Document 7OBmoRm6x9OvX5GRK7qkYb91E

Rbbco REGENERATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIPMENT CO., INC. YOUNG INDUSTRIAL PARK MUNCY, PENNSYLVANIA 17756 SUBJECT: FUME & ODOR CONTROL Did you see our insert in POLLUTION ENGINEERING? For complete information use the reply card. May we help you? r~ Cordially REECO James H. Mueller President DSW 588193 STLCOPCB4093529 3E'sy.fc<*'2f**,w .^5^ 'r.W.: -V. jtA;V- *- it ' ' t C*^ ^' ;??ri0ssg: Fuel Cost is Normallry^^s* the Greatest Cost. -^0 ^S*S?"iK* *''?. " ;>-S* 1?*' . -J-!- -' sfinv Cost Pollution Control.*'1' Ta>'* v -' 'WV*$Sfcsjj Fumeand Odor Control ISft kore-i refit rm$ wsmdm ....... irestotal ipperatlng .... " ">le;* ssf&vi Sr'*.; DSW 588194 STLCOPCB4093530 r^;ar*%*SSr3i5 ?**. S'. A* , 0-COSTS fMAKE THE BIG DIFFERENCE - >' * J, .*. ,,2r ^Fiiel Hisage is the greatest ;?i6 normally 3n ithe range of Single factor of operating cost '1,000 BTU/Ft3 for natural gas, isfor.thermal oxidation equip- and 140,000 BTU/Gal. for No. 2 f^lment. The RE-THERM System fuel oil. The HHV is NOT the goffers extremely high thermal energy available to do workT scovery efficiency and.there- r Two losses occur in the j, -low fuel consumption -- .^combustion and utilization of total operating cost.. Q fuel. (1) ?the latent heat P^IlTable'Two shows fuel cost loss which is that energy used somparisons for: the. RE- in the chemical combustion of I'THERM. Thermal Regenerative ^Bystem^oommon afterburner, eland afterburner with a tube- type metal heat exchanger. . Available Energy v- ^U^Energy normally .quoted for the fuel, and (2) the sensible ,.heat loss which is that energy lost due to the temperature of the exhaust gases. These two fosses (latent and sensible heat) represent 42% of the natural gas gross energy for a f^hatural gas or oil Is based on - common afterburner exhaust ' '5Jhat which is theoretically ing at 1500F. The com raii^ble:SThis theoretical parable RE-THERM losses are luegScnbwn -as 'the ^higher iess than one-half of the after- iif>? **W ** ^ > i RE-THERM ! - SYSTEM *e1o0%,000 SCFM |*00F HW00F - *i |480F |S60F *,608,000 1-1036 > 60.68 ._ 18% . ' I 82% I 8,805 i *2.91 1*11.640 1-66% 1 #70.600 . ' - yo,Ss.s!E Energyy CrissiIsS'lL'&NjTCOx^ y ment operatlngcosts. RE- ` 'v - 'THERM oHers typical fuel sav 1 ' The increased demands on ings -Of 86%fe5Ahother anti- our natural resources are rais pollutionfactor.ofthe system's ing fuel costs and limiting' lower-fuel ^consumption is availability --thus .having an lower oxides of nitrogen emis ever greater effect on equip- sions to the atmosphere. RE-THERM rftHIGH-EFFICIENC?i^&ATION :l The basic operation of the -Whis procedure is then re . RE-THERM System 4s shown peated, with the damper se starting with Diagram A. Puri quence rotating to the next fication is accomplished by energy recovery chamber to be having the process fumes Q) used as the pre-heat chamber. enter through an inlet damper ..In actual operation the flow (2) and flow through a pre-heat through the pre-heat/energy - chamber (|) which had recov recovery chambers is depend ered thermal energy during a ent on the size of the equip previous cycle. The pre-heat ment and the number of cham "chamber raisesThe ttempera- bers incorporated. ture.of.4he gases prior to their,. entering the.purification cham- 1 " - ' - ber (4) where fumes"and'^l&Beeciftas at^OO^F*^' odors are destroyed. After pur The average time gases are ification, clean gases pass in -the purification chamber, at through th^energy recovery *ratedVconditions}?is .^approxi chambers (5), where eighty mately 1s8 seconds. This -ex percent of trie thermal energy tended period of time provides is recovered} The purified .higher `purification'tlevels by gases then exit through the the classic Time <r Tempera outlet dampers. ^ ^ i ture r-Turbulanoe'concept., . ______ -p PROCESS * FUMES' : , INLET-OAMPER ,, - PRE-HEAT CHAMBER W (Energy Recovery Chamber) ,1 PURIFICAffON 'p' .fcHAMBER^ , ^ SaMBE^EC- 'CHAMBER PURIFIED GABES OUTLET .DAMPER';^1 STLCOPCB4093531