Document 5kM2o4Rp90k3K88bXv00j8ED

FILE NAME: National Safety Council (NSC) DATE: 1935 Sept 28 DOC#: NSC309 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Letter from Donald Tulloch, Jr. to Philip Carey Co. RE Changes to License Agreement xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 16th Floor, Inquirer Bldg. Philadelphie, Pa. September 28, 193b Mr. Gr. '. Lillis, Jr. Philip Carey Company Loclcland, Cincinnati, Ohio Sear Mr. Mills; This will acknowledge yours of the 2bth with reference to schedules attached to proposed license agreement under Toohey Patpfjt. I appreciate the suggestions in your letter and 8tn adopting most of them. The others, I would like to go into further. The heading your propose for the list of Ilateriala seems to be entirely acceptable* Changes in items two, three, four, and five of the list of mater ials seems to be entirely' acceptable* Under six, however, the change favors a less desirable material ana I would like to think about it. Under seven, the new wor-ing is rather broad in its eifect, While all materials defined as you define then should and wi^l come Ui.der that class, there exist certain limited commitments on the part of one prospective licensee to which I will have to give con sideration. if you are willing to recognize this obligation, your wording is acceptable as to number of layers, As to the l/2" thick ness, does iir. Steffens approve this? The changes in item eight, nine, ten and eleverf are all acceptable. Under schedule one, page four, line thirty-one to thirty-three, I am still considering this whole question of unit prices and my inclination is to adopt your suggestion unless I see some real objection. Item seventeen whic.h.. you add on page five is agreeable^ae to. Bcipal and amount. I do not wish to put this iff a schedul e wh?cn~ will have general circulation however, and will give this per mission to licensees only by separate letter. You may accept this as authority for commissions roferreu to. I see no objection to changeB on page one of Schedule two. *>' Page two, Schedule two addition of l/fc" end l/8" to standards la acceptable. Change in line ten haB the effect of completely eliminating ite usefulness. Unless I can see some good reason, I cannot approve this. Page four, Schedule two change accepted. Page six, schedule two change accepted. Page seven, Schedule two change accepted. I'KIR S A L T R A D h i.'U.M ,\j j 3 CC>LA> "Exhibit V : / 7 ' & ; "ATTcR CF....................... WiTNLSS Page one, Schedule three change accepted. Page two, schedule three change suggested does not seem to con form to established merchandising practice. I would prefer to leave this in anu discuss it with your Change line twenty-one, page two, schedule three acceptable. Change line ten, page three, Schedule three acceptable. Change page one, wched-le four acceptable* Change page two, in schedule four acceptable. Change page four, Schedule four acceptable. Page one, schedule five change line nineteen does not conform to existing standards. Change page four, Schedule five, lines twenty-nine to thirty-two same objection as in previous schedules. Change line thirty-three acceptable. Page six, Schedule five, i think this should be changed to corr espond to previous policy, in other wofcds, use four decimals and if fifth decimal exceeds aero, increase fourth decimal one. If the changes made satisfy you, you csn sign your copy after hav ing inserted these changes either by covering letter or on attached schedules. If this is not satisfactory, I am wondering if we can't arrange to discuss it on the phone. If necessary, I will go to Cincinnati 6y3 u n m i r ' i n at n t r n a t i o n m Af-u to see you., 1th best regards, e i r -.'Ai. Tl'i A D E C O M M l SNA/*'. ^ f4 / 3 *t T pp w T r u s s ................................................ Vary truly yours, Donald Tullock, Jr. TuQ