Document 7OjJDrvY2596jDZ5xRVD6oywR
TERNATIONAL SMELTING AND REFINING COMPANY East Chicago, Indiana
G. B. JOHNSON
*1 liJfc'UlA
April 26th, 1945
Mr* Frederick Laist, Vice President International Smeltg. and Refg* Co* 25 Broadway - Room 1720 New York 4, New York
Dear Mr. Laist:
Labor Situation
Just after our telephone conversation of yesterday, we met with the Union Committee at 10 A.M* to discuss the packer rate contro versy* Mr* Piani, Field Representative, made the following demands for the Union:
1. They want a guaranteed hourly base rate of $1*03 per hour for packing zinc oxide instead of the present guaranteed rate of 86? per hour.
The Union used the following as arguments to justify their demands that the Zinc Oxide Packers should be paid the same guaranteed rate as the White Lead Packers:
1* The work is too hard 2. The work is dangerous to the health of the employee and requires constant medical supervision by the employee's personal physician.
Work Is Too Hard We pointed out to the Committee that former packing crews hare
packed 1200 to 1400 bags per day, whereas this particular crew is objecting to packing anything more than 800 bags per day and feels that 1,000 bags per day is more than they can do regularly*
Health Hazards We pointed out that we had recently installed dust collecting
equipment on all of the leaded zinc oxide packers and that this equipment should greatly reduce the hazard of lead absorption in this department* They .felt that zinc oxide dust was dangerous to health even though it was lead-free* One of the arguments used was that the zinc oxide dust created oonstipation.
PNYC 00013187
Mr. Frederick Laist
-2-
April 26th, 1945
Minimum Guaranteed Rate We frankly told them that the White Lead Packing rates are
decidedly oat of line and too high. We offered to equalize the packing rates at the Oxide and White Lead Plant based upon the "take home" pay. This they very quickly refused to do. We sounded them out on the
possibility of eliminating the incentive white lead packing rate and the establishment of hourly rates for the packers to avoid any further comparison in the packing rate between the two plants. This suggestion was rejected.
The Union suggested that if we could not agree on rates or
change in working conditions, that the three men composing one packing
crew, who have complained about the work endangering their health, be
transferred .to laborer's duty in the labor gang. This we agreed to do
with the following stipulation - that the change would be made Monday,
April 30th, and that the Union would jointly sign a notice to the effect
that thes$ jobs were available to any employee in the plant. This notice
has been posted.
The Union understands that if none of our present employees care to work on the packer crew, we will hire other employees through the United States Employment Service Office and that the former crew will lose their seniority rights on the packer job.
We hope these decisions will close the grievance.
GSJ/bm cc: Mr.J.R.Hobbins
Mr. W.H. Hoover
PNYC 00013188