Document 6R0XjoMjz8X2Ok9mvb1j8ge89

WAITER'H. HARTUNG, M. O. DIRECTOR OF HEALTH JAMES E. BAUMAN ASSISTANT DIRECTOR SUBJECT: D EPARTMEN T OF H EALTH COLUM BUS November 20, 1935 A D O R E S * A L L OFFICIAL CO R R E SP O N D E N CE S TO THE DIRECTOROF HEALTH OFFICES* : De par t ment s o f s t a t e Buil o imo LABORATORIES: Ohio st a t e Univer sit y Campus Dr. Robert A. Kehoe, Laboratory of Applied Physiology, College of Medicine, ' University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio. Dear Dr. Eehoe: Thank you for your letter of November 18th in regard to the above case. Weighing all of the circumstances, I had concluded to approve it in our records as one of lead poison ing. Outside of the history of possible exposure, etc., this was based upon Dr. Compton's report of supplementary evidence showing an onset v/ith metallic taste, loss of appetite, con : stipation, weakness of extremities, severe pains in abdomen, also an extensive dermatitis of chest and arms - the dermatitis explained as due to sulphuric acid particles acquired from dried, pasty grids from his operation of running a slitting machine. Also objective findings of circunoral pallor, blue line in gums, YJ'.B.C. count 6,800, blood pressure 104/60, pulse rate 58,, temperature 97.6, gripping power of right hand very weak and left hand weak, slight tremor and incoordination, hyperacticn of patellar reflexes, doughy-like masses in abdomen without rigidity of external abdominal muscles, and a slight loss in weight (160 to 155 lbs.), plus a whole gamut of subjeotive symptoms.usually attributed to this form of intoxication. Dr. Compton's diagnosis was acute lead poisoning. The patient had had no previous attacks of lead poisoning, It is true that Dr. Compton reported an absence of stippling, R.B.C. count 5,050,000, hemoglobin 104^, with good condition of teeth and gums, and no evidence of wrist drop, visual, auditory, mental, nutritional, or nephritic phenomena. All of these, of course, night be absent in a given case Of lead poisoning. On the other hand, regarding possible involve ment of the central nervous system, I think I amright in re , calling that a rash and a lowwhite count may occur in meningeal cases, likewise the absence of fever and the presence of a slow pulse ai|d relatively low blood pressure. However, the ustial characteristic findings of meningitis seemto be absent in this ' case. There remains the possibility of some true; cerebral in volvement, as you say, of either (low grade) infection, tumor or otherwise. Ho doubt the opinions of an ophthalmologist: and a neurologist should also be secured. I hope these measures can b carried out. villi be nnich interested in your ultimate conclusions. K 0016588 Dr., Robert A. `lehoe -- Page 2. After some three or fours years of results following our supplementary inquiry form regarding lead poisoning, I hare about come to the conclusion that far too much dependence is be ing placed upon laboratory reports in diagnosis of this condition. In fact, I amalmost convinced that the condition cannot be diag nosed by ordinary laboratory methods (blood and urine). This, of course, does not refer to lead absorption, but to establishing the diagnosis of lead poisoning. I amseeing constantly cases turned dorm for compensation by our Industrial Commission because laboratory evidence of lead poisoning has not been established. You will . appreciate that a large percentage of these cases are seen by physicians after the victim has ceased exposure, and oftentimes lead poisoning is not suspected until the case has become "chronic". Would like to have your views upon this point? With all best regards, Sincerely yours, Chief, Division of Hygiene: Consultant, Occupational Diseases. 61-29 H E 0016589