Document 6BzRaXLMDYONa8LkYqgLkkB44
FILE NAME Kent KNT
DATE 1951 Mar
DOC KNT120
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Journal Article - Cancer of the Lung in Relation
to Tobacco - British Journal of Cancer
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
VOL V
MARCH 1951
NO 1
CANCER OF THE LUNG IN RELATION TO TOBACCO
M. E. DAFF R. DOLL AND E. L. KENNAWAY
From the Pathological Department St. Bartholomew's Hospital and the Statistical Research Unit of the Medical Research Council London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Received for publication February 20 1951
Further Data on the Arsenic Content of Cigarettes
In an earlier paper Daff and Kennaway 1950 data were given for the arsenic content of 5 brands of cigarettes of British and American types of 8 brands of Turkish type and of two others French Rhodesian and also for the amount of arsenic volatilized in smoking A further series of estimations of arsenic in cigarettes from 8 countries U.S.A. Canada Norway Switzerland Austria Italy Bulgaria Poland is reported in Table I. In all 27 brands have been
examined
All quantities of arsenic given in this paper are stated as As g which
is muunerically the same as parts per million
The results given in this and the carlier paper show
1 A high arsenic content 24 to 106 in 10 Turkish brands smoked in
England U.S.A. Canada and Norway
2 A low arsonic content 0.0 to 4-3 in 8 Turkish brands as sold in England
in a Rhodesian brand in a popular Austrian brand and in cigarettes from France
Poland and Bulgaria
3 Intermediate amounts 3-1 to 12-0 in a less popular Austrian brand and
.
in cigarettes from Switzerland and Italy One Canadian brand showed a range
of 8-6 to 18-7
Of course no claim is made that the analyses of these cigarettes which we have happened to obtain through the kindness of various friends can give any complete picture of the comparative habits of smokers in the different countries But most of the brands are popular ones and the results show on the whole a gradation from the arsenic American type type in Western Europe to the arsenicpoor Turkish type in the East with an intermediate European zone which
apcco3rds with Hutson's 1937 account of tobacco culture in Europe quoted below
Cancer of the Lung in Relation to the Types of Tobacco Smoked in Various Countries
Some recent investigations and especially those of Wynder and Graham 1950 and of Doll and Bradford Hill 1950 show an association between the smoking of tobacco and especially of cigarettes and cancer of lung Since arsenic is under
1-20 1-20
2
M. E. DAFF R. DOLL AND E. L. KENNAWAY
TABLE Arsenic Content of Cigarettes Brands other than English
Brand
U.S.A.
cigarettescigaret es
As gper g
Brand C
.
2
. 46.4 46.7
" P.M. . 1
51.0
Canada
Brand K
4 .
" 0
.
5
" W
6
" B.C. . 8
. 36-8 58.2 47-1 55-1 - 8.7 18-4 8-6 18-7 9-1 . 411 46-5 57-9 79.5 67.5 41.7 . 43.5 57.6 42.5
Norway
Brand B " T
.
- 71.7 65-8 74.6
.
4
. 54.4 52.4 55-6 49-7
Switzerland
Brand P
.
4
. 6.4 3.1 3.9 3.4
Italy
Brand N
Austria Brand D " M
Poland Brand Z
Bulgaria
Brand A " R
'
6 10.5 9-8 10-2 13-7 9-1 8-3
.
13
.
12.0
.
13
. Trace 2.1 0.9
.
5
- 2.5 2.1 12 2.7 1.5
:
4
. 0-7 ; 12 12 nil 0-3
.
4 0-6 0-6 nil 0.2
some circumstances carcinogenic in Neubauer 1947 ; Currie 1947 ]
ford Hill and Faning 1948 the question arises whether the arsenic in tol
is concerned in this process Instances of cancer of the lung in workers exp
to arsenic are given by the Chief Inspector of Factories 1939 In a cal
<
arsenical poisoning
. . . due sodium arsenite which was fatal the
mortem examination revealed that in addition to pigmentation of the trunk
limbs warty growths all over the body and perforation of the nasal septum :
was a primary cancer of the right lung with metastatic growths in neighbo
glands and in the liver In a later Report Chief Inspector of Factories -
a 56
another case is recorded
.
.
. in
filling machine operator aged 5
43 years in a factory manufacturing sheep dip containing sodium arsenite
cause of death being due to carcinoma of the right lung Three similar cas
CANCER OF THE LUNG IN RELATION TO TOBACCO
3
notified pulmonary carcinoma occurring in arsenical sheep workers have been
since 1939. Henry 1950 describes a case of cutaneous cancer (
. in
a furnaceman making sodium arsenite who eventually died of cancer of the lung
" Two industrial cases of bronchial cancer are recorded in persons
.
taking arsenic medicinally over long periods Montgomery and Waisman 1941 Semon 1945 This question might be decided if one could have equally reliable statistics for the incidence of cancer of the lung in countries where the pre-
dominant tobacco smoked is of the arsenic or of the arsenic type
We have been collecting data on this question by correspondence but this is a
slow and difficult process In view of the great practical importance of the matter
1) hee NTS
anya it seems better to publish the available data now in the hope of promoting first-
ETT
apy
hand inquiry in appropriate countries
SINT So far as we know the only statistical studies of cancer of the lung in relation
pues
to cigarette smoking which have come from any countries other than Great
Peret
Britain the U.S.A. and Germany are those of Saglam 1944 from Turkey and of
Dungal 1950 from Iceland The data which one would like to obtain from any given country are : A. From national sources Total consumption of tobacco 2 Proportion
of tobacco which is of American or Turkish type 3 Proportion of tobacco smoked as cigarettes cigars and tobacco 4 Population by ages 5 Number of deaths attributed to cancer of the lung The two last items for men
and women separately B. From university clinics for men and women separately by
ages Number of autopsies 2 Number of autopsies showing cancer 3
Number of autopsies showing cancer of lung In the countries where a is not available one must rely on B.
The ratio
of B to B has been suggested as the most reliable index for the present purpose Heady and Kennaway 1949 Figures for a number of separate years are of course very desirable but those for the war period 1940 to 1945 generally show considerable disturbances Fig 2 5 and must be avoided We are
indebted to the staffs of various Embassies in London for data on A 2 3
and 4 in addition to what can be found in such works of reference a<s< the Statesman's Year Book A great deal of information is given in a report The
Consumption and Production of Tobacco in Europe by J. B. Hutson 1937
In such comparisons between different countries at least four possible carcino-
genic factors must be considered namely : 1 Smoking of tobacco 2 Smoking
of tobacco containing arsenic 3 Inhalation of the dust of towns and of coal
smoke 4 Inhalation of products of the internal combustion engine
od
Thus populations in eastern Europe which are subject to the first of these
ae
factors and only slightly if at all to the second will also be comparatively free
from the third and fourth while the industrial peoples of Britain and the U.S.A.
will be most exposed to the second third and fourth together and the inhabitants
of Iceland will be subject to the second only
Tobacco Culture in Europe Hutson 1937 classifies the types of tobacco grown in Europe thus :
1 Oriental Turkey Greece Bulgaria S. Yugoslavia U.S.S.R. 2 Oriental S.E. Italy S.W. Yugoslavia Rumania Hungary S. Czechoslovakia S. Poland
4
M. E. DAFF R. DOLL AND E. L. KENNAWAY
3 Dark cured Hungary Rumania Czechoslovakia Germany N. Italy France Spain Belgium Sweden Switzerland
He divides the countries of Europe into 4 groups : .
1 Those in which a portion of the factory consumption is grown Germany Spain Belgium Poland Czechoslovakia Switzerland
2 Those in which production is approximately equal to consumption Italy Yugoslavia Rumania
3 Those which produce a surplus Greece Turkey Bulgaria Hungary 4 Those in which little or no tobacco is grown which are all those not named
above
The countries in the third group are of most interest if one can assume that the tobacco smoked there is at any rate very largely of the arsenic type but unfortunately the conditions for the study of cancer of the lung in the whole population are not as yet very favourable in them and this subject like that of cancer of the liver presents peculiar difficulties on account of the danger of confusion of primary and secondary growths
Tobacco Consumption and Cancer of the Lung in Various Countries Turkey
1 Data on the consumption of tobacco in Turkey are given in Table II
TABLE Consumption of Tobacco in Turkey
Year
Tobacco consumption million lb.
1925
15.8
.
Population 13,023,000
Tobacco consumption
lb. per head
.
1.21
1930
21.9
.
14,591,000
.
1.50
1935
25.0
.
16,158,018
.
1.55
1937
28.2+
.
16,800,000
.
1.68
1942
37.2+ 37.2+
.
17,820,950
:
2.09
1947
40.77
.
18.870,785
.
2-16
1949
39.77
.
20,900,009
.
* Figures from Hutson 1937
Figures provided by the Turkish Embassy
++ The Times October 30 1950
1.90
2 Prof. Schwartz of the University of Istanbul writes that in Turkey tobacco is consumed almost wholly in the form of cigarettes that cigars European pipes and the oriental water are almost unknown among the bulk of the people and that there are many heavy smokers among women
3 The only publication from any Balkan country upon cancer of the lung in relation to smoking appears to be that of Prof. Saglam 1944 of the University of Istanbul who gives the following details which are quoted in full in view of the
importance of his original paper and the difficulty of access to it
The clinical statistics of pulmonary carcinoma in Turkey :
The Int Clinic of Gulhane Suleyman Numan The Int Clinic of Culhane Tevfik Saglam . The Sect for Int Diseases of Gureba Tevfik
Year .
1899-1908 1923-1926
Number of
patients
.
4270
.
2343
.
Pulmonary
tumour
2 +
7
Rate per thousand
46 47 2.1 3.0
Saglam
:
:
.
.
.
.
1931-32
.
1459
9
7:4 6.2
Haydarpaxa Numune Hast Tevfik Saglam . 1936-1939 . 4230 .
24
- 5.6 5
* Recalculated from the figures given by Prof. Saglam in the two adjacent columns
CANCER OF THE LUNG IN RELATION TO TOBACCO
The pathologic statistics :
Year .
Number of Pulmonary autopsies cancer
Gullane Reinhard
. . . 1899-1908 . 800 .
3
.
Gullane Lufti -
.
:
.
:
.
1923-1926
.
502
5
:
Haydarpasa Numune Hast .
.
:
.
1936-1939
.
635
.
14
:
The pathologic Institute of the Uni-
versity of Istanbul Prof. Ph Schwartz 1935-1943 5126
79
.
Rate per thousand
3.7 10 22
15.4
< Taking the clinical statistics into consideration it is clear that within 30-40
years the increase in our clinics is 12 times and according to the anatomo
logic statistics it is 4-1 times as much
<<
We have seen
11
cases of pulmonary carcinoma in the newly inaugurated
3. Ic Hastaliklari Klinigi in 23 months among 2084 patients 5-3 in a thousand
" All these statistics show that in our country within the last 30 years pul-
monary carcinoma has increased in a great proportion
seno Saglam rejects cigarette as a carcinoma Some authors believe that smoking tobacco and inhaling the smoke
factor in the incidence of bronchial
there exists a relationship between and pulmonary carcinoma Animal
experiments seem to support this point of view Some authors are of the opinion
that especially cigarettes play a great part in its production We do not hold
the same view For a long time at least since 50 years almost only cigarettes
are smoked in our country In spite of this the increase in pulmonary Ca. in this country has gone on the same pace as in those countries where cigars and pipes are mostly smoked The amount of tobacco consumed in our country has
shown a constant increase and from 9,370,000 kgr in 1926 has risen to 16,680,000
kgr in 1942. But this rise is not sufficient to explain the increase in pulmonary
Ca.
But there is no exact basis for any such argument We do not yet know what consumption of any tobacco produces any given incidence of bronchial carcinoma
nor do we know the relations of any such effect
4 We are indebted to Prof. Saglam Prof. Schwartz and Dr. Yenermen for a full protocols of the 193 autopsies on cases of primary tumour of the lung carried out at the University of Istanbul during 1934-1950 and b figures for the total autopsies and autopsies on cases of cancer by sexes for the same period
Table III To make the material comparable with other series we have omitted the
TABLE III Cases of Cancer of the Lung Among Autopsies Carried Out at the University of Istanbul 1935 1950
Number of autopsies
Poriod
All cases
1935-9 ,
1940-4 1945-9 .
1949 5. 0
Male
1833 2585 2612
767
Female
947 747 1323 488
Total
2780
C.
3332
3935
.
1255
.
All cancor
Male 217 302 359 104
Female
97 70 129 53
Total
314
.
372
488
:
157
.
Cancer of lung
Mulo
33 48 73 31
Female 5 7
10 4
Total
38 55 83 35
Changes in incidence will be seen more clearly in Table IX where cases of cancer of the lung are
shown as percentages of all autopsies and of all cancers twice
Note that data for the year 1949 appear
6 M. E. DAFF R. DOLL AND E. L. KENNAWAY
data for 1934 and have removed 3 cases all in men described
from the total of
as benign tumours
and
primary lung tumours a chondroma in 1935 another in 1939
a polyp in 1937 We have however retained four cases described histo-
logically as not being carcinoma namely lymphogranuloma in a man one case
each in 1936 and 1937 sarcoma in a man 1941 cylindroma in a woman 1942
Bulgaria and Greece
Hutson 1937 states that the surplus produced in Bulgaria and Greece with
that from Turkey and Hungary makes up the bulk of the world's
of
oriental cigarette tobacco
supply
It is difficult to estimate the amount consumed
locally as an unknown amount is grown for personal use and escapes tax The
official figures for tobacco
man's Year
consumption
Hutson
1937 and for population
.
States-
Book 1931 indicate an annual consumption of about 1-7 lb.
head
in
Greece and of 1.9 lb. per head in Bulgaria in the period
1925 to
per 1930.
The
figures are similar to those obtained for Turkey in 1937 1-68 lb. per head Table
II
We have no data on the incidence of cancer of the lung in these countries
Yugoslavia
We do not know the amount of tobacco consumed in Yugoslavia
Kosir of Ljubljana has provided us with information about Yugoslavia but Dr.
of the population He writes that the kinds of
the smoking habits
66
are : a type Makedonija cigarettes ;
tobacco smoked in Yugoslavia b type
c type Vojcodina pipe and cigars
Hercegovina cigarettes and
Makedonija Ljubljana There are smoked principally cigarettes These are of the oriental
i.e. they have a natural bouquet which gives the tobacco
type
- + Only in the western
of
type
part
Yugoslavia there are smoked cigars
laansdt w pa ir pethe Use of tobacco for snuffing is quite insignificant . " Before the
only import was some Dutch tobacco for cigars ; during the war some
Bulgarian and after it some American tobacco through U.N.R.R.A. was
imported but all these amounts were very small
We are also indebted to Dr. Kosir and to Prof. F. Hribar for
the numbers of autopsies and of those on all
a statement of
cases of malignant disease and of
cancer of the lung by sex carried out at the Clinical Hospital
Slovenia during 1925 to 1949. These data are shown in Table IV
.
Table Cases of Cancer of the Lung Among Autopsies Carried Out at the Clinical Hospital Ljubljana 1925 to 1949
Poriod
1925-9 1930-4 . 1935-9 . 1940-4 1945-9 , 1948-9 ,
All cases
Malo Feinale Total
564 793 1063 1080 1929 897
553 765 868 1050 1589 791
1117 . 1558 1931 . 2130 : 3518 . 1688
Number of autopsies
All cancer
Male Female Total
72 117 132 129 246 141
65 91 113 135 292 154
137 . 208 : 246 264 . 538 . 295 .
See footnote to Table III
Cancer of lung
Male
8 5 11 18 28 19
Fomale
2 I 1 1 9 ?
Total
10 6
12 19 38 26
CANCER OF THE LUNG IN RELATION TO TOBACCO
Switzerland 1 We are indebted to the Bureau F^'d^'ralde Statistique for information
about the amount of tobacco consumed over the period 1936 to 1949 and to the Direction G^'n^'raldes Douanes for information about the sources of imported tobacco The data are summarized in Table V and Fig 1
TABLE
Consumption and Sources of
Tobacco in Switzerland Percentage of tobacco
1936 to 1949
YeYar ear
Tobacco consumption lb. per head
1936
1937
1940
1943
1945
1947
1949
3.5 4.0 4.6 4.9 5.9 5.7 4.5
grown
Imported from
a .
Balkans U.S.A.
Other areas
6
. 10 . 38 . 46
12
Lee
tes
12
,
es
tee
18
.
+e
.
.
.
--
20
,
ees
te
ke
19 18
ii
ii .
:
Lees
42
:
28
* Mainly Brazil and the East Indies
We have no detailed information about the manner in which the tobacco is
smoked but until World War II cigarettes formed only a small proportion of the
whole Table X
2 Prof. H. v Meyenberg has provided a summary of the autopsies performed at the Pathological Institute Z^...richduring the period 1927 to 1941. Among 20,681 autopsies there were 3584 cases of cancer and 276 cases of cancer of the lung These figures are compared with those from other countries in Table IX
3 It is however not necessary to be dependent on hospital statistics for an estimate of the incidence of cancer of the lung in Switzerland as vital statistics
are available for the whole country We are indebted to the Bureau F^'d^'radle Statistique Berne for a statement showing the deaths attributed to cancer of the bronchi and lungs by sex for each year 1929 to 1949 Fig ) and also for
data on age distribution of the population The crude death rates shown in Table X in comparison with the rates from England and Wales and from Norway have been calculated from population statistics provided by Stocks personal
communication
Norway
1 Prof. Leiv Kreyberg of the University of Oslo has supplied figures for the production of tobacco pipe cigars and cigarettes for each year 1930 to 1947
Fig 2 and for selected years in Table VI "
Mr. O. Jakobsen of the Norwegian Embassy writes that Norway normally
imports 85 per cent of her tobacco from America Virginian tobacco 9 per cent from the Middle East Turkish tobacco and 6 per cent from elsewhere The imports are practically equal to the consumption as the only exports are to the mercantile marine Tobacco except cigars is almost all imported as such and not as cigarettes Many persons buy the cheaper pipe tobacco and make their own cigarettes obtaining thus nearly twice as many for a given sum ; hence the
M. E. DAFF R. DOLL AND E. L. KENNAWAY
500
, 500
Males
400
300
|
200-
100
Tobacco
e.
Females
1929 1931 1933 1935 1937 1939 1941 1943 1945 1947 1949
Fio Cancer of lung
Deaths 1929-1949 Consumption of tobacco ( hundred thousand pounds
1936-1949 Switzerland
official figures for the consumption of pipe tobacco and cigarettes cigaretes are misleading
smoking is most common in rural areas
TABLE Consumption of Various Types of Tobacco in Norway Kreyberg
1931 to 1947
Year .
1931 1932 1936 1937 1940 1943 1946 1947
Tobacco consumption lb. per head
1.4
1.4 :
:
1.7
.
:
1.9
.
.
2.2
:
1.0 -
2-6
2.9 -
Percentage of tobacco in form of:
Cigars
2 3 3 3 3 1 I 1
Cigarettes
.
36
.
35 . :
36 .
39 .
39 : -
49 :
41 :
44 :
Pipe tobacco
62 62 61 58 58 49 58 55
2 Prof. Leiv Kreyberg has supplied figures for the deaths attributed to cancer of the lung by sex for the years years 1930 to 1948 Fig 2 3 for deaths sepa-
CANCER OF THE LUNG IN RELATION TO TOBACCO 9
in urban and rural areas and for the population by sex The calculated
rately
from cancer of the lung are shown in Table X.
Jakobsen
death rates
according to Mr. Jakobsen
The national figures are reasonably reliable as his last illness is required to
<
The
doctor
who
has
treated
the
deceased
during
which must be
fill in an official certificate stating the cause of death . . .
stated
in
medical
terms
as
precisely
precisely
as
possible
and
it
is
not
permitted
to
use
such as " disease of the heart or " disease of the lungs general diagnoses
The
160-
Deaths
Cancer
Cancer of lung
/ 120- 120-
80F
* e
@.
sv
/
401- ow!/
o/ m
/
^'
-e-9-9-0-0 8"
Tobacco
Tobacco
y
' :
2-8,
,
:
y
LA
i
e.
@
oy
Ne:
1934 1930 1932 1934 1936 1935 1940 1942 1944
1948
1946 1948
FIG Cancer of lung
Deaths Consumption_of_tobacco Consumption_of_tobaco Consumption_of_tobacco hundred metric tons Norway 1930-1947 Kroyberg
statement must be in accordance with an official nomenclature of causes of death
The doctor is required to examine the patient after death 3 Twenty per cent of the population were estimated to live in the citics of Norway in both 1930 and 1946 ; the proportion living in urban areas can therefore be considered to have been constant throughout the period under review The following are the estimated crude death rates for each sex in urban
and rural areas
Norway
Death
Rates
of Cancer of Lung per million
Death rates of cancer of lung per million
Urban
Rural
1930-38
1939-47
Male
Female Persons
24
:
19
.
21
.
63
:
42
:
52
'
Male
14 30
Female . 12
24
Persona
13 27
30 M. E. DAFF R. DOLL AND E. L. KENNAWAY
The data show that
a The incidence is greater in urban areas b The urban excess is slightly greater for men than for women-
1930-38 1939-47
urban : rural
"
ratio male 1-7 ; female 1.6 1 + male 2.1 1 female 8 1
c The increase between 1930 and 1947 has been greater in the towns than in
the country and greater for men than for women
Urban increase male 2.6 1 ; female 2 1
Rural
"
male 2.1 ; female 2-0 1
[
Males
ato ti tite ety dy 1930 1932 1934 1936 1935 1940 1942 1944 1946 1948
FIG 3. Cancer of lung Deaths Norway 1930-1947 Kreyberg Kreyberg
Sweden
Snuff used for chewing and for insufflation makesmakes up a very large but diminish-
ing proportion of all the tobacco products consumed Hutson 1937 Prof.
Berven personal communication Table VII Prof. Berven
" Elis
fine powder like the English snuff and is inhaled in
writes Snuff is a
very the nose
For chewing there are two
small quantities through
pinches i.e. about
types a The same type of snuff 3 b4ig
the lip
and
the
one teaspoonful
mandible
taken
from
the
snuff
is
put
in
between
and is chewed backwards and forwards until it becomes
a tough mass in size of about a hazel which is lying at the same place about
hours . . . b Chewing tobacco is to be had in the form of braids
CANCER OF THE LUNG IN RELATION TO TOBACCO
11
Table Distribution of Different Kinds of Tobacco as Per Cent of the Total Consumption Sweden Berven personal communication
Year
Cigars and cigar Cigarettes
Tobacco for
Tobacco for
Snuff
Tobacco
Consumption
lb. per head headhead per year
7
rettes
smoking chewing
Snuff
Tobacco .
%
%
%
%
%
%
.
1908 .
10.8
3.3
4.4
:
1921
10.1
8.3
11.1
*
1931
9.3
16.1
13.0
.
1936
8.5
22.3
15.5
e
1944
6.7
27.9
23.7
t
1948
5.1
44.9
16.3
:
1949
4.7
46.9
15.6
7.9 3.6 1.8 1.2 0.6 0.4 0.4
73.6 66.9 59.8 52.5 41 33.3 32.4
26.4 33.1 40.2 47.5 58.9 66.7 07.6
2.08 2.23 1.73 1.55 1.15 1.06 1.02
0.7 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.7 2.1 2.1
from which they bite 1 to cm This piece is chewed to a firm consistence which is then lying at the same place as the snuff Unfortunately no figures for the incidence of cancer of the lung are available
Iceland
consumption particularly Smoking habits in Iceland are discussed by Dungal 1950 according to whom
The
of tobacco
inin the form of cigarettes has certainly
been much less in Iceland than in most European countries and America
Dungal's figures for cigarette consumption and for the incidence of lung car-
cinoma are summarized in Table IX
Britain
Data with regard to tobacco consumption and the incidence of cancer of the lungin Britain have been presented previously Kennaway and Kennaway 1947 ; Fig 4 5 New data on the autopsy incidence of cancer of the lungin British hospitals have been collected Table VIII
TABLE VIII --Cases of Cancer of the Lung Among Autopsies Performed at Three British Hospitals 1925-48
Hospital
Period
Glasgow Western . Infirmary Cappell
St. Mary's London . Newcomb
1925-9 .
1930-4
1935-9
1940-4
1945-8 .
1947-8
1930-4
1935
9 .
All cases
M.
F. Total
Numberof autopsies
All cancers
Cancer of the lung
..
F. Total
M. F. Total
oe ae oe . . an
827 746
-. -. - . -
481 442
1154
.
133
1214
.
153
1395
.
190
1273
180
1324
.
220
687
103
1308
.
140
1188
.
171
83 82 124 124 133 68 86F2 112
216 235 314 304 353 171 77217 283
.
287886 12
#
.
287886
606554al
6762204
.
287886
6065 4al
6762204
.
287886 606554al
6762204
.
287886 606554al
6762204
287886
.
287886
6065 4al
6762204
.
287886
606554al
6762204
1945-8
683 428 HIIl
.
139
2987 229
.
1947-8 .
371 229
600
83
2987 130
1
St. Bartholomew's . 1930-4 . 1056 558 1614 .
206
2987 301
.
London
1935-9 .
987 528 1515
.
192 121 313
.
Cunningham
1940-4 1945-8 1947-8
544
301
ve
217 125
es
.
761
426
:
ae
111
82 171
2.
60
82
87
.
* See also Table IX
7255
88ax
3885
7255
3885
7255 88ax
3885
7255 88ax
3885
:
73 39
73
A8
39
12
M. E. DAFF R. DOLL AND E. L. KENNAWAY
10000-
Males
8000
6000-
4000-
ToTobbacco acco
_
Tobacco
Po ced
.
:
:
2000-
ee
Females
Pa en
1948 Hi 1924 1926 1928 1930 1932 1934 1936 1938 1940 1942 1944 1946 1948 1950
FIG Cancer of lung Deaths England and Wales Consumption of tobacco hundred
:
F
thousand pounds United Kingdom 1924 1949
g} l
-
*
t
x
5
\
e.
ey
, o-? /
- ~N
a
*
\ a fv
Nf
Ne
a
-
_ Nee
ee
x
/
x
2H
aN
RI
\
25 27 29 30 35 32
i
38 ji
1 it
s
1924 25 26 27 28 29 30 32 34 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49
a
FIG 5.Consumption of tobacco lb. per head United Kingdom Switzerland and Norway
ie
o
.@... Un.i@ted Kingdom
@---@---0 Switzerland
XX XX ^ Norway
CANCER OF THE LUNG IN RELATION TO TOBACCO
Incidence of Lung Cancer Comparison of the data from various countries
In Table IX hospital data from five sources in Britain and from Turkey Switzerland and Iceland are presented together The cases of lung
Ycaungcoesrlaavrie ashown as percentages of the number of autopsies and of the number of malignant growths found at autopsy ; sexes are shown separately whenever the data are available For comparison estimations of the annual consumption
of tobacco are included
The data show that :
a 1 A high proportion of autopsies on cases of cancer between fifth and a
third are now found to show cancer of the lung in British hospitals ; 20 years
ago the figure was between 10 and 15 per cent
is
unlike
2 The experience concerning males in Istanbul in recent years not
the 3 BriTtihseh eexxppeerriieennccee in Slovenia is comparable with British experience in the
first quarter of this century 4 The lowest recorded figures are found in Iceland
5 Swiss figures are comparable with Slovene ones however indicate a higher incidence Table X and too
Swiss national statistics
much significance should
not be attached to one hospital series Table X shows the crude death rates from cancer of the lung in England and
Wales Switzerland and Norway for selected years between 1931 and 1947 and estimates of the annual rates of consumption of tobacco
A comparison of the distribution in the three countries is given below Mr. Olaf Jakobsen has kindly supplied figures for Norway by sexes for 1930 and
1946 the figures for the latter year are summarized in the table The data for Switzerland were supplied by the Bureau F^'d^'radle Statistique Berne
All 20-3040 50 60 70-
Males
England and
Wules 1947 48.4 7.4
7.8 7.1 5.3 4.0 2-6
Norway
1946
49.3 8.6 7.9 6.6 5.0 3.3 2.7
Population
Per cent of all ages
Females
Females
Switzerland
1950
48.3 7.4 7.2 7.1 5.3 3.7 2.4
. All . 20-
3040-50. 60
_
. 70-
England and Wales 1947
51.6
7.5
7.9 7.5 6.3 5.0
3.8
Norway
1946
50.7 8-3 7.9 7.0 5.4 3.9 3.5
Switzerland
1950 51.7
7.5 7.3 7.7 - 6.2 4.5 3.4
; Males of the important group 50 to 69 make up a rather larger percentage
of the population in England and Wales 9-3 than in Norway 8.3 while the position of Switzerland is interinediate 9-0 these small differences cannot account for the differences in the death and justify the use of crude death
~
rates]
ri =
3
4 y fyon PI 5Hewl 4a A : .4 refa&zxaa>
juawfig uondmsuc )TSt-1L6Z0-06180-9061 ec-zerTE-621Oe-EG Le-oReT LE-OFET )er SP-LP6T (9-0(1-0(6-0(ra(3 (6-3 {ep
(1-6
I
)
oe (peoy 818) 8935) 8989) jes oot )
)
jenury ur
6-1 0-3 6-8
aod
a 6-8 OO om - . - - . se -
i a
-
0-0OeI ( - $F -
(8130) LT 13 BS
8
)
61
a)
isdomny osanqay LEGT ZbGLTPOT
OS6t eT6t ee1)
6E6T
J
-
*
'
*
.
*
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
*
*
*
.
,
'
'
*
be:
.
.
*
yw
LZ
Lung cent as Per cent
Diagnosed
at
Different
on cent of All All Autopsies Autopsies Autopsies Autopsies and and of All All Cancer CaCannccererDiagnosed Diagnosed Diagnosed Diagnosed atAutopsyAutopsy Autopsy Diferent Diferent 8-2 88 22 8-8
.Cancer Countries?
JO Countries _
aguea OpRUIE qed
a
-
G+ $1
1-9
9g
autopsies
Cancer
Cancer
Cancer
. the lung lung
ee per
cent of : cancer
rs td 6-0 L-0 tobaco
Anual
consumption od 8-F GL oP
Locality Locality Jed [Ty 1894-198 1894-198
hospitals 1894-198 hospitals *
a Male Male Female Female Female . 0.96 1.6 0.96 1.6 Li3 os Male
0.961.6 26 Femalo Femalo 190 02 fer: and Holmes
1924-1928
1924-1928
:
* .
*
2.11
2.11
0
.
oe
Femalo Persons Persons . OFT 19002 cgts ) Lip 86s
.
.
*
1911 13
(
a *
7
General 943 Infirmary Infirmay 189-132 PCIOGWLZU Capel
8 <-
189-132 1-18-90 12--78 193-1937 193-1937 1f-% 6% o-1^'eF rg Le 2.31 2.31 FP g-F Te oe 16.5 14.5 14.5 1% 11.32 11.32 11.32 6-0 Vt 1934 36 (
2-7 8-F 8-9
8:3 Gi
OF
amie
GlasgowCap el sordgnetcad1935-39 1940-4 1940-4 a - _ - - 7 OT 4.4 oe 6-1 -%6-1 2.8 22.8 12.9 12.9 12.9 18.818.81-0 1-0 9-0 a
* 2 . 9-3 Z- 8-0 6-0 Layar
yy
[Ty 1945-48
LondonMary's
Newcomb
Bartholmew's Bartholomew's
1935-39 1935-39 a
* 4.8 4.8 a a 2.0 -
..
21.1
1935-39 98 3.8 69 oS Le 21.1 13.7 8.0 8.0 18.9 18.9 OT LT GT BO bP 1S "
"
~
*
"
*
*
*
*
-
8
7
27.7
27.7
.
13.7 * 23.3 23.3 * * "
8
*
*
*
Saglam BE-OS* 1940-41940-41940-4 S86I-Y8T3.7 Cuningham Cuningham
Cuningham *poneg
1935-39
3.7 P8-086T 68-HS6T 4.6 4.6 PROk6T 7.0 7.0 &P-EFG1
GR 19.3
Se6T 38.7 38.7
16.7GE 16.7 16.7
31.0 31.0 31.0 BR-OFET 6p-SPET
1-Le6r
Sb-S6T
$P-LPGI SBLFET SP-LESI
oc-eRET
6P-8FET
BET *
1937
*
*
Schwartz
1945-49 yAremiygu 2.8
* 17.0
s,
Ljublan MOUL[TIABE 1.1 xX]
Kosir 1925-291930-34 Jersue1y .00.61.0
wopuoc7
0.s 6
arepseg) uvqity)
0.7
* *
*
,
:
1947
S
(Aanquefyg)
*{eBumq)
Adeuay
yeqidsoy
6
M@UIOj
T
. *
.
1936 m1ADISOHRX Meynburg
1945-49 1945-49 UIDRNLG1927-41
spec] 1.5
dre1.1
4g
uOpuoy
Ay
1 -8paquesy
p1anpsohvnu. ltqnl]
1936 3.5Haclydoy UDNAATuszoyyseAargeqey g9g KENAWYKENAWY suliqnt{y
x
YearYearCancer Cancer Cancer the . Annual Cancer the Annual
(0 57 (0 3-2 egts egts 2
*** Persons 14293 FL100100 )OL 3.8("2.8 JSeT7.49642
Am.40 1940 162 gp 321222 115 AT
~
366
*
131
*
*
ST orf 206 5.4 cgts cgts 4
2189 398 39822189
106
17 Jo
183 *
6
USh
a OF 0% 0% SI FS 98 OF
the
figures United
habits
Thesmoking difernt TUNG Ireland cent
habits population population
diference diference diference Northern
importanceimportance importance poulation this S29 _
PUNLOZ ( LP6T AL
war
-
no
*
40
ur
(FE
{-2 Ul fo
eauryau0eqoy and (SP6T){Sets prey
t;oE OF 6E61 oF 6F 6-England England and Gg Od
43.0501 Scotland
avil*a(pbvolyse-g) WalesWalesWales 8739)
Northern
Ireland
Kingdom
opr
.
punpbury "uondmsuon KingdomKingdom uorTIur qonuef) United
pusfazqiMg ue dUN] SURsuie "oF "OF &g gg Tk 9F6or 90L Kingdom ys
bueary ovaDngo,s
ayy Ynin
{0
sa0ung pasoduoy
wot +
saypar aSayfe
pues
YOO
oY} Jed
JO
se7ea
ft+4 LT 61 1% 61
Jaonezy . A 89 $8 Tw YdeGY 9
te ee 98 PE
aead LLT Sst ae * "
(9-B's80) AaBqo4yyeuny *(peoy/ )op roe (egHE(8S(8
(ee
twato) * rs4
a ge Veebee
pe
op:+
-
*
>
>
Sunyuoru SHOSIsOarTeya fe ag Tg gor ter ergtag gz
TY purSugy eyy Jed ys Jo a lg 6 eP ap
$s 69 14 L
. seqez
Touey xone Sg 86 Gel I9T
mrs, yecT *
'
ZS Wes 998 86E
|
ULOpZui A104
yy you
eourysdupay cau
142)
PUBEITOY} ou
04 jo
st
ODAeBzqOa}rpMeuysIONGouslyip
ucendapoqangsy orqutiean JOT sryy
pUE}OgUI "ana
eqnea Aq
somaysytqey ayy je
ory, Furpoursques gout
.
SejeA,
pues PURJaAyT wopSuny
puvlsugypurejqoagWlsy_ION peyruy
*
J f
-
TOs oTS61 GEGT (OS6T L^'6T OPGI Spel 9FGEI (LEGIT oyy aed
16
;
M. E. DAFF R. DOLL AND E. L. KENNAWAY
The data show that
1 The apparent incidence of cancer of the lung is increasing in both sexes in
all three countries
2 The rate of increase in the 10 years 1936-7 to 1946-7 has been much the
:
same in the three countries ; in the five years 1931-2 to 1936-7 it was more rapid
=
in Norway than in England and Wales and was slowest in Switzerland
'
1931-2 .
1936 7 .
1936-7 . 1946-7 .
Death Rate from Cancer of the Lung
England and Wales
M. 100
170
F. 100 137
Persons 100 162
1936-7 as porcentage of 1931 2
-
Switzerland
M.
F. Persons
.
100
100
100
.
. 141 111 132 :
M. 100 177
100 252
100 173
1946-7 as porcontage of 1936
7
100
100
100
100
:
227
.
200
175
196
:
100 215
NorwayNorway
F. Persons
100 211
100 187
100 190
100 202
3 The rate of increase has been greater for males than for females in England
and Wales and in Switzerland
4 The incidence is comparatively low in Norway In 1947 the crude death rate was approximately the same as it had been in England and Wales and in Switzerland 16 years previously
Population both sexes producing one from cancer of the Jung
~
1931
1947
death
Norway
. .. .. .
Switzerland . . . .
.
.
England and Wales
.
.
.
.
83,300
.
24,400
.
17,500
.
20,800
9,400
4,400
5 The difference is essentially a difference of incidence in men The inci-
dence in women is similar in Norway and Switzerland and about twice as great
in England and Wales Table X
The incidence of cancer of the lung is much more nearly nearly equal in the two sexes in Norway than it is in the other countries which have been studied
Death rate from cancer of the lung in women as percentage of the
death rate in men 1947
: Norway
.
.
.
.
71
England and Wales
.
.
%
4
Switzerland . . . .
19
Z
The ratios of cancer of the lung in women to total autopsies in women also 2 indicates a relatively low incidence in women in Turkey and Yugoslavia Table IX
CANCER OF THE LUNG IN RELATION TO TOBACCO
17
The relation between increases in the consumption of tobacco and in cancer of the lung
One should perhaps refer again though there may be no need to do so to the absence of any necessary connection between two quantities which are varying in the same way ; thus wireless licences in this country have multiplied at a rate very similar to that shown by cancer of the lung Kennaway and Kennaway 1947
In Tables XI and XII comparisons are attempted of data from this country Norway and Switzerland during three periods 1931-2 1936 a7nd 1946-7
TABLE Comparison between Tobacco Consumption Cigarette Consumption and Death Rate Persons from Cancer of the Lung at Different Periods
Country
1946
Tobacco
consumption lb. per head
Cigarette consumption lb. per head
a7s percentage of 1936 7
England and Wales
.
128
.
145
Switzerland
.
.
.
155 .
170
Norway
.
.
.
153
.
185
Death rate from cancer
of the lung
227 196 202
England and Wales
Norway
.
1936-7 as porcentage of 1931
2
-
.
.
120
.
123
. . 129 . 130
* 1949 as percentage of 1939
X
162 187
In all three countries the increase in cancer of the lung was greater than the increase in tobacco consumption between 1931-2 and 1936-7 and between 1936-7 and 1946-7 The increase in consumption of cigarettes was more like the increase in lung cancer over the later period but there was a considerable gap between the figures in England and Wales
TABLE XII Comparison between Tobacco Consumption Cigarette Consumption and Death Rate Persons from Cancer of the Lung in England and Wales and Norway and in England and Wales and Switzerland
Period
Tobucco consumption lb. por head
Cigarette consumption lb. per head
Death rate from cancer
of the lung
England and Wales as percentage of Norway .
1946-7 : : . . 180 . 350
499
1936-7
.
.
.
.
190
.
446
444
1931-2
.
.
.
.
232
470
513
England and Wales as percentage of Switzerland
1946-7 . . . . 085 : 162
205
1949
1936-7
.
:
:
.
104
.
266
1939
The difference in death rates between England and Wales and Norway was
also very much greater than the difference in tobacco consumption; it was
2
18 18
M. E. DAFF R. DOLL AND E. L. KENNAWAY
however reasonably close to the difference in cigarette consumption In Switzerland tobacco consumption was much the same as in England and Wales but death rates were only half as high Differences in cigarette consumption again agree
with the differences in death rates better than do differences in total tobacco con-
sumption This is because a much smaller proportion of the tobacco is consumed in the form of cigarettes in Switzerland than in England
Clearly no exact proportionality has been found in the data so far available between the amount of tobacco smoked and the prevalence of cancer of the lung in different countries and at different periods Cancer of the lung appears to increase more rapidly than does the use of tobacco ; such a change in effect may occur at a certain level in the dosage of a drug A complicating factor is that when the population of a country consumes more tobacco one does not know how
much of this is due to the initiation of new smokers and how much to the increased
use of tobacco by those who smoke already
DISCUSSION
1 The high proportion of cancer of the lung found among autopsies on cases of malignant disease in males in Istanbul suffices to show that the arsenic content
of tobacco has not provided any simple and exclusive explanation of the association between cigarette smoking and this form of cancer It is perhaps too soon to say that arsenic is quite unobjectionable in tobacco for we have no
information about the minimum effective dose of any carcinogen in man nor about the possible summation of effect of different carcinogens
As yet we have autopsy figures only from a single centre in Turkey and of course more data from this and other sources in Greece and Bulgaria for instance are very desirable The figures from a single hospital in Yugoslavia suggest an incidence of cancer of the lung comparable to the British figures of 30 years ago We have no figures for the incidence of cancer of the lung upon the whole population of any East European country The official figures for the consumption of grown tobacco are liable to the error that a portion may escape record
2 We do not know whether tobacco smoke itself contains some carcinogen or whether the practice of smoking renders the respiratory tract more susceptible to agents from external e.g. the benzpyrene of smoke or internal sources If the carcinogen is in the tobacco smoke and is in particulate form we facilitate its penetration to the bronchi by inhalation through the mouth thus evading the nasal filter The evidence available at the moment is against the direct carcinogenic importance of tobacco sinoke because it tends to exclude the two most
obvious carcinogens arsenic and benzpyrene which one might expect to be present But the range of chemical structure of known carcinogens is now so wide that one must consider other possibilitics
3 All the older data about cancer of the lung must be reviewed in the light of this connection with smoking ; one must reconsider the inverse relationship with sunlight Stocks 1947 and the very low incidence upon a rather curious assortment of occupations namely agriculture mining and spinning Kennaway and Kennaway 1947 The miner who works ground cannot smoke during third of the day and the spinner and those in
many other occupations cannot smoke while at work
4 The incidence of cancer of the lung in Switzerland and in Istanbul where comparatively little smoke would be expected is against the importance of
CANCER OF THE LUNG IN RELATION TO TOBACCO
19
of this factor but in this country Stocks 1936 Kennaway and Kennaway 1947 and in Norway see above the mortality is higher in towns than in the country In all such comparisons one must consider at least three possible factors namely a smoking habits b facilities for diagnosis and treatment and c atmospheric pollution with products of the combustion of coal tar or of the
internal combustion engine 5 The indication that cigarettes are more active than cigars and pipe tobacco
in relation to cancer of the lung raises the question whether this difference is due a to the method of combustion or b to some property of cigarette tobacco One cannot answer this question at present but it is especially important in countries where smokers buy the cheaper pipe tobacco to make their own cigarettes In Norway one obtains in this way nearly twice as many cigarettes for a given sum Jakobsen personal communication One must consider three possibilities : 1 Pipe tobacco smoked in pipes 2 pipe tobacco smoked in cigarettes ; 3 cigar-
ette tobacco smoked in cigarettes 6 The data given and discussed above from this country Norway and
Switzerland show that the study of the relations of national consumption of
tobacco and national incidence of cancer of the lung has scarcely begun
SUMMARY
1 Estimations of arsenic in cigarettes from the United States Canada England Norway France Switzerland Italy Austria Poland and Bulgaria show on the whole a transition from the arsenic American type in the West to the
arsenic Turkish type in the East ; the latter is of course smoked in Western
countries also
In Yugoslavia Turkey Greece and Bulgaria the tobacco consumed is
almost wholly grown of Turkish type and in the form of ecigarettes 3 The high incidence of cancer of the lung at autopsy in one centre Istanbul
in country where Turkish tobacco is smoked almost exclusively shows that the arsenic content of tobacco has not provided any simple and exclusive explanation
of the association between cigarette smoking and this form of cancer Cancer
of the lung appears to be much less frequent at a centre in Yugoslavia Ljubljana
than at Istanbul More information from these and other Balkan countries is
very desirable
4 Norway imports U.S.A. and 9 per cent the lung upon the two 1:07 it is greater in
in men than in women
about 85 per cent of the tobacco consumed from the
from the Balkan countries The incidence of canceorf
sexes is not very different death rate male to female urban than in rural districts and this difference is greater
The increase in mortality in the last 20 years has been
greater in men than in women and greater in the towns than in the country 5 In Sweden snuff makes up a much larger fraction third in 1949 of
the total tobacco products consumed than is recorded in other countries 6 A comparison is made of the data available for the increases since 1931 in
a deaths attributed to cancer of the lung and b in the consumption of tobacco
in England and Wales Norway and Switzerland The consumption of tobacco per head has been for the last 10 years rather higher in Switzerland than in the United Kingdom and in Norway has been about half that in the other two countries while the crude death rates at the beginning and end of the period were
20
M. E. DAFF R. DOLL AND E. L. KENNAWAY
roughly in the proportion of 10 England and Wales to 5 Switzerland and 2
Norway Cigarette consumption was approximately in the proportion of 4 England and Wales to 2 Switzerland and 1 Norway and was more in accord with
the relative death rates The increase in the number of deaths has been about
the same twofold in all three countries but the increase in consumption of tobacco and cigarettes has been less The differences in the incidence of cancer of the
cigarettes lung are therefore quite different in extent from those in the
of tobacco
; quantity consumed they are more like though still different from thosein the quantity
of
consumed The study of the relation between the national con-
sumption of tobacco and the national incidence of cancer of the lung has scarcely
begun
We wish to thank Prof. Saglam and Prof. P. Schwartz of the University
Hribar of Istanbul and Prof.
Director of the Institute of Pathological
Anatomy and Dr. A. Kosir of the Clinical Hospital Ljubljana for their
generosity in allowing us to use their very valuable records We are indebted
to Prof. Leiv Kreyberg of Oslo Mr. Olaf Jakobsen of the Norwegian Embassy
Kantonspital the Prof. H. R. Schinz of the
Z^...richProf. H. v Meyenburg of
Pathological Institute Z^...rich Mr. S. T. Hisim of the Turkish Embassy Mr.
Legation Popov of the Bulgarian
Prof. Elis Berven of Stockholm Prof. H. E.
Rawlinson of the University of Alberta the Burcau F^'d^'ralde Statistique
Berne and the Direction G^'n^'radles Douanes Berne for their kindnessin supply-
ing us with statistical and other material In this countrycountry we have to thank
Dr. G. J. Cunningham Prof. D. F. Cappell Prof. A. Bradford Hill Prof. W.
Newcomb Dr. C. C. Spicer Dr. Percy Stocks Mr. H. L. Henderson Mr. R. E.
Waller and Miss Mary Atkin for help in various ways We wish to express our
gratitude to the British Empire CancerCampaign and the Anna Fuller Fund for
generous grants
REFERENCES
BRADFORD A. and FANING E. 1948 Brit J. indust Med 5. 2
Chief Inspector of FactoriesFactories and Workshops Ann Rep p 22. London H.M.
Stationery Office 1943 Ibid p 45
Bull CURRIE A. 1947 Brit med
4 402
Daff M. E. aND KENNAWAY E. 1950 Brit J. Cancer 4 173
DOLL R. AND BRADFORD 1950 Brit med J. ii 739
DUNGAL 1950 Lancet ii 245
HEADY J. A. AND
E. 1949 Brit J.
KENNAWAY Cancer HENRY S. 1950 Ann Roy Coll Sury England 7 425
Bulletin Hutson J. 1937 U.S. Dept. of Agric Technical
3 311 No. 587
KENNAWAY E. L. AND KENNAWAY N. 1947 Brit J. Cancer 1 260
MONTGOMERY H. AND WAISMAN M 1941 J. Invest Derm 4 365
NEUBAUER . 1947 Brit J. Cancer 1 192
SAGLAM 1944 Bull Fac Med Istanbul
Haziran 1944 p 3793
Yil 7 Sayi 2 Imumi No. 28 Nisan-
SEMON H. 1945 Proc Roy Soc Med 38 Section of Dermatology 128
Stocks Cancer 1936 Ann Rep Brit Emp
Camp 13 19476 Studies on
Regional Population Medical and
Cancer Death Rates
Subjects No. 1.
and Local Differences in
London H.M. Stationery Office
WYNDER E. AND GRAHAM E. 1950 J. Amer med Ass 143 329