Document 4aOdL2x58D1YbwbGQDvnxwLqV

Occupational health factors in the United Kingdom by H.C. Lewinsohn and S. Holmes Asbestos dust, like the dust of many other basic industrial materials, can be a hazard to the health of people exposed to it in high concentrations. It is important that the risk should be clearly understood and that prop er controls be exercised over the mining, manufacture and industrial use of the material. An intensive study of this industrial hygiene problem has been carried out in the United Kingdom, where the most advanced government regula tions for its control have recently been introduced. The Asbestos Indus try Regulations were first introduced as long ago as 1931, and the pat tern of control that has subsequently developed, culminating in the Asbes-. tos Regulations 1969, has been an example to the rest of the world. This is because the British experience has shown that Regulations, where they have been properly applied, can be effective. Three diseases have been associated with exposure to asbestos fibres. Asbestosis, a type of pulmonary fibrosis, is the result of inhaling high concentrations of fibrous asbestos dust, usually over many years, and a dose-response relationship has been established, i. e. the concentration of dust and duration of exposure deter mine the length of the interval be tween first exposure and the first recognisable signs of this disease. In 1968 the British Occupational Hy giene Society published standards for chrysotile asbestos dust, on the basis of which concentrations of less than 2 fibres/ml, averaged over 3 months, would be expected to reduce the risk ofhaving early clinical signs of asbes tosis to less than 1 %, over a working lifetime of 50 years. Lung cancer has been associated with industrial asbestos exposure. From clinical observation over the past 40 years it would appear that this com plication is more likely to occur in the presence of severe asbestosis. Con trols which are successful in reducing the incidence of asbestosis should therefore reduce the associated risk of lung cancer. American epidemiol ogical work indicates the increased carcinogenic effects from smoking for asbestos workers. Asbestos in sulation workers in New York who smoke appear to- have a greater chance of dying from lung cancer than insulation workers who are nonsmokers exposed to the same levels of dust. Mesothelioma is a malignant tumour pf the pleura or peritoneum. Medical opinion is uncertain with regard to the dose-response relationship in mesothelioma, though it may be contracted as a result ofa much lower level of dosage than required for as bestosis. By no means all mesothe lioma cases seem to be associated with asbestos. Evidence in Britain sug gests that in about 10-15% of cases where the information has apparent ly been complete, no history of ex posure to asbestos has been recorded. A recent survey of cases reported in Canada, however, could only trace an association with asbestos in 20%. In those cases where asbestos ex posure has been authenticated, the period which elapses between first exposure and the onset of symptoms may be between 20 and 50 years. Asbestosis can result from exposure to all commercially utilised types of asbestos, but is confined to those joerson^ occupationally exposed to. substantial amounts of asbestos dust.In Britain the number of confirmed new cases was 134 in 1969. This disease is more prevalent in workers employed in the insulation industry and in shipyards where the Asbestos Industry Regulations 1931 did not apply. Where mesothelioma has been found to be associated with asbestos, the association has been mainly with crocidolite (blue asbestos). There.are far fewer cases who have been expossed exclusively to chrysotile (this may account for the different incidence in the UK and Canada, which is the world's largest chrysotile producer). There are at present no authenticated cases of exposure to amosite or anthophyllite. The number of confirm ed cases in Britain each year is about 60. Mesothelioma has attracted con siderable attention in recent years since it was first reported in associa tion with exposure to.N.W. Cape crocidolite in 1959. Some of these and some subsequent cases reported in London were of "neighbourhood" and domestic as opposed to occupa tional origin and it was assumed that these exposures had been to very slight concentrations of asbestos dust. Subsequent work, including dust measurements under conditions simulating some of the exposures described, has shown that these cases could well have been examples of considerable exposure. For example, in 1930 or earlier, a London woman brushing down her husband's dusty PLAINTIFFS || EXHIBIT 1 \rtv~Di05io PLAINTIFFS EXHIBIT SC-UK-MS-000198 could well have been exposed to a the diaphragm. There is no clinical or far.highcr concentration of dust than experimental evidence associating has been permitted since 1931 in the peritoneal mesothelioma with inges factory where he was employed. tion. In South Africa more cases have It is important to realise that the cases now conic to light in crocidolite min ofasbestosis and mesothelioma being ing areas of the N.W. Cape, but none reported today are the result of ex have been confirmed among people posure many years ago. There is a exposed in the crocidolite mining long latent period between first ex areas of the Transvaal. No authenti posure and the first recognisable cated cases have been found among symptoms. These cases date back to people exposed exclusively to amo- a time when controls were not as site, which is mined in the same areas effective as they arc today in Britain. of tbeTransvaal and which has physi The Asbestos Regulations 1969 are cal characteristics very similar to now applied not only to asbestos those of Transvaal crocidolite. This : factories, but to any occupation in difference may be because blue fibre which employees are exposed to con from the N.W. Cape is about 3 times centrations of asbestos dust liable to finer in diameter than Transvaal blue endanger their health. Approximate and therefore more likely to reach ly 40 to 50% of the cases being the lung depths and penetrate to the diagnosed now are the result of work pleura because of its sharp needle- in the insulation contracting indus like structure. Chrysotile fibres, try, which can involve very dusty jobs which are long and curly, are inter carried out in confined and badly cepted in the bifurcations of the ventilated spaces. Insulation work is broncheolar subdivisions and amo- subject to the Asbestos Regulations site and crocidolite from the Trans 1969, but was not adequately cover vaal do not penetrate as deeply be ed by the 1931 Regulations. cause of their larger fibre diameters. Acceptable hygiene standards are This is a possible explanation of the clearly set out in Technical Data means whereby certain fibres reach Note 13 issued by H.M. Factory the pleura, but does not explain how Inspectorate in the Dept, of Employ the peritoneum is involved, except ment. There are many occupations to .....-- >- juu.iauuvs provisions ot the Regulations would not apply, be cause they do not give rise to dust above the recommended levels. Ex amples of these might be the handling of asbestos-cement sheets, the fitting of most asbestos-based packings and jointings, and the bonding of brake and clutch linings. The range of such applications is being steadily extend ed as more products, particularly in asbestos textiles, are produced in dust-suppressed grades. Thus the essence of- the British ap proach is to impose controls where dust levels could be dangerous to operatives and to restrict the use of crocidolite to essential purposes. Controls work. It has been shown in the asbestos textile factory where we ourselves work that the implementa tion of measures for dust preven tion and personal protection since the early 1930s has reduced the in cidence of lung cancer among pur asbestos workers wholly employed since then to a level no higher than that expected for the population as a whole. Epidemiological studies at another British factory have shown no excess mortality among asbestos workers involved only in low or moderate exposure to asbestos dust. CU2.A - GrGlGCj IE.W . SC-UK-MS-000199