Document 8O33nyg4jBerwj0v1051aNBxm

Dear ECHA As to European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Regulation Draft (published on Februar In the electric heaters manufactured by our company, namely, self-regulating heate The proposed regulations is just similar to the debate over whether to continue or s Nuclear power has outstanding performance.it is considered necessary for human b A series of regulation proposal by ECHA is just close to that is. However, it is clear Again, I have to say, "it is clearly wrong to target all organic fluorine compounds." Could you review again? I do judge that the proposed regulation will weaken European Economy, inevitably. ublished on February 7th 2023), I have to say that the proposed regulations are too crude. Who decid elf-regulating heaters, it is not a substitute for fluoropolymer. As to proposed regulations, we are able ther to continue or stop nuclear power generation. cessary for human beings because of its efficiency, however, on the other hand, the dangers associa However, it is clearly wrong to target even fluoropolymer. oo crude. Who decided to impose strict regulations even on fluoropolymers? What you are doing is cl ulations, we are able to mention that the alternative material was considered by a person who had no he dangers associated with its operation must be eliminated at all costs for survival of mankind. t you are doing is clearly wrong, in other words, just failure, just mistake, just blunder and etc. person who had no knowledge of electric heaters. Could you please let me speak directly with the pe val of mankind. nder and etc. k directly with the person in charge who considered the alternative product?