Document 85LYrD9Na0wKLj1G7E4YkKwXZ
PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT
ST0282405
ROBERT N. SAWYER, M.D. OUTLINE: ASSESSMENT
1. ASSESSMENT CONSIDERATIONS
LOCATION
POPULATION BEHAVIOR
ACCESSIBILITY
CONTROL ALTERNATIVES
CONDITION
PRIORITY
OTHER FACTORS COST
2. CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
FRIABILITY
FRIABLE
NONFRIABLE
INTERPRETATIONS
APPLICATION
SURFACE TREATMENTS
THERMAL SYSTEM INSULATION
OTHER MATERIALS
REPLACEMENT
WASTE
QUANTITATION SQUARE FEET, METERS
LINEAL FEET, METERS
UNITS
5. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS
SAMPLING ANALYSIS
APPLICATION
METHOD
REGULATIONS LABELLING
PATTERN
CUSTODY
METHODOLOG^taOE^-
iLAaBoOnRoAATTOnRoYv r(RaTmI) QAP SYSTEM -f PA
S,
DISPOSITION
RETENTION DOCUMENTATION
-JS'Sto-te ^
4-9
PAGE TWO
outline/assessment
4. MATERIAL ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES
Jl" i^MT.
POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY (PLM) cUZfJLuMA
X-RAY DETRACTION (XRD)-c4^ dkloWl
U&l ft/Y1 "
MICRc3rTI&JLATE TECHNOLOGY1 ^
- (e^
^ ib ^
i
Ref: Rohl RN, Langer AM, Wylie AG,. Mineral Characterization of A4>estoa-Con-
taining Spray Finishes. EPA: A Guidance Document, Part JL
5. POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPE (PLM) AND X-RAY DIFFRACTION
.6 RTI QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM [QAPJ- l`Ke
RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE o.6-m. uyj tl RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK
a.4<jUg
NORTH CAROLINA 27709.
TELEPHONE: 800-334-8571
items'-
7. DUST SAMPLING METHODOLOGIES
. fV-orb - ,u.^k_ tt) tt'-'LCMrv^viL-
8 COMMON ASSESSMENT METHODS
StiA
U
AIR SAMPLING
RATING SYSTEMS MATRIX METHOD EPA GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS CONSULTATIONS
9. BASIC ASSESSMENT PROBLEMS NO DEFINITIVE EXPOSURE STANDARD
CO -H
O ro co
ro
F"
O CT>
MEASUREMENT PROBLEMS
MISINFORMATION
10. AIR SAMPLING METHODOLOGIES
CD PHASE CONTRAST MICROSCOPY
OSHA 1910.1001
PACAM 239<75S6ft2BM
OSHA 1926.58 tk. pivi^c^do --A,0 (k
cA L -t'G >W l0u <,
^4/vLctC.to Hj.
V ' SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY (SEM) -,5
TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY (TEM) *
0
tefs
*ud**^
'\&C$
4-10
ST0282407
PAGE THREE
OUTLINE/ASSESSMENT
11. COMPARISON OF AIR SAMPLING METHODOLOGIES
Standard protocols
PCM
/^PACAM 239 ( PACAM 7400 \ORM_____
SEM
None accepted
TEM EPA VOYKjUz SFfcflLfiJ provisional
Laboratory assessment
Proficiency An alytical Test ing (PAT)
None
None
Cost range, per sample
$25-50
$50-300
$200-600
Availability Most available
Less available than PCM
Less available than PCM
Time, prepara- 1 hour tion/analysis
4 hours
4-24 hours
Time, turn around
6 hours
6-24 hours
2-7 days
yn Sensitivity:
Vukc
best foi5 um \
typical
0.05 um 0.20 um
^0025umy W
Specificity
Collection filters
Not specific for asbestos
0.8-1.2 um cellu lose ester
More specific
Definitive forJ
than PCM but -aabestoe-lLcvel
not definitive
m-TEM with "
for asbestos
EDXA A SAED)
(SEM with EDXA) h> i k-t/Lvciuts
0.4-0.8 um polycarbonate best, 0.B um cellulose ester also used
0.4 um polycarcaibonate, or 0.8 um cellulose ester if organic contam inants present
12, AIR SAMPLING: PROBLEMS FIBER AERODYNAMICS TECHNOLOGIES OF MEASUREMENT
D*
4-11
ST0282408
'^U^ud /cU-tou^c-I^jia^l!?
V)n (^A^yoIXMa-JLj
uv SLiAjjtju^j
ktfKj^ OJXtk. fKXX'U^yv'J^^ <^U>a
~
, tuyf" ^
ltfn,- Ai^ CXh*/^ ^X^Lvvv_y
PAGE FOUR
OUTLINE/ASSESSMENT
13. USES OF AIR SAMPLING
+0 -fo ^/c(c u_p
(\\ASSESSMENT OF CONTAMINATION PCM, TEM-i+t)^ ^ lluAt
& DOCUMENTATION OF CONTROL '1*^ PCM, TEM
l Q'
(3) MONITORING DURING ABATEMENT PCM -oSM >Ut,CL gi PERSONNEL MONITORING (OSHA)------ PeM-~~_,v AJUAju \^rf\ - 0
^ 14. RATING SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS WUu>\/U<jJ{
QUANTITATION
DATA COLLECTION COMMUNICATION
PRIORITY RANKING
u.Ul/ T
"C
ST0282409
ESTIMATION
FACTORS CONTAMINATION POTENTIAL
ADVANTAGES
PREDICTIVE AIR DATA DEFICIENCIES
LIMITATIONS
SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION OBSERVER VARIABILITY
15. MATRIX CONCEPT (BASIC)
PRIORITY FACTORS
CONDITION/DAMAGE
.d STRUCTURAL LOCATION
INTACT TO SEVERE
cr^- USER CHARACTERISTICS
AND SCOPE OF WORK
w-V REGULATORY, LEGAL
Si \Y\ ~
' oUjHc
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS^
1-vUiAifW - oU.K
CLASSFICATION BY APPLICATION ARCHITECTURAL DEFINITION SURVEY PARAMETERS CONTAMINATION POTENTIAL- ^Ct^uJUt
INVOLVED POPULATIONS CONTROL METHODS AND COST
/wA<3> (hULt
c-c^r CcYJVr^t'H-'C-C^
17. MATRIX ASSESSMENT EXAMPLES: THERMAL SYSTEM INSULATION
10. EPA GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS | 4SraNGE BOOKS 1979 (1984) -
C.U?.
TAP
<5^^ BLUE BOOK
1983' Cfr)Y^nS.A. o.Jf. Ca vtL&JL "
$0 c^4 k
PURPLE BOOK
1985 -
Op WLul
^L-N- Jlilctb Ijss t-ftv Weii-dfL'O.*--
4-12
ST02824l0
(VM^A - a/t^Y t^fJTK^
qC?- (T)
pfifr '
(g)
hudUU^fJ s.U^cL*JU-
,
/>A
t>W.
r\
(5),
A^AyruJe^'
C?-2>
)
(m) fJ^VA-rvU.^ pA<HH^^v\
'1
~
(Mi /VJLfiJr^ ^0VV*n-^
6^v\ Amx&o
"* ax^uulaXq *~>^-uX^. ^
ULchf^y
PAGE FIVE
OUTLINE/ASSESSMENT
19. SIGNIFICANCE CDF PURPLE BOOK CHANGES COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP -uAc^idJidl
DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION STATEMENT ON PRESENCE MANAGEMENT APPROACH TEM CLEARANCE i/a A^yr^TL-V OyUA^jRm
20. REMOVAL DECISIONS: WHETHER WHEN-C/U-R^lP
CONDITIONS
IRRELEVANT-
PRIORITY SYSTEM CONTROLS
V<Up OH0 A-U*M
1 &JLfMUJI U
21. REMOVALS: SOLE PURPOSE VS INTEGRATED
22. EPA REGULATIONS CHRONOLOGY
40 CFR PART 61^^^^
1973
AMENDMENTS 40 CFR. PART 763
11997788 J> tulkW 1982 -- &MoU ^A
SEIU PETITION AND HEARINGS 1984
UL cUfJL Ln
UyJt Ul
cA^xt^'Xo'k/o
ULoi^''
**
40 CFR 763 SUSPART G 26. OSHA REGULATIONS CHRONOLOGY
1985
0^3^
r*K> /VUz/L-Cc.-f
29 CFR 1910.93 a(1001) Ste'<jT
1972
PROGRAM DIRECTIVE #300-16
1978
EMERGENCY TEMPORARY STANDARD
1983
AMENDED GENERAL STANDARD 29 CFR 1910.1001
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY STANDARD 29 CFR 1926.58- A*c0 i,\
1986 1986 -CS(4X
Xo la
27. CHRONOLOGY OF PEL CHANGES
im
TWA^ ceiling
1972 1910.93 a 1972 1910.93a(.1001)
5.0 10.0 2.0 5.0
Fibers per cubic centimeter of air
1975 PROPOSED
0.5 5.0
1977 NIOSH PROPOSED 0.1 0.5
1983 ETS
0^ 5.0
1986 1926.58
f 0.2^
i
/
co H
O
ro
CD
ro
JT
4-13