Document 4JQ4jjLb0767yYOrgXaMzgOEe

bc= S. F. 2-1'3/76 l -1.4 Tord Market ng Corporation ford Cusionie* <crvito Division Service Hrsoarch Center 1873 r Onhwootf Olvd Dearborn, Michigan 4Qi2| February 13, 1976 III. h. Kt ic! Virc F. c dei t Tr ipo .,icl 3 Company (-".00 Corh.an Cleveland, 0) lo 44139 Tcde Aon. l/o lia'-i r"viewed the January 6, 1976 Cliyt-on I'ivironmoi.tnl Connultaats test report cn Tempo'a uodel 75"D asbonloj duel vacuum clcanci. T'n re lulls w re very encouragirg with tho o**i *t samj lea woll below the 0.* A l ire .hold Unit values i'or airborne I owever, Clayton eeiiclu oil the ir report with tho following two loeommeniiations; 1. "'HI* ve' the vacuum clcanoi and it3 fO*' ,t*nn system nrpear to bo cilcc'ivi in filtering out onbostos fJl'i't- pi* .out in brake dust : *ir c'rear, it is r-r--rs'-nd"-! 1' 1 J-wther indostrir.l - *i > nluaxlons be conauctsd durhv ' hri 1130 of the vacuum elm 's in typical garage or rliop environments to confirm tho csnelr ions presented in tliia report." 2. "Tie rnclusionn presented in thia report no bnaod on the nssumption tl-it utility conttol of vacuum clcim-i t <" 1 /Ulor bag systems is rd^qu to. It is therefore reromraondi d H'-i a rlpli quality control juopr'm be develoDCil to insure tnnf mlnpi'io ocrfoi nnneo of the. vncuu'i cleaner coepnnmts, pai tlculm ly tho (litrai ion element:, is n-surod during lajgo scale production crciationa." The first recommondntion Implies ndditionnl in'n environment testing, win]: the second lnvol'T-, n production n imp]'m; '"it pi ngram. In - tew of the no-um ol this piojerl, wo would lllo- 'jniwmnii m of Tempo's intended oursu of action in regard to Clayton's recommendations. Thank yot for your usual flno eooporntlon. Clnroi oly 'j A. N. U|)dO[ 1' - EXPERT - 0058 SCF-FORD-1328