Document 6R35ZLwrnBvyZek9zzoLNeYxR

Q Late 1980s. Page 32 A No, I don't think so. Not -- there wasn't set -- I mean, the question had come up in those -- in that time period, had only come up in a couple or handful of cases that I'd seen. Q Okay. So prior to then, prior to the early -- the late 1980s, would it have been prudent for a manufacturer of asbestos-containing friction products to have warned of the potential dangers? MR. BISHOP: Objection to form. MR. MCGEARY: Beyond the scope of proper report. Ted, can we have the agreement that one objection by one is an objection by all? MR^GIANARIS: Sure. A I think one could make that argument. Q Well, how do you feel about that? MR. BISHOP: Same objection. A It's -- it's difficult -- it's difficult to answer. I mean, one way you can look at it is that at that point in time, in the '80s, asbestos is asbestos is asbestos. And that any asbestos product, no matter what type it was, no matter how well encapsulated it was, should have had a warning on it. And the other way to look at it is, well, that's