Document 7M7Ln67gN7kkM2EaNyowRNpE6
November 9, 1992
Attached is the initial Corrective Actions report to the E,H&S audit conducted at the Henry, Illinois facility on August 10-14, 1992. This report ciddresses all items identified in your audit report, dated October 2, 1992.
Per your instructions, quarterly reports will follow until all outstanding corrective actions have been completed. The first of these follow-up reports will be issued by February 9, 1993.
cc:
with attachment: M.Marshall W.C.Holbrook / J.Lewis G.Higby K.J.Willings - SP&C Brkvl.
cc:
w/o attachments W.Patient / E.Martinelli P.Donataccio / D.Giffin C.Mattia - Bath
\/
NGC 12519
AUDIT-PC 1.51
Workslieet
Primulecti Inc
Company Bl'GOODllICH Facility'. HENRY
Page: 1
Session: 1 08-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26-92
System: 1 MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dwg#:
+----------------------------------------------------------------------4-4-----------------------------------------------4----------------------------------------
`
QUESTION
;A: REMARKS
{ RECOMMENDATIONS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4-4--------------------------------------------- ------------------------ 4-------------------------------------- ---
II. WWTP V-NOTCH WEIR WAS NOT {P{
JCALIBRATED.
{{
{1. CALIBRATE ;
'.BY :
COMMENTS
4--------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- --
:Wjc;1. 11/92: THE V-
;
; ;NOTCH WEIR IS TO BE 1
: ;CHECKED IN
; *, ACCORDANCE WITH
{
i JCHAPTER 6 OF THE
;
: :eps's npdes
:
i {COMPLIANCE
{
*, {INSPECTION MANUAL. {
{ {THIS WILL BE
*
{ {PERFORMED ON AN
{
{ {ANNUAL BASIS. A
{
{ {CALIBRATION CHECK
{
{WILL BE PERFORMED {
{ {MONTHLY ON THE
{
{ {SECONDARY MEASURING {
{ {DEVICES AND THE
{
{ {COMPUTER READOUT TO {
{ {INSURE RELIABLE
{ {DATA. (SDJ.,WJG)
{
: U2/I/92.
;
2. THE RADIATION SAFETY OFFICER HAS NOT BEEN TRAINED AND THE PERMIT HAS NOT BEEN UPDATED.
{P { 1 J
2. TRAIN OFFICER
{DEG{2. 11/92: TRAINING { {HAS BEEN SCHEDULED { {FOR D.E.GIFF1N THE { {WEEK OF NOV 9TH TO { {ATTEND THE TN { {RADIATION SCHOOL. { {ONCE CERTIFICATION ; {HAS BEEN OBTAINED { {THE PLANT LICENSE { {WILL THEN BE { {AMENDED. (DEG) { {2/1/93.
J { { { { { { { { { {
3. ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT?
;
(IMPACT) ASSESSMENTS WERE NOT 1
COMPLETED.
;
3. PROVIDE ASSESSMENTS
{DMK{3. 11/92: ALL EA'S, {
; {AR'S, AND GPO'S NOW {
{ {HAVE ENVIRONMENTAL
{
'.IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
{ {INCLUDED TO INSURE
{
{ {THAT ENVIRONMENTAL
{
{ {CONCERNS ARE
{
{ {ADDRESSED. COMPLETE {
{ {9/1/92
4. SCAFFOLDING WAS NOT INSPECTED QUARTERLY.
|C{ 1;
4. INSPECT
{DEG{4. A PM MAINTENANCE { { {WORK ORDER HAS BEEN { ! {GENERATED TO INSPECT;
{THE SCAFFOLDING ON A{
NOC 12520
AUDIT-PC 1.51
Worksheet
Primatech Inc
Company: BFCOODRICH Facility: HENRY
Page: 2
Session: 1 08-10-92 System: 1 MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Revision: 0 10-26-92
Bwg$;
[ QUESTION
1
a
ii
%
i
<t a
i i
ii
i i
:ai
it it
i
ia
i i
<
44 9i
4
r4
a 4
i1
14 I1
ta
aa
ia it
REMARKS
: RECOMMENDATIONS
[BY [
COMMENTS
[
a4 [QUARTERLY BASIS, THEJ
11
1 a
[PLANT PRESENTLY AND [
lf
i
[IN THE PAST INSPECTS!
a
i
tl [PRIOR TO EACH USE OF[
i4
[THE SCAFFOLDING
[
a i
a [WHICH IS MORE
J
i
i
[FREQUENT THAN
[
a a
a a
[QUARTERLY.
[
i i
i [ (COMPLETE) 10/30/92.';
Session: 1 08-10-92 System: 2 RESPONSIBLE CASE
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Revision: 0 10-26-92
Dwg#:
! QUESTION
ja; REMARKS
[ RECOMMENDATIONS [BY 5
COMMENTS
[
[I. THERE WAS NOT SUFFICIENT
;p;
OCUMENTATION SUPPORTING STAGE
I PROGRESS OF THE RESPONSIBLE
CARE POLLUTION PREVENTION
CODE.
;i . PROVIDE AN UP-TO -JDMKJ1. 11/92: THE
ATE QUALITATIVE
JPOLLUTION PREVENTION
MISSIONS INVENTORY.
ICODE INVENTORY WILL
1 BE UPDATED AND
I SUBMITTED. (DMK)
[12/1/92.
2. EVALUATE
DMK:2. 11/92: AN
POTENTIAL IMPACT OF
1 EVALUATION OF THE
RELEASES ON THE
!POTENTIAL RELEASE ON
ENVIRONMENT AND THE
ITHE ENVIRONMENT AND
HEALTH AND SAFETY OF
ITHE SAFETY OF
EMPLOYEES AND THE
J EMPLOYEES AND THE
COMMUNITY.
1 COMMUNITY HAS BEEN
I PERFORMED. THIS WAS
[PERFORMED IN
I CONNECTION WITH THE
SREQUIREMENTS OF THE
[ILLINOIS CHEMICAL
I SAFETY ACT.
'.(COMPLETE! 1/1/92
3. ESTABLISH priorities taking INTO CONCERN POTENTIAL HEALTH AN SAFETY IMPACTS.
DMK[3. 11/92: ONCE THE [PRIORIT1ES HAVE BEEN ;ESTABLISHED. [MEETINGS WITH PLANT [EMPLOYEES AND THE [PUBLIC WILL DE HELD [TO RECF1VE THEIR [RECOMMENDATIONS. ;(DMK, PD) 6/1/93
NGC 12521
AUDIT-PC 1.51
Worksheet
Primatech Inc.
Company: BFGGODRICH Facility-: HENRY
Page: 3
Session: 1 05-10-92 System: 2 RESPONSIBLE CARE
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Revision: 0 10-26-92
Dwg#:
QUESTION
1 1
4t 4a
[A[
V1 44
1t
1 14 1I
REMARKS
J RECOMMENDATIONS
* [4. PROVIDE [MEASUREMENT OF ON [ 'GOING REDUCTION [PROGRESS.
[BY [
COMMENTS
[
[ DMK [4. UPDATE POLLUTION [
1 1
[PREVENTION CODE
[
4 t
[ INVENTORY ANNUALLY". [
1 [(DMK) ANNUALLY.
[
Session: 1 08-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26- 92
System: 3 SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dwg#:
QUESTION
*1 [A[ REMARKS
* [ RECOMMENDATIONS
l*
[1. HAZARD WASTE MANAGEMENT WAS 5 P J
[DEFICIENT IN SEVERAL AREAS
V 1 t 1
1
4 r
[[
i4
;; [ i;
* [1. ALL SEVEN [SATELLITE [ACCUMULATION AREAS [WERE NOT INSPECTED [ON A WEEKLY BASIS. [ADDRESS.
[BY [
COMMENTS
[
*
[DMK[1. 11/92: THE PLANT
; [WASTE HANDLING
j [PROCEDURES HAVE BEEN
! [THOROUGHLY REVIEWED
44 [WITH RESPECT TO RCRA
4 4
[GUIDELINES, BFG
[ POLICY AND GMP SINCE
;the audit and
CORRECTED
[ACCORDINGLY. ALL
[SATELLITE
[ACCUMULATION AREAS
[ARE NOW INSPECTED [WEEKLY BY AN S&E
[OPERATOR, THE [PRODUCTION OPERATORS
[ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR [MAINTAINING THE [SATELLITE [ACCUMULATION DRUMS
[IN ACCORDANCE WITH [RCRA REGULATIONS.
[(COMPLETE) 9/1/92.
2. DRUMS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE ON THE FLAMMABLE STORAGE PAD WERE NO LABELED WITH THE WORDS "HAZARDOUS WASTE" OR THE ACCUMULATION DATE. ADDRESS.
RHKJ 2. PROCEDURES HAVE [BEEN ESTABLISHED AND [TRAINING GIVEN TO [INSURE THAT NO [HAZARDOUS WASTE IS [STORED ON THE [FLAMMABLE STORAGE |PAD. THE S&F [OPERATORS ARE [RESPONSIBLE FOR [RECEIVING ALL [HAZARDOUS WASTE FROM [PRODUCTION'S
NGC 12522
AUDIT-PC 1.51
Company: BFCOODRICH Facility: HENRY
Worksheet
Priraatech Inc Page: 4
Session: 1 08-10-92
Revision: 0 10-2G-92
System: 3 SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dwg#:
----------------------------------------- ------------------------------- +--------------------------- +----+--------------------------- .
QUESTION
;a;
remarks
+ -+-------------------------------
RECOMMENDATIONS J BY
COMMENTS
I OPERATIONS.
J(COMPLETE) 9/1/92.
CONTAMINATED !MATERIAL, CONTAINED 5IN DRUMS LOCATED ON ;thb flammable iSTORAGE PAD, HAS NOT {BEEN DETERMINED TO ;be a hazardous or ;HONHAZABDOUS WASTE. !RESOLVE.
MK]3. ALL DRUMS THAT ;were hazardous or ;special waste were \labeled accordingly ;and moved to proper :STORAGE LOCATION. (COMPLETE) 9/1/92
J4. ONE BULK !CONTAINER OF WASTE {WAS IDENTIFIED AS JCONTAINING A ;HAZARDOUS WASTE BUT JWAS NOT LABELED AND SDID not have an ;ACCUMULATION DATE. ;LABEL.
MK!4 THE BOX IN 'QUESTION WAS LABELED ;the same day and was '.SHIPPED 8/21/92. JTHEBE ARE '.INDICATIONS THAT THE 5 MATERIAL PRESENTLY !BEING DISPOSED OF IN ;the container is no :longer HAZARDOUS J SINCE THE MATERIAL JWHICH MADE IT !HAZARDOUS IS NOW !SOLD AS OFF-GRADE ;PRODUCT, we are in
jthe process of
:CHARACTERIZING THE {WASTE. (DMK, SDJ) {12/1/93.
{5. A DRUM OF {HAZARDOUS WASTE IN !THE LABORATORY {SATELLITE `.ACCUMULATION AREA {WAS NOT CLOSED WIT {A LID, REMEDY.
DMK{5. PROCEDURES AND !CHECKS ARE IN PLACE ',TO INSURE THAT LIDS {ARE CLOSED AT ALL ! TIMES ON SA'TELLITE {ACCUMULATION DRUMS {EXCELPT WHF.N BEING {FILLED. (COMPLETE) {9/1/92.
{6. POTENTIALLY
1 REUSABLE MATERIALS
{WERE STORED IN DRUM
{LABELED "SCRAP" AN
{"Waste"
the
DMK{6. ALL DRUMS HAVE {BEEN LABELED {PROPERLY ACCORDING {TO THEIR CONTENTS {ANU MOVED TO PROPER
NGC 12523
AUDIT-PC 1.51
Company: B FGOODRICH Facility: HENRY
Worksheet
Piitnatech Inc Page: 5
Session: 3 08-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26-92
System: 3 SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dwg#:
QUESTION
;a;
remarks
; recommendations
{BY {
COMMENTS
{
l1 1
1 1
;;
{FLAMMABLE STORAGE
1
{STORAGE AREAS.
{
4 4
;!
{PAD. CORRECT.
l 1
{(COMPLETE 1 8/21/92. {
1
11
1
{2. WASTE OIL WAS SENT TO A
;c;the facility
;7. correct
{DMK{7. 11/92: PERMISSION;
!FACILITY WHICH WAS NOT
; {DISPOSED OF WASTE ;
4 t
{WAS RECEIVED FROM
{
{AUTHORIZED BY BFC.
4 4
1 4
; soil at an oil
{ {RECYCLING FACILITY J {THAT WAS not
; { :
1 1
{JIM LEWIS BY PHONE {
1 1
{PRIOR TO SHIPPING
{
1 4
{THE USED OIL TO
{
1
{ {INCLUDED ON THE
4 4
{SAFETY KLEEN. THE {
t t
5 {FACILITY'S LIST OF J
1 4
{DATE PERMISSION WAS {
1 i
{ {APPROVED TREATMENT, {
1 t
{GRANTED WAS NOT
{
4 1
{ {STORAGE AND DISPOSAL;
l 4
{DOCUMENTED.
4
{ {(TSD) FACILITIES.
{
4 1
{(COMPLETE) 10/27/92.5
+ ------------------------------------------------------------------- 4--4---------------------------------------------- +----------------------------------------------- ------ *---------------- ------------------------------ *
Session: 1 08-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26-92
System: 4 DRINKINC WATER MANAGEMENT
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dvgt:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4-4----------------------------------------------------------------------4----------------------------------------------------------------------- 4----------4----------------------------------------------------------------------+
QUESTION
{a; REMARKS
{ RECOMMENDATIONS
; by 1
COMMENTS
{
. SAMPLING RESULTS WERE NOT EPORTED TO THE STATE WITHIN 0 DAYS.
2. THERE IS NO DOCUMENTATION THAT POTABLE WATER SYSTEM IS 'LEAD FREE".
**
: c;
ii i
i
<
ii
i
ii 41
ri
;p; ii ti
t i
it ii t
ii
ii 41
*4 4
1( 11
41 1i
l 1l
1t %|
%
11 11
1
'f 11 <1 1i
ii
1( %t
* {1. RESOLVE
4 1 1 1 ( 1 4
{2. GENERATE
{DOCUMENTATION
1 1 1 1
4l
1 t 1 t 1 1 4 1 1 t 4 l '
**
*
J DMK {1. 11/92: VOC DATA {
1l {WAS SUBMITTED TO THE
1t {PUBLIC HEALTH
1 4
{DEPARTMENT.
1 >
{(COMPLETE) 10/20/89.
:DMK:2. 11/92: NO RECORDS
1
{ARE AVAILABLE TO
t
1
{DETERMINE IF "LEAD
1 1
{FREE" SOLDER AND
1 1
{FLUX HAS BEEN USED
1 1
{IN THE POTABLE WATER
1
{SYSTEM SINCE JUNE
1
{19, 1986. A
1 {MONITORING PROCEDURE
1 1
{WILL BE ESTABLISHED
1 1
{FOR LEAD IN THE
{POTABLE WATER.
{NOTICE WILL BE
I {POSTED FOR POSSIBLE
(
{LEAD CONTAMINATION
j 1
{IN DRINKINC WATER.
t {PROCEDURES WILL BE
{ESTABIISHED TO {INSURE THAT "LEAD
: VHF.E" PIPES . SOLDER , J AND F'UX ARF. USED IN
4-- ---------------- - ________ ______________________
\;
______________ __________ __________ 4________ _____
_______- . -
'
-------- ,
; VLI. FUTURE CHANGES
4------------------------- -- ----------------------------------------
NOC 12524
AUDIT-PC 1.51'
Worksheet
Primatech Inc.
Company: BKGOODRICH Facility: HENRY
Page: 6
Session; 1 0S-1Q-92
Revision: 0 10-26-92
System: 4 DRINKING WATER MANAGEMENT
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dwgf:
1 QUESTION
;a: REMARKS
! RECOMMENDATIONS J BY ;
COMMENTS
;
1l
<t 11
1 11 1 14
t \\
t1
4 14 if
J 3. THERE WAS NO NOTIFICATION 1 POSTED INFORMING PERSONNEL OF !THE LEAD CONTENT IN THE 1 DRINKING WATER.
; p; ii
ii it ii
i1 i4
1 1
j ;to the drinkinc
;
1 1
J JWATER SYSTEM. (DMK) J
l
\ \ 12/31/92.
;
1
I! 3. POST NOTIFICATIONJDMKJ3. SEE ITEM 2 ABOVE.',
4
;;
;
4 41 4 4 4t 4
1 1
4
!4. THE FACILITY HAS NOT JDEMONSTRATED THAT THE WATER 1 SYSTEM IS "LEAD FREE".
41
; p:
4f
14
4
4 1
4. address
i 4
IDMK',4. SEE ITEM 2 ABOVE.;
t1
t| 44
^ 1
4 1V
)5. NON-POTABLE WATER SYSTEM ISJPJ
;not labeled
44
i% 44
1 4| 1 11
1 44 4 4
1 41 t
1 1
I1 14
r 44 i ti
4 tI 1 4
1 4l t 41
1 4C 1 44
+---------------------------- ----------------- + - +
15. LABEL
1 1
r 1
i l
1 i
i r
i
JDMK55. 11/92: A FLOW
\
; ;DIAGRAM OF THE
;
I JPOTABLE WATER SYSTEM;
I ;WILL BE DEVELOPED BY!
; ;s/31/93. labeling is;
; ;presently" being done;
; ;to prevent
;
4
< i
r i 4 1
--------------------------------------- <
1 ;INADVERTENT
\
; |CONSUMPTION OF NON- J
; ;POTABLE WATER. (DMK)[
; ;s/3i/93.
;
-------- ----------- ------------+---+
Sesaioiv. 1 06-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26-92
System: 5 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dvg#:
I QUESTION
:a:
!1. THERE ARE NO WRITTEN ;PROCEDURES FOR ENSURING AIK !POLLUTION SOURCE COMPLIANCE.
;p;
41 1|
11 1l
;; ;! ;; ;; ;; ;;
!; i:
;; ;;
REMARKS
; RECOMMENDATIONS
;by ;
COMMENTS
1
!1. ISSUE PROCEDURES ;dmk;i. n/92: all
;
1
1
; J EXISTINC WRITTEN
J
4
1
; ;PROCEDURES WILL BE !
(1 ; ;checked to determinf.;
1
t
; ;if procedures are in;
! PLACE TO INSURE
\
; ;proper operation of ;
: '.THE POLLUTION
!
; :CONTROL DEVICES. ALL!
; ;air pollution
;
; :CONTROL DEVICES THAT!
X l
; ;are not included in ;
1 ; :WRITTEN PROCEDURES J
: ;WILL HAVE A
;
; ;PROCEDURE
;
: ;ESTABLISHED TO ; : INSURE PROPER
; :
NGC 12525
AUDIT-PC 1.51
Company: BFCOODRICH Facility: HENRY
Worksheet
Primatech Inc. Page: 7
Session: 1 08-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26-92
System: 5 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT
category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dvg#:
QUESTION
;a; REMARKS
RECOMMENDATIONS
BY
COMMENTS
[OPERATION. RECORDS [OF CONTROL DEVICE iMAINTENANCE (WHERE [ APPLICABLE) WILL BE !MAINTAINED. !(MEG,JDK) 8/31/93
Session: I 08-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26-92
System: 6 C0MMUNITY-RIGHT-TO-KN0W
category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dwgft:
QUESTION
;a; REMARKS
------------------------ -------------- ----_--+.
RECOMMENDATIONS [BY [
COMMENTS
1. THERE IS NO DOCUMENTATION C THAT SABA 302 NOTIFICATION WAS SUBMITTED.
1. GENERATE DOCUMENTATION
DMKI1. 11/92: A COPY OF [THE SARA 302 [NOTIFICATION LETTER [SUBMITTED TO THE [SERC IS QN FILE IN [THE ENVIRONMENTAL [OFFICE. (COMPLETE) [5/6/87.
Session: 2 08-10-92 System: 7 HA2ARD COMMUNICATION
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Revision: 0 10-2C -92
Dwg#: ...----------- ------------ ------- ----------4-
.
QUESTION
!a; REMARKS
RECOMMENDATIONS [BY 1
COMMENTS
+ -+-
[1. BOXES OF pvc DISPERSION
1 p;
[STRAININGS
HAD
TWO
CONFLICTING
i i
i i
[HAZARD LABELS.
i
1
'1 <i
[ 1.
< 1
< 1 1 t
1 1
1 i
CORRECT
[DEG 1. THE GEON
f
[WAREHOUSE WILL BE
< 1
[AUDITED FOR
A 1
[NONCOMPLIANCE AND
1 1
[THE PACKAGING
1( [LABELING WILL BE
t [CORRECTED. (MEG)
1 1
[ 12/31/92.
Sesf: i on System
Cate gory
1 08-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26-
8 INDUSTRIAL HYCIENE MANAGEMENT
RECOMMENDATIONS
Dvs# :
QUESTION
recommendation:
! hY ;
COMMENTS
J1. APPROXIMATELY FIVE r 5) :percent of twa exposure ; MON ITOH f N'G RESULTS FOR VINYI. [CHLORIDE EXCEEDED THE PEL [WITHOUT RESP IR.VVORi
1. MAINTAIN FOLLOWUP DEC:1. PLANT CURRENTLY
PROGRAM
[CONDUCTS BOARD OF
[INQUIRES WHENEVER AN
[INDIVIDUAL EXCEEDS
[PEL WITHOUT
NGC 12526
AUDIT-I'C 1.51'
Company: RFCOODRICH Facility: HENRY
Worksheet
Primatech Inc. Page: S
Session: 1 08-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26-92
System: 8 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE MANAGEMENT
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dwg#:
i QUESTION'
;aj
!PROTECTION.
4 4 1 4 1 4 1 1 1 4 1 4 1 1 1 1 1
!2. PROCEDURE FOR "YELLOW
;LIGHT" ALARM DOES NOT ENSURE
!EXPOSURES WILL BE LESS THAN
1 THE PEL.
1 t 1 1 %
1
1 f 1
14 1t t* 44
1 4t i 14
44 41 1I 14
ia
tt
ii fr
i 4 41 t4
44
;p;
l ta
i c 4 i1 44 4t
1t l1
1\ 4*
t1 fI
t1 (1
<t 1 44 44
13. THERE IS NOT A FORMAL HEAT
!STRESS PROGRAM. J ( 4 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 T 1 t
14. DOCUMENTATION FOR ;INVESTIGATING STS'S WAS [DX SOKGANIED AND INCOMPLETE
1 a i 1
11
[P[
11 41 14 4 4t
1 % 1 1* t4 t* (1 4 11 14 4l
1(
;p;
ii t >i (t a i i i i i*
i> ii tt ii
i .
REMARKS
[ RECOMMENDATIONS
:BY [
COMMENTS
{
1 f
a 4
1 a
4 4
l 4
4 1
1 1
1 1
1 t
4 1
1
; 2. CORRECT
i a i r
!; i i i i i
i
i
3.
1 a a
t
A
ADDRESS
1 1 * 1 a i 4
1
1 4 ADDRESS
t a >
a 1
; ;
[ [RESPIRATORY
! J EQUIPMENT. ACTION
; '.ITEMS DESIGNED TO
1 !ELIMINATE THE OVER-
; ;exposure are ; GENERATED AND
:
[FOLLOW
UP OCCURS
[ JAS PART OF OUR BOI
! I PROGRAM. (CONTINUING
; [1 COMPLETE )
ia [DEGJ2. ALTERNATIVES ARE ! !BEING INVESTIGATED [ !TO INSURE THAT [ :PERSONNEL ARE NOT
| EXPOSURED TO GREATER 1 |THAN THE PEL WITHOUT *, JUSE OF A RESPIRATOR [ [WHILE PERFORMING [ [WORK UNDER A YELLOW [ [LIGHT. (MEG/RDM 1
[ [3/1/93.
[DEG[3. A PLANT SAFETY
[ [POLICY WILL BE [ [ISSUED IDENTIFYING [ [THE CURRENT TRAININ
[ PROGRAM PLUS [ [ADDITIONAL [ [ADMINISTRATIVE AND [ [EQUIPMENT CONTROLS. [ [(DEG) 6/1/93.
[DEG[4. A PLANT PROCEDUR
[ [WILL
ISSUED
[IDENTIFYING THE
[ [ADMINISTRATION OF [ [STS'S AND HEARING
[ [ RECORDABI l.ITY. THE [ [PROCEDURE WILL
[ [INCLUDE THE
[ [DOCUMENTATION
[ [P.EQUIREMENTS. (DEG : ; 12/31/92.
NGC 12527
AURIT-PC 1.51'
Company: BFCOODRICH Facility: HENRY
Worksheet
Priraatech Inc
Session: 1 08-10-92 System: 9 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY'
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Revision: 0 11-04-92
Dwg#:
QUESTION
: a;
REMARKS
{ RECOMMENDATIONS
{ BY {
COMMENTS
{
1. SEVERAL EXIT SICNS WERE NOT ;p:
ILLUMINATED.
ii
ii
41 1 41 41
1t 1I
41 I1
ii a
< ii
i Ai
a
4
i
ii 41
a4 t
1 11 41 1
2. PALLETS IN PVC SACK AREA WERE BOWED.
3. EYEWASH STATIONS WERE UNCLEAN.
VI
;c;
ii ii
14 14
ti ai c| i
a4 41
1t
|
%
t1
11
14 ai
4t ti
4l 11
1
(
I 4t
\ 14
( 4
: p;
41 a4
<4
4t
4i 1|
1|
44
41 i
1I
1
.
1i
1t
14 tl
\'
{ 1. COMPLETE EXIT
'.SIGN 1( 11 1 4 1 1 44 14 4 1 4 1 1 4 41 44 <
1
t
1
PROGRAM
h !;2. ADDRESS
f
11 1i 1i 1 1 ii 11 4t 1
4
14 4
t
: 3 ADDRESS ti
4
4
t 4 1
1
;deg;i. the present
;
; Sprogram to replace ; ; {existing exit signs ;
4 ITHAT do not meet the;
aa ;illumination
;
44 ;requirements will be;
1 4
;completed along with;
t
1
;the auditinc of exitj_
41 ;signs that are
;
41 ;located on the
;
41
;DOORS. SIGNS that
;
1 1
;are not visible when;
(1 '.THE DOOR IS OPEN
4
{WILL BE RELOCATED.
aa {(DEG) 12/31/92.
;
;deg;2. the wooden
:
c 1
I PALLETS THAT WERE
1
44 '.BOWING IN THIS
{
a {APPLICATION HAVE
{
a
{BEEN TAKEN OUT OF
{
4 4
{service, in addition;
1 {THE SUPER SACKS ARE {
44 {BEING STACKED IN A {
4 {MANNER SO THAT
{
4
4
{INDIVIDUALS ARE NOT {
4 {PHYSICALLY EXPOSED {
1
4
{TO A SECOND LEVEL OF{
1 1
{BAGS. (COMPLETE)
{
1
4
{8/14/92.
;deg;3. each production {
{AREA WILL BE
4 {RESPONSIBLE FOR THE {
41 {CLEANING OF
1
4
{EYEBATHS.
{
4 t
{LONG RANGE
i {THE PORCELF. 1 N
{
1
1
{EYEBATHS WILL BE
{
1 {CHANGED OUT WITH
{
: {MORE MODERN NON-BOWL{
; {DESIGNS. [MEG/JDK) {
; '.12/31/92.
NGC 12528