Document 6Yb7d5rpw7xJVdkywyqJvVJ6
FILE NAME Mundet Cork MCK
DATE 1960 June 22
DOC MCK007
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Meeting Minutes - Technical and Research
Committee - National Insulation Manufacturers Association
TECHNICAL & RESEARCH COMMITTEE MEETING
New York N. Y.
a
June 22 1960
Molded Section
Chairman E. C. Shuman called the meeting to order at 9:30 A.M. with
the following in attendance
oo.
-
a
oe,
E. C. Shuman Chairman L. L. Collogne
Duane Davis
oo
M. E. DeReus
D. Gaches |
H. P. Hoopes
V. L. Miller
W. R. Seipt -
T. J. Walters . D. B. Wingerter
R. C. Parl ett
| Corning Fiberglas Corp. Mundet Cork Corporation |
The Ruberoid Company Union Asbestos & Rubber Company
Manville Sales Corp. . Fibreboard Paper Products Corp.
Pittsburgh Corning Corp.
. . Keasbey & Mattison Company The Ruberoid Company
Manville Corp.
National Insulation Mfrs Assn
and The Section reviewed made the following recommendations after dis-
cussion of the specifications listed
on
study 1-0015091 dated 12/15/59 Insulation Felt Thermal Asbestos Fiber
This pertains
pertains to a woven asbestos blanket made only by Union Asbestos &
Rubber Company so was referred first to Mr. DeReus for his
and
recommendations which will be reviewed later by the Technical & Research
So
a
Committee
oO,
Tolerances Tolerances 1/26/60 dated 00281913 SHIPS Insulation Block Thermal
Par 4 Dimensions & Tolerance Eliminate the table form and the
Thickness - As specified and Material shall be furnished in tbleorcmks |
form in 18 length by 3 width or 36 length by or 12 width Blocks
shall be furnished in thicknesses of ; 1-1 2 2-1 3 3-1 or 4
=
in dimensions are length == 1/8 1/8 width 1/16 thickness
1/16 "
:
Par 4.2 Table II State compressive strength as follows
10 per cent deformation
at not more than
CRMC 000304 000304
2
| Change Density Class 3 to 24 pct
after Change
Mr. Seipt to confirm this after checking
.
Conductivity at 800 F of Class 3 to 0. 78 and Class 0.80 These
values are considered to be more consistant with current production __
2781c dated 2/15/60 Insulation Pipe Covering Thermal - Errors |
apparently typographical require correction Table II Thickness of
_ pipe size by nominal 3-1 thick should be 3-27 32
3-1 "
Pip~ size 14 and larger and nominal " thick
actual thickness
thickness
should be 4-15 actual
_
Table III Type II change density to 26 pcf
of Par 3.4.2 Table I under Diameter tolerances , 1-1 and inch
pipe
sizes
should
be
changed
in the
plus
tolerancteo
3/64
recommended
|
by
one manufacturer
The whole which is
new and not
previously re-
viewedby NIMA members should be studied
and
recommendations Mr. Barnhart as early as possible
i
sent to
Par 4.4 Inspection Mr. Wingerter agreed to study this section and
recommendations to the Committee
make
Far 2. Possible Test Failure - This calls for
density hardness |
and modulous of rupture tests with no designation of the laboratory in which
it must be tested While composition stability thermal k abrasion
and heating loss & shrinkage specified to be made At Government
Whereas 4. states Qualification Tests shall be
laboratory
of conducted by designated by the Bureau
a laboratory Ships but does not state this must be a
Government laboratory - what is intended
523a dated Calcium
5/23/52
Insulation Block Pipe Covering
& Cement Thermal
.
Silicate For temperaturetso 1200F
actual thicknesses
-
Revise Table II showing
Table II
for various nominal thicknesses to conform exactly to
Thickness in 1-2781c including
|
x corrections in typographical
errors on 3-1
" pipe
making
size 3-1 nominal
thickness to read 3-27 for the actual thickness listed and
14 and larger 5 thick to read 4-15 for the actual thicknpeispse sTiazbelse II
in present 523 only goes up to 2-1 nominal thickness but it is
and desirable to have it revised as in 2781c up to
including " thick since
it is NIMA's aim to have all Government
that ultimately
one
single
specifications specification for
read
the
same
so
- Federal will be used byall services
one type of insulation e the |
Par 1.2.1 Thickness Tolerance "
tolerance of plus 1/8 inch or minus 1/16Cihnacnhgien aasctiunal27t8h1iccktnoesrseasdhoA wn
in Table II will be permitted
000305
Par 2. 2 Omit all reference to Commercial Standard CS 131 substitute
All tests shall be made in accordance with ASTM methods as listed in 4.3 __
or / Par 3.2.1 Change to read sections 36 inches long and 6
wide .
:
12 inches
Table Par 3.2.2
I Revise Physical Properties where necessary to
oo
conform to recent NIMA approved revisions in ASTM Spec C 345-54 which
lowered the conductivity oo |
4.3.1 Par 4.3.1 - Density - Change method of test to read in accordance with
ASTM C 303 |
-
Par 4. Thermal Conductivity Change method of test to read in
_ accordance with ASTM 177 or 335 whichever isapplicable
- Par 3,3 Compressive Strength Change ----- be determined in
accordance with ASTM Method 165 for dry strength for compressive strength after emersion Saturate a test specimen conforming to Section 4
of Method C 165 and then test in accordance with Method C 165 Report the wet strength as a percentage of the dry strength
Heating shall shrinkage Par 4.3.6 Change to read
loss and
in accordance with test method ASTM C 356
oe
be determined
Par 4.3.7 - Change to read ----- be determined in accordance with
test method ASTM C166
ee
Cements 00500 dated 5/24/56 Insulating
Thermal Only type I
and V are in the province of this section and where recommended for the
following revisions it being understood that a separate specification will
be written for each type in the future
Type 1 85 Magnesia Thermal Insulating Cement - Revise entirely to
issued conform with newly
ASTM 193-59T in all respects including
Scope Physical
Properties Properties Par 2 will be revised to read
etc. with the exception that Composition
as follows The cement shall be composed
predominately by weight of basic hydrated magnesium carbonate and
combined with asbestos fiber The percentage requirements to be
eliminated as well as the Composition requirement chemical
of under Method of Testing Par 5 ASTM C 193-59T
analysis
II Type Asbestos Thermal Insulating Cement - Revise entirely to conform
in all respects properties wording etc. to
ASTM 194
recently proposed revised
Insulating Type V Diatomaceous Silica Thermal
to conform to recently issued C197-59T
Cement - Revise entirely
Type IV Expanded or Exfoliated Vermiculite Thermal Insulating
$
Cement- Revise entirely to conform with recently issued ASTM C 196
|
59T
2908A
- Insulation- which
3/29/60 Cements
Finishing
Insulation- Type I Asbestos
this Section of could be of interest to
NIMA was reviewed and found
satisfactory Type II is a mineral fiber cement in the province of the
-
Gaches 2886 Plaster Magnesia - Mr.
offered to determine under
. wrehqautisrepdecrievfiisciaotnitohne Navy purchased magnesia cemetonfitnd whether it
|
HH Insulating Block 1-55la 1-55la
& Pipe Covering
Glass ~
ThermalfoCrellular Conductivty Mr. Miller advised this specification is in Washington revision to add the
higher temperature material class e foamed silica The T & R Com-
mittee recommended that the specificatiobne revised eliminating all Tables
recommending various thickness for different temperature conditions as
these are actually in a sense application specifications Also the detailed
description of the Guarded Hot Plate Method of Test for
be eliminated and reference to ASTM Method 177
Conductivity should
to conform to other Federal specification forms -
and 335 used again |
oS
Magnesia 554 Insulation Thermal
Block Pipe & Tubing - Revision
of this specification requested NIMA in letter of July 1 1959 to
G.S.A. was after a follow up letter September 18
W. Thomasson
-
it would be issued as NIMA
acknowledged and stated
recommended It is felt a strong follow up
letter should be sent as Mr. Thomasson has retired and his
do better on the many specifications we are revising if it is psouicncteedssoourt mthaayt
NIMA Committee spends much time and effort in bringing these specifica-
tions up to date and we hope in the future it will not take whole
to
a have them issued
year
when in the mean time any Government purchases
have would
to be made on obsolete specifications
Corps of Engineer Guide Specification Heat Distributing System - CE 301.21
Draft August 12 1959 - Since no reply has been received from the
of Engineers on NIMA letter
Corps
of June 1 in which we outlined in six pages the
CCoommmmiitttteeee'swarsecnoemcmeesnsdaartyions for revision no further action by the
ASTM Dimension Standards - Nesting Pipe
of Block and Pipe
Insulation - This
Sizes and Dimensional Tolerances
subject was discussed at considerable
length preparatory to the next days meeting and conclusions arrived
following day are reported in the Minutes of the combined Session at the
Respectfully submitted
000307 R. C. Parlett Sec Protem