Document 59QyVv8XO4zO6bjOo3VQjexD
ENCLOSURE 4
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ' ^*cun3t^u^;i^ Sufccy anJ Health Atlininmratiun
/S'Nv j? 875
VA51HKOTON, D.C. 20U0
V,/ftbJ
Hr. R. R. pooler# Jr. Vinyl Chlorico Rosins-Manager
f Onion Carbido Corporation 270.Park Avcnua
Hew York, Hew York 10017
uhm'**
-
. *
R ^ VftitElW JR-
,, ..
Dear Mr. hosier:
.
.
* *
9
This is in response to your joint letter with Mr. John
* Whittlesey dnted June 17,.1S75, petitioning for modifi-
' 'cations of the Exposure to Vinyl Chloride Standard,
.`;29 CFR 1910.1017 (formerly 1910.93 recodified May 20,
1075).-
. Tliere are no plans presently to amend the Vinvl Chloride
Sffjujtdnro. hTrevised" program air e c tive is eon temp la ted,
-* aitnougrT we are not certain as to the date it will be
. available. Please be assured that your comments and
suggestions are greatly appreciated and they will be
considered fully in the revision of the program directive.
In the meantime, the following administrative decisions
- have been made: '
- J
*
m
'* -- *.' * /
1; 29 CFR 1910.1017(a) and (b)(5) Sccpe and application
(^-}7 (3)`find (b) Definitions (G)
.,
* * ",
The standard defines a fabricated product as being one
which is "made v/holly or partly from polyvinyl chloride,
* and vrhich does not require further processing at temp
eratures, .and for times, sufficient to cause macs melting
'of the polyvinyl chloride' resulting in the release of
vinyl chloride."
.
"Release of vinyl chloride" means the release of an amount of vinyl chloride which would likely result in employee exposure at or above the action level
' without regard to the use of engineering controls. products which can be classified as fabricated products are exempt from the provisions-of the vinyl chloride standard. All other products are subject to the re quirements of the standard. If the employer uses or manufactures a product v:hich is not a fabricated product, he must initiate monitoring procedures. If the monitoring reveals that the employees are not exposed to vinyl chloride at or above .the action level, the employer's operations will be exempt from the
* :-
4
VC5586
2.
provisions of the standard. However, if the monitoring
reve-als exposure at or above the .action level, the
employer must implement the procedures specified
in the standard. **
2. 29 CFR 1910.1017(b) Definitions (5).
The petition requests that the definition of "emergency" be revised to include specific examples, such as fire and explosion. We agree that the definition might well be expanded to include examples. Again," this matter will be addressed-in a program directive and not as an cincndinent to the standard.
The definition of a "massive release" as being "greater
than 100 parts per million (ppm)" found in the current
Program Directive 200-35, vill also be addressed in a
revised directive. We agree that the 100 ppm should
be changed. -
*
*
3. *29 CFR 1910.1017(d) Monitoring (4) -
**
*
The intent of paragraph (d)(4) is that tKe employer shall be 95% confident that his monitoring result is
with5.n 25%, 35% or 50% of the actual value depending on the concentration. ' Therefore, ..an employer using a' method v;hich has proven vinyl chloride detection
accuracy of 25% or less need take only one(measure ment regardless of the actual vinyl chloride monomer concentration. In concentration ranges where accura
cies of 35% or 50% are required, the employer need take only one measurement if the method accuracy is less than the specified accuracy. With methods
of unknown accuracy or having errors greater than the specified accuracy requirements, repeated measure ments are necessary. In these cases, one may use the coefficient of variation (CV) as a parameter to judge whether or not a sampling procedure is adequate to. meet the,standard. The CV in percentage units is defined as the standard deviation of the method, times 100, divided by permissible exposure limit. The required CV of the procedure is obtained by dividing the required accuracy by 1.96 (2 value for p5% confidence).
Thus* for accuracies of 25%, 35% and 50%, method CV
valuer, should be less than 12.0%, 17,9%, and 25.5%
respectively.
VC5587
/
3.
*
*
To repast/ there are no plans presently to amend the
standard but your comments on monitoring will be con
sidered in the program directive revision and also
.In future rulemaking where monitoring io a requirement. *
4 29 CFR 1910.1017(j) Training.
The standard does not specify a level of exposure to
trigger training activities. Section 6(b)(7) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 provides that employees shall be apprised of the nature of the hazardous substances v:ith which they come in contact.
. (*
The evidence i?e have compiled on vinyl chloride has indicated that it is sufficiently hazardous to warrant .
training for all personnel who have any possibility of coining in contact with vinyl chloride. There is always 'the opportunity for accidents to occur and em ployees should be awar-e of the possible consequences. There has also been soma indication that storage con
tainers may yield high concentrations of vinyl chloride
when opened after transporting.
1
4
Therefore, it is not likely that the training provisions will be amended. For those operations covered by the standard, training is a requirement.
5. 29 CFR 1910.1017(e), Signs and labels (4)
If there are situations where the blended polyvinyl
chloride must be labeled yet contains less than 0.5
ppm residual vinyl chloride monomer, the following'
wording may be used:
. ;*
c'
BLENDED POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (FVC) v
'*
* * CONTAINS TRACE AMOUNTS { 0.5 ppm)
? OF VINYL CHLORIDE.
a *
.
VINYL CHLORIDE IS A CANCER-SUSPECT AGENT.
VC5588
' He hope that the above clarifications will satisfy your petition for modification and amendment of the vinyl chloride standard. As previously stated,
. there are no plane presently to formally amend the * standard. There will be an addendum or modifica
tion of the Program Directive 5200-35. Should you wish to discuss any matter further do not hesitate to contact me or members of ny staff. Sincerely,
Associate Assistant Secretary `for Regional Programs
*
VC5589