Document 6byO5g8rjoR9oKG5O05z29469
LAW OFFICES
KELiER AND HECKMAN
JOSEPH E, KELLER JEROME H HECKMAN
11SO !7T." STREET, N. W
CHARLES M MEEHAN
SUITE lOOO
WILLIAM II BORO HE SAN I, JR HOUERT ft.TIERNAN
WASHINGTON, ID. C. 20036
WAYNE V BLACK DAVID I. HILL MARTIN W BEHCOVICI
October 10, 1972
MARC K SHAVE
LEI.AND J BLAIR PETER M NEMKOV
Hearing
Clerk
Department of Health, Education and Welfare
Room 6-88
5600 Fishers Lane
Rockville, Maryland 20852
TELEPHONE SOS C9<>-2700 CABLE ADDRESS 'KELMAN
Re: Food and Drug Administration "Proposal Regarding Regulation of Prior Sanctioned Food In gredients"; 37 Fed. Reg. 16407
Dear Sir:
Pursuant to Section 4 of the Administrative Procedure Act, as amended, 5 U.S.C. 553 (cj, and the referenced Food and Drug Administration Notice of Proposed Rulemaking published on August 12, 1972, The Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc. (SPI), by its attorneys, and acting through its Food, Drug and Cosmetic Packaging Materials Committee, 1/ hereby
-/ The Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc. (SPI)
is a Corporation organized under the Membership Cor poration Law of the State of New York. It is composed of approximately 1200 member companies and individuals who supply raw materials; process or manufacture plas tics or plastics products; engineer or construct molds or similar accessory equipment for the plastics in dustry; and engage in the manufacture of machinery used to make plastics products or materials of all types. SPI is the major national trade association of the plastics industry, its membership being re sponsible for an estimated 75% of the total dollar volume of sales of plastics in this country. The Food and Drug Administration is quite familiar with the con stitution and activities of the Society as a result of our many filings and participation in other proceedings of direct consequence to plastics producers. Copies of SPI membership directories, organization charts, (con't.)
ASI-pr 0001254
2
respectfully submits its views with regard to the above-designated proposed amendment to Part 121 of the Food and Drug Administration's Regulations.
I INTRODUCTION AND PRELIMINARY
STATEMENT OF POSITION
The Society is in general agreement with the intent of the subject proposal. We believe it is both helpful and appropriate to publicly list those materials for which prior sanctions have been issued subject to the expressed understanding that the absence of a material from listing under Subpart E of Part 121 does not affect the prior sanctioned status of such a material. Furthermore, the Society is proposing that Subpart E of Part 121 be further amended to include those resins which have been listed as prior sanctioned on pages 2 and 3 of the SPI Bul letin "Good Manufacturing Practices" Criteria for Plastic Resins "Prior Sanctioned" Under the Food Ad ditives Amendment of 1958, March 1963, a copy of which is attached.
Furthermore, we respectfully submit that this is an appropriate time to amend the nomenclature of one resin and one plasticizer which appeared first in the referenced Lehman list and were then carried over to the list of resins in the attached SPI Bulletin, or in the present Regulation 121.2001(E). We are not proposing here that new substances be added to the prior sanction list; but rather that the published names of two listed substances be changed to conform to present standards of scientific nomenclature.
Finally, we believe it would further the pur poses intended by the subject proposed rulemaking if the Food and Drug Administration were to add to the proposed publicly affirmed prior sanction list the widely used basic resin styrene-acrylonitrile co polymer (SAN).
--/ (con't) and the like have been supplied to FDA in connection with some of these filings. Any further background information desired can be supplied immediately upon request by the Food and Drug Administration.
ASI-PR 0001255
3
II ABSENCE FROM LISTING MUST NOT AFFECT PRIOR SANCTION STATUS
Section 201 (s) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act excludes from the definition of "food additive," and therefore excludes from the requirement that food additives be regulated, "[a]ny substance used in accordance with a sanction or approval granted prior to the enactment of this paragraph..." Inasmuch as the Act does not require that this prior sanction or approval be confirmed or published by the Food and Drug Administration, we believe that the exempt status under Section 201 (s) cannot properly be affected by publication as set forth in the proposed rulemaking. Accordingly, in the interest of clarifying the status of all such materials, we propose that 121.2000 General be amended to include a new subparagraph to
be lettered (b) and relettering the present (b) as (c) as follows:
121.2000 General
**
*
(b) The prior sanction status of Food ingredients will not be affected under Section 201 (s) of the Act merely by virtue of such ingredient not being listed in Subpart E of Part 121.
**
*
III INCLUSION OF RESINS LISTED AS PRIOR SANCTIONED BY SPI
Shortly after the enactment of the Food Ad ditives Amendment of 1958, and in response to a widely felt need in the plastics industry, SPI pub lished a Bulletin defining "good manufacturing practices" for polymers. These criteria were com piled for those resins which were published in the
ASI-PR 0001256
4
widely disseminated Lehman list.2/ These resins, with the exception of polyethylene, were reaffirmed as "prior sanctioned" by the Food and Drug Adminis tration in a letter dated July 22, 1960. A copy of this letter is included in the Bulletin which is attached to these Comments. Since the list on pages 2 and 3 of the Bulletin has not only been affirmed but has also been widely referenced by the Food and Drug Administration in the years subsequent to 1958 as a listing of prior sanctioned resins, we believe it is prudent at this time to propose formally that all the resins listed in the Bulletin on pages 2 and 3, and conforming to the end characteristics set forth in the Bulletin, be listed in the proposed Subpart E, 121.2xxx.
At the time Dr. Lehman published his article, the resin known commercially as Saran was popularly, but somewhat inaccurately, considered to be polyvinylidene chloride. When the SPI Bulletin was prepared, his ternunology was maintained, and "Polyvinylidene Chloride" is listed as item 5 in the SPI Bulletin. However, the resin then and now was and is a vinylidene chloride-vinyl chloride copolymer and is more properly designated as poly(vinylidene chloride-co-vinyl chloride). Accordingly, The Society of the Plastics Industry respectfully submits that item 5 in the list of resins which is now being proposed for inclusion in the proposed Subpart E, be amended to correct the nomenclature without any change in the listed end characteristics, as follows:
5. Poly (vinylidene chloride-co-vinyl chloride)
IV PROPOSAL TO LIST POLY (STYRENE-CO-ACRYLONITRILE)
Subsequent to the publication of the Lehman list, but prior to the enactment of the Food Additives Amendment of 1958, several chemical companies
Lehman, A.J., Quart. Bull. Assn. Food and Drug Officials of the United States, XX, No. 4, p. 159-168, October, 1956.
ASI-PR 0001257
5
submitted data regarding Poly (styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (SAN) to the Food and Drug Administration and requested its opinion regarding the safe use of this resin. The FDA agreed that the use of SAN as a food wrap was safe, and a sample of its letters which constitutes a prior sanction is attached.
Accordingly, The Society of the Plastics In dustry respectfully submits that the proposed Subpart E, 121.2xxx be further amended to include:
***
121.2xxx Poly (styrene-co-acrylonitrile) Total residual monomer is primarily styrene and is less than 0.6% as determined by a method for residual styrene monomer as given in 121.2510(d).
V CHANGE OF PLASTICIZER NOMENCLATURE
As evidenced by the exchange of correspondence between the Food and Drug Administration and The Dow Chemical Company, copies of which are attached for ease in reference, it appears that the name of the plasticizer which is presently listed in Regulation 121.2001(E) as 3-(2-Xenoyl)-1,2-epoxy propane should be amended to more accurately conform to the usage prescribed by Chemical Abstracts. Accordingly, The Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc. respectfully submits that the name of the plasticizer be changed from that quoted above to: 3 (2-xenoxy)-1,2 epoxy propane.
VI SUMMARY
The Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc. urges the adoption of the subject proposal in sub stantially the form set forth but respectfully sub mits that it would more readily achieve its intended
ASX~PR 0001258
6 purpose by including the amendments explicitly pro posed in Sections II, III, IV and V above.
Respectfully submitted. meral Counsel for The Society
of the Plastics Industry, Inc. Of Counsel:
Keller and Heckman 1150 17th Street, N.W. Washington, D. C. 20036
ASI-PR 0001259
DEPARTMENT OF
HEALTH, EDUCATION. AND WELFARE
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
WASHINGTON 21. D. C.
March 27, 1957
The Dow Chemical Company Attention: Mr. D. D. McCollister Biochemical Research Department
12-634 Building Midland, Michigan
RECEIVED
Af'f! 1 13SR1>
Biocnem, Kes. ^epi.
Gentlemen:
Tour letter of March 15, 1957, addressed to Hr. L. L. Ramsey, has been referred to us for reply.
Relying on the data and information you have submitted, ve agree that Styrex 767 (a copolymer of styrene and acrylonitrile) is acceptable as a packaging material involving direct contact with foods.
Sincerely yours,
iester T. Hubble Assistant to the Director Bureeu of Enforcement
ASI PR 0001260