Document 7Rwxg2wQDp8xjZNn3k7Je0ZbR
FILE NAME: Asbestos Information Association (AIA)
DATE: 1976 Sept 8
DOC#: AIA107 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Board of Directors Meeting Minutes & Attendee List with Remarks of the Executive Director
PIMA ASBESTOS INFORMATION ASSOCIATION
NORTH it.MEA4CA 101
1111111111MMINOMINNEW
1660 L Street. N W WohingInn 0 C 20336 1202) 22328 5
BOARD OF DIRECTORS, MEETING September 8, 1976
Stouffer's National Center Hotel
Arlington, Virginia
Pursuant to notice, a meeting ofi the Board of Directors was held September 8, 1976, in Stouffer's National Center Hotel, Arlington, Virginia. The meeting was', called to order at 9:00 A.M.
The following Directors were pre ent:
George Barge Richard Bauer (for W. B.
Hoffman) W. H. Beasley
John H. Chidester William Clark Thomas A. Dougherty William Fassuliotis
James Gilmore (for D. E. Eldred)
John W. Hollingsworth
A. R. Hooker John H. Marsh C. G. Morgan Dimitry Poutiatine J. L. Rainey John Riopelle Martin J, Sendecki D. Tijumelis (for. T. K.
Lindquist) William C. Thurber C. Fred Workman
Atlts Asbestos Company Nat anal Gypsum Company
Cement Asbestos Products Co. Br swick Fabricators, Inc. Asten-Hill Ltd. Certain-teed Corp. GAF`, Corporation Vermont Asbestos Group
Dresser Industries (Magcobar Div.) The Flintkote Company Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. North American Asbestos Corp ? " Johns-Manville Corp. Amatex Corp. The pendix Corp. Congoleum Industries, Inc. Borg-Warner Corp.(Borg & Beck Div.)
Unio1 Carbide Corp. Nic4et, Inc.
Also present: Guy G. Gabrielson, Ur., Nicolet, Inc., Chairman, Asbestos Regulation Task Force; R. H. Mereness, Executive Director, AIA/NA ; A. H. Fay, Past President, AINNA; Richard H. Rosenburg, Borg-Warner Corp.; Joseph A. Artabane,:Esq., Cadwalader, Wickersham
and Taft; Richard T. Davis, Frank C. Frantz & Co.; and B. 3. Pigg,
Administrative Assistant, AlA/NA.
141054
PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT
AIA WL 000001
Page 2
Minutes
On motion, minutes of the preceding meeting, June 10, 1976, were approved as submitted.
Financial Report
Mr. Barge reviewed the financial report far eight (8) month period ending August 31,. 1976. He said that year-end projections indicate expenditures. to be within current budget. (revised budget for 1976 was approved at Board of Directors .meeting June 10, 1976.) He noted that billings far the third and fourth quarters have been adjusted to provide for the current dues rate for 1976 (2.5 mills), which was approved at the March 26 Board. of Directors meeting. As of August 31, the Association. had total assets of $93,660; liabilitie of $48,780 and net worth of $44,880. On motion, the financial report was accepted as submitted.
Mr. Barge stated that the Executive Committee had discussed the matter of conducting an audit ef the Association's financial affairs inasmuch as'one had not been conducted since the inception Of the Association and in view that the AIA/NA accounting firm, Frank C. Frantz ti Co., is not independent with respoect to the . Association: Since the firm bills and receives membership dues-it cannot render an independent opinion on financial statements. Mr. Barge said an audit by. an "outside firm" would cost between $375,000: He said the. Executive Commitee saw no need for an audit but recommended that the matter be brought to the attention of the Beard. Following discussion, and on motion, it was agreed that an independent audit of Association was not needed et this time.
Third Annual Industry-Government Conference
Mr. Thurber gave a report on the upcoming Conference. He. invited attention of OireetorS to the program schedule and prospective attendance list in folders. He said he was pleased to report advanced attendance 'of 150 persons.
Work. in Connection with OSHA Asbestos Standards
Mr. Gabrielson, Chmn Asbestos Regulation Task Force, said that the had been no recent changes in status of OSHA's proposed revision to the asbestos (manufacturing) standard. The Inflationary Impact Statement (IIS) prepared by CONSAD Research Corp. is yet to be "certified" by Department of Labor. He made reference to a June 21 , 1976 meeting in Washington, D. C., with Mr. H.D.S. Hardie, Chairman, Asbestos Information Committee (U.K.). Mr. Hardie has been most helpful to the Associaton throughout our response to OSHA process and supplemental data from Turner Brothers Associates (TEA) is expect shortly which will be forwarded to OSHA in refutation of the "new evidence" cited in the proposed revision to the asbestos standard concerning exposure experience at a TBA factory. Mr. 'eabrielson said that Mr. Norman Rhodes and Dr. Steve Holmes, of TBA will be available to testify at public hearing on the proposed standard. Mr. Jerry Hebb, project director for the AIA/NA techno-
141055
AIA WL 000002
Page 3
logical feasibility and economic impact study conducted by Roy F. Weston, Inc., now employed by the Gulf Oil Corp. will also be available to testify.
Mr. Gabrielson recalled at the June 10, 1976 Directors meeting the issue of seeking an injunction against OSHA to force a delay of the manufacturing standard until a:regulation for the construction industry is promulgated had been raised by Johns-Manville Corp. He emphasized that consolidation of the proceedings for the two standards was the primary recommendation of the AIA/NA response with regard to the proposed revision to the asbestos manufacturing standard which was submitted to OSHA )kpril 9, 1976. Mr. Gabrielson explained that the Association's initial response to the J-M suggestion had been in the negative because of the feeling that a delay in the manufacturing standard Would introduce a longer period of uncertainty and have an adverse impact on the industry. This position,he said, had been reconsidered, partly because delay of the manufacturing standard proceedings has already occurred in connection with development and certification review of the Inflationary Impact Statement (IIS) and a survey of marketing , personnel indicates that a further delay in resolution of the manufacturing standard would not have a serious, adverse impact: in the marketplace. In addition, the feasibility aspect of a proposed construction standard is likely to be a prominent issue and, therefore, consolidation with the manufacturing proposal is definitely in the industry's interests. For the above reasons, a letter was sent to Dr. Morton Corn on July 27 reiterating the Association's primary recommendation regarding consolidation of proceedings and stating that injunctive relief was being considered if OSHA elected to proceed with an exclusive hearing on the manufacturing standard. (Note: This letter distributed to members by AIA/NA Memo. of 7/29/ 76.) He said he would propose that the Association proceed with an injunction if the latter event occurs.
Mr. Gabrielson reviewed developments concerning a proposed standard for the construction industry since the June 10 Board of Directors meeting. OSHA's Advisory Committee on Construction Safety and Health , subsequent to meriting June 29-30, has reaffirmed its position that a 2f/cc asbestos standard should be established fox the construction industry. On August 17, OSHA let a contract with Research Triang1 Institute, Research Triangle Park, N. C., for an engineering feasibility study and preparation of an inflationary impact analysis fOr development of a standard for the construction industry with completion date set for January 31, 1977. It was noted that there is a difference in procedure for a construction standard in that the impact analysis is now required prior to publication:of a proposed regulation. A proposed standard for the construction industry could be published as early as February or Match, 1977 with public hearing in April. Mr. Gabrielson suggested that the Association should,
141056
AIA WL 000003
Page 4
have its own study completed by March 1, 1977.
M. Gabrielson teViewed the work of the AIA/NA Ad Hoc Committee for ConstrUction in developing a request for proposal for a technological feasibility and economic impabt Study of the construction industry. Be stressed the importance of this matter. since approximately 70% of asbestos-Containing prodtictp are consumed by the: construction. industry, He also 410150 to the "indivisibility" of the asbestos-health issue in all aspects of the industry. He. said with Executive
Committee concurrence several consulting firms were invited to submit bids for the construction study tobe completed:in three phases Within 4 6-month timeframe. Pour. proposals have been received: 'Phases were described in general as: data gathering, industrial: hygiene, and evaluation and conclusions. Concurrent with the independent study, the Ad Hoc Committee for ConstructiOn will develop an industry nroposal for a construction
standard.
Mt. Gabrielson said estimates of costs frOm the four con- _ tractors tstere reasonably consistent. Phase. I estimate is $50,000. with. total cost about $15O,000 or about 50% higher than the. tleston study. Complexities of construction industry study are cause for increased cost, especially as pertains to exposure data, '114 stated he had recommended to the Executive Committee that a contractor be selected and Phase I of the study be authorized to commence immediately.
Mr. Dougherty expressed agreement of Executive Committee in
need for AIA/NA to pursue study of construction industry as an
urgentAnstter. He said the Executive Committee had authorized
Mt. Gabrielson to select a firm from those submitting bids and
enter into a contract on behalf of the Association for Phase I
(estimate $50,060). of the construction sutdy with an appropriate
cancellation clause included in event financial support is not
forthcoming. Mr. Dougherty proposed that funding for Phase I
be initially defrayed from the Association's reserve funds
and ultimately by- an
assessment of 1976 membership dues.
Funding for Phases II and III (estimate $100,000) to be inclUded
in the 1977 budget which could be accomplished by maintaining
the same dues for 1977 as at present (2.5 mills). Financial
support will also be sought from the construction industry.
Mr. Dougherty explained that a vote of Directors regarding an
18% assessment for 1976 would be formally acted on by written
ballot whcih will be forwarded by mail-to members with a requedted return date to the Executive Director of October 12,1976. After
discussion, and On motion by Mr. Thurber, the action of the Executive Committee to authorize Mr. Gabrielson to select a contractor
and proceed with PhaSe I of the study, subject to cancellation of
of contract following formal ballot vote of the Directors on
. A1A/NA Conducting the entire study, was unanimously approved.
141057
AIA WL 000004
Page 3
Mr, Gabrielson said the four nontrcters submitting bids for. the construction sttdy are: Equitable Environmental Health, Inc., Betz Environmental Engineers, Inc., the Franklin-Hahnemann Institute, and Charles T. Main, Inc. He said that it would be of significant assistance to the consulting firm selected if members would provide the AlA/NA office with a complete list of all asbestos-containing materials sold for use in construction; each such material to be identified by trade name, product code or other designation used by or known to the contractor who installs or applies it. In addition, members were requested to provide, if possible, the physical quantity and value of each, such material sold for use in construction in the U.S. He said that replies to this request will le kept confidential, will be delivered directly to the Association's outside consultant, will not be disclosed to other members , and will not be placed in AIA/NA files. The consultant will report the data only in aggregate, industry-wide or national_ Market form. A memorandum outlining the above was distributed to members present and is to be mailed to those not present.
Mr. Gabrielson spoke of the work of the Special Counsel
T.egal/Medioal Research Committee explaining that confidentiality
of work performed by SpeCial Counsel could. be maintained by
normal "atterney-client". relationship and by attorney's "work
product," The latter is in the form of memoranda, such
memoranda to be made available. to ALA/NA members upon. request
from company attorneys. In regard to obtaining"work product"
memoranda,
Gabrielson said that it is necesssaty for each
member company of the Association, other than those who have
members on the Legal/Medical Research Committee, to designate
an associate member of the, Committee. it is not necessary that
associate members be attorneys nor would they bs expected to attend
Committed meetings. Members, concerned were requested. to advise
the Executive Dirtctor the name of their associate.member designee
to the COmMittee in turn to infOrm Special COunsel.
Mt. Gabrielson discussed status of multidistrict panel approach to pending federal asbestos--health related cases. The Judicial Panel 94 MUltidistrict Litigation has,ordered the parties in various asbestos products liability suits to show cause why these suits should not be consolidated for pretrail proceedings, Mr. Gabrielson rerfered to a memorandum on the sublect which had been prepared: by Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft. The "work product" is available to AIA/NA members. He said it was Cadwalader's opinion that it would probably be in the industry's best interest to oppose the multidistrict procedure and to seek separate trials. Mr. Gabrielson stated many insurance carriers, including those of
mining companies in Canada, had registered opposition, to the procedure. He encouraged ALA/NA member to urge their respective carrier (s) to do likewise as well as litigate each case as a matter Of, policy rather than settle out of court.
141058
AIA WL 000005
Page 6 Revision of Association By-Laws
Mr. Dougherty discussed reasons for which the ExeO.utive Committee felt revision of Association By-'Laws Was in order, The matter was initially discussed at the JUne10 Board of. Directors meeting. Some administrative correcotins are necessary, ambiguities exist, and Association membership is now restricted, to one class. He said that the Executive Committee in. meeting September 7 reviewed in detail a draft revision and had. proposed several. modifications.. In view of time constraints, it was not possible to give full conSideratIon to the. draft. Mr. Dougherty Stated the draft would be' forwarded to members as soon as practicable for consideration and formal action at the December Board Of Directors meeting.
Other Business The next regular meeting of Directors is scheduled for December 9 at a time and place to be announced.
Adjournment There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 10:55 A.M.
- ereneSs Executive Director
20 September 1976
141059
AIA WL 000006
A ASBESTOS INFORMATION ASSOCIATION
NOFti MARC,. .1650 L Street. N W , Washirgton. 0 C 20036 (202) 2234886
ANNUAL MEETING SepteMber 8, 1976
Stouffer's National Center Hotel
Arlington, Virginia
The Annual Meeting of the Asbestos Information Association/ North America convened at 11:00 A.M., September 9, 1976, in Stouffer's National Center Hotel, Arlington, Virginia.
The following Directors were present:
George Barge Richard Bauer (for W. B.
Hoffman) W. H. Beasley John H. Chidester William Clark Thoma8 A, Dougherty William Fassuliotis James Gilmore (for D. E.
Eldred) John W. Hollingsworth A. R. Hooker John H. Marsh C. G. Morgan Dimitry Poutiatine Z. L. Rainey John Riopelle Martin J. Sendecki D. Tijumelis (for T. R.
Lindquist) William C. Thurber C. Fred Workman
AtlaS Atbestos Company National Gypsum Company
Cement ASbestes Products Co. Brunswick Fabricators, Inc: Asten-Hill Ltd. Certain"-teed Corp. GAF Corporation Vermont Asbestos Group
Dresser Industries (Magcobar Div.) The Flintkote Company Raybestos-Manhattan,. Inc. North American Asbestos Corp. Johns-manville Corp. Amatex Corp. The Bendix Corp:
Industries, Inc. Borg-Warner Corp.(Borg & Beck DiV.)
Union carbide Corp'. Nicolet, Inc.
Also present: Guy G. Gabrielson, Jr., Nicolet, Inc., Chairman, Asbestos Regulation Task Force; R. H. Mereness, Executive Director, AIA/NA ; A. H. Fay, Past President, AIA/NA; Richard E. Rosenburg, Borg-Warner Corp.; Joseph A. Artabane, Esq., Cadwalader, Wickersham and Taft; Richard T. Davis, Frank C. Frantz & Co.; B. J. Piqg, Administrative Assistant, AIA/NA ; and various industry representatives.
141060
AIA WL 000007
Page 2
Minutes
Mr. Dougherty, President of the Association, called the meeting to order at 11:00 A.M. On Motion, minutes of the last Annual Meeting, September 10, 1975, were approved as submitted.
Statement of Finances
Mr. Dougherty stated the Association's financial statement for the eight-month period ending August 31, 1976 had been reviewed by the Board of Directors at meeting immediately preceding. On motion, the statement of finances was accepted as presented to the
Directors.
Remarks of the Executive Director
Mr, Dougherty said he regretted that time constraints pre,cluded an oral presentation of Association activities by the Executive Director for the Preceding year. Copies of Mr. Mereness' remarks were distributed and are elSO appended hereto.
Designation of Directors
In accordance with Article 2, Section 1, AsgoCiation By-1'
Laws, the Secretary announced the lfoowl ing member company representatives as nOminees for membership on the board of' directors.
E. H. Feierabend
J. L. Rainey Robert Van Buren
William Clark George Barge John Riopelle. T. K. Lindquist John H, Chidester Nicolas Gritzuk W. H. Beasley Thomas A. Dougherty John R. Stetson A. R. Hooker William Fassuliotis
Robert B. Pilmer Joseph M. Ciskowski Dimitry Poutiatine Charles A Neumann John Hollingsworth Edward R. Zacharias Joseph T. Mooney, Jr. George P. Vogel William B. Hoffman Guy G. Gabrielson, Jr. C. G. Morgan John H. Marsh
AbeX Corporation Amatex Corporation American Biltrite, Inc.
ASten-Hill Ltd. Atlas Asbestos Company The Bendix CoMpany Borg-Warner Corporation Btuntwick Fabricators, Inc. Cassiar AsbeStos Corporation,Ltd.
Cement Asbestos Products Company Certain-teed Corp. congoleum Industries, Inc. The Flintkote Company
OAF CorporatiOn GailOck of Canada, Ltd. Jim Walter Research Corooration Johns-Manville Corporation Kentile Floors Magoohar DiV.i Dresser Industries
Molded Materials Company
MOnsey Products Company National Assn. of Filter Manufacturers National Gypsum Company Nicolet, Inc, North American Asbestos Corporation Raybestos-Manhattan, Ind.
141061
AIA WL 000008
Page 3
Clarence A. Herbst, Sr. J. E., Keith Kurt Schwarz William C. Thurber William K. Clark D. E. Eldr4.0.
Resinoid Engineering Corporation Rostone Corporation Supradur Manufacturing Corporation Union Carbide Corporation Uvalde Rock Asphalt Company Vermont Asbestos Group
The list,as read by the Secretary, was approved by vote without
objection.
Election of Officers
Mr. Barge, Chairman of the Nominating Committee, placed in nomination the following persons who were, by vote, unanimously
approved for office.
Thomas A. Dougherty
President
Guy G. Gabrielson, Jr. 1st Vice President
John H. Marsh
2nd Vice President.
Robert H. Mereness
Secretary/Treasurer
President's Remarks
Mr. Dougherty expressed appreciation to the Directors for the honor to continue to serve as the Association's president. He remarked on the special challenges of the past year and the tasks confronting the Association. He sooke of the growth of the Association and the cooperation of members in the work of the Association.
Mr. Dougherty said he wished to acknowledge several individuals Who had been of invaluable assistance to him as President as well as to the overall work of the Association. Those mentioned were: 'Joseph G. Hall, Noel W. Hendry, A. H. Fay and C. Fred Workman for past service on the Board of Directors; Dr. Hans Weill, AIA/NA medical advisor; members of the AIA/NA Standatds and Technical Committee with special recognition to its chairman, Dr. H.B. Rhodes; and members of the Executive Committee. Mr. Dougherty stated he knew he expressed the feeling of all metnbers in gratitude to Mr. Guy G. Gabrielson, Jr. for his outstanding leadership as chairman of the Association's Asbestos Regulation Task Force and to the Association's office staff, R. H. Mereness, B. J. Pigg and Virginia Detgen,
Adjournment
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:20 A.M. The Association's Third Annual Industry-Government Conference was scheduled to commence immediately thereafter.
. H. Mereness Secretary
Enclosure 20 September 1976
141062
AlA WL 000009
AIA/NA ANNUAL MEETING
STOUFFER'S NATIONAL CENTER HOTEL REMARKS OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR September 8, 1976
ARLINGTON, VA.
Last veer on this occasion I remarked that we, had had a busy year. These past twelve months have been even busier. I think we can speak of a number of accomplishments as we look to continuing challenges.
As you recall at this time last year we were anticipating that OSHA would issue amendments to the asbestos standard as a result of the court's ruling on a petition filed by the Industrial Union Department (AFL-CI0)., The Court had remanded two issues which pertained to the compliance date for the two fiber p/cc standard and retention period for exposure monitoring record's. Government speakers during our 1975 Industry-Government Conferece gave us no reason to expect that these amendments would contain any changes other than routine refinements to the standard. However, on October 9, 1975, OSHA proposed a major revision to the asbestos manufacturing standard which would further reduce the permissible exposure limit to 0.5 f/cc. The construction industry was specifically excluded for addressal at a later date. The history of the Association's response and actions to date are familiar to you and have been thoroughly addressed separately by the Chairman of our AsbestoS Regulation Task Force,Mr. Gabrielson. I will not attempt to review such in detail except to say that support of this eff.ort has necessarily required the major portion of our attention and effort. In December 1975, over 700 industry companies and trade eesociations were contacted by letter outlining the Association's
141063
AIA WL 000010
2/
plan for a response to the OSHA proposal and revess- in7 thiitir participation and support. Other mass mailings were to follow. An industry meeting was sponsored by AIA/NA on February 4, 1976 in Washington, D. C. to review work to date on a response. Our formal response on the proposed standard was delivered to OSHA on April 8, 1976., I know you appreciate the extraordinary volume of correspondence and associated logistics that have been required in support of this project. With hearing proceedings and issuance of a proposed construction standard yet to come, every indication is that the upcoming year will be no less devoted to contending with proposed standards for the asbestos industry.
There have been other specific items of Association work with
government agencies in addition to almost dally liaison. For
example, on October 14, 1975, EPA issued amendments to National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (Asbestos and
Mercury). The Association and various member companies had sub-
mitted detailed comments to EPA on the proposed amendments and
many of these were reflected in the approved version. This past
week on September 1, we submitted our comments to the Consumer
Product Safety Commission on a petition filed by the Natural
Resouces Defense Council, Inc and Consumer's Union of U.S.A.,
Inc. to ban patching compo"nds (taping, spackling, and joint
sealing) containing asbestos.
141064
AIA WL 000011
3
3/
The need of the Association to have expert advice on the
asbestos-health issues as recognized in the scientific community
were mot on October 1, 1975 when Dr. Hans Weill, Professor of
Medicine, Tulane UniverSity, became medical advisor to AIA/NA.
Recently, there have been two new AIA/NA Committees established:
AILegal/Medical Research Committee to exercise day-to--day directiop
o+er an AsSociation program to develop a legal and medical information
facility fOr asbestos-related litigatioh cases, and an Ad Hoc
Cimmittee for Construction to assist in coordinating deVelopment7f
of an AsSociation response to the forthcoming OSHA prOppsed as-
bestos Standard for the construction industry.
In March, the Association was named as a defendant in a state
of Michigan litigation case, Shoup. vs. Johns-Manville Products
co.* et al. I am pleased to promptly add that through efforts
of Association counsel., on May 5, 1976 the court dismissed AlA/NA
as a defendant without prejudice and without costs.
The Association continues to enjoy a close relationship with various trade and other associations baying an interest in asbestos. These include among others the: Asbestos Cement Pipe Producer's
AssociatiOn, the National Association of Filter Manufacturers, the
Asbestos Textile Institute, the Thermal Insulation ManufaCturers
Association, the Friction Materials Stnadards Institute, and the
National Paint and Coatings Association. We have contributed to
the work on asbestos with the American Society for Testing and
Materials, American Industrial Hygiene Association and other
groups.
141065
AIA WL 000012
The Association was represented at several important meetings relating to the asbestos-health issue during the past 12 months. Among these were;
a)quarterly meetings of the Standing ComMittee, International Asbestos Information Conference in Europe;
b) XVIII International Congress on Occupational Health in Brighton, England, this past September;
c)Industrial Health Foundation's 40th Annual Meettn'j in Pittsburgh this past October;
d)Society for OccupatiOnal and Environmental Health's Third Annual Meeting in Washington, D. C. this past December;
e)EPA's Hazardous Materials Advisory Committee, Science Advisory Board in Washington, D. C. in February;
f)National Academy of Science -- National Research Council in Washington, D. C. on public information on the prevention of occupational cancer in February;
g)the OSHA/USA Conference and Exposition in New York in May;
h)American /ndustrial Hygiene Conference'in Atlanta in May; and
i)OSHA and MESA advisory committee meetings on safety and health in Washington, D. C., San Diego, California , and Birmingham, ALA in January and June.
ProViding industry-wide information has been given emphasis primarily through the perparation and distribution of educational/
informational materials. The past year has been especially 141066
AIA WL 000013
5/
active in this regard. Over 14,000 indiVidual publications and posters have been mailed from the Association's office. Income from these materials has exceeded $10,000. One reason for the increase in requests for our materials may be attributed to the interest generated from non-member industry companies and trade associations as a result of our work on the response to OSHA's proposed revision to the asbestos standard.
New materials that have come "on-line" in 197& include:
AI
a) Five booklets covering recommended work practices for friction, textile, plastic, paper and sheet asbestos-containing products. TheSe booklets were deVe1oped by the Association's Standards and Technical tommittee.
b) Poster and leaflet dealing with recommended practices for handling asbestoS fiber,
Our "News & Notes", a monthly publication of information concerning occupational, Safety and health and environmental matters as pertains to the asbestos industry, continues to be received with interest by an increasing number of readers. No other publication covers the industry in this matter and it is a frequent object of favorable comment by recipients.
The following films from our library have enjoyed wide circulation:
141067
AIA WL 000014
6/
a)Johns- Manville - "Working With Asbestos" and "Asbestosthe Indespensibl.e Mineral."
b)AIC "Asbestos at Work" and "Xiller Dust - A Standard Mistake?"
c)3M - " Living With Dust"
Since September 1975 our preparation of correspondence workload has increased markedly; over 100 pieces per month as compared with 72 the previous year. We have received 264 written queries; 157 were received dUring the same prior period.4! Innumerable queries continue to be received by telephone.
On June 1, 1976 the Association office moved its location in Washington, D.O.;in order that current and anticipated needs might be met.
Our quarterly board meetings have been well attended and significantly contributed to accomplishment of the Association's objectives. Our meetings were held this past year here at Stouffer's with the exception of the March meeting which was held at Philadelphia.
The erents of the past-year have presented formidable challenges to the asbestos industry'and your Association. I believe AIA/NA has met squarely these challenges and our response thereto has been characterized with reasonableness and a keen sense of responsibility.
'y Speaking for your office staff, I express our sincere 141068
appreciation to the Association's officers and directors for your guidance and support. Your suqgestions and advice ore always welcome.
AIA WL 000015