Document 6ZQJ5mX1vx6XN6dDLJz4vXRE

FLED.C/ LOCK AURORA DE LA. GARZA D!ST CLERK JAN 1 8 2001 CAUSE NO. 2000-05-1962-C DISTRICT COURT OF CAMERON COUNTY TEXAS ROBERT HENRY VILLARREAL. Individual!) and as Personal Representative of the Heirs and Estate of JOHN HENRY El vim 5. Oilu- u IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VILLARREAL Plaintiffs. \ s. CAMERON OAF CORPORATION HOLDINGS. INC.). ET AL. Defendants. 197TM JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANTS' LINE AND PAGE DESIGNATIONS Defendants Dana Corporation. Quigley Company. Inc.. TAiN Ltd (f/k/a T&N pic and Turner k Newell pic). Union Carbide Corporation d/b/a Union Carbide Chemicals and Plastic^. Inc. and United States Gypsum Company, hereinafter referred to as "Defendants". Line and Page Designations to the above referenced cases. Respectfully submitted. POWERS & FROST. L.L.P. 0 ((X___________ James H. Powers Texas State Bar No. 16217400 Sharia J. Frost Texas State Bar No. 07491 100 Gwendolyn S. Frost Texas State Bar No. 07488750 2600 Two Houston Center 909 Fannin Houston. Texas 77010 Telephone: ('713)767-1555 Facsimile: ('7131 767-P99 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS CERTIFICATE OF SERV ICE 1 ncreh\ certirT that a true and correct of Defendants' Line and Page Designations has been forvmraed to Plaintiffs' counsel of record either b> first class mail, return receipt requested, delivers or facsimile on this the _o__da> of . . 2001. i'K ; anuT-'n ' il.andd j^nr IX'itnc.tnc-Lin:- jnc Mjl-: i^t-M unjth'n:, Ui-c DEFENDANT'S LINE AND PAGE DESIGNATIONS DEFENDANTS Deposition testimon\ of Dr. Elvin E. Adams, m Robert Solomon v. Armstrong. Inc.. No. TY-S4-3L|-CA. in the L.S. Distnct Court lor the Eastern District: of Texas. Tyier Division, as follow s: Paste 1 8 11 1 lr r is 28 54 56 59 61 64 6" 68 69 '1 ~~ y '6 Si S6 s~ Ml Line 0 17 14 11 5 16 S" 0 14 12 15 9 9 10 6 7 13 S 10 4 21 21 y Throueh Puae o 11 12 15 1/ IS "V "1 44 55 58 60 63 66 67 6S 70 76 76 S5 86 88 41 Line y 1I y 4 _ 15 "7 12 13 15 11 17 1 25 9 y 13 1 25 1 *i 4 16 Videotape deposition testimon) of Steven M. Ayers. M.D. in In re Asbestos Personal lmur\ Cases in the following courts: Circuit Court of Baltimore City. Maryland. Circuit Court for Wasningion County. Maryland: Circuit Court for Prince Georges County. Maryland: Circuit Court for Cecil Count). Maryland: Circuit Court for St. Mars's Count). Maryland: Superior Court of Washington. Distnct of Columbia. Civil Division; Circuit Court of Allegnan) Count). Mar\ land: United Staies Distnct Court for the Distnct of Columbia: United States Distnct Court of Maryiand. and Circuit Court for Baltimore Count). Marxland BCA 1 through 4. taken on Auaust K1 through August 12. 19S9 in Baltimore. Mars land. " r! - -rider, vii.jr'v. . Jk'nn'r^icnuJm.'-Liti. tine !*jor lEMjnjiu.'n - cks. Pane 17 IS 20 21 46 4S 54 56 56 58 60 62 62 64 64 65 65 66 b~ 64 64 69 70 Line Through 20 15 16 19 12 10 17 20 12 Q 14 15 11 15 10 10 16 10 ~C| So K >. 4,Tlir" IS 11 1 5 15 16 14 .i u.nr-i >0 lonc.jri' anu 1 ..`cMjr.Jin'n-ci(\. Paye 15 18 20 21 24 47 48 48 49 54 56 56 58 60 62 62 64 64 65 65 65 67 67 69 69 70 "4 74 75 ^8 50 51 Line 14 15 IS 16 9 13 4 11 3 19 8 14 20 \ 19 15 19 4 10 16 o 16 ->'i 16 13 19 6 12 19 Pa< 8i 62 8?' 88 86 S" SS S'9 89 90 90 93 94 94 95 95 96 96 9? 9~ 98 99 100 100 101 101 102 102 102 103 1 )? 10? ' 104 104 105 105 ` 106 106 1CT 10S 109 1 iO !;! Line 21 9 5 21 10 8 15 1 5 is 19 -v 4 10 1? 17 ' 3 19 9 1? 13 16 .n3 20 13 21 6 10 16 "" 13 18 8 17 1 12 IS > 5 6 s Through --,, Page S2 S3 83 86 87 SS . SS 89 90 90 92 93 94 95 95 96 96 97 97 97 99 100 100 101 101 102 102 102 103 103 103 104 104 104 105 105 106 107 107 109 109 111 11 1 .. 'k C jriivror, v i! ..irrjj .<>T.n ;K-i-TiCjni.--Line unJ I ^csisrnjunn- uik. Line 7 IS 8 6 13 20 12 17 -- 11 S S 15 1 16 6 11 17 14 1 17 1 19 4 S 14 5 10 16 6 14 20 9 21 11 1 15 21 S 10 :i :i 09 SI S i: 8 i: 6 C 9 C LI 9 H 01 i: ii 11 9 9! _I SI 91 :i i: r 9 SI 6 it 11 Q o: s SI c i: tL. 3Ur[ >ir 'iuoiirur'i1-'<' v'",j our 'UH-'iurr'M'i.ij; JU-'f -o- ^ j.'t.-'i;:- ' 991 H v. 9r i 991 I -w -' 1i 191 81 1 9i 191 01 191 191 t I 91 091 01 091 091 9 091 091 f . or! SH 91 8t I 8fl H _ri it-1 6 9t I 9t~ I P 9r i 91? I 8 rn et-i 8 9ri 9h il OH OH 91 OH OH L- OH 691 61 691 691 9 9! i9I 8 i9T I i 991 61 99! 991 09 191 191 81 091 091 H 691 691 <. 691 891 w 891 891 8 i91 i9I 19 991 991 9 991 991 91 991 991 61 99! i_ o I 9! 991 191 6 191 191 r 191 091 01 01 I 611 L 61 1 81 1 81 ill ill 91 H I 911 01 91 I 9II J4- 91 i 911 91 I I 1 qr>noai|x 2Ui~] Oonj 152 IS? 15? 1 5? 154 154 155 155 156 156 156 156 15" 15" 158 159 159 159 160 160 161 . 161 162 162 16? 16? 164 165 165 165 166 166 1 66 166 Line 21 N 12 19 8 14 15 20 4 6 11 15 1 12 IS s 14 21 16 19 9 IS 12 15 10 12 1 12 20 4 11 16 18 , Through Page 15? 15? 153 154 154 154 155 156 156 156 156 157 158 159 159 159 160 160 161 161 162 162 163 164 164 165 165 166 166 166 Line > 10 17 6 12 15 IS 2; 9 13 20 10 16 6 12 19 14 17 / 16 10 13 S 1 20 10 18 h 9 13 Tr.al Tesumon\ of Dr. James D. Crapo in Paul Cochran vs. Keene Corporation, et al.. Cause No. A-9? 1.139-C. in the 12Sth Judicial District Court of Orange County. Texas on February 23. 1996. as follow s: Pace Line Through Page Line '.VK ( .irtv.-ron \ li.jrrca. Junr. 1 -j!'c;ijjni.'-L:n-2 a:iC !`uL'f ! c^^nain'ih Liv. Page "46 "4" "54 "65 ~66 "76 Line 5 24 17 14 IS T'nroueh Page ~47 "59 764 766 774 780 Line 20 12 25 14 9 24 Deposition tesumon\ of lrb\ Eldridge in Marv Jovce Lose v Johns-Vlanville Sales Corporation et al. and otner. Civil Action No. CV-80-002789. Circuit Coun of the Thirteenth Judicial Distnc; of Alabama. Mobile Count), taken on Ma> 25. 1981 as follows: Page Line Through Pase Line 1 1 O' 1 r 20 21 9 1, 16 26 13 30 / 38 13 40 9 20 1 1 21 19 *> ^ 26 1 28 1 . 30 20 39 "y 41 n/ Deposition of Dr. Milton Gray in Charles Hatie\ Newman \. Ravmark. et al.. No. M-79-124-CA. m the L.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Marshall Division. as follows: Pane *> 26 28 30 36 46 48 ' Line 16 S 11 20 3 20 11 Through Page -<v 25 27 28 26 14S 4S Line 1" 21 J> 10 17 17 21 11 2? '' i-'. uriicmr . iI.jit.'j! .mt r [^ol'-cncjnt'-Lin u .inc ICit -8Lr.anuns ck Deposition testimonx of Dr. Milton Gra\ in Henrx E Holland, et a!. \ . John s-Manx'ilie. et al.. No. M-SO-1 52-CA. iri the I'.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Marshall Di vision, as follows: PiiLlC Line Through Pane Line 10 14 11 IS i: 11 15 10 19 6 26 26 24 3S 20 40 11 53 9 58 15 SO 23 ` 0 19 96 1T 1 25 10 24 12 1 13 24 15 13 20 1 1 26 20 "X -- 21 38 25 41 54 13 59 17 81 20 91 20 97 173 13 Deposnior. testimonx of Dr. Milton Gray in Philip L. Cano, et ux v. Ravmark. et al.. taken November 2 !. 19S3. No C-S3-49-CA. ini the U.S. District Court for the Southern District Texas. Corpus Chnsti Division, as follows 1J vC Pa^e 14 -\ " 2S Line 19 23 12 1 Through Paee 7 23 2S 2S 29 Line 20 11 4 17 7 Deposition testimonx of Dr. Milton Gras iin Chariie Hatlex Nexvman. et a! v. Johns Manvilie. af. in tne L.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Marshall Division, as follows' Pace ' Line Through Pane Line 16 - -> S 26 D *s ~ It .1 20 30 7 . 3 17 25 21 D *7 *; 28 10 29 ii --. 32 17 -g <rfi '' !j jru ''Go- D-ML'njLcns doc Pace 36 40 4S Line 20 11 *> Throucn Pace -- 48 48 Line 21 11 23 Deposition testimonv of Dr. Milton Gra\ in Edith Jenkins and Cari E. Jenkins v . Johns-Man Sales Corporation, et al. . Civil Action No. TV-79-6i-CA. in the L.S. Distnct Coun for the Eastern Distnct of Texas. Tvier Division, as follows: Pace 11 13 20 Line 13 13 12 Throush Pace 14 16 20 Line 5 19 19 Deposition testimom of Dr. Stanley Donald Greenberg taken in Gemt Spruit v. The Celotex Corporation, et al.. Ci\il Action No. CA3-S5-1979-D. in the U.S. District Court for the Nonhem District of Texas. Dallas Division, as follows: Pace Line Through Pace Line 6 - 13 18 25 34 33 .1 -> 46 30 31 36 38 39 6? " S *> 21 10 23 13 6 24 \ 10 16 11 12 4 -7 5 10 6 12 7 *7 13 2S 23 16 34 9 34 42 8 44 14 4S *7 50 23 "s -\ 9 5TM 25 3S 24 3 21 63 - IU - " ' K v. .irtvjr.T, \ n.ar'.'ai ionn vi 'dicriidanl..'-L:ru jnJ i'ciut: iJcML'nauorts ac< .>ip 'uoiiruii'-.~r pur u:p ;urpu.':.'f ; Liu: r p.'jjr*;! u. :,\jr ,-( _ . - |- T - wC tt LI ii 91 6 g i: Cv 11 9| St t 6 01 61 11 01 t 9 SI 01 t-I tSI L 91 6 91 II 91 9! SI t: 'r s t- auq -01 :oi 001 to Go 68 iS -'3 ts is os 9L "" / u, _ 0L 69 89 99 t9 ti 89 ii Cv 09 6t it it tt it ot 6i to 6c s: ;r 01 - 3org qi5nojq_[_ ii 9 3 9 it :i u. 9 91 91 0 1I 91 I 9 _ C c 91 L S u, c tl 61 91 -C q* -- S SI :i u. ti 11 s 01 ouig 901 il)i Oh tb Oh ss _g iS ts :s w_ 9l. l_ w u. _ Oi (-.9 S9 99 t9 _ i99 ' 93 19 ot St 9t 91 it U, Ot Si ti nC Si I h t 3olld :so\oj|oj so: i)S<if isnsny us^ni `uois'i \ 1(3 3[[I \UOSN3Hf TpUOIJ JO 1 3U1S1Q 3|ppq.\' 3U1 JOI unoj 13U1S1Q g i ui |n is uounjotiioj 3U33Nj \ q-.;r:g -] u?.irgj ui sriqq _L W3JDUV .10 \UOUillS31 UOlllSOllOQ Line Through Page Line 10- 10 i 1: 5 110 ! 20 1? 12" i: 14S 13 152 12 155 164 20 171 4 1 "7 1 .178 16 IS I 10 1 10 13 1 14 120 21 126 21 131 11 132 7 148 15 153 17 156 20 157 14 165 9 171 13 J 77 15 ISO S 182 1 Deposition testimony of Andrew T. Haas in In Re: Asbestos Cases, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Atlanta Division, taken August 22. 1980 as follows: , Page Line Through Page Lin: 6 20 20 14 13 38 12 42 18 44 1 45 17 51 1 1 IS 6 24 20 *> 32 4 41 8 43 10 47 24 49 1 1 51 IS 60 S Video deposition testimony of Horton Corwin Hinshaw. Sr.. M V taken November IS. 1984 through December 11. 1984. in In Re: Related Asbestos Cases. No. C-S3-6251-RFP (all cases), m the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California as follows: Page ' ' Line Through Page Line Volume 1 12 5 15 15 2! 26 15 12 20 21 25 3 :: ' 'K-1 .irruT.'n v Lurrcj. Jijnn Jj-Jk-nJjra.'-Linv JnL - 12 - i TjM-jnjin *n-uoc n- ( T "* -- 35 40 42 44 46 4" 50 53 54 58 59 60 68 6S 70 S3 S3 S5 86 88 101 103 10" 1 10 ! 10 i 10 111 1 13 121 123 126 128 12 130 132 Line 5 Q 1 19 14 15 26 -> -7 -> -- 20 ->7 14 S 11 8- *> *7 6 - 24 " 10 28 18 1 1 12 25 S 15 20 i "i S 28 2S 6 Through V olume 2 Page 32 36 38 41 44 45 ' 47 50 51 54 58 58 60 67 68 70 80 S3 85 85 88 91 10? 105 109 110 110 1 10 1 12 115 122 125 128 129 130 131 132 1J CO ' '`.jrnoron viharr-jj; Jonn.!>-ji~nc4n!'-Lm. aru. J iLr.jtu'ns joc Line i: 6 _/ 11 IS l 11 1 4 ~ 6 17 O 25 -O 10 20 3 13 20 15 12 18 10 9 17 27 28 10 14 14 13 19 > 19 28 Volume 5 Pace Line Throuch Pace Line 3$~ 24 403 IS 3 ST 28 404 ri Deposition testimony of Honon Corwin Hinshave. Sr.. M.D .. taken April 23. 1982 in Jimmie 1 Vauchan \. .lohns-Munville. et al.. No. CA3-S1-0070-F. in the L.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas as follows: Pace 9 13 19 21 24 D- 31 35 40 4? 46 50 51 61 SO S1A S5 88 Line 7 IS 25 ; T; . 7 23 23 12 S 9 1 19 10 > 16 9 Throuch Pace 12 14 20 "v -) 24 27 37 43 46 48 51 57 62 80 84 86 SS Line 11 12 14 20 15 9 18 *> 4 12 14 20 19 20 15 Defendants reserxe the nght to offer testimony identified by any party. Plaintiffs or Defendants Deposition testimonx of Dr. Forde A. Mclver in 0. L. Allen \. Fibreboard Corporation. No. BSl-2~6-CA. in the L.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Belaumont Dn ision. taken on April Q. 1982. Pace Line Throuch Pace Line 99 2S -is T T; 20 3' 20 10 11 2S 9 34 13 21 - 14 r- < < `K L jmcron V triai-cdl Jv'nnvlJciL'ncan'.'-Lin!. jni2 I`ate [X'siir.juons cu>. Page Line 8 20 s T'nrnueh Page 42 63 74 Line 14 15 12 Trial testimony of Joseph Ralph Shrode taken in ' Clarence Bore' \. Fibreboard Corporation. Civil Action No. 6446. in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, as follows: Page Line Through Page Line S5" 25 S5S i S59 i S62 14 S63 4 864 1 86S S * 869 1 S70 15 S71 1 r< t NO CO 858 25 S59 17 862 864 3 868 25 869 12 870 25 871 14 Tna! testimonv of Joseph Ralph Shrode taken in Clarence Borel \. Fibreboard Corporation. Cml Action No. 6449. in the L'.S. Distnct Court for the Eastern District of Texas, as follows: Pace 858 859 861 862 865 S66 86" 868. S"2 880 ' SSI Line 4 1 21 4 13 1 1 1 1 4 3 i Through Pace 858 S59 861 862 865 866 867 S6S 869 S"2 880 SSI Line r 25 25 25 2^ 25 25 12 13 2S 25 rj0\0 .c Deposition testimony of Ro\ Steinfurth in Jackie R. Starnes, ei ux \. Combustion Engineering. Inc., et ah. in the I'.S. District Court for the Eastern Distnct of Tennessee. Northeastern Division, taken VIa\ 25. 1981 as follows. - t\'R ( anv.M<'t' '' :]:anlvi. jonn 1 idi-'icjn'.--Lind .me f'jui. Iinjt>c Pace 4 5 0 - 1? 1? IT 18 24 40 43 45 48 *N % 60 62 66 69 '1 // 78 S7 S9 92 04 - Line IS 10 11 1 15 21 15 1 13 *> 19 9 11 -.1t - 1 13 20 20 9 11 7 6 21 > ihrouch Pase 5 6 6 10 1^ 14 18 20 24 42 43 46 48 5S 60 62 67 70 7^ 74 77 78 87 90 94 96 Line 8 6 16 12 1 T 12 21 8 > 4 16 16 12 11 S 11 11 11 19 10 "\ Deposition tesumonv of Johnnie M. Stoma in Johnnie M. Stoma \. Johns-Manville Sales Comoration. e: a!.. in the U.S. Distnct Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division, taken Oc tober 9. 19S1 as follows: Pace Line Through Putte Line S s 9 IS !9 20 "1 21 | 5 1 IS 1 15 1 21 1 9 / 25 8 S 25 9n IS 25 19 6 20 25 ^1 21 IS ^1 - 16 - *(\ `H f.umt;ron \ iI.ii.tvj' J inn.IX'iencynb-Lini: jnc Pail. jrjnjinjns aoc Pane "i -> 104 105 107 108 109 146 Line I 18 1 *> 1 1 6 Throutin Line 104 105 6 107 25 10S 25 109 "x 146 13 Deposition i estimom of Dr Hans Weill in Ernest Howell \. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation. e: aL No. M[-S0-169-CA. in the L.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Marshall Division, in the L.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Ty ier Dmsion. as follows: Pane Line Through Pane Line 4 10 14 17 " 15 16 _. 6 41 -i 46 IS 47 1 1 48 21 13 52 IS s ^ 17 6" 6 *> 12 14 89 15 t;"1 S 14 16 15 15 2? 40 23 46 1" 47 10 48 16 52 12 52 17 53 16 66 21 71 1 74 4 77 20 78 19 90 12 94 18 - . K` ' Hurr-jj, j.-nn .P^jivncjn1'-L.iru- jnc !'j_n !'csvjr.Jin n-. ji DEFENDANTS LIST OF POTENTIAL DEPOSITION AND TRIAL TESTIMONY 1. Edwin Aduddeil. tn tnal testimonv m Edwin Adudde! \ Armstrong World Industries, Inc., et al.. Civil Action No. CA3-85-1207-H. in the L.S Distnci Court for the Northern District of Texas. Dallas Division. 2. Edwin Aduddeil. bv deposition testimonv of in Edwin Aduddeil v Armstrong World Industnes. Inc., et al.. Civil Action No. CA3-85-1207-H. in the United States District Coun for the Nonhem District of Texas. Dallas Division, taken on January 6. I9S" 3. Dr. Steven Avres. bv tnal testimonv in Lovd Galveston 92. Civil Action No. G-S2-144. in the L.S. Distnct Coun for the Southern Distnct of Texas. Galveston Div ision. 4. Dr. Steven Avres. bv tnal testimon} m William J. Komegav v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, et al.. Civil Action No. GS1-131 (consolidatedi m the L.S. Distnct Coun for the Southern Distnct of Texas. Galveston Division. 5. Dr. Ham Demopolous. by tnal testimony in Clarence Wilson v Johns-Manville sales Corn., et al.. No. G-81 -12S-CA. . 6. E. W Hines, bv tnal testimonv in Charlie Hatlev Newman, et ux \ Ravmark Industnes. Inc., et al.. Civil Action No. M-79124-CA: given in the L.S. Distnct Coun for the Eastern Distnct of Texas. Marshall Div ision. T Dr. H. Corwin Hinshaw. by deposition testimonv in William L. Nicar v. Johns-Manville Sales Corn., et al.. No. W-81-CA-S. S. Dr. H. Corwin Hinshaw. by deposition testimonv in In Re: Related Asbestos Cases. No. C-83-6251-RFP. in the United States Distnct Coun for the Northern Distnct of California: In Re: Related Shipyard and Applicator Cases' Alameda Countv Asbestos Litigation. m the Supenor Coun of the State of California, in and for the Countv of Alameda: Misc. No. 959. In Re: Shipyard and Applicator Cases (Clapper & Braytom Consolidated for Discovery, in the Supenor Coun of the State of California, in and for the Countv of Solano; and In Re: San Francisco Asbestos Complex Litigation, m the Supenor Coun of the State of California, in and for the City and Countv of San Francisco. 9. Dr. H. Corwin Hinshaw. by videotape deposition testimonv in Antonio Mendoza v Fibreboard Corporation, et al.. No. CA2-S00Q. 10. Dr. Jerome Kleinerman. by videotape deposition m Shirlex Tate v Minnesota Mining k Manufactunnc Corporation '3M Com., et al.i in the Distnct Coun of Nueces Countv. Tex a.-,. C|u Judicial Distnct on Max IS. 19S9. - IS - (`Kw. jmcr.'i' \ iL.irrr j! J^nn-l 'jirnCdniv-Lmr dnu Pa dr Ijcmj jr.jiion> oix ] l. Cros.-v-examination ol Dr, VV T.E. McCaughey by vmeo deposition in Selma Ruth Martin \ Owens Coming Fihere!as Corporation, et al.. No. T't -S_-12S-C.A. in the l.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Tyler Division. 12. Dr. Hans Weil!. h> deposition testimony in Ernest Howell \ Armstrong World industries. Inc., ei al.. No. M-80-169-CA. 13. Dr. Thomas M. Wheeler. by videotape deposition testimony in Charles L. Vance v The Dexter Corporation. Cooper Airmotive. Inc., and Aviall. Inc. \ Union Carbide. No. S5-12339-J m the Distnct Court of Dallas County. Texas. 191st Judicial District taken on August 31.19SS. 14. Dr. Thomas M. Wheeler, by videotape deposition testimony in Charles Vance, et al. \. The Dexter Corporation, et al.. Cause No. 85-12339-J in the Distnct Court of Dallas Counts. Texas. 191st Judicial Distnct taken on August 31. 1988. 15. An\ pnor deposition or tnal testimony of any witness called by any other party. either live or by deposition. 16. Any pnor deposition or tnal testimony of any physician who has treated, examined, been consulted regarding the Plaintiff. 17. Any prior deposition or tnal testimony of any Plaintiff represented by Plaintiffs attorney herein. IS. Any deposition or custodian of records concerning the Plaintiff. 19. Any deposition taken by any party in this case. _:o. r v.Vp!"; .tmcT.in \ ;!..in-jj J.-nr i J-'l-Ticjn'.'-Lin-c jno !jT. i bcxnrnainip-.