Document 553xQ1g5yXGdGLb3EMZM35Je

existed prior to 1976 when more accurate data was unavailable? If not, what changes should be nade to more adequately develop employee and former employee historical data? Are our present (post 1976) methods of determining exposure scientifically reliable? 3. At a maximun or l f/cc, what is the expected incidence of lung cancer, mesothelioma and asbestosis that would be forecasted----------------- ---- at Libby? ff/S 3a. At a maximui of 1 f/ccA7...? . ' , V\ ' `ff'' 3b. Ata maximua of 0.5 f/cc^..? - -------- - ----! 3c. What is the impact of other factors such as nuisance dust.-SBSSSs--. and smoking on the aforementioned statistics? ,,. ___________ __ __ ."nriws V.te-': 15077585 : j .:!& v -> PipfeJsSaspaB^ through7 2000' should be based&bo* "... . .... " ^______ ..-.ureSTevelsv ' any;ind!vidual and^continued emp ** _ population; i.e.,na saokershave{_ hired** WPr-fr-' ivl.'ft.' :. '--' JVf ^>:^.'f4S*''-!?4-.v--**': ^43--W- V ? '41:-il'MSKpP existing.saokers are, continuing to de __--------- king^4Sy|:$"; .' *.- ^-.-vi.&*&--------, their ;:.v-v:;s v>:^7W- fow-v-V; 4a. Assuming the same data as above, except assuming a 2% per year increase in the labor headcount. (This is based on an assuMd increase of 31 per year growth in the demand from Libby, coupled VJ with improved prorwabil wy which results in the headcount increase of 21 per year.) ^cr / / '*<T 'i';*2ES553SBBS*s**^ *zsza*-^*.^ - ------------------- I50775g r