Document 7XVr0050gyjOmdE6bJZ7DN0o

FILE NAME: Union Carbide (UC) DATE: 1975 Feb 12 DOC#: UC149 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Memo RE OSHA Medical Exams U C 1-102 c & ; K f > jz INTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE-'^---------------- ----------- --______________________ Ulfc-uiz-o/' JL ^ _ . M INING AND METALS DIVISION r \ -- (o O O 2- ' t y J ^ U { /4I6C2^5BRf Ol VYAAiL AAV\ /EC., Pt>. 0 . nBOn Xv r5i79, N* .I.A* G. *ARA FAILS,''N/ EW YORK, 1430 To (Nam e) D(Diivviissiioonn L o c a tio n Mr. R. E. Byrne . ' Mining and M etals. Niagara F a lls , NY Date Originating Dpt. February 12, 1975 " C a lid r ia " Asbestos - Marketing - TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT C o p y to Mr. W. C. Thurber Dr. H. B. Rhodes A n iw erin g letter date S u b je c t OSHA Medical Exams Per our discussions I talked to Jim Murray concerning the Sub ject andVihow I t a ffe c ts our s a le s , e s p e c ia Ily RG-244. In general he sees nothing wrong with o ffe rin g to pay " f ir s t- tim e " fin es fo r customers a f t e r we have determined th a t airborne concentrations do not exceed 1 flb e r/ c c . He estim ates our maximum exposure would be $1000 per Incident and t h is is highly improbable. For the low concentrations we have experienced and a n tic ip a te .; he does not think there would be anv fin e . 7 However,Jim does not see any real sales advantage and suggests -that we sound out a few "tough nuts" before we tr y to " le g a liz e " anything. | agree w ith th is approach and suggest th a t we determine who wouid be the best p o te n tia ls to co ntact with the " o f f e r . " The o ffe r would have to be presented only as a p o s s ib ilit y u n til we see how i t is received. I f there is any in te r e s t then we w i i I g et Jim to "draw up the papers." A0862 1 UCC 013846