Document 8RKnXgK4BOLnLXbJ6Ka6gONVy

E, I. DuPont de Nemours Co. Newark, NJ Attention: Mr. H. Ricardo i i 1 page 4 Feb. 9, 1977 QUOTATION R: TO COVER CONVERSION OF EXISTING 42" SQUARE PRESSLOAD OF POLYPROPYLENE PLATES AND FRAMES FROM THREE WAY VALVE OPEN AND CLOSED DELIVERY SYSTEM TO OPEN DELIVERY BY USING LEVER HANDLE SPIGOT. 1 - NEW head plate, 1-3/16" thick, #1 button, complete with lever handle spigot ------ ----------------------------- ----------- $ 112.50 1 - NEW tail plate, 1-3/16" thick, #1 button, complete with lover handle spigot ---t A------------------- - 112,50 26 - Si button pressure plates - reworked. Operations required - reverse plate: A. Spin weld plug in existing port in existing three- way valve port. B. Drill new discharge port in bottom blank pad. C. Drill pilot holes for spigot and assemble spigot. Labor ..... $12.00 each -------- -------------- ------ -------- 312.00 New lever handle spigot, $5.50 each ---------------- -- -- 143.00 27 - #3 button wash plates - reworked. Operations required - reverse plate: A. Spin weld plug in existing port in existing three- way valve port. B. Drill new discharge port in bottom blank pad. C. Drill pilot holes for spigot and assemble spigot. D. Spin weld plug in existing wash port and drill new wash port in opposite. Labor ..... $21.00 each ------------- ---------- - ------ ---- 567,00 New lever handle spigot, $5.50 each --------------- 148.50 54 - frames - no labor required-------- ----- ------- -------------- --* Replace existing 4" thick adapter currently being used for three way system. 1 - new 42" square connection plate, 1" thick, drilled^ and counterbored for two 2" dia. pull thru liner pipes. 2 - new 2" x 12" long liner pipes complete with 0-rings and locknuts, $45 each-------- ----------------------------------- --- 146.00 90.00 Total Sales Price --- - -- ------ ------------------------------------- - -- - - $1631.50 Additional if installation of bolt-on handles is desired on all of the above: 26 - #1 button plates 27 - ft5 button plates 54 -H2 button frames 107 pieces - labor $12.00 each------- - ---------------------- - $1284.00 - 15 - N35363 * DUP050108999 E. I. DuPont de Nemours Co Newark, NJ Attention: Mr . I L Ricardo Appendix 7 page- 5 Feb. 9, 1977 214 molded polypropylene universal handles (2-bo,lt design as furnished on 36" pressload) complete with stainless steel lag Screws and washers, $3.75 each------ --------- --------- ------------------ Total Sales Price 802.50 $2086.50 Terms: net 30 days Delivery: one week after receipt of goods from you Very truly yours DENSER AMERICA INC. ALW: rsb Allan L. Whitlock 16 - DUP050109000 'Press 25 -F7W Hea? iDin 3 Appendix 7 er Feed L v A Wa.sK Eb/e O V7 r* *U i v< ' &-ffiuen4- E\i e~~^ :<--i Feed tLvje SoKd ' Efki sd i no 'T^p'mcj j 4-q be re-kai ned * T^oFed J ^`xfs'b<n^ rAp/nj, "bo be nem^'/ed.- <r; DUP050109001 DISTRIBUTION 1. E, Gonick, Pigm.,Wilm./Newark Library 2. E. E, Jaffe, Pigm., Newport/Circulate and file 3. Newport Library k*W. S. Struve/H. Matrick/Library 5. A* P. Smith 6. J. P. Higgins/j, Jacksn/B. H. Perkins/Library 7. J. N. Birmingham 8. J.R.Goughnour/T.R.Becker/F. Scalice 9. D. C. Gero/R. P. Mitchell/W. T. Harrington/J. A Johnson 10. Newark Numerical Pile Code; 10k,12 11. Newark Library - Central Report Index 12. Newark Library - Central Report Index 13. Extra 14. Extra 15. Extra Security - None DUP050109002 KN-76-6A September, 1976 Copy No. 20 Distribution on Last Page NEWPORT PLANT PIGMENTS COLORS R & D E, I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF PROPOSED PROCESSES FOR BB-CPC FINAL REPORT Work Done By: Previous Related Reports Project Code: Period Covered; Notebook Nos. : W. L. Mon son & L. R.. Valencourt None 4650-800 2/1/76 to 9/1/76 N/A ABSTRACT High spot evaluation of non-polluting processes for N-8510 (BB) shows that the proposed process for crude manufacture with crude Luwa drying in CPC-II, and serai-finishing by acetone milling in CPC-I is competitive with twelve candidate experimental processes. DU P050109003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Objectives................ . .1 Sumitiary/Conclusions . ....... .1 Discussion. .2 Appendices........... .8 1..........------------------------------------------------------------- 9 11....................................................................................... . .10 III-------------------------------------------------------------------------------.12 Distribution 13 DUP050109004 I. Introduction In an attempt to evaluate the feasibility of several experimental CPC production schemes, the essential material, operative and distributive portions of a standardized mill cost were calculated and compared. Whenever possible, current <1975 composite values) Newport operating expenses were used. Assumptions made regarding yield losses, solvent recovery efficiency, labor requirements and others were made based on Pigments or Orchexn Department experience and empirical data. II. Objectives The objectives of this study were: to evaluate the economics of several potential CPC production routes versus a standard manufacturing technique on a common basis, to indicate the approximate new investment required for each scheme, and to provide enlightenment about which avenues of experimentation to pursue in greater detail (and conversely which experimental endeavors to abandon). ill. Summary/Conclusions A high-spot costing of nine experimental routes to semi finished Blue B was carried out. All costs were compared to the process (synthesis and semi-finishing by acetone milling) as practiced in Plant I. Luwa dried Blue B crude entirely produced in Plant II and semi-finished in Plant I is significantly lower in cost. . An experimental process which involves synthesis in kerosene and.subsequent sulfation in TCB is significantly high in cost primarily due to high cost of two solvent losses. One process, involving synthesis and sulfation in TCB could be significantly low in cost if two criteria are met; high concentration synthesis and high solvent recovery. Investment is also required. The cost differences between most of the experimental processes is less than the uncertainty in cost of individual cases, with the exceptions noted above. DUP050109005 2 IV. Discussion As indicated in the charts found in the Appendix (based on W, L. Monson*s talk presented at Newark, N.J.) the following bases and assumptions were used in these calculations; SF product - N8510. Production of 413 cwt/mo. is based on 1976-80 long range forecast. Essential material costs were the Newport average costs for 1975 (except for bulk TCB, ODCB and Vtl&P which were based on E & M estimates). Current (IIQ1976) wage rates. Newport supervisor, labor, etc. factors were used. Used blue book values and usage investments for estimating maintenance and depreciation. Assumed that all capacity was in use. All yield losses were entirely around filters and Stills. The thirteen cases considered were divided among two standard (Cases 1 and 2; old plant process and the new proposed production method using both Plant I and II respectively) and eleven experimentally proposed cases- The experimentally proposed Cases involved breaching BBU processes, active solvent (both CDCB and TCB) sulfation, active solvent synthesis, acid swelling, aqueous milling and breaching (in different volumes and solvents; perclene/QDCB) of BBZ. These cases involved various combinations of both old and new plant equipment (plus some new investment in some cases) and are detailed in the Appendices. Presented on the next page (and repeated in the Appendices along with the work sheets) are the resulting mill cost components for the 13 cases considered. R.M. (raw materials including the essential material, i.e. , packaging) includes all the known ingredi ents in each process, and current Pigments or Orchem experience when solvent recovery was considered. Yield losses, considered to be centered around the filters and still, for computational purposes, were also included in the R.M, calculations. The results ranged from a low of $124/cwt. (ODCB breaching of BBZ: processes 2IB and 22B) to a high of $209/cwt. which is Process 4. Process 4 (and 5) have such large R.M. costs because both involve syn thesis in one solvent (kero) and sulfation in another (4:TCB; 5;ODCB) wifh solvent losses in both processes. DUP050109006 3. LpROC KM 1 135 2 123 3: 133 .4 203 5 .201 6 163. 7 156 8 mo : I ii 131~ 12i 4 431 1Z4 -of i)15TR NO. !#M. BOOK MILLS MILL. o p e r -Lv a l u e . NEW. mv_' LABOR: INVEST PRE! SOLV. (mm). a .380 139. 64 331L 127 63 .335 Ii __ i 130 76 415 123 76 105 m 62 i 62 126 jML 436 i 130 .j .66 ti 68' 130 68 !; 135 .75 .1 m 175' 406- i i '333~ 326i ' '335.. .4l_ ^33. 5ji l ~328^ I i 322 340' `334' 40. 4453. .1-- 29i 1668; 2 6 1939t ;I 23 2324 __ . ' 23i 2326 ! 13 .1860. I 19 .0.4. :3.13: .. L _3:ia. _0 _0i 0. i _0 .0 -0_ i ~0 _0_ oZ 636 1136r t 1136; B00 BOO 25 1949 14 H J35: \0.84UM ?o~ 27 .1898. 046 0 .636 27 0.78 , 0 I- ' i-1* 27 2303. .0.78,0. 271 2303 "0 .905 * 405P DUP050109007 4 IV. Discussion (Cont.) The operative portion of mill cost was considered to be composed of: Utilities (used current Newport rates). Repair material and labor. Operating labor and supervision. Waste neutralization, Product Services, Environmental Control, Works Lab Quality Control and all other operative expenses not contained above. Current Newport labor and utility rates were used in all cases. Newport figures were used in cases involving ratios of various costs (i.e. , repair material as a ratio of repair cost bo total investment). Some processes were high in operating expenses because of large utility requirements (steam for tray drying; Process 1; large electricity usage for a large number of mills: Processes 1, 2 and 9; or labor intensive operations: again Process l). Distributive costs involved depreciation, general overhead and non-technical expenses explicitly. All other implicitly contained distributive costs were lumped together as other. Depreciation was assumed to be 10%/year and was based on book value and fractional usage of the equipment involved. These three components then make up the mill cost. While every attempt has been made to insure accuracy and to avoid errors, the assumptions used to derive these figures can, at best, be no better than +5%. Probably, +20% is a more realistic error range, but for the purposes of this study +5% illustrates the point vividly enough. The mill cost ranged from $322/cwt. (Process 2IB) to $415/cwt. (Process 4) while the Newport standard costs for N-8510 is listed as $<407/cwt. It should be noted that none of the processes studied here, either standard or experi mentally proposed, are currently in use at Newport. To finish the summarization of the chart on the previous page, operating labor, book value investment, mill usage and estimated required new investment (out of pocket costs) for each of these processes are shown. New investment ranges from none to a high of $1136M for Processes 4 and 5 (both require similar equipment, even though different solvents are involved). The graph presented on the following page represents the results of this study- Mill cost +5% is presented for each of the cases studied. As noted earlier, slight modifications in the assumption, for solvent recovery or yield will perturb any one case beyond the extent of any of the other cases; in other words, the limits on any one case extend wider than the limits on all the cases together as shown. DUP050109008 5 IV. Discussion (Cont.) As illustrated in the Appendix for the "typical" ease (Process 6) the effect of solvent/product volume and solvent losses are calculated. The ease used in these calculations was 9% loss with a volume of 3500 gallons; this resulted in a mill cost of $333/cwt. If, as Orchem experience indicates, one can produce quality product with l/4th the solvent volume, then at the same solvent loss (9%) there is a net savings of approximately $45/cwt. This is illustrated in the left hand cost bar on the preceding graph for Process 6. However, if we go to the other extreme, of large solvent volume (3500 gals.) and large solvent losses (24%), there is about a $100/cwt. cost penalty. This extreme is illustrated by the right-hand cost bar for Process 6 on the preceding graph. Thus by merely varying the solvent volume (3500 to 875 gals.) and the solvent losses (9% to 24%; nb: both are limits of Orchem experience for TCB recovery) we have extended the limits on Process 6 from $333/cwt. +5%, to $290/cwt. to $430/cwt. +5%. $290/cwt., not including the possibility of the -5% error, is lower than the lowest mill cost for all the other Processes: $322/cwt. The upper limit, $430/cwt., is also larger than the largest of the remaining process mill costs, $415/cwt. Thus, the conclusion is drawn that within each process there is room for improvement on the mill cost estimate that is greater than the range between the mill costs of all the cases (i.e.. Process 6: $290 to 430/cwt. vs. low $322 to high $415/cwt.). Thus, before any additional time should be invested in analyzing the effect of various experimental procedures on plant mill cost, better definition of the process variables is necessary. In addition, it appears that the lowest mill.cost, with minimum investment, is obtained by the proposed Method 2: Synthesis through Luwa drying in Plant II, followed by milling through press/mixing/and packout in the old plant. New investment required is zero, and the mill cost is near the lower limits of this study (within the error limits established, all these processes are economically the same) $331/cwt. In an attempt to gain additional insight into these cost studies a "sort of" sensitivity study of a few variables was run. As illustrated in the Appendix, the effect of solvent type, solvent volume and percent solvent loss on mill cost is graphed. Both ODCB and Perclene were considered as breaching solvents and losses ranged from 0-40%. For example, at 84 gals, solvent/batch, and a 9% loss the difference in mill cost between ODCB and Perclene is about $3.50/cwt. of product. Finally, a "mini" decision tree analysis of processes 21 and 22 was constructed and is analyzed here. As illustrated in the Appendix, the mill cost for each proposed process at each indi cated solvent loss level was calculated ($/cwt. on right hand side of chart) The probability that these levels of solvent recovery could be achieved were estimated from previous experience. Using standard decision tree logic, the system was manipulated until the expected mill cost for processes 21 and 22 was obtained. DU P050109009 6 DUP050109010 7 IV. Discussion [Cont.) In this case the most probable mill cost for Process 21 is $328/cwt and for Process 22 is $341/cwt. These estimates are,of course, sensitive to the probabilities attached to the possible attainment of the solvent loss levels indicated. Additional work could alter these results significantly (as illustrated earlier). In conclusion, while all these costs are to be considered equivalent and that additional laboratory work is necessary to further define some of the process limits, the components that make up a mill cost estimate should be recalled. The mill cost is directly dependent on: What you make (we made N-8510) How you make it (standard formula/receipts) How much you make (413 cwt/mo.) What equipment you make it in When you make it How many people make it What, other porcesses use the same equipment How do you distribute in direct costs, /Ivs DUP050109011 8 APPENDICES DUP050109012 APPENDIX I LETTERS C. W. Anderson to E. E. Jaffe J. Jackson to E. E. Jaffe J. Jackson to C. F. Rolle 2/3/76 2/3/76 1/22/76 DUP050109013 K-tOTJ 10.4.3 E. !, d u Po n t d e Ne mo u r s & Co mp a n y wco'j'OtKyr.o Ne w p o r t , De l a w a r e i9S04 PIGMENTS DEPARTMENT / CG: N. J, Kane - Newport A. P. Smith - " BSh February 3, 1976 E. E-. JAFFE NEWPORT. . There are five process schemes which could potentially be use'd to finish BB products in CPC III. It would be very useful in guiding our research efforts to have these routes evaluated against the process for BT-284-D. The evaluation should include equipment availability and cost. The alternates are outlined be low: 1, BT-284-D Process (N-85IO precursor) Synthesis of BB crude S0P-1-Q (4-CPA) S0P-2-W (BB crude) & Premill 1100 lbs. - 6 hr. . S0P-21-C Acetone mill 552 lbs. - 20 hr. S0F-4-Q Distill acetone, filter, wash, dry sop-5-0 . ,2 BT-449-D Process A. To make N-8500 Synthesis of B3 crude S0P-1-Q (4-CPA) S0P-2-W (BB crude) & Premill 1200 lbs. - 15 hr. S0P-34-A Breach 1400 lbs. in Perclene < SOP-49-B B. . Experimental (X0P-241-B) Synthesis of BB crude - As above, except particle size and phase is controlled in sulfation and hydrolysis to give product equal to BBZ o Breach 1400 lbs. in 0DC3 1 s Replace Perclene with 0BCB In S0P-49-B j on: ...' . j fu - SETTER THINGS TOR GETTER LIVING . , . tHNOUi.l! CHEK<STftT DUP050109014 2- - . Isolation , of Crude BB o Synthesis of BB crude S0P-1-Q (4-CPA) S0P-2-W (BB crude to step 23) tv *' ? V o Filter off kerosene from slurry and dry free of kero 5 (?) hrs. filter 31 hrs^jOrying ------ -p&n 4 Add 106 galODCB or TCB to full CPC dried charge. . . (Before or after sulfuric acid addition - not yet determined) Sulfation as per CPC-BB normal withoutdecanting.(S0P-2-W, #23-2 Hydrolysis (S0P-2-W, #27-32) ' ; '' Caustic addn. and ext. (S0P-2-W, #33-38) . o Steam distill to remove ODCB - 7 hrs. Filter and wash with water as normal (step #40 and 41, S0P-2-H, BB crude syn.) but to alkaline free . . Follow steps #22 to 34 SOP-5-0 for finishing B-8510 to make K-85IO slurry 4. TCB or ODCB Process A TG3 ' PpAsdL, . ) AWa/u Mt <0 Synthesis of BB crude S0P-1-Q (4-CPA) S0P-2-W (BB crude to step 40) Run as. usual except substitute TCB for kerosene LAJ j Steam distill to remove TSB >7 Filter, wash and dry S0P-2-W (steps 40-58) SOP-5-0 B, ODCB As above except replace TCB with ODCB V. 5. Aqueous Milling (Per J. Jackson) Synthesis, of BB crude S0P-1-Q (4-CPA) S0P-2-H (BB crude) ; Premill 1200 lbs. - 15 hr. SOP-34-A DUP050109015 -3- 5. (Continued) ' Aqueous ball mill the 15 hr. BBZ assuming a 2OX scale-up of the. Newark s emi-works charge: ' * Gal. VMP Lbs. As Lbs. BBZ Gal. HgO Naphtha- Surfactant Arq,uad 16/50 type 736 443 27.6 73.6 Aerosel OT/75 type 736 443 27.6 49 Filter Wash and dry the ball mill discharge 6. Aclfl Swelling LtJ-Ph, '' Synthesis Of BB crude S0P-1-Q (4-CPA) S0P-2-U (BB crude). { \ 1 _p ' , *1 V ' Premill 1100 lbs. - 6 hr. S0P-21-C 2l'J ' " . . . - . Acid swell as per ESA process S0P-28-P ... f- PencU-^JL . ' a, iv, fyu^tu,. c. w. aj j d er s o n RESEARCH SUPERVISOR DUP050109016 h. j l . u u 'f u n t an Nmuuub Aflu CUMPhltit Pigments Department CC:\IT. S. Struve, Pigra., Newark \J. IT. Anderson (3), Pign., Newport A. P. Smith, (3), Pign., Newport Newark, New Jersey February 3, 1976 . . Jaffe Figments Newport 1 STATUS "AQUEOUS'* MILLED BLUE B STUDIES As per your request^I am outlining below the state of my studies in this area. Essentially the basic process is the same as that outlined for LCZ aqueous milling, with the exception of the change in crude. The largest millings to date have been made as follows:. Mill size .41 gals- 95 grs B3Z - 15 hrs (shorter cycle should be tested) 480 gs Water ' 30 cc (22.6 grs) VMP/Haphtha* 6.4 gr Aerosol OT/75% Mill 24 hrs/4000 gr 1/3" shot/220 RPM ITe would expect that XOP 441 conditions would be applicable with the decrease in water usage to the above ratio. I'ork up would be via distillation and acid extraction as per XCP 441. The basic plant milling charge would be 736 lbs BBZ (15 hr) 443 gals H20 27.6 gals VMP/Kaphtha/49 lbs Aerosol 0T with an expected milling cycle of 7 1/2 hrs. By means of these procedures, we have prepared toner pigments from several lots of BBZ (15 hrs) which are darker in masstone - stronger and greener and more intense than BT-284-D - 80920 (N8540/N3600 - no extender) see E6124-99; 104; ES147-40A. " ITe have also converted this type pigment to a 3T-425-D counterpart. ITe have tested these materials in paint as follows: ^ E6124-104B (BT-425-D Type) vs BT-425-P 96532 Ball mill - Ford Thermosetting acrylic Metallic - Red intense better twotone-strg-red tint Viscosity - Higher - Reduction or elimination under study DUP050109017 E6147-40A Ball Milled 927 Lacquer vs BT-284-P (80920 - Toner Type) Metallic - Red, intense, better twotone Strong - red tints Viscosity - w slightly higher An attempt to duplicate BT-481-? has been made (E6147-49A) utilizing the above process except that the mill contains: 96 gr BBZ - 15 hrs 480 cc 8*0 No solvent .2 gr Carbopol 941 7.2 grs Siponic L25 This product compares quite well with BT-481-P lot 1153 in an ' 'All Aqueous' ' type textile ink test (Sherwin Williams). A small amount of the sample has been submitted to Phil Krape at Chestnut Run for evaluation in universal colorants. ;t - . / DUP050109018 E. I. DU TOUT DE NEMOURS AND COMPAQ Pigments Department CC: W. S. Struve, Pigm*, Newark E. Jaffe, Pigra., Newport ^ W. Anderson, Pigm., Newport A, P, Smith, Pigm.', Newport A, F* Lewis, Pigm., Newport Newark, New Jersey January 22, 1976 C. F. ROLLE PIGMENTS' WIIMliIGTON : . - .> - - ; . ; 'r..: . : .. A ... ' ; -u-i . A.QUEOUS MILLED 6 PHASE CPC ~ COSTING A ' A:.- v..:- A-A..Ref: 1) XOP-441 - . -.v A' r:- ,..v ' A -. r. -ij : 2) C.F.Rolle-A.F.Lewis 10/7/75 : : . 3) A.F.Lewis-C. F.Rolls 10/23/75 . . T As you are aware, we are actively working with Inmont in an attempt to develop a * * semi-finished 6 phase CPC" for sale to supplement their viscous salt milling capacity (see JJ-USS 10/13/75). Such sales might replace future sales of products such as BT-487-P. However, Inmont has stated that they have approached our competitor's with the same request, with the objective of lowering their 3 phase CPC costs. It is also distinctly possible that this*approach night lead.to considerably larger sales to InmonC since their total CPC use is much larger than our sales to them- ` ' ' * " * *..... . Ha have submitted an aluminum sulfate mill powder N8700 which was unsatis--. factory in their processing. Additional N codes containing other surfactants will be submitted, but it is the writer's opinion they will be rejected because of the high electrolyte content. Because of the above failure, we have submitted two forms of aqueous ball mill slurry taken directly from the ball mill without any further distillation or extraction, etc. After considerable work, both forms (SW75-00734 - 18 hr LCZ/H20/VHP-Naphtha/ Arquad 16-50 and SW75-00745 - 18 hrs LCZ/HaO/VMP-Naphtha/Aerosol OX) have been successfully converted to inks at Inmont, Tinctorial properties remain to be ascertained. Assuming satisfactory technical results at Inmont the question of economics will immediately arise. It seems that our costs of such a product should be realistically determined. The basic process outline is similar to XOP. 441J DUP050109019 s); Synthesis of LC crude - b) Premill 1200 lbs r. Maximum of IS. hrs - shorter time cycles are under study, c) Aqueous ball mill tlie 18 hr LCZ''assuming a 2OX scale up of the 58 gallon Newark seibi-works charge: - bbs As is 'lbs LCZ ) Gals Ha0 Gals yi-fl*/Naphtha Surfactant Arquad 16/50 type* : 735 ' 443 27.6 73,6 Aerosol OT/75 Type 736 443 27.6 for a cycle of 6-9 hrs with a probable cycle of 7 1/2 hrs. 49 . The ball mill discharge would be pumped into a Suitable container for direct shipment to Tnmont. No wash out of the mill is contemplated. .. .. * This process would completely eliminate any sewer effluent problems or distillation or extraction, etc. problems, and should make possible the sale of higher quantities of CPC. ..Profitability should be determined assuming several price levels. \ : ; I',.-?:"'.'I .. *Arquad 16/29 water type under study. V DUP050109020 io APPENDIX II REDUCED WALL CHARTS W. L. MONSON'S PRESENTATION AT NEWARK DUP050109021 u NOTE TO APPENDICES AMD SUBSEQUENT CALCULATIONS: The mill costs calculated earlier and presented in the Table summarizing mill cost, et.al., includes the increased distributive and operating expenses necessitated by the required new investment {Column 10). However, the raw data sheets, the graphical presentation of mill costs, and the sensitivity/ decision tree calculations do not include these increases. The necessary conversion is a simple mathematic manipulation, summarized here. Each A $M o f investment is equivalent to a A of $16.5422/cwt. of N-8510 product (ca $.04/lb.), However, due to product distribution only 52% of this new investment is carried over into our calculations. 42% of this carryover goes into increased operating expenses, and 58% goes into increased distributive expenses. i.e, Xi = New investment for process i $M .52Xi - New investment added to process i $M 52Xi (16.5422/413).42 ~ increment to add to process i's operating expense $/lb. .52Xi (16.5422/413).58 = increment to add to process i*s distributive expense $/lb. DUP050109022 :o f3AEE APD A34UMPT/EP , EF PPCPl/ET - PEE/O __________ _ __ PPCPPE77ON PPP/A /E76-0P lOPSPAPaE FSPEEASZL____ ___ PEA/PPPT. PEMA/VP /S 4/.? EWr/AAP ------- 6S % PFTP7AL- PS - ---------- ------------ ~52 %--; 83 ASEE _ . /8 Vo - "Z: - 3/PP._______ _____ _ - // % - - s p s --------------------- P P8E/P PEEP /N ~~ ^ - /z 0co&- e p p e s ~ : : - 1 7 &PEE/7 EPEES-- ------------ -7 + TPTAL 3S + 3SE PPPPE PEA44//P Z. /s? s s p p e t / / .^p p p p e a p ______ ______________ _ -e s s e p t /a l ma t z p p /e e s a /e p e p y e . /<?7e ........ (EXCEPT ESP 3ELK EES, PPSPAA/P-FPEP)------- CPPPEPT MASE PATES / /FT FACTAPS EPE SEP'//lASAP, PEE. '. ' '' _L_ 3PPP VA/PE APE PEASE /PAESEfEPPM/PpPEPPEE) ~~ALE~PAPAS/TY /// PEE'' ` " ..' " ~ '~ ^ZZA/ELPLPESESZEPPPEZyZZAPEPPP-E//rEPSPAEM^E DUP050109023 iI p- T* -O: ii ii NZ5I6 PROCESSES PLT.X L PLT. 1L OLD' ! i 1 PLT...... ' PROPOSED ' PLT. 1 J/* s y n t h -s u l f -f m- PRESS -"imf, DRY i 4 ] 2 . BREACH BBV, jQ.._ SYRTH-SULF-EXTR-FILTER-LVM DSC ODCB BmCH -DIST/L -PRESS-MIX -PACK- 1 -ACTIVESOLV -Hi SYNTH -EXTR-FILTER-LOWA DRY I ' i -SULK D. TCB/ODCS SOLF-EXIR-DIST/L-PRESS -MAX? PACK \- \ t l l -- -ACTIVE- ( /> I1 - t~ -'* ----\ - SOLV - %\ - SELF- EXlS-miL-Tlim-mPACK -SYNTH- . 7. V)I %f 1 ! ACID -SWELL- DEYEL j!S. _n SYNTH-EWR-FILTER - LVWA DRY. ii 1 .' i i AS* ^ MILL % SYSTH-SOLE-EXTR- F/L7ER - LUWA 'DRY, PREtm rMm -DmLCPPBSSfMxEMCK *.-* r\^~ ' ' ' I I i II I i 1 I IT ` DUP050109024 !i PREACHING V\IA1 p i: i ! 1 H1 1i Ii . -o i- > /xr T\ p l t ir 1 ;!! : i . ...... -- : ti t 21A. SYNTH -SULF-BVR - FILTER - L.um CRY : PREM1LL - BREACH -'blSPL -PRESS-MX 'PACK _ ODCB: 1 '. ' i ( muWi i ; mLCaB k ?n 1 sYN771 r-SVlE-EXm.-F1L72:R-LULt/4 CR'Y'\ i ftmm.LABR^RHzD/,577 !. ' ! L z FFE. S-.itr S_ -M \IX -PficK. ] . : Li . ...l ; -i ' . IZ q.S1i PYPNEMWIL-LS' IB-URLEFA-CBH: C+| R2/-57H77/LT-PCRREP-WS-//M}/**'A. ' . Cieft\ - CTP'-Ai l i | i SYNt H-SULT-BCif.iAh o ? -LUW/l CRY 1 PREfOILl -BRep k h -D/s;7L -PJCSS ZDRKR i SJ 9 j i ). i Li 1 1 i ! i] -- -- -- --- -- --- ... i [1 L- - 1 i j ir*^-- - --_> DUP050109025 i I 3-- t RM i/dwi I .MILL j -o ....r .. NO. m, BOOK. WILLS NEW. .OPER .VALUE .INV.1 LABOIL. INVEST. . PRE1 SOLV_(feBiBiFj .1 135 176 380 } I 40 1453. j OA ;ii3 e 129! m 1r64i 1331 i 3 194 127 69 J !. j29 1 16681 o;4__ii3 >| k 26 J931 _0 ii 636 4 209 76 .415 ! .1 m 123 76 1406 '' ! t 23 2324. "0 .0. 23 "2326" 0 A 1136 1136 1>4 108 62 '333 1$ .1860. 500 i 7 156 106 62 326 19 .I860 6. . 500 k- 8 140. i -1 126 6! 81 i{ 5351 I 9 Mb 66 .335 ! *i j i 25 .29 A "0 X>M J35 0_ _ 131. I 130 68 ii j 328.. :1 27 .1898. .OilS 1 rj 636 124" 130 68 322' ij i 27 1898 078 .0. w :i l 636 .131 m .75 .340. .2303^ "ojaUx 505 -I ] i ! I I! 24 135 175 '334' 27 2303' I 0 '905 DUP050109026 / PLP PLANT PPN0T00 5. 0TTA0N/N0 0SN. ... .............. ~9. ANNPPL/4 M/ULN0 7Z.P00PP&PN PLANT PPN0 ,, 6. 7. 0YNTNP0/0. <3___...LOO ZOG______XO0 ::______ , N8S/Q AL/LL,, C04T __L -400 / / rtWT________ DUP050109027 DUP050109028 DUP050109029 DUP050109030 D- ,.l. MILL COST PEFEA/DS. 1! WHAT YOU WAKE- HOW' You WAKE' IT HOW MUCH You MAKE. )i 9 wf/rr\ E$Pt You mke_/r i ! n : l' ! 1 . i i ' ' You mkE ir HowJOAM PEOPLE, Ma k e /T. WHAT ELSE USES 's AmEA E0>rtj A\i fill How. DU P050109031 APPENDIX III 12 RAW DATA WORE SHEETS DUP050109032 I DUF050109033 DUP050109034 DUP050109035 s| /, Jr..':: i :!j Si ?i to! '-: i ! :- ? : "*1 . ^. ' .9 ?g| to? 1 i 4 .SXwj i sw |T a s *evt' 3 1 t s (3 =k 1 8 *# s * 3i s tt*A apWp: & "S [ w IS it j ** | & k tvm I 8i 2 i ~ri tL i [_ ;! *| !1 Se :fe i si $ Ii ]| i. i! | ;i - ;. j ! 1 11, | !i; I \i ' `:- ;:i'| ; ' i 1 ' i- ___ _ :I [ !! ; i.l.n. i8 llil ill .sif sS I I* I DUP050109036 > v , ' 4 a ; * i " j. T* *CDr * L $T :i i ' r r * *; r fr ? :. ' gfegg.g ~*o''r:i-f'&dojAt $ J rr hr r r i . j. j n J >j* t;j"i1t i ~1 Q "i 1rf~ ss*|!! T1 k gwaaif i \ 1 1 ;i] T _i ji i\ Si^gSi f; J I1 3 I ~%t"\>_i j j t ? : i 1l .I i `if : i jl JJ j j J_j j ' 1 ] _ j J -;ji ] 3piiy J J! i!j j j i J1 \ ! , : :; j.; jfeja 1 aSaEr -J I W*T 1 *1 i j ! -- ": ij 1s' 1 1 - ) 's !j | !Mi *,H: j iJ! !;! r>:rt3(v' J3ti? 1' ' i' I .i \ 1 j1 ; -*Jj* -1? 41. 1 liSII4 t F..T Li i . ?- tfr/Bit! Im I lir I Iil i IIIill ,;?LsSw| i .lH"t'" mmMum t L jjm-Jj UwTm. 1!miia !Emmrug_ <k..: i m ...U i--L 1 I7* $%i>stj jf^fc *3gjza* aSjjlzdiil iijj *. 3 5 ** s II! !!il DUP050109037 A DUP050109038 DU P050109039 WORKS DU P050109040 WORKS is I v>[ % H ill s*i&i DU P050109041 DUP050109042 M. h iii h:l Sp PSB ,j| ItyiM r,VmdW jf* > i hh HI* ' X t - i|j > *5 ,, 33 I | > ^8 iS |S ' 3% I :m -1.pt-WMFfSSP ` !4--4*^riW ; b4 _ i. . :___ * la x it .;? <Wv . H^grstes HPI n fw jf' pgr? ri j5 ti Ifn -t ! | i , i ----r iv ; I '!j :ii ]1: r (;i r", 4i i 15 I* si 1 .j i*j? IT 1 i * Mil! J_ is Vl& s is *4 s ' j i*i r iS 3 St [ill i& .1.1 1 L IS ! , F4 i rW i* 1ft 440. -p[K,|8- : SS u jOtt s . *tr e.*,.': : & Nt. it j ! | <* | S l X I sk : : m g r*:, 0- ai'Sr s 'iHjjg >. sr ?i hi t si *S l l Ll i ?F i ' !i | i i i r . r; i a ff i; 3 it I 5 fc % l { 7r OPZXi Oi:l' s & -BS S ' Stodf: s _ jrt EW& 0 p f 'liSSr `3& 5 S'. s s s' S'. ? $ .. Sf `<-.>1 DUP050109043 DUP050109044 im. 0 $ T nr EIt N* k * ` -- "* m. * nih" r[_ "nr* r ? f. [ 5 [ t ,* T E I 1U j1!j:Rtg$11$'|M.t=s?s5mm?jsama2c!?>*8j8;l>*fVi1J[":::i'9-V'.V***t*S.W*Ve0mwVwfn*iJ*^S<1WWULU^*tW**S*5**P.*Mm**/#*M**w*d4***i*Sf5**4Sti;:1s.1.i.AETrN.l_i3;$,il[tiI11J|JI?|, HUmji3111iT-|3tTf*i1N|rtT*r2jiitIi||l~1Lsei1.i'|LT15j|1S" tSIiHi1rlj_*jiiirE_I.eV*S*|mJjJ"1m1jnJ1I[mi'1II::j\rT\MjrjN_.N~lNJj',1r!CirTIiI,r4;_^Tl:ti1j:ri|;:;M-NLJ_.''i:j1rr[!;:I'1i"jhinr_Uini!L iilm1/1lmm5fM1I!$ISnifi1!Ei11?I!fi1i il^;.,;..M1.4 ],.i.^J.U ! ! r : i: i| 4Ei`|lfij1;l1'ji1-~#jf^jrjririp-U,m^rSTlpSWsHpSfhspSMffljifS*1jjPij*Ml:.;!iLi!I**tEmlIfp"U|lMpEMfhSjLihiu^H#.. -|.MNiji.iI-!llw.*;Jl:>^1MjtiaII\*'n.*Snl1.ji**t.**N-~\Lhr|r~,,j:i|i_f?imsj.m\lrL'~*+F,:'=->-1TP=T"Sj-- .F.Ir.i--NH1~nT)iji>rf^li;|;rT[lj];(j- 1 1y i; IIS li l if g; iiV \ l 21 fitl* I * 1u 2emi il 2l Lit f1 i gi M 3 i i -* s li*isltI DUP050109045 DU P050109046 DUP050109047 DUP050109048 ON i33HSAKTU 31VQ [ SNOM DUP050109050 5SJSSSBB3 DU P050109051 DU P050109052 WORKS I DUP050109053 s. - :sf :; f < E S ;[ iv'l|l fit *** -_I -ilM" . 1 -n< P 11. **j w| mo Ki iMftl " MM . *j <*v*lf sj -- **>j. #>l{ .miwti (4| rr< m| Wh-Jft i *#**>8 4W oMj %+m | Oil***** W[-W . 1* l*****f 8 ** ei > t fpS Sisja i *- h s a 1 j f1l 1 i } : *!J : ' i fia (J I *i i 1 !_Li _ ; i m2 ;:ii 1 *,;! ' m ; liia = ! 1 ! *! i M ! ii r> 5 1 - i j ) ft5 "if 11j J i i 4i ifr*Hr w <ki r_rii & 42ft i i *1 4 JjL3 -1 J -54-~jqtfc t-4- i i fi4 !-4 ~ 5* ;1 iff 5 1, l|U e h e ri- j V. ^____L-U-3___ [^i4i4i4aL s s f s * it f fi t< feif|f E ijjl.l : s 'g-1 iigteifili W&w* (53!5K?SES*^21S3B DU P050109054 13 DISTRIBUTION 1. E. Gonick/J. G. Ishikawa/Newark Library ^ Jaffe/Circ. & File*/ 2. E, E. 3* Newport Library-'/ 4, W. S. Struve/B. H. Perkins/J. P. Galvin/A. U 'fA . Smith /Library 5- H. Matrick/Ai'JR. Hanke/J. Jackson 6. N. J. Kane 7, C. W. Anderson/Newport Library .8 J. F. Maurer/W. H. Sevems/Newport Library 9. E. J. Mead 10, R. B. Wetzel 11, L. R. Valencourt 12. W. L.. Monson 13. P. A, Wriede 14. C, E. Rick/C. E. Stevenson 15. P. H. Griswold/W. E. Miller/R. D. Nelson 16. R. J. Guschl/D. J. Gilliland/D. C:. Dakin 17. G. M. Loughran IS. Numerical File 223.4 19. Newark Library for Central Report Index 20, Newark Library for Central Report Index 21. Extra .22 Extra 23. Extra DUP050109055 Return to! CDP Depit.' r^T^' 5 Jackson Laboratory ' ' l R S D. Pile Room , . | - Return to-}' '' COP Dept " Jackson Laboratory . R. & D, File Room TO:____________ Return tor CDP Dept. Jack:oi Laboratory R. 4 D. File Room TQ:_ ;ryP. Return to CDP Per* rt'nVi.Wr Return to.- MU-1780 IReA 3/7fl! CDP Dept. ' Jackson Laboratory RAP. File Room DUP050109056