Document 4azM7wMy4MEErkG6vEOp4K1zx
The News and Observer
/ advise and enjoin those who direct the paper in the tomorrows never to advocate any cause for personal profit or preferment. ! would wish.it always to be "the tocsin" and to devote itself to the policies ofequality andjustice to the underprivileged. Ifthe paper should at any time be the voice of self-interest or become the spokesman of privilege or selfishness it would- be untrue to its history. -- JOSEPHUS DANIELS. Editor and Publisher 1894-1948
This newspaper's opinion
A mis
v
Wednesday, September 29,1982
Has it become obligatory for any one identified as a civil rights lead
er to go to jail in Warren County? Judging from the arrest Monday of Congressional Delegate Walter E.
Fauntroy of the District of Colum bia, it would appear so. Fauntroy was charged with impeding a truck
headed for the state PCB landfill.
Instead of interfering with this
state's lawful resolution of a prob
lem that has faced blacks and
whites in 14 counties, Fauntroy
might well be protesting actions of
the U.S. Justice Department and
the Department of Housing and Ur
ban Development.
;
While Fauntroy was making his
pilgrimage to North Carolina, the
Justice Department was saying that
it might asK the courts to dismantle
court-ordered busing plans affect
ing several major U.S. cities. The
nation's chief law-enforcement
agency has begun to side with the
Opponents of tne use of busing as
one of the permissible tools to bring
school systems into compliance
with the law.
.
f Instead of kneeling in front of a
truck near Afton, Fauntroy could have been back in Washington rais ing his voice against HUD's propos
al to distort the intent of community
development block grants. Con
gress intended these grants to cities to provide benefits for low- to mod
erate-income people. But HUD wants to back off that requirement.
tance. In the face of all this, the ac
tivists center their attention on
something in Warren County that
essentially is. an environmental is
sue -- and an issue on which state
government has sought to act
responsibly.
'
Among the participants in the rit
ual of protest and arrest have been
leaders of the Southern Christian
Leadership Conference, the Rev.
Leon White, the Rev. Ben Chavis,
Floyd McKissick, Fauntroy and
other civil rights figures. But the
larger, tougher demands of political
leadership for the black and the
poor wonr be won by brief personal
or organizational publicity shots on
the evening news,.
.
It's as if the activists had de
spaired of getting a handhold on the slippery mass of Reagan rollbacks
in social programs. So they were happy to find something in North
Carolina -- or anywhere -- that
they could devote their time and en ergies to.
It's a pity. The activists had their priorities straight when they marched for and worked for the ex tension of the Voting Rights Act by Congress. But by turning to civil disobedience on an environmental issue in North Carolina, they have ventured far afield from gaining useful political results for their con stituents.
The Reagan administration has provided plenty of issues for anyone who speaks for poor and black Americans. Look at reductions of general federal. assistance for the
floor, cuts in student aid, school
unches and other nutrition pro grams, day care and medical assis
PCB-ARCH-EXT0378519