Document 4abGmRy2akqXxo7D1X5OrenZN
8 February 1967
Mr. L. C. Fuhrmeister '
Technical Services Superintendent
Monsanto Chemical Company
Anniston, Alabama 3o201
'
^ & a C> l2~ C~ ^
x^
--i"?
Dear Mr. Fuhrmeister:
Enclosed is a description of our findings since the last progress report.
We have been unable to demonstrate any reason why large fish kills should occur in Choccolocco Creek.
I received your notice of Mr. Carder's visit. Since I
teach two classes on Thursday morning, I am hoping that it will
be convenient for me to meet with you on Friday the 24th at 8
AM. Should this be impossible, I will attempt to make arrangements
for Thursday.-
''
Sincerely,
Enclosure DSF:wb
Denzel Professor of
DSW 162370
STLCOPCB4040945
ES-XC5'SUPr3! STATS'
u
DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY P.O. DRAWER Z STATE COLLEGE, MISSISSIPPI 37762 PHONE (601) 323-4321, EXT. 305
Progress Report- January
On January 24 dissolved oxygen measurements were taken at several sampling sites by the Winkler Method. Water temperatures and pH-values were recorded at the same time. These data are summarized below:
Location
Time
Water . Temp. (C)
PH D. 0. (ppm)
Surface
Elbow Depth
1. Choccolocco Creek: 11 A.M. Bridge - 4 mi. E.
of Boiling Springs
2. Anniston Sewage Treatment Plant: (Pinal tank)*
12 A.M.
3. Monsanto Sewage Treatment Facility at outfall to city.
2 P.M. '
4. Snow Creek -
2:30 P.M.
outfall from Monsanto
Plant (Front ditch
at fence)
5. Choccolocco'Creek 3:30 P.M. at Hiway 93 Bridge
14 7.8 10.8 10.0
21 7.2 3.8 31 7.6 4.7
**
** ,
34 0.7 ' None Detected
#*
14.5
7.5
8.5
8.5
* The basin contained a large amount of .foam. '
-a-* Wot measured.
The D. 0. values for the Choccolocco Creek sites are weil within
safe limits. Barring adverse effects of detergents and low nocturnal
D.O.-values fish might even survive in the Anniston Sewage Treatment
Plant. Although the front ditch from the Monsanto Plant contained no
measurable D.O. and had a very low pH, (Our tests have previously
shown that bluegills die in 20 minutes at pH 3*0) both pH and D.O. are normal at the downstream Choccolocco Creek site (Hiway 93 Bridge)..
DSW 162371
STLCOPCB4040946
o anuary Progress Report Page 2
Ive have completed preliminary studies to determine possible synergistic action of mercury and parat'nion. On January 18, four 15-gallon aquaria were prepared with the following test solutions: 1) 20 liters of 100 ppb HgCl2 solution; 2) 20 liters of 100 ppb parat'nion; 3) 20 liters of solution in which both HgCl2 and parat'nion were present at 100 ppb concentrations; 4) 20 liters of tap water as a control. Each aquarium was stocked with 25 medium sized green sunfish (Lepomis cyanellus).
The following table shows the number of survivors.
100 ppb HgCl2
100 ppb Parat'nion
Mixture 100 ppb HgCl2 and Parathion
Tap water Control
:;o. Fish
25' . " '
. 25
'
25
25
12 hours 24 hours 36 hours 60 hours
25 25 25 25
23 24
18 '
23
15 18
12
. . 25 25 25 ' 25
On February 3> the test was repeated using 20 green sunfish in
each aquarium but 200 ppb HgClg- The numbers of survivors were as
follows:
.
DSW 162372
> STLCOPCB4040947
January Progress Report
Page 3
.
ICO ppb EgCl2
Fish
12 hours 24 hours 36 hours 43 hours 60 hours 72 hours
20
20 20 20 20 20 20
100 ppb Parathion
Mixture 100 ppb HgCl2 and Parathion
Tap water Control
20 20
20
O
C\J
20 20 19 15 * 13 ' 10
20 20 20.;... 20 16
13
20
20 20 20 20
These findings provide no evidence of synergistic activity. On
the contrary, it appears possible that mercury may exert a slight
antagonistic effect on parathion activity. We plan to repeat these
studies using hluegills.
.
On February 2, bluegills were collected from Country Club Lake. This fish population is used to stock cages in Choccolocco Creek. . Three acuaris were prepared, one containing 25 ppb parathion, a second containing 100 ppb parathion, and another as a tap water control. Twelve fish were placed in each aquarium for 12 hours, after which the cholinesterase levels of these fish were determined. Each sample in this test represents the''brains of two fishes.
Sarnies
.
2-5 are fish exposed to 100 ppb parathion 6-10 are fish exposed to 25 ppb parathion 11-15 are control fish.
DSW 162373
STLCOPCB4040948
January Progress Report Rage 4
The results of these tests are shown in the following table:
0's0
O
0 0
Sample i\0.
isi'c.i.n ^t.
Optical Density
2 76.7 ng 3 91.4 ng .100 L 76.0 Kg .010 5 96.5 3Bg .025
M ACTh Hydrolyzed 20* 60
^Specific Activity
Average Percent Inhibition
0.S5 1.36 0.44 0.60
2.85 4.08 1.32 1.80
0.81 1.16 0.39 0.51
.72
/ . --
VJI
CM
CO
0tO
6 76.2 Kg
7 7o.7 ng 8 . 70.6 Eg ___ -055
9 770 ng 10 72.p Kg
.045 .080
"
0.85 1.05 0.90 0.80 1.16
2.55 3.15 2.70 2.40 3.48
0.73 0.90 0.77 ' . 0.68 0.99
*; * 83.I Eg 12 . 81.4 ng 13 8O.6 Eg -4 86.2 ng --S ' 76.5 ng
.145 .120 . .1-45 .165 195
1.81 1.57 1.81 2.01 2.32
5.43 4.71 . 5.43 6.03 6.96.
1.55 1.34 1.55 1.72 1.99
1.63
Speer fie Active'ey ji M ACh hydrolyzea/hour/ng brain weight
5035
DSW 162374
/
'
STLCOPCB4040949
oanuary Progress Eeport Page 5
On January 25, 1967 water samples were collected for gas chromatographic analyses. At the same time, hluegills that had "been caged 2 weeks in Choccolocco Creek upstream and downstream iron Anniston were collected for analyses. The findings are shown in the following table (water samples are given in ppb; fish in ppm):
Locality
Sample
Pesticides
Choccolocco Creek Bridge - Water (1000 ml);
4 miles E. Boiling Springs
Choccolocco Creek Bridge 4 miles E. Boiling Springs
2 Bluegills (8.58 g)
Anniston Sewage Treatment
Plant
___
Water (1000 ml). .
Monsanto Treatment facility Water (1000 ml), (at outfall to city)
Snow Creek (Front Bitch
at outfall from Itforsanto
Plant)
Water (1000 ml), '
Choccolocco Creek at Hiway 93 Bridge
Water (1000 ml).
Choccolocco Creek at Hiway 93 Bridge
2 Bluegills (8.47 g)
DSW 162375
DDE 0.2 ppb (3 unidentified peaks, one very close to malathion)
DDE 0.143 ppm (3 unidentified peaks matching those in control fish from the State College population).
DDT 1'.7 ppb
'
Parathion 3*0 ppb
Heptachlor Epoxide ?
7 unidentified peaks
Trace
.
Extremely high background after clean-up on florisil. High EC response, even after dilution of the sample, prevented analysis.
11 unidentified peaks, several having retention times similar to pesticides. Some of these same peaks reappear in fish caged downstream.
DDT 0.3 ppb
t
DDE Trace
DDD 0.2 ppb ^
Parathion 1.5 ppb
3 unidentified peaks, one very .
close to methyl parathion. '
DDT 0.451 ppm DDE 0.253 ppm parathion 0.354 ppm Malathion ? 4.251 ppm Ten unidentified peaks, 5 of which match specific peaks in
Snow Creek.
STLCOPCB4040950
January Progress Report Page 6
*
Chromatographic analyses were done on a 10$ Dow-200 column with
a 5$ QF-1 polar column used as a back-up. In certain cases (Malathion
and Heptachlor Epoxide) interference was encountered and the identifications
are tentative. The parathion reported in the bluegill tissues (Hiway 93
Bridge) did not exactly match the standard and eluted from the clean-up
column early. However* clear separation was made with the parathion peak
in the two water samples reported. Several peaks extracted from Snow
Creek have similar retention times as pesticide standards. Certain peaks
in Snow Creek appear in bluegills caged downstream. Identification of
these peaks is beyond our present capabilities.
.
Conclusions
The data reported show no adverse environmental, conditions in
Choccolocco Creek or in the Anniston and Monsanto treatment facilities.
Snow Creek continues to be the only environment unfit for aquatic life,
however, there is no evidence that these undesirable effects alter
Choccolocco Creek at downstream sites. Several materials in Snow Creek
appear to accumulate in fishes caged downstream, but the biological .
properties of these compounds are unknown.
,
vie are accumulating background data for assessing possible
cholinesterase inhibition in caged fish. Survival of caged fish for
relatively long periods of time suggests that the factor or factors
causing fish ki11s in Choccolocco Creek may not be operative at' all
times, at least on a lethal level. When rains stop and stream-flow
decreases, we hope to study native fishes and determine possible
effects of cumulative long-term sublethal factors.
_
DSW 162376 /
STLCOPCB4040951