Document 88oYoOv9BoaavLJnK32YYgDm
FILE NAME Quigley QUIG
DATE 1937 DOC QUIG003
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Internal Report
ewer SGecone
N VLAG VLAG
For Sleteman said to me that the composition of Insuing
as ve manufactured shortly after the Power Show was approximately
as follows
weight 3530 per cent by
oF e
e
e
.
Asbestos wo
*)
hf
ad
of white Cement
of Insulbrix Dust
a
Clay
*
January 20 1937 I screened out 860 grams of a mixture containing
Gement insulbrix dust and bloat X --- at the same time I
obtained 265 grams of short fibre asbestos
The total mixture weight grams this was taken from a bag of
Insulag brought to the laboratory by Mr. Spillane which was marked
38 pounds per cu.ft. Therefore the amount of asbestes used was
22.6 par cent of the Insulag mixture
I mixed the 860 gramo of cement bloatx with
43 grams of long fibre asbestos slightly more than 5 per cent of
the total mix by weight
This now seems to be too much asbestos
Then mixed with water I noted the following
1. It is a little sare difficult to mix
It 2.
3
does
not muut sold celet in 36
set in 12 hours sufficient fer
hours sufficient for handling
4a . ong
6 *
fibre
asbestos can not may not be
be used classed
in
as
* with the first Insulag
the uigley ^ a moldable mixture would
& near perfect Insulblex with less difficulty
hand
um
-
make
In the old powdered coal game I learned to change one thing
at a time if it did not work I could change it back But if
somene changes two things at once to make an improvement chances
of success tamil tamil establishing the first c^ nditionsby
changing back were improbable
Insumal deawig The block of
the 5
th per cent Asbestos is now in the furnace
was being was It
placed in the furnace 40
dried a 200 hours after it
long fibre
for four hours
molded
ad
091982 091982
wane] Soo rewauviua 6
The screen salgais of the Asbestes used in the Insulag
wei3g 8 ph ouni ds n perg ou ft which iw pillane delivered to the
laboratory January 20 th.1937 is as follows
Yeight 2 grams on 8 mesh saree
a
-
This san not be consider long fibre Asbestos
the
The acco mar de d aci corn dig ng to page No. 131 asing 38 popu er n ou d ft mixture of Insulag removing 22.8 per of the
dust asbestes and replacing it with 5 per cent long fibre
The bleak when set and dried at a maximum of 500 to 600
weighed 34 lbs per ou ft
09 1983
eeeee)] Jeccee
ULAG ULAG
Conference Jun 23 rd 1937 Hessr's Xnete Spillane and Coutant
Mr. Kneta gare the standard mixture for Insulag as follows
By weightweight
27
32427+
per
e
cent
cent
CJ
"
=
of cemeAsnbesttos
fi Clay
" Insulbrix Dusts
To showed Morsers Knote and Vaugh the report of ur Coutant stating
that the Insulag mixture contained 22.6 per cent by weight of Asbestos
Hr Enote washed a sample of the Asbestos sarsened by Hr.Coutant and
said that it appeared to be clean
We Ex screened a sample of the standard Insulag found in the
Gillespie Laboratory and this showed over 22 per cent of Asbestes
Mr. Tough suggested that we go to the Old Bridge plant and mix up
a batch of Insulag for comparison we therefore mixed
20 lbs
45
20 55 " 60
200 id
of Asbestos
* Cfoiane rse Insulbrix
" Camen
CLAY
*"
Insulag mixture
4
weight per cent
5
by
6
10
321
e
*
"
.
.
a
e
2715 2715
This mixture is substantially the same as Mr.Khote Mr.Khote ur
,
Sloteman gn^rsaid were used
We then went to the Gillespie Laboratory where we made a soreen
test by screening out the Asbestos which when weighed showed over
22 per cent It was obvious that s Sfine dust adhared to the
tiny damp fibres of Asbestos THIS ANDLED ANDLED OUR VCTIONFAND
QUOTES THAT THE STANDARD FORNOLA HAD BEEN TOUTTUIS ASING SO
17.
MAY MOT DETRITHIN THE CULTS T JOBTAINED JOBTAINED WITH LONG FIBRS
ASBUSTOG
fo
bre
f
uy how 28?
09 1984
us
Traeavwriua @
MADE WITH S M
ACCORDING TO PAGE 131
CENT
MEDIUM TO LONG FIRMS ASHEST
COMPARATIVE HEAT FLOW
ae
Comparative heat flow using conductivities determined by the
Quigley K.V.Laboratory K.V.Laboratory for Insulbrix 2000 as a base
Testing Insulbrix 2600 weight 37 lbs per cu.ft.
Testing Insulag containg 5 per cent leng fibre Asbestes weight 33 lbs
FORMACIS INSIDE
LEFT SIDE
RIGHT SIDE
TT TT WINTIONED TT TT
1300
1375
1500
1850
1950
1900 2000 2830 2150
2200
water
water water water Water
NO WATER
TT
TT
TT
TT
TT TT TT
TT
TT TT
TT
TT
TT
TT
TT
TT
TT
TT
TT
TT
TT
COMPARATIV TIERIAL CONDUCTIVITIES
CONINCTIVITY IN 31.FT. THICK DEGR == / HOUR
KAN TEMPERATURE
DETERMINATION DETERMINATION
:
DBEDTEERTMIENYRATMIIONNATIONQDUEITEGRLMIITNYATION
0.58
0.70 0.86
DETREMIORATION DETREMIORATION
BY QUIGLEY
INSULAQ
ABOVE
about
0.63
1.05
09 1985
135=-
ULAG
MADE TITH PHA CANT MEDIUM TO LONG PINAK ASCESTOS
ACCORDING TO PAGES 181
134
After tesing for conductivity the sample used shrunk alittle so
that the weight and conductivity increased.from 33 lbs to 37 lbs
Comparative heat flow using conductivities determined by the quigley
N.Y.Laboratory N.Y.Laboratory for Insulbrix 2600 as a base
Testing Insulag fade with 5 per cent long fibre Asbestos weight 37 lbs o
Testing Insulbrix 2600 weight 37 lbs per cu.ft. cu.ft.
FURNACE
18007
1425 1528 1600
1850
1900 2000 2080 2150 2200
The sample
was
LEFT SIDE
INSUPLAG_LTATIUND INSUPLAG_LTATIUND
108 128
143
280 320 408 500 588
675
1/16 th thinner
ABOVE
REIGHT SIDE
= INSUINSULLBRIX INSUBLBRIX R2I60X0
128 180 178 350 400 500 600 700
Comparative Thermal Conductivities
Conductivity
10EAX 10EAX
TEMPLATETI TEMPLATETI TEMPLATETI
OF
DIOPIE in B.T.U.S.FT./INCH B.T.U.S.FT./INCH DIOPI HOE UR
DETERMINATION DETERMINATION
IT NIMATION
DETERMINATION DETERMINATION
BY QUIGKITY
BY WIGHT
PY QUIGLEY
OLD
INSHLBLOX
INQUZAG
INSULAG AS
ABOVE
a
1000
1500
1.THE 2." 3." 4
IN
=" * *
0.99
0.70
2.84 1.16
INSULAG CAN HOT HE USED IN QUIOLIN fi is mere difficult to handle
fi
is not as good insulator
"
will probably cost more
GUN
and mold
2.01 1.32
A NEW
2 2." 3." 4." 5, 6." 7."
INSULBLOX MADE ACCORDING TO THE ABOVE WOULD HE MEAR PERFECT
with low fibre asbemos would weigh 32 lbs per cu.ft.
"
volld have about the same Insulating value as
present
would be Thexible would stand shipment
shipment
"
" if cracked would not break in two pieces but would hang
would be cheaper to manufacture
"
could be made to equal Navy Specifications
"
must be made as the present one after being heated will
slack in air and fall crumble
3."
would be easier to manufacture.nmanufoacturte.not tricky
09 1986
136
It will be so from page 131 that 22.6 per cent of Insulag mixture
was scroe ut we ithn Asbe estd os. It wilble seen from page 153 that test at the Old Bridge plant proved that only 10 per cent short fibre Asbestos was included in
the mixture.
Therefore 12.6 per cent of the material screened out must have
been fine particles which adhered to the tiny fibres of the
Asbestos. It is thought that the final mixture as cast contained
something as follows. Divide the mixture shown on page by three we
have 10 lbs
per 224 26
cent
* 10
% 27+ *
295
30
06*
short
* Fine
Course .
28 add
asbestos
Insulbrix . Cement Clay
dust about
dust.
*
10.
4.8 per
cent
How Insulblaz
+
1
9
/ Py
O lbs
22
*11
id
*
long Asbestos
4. about The percentage by weight at right will serve as a
basis of determining the costs for produca ing of
NEW
INSULBLOX
a Yin
very.
c
49
NO
_
:
t
a
n 1 o
|
: was
-
fe
Dae
High
-
only High only
taught only taught
taught
taught.
9
f
595 * 55
vgs 33.746 ; ; 33.746
.
wat
~
kait kait
327
327 327
09 1987
13740 13740000 00 130 740 0000 00
INSULA
COMPOSITION BY THICHT
24.15 225
of Coarse Insulbrix
grams Dust 100 Fine
...
10.7 29.5 275 *
*
Cement
318 32.25 300
-
Medium pe . Medium Length Fibre Asbestos
318 931.5
dat 18 hours waterdried kixed with 600 grams
Allgwed
to
9007
was reached
of water
,
slowly until a temperaturoef
Shrinkage at 900 none
"
1000 None
.
* 1200
Mone
length s
* 1400
tumm.1 nd in a
ins
of .
" 1500
7 1500
1/8 then
*
*
*
.
16ths
*
*
"
.
Weight per cu.ft. 39 pounds
Samples dried and burned are rather sandy probable due to the short
period of time allowed for cold setting aise the strength likewise
has been impaired
09 1988
-- 158-
158-
>
& INSULAG INSULBLOX
MADE WITH LEHIGH HIGH EARLY STRENGTH GRAY PORTLAND
->EMKOIT
260 grams
Insulbrix 110
290
*
of gearse Fine
fi Lehigh
dust per cent vy weight 26
e
fi
115
Early
a!
29
High Cement 285
*
" MonoClay
os
Asbestos 2815 4.9 fi
" Indium Long Fibre
8
"
49 be
a
s
AL
s
.
2
998 4.9 Mixed with 750 grams of water 75 per cent by weight
Allowed to sold set 72 hours
Dried at 950
Trimmed and weighed 32 pounds per cu.ft.
The long fibre added little to the appearance
The Gray cement worked equally as well and came out almost VNITE
Placed in furnace with one and exposed to the air the same
as might be found in practice the inside end was coated
Insulith was heated to 1900 or 1850 " no
with
Sample handed to Mr. dgley to day February 2nd.1937
INSULITH INSULITH INSULITH
Silicate of Soda into which is mixed fine powdered Insulbrix dust to a paste consistancy in which state it can be put in cans like Hytempite and sold
When used it should be mixed with about 25 per cent
by volume of hot water for a surface coating Mix 50 per cent of hot water and pour over perfaces if it is desire to add strength to the surface particularly concrete which may have
become sandy of dusty because of heating to 1800 Used in this manner it actually increases the strength of the artikle
treated
09 1989
--139
Insulith applied to Insulblox sprayed on of applied with brush
will dry in one after which time Insulag can applied
the water in the Insulag will not be absorbed into the Insulblex
_
best
therefore will expand and acquire maximum thickness and consequently
greatest insulating properties
pe
aa
This idea is not new because Hytempite has been recomen
for coating brick and other surfaces to prevent water being absorbed
when Refract or Insulerete is poured or molded over
dry surfaces
The Innovation of INSULINE products demands a similar
material to Hytampite to be used repairs Quigley gun
for general purposes 2kexxmmexen
for
applications used hot or cold surfaces
Insulith composition can be developed to meet this necessity
NEW GRAY INSULAG AND INSULBLOX
FEB 2- 1937
using
100
Short Fibre Asbestos
per cent by weight of
with Lehigh
water
High Early
.
Strength
Cement
Composition
by
weighk
225 100 275 300 100
grams
(* * " =*
4 "
1,004 "
of Coarse Insulbrix Dust
"
Fine
19
"
"
Lehigh Early Stg.Cement
" Line Clay
* Short Fibre Asbestos
"
AL
Composition
2244 10 %
271 ot8 rd
30 % 10 %
0.4
0.4
Water
1,000 gramS
Expansion 60 per cent in one hour
Probable weight per cu.ft. 30 lbs
Used as Insulag or Insulblox probable coverage in thick
per 100 lbs of Composition 40 suare feet
Cee ee ee ey
Insulag is a 100 per cent better Insulator that Vermiculite 0 Fla
etc. Vermuculite covers lb Insulag initial cost
70 is
sq.ft.
80 per
per 100 lbs therefore same price
cent that of Vermibulite.etc
per
09 1990
Ct ak ae
& INSTEAD
INSULBLOX
February 7th. 19576
te Insulag
Insulag Insulblex Insulblex amcadceording tofoforrmmuullaa byMr.Mnote when mix mixe ed md ixed with 100 accordaci corndigng weight
W7 Mr.Mnote
allowed
vena air set week then dried cent furnace 800 though completely weighed weighed lbs.13 lbs.13 es ote f furnace
prepertics
completely
value cu.ft. insulating
when When tested insulating
insulating insulating properties
per greater greater than competitive
and sustains sustains the
100 100
established for Insulag
insulating insulating already
is mich are
than
those
used
Insulblex
Because
Insulag
Insulag
better better
new now according according the same formala
Mr.Quigley Copy Copy
then
MaPudden
Gischel
1991 1991
INSULAG mi BLOX
xxredden
Gischell
Mr. Sletaux received from Hr Knete split sample of INSULELAX
as they are now mmfactured This was weighed and tested for thermal
conductivity The result are se remarkable that thissiyum my be held
sales
that which was handed to you
in reserve for date
data use
revised today showed on pages 108 ^ 109 Feb. 11 th 1957
HEAT
FLOW
COMPARATIVE flow
using
conductivities
determined
by
the
The comparative heat
quigley
Testing
Testing
FURNACE
K.Y. Laboratary for Insulbrix 2600 as a base
Insulbrix 2600 w^'ghing37 lbs per
32
Insulag and Insulblex weighing
LEFT SIDE
cu.ft.
lbs perRIGHT
Scu.IftD. E
INSIDE
moisture
125
.
1,400
fi
150 160
150 300
1,450
bows woes 4
200
400
1,720
270
500
1,900
360 450
600 700
2,040 2,120
540 625
800
2,200
665
350
2,340
TESTED AT 2340 AND MAINTAINED INSULATION
NOTICE INSULAG AND INSULBLOX
PROPERTIES
COMPARATIVITY THERMAL THERMAL CONDUCTIVITIES
CONDUCTIVITY IN 3.T.U./SQ.FT./INCH BEGREE / HOUR
MEAN
DETOFMINATION DETOFMINATION
DETERMINATION
DETERMINATION
DETERMINAT
1.90
1.500
2.10
Service Temp
0.86 114
2,200
recomended as good
1,800
insulaters as
85
near 1800
magnesia and
INSULAG & therefore
INSULBLOX are should be recomended for low
better insulating
temperature Insulation properties that Varmiculite
block
and
alse 100 per cent
cent better insulator than Supered
better Tahnder3m7Fpler akceent2b0etter better than Eagle 66 OTHERS MENTIONED ARE NOT INSULALOX ARE DURABLE THERE room conditions Superex living
I8N5SULMAaGgnAeNsiDa desintegrates under each application of
temperature begins to shrink and weaken with Vermiculite will not
Eagle
Insulations are very fragil
stand raper
steam or water they
INSULAQ AND INSULELAX HAVE A THERMAL FIRE BRICK FOR SAME INSULATING EFFECT
HEAT STORAGE COMPARED WITH
APPROXIMATING 1/08 th,
09 1992
ewe) dS-~e
I USED OVER INSULALOX
HR J.MES J.MES
Ooples to WaRnen
It has been found that when Insulag is plaster 1945
Insulb that the Inculag will not expand because the Insulblem
absorbe the water tes quickly
little pa
Insulag en Insulben there is
or no expansion
^" there is lLorever a geed bond and set
Insulag Insulag plaster Insulblem that had previously been
seated uniterial uniterial taken vith brown
from ur quigley
not improved expansion expansion very afte aftr er
drying there was no bond
3. Insuing plaster Insulbox that had previously been coated with a tin mixture of sodium siliosate cod
Inculbris dust was no better than number we
4.
Insulag plustered on Insulblox that and previously been
well souted with a witorial prepared by F. hote
and labeled Dentonite the water to be absorbed
by the Inculblem and there was little ag ne Improvement
The matter of bonding Insulag to Insulblem is one that
requires more study and should be done soon because Inculeg plaster over Inculblox will not be a reed inculator nd to coverage will be roduced one third
09.1993
655
665
670 675 680 685 890 695 700
.5600 .5600 .5614 - 5628 .5648 .5656
.5684 .5698 .5712 .5726 .8740 .5754 .5768 .5782 .5782 .5798 .5798 .5810 .5884 .5884 5838 5852 5868 .5880 .5894 .5908 .5922 .5922 .5936 5950 .5984 .5978 .5992 .6006 8020 .6034 .6048 .6062 .6078 .6090 .6104 .6118 .6138 .8148 .6180
F
tayee
Og P F F
F F
,
800 805 81.0 815 820 823 830 835 . 840 845 850 855
865 870 875
*
880 885 890 895 900
F. F.
F F
F F
By
7 Pa F agp F F F F F F
F
F
F
F F F F F F. F F F
9050 F.
F 910
915
920
F 925
935
P 940
945
950
P 955
F 965
970
975
980
F 985
990
995
1000
1005
1010
1015
F 1020
1025 1030 1088
1040 F
1045 r
1050 1055
F
F 1060
1065
1070
1075 F
1080 F
1085 P
1090 F
1095 1100
F
.8734 .8748 .6768 .8776 .6790 .6790 .6804 .6804
8 813 .8882 .8882
6846 .6860 .8874 .8888 .6902 6916 .6980 .8944 .6958 .8979 .8979 .8988
.7028 .7042 .7056 .7056 .7070
.7084 .7093 .7093
.7128 .7128 .7140
.7154 .7188
.7188
.7196 .7210
.
.725
.7260
.7880
09 1994
INSULAG I FACTOR
Page 2
1105 1110
1115
. 1120
1125
1180
1135 1140
1145
1150
1155
1160
1165 1170
1180
1185
1190
1195
P
.7294
'
.7388 .7388
F
.7886
F .7364 .7364
F
.7378
.7398 .7406
F
.7420
F
.7434 .7448
F
F
..774746 76
| F
.7490
F.
.7518
F
.7582
F
.7546
1805 1210 F
1215 F 1220 F 1220 P 1830 F 1235 F 1240 F 1245 F 1250 F 1255 F 1260 F 1265 F 1270 F 1275 F 1280 F 1285 F 1290 F 1295 F 1800 F
.7574 .7588 .7602 .7616 .7830 .7644 .7658 .7672 .7686 .7700 ..7714 .7728 .7742
.7756
.7770.7770
.7784 .7798 .7812 .7826 .7840
1305 F
1810 bay
1315 1380 1325
Oey Og F
1550
P
1831835 5 F
1340 fey 1845 tay 1350 ay
1355 F
1360 ng
1305 F
F 1800
1875
1380 hag
1385 tag
1890 F
1395 F
1400 F
1405 F
1410 F
1415 F
1420 1425
F
1430 F
1435 F
1440 F
1445 F
1450 F
1455 1460 1465
F F F
1470 F
1475 F
1480 F
1485 1490
F
1495 1500
F
. .7854 .7868 .7888 .7896 .7910 .7924 .7924 .7938 .7952 .7966 .7980 .7994 .8008 .8022 .8038 .8050 .8064 .8078 .8092 .8106 | .8120 .8134
.8148 .8162 .8176 .8190 .8204 .8218 .8282 .8246 .8260 .8274 .8288 .8302 .8818 80 .8344 .8358 .8872 .8386 .8400
or
ont
:
io
ea
ey bal
1000
F F
1800
328eight
Brief of 9x2^
328eight NO SHINKAB~
SHINKAB~ ^
2413
413
413
\ i}
Efter SHRINK SHRINK 93 23 6x43 6x43 y
158 1158 1158 1158
146 146 14oz
09 1995
INSULKBL FAO CTX OR
Nean
Loup.
500F
505 510 515 580 SOB S30
335
540 545 550 555 560 585 570
575
580 585 590 595 600 605 610 615 620 628 630 635 640
Various Temperatures
Temperatures
Factor
Mean
Factor
Mean
k_.| Tap Factor
.790 .792 .794
.796
.798
| 775 F 780 785 790 795
.900 .902 .904 .906 .908
1055 F
=| 1060
1085
= 1070
: 1075
.800 .802
800 808
.910 .912
+= 1080
, 1085
.804
810
.914
1090
.808
815
.918
1095
.808 .810
| 820
=
825
.918
.920
1100
1105
.812
=: 830
.922
1110
Factor
_
1.0087 1.0104 1.0121 1.0138 1.0155 1.0172 1.0189 1.0208 1.0223 1.0240 1.0257
1.0274
| 1355
1365
: 1370 : 1375
.816
| 840
.926
1120
1.0308
1385 1390
'
.820 .822 .824 .820 .828 .830 .832 .834 .836 .838 .840 .842 .844 .848 .848 .850 .852
.954
.850 .858 .860 .882 .864 .866 .868 .870 .872 .874 .876
850 855 860 885 870 875 880 885 890
895
900 905 910 915 920 925 930 935 940 945 950 955 980 985 970 375 980 985 1990
1.930 1.930
.932 .934 .936 .938 .940 .942 .944 .946 .948 .950 .952 .954 .956 .958 .960 .962 .964 .266 .968 .970 .972 .974 .376 .978 .980 .982 .982 .984 .986
1130
1135
1140 1145 1150 1155
1160
1165 1170 1175
1180
1185 1190 1195 1200 1205 1210 1215 1220 1225 1230 1235 1240 1245 1250 1255 1260 1265 1270
1.0342 1.0359 1.0376 1.0393 1.0410 1.0427 1.0444 1.0461 1.0478 1.0495 1.0512 1.0529 1.0546 1.0563 1.0580 1.0597 1.0814 1.0631 1.0648 1.0865 1.0682 1.0699 1.0716 1.0733 1.0750 1.0767 1.0784 1.0801 1.0818
1395
1405 1410 1415 1420 1425 1430 1435
"
1440 1445
11446550
1460 1465 1470
|
1475 1480 1485 1490 1500
.880 .882 .884 .886 .888
.890
.892 .894 .898 .898
1005 1010 1015
1020 1025
1030
= 1035
1040
1045
1050
.9917 .9934 .9951 .9968 .9985
1.1.00019 019
1.0038
1.0058 1.0070
1280 1285 1290 1295 1300
'
1305
1310 1315
1880
1.0852 1.0869 1.0888 1.0903 1.0920 1.0937
1.1.0954 0954 1.0971 1.0988 1.0988 1.0988 1.0988
Faster
1.1005 1.1082 1.1839 1.1056 1.1073 1.1080 1.1107 1.1124 1.1141 1.1158
1.1175
1.1192
1.1209
1.1226
1.120
1.1260 1.1277
1.1294 1.1311 1.1328 1.1345
1.1362
1.1379 1.1398 1.1418 1.1430 1.1447 1.1466 1.1481 1.1488 1.1515 1.1582 1.1549 1.1566 1.1583
09 1996
4,068
2.28
2.00 | lease
.78
48* ' ae"
o5Q* ozs"
oa?
|
19"
error
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
80587 .
6.5" 5.6
:
| 3.8
3.2
; 4.0
fae
|
3.2
2.6
| cae
1.68
=i 2.5
1.0
| as
60*
2.88
2.4 1.05 Le 1.15
238"
.58 35"
1.95
1.00
| 1.3
1.008
if
me
53"
822
were
| 1.4
| 1.18
| Se
a
1.08 .85
ase ie we
.23
a: es
| .180
| ar. .19
|
ue |e
-
09 1997