Document 7R0E6bKGNmqMK6L0ykxnyGOxB
ATTORNEYS7 TEXTBOOK OF MEDICINE
By
ROSCOE N. GRAY, M.D.
SurgicaJ Director, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company . Hartford, Connecticut
SECOND EDITION
Aj-bany, N. Y. MATTHEW BENDER & COMPANY
INCORPORATED
1940
Chapter 51 *
ASBEST0S1S
tmyurtaac, p. 013 Asbestos exposure in industry,
p. 913 Composition of asbestos, p. 014
Processing of asbestos, p. 013 Action of asbestos dust on lung,
p. mo
Morbid anatomy or body changes, p. 018
X-ray findings, p. 9 iy
Symptom*, p. 919
Diagnosis, p. 921
Treatment, p. 921
Complications of the disease,
p. 922
Duratioa of necessary exposure,
0 ji. 922
'
Investigation of a claim, p. 923
Bibliography, p. 923
Asbestos particles inhaled into the lung produce an exceed ingly severe and perhaps fatal inflammation. This condition, called asbestosis, is not so important as many other forms of mineral irritation of lung tissue, because of its infrequency. However, it will become more prevalent as the industry grows. Care must be exercised in the event of claim, tiiat the dis ability is properly chargeable under the policy, that the cost should not be pro-rated with previous carriers, and that the diagnosis is correct. Since asbestosis is incurable, and usually results in total permanent disability followed by death, care and caution should be used before a claim is assumed.
Asbestos Exposure in Industry Asbestos is rapidly coming into use for a great variety of
articles, particularly due to its heat, chemical, and electrical resisting qualities. A list of these will indicate that exposure may appear in many industries: cloth for theatre curtains or scenery, and for suits, aprons, gloves, mittens, leggings, and helmets; paper for Altering strong acids or bases, and for linings between floors or on pipes; as a thick paper for linings of stoves, furnaces, heaters, filing cabinets, automobile muf flers, and electric switch boxes; as a doth covered with rubber cement for gaskets; woven with metal for break linings or clutch facings, and braided or woven tape: for non-inflam mable rope; as millboard and shingles: and mixed with Port land cement as fireproof shingles and building material.
Fortunately the manufacture of many of these articles is
58 913
au Occupational Poisons
not accompanied with a great deal of asboshus dust, which is the only form in which this substance is dangerous. After refinement and the pressing or weaving into cloth, tap*1, ropt^
i
paper, or sheets, there is usually too little dust liberated tVdo
r.?" much harm. We may, from a practical point of view elimi nate all plants as potential hazards in the produciioti of *A' asbestosis except quarrying, cleaning, spinning, weaving, and
pressing of this mineral.
'
Although asbestos has been used since antiquity, asbestosis is a distinctly modern disease, the first known case having
*
occurred in 1899, and only two were reported previous to 192S. How does it happen that apparently the disease did not occur
*
f
before! Just as with silicosis, considerable of the mineral must be inhaled, and it was not until the advent of machinery
i
that sufficient dust was produced. Particularly in the carding
of the fibers, preparatory to making thread for weaving cloth,
tape, and rope, enormous quantities of dust fly about. More
over, in all other stages of manufacture by machinciv until
the fibers are imprisoned in some permancut form, the mizard
is exceedingly great, unless the highest type of exhaust venti
lation is employed. The hand processes in use until recent
years were too leisurely to produce many particles suspoude'd in air.
1f
( Composition of Asbestos
Asbestos is not a single chemical entity. The name ih given to minerals that can be easily separated into flexible fibers. They are all silicates, compounds of metals, silicon, and oxy gen, occurring principally as hydrous magnesium or calcium silicate. Specimens from different parts of the world varv widely in formula and in physical as well as chemical quali ties, giving rise to many different names. It is riot necessary to know them apart, since all are apparently finite poi .onous if inhaled in sufficient quantity. The names of the common ones are given that yon may recounize them as n>bestos. and not be led astray, thinking them m lie something else.
The Canadian mines supply the bulk of the world's : upplv under the name chrysotilo, or serpentine. Chrysotilc has a particularly long, strong fiber easy to spin, but of little use as a resistant to acids. The Russian and South African amphi-
4
ii
34
Asbestosis
915
3 bole, or homblend, is poor for spinning:, but makes an excellent
acid resisting filter paper. Crocidoiite and amosite are asbes
% tos found in South Africa containing much iron silicate. Tremolite from Italy is largely magnesium silicate. Many
local names have been given, as mountain flax-when the fibers
are particularly silky and flexible. "When closely interwoven,
it is sometimes called mountain leather, mountain cork, or
mountain paper. That with very fine flexible fibers has been
called earth flax, flexible asbestos, amiantus, or amianthus.
There are many trade names as uralite, salamandrite, asbes-
tolith, and gypsine. They are all asbestos.
Processing of Asbestos
Asbestos is usually quarried although it may be tunnel mined, especially in Arizona. After dislodging by blasting with dynamite, the best, long fibered pieces are separated with small hammers by hand. This process is called cobbing. If 9 too wet the ore is dried. Then it is crashed by rock breakers, and finally divided between rollers. Fiberizers tear the fibers apart. On large screens, it is automatically shaken, with sepa ration of sand or dirt, and graded by rotary screening. Then it is bagged, and ready for manufacture into the many, final > products.
( The process of cloth making is very similar to that followed with cotton, necessitating carding, spinning, and weaving. The manufacture of paper, thick sheets, and fireproof board is preceded by sorting and so called "opening up,M wherein the fibers are pulled apart.
Dust
All of these processes are accompanied by a tremendous volume of very fine dust, until such time as the tiny, loose particles have become separated, and the fibers trapped as in thread, paper, or board. Then, handling is relatively harm less. The greatest dust hazard occurs in the carding rooms, although considerable danger is present until the fibers have Ihm'diih.* bound in some permanent form.
A microscopic study of asbestos and of the dust is necessary to a clear understanding of the lung changes occurring in this disease. The bulk of asbestos consists of translucent, glisten-
916
Occupational Poisons
ing fibers. A relatively small quantity of dark, opaque, angu lar particles are found scattered here and there. Tiny black granules are seen as integral portions of the fibers. The dus t contains not as many fibers as would be expected, but a reiir* ' - ^ tively small quantity, while the particles^xnfd granules are present in great profusion. The assumption is dear that the dust consists mostly of particles that have been mechanically loosened from the fibers, and that but little of the latter are found, since most of them are too large to fiv freely about, or have remained stuck to the remainder of the asbestos.
We shall find that the fibers and the black material play tw > different parts in the production of asbestosis. It is there fore necessary that we know their chemical composition. sThs fibers are silicates whose formula depends upon the particular variety of asbestos present. The dark material is very rich i.t iron oxide and carbon.
Action of Dost on Lung
Fibers may be inhaled in such tremendous quantities that
actual plugging of bronchioles occurs. .Examination of th.i
lung will disclose asbestos fragments of all sizes, from very
thin spicules 1 micron (1/25,000 inch) in length to other; .
extending 360 microns (over 1/10 inch). They are the exact
L counterpart of those found in asbestos dust. When a bron chiole is plugged, no longer permitting the passage of air, that
part of the lung cannot function. It dies, and either become
abscessed, or replaced by scar tissue.
*
Fortunately, the majority of fibers are too small to proven:
passage of air, or are not inhaled in sufficient quantity. How
ever, unlike most foreign bodies that enter the luiur, they
cannot be swept out by the lashing motion of the Imir-liko
cilia on the mucous membrane, whose function is to remov.?
dust from the lung. Asbestos is too irregular, and the frag
meats usually become lodged, to remain within the lunar, only
to begin the slow, insidious poisoning that will continue for
many years.
It is not entirely clear what occurs, but apparently the fol
lowing complicated steps give the best accepted oxpianntioi
of the changes found in the lung, so far as the asbestos fibo.
is concerned:
V
ys* is
ASUHSTUSIS
017
1. The asbestos spicule or fiber lodges in a bronchiole or an alveolus. (Dilated structure at end of bronchiole where oxygen absorption occurs.)
2. Minute extravasation of blood or scrum envelops the spicule.
3. The minute soluble portion of the asbestos dissolves in the serum and mucus.
4. The surface of the fiber adsorbs, or holds thereto the colloidal solution of asbestos and serum, or mucus.
5. Chemical reaction occurs between the soluble portion of asbestos and tissue fluids with loss of water, so a perma nent union results, coating the fiber.
o*. This jelly-like envelope becomes molded by the alveolar or bronchial currents in the nonmil How of mucus in the lung.
7. From time to time these "curious bodies" become loos ened and carried out of the lung by the action of the cilia. Then they appear in the sputum.
These "curious bodies" gain their name from the variety of shapes they may assume, and the fact that their nature was not at all understood for some time. A better name, of late suggested, is "abesrosis bodies." Their presence in any con siderable number, -dther in the sputum or the lung, is proof positive of asbestos exposure, since they have never been found clue to any ocher condition. It is not necessary to go into an elaborate description of the very complicated steps needed to prove the identity of alleged "asbestosis" or "curi ous bodies." It requires the most expert laboratory work to complete this cardinal proof of diagnosis. Since it is but rarely that a doctor can be found who has seen them, you should consult a very able pathologist, and ask him to make the necessary tests, in accordance with technique such as out lined by Merewether under the title: "The Occurrence of Pul monary Fibrosis and Other Pulmonary Affections in Asbestos "Workers," reported in the Journal of Industrial Hygiene for June 1030 on Page 23.0 (6).
It will be recalled that asbestos dust not only contains fibers, but that many particles are also present. They are mostly either of carbon or various compounds of iron, magnesium, or
91S Occupational Poisons are silicates, as mica. These particles may be seen inter-
|
spersed throughout the asbestos ore, and have become dis
lodged when the fibers were torn apart. Tlius, finished ashes- ^
tos products contain but few, while the dust^especiallv of the' '
carding rooms, is loaded with them. /
I
As would be expected, the lung of an old asbestos worker
1
contains many "particles," inhaled through the years. Since
they are practically insoluble, they remain in the lung if small
j
enough to enter the alveoli, or are not swept out by the cilia
I
of the mucous membrane. They do not remain at the spot where they lodged, but are seized upon by the "dust cells" of
jj j
the lung and the phagocytes, or white cells that act as the
i
..'*ii :; .
scavengers of the body. These ingest the particles, dissolve out any digestible material, and carry the remainder away.
Similarly, the tiny asbestos fibers, undergoing chemical
! i j
change, are carried off in nature's effort to rid the body of
:
their poisonous presence. The "dust cells" and phagocytes
!
do not always succeed in their task of elimination. The jour-
:
ney from the alveoli and bronchioles to the lymphatic glands
is but slowly made. Many of the "scavenger cells" die on
the way, leaving the ingested "particles" and "curious
bodies " behind. This is particularly true where the lymphatic *
channels which they follow join one another. Then plugging
c may occur at these points, due to the great quantity of
.
insoluble and poisonous material being carried along.' So,
masses of "particles" and "curious bodies" will be found
here and there at the junction of lymphatics and in the various
lymphatic glands of the lung.
TThile the "particles" do not undergo very important chem
ical changes, leading to the death of many cells, the asbestos
fibers seriously disturb the life processes of surrounding
tissue. Local inflammation and death result. Areas of lung
are destroyed and healing occurs through replacement with
fibrous cells, similar to scar tissue. The fibrosis of asbestosis
ens\ies.
Morbid Anatomy
A description of the lung changes will clearly explain the symptoms of this disease. A complete and masterly discus-
Asbestosis
919
sion of this subject has been given by E. R. A. Mercwether (5) in the Journal of Industrial Hygiene for June 1930.
Briefly, the changes are divided into two stages, tissue destruction and reparative processes. The poisonous action of the asbestos leads to a destruction of m-ncons membrane in the bronchioles and alveoli, as well as of the lymphatic channels through which the "scavenger cells" attempt to carry the dust away to the lymphatic glmuls. Thus a chronic bron chitis is set up. If bronchioles become mechanically plugged, necessitating increased air supply to uninvolved portions of the lung, many dilate, produciug a bronchiectasis, or dilata tion of bronchi. Complete stoppage of air channels leads to death of that part of the lung which no longer fuucrions. Sufficient air cannot be absorbed, so breathlessness on exertion ensues.
X-Ray Findings
Nature tries to overcome the difficulty by replacing de stroyed structures with fibrous tissue. Tin* degree of fibrosis will, of course, depend upon how far advanced the changes are, but the most characteristic x-ray finding is the so-called "ground-glass" appearance, wherein the entire picture has a hazy, indefinite, fogged effect, due to the presence of fibrosis scattered throughout the lung. Close examination show* that the haziness is not entirely vague, but consists of fine lines during the early stages, with tiny dots appearing later, as masses of dust are deposited at the junction of lymphatics. The dots become larger, with a coarse mottling of the picture. Finally, large masses of scar bind the layers of the pleura together, and adhesions drag various parts of the limy away from their normal positions.
The x-ray findings, as a general rule, are more pronounced in the lower third of the lungs during the early staire.- of the disease. Later, they are manifest everywhere.
Symptoms
As may be expected, the symptoms arc very largely due to the destruction of lung tissue and to the bronchitis. Dyspnea, or shortness of breath on exertion is a cardinal symptom in
1)20 Occupational Poisons
52% of cases. Cough, due to bronchitis, occurs in 59%.
Because of insufficient lung tissue to properly aerate the
blood, cyanosis, or a blueness of the skin is apparent in 56%
of patients. Bronchitis accounts for marked raising of'
phlegm with 34%. Adhesions of the pleura produce pain in
11% of cases.
Shull (8) presents an interesting study of seventy-one cases
showing certain progressive changes that occur during the
course of the disease. He divided his patients in accordance
with the degree of lung fibrosis shown on x-ray, into slightly
advanced 23%, moderate 49%, and far advanced 23%.
Shull (8) found hypertrophy of the right heart in 37.5%
of his early cases of asbestosis. This condition was evident
in 62.8% of the moderately advanced. In those with marked
lung fibrosis, 95% had developed enlargement of the right
heart Thus it may be clearly concluded that asbestosis seri
ously embarrasses pulmonary circulation, contributing to the
most common subjective symptoms, shortness of breath and
cyanosis, blueness of the skin.
Hypertrophy of the right side of the heart is to be expected
as Lanza (9) explains, because asbestosis leads to a constric
tion of the tiny pulmonary arterioles in their course along the
bronchioles. The increasing fibrosis involving the smaller air
passages inevitably includes thickening of the blood vessel
walls, impeding blood circulation, demanding enlargement of
the right side of the heart, responsible for pulmonary blood
pressure.
.
Thickening of the pleura and pericardium progress with
advancing asbestosis, as disclosed by Shull's scries. In those
classified as early, noticeable thickening had not occurred in
a single patient, while 28.6% of the moderate cases showed
these involvements, and 45% of those with advanced lung
fibrosis also had thickening of the pleura and pericardium.
The left side of the diaphragm was distinctly higher than
the right in only 12.5% of the early cases, in 4S.6% of the later
stage patients, while S0% of the advanced cases disclosed this
finding.
*
Difficulty with breathing tends to a compensatory enlarge
ment of the entire chest cage, the emphysematous chest. In
Shull's early cases, the finding was infrequent, only appearing
Asbestosis
921
in G.3% of his patients, 60.7% of those classified as moderate presented this finding, while 95% of those with marked lung fibrosis had emphysematous chests.
Diagnosis
This disease occurs rarely in the experience of most doctors, and they usually received no teaching regarding probable find ings. Thus they cannot be expected to recognize a case with out special study. The similarity to silicosis leads to mistake unless great care is used in the interpretation of x-rays. Even the pictures may be so similar that the history of exposure to asbestos or silicon dioxide must be carefully considered.
Frequently the findings and x-ray studies indicate a fibrous tuberculosis, which may also be independently present. Bron chitis in an asbestos worker does not necessarily indicate asbestosis, nor does bronchiectasis, although both are very suggestive. Cyanosis and breathlessness may be entirely due to some other condition, as heart disease or asthma.
It is clear that the most expert advice is necessary to a true determination, which must usually depend upon a careful study of excellent x-rays, a search for "asbestosis bodies" in the sputum, a study of the asbestos and other dust exposures over all the patient's life, and a careful elimination of other possible diseases as causative factors in the production of symptoms.
Treatment
This is a very serious disease and is practically incurable. Particles once ingested continue their slow, insidious, tissue destruction through years, even though exposure may long have terminated. We know of no way to stop the action or to bring about the elimination of asbestos fibers. While thoAc too large to be carried toward the lymphatic glands may become loosened in the bronchioles from time to time and eliminated in the sputum, appearing ns "asbestosis bodies," the smaller ones are usually in the lung to stay.
Of course, the bronchitis may be alleviated by usual treat ment directed toward this disease, but it will continue. The patient's general strength should be maintained by study of his hygiene. Usually, death is not due to the asbestosis, but
U`22
Occupational Poisons
to some other disease particularly of the hr?. Therefore, pneumonia must be guarded against. The shortness of breath on exertion can only be mot by avoiding hoary work. In time, the patient probably will become a total permanent disability. Death usually occurs within a year after tk* patient can no longer work.
Complications
It is sometimes alleged that tuberculosis is likely to result from this disease, but Merewether (6) poims out that only 9.9% of patients with asbestosis show signs o: tuberculosis, and concludes from his studies that there is ro great suscepti bility to pulmonary tuberculosis among workers in asbestos, even though they already had fibrosis, sincc-'about the same amount of the disease occurred in the generiL population.
Bronchitis and bronchiectasis are almost inevitable.
Duration of Exposure
The discussion relative to symptoms, treatment, and likeli hood of total permanent disability is based upon the assump tion that definite, disabling asbestosis has (ceurred. If the exposure is slight, as in a well guarded plant with good exhaust ventilation, insufficient asbestos wil \>o absorbed to destroy a vital amount of lung. Again, exposure may not continue over enough years to have brought about the inhala tion of sufficient dust. Usually the slow beginning symptoms of bronchitis or shortness of breath cause :he employee to change his work to a less dusty or laborious occupation.
The average exposure before the appearance of the disease is 13.5 years. It is very rarely found with Isss than 5 years labor with this dust, rapidly increases after this duration, and beyond the tenth year, the likelihood of asbto>is is exceed ingly great.
The danger is proportionate to the dust sount. If this is low enough, elimination practically equals the rate of inhala tion. Relatively little dust occurs in those processes after spinning, because the "particles" have hecouc freed, and the fibers have been trapped into a permanent position. Since asbestosis practically does not occur with .-pinning, unless there has been previous exposure t< n:*ire d:.-:;* processes, it
Asbkstosis
t>23
is considered that the dust concentration of tin* >pinning room
is safe. Jlerewetiier (6) found the dust count iu this depart ment to be as low as 506 to the cubic centimeter, equal to about 13,500,UUO lo the cubic fool. Iu the dusty departments, the count ran as high as 170,743,000 to the cubic foot.
Investigation
Investigation must be thoroughly conducted along three
lines; duration and intensity of exposure, and the true cause
of the disability.
'
Even though the patient may have asbestosis, and has worked for some time with considerable exposure, this is not
sufficient grounds to charge the disability to the present
employment alone. The average period of exposure is 13,5
years. Very few men have continued to work this long for a single assured, and but rarely is the same carrier on the risk throughout the entire exposure the patient has had. Obvi
ously the disease was caused by all of the asbestos inhaled, not the fibers respired during the past few months or years alone. Therefore, the disability should bo charged pro-rata to ail carriers during the entire time of asbestos exposure.
In fact, to be scientifically accurate, probably little or none
of the asbestos inhaled within many months lms had time to go through the chemical processes necessary to destroy tissue,
and thus is not a causative factor. This fact probably would
not convince a jury that the disease should bo charged only to carriers in past years, but it'is true that all of the exposure
the patient has had throughout his life contributed pro-rata to the disability in direct proportion to time and concentration of asbestos dust.
The intensity of exposure is important, even in the proven
case of this disease. Unless the dust count exceeds that usually present in the spinning room, of about 13,500,000 to the cubic foot, the condition is probably due to previous expo
sure alone. The protective mechanism of the body is able to handle this amount indefinitely.
The true cause of disability must be determined. This necessitates expert study of x-rays, search of the sputum for "asbestosis UkV.csm, and definite conclusion that other dis
ease is not the cause. Unless the experts have had experience
524
Occupational Poisons
wiiii this disease, the attorney should ask them to rend this chapter, since their text-books will be of little avail, and to particularly study the articles of Merewethcr listed as (5) and-f* ;,6; in the Bibliography. It is not surprising that doctors have had but little experience whoTudf is recalled that only rwo cases were reported up to 192S.
Risk Control
IN THE CONTROL OF A RISK, THE FOLLOWING POINTS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED:
1. In what departments do asbestos dust counts exceed the threshold limit of 13,500.000 per cubic foot during any considerable period of the day?
2. May the concentration be reduced in such departments through mechanical means, or the number of exposed workers reduced through partitions?
3. Respirators must be worn when exposed to concentra tions exceeding 13,500,000 per cubic foot.
4. The use of respirators must be enforced by monitors with police power, and discharge as the penalty for disobedience.
5. Physical examination before employment should be, required. Workers should not be exposed to asbestos if they show positive evidence of chest disease.
.
'
I ' .
IN THE STUDY OF AN INDIVIDUAL CLAIM, THE FOLLOWING POINTS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED:
'
j
1. All records of physical examinations should be carefully
scrutinized by an expert trained in the detection of asbestosis and of other chest diseases.
1 i
2. Determination should be made relative to whether the entire disability is due to asbestosis or other disease a direct outcome thereof, and what part of the disability is due to conditions not caused or aggravated by asbestos inhalation.
3. A careful history should be taken covering all exposure to asbestos throughout life, unless claim is brought under a compensation act which does not permit prorating between present and past employers.
\
( `
4. The history should endeavor to determine the approxi-
j
mate lengths of exposure at various concentrations, and
2C.
a rough estimation of the asbestos dust counts for each
!
should be made.
:
. V.
; t i ' i S i {
f
4
i )
Asbestosis
m
5. The decree of exposure for the past and present employ ments should then be compared.
6. Has work with the present employer appreciably
exceeded asbestos inhalation of 13*>00,000 particles per
cubic foot?
* * **
7. Is it certain that diagnosis has notion made largely on x-ray findings and enip!oymcnt'"with asbestos, with out making certain that some other disease as bronchitis or silicosis may not be the real causative factor?
Obviously these studies necessitate the highest class tech nical exports for determination. Since each case is a probable fatality, any reasonable expense is -warranted. Only in this way can the attorney avoid a determination based on history of exposure or sheer guess work, and without properly charg ing disability to all carriers entering into the exposure. Jus tice must be done to both the patient and the Company.
Bibliography
The following authorities may be of value during study and triai:
(3) Encyclopedia Britanniea.
(5) Merewether, E. R. A. The Occurrence of Pulmonary r ibrrwis and Other
Pulmonarr Affections in Asbestos Workers. Jmir. Industrial Ilvgiene, May,
1930, p. 198.
(6) Continuation of (3) in .Tur. Indussrinl Hygiene, dune, 1930. p. 239.
(?) Lynch, E. -if., ;nd Smith, W. A. Asbestos Bodies in Sputum and Lang
Jour. Am. Med. Assoc., Aug. 30. '30, p. 639.
(S) Cooke, W. F.. Asbestos Oust :md the Curious Bodies Found in Pulmonary
Asbestosis. British M*<1. .lour.. Sept. 2S, '29. p. 37$.
(9) McDonald, Stuart. Histology of Pulmonary Asbestosis. British Mod.
Jour., Dec. 3, '27, p. 1025.
-
(10) Wood, W. B., and flloyne, S. B. Pulmonarr Asbestosis. Lancet, Mar. 1,
>30, p. 445.
.
(11) Shull, J. R. Asbestosis: Roentgenologic Review of Seventy-One Cases,
Radiology, Syracuse, X. V.. Sept. 1936. p. 379. Abstract in Jour. Am.
Med. Assoe., Vol. 107, Nor. 28, >36, p. 1841.
(12) Lansa. A. J. Asbestosis. Jour. Am. Med. Assoe., Vol. 106, Feb. 1, T6, p. 368.
'
I j
4
i i
i
i
i }