Document 5L8rNye7jbaEZdn367QnRdE20
MONSANTO CHEMI L COMPANY
S From location : Texas City, Texas
Inter-Office Correspondence
c = C. L. Gilmore
date . November 20, 1962 object : SAFETY EQUIPMENT ISSUED TO CONTRACTORS
<
PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT
REFERENCE :
MON-495
TO N. F. Wood
Listed below is the safety equipment which was issued to various contractors during the October 15 shutdown and which has not been returned to date.
A. A. Pruitt Company -(Nothing returned on shutdown.) From: 9/20/62 Thru: 10/19/62
v/
Issued:
Hats
- 47 Ear
Glasses
- 214 Pr.
Cover Goggles - 28 Pr.
Rainsuits
- 15 Ea.
Boots
- 6 Pr.
Safety Belts - 2 Ea.
y Vacuum Tank Company
10/18/62
15 New 192 New
All New
32 Used 22 Used
Used Used Used
Issued:
Coveralls
- 2 Pr.
Used
'/
W. T. Powers Brick Contractor '10/17/62
Issued:
Hats
- 2 Ea.
Used
Glasses
- 3 Pr.
New
y Wm. C. Buchanan Company 10/31/62
Issued:
Dust Respirators 2 Ea.
Used
Mundet Cork 10/11/62
Issued:
.
Glasses
- 12 Pr.
Cover Goggles - 12 Pr.
New New
J. W. Leavesley & Sons 10/19/62
Issued:
Glasses
- 6 Pr.
New
LAM026348
m in 10
SC 18685
N. F. Wood
November 20, 1962
Page 2.
Farmers Marine & Copper Works
10/16/62 Issued:
4Hats
4 Glasses
10/22/62 Returned: 3
3
Balance Due:
1 Hat
1 Glasses
4 Goggles 2 2 Goggles
McDonough Iron Works
10/15/62 Issued: 17 Hats
11/ 7/62 Returned: 6
Balance Due:
11 Hats
22 Glasses 5
17 Glasses J
All New All New
Since the beginning of the program to furnish contractors with safety equipment, we have records of exactly what items of equip
ment have not been returned. If you are interested in these figures, please let us know.
TO: bs
LAM026349
Sc 18686
MONSANTO CHEMI L COMPANY
From locat.on : General Offices - St. Louis
inter 0ffic C o rre sponacnce
cc 1 Mr. R. R. Ludlam
Dear Gil:
'
To my knowledge., there is no Monsanto policy which says that you cannot recognize a contractor's safety performance by a plaque or certificate. I know of no other plant in Monsanto that does this, however.
I see no reason why your plant could not present some sort of recognition to contractors for good safety performance. As a matter of fact, it sounds like a good idea to me.
Best regards.
/dw
George L. Crarbell
UM026350
in :;
SC 18687