/2017 2:40:22 PM I----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joe Arvai [jlarvai@umich.edu]; Sally M. Kane j Ex. 6 Personal Privacy (PP) Beck, Nancy [/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=Exchange Admmistrtivi'Grup 1OEYDIBgHF23SPDLJl/.cn=Recipients/cn=168ecb5184ac44de95a913297f353745-Beck, Nancy]; F Bouder i Ex. 6Personal Privacy(PP) t Terje Aven [terje.aven@uis.no] R: fuesday Plenary"/ Re: updates slides from Terje Panel SRA 2017 Tuesday Thanks Sally et: aU I also feel like I am not the right person to talk about society-wide trends. On Joe's second point - in my experience, which is primarily in US regulatory policy and analysis, "facts"/analysis/science have always played somewhat of a subsidiary role to other concerns, and their importance has waxed and waned - varying by policy issue as weil as over time. I agree with a point Terje makes in his slides: this is not necessary a problem, it often reflects (legitimate) disagreements about how to deal with uncertainty as well as value judgments. I've been working on some slides which i wili send later, and plan to discuss (1) the role of economic analysis in the (U.S.) regulatory decisionmaking process; (2) how judgment permeates the conduct of regulatory analysis and benefit-cost analysis more generally; and (3) some recommendations for what we (SRA and risk analysts more generaily) can do to improve the use and usefulness of analysis. ! also expect to talk for about 10 minutes, if that is OK with you. From: Joe Arvai [mailto:jlarvai@umich.edu] Sent: Friday, December 08, 2017 7:45 AM To: Sally M. Kanej Ex. 6 Personal Privacy (PP) i Cc: Beck, Nancy <Beck.Nancy@epa.gov>; Robinson, Lisa <robinson@hsph.harvard.edu>; F Bouder [ Ex. 6 Personal Privacy (PP) i Terje Aven <terje.aven@uis.no> Subject: Re: Tuesday Plenary / Re: updates slides from Terje Panel SRA 2017 Tuesday Thanks, Sally. My talk, which should be about 10 minutes long, will address all but one of the questions that Terje originally sent in the plenary abstract: 1. How has the post-truth society (in which objective facts are become less influential in shaping public opinion) been able to develop? o I won't be able to answer this one; it's toofar outside my expertise. 2. Why are "alternative facts" and "fake news" becoming household names? o They've always been there, they simply get updated tables from time-to-time. 3. Has science sought to stretch its domain too widely and denied uncertainties? o No. Andyes. 4. Or, is the truth not comfortable enough for those in power or seeking power? o It has more to do with efficacy and less to do with comfort. Best, Joe D i ', . l o f \ -S il School of Business.Iw jttg r ...Google S cholar... H 73-4 64? 38 91 .Dedsjgns4G ood...E rb jp s tfto te | Business for Susteinajailty On Dec 8, 2017, at 2:30 AM, Sally M. Kane] Ex. 6 Personal Privacy (PP) [wrote: i__________________________________________________ ! Hi. I am delighted to be working with Terje on the Tuesday AM Plenary. The topic is timely and broad. Later today I will be sending out the order of speakers are off ofer some comments. Thank you Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 12 ED 002061 00038609-00001 Sally Sally M. Kane, Ph.D. j Ex. 6 Personal Privacy (PP) j On Dec 7, 2017, at 8:39 PM, Beck, Nancy <Beck.Nancy@epa.qov> wrote: Attached are some draft slides I am considering. I will essentially focus on how the new TSCA statute requires a transparent accounting of uncertainties in our risk evaluations. Please let me know if this is not what you were looking for. Safe travels to those of you that are heading our way! Nancy Nancy B. Beck, Ph.D., DABT Deputy Assistant Administrator, OCSPP P: 202-564-1273 M 6 i jII___E_____x_._________P___e___r___s__o____n___a___l___P___r___i_v___a___c___y_____(_P____P____)__iI beck.nancy@epa.gov From: Terje Aven [mailto:terie.aven@uis.no1 Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2017 11:38 AM To: F Bouder [ Ex. 6 Personal Privacy (PP) j Cc: Joe Arvai <jiarvai@umich.edu>; Kane, Sally j Ex. 6 Personal Privacy (ppj !>; robinson@hsph.harvard.edu; Beck, Nancy <Beck. Nancy@epa.gov> Subject: SV: updates slides from Terje Panel SRA 2017 Tuesday Thanks, sorry here is the correct email address for Nancy Beck.Nancy@epa.gov; Best Terje Sendt fra E-post for Windows 10 Fra: F Bouder \ Ex. 6 Personal Privacy (PP) j Sendt: Sunday, November 26, 2017 5:24:06 PM Til: Terje Aven Kopi: Joe Arvai; Kane, Sally; Nancy Beck; robinson@hsph.hary3rd.edu Emne: Re: updates slides from Terje Panel SRA 2017 Tuesday Dear Terje, I think this is very straight forward ! Best regards Frederic On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 at 10:17, Terje Aven <teTje.aven@nis.no> wrote: Hi Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 12 ED 002061 00038609-00002 I have simplified my slides and message a little - see e.g. slide 7 leading to two key questions. Best Terje Sendt fra E-post for Windows 10 <TSC A Implementation.SRA. 12.12.17v2.pptx> Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 12 ED 002061 00038609-00003