Document 5DVdp5jBdV5OLmMVBp4wQR8vz

P ^> -- f*Q t if CA-frd-^S PROGRESS REPORT TO THE WISCONSIN CONSERVATION DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ` FOR THE RESEARCH CONTRACT ON CHLORINATED ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS IN THE MILWAUKEE F.IVER Principal Investigators G. Fred Lee and Gilman D. Veith Water Chemistry Laboratory - University of Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin October, 1969 DSW 255175 STLCOPCB4060866 Chlorinated Organic Contaminants in the Milwaukee River Introduction The purpose of this study is to examine the chlorinated organic contaminants in the Milwaukee River fish, water and sediment with special consideration to possible contamina tion by the chlorinated biphenyls which are used as plasticizers. Before the results of the first three months of the study are summarized, however, it would be appropriate to reiterate the reasons this study is essential at this time and to discuss the chemistry of the chlorinated biphenyls in general. , Considerable effort has been'expended in the monitoring of chlorinated hydrocarbon concentrations in fish, birds and water from Wisconsin and Lake Michigan. Tne results have described the widespread presence of the commonly used pesticides such as dieldrin and DDT, as well as the metabolic intermediates such as DDE and DDD. Except in isolated instances, these organochlorine compounds are found at what is considered to be sublethal concentrations. Accordingly, the major concern with the presence of these chemicals in fish and wildlife has been that of the "long-range" effects such as adaptability, reproduction and perhaps extinction. In the last few years, the concern over pesticides in the environment has developed a new dimension in the reports of environmental contamination by the chlorinated biphenyls used in industry. Tnese compounds are widely used in the production of plastics, rubber, paints, dielectrics and packaging material throughout the world and are reportedly becoming widespread in the environment (Risebrough et al., 1968). The chlorinated biphenyls are prepared by chlorinating the biphenyl molecule as shown in Figure 1-a. The product is a complex mixture of chlorinated hydrocarbons containing between 1 and 10 chlorine atoms per molecule. Although over 200 compounds are theoretically possible, preliminary evidence indicates considerably fewer are present in commercial mixtures. The similarity of the chlorinated biphenyl structure to pp'DDT and pp'DDE is illustrated DSW 255176 STLCOPCB4060867 Figure 1- Structural shnilarHiis biv;cen tha cUTwtfisucsJ L'jpacn; la a.cd coznrnon. p^euciciGS,- ( XX XX a, Chlorinated biphenyl fx indicates possibly Ci puci/wne . ' for 1 -10 C'i at'tms)/ . ; ; i b, pp'DDT (2, 2-bis{p-d>i;oropfen;rt)-1,1, 1 \ Ij ii t CC12 c. pp'DDE (2.2 - bis'p ~chf.;rcpfcesr/}) 1,1 -tflchDra DSW 255177 1 J STLCOPCB4060868 -3- by comparing Figure la with Figures lb and lc respectively. The chemical similarities of the chlorinated biphenyls with other chlorinated pesticides also create the possibility of interferences in pesticide determinations. Figure 2 is a chromatogram of a commercially available chlorinated biphenyl mixture, and the retention times for the common pesticides .are indicated. It is evident that some interference would be experienced for many of the pesticides if this mixture were present in samples to be analyzed at sufficient concentrations. In addition, 7 chlorinated biphenyl mixtures, ranging from 21 to 62 percent chlorine, are prepared by Monsanto Company - under the name "Arochlor. " ' . s Figure 3 is a simulated chromatogram indicating the retention times of the com ponents of the chlorinated biphenyl mixtures. It should be pointed out that the compounds of the chromatograms in Figure 3 are not resolved completely by typical gas chromato graphy (GLC) conditions, but are partially superimposed such as in Figure 2. Also, since the mixtures are complex and unidentified, and since environmental samples may contain any combination of the 7 mixtures, there is no quantitative or qualitative method to examine the gross sample extracts. ' T Reports from Wisconsin (Degurse, 1969; Hickey, 1969) have indicated that fish and birds from the larger industrial centers contain many unidentified organo chlorine compounds which behave chemically as the chlorinated biphenyls. . Therefore, since the concentrations of these unidentified compounds are just becoming detectable, and it has been implicated that industry may be becoming a major source of these chlorinated hydrocarbons, chemical studies of the unidentified compounds are essential in order that early control measures can be exercised if necessary. Environmental Sampling As was previously stated, the purpose of this study is to investigate earlier reports that fish from the Milwaukee River contained many unidentified organochlorine compounds. DS\N 255178 STLCOPCB4060869 DSW 255179 STLCOPCB4060870 Figure 3, SJmuiuiedl Crircr.^ato^riin?. of ?n AxocfoWs AruoL-Mr IZ.II __ k._,'_____I. | :; ! ! J_t_j.lL! Aroda-iX 1232 !I! LMiUJlL AirotUox 1242 _1__ U_LJ.iL i i!! ML ArochLv 1248 A roc'h]ys 1234 Arodjior 1260 \ .1____ u .iJbluL___ !___i ID JJ.. iJl! LIillULILl Arrxu'L.c 1262 Common P{d3;icde3 i iJJjIll t? Z c- qL i,-;w .. Q OQ Q 'a*-;: , i r,\ qoPPu^M^-u V&Vass <e a . . . . _JJ.LiXJ.i- 31,0 27,0 23.0 19 0 15.0 11,0 V Tima; (nnniiies) 7,,0 3,0 10 (\ DSW 255180 STLCOPCB4060871 -6- Therefore, 11 sites on or near the river have been tentatively established for environmental sampling. Many of the locations were selected because fish samples were available from other WCD studies. . Figure 4 is a map of the stud'r area with the sampling sites numbered 1 through 11. Site 1 is a tributary on County road "O" just below a plastics manufacturing firm. Sites 2 and 3 are located about 200 yards above the dams at Grafton and Thiensville, respectively. Site 4 is below the Thiensville dam and just above the Hwy. 167 bridge. Sites 5 and 6 are 200 yards above the dams at Glendale and Estabrook Park, respectively. Site 7 is just below the North Avenue dam and site 8 is at the Broadway Avenue bridge. Site 9 and 10 are *' located about 200 yards above the mouths of the Menomonee and Kinnickinnic rivers, respectively, where these rivers join the Milwaukee River. Finally, site 11 is located in the center of the harbor breakwater opening. Preliminary Water Analysis The sampling locations were sampled on August 13-15, 1969, for routine water analysis and pesticide analysis.. Samples were obtained just below the surface at each site and in the center of the main channel. In addition, dissolved oxygen (DO) and tempera ture profiles were obtained where possible. Glass carboys (20 1.) were filled at approxi mately the 0. 5 meter depth and were sealed with aluminum foil for pesticide analysis. The data from the first sampling are presented in Table 1. In general, the DO, pH and suspended solids concentration were much higher in the water above the dam than in the lower part of the river. For example, above the dam at Grafton, the water contained 10.0 mg/1 DO, 60.5 mg/1 suspended solids, and a pH of 8.7. On the other hand, the water at the Buffalo Avenue bridge in Milwaukee contained 4. 2 mg/1 DO, 14.7 mg/1 suspended solids, and a pH of 7.7. The relatively high DO and pH can be explained by the photosynthetic processes of plankton, and the high suspended solids in the quiet waters behind the dams appeared to be essentially planktonic. The water in the lower river was characterized by low DO and suspended solids DSW 255181 STLCOPCB4060872 iT;'-;:.i' 4, RiR'er S`<;uy Ax*.;> STLCOPCB4060873 242 257 27. 5 (5) 245 2 5 .0 ( 1) 251 232 196 28 (5) 145 20 (5) 131 23 (5) 23 (5) 127 17 (5) 118 8 .9 ( 10) fi U W o*<r $ 8 o cQ 8 o CN IO in aa c2n *Q ^ CO CN CN CN 3 bO H CO CN O' xm> CoO CN in o o o NO f- VO o NO <u ^ gw CN o 5g NO o CO N< cn 1 d NN in H N1* . o' HH in in Q.C> w o M CO a> > rtu G *t; CocuOn 3 e j* V-< Oo3ca ~.GowoN o NO o CN O CN r>- o N1 ; 1 in cn t'* s m o in in VO in co N* O CN Ni* O Og CO U o n 4G-> CO vO O cl-di "cUc<J rt JC O J2 < >^ < ^ aJ n G 3 G o 33 a, 00 . 00 0 O' ^ CO 1 1 CN 1 o 'O d 1 O' CO CN CO o r-* r- 00 \ G 3q O bp O 00 NO O CN NN NO in CO CN in NN NO CN t"- o Q O O oo . CO OS o I--t in tH in H oo co N< CO CO* CO N1 in 00 O' /*s m D..-* m o m O <u o vo m CN CN CN ltT in' "w* CN o o o tN CN Jn d CO SO CN CN CN in & <--s in o' H 2) u? 1 -4' G O- O NO o 1 1 CO OO o r- o o -H rH o CO Q> KJ2 a ---as Qw CO o' -H H CN m CO TJ1 o'- o CN in o r~~ N5 O' o o H V o H & CN CO tjt m NO t** 00 O' o co DSW 255183 STLCOPCB4060874 -9- concentrations, lower pH, and lower temperature. In addition, the alkalinity and con ductivity decreased downstream from site 7 from 196 mg/1 and 642 Umhos/cm, respectively, to 118 mg/1 and 420 umhos/cm at site 11. This decrease may be due to the input of Lake Michigan vwater near site 7. Blooms of algae and schools of goldfish were observed at site 7, but within a half-mile downstream, no algae or fish were evident and the DO dropped sharply. Oil films and floating objects were continuous in the lower river. Development of Analytical Procedures '! - - The analytical procedures used in this study are intended to include the general ." . \ ; class of organochloriue molecules, and not to be selective for specific chlorinated pesti cides. The basic methods are widely accepted, and only slight modifications as described by Degurse (1969) and Reynolds (1969) have been introduced. Extraction. Fish are homogenized while frozen (-20C) by grinding at the Nevin Fish Hatchery laboratory. Approximately 10 gm of the frozen sample are blended with 70 gm Na^SOy (anhydrous) until the mixture appears dry. The sample is then extracted for 3. 5 hours in an all-glass Soxhlet using a mixture cf hexane and ethyl ether (1:1 v/v, r 170 ml). The extract is concentrated to 15 ml in an air stream. Water Samples (20 1.) are batch-extracted with hexane in 2-liter separatory funnels. The samples are not filtered because the effect of filtering large volumes cf turbid water on pesticide recovery has not been evaluated. Hexane (400 ml) is placed in 6 funnels, and the water (1600 ml) is introduced in the first 3 funnels. After repeated shaking and settling, the aqueous layers are drained into the 3 remaining funnels. The process is repeated until the 20-liter sample is extracted twice. The hexane portions are concen trated to 15 ml for separate cleanup before they are combined. ; Air-dried plankton (less than 1 gm) and sediment samples (10-30 gm) are extracted for 30 hours in an all-glass Soxhlet using the azeotrope of hexane and acetone (41:59, 170 ml) as has been described by Veith (1958). The extract is evaporated to 15 ml in an air stream after adding an excess of hexane. : 0SVM2551&4 STLCOPCB4060875 -10- Extract Cleanup. The cleanup of extracts on Florisil has been studied at the Water Chemistry Laboratory (Hughes, 196S; Veith, 1968). In general, most pesticides can be separated from the bulk of the interferences on a Florisil column because fats, oils, pigments, etc., are retained on the column, waxes and relatively non-polar com pounds pass with' the hexane solvent front and can be discarded with the first 30 ml of eluate, and the majority of organochlorine pesticides can be eluted with 175 ml of 15 per cent ethyl ether in hexane. Reynolds (1969) has reported that chlorinated biphenyls are quantitatively removed from Florisil by 200 ml hexane, along with heptachlor, aldrin, and DDE/. Lindane (y <-BHC), heptachlor epoxide, DDD, DDT and dieldrin are not eluted with hexane but can be recovered by elution with 200 ml of 20 percent ethyl ether in hexane. Thus, this latter group of pesticides could presumably be analyzed without possible inter ference by the chlorinated biphenyls. ` * Florisil (Kensington Scientific) is extracted in an all-glass Soxhlet for 24 hours with the azeotrope of hexane and acetone in an'effort to remove traces of organic impurities. The solvent .is evaporated from the Florisil at 105C and thef solid is heated at 650C for 2.5 hours. If not used immediately after heating, the Florisil is warmed to 105C just prior to its use. ' . The Florisil (30 gm) is vibrated into a 25 mm O. D. glass column fitted with a glass frit and Teflon stcpcock. The column is topped with 10 gm anhydrous to prevent deactivation from water in the sample. Fish, water, plankton and sediment extracts (15 ml) are placed on the dj:y column and eluted with 250 ml of 15 percent ethyl ether in hexane. The eluant is concentrated in an air stream. With this procedure, only extracts from low-fat fish are suitable for GLC analysis. . Repeated chromatography on Florisil is necessary to remove the final traces of interferences and to obtain the separation of several pesticides as is described by Reynolds (1969). Florisil columns (19 gm) are prepared as above. The samples from the 30 gm Florisil column is concentrated to 15 ml and placed on the 19 gm column. Elution with DSW 255185 STLCOPCB4060876 -11- hexane (200 ml) is begun at 3-5 ml/min.to obtain DDE, heptachlor, aldrin, toxaphene and chlorinated biphenyls, if present. The receiving flask is changed and the column is eluted with 20 percent ethyl ether in hexane (200 ml) to obtain DDT, DDD, dieldrin, heptachlor epoxide, and lindane, if present. The samples are concentrated to appropriate volumes for GLC analysis. . Based on preliminary data, the above procedure results in excellent cleanup of fish, water and suspended solids analysis. Figure 5^ is a chromatogram of a fish extract from Estabrook Park after cleanup with hexane. Figure 5b is the corresponding chroma togram of the 20 percent fraction. Both chromatograms have a rapid return to baseline following the solvent peak which suggests that cleanup is complete. In 5b, it is indicated f that dieldrin is present by the first peak, and either op'DDT and/or pp'DDD is present by the second peak. Confirmation of op'DDT could be made by dehydrohalogenation with KOH/EtOrl since op'DDT is converted to op'DDE and pp'DDD would be converted to op'DDMU. ' . As is seen in Figure 5a GLC chromatograms of the extracts from Milwaukee River, samples are difficult to interpret because of the numbers of components present. A variety of GLC conditions have been studied in an effort to gain maximum resolution in a practical analysis time. Liquid phases which have been used include DC-200, OV-101, OV-17, FFAP, XE-60 and QF-1. It is evident that OV-101 is a very suitable non-polar solvent. Also, more polar mixtures of FFAP/XE-60 (1:1) and QF-l/OV-17 (2:1) resulted in good separation but the analysis time was increased to over 65 minutes. Therefore, to obtain the satisfactory resolution in less time, it was necessary to employ low-loaded, etched-glass beads as supports for the polar phases. The glass beads (GLC-110, 120-140 mesh) were coated with 0. 05 and 0.18 percent of the FFAP/XE-60 (1:1) and QF-l/OV-17 (2:1) mixtures. The evaluation of these phases has not been completed. Nonetheless, all chromatograms presented in this report were obtained from 7 ft,x 1/8 in. columns packed with the 0. 05 percent QF-l/OV-17 mixture DSW 255186 STLCOPCB4060877  1 m..J >.v r> CU.'.WiU;> - '< ,w DSW 255187 STLCOPCB4060878 -13on the glass beads. A N2 flow of 27 ml/min was maintained in an Aerograph 1520-B gas chromatograph which is equipped with concentric tube electron capture detectors. The column, detector, and injector temperatures were 180C, 215C and 230C, respectively. Experimental Results The initial objectives of this study have been to determine the relative amounts of chlorinated organic compounds in fish and water from the Milwaukee River. The research approach has been to attempt to duplicate existing procedures for fish analysis, and then to investigate the occurrences of unidentified compounds which have been found by Degurse (1969). Degurse has noted that "obscure peaks" begin to appear in chromatograms of fish . extracts.as sampling becomes nearer to industrial centers such as Milwaukee. Indeed, t' in some of the fish near Milwaukee, the pesticide peaks are not detectable in large numbers of unidentified peaks. These observations, along with the fish samples provided, have enabled this laboratory to establish a study area immediately rather than monitoring many areas of Wisconsin to find the more frequently occurring unidentified compounds. Fish Extracts. To achieve the'initial objectives, fish from along the river from County road "H" bridge north of West Bend to Milwaukee \yere analyzed. It immediately became apparent that the complexity of the organochlorine mixtures in the fish was so great that quantitative analyses were not realistic. Consequently, the data are presented in the form of chromatograms which represent equal amounts of fish. In this manner, the relative amounts of organochlorine compounds can be compared directly. Figures 6a, 6b and 7 are chromatograms of fish extracts from County road "H" bridge (Washington County), Grafton and Estabrook Park, respectively. It should be pointed out that the response in 6a is multiplied by a factor of 4 to observe the peaks; so a direct comparison with 6b or 7 would require the peaks first be reduced by a factor of 4. It is evident that these figures substantiate the v/ork of Degurse in that the numbers and relative magnitudes of the uniden tified peaks increases about 20-fold in fish from Milwaukee in comparison to fish from Washington County. These results also suggest that the contamination may be of industrial DSW 255188 STLCOPCB4060879 B, Carp, Grates te.rn (Aitei'uatec1 X32) 23,0 19.0 11,0 Time- A. 3aJU.'iPd, H-vy. H l:ride 'Vis^Lr.giva CjjV\>`c/ ^A?frnoaCod X3) DSW 255189 STLCOPCB4060880 Figure'/, Goldfish from ISs-.-abvoak Park (Aireau-itcd X32) Time- (mt.TiUt'.ew) DSW 255190 STLCOPCB4060881 -16- origin, or at least associated with metropolitan centers. Water Extracts. Approximately 20 liters of water from the Milwaukee River sampling sites were extracted and concentrated about 2, 000-fold. The highest levels of organochlorine Compounds (on a comparative basis) were found near Estabrook Park. Figure 8 presents a chromatogram of the water extract from Estabrook Park which illustrates that many unidentified compounds are present, although at very low levels. Once again, the complexity of the mixtures makes quantitative and/or qualitative analysis impossible at this time. . ' . \ number of the peaks in the chromatogram in Figure 8 have retention times similar to heptachlor epoxide, dieldrin and pp'DDE. However, these same peaks and others also have retention times similar to components of technical chlordane and several chlorinated biphenyl mixtures. Thus, the possible serious errors which are introduced into an analysis become evident when the analyst interprets retention time data in GLC chromatograms as qualitative data. It may be much more meaningful to interpret chromatograms of unidentified compounds in terms of what chemicals are not present, rather than assign identities to peaks which are present. Characterization of Unidentified Compounds. Although it is apparent that chroma tograms cannot be interpreted as a means of identification in many cases, the appearance of general peak patterns such as peak shoulders, doublet peaks and relative peak heights of major peaks is of interest to the analyst. For example, Figure 9a is a chromatogram of a carp extract from the Grafton area and shows a very strikingly similar pattern to Figure 9b, which is a chromatogram of 10 ng of the chlorinated biphenyl mixture, Arochlor 1260. If the total areas of each chromatogram are calculated, it might be concluded that the carp near Grafton contain approximately 12 ug/gm of equivalent Arochlor 1260 (the concentration of each individual component would be substantially less), and that Arochlor 1260 is being used and discharged into the river in or near Grafton. However, while these comparisons are interesting and provide the analyst with a "best guess" in directing further DSW 255191 STLCOPCB4060882 Time (in tan tew) DSW 255192 STLCOPCB4060883 K'jvjwv ), ("> 'Vi;'-..;:, -.it j-isif r'C' C; V- f f * ; 1U J\ruCltiUi* lA/i> l. .ill si. iil" U. J ilipiii.'Jiyl STLCOPCB4060884 -19- research, they are only presumptive evidence and it would be improper to assign a chemical identification to any of the components with the information available. It is also interesting to compare the chromatograms of fish extracts from Estabrook Park to those from Grafton. For example, in comparing Figure 9a with Figure 7, it is apparent that earlier eluting major peaks are more prominent as the samples are obtained from further downstream in the river. By the same analogy used above, it might be con cluded that the goldfish at Estabrook Park contained approximately 15 ug/gm of an equivalent Arochlor (chlorinated biphenyl mixture) with an average chlorine content of slightly less than that predominant at Grafton. By comparison, the fish extract is similar to either Arochlor 1248 or 1254 (containing 48 and 54 percent chlorine, respectively). If this were true, it might be concluded either that lower chlorine-content Arochlor mixtures are used and discharged in or near Estabrook Park and the Arochlor 1260 from upstream at Grafton was removed by the river sediments, etc., or that the Milwaukee River has received contamination from a source above Grafton and the mixture of chlorinated organic com pounds is being selectively degraded as it is carried downstream. (Toxaphene is thought to be selectively degraded, presumably by removing chlorine'atoms; environmental samples show a similar shift to earlier eluting major peaks in chromatograms,(Hughes and Lee, 1967).) However, all of the above reasoning is derived from presumptive data, and it is not the intention of this report to conclude that the unidentified compounds are t ; . chlorinated biphenyls, that they are of industrial origin or that the numbers presented in the discussion are realistic outside the context of use. Conclusion The data in the form of GLC chromatograms indicate that unidentified compounds are present in fish and water extracts after routine pesticide analysis of samples from the Milwaukee River downstream from Grafton. Similar data indicated that the unidentified compounds were not present (or at least were present at much lower levels) in samples from the West Bend area. These DSW 255194 STLCOPCB4060885 References Degurse, P. , Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Nevin Fish Hatchery, Personal Communication (1969). Hickey, J. J.Wildlife Ecology, Univ. of Wisconsin, Personal Communication (1969), Hughes, R.A., "Persistence of Toxaphene in Natural Waters" M. S. thesis, Water Chemistry, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison (1968). Hughes, R. A. and Lee, G. Fred, "Persistence of Toxaphene in Treated Lakes" Progress Report to Wisconsin Conservation Division, October 1 (1967), mimeo, 10 p. Reynolds, L. M., "Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Their Interference in Pesticide Analayis" Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 4(3), 128-143 (1969). Risebrbugh, R. W., Rieche, P. , Herman, S. G. , Peakall, D. B. and Kirven, M. N., "Polychlorinated Biphenyls in the Global Ecosystem" Nature 220, 1098-il02 (1968). Veith, G. D., "Role of Lake Sediments in the Water Chemistry of Toxaphene" M. S. thesis, Water Chemistry, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison (1968). DSW 255195 STLCOPCB4060886 APPENDIX To supplement this report, a study of the present state of knowledge of chlorinated biphenyl compounds as it appears in the literature is presented. This review is intended for publication by the principal investigators. i i f DSIN STLCOPCB4060887