Document 44m49voEJ2VoOjMX0wpBwKyJG
from LER ITZ
P L U N K E R T i RHD BRUHINB
1 1 . 2 4 . 1 9 9 3 13: S8
JOSCfH k. kCftlTZ ,
YHP*fAP J. l U NRXRT * ANTHONY B, ORUKIHO* '
jCaHmA*tB*TeO.PuHttmfil rCx. MCBBAUBH KATULtCM U. THOMPSON
EDWAftO M. B O T H
p Banit
LlCKlTZ. Fj,U>`K E R T & BRCXT.VG. P.C.
STYQftNKYft AT I A W ONE CITY C E N T B t
SUITE 2001
ST. I.O U I5 . M IS S O U R I 63101
12(41 231'PdOO *AXi 0141 231-i>40
j,d.tmiri
fP* >iT|
* AlftO tlc<mko >M iiumo>
TELECOPIER COVER LETTER
TO: f e u 1 f l ' k m - / / __________
FROM; f (I /U> U'\_____________
DATE: I t f M k 2__________________
T I M E t I'.fi*
a.m. orrp^mX
RE: P ' ) h n } (\/jU C_______________________________________
PAGES i
, including cover letter
T E L E C O P Y SENT B Y :________i. U / W h ?_____________ _ (314) 231-9600
TELECOPIER NUMBER: ` (314)231-9480
COMMENTS:
FROM L E R I T Z , P LU N K E R T , AND B R U M IN 6
11.24.1993 13:59
P. 2
jORKRM l.leritx TH O M A E J. RlUWKERT*
ANTHONY R U M N O * J A H Il C L1R ITI
CHRlETOAHER E UCOHAUaH KATHLEEN M THOMASON
EDWARO M ROTH or e*UN>i
TjKKITK. P L U N K E K T tSi B r u n t n c i .j>o .
a t t o r n e y s at la w
o n e city c e n t r e S U IT E 2001
ST. LOUIS. MISSOURI 03101
1314 2 3 I 9 C OO FAX: 13141 231*0400
November 24, 1993
J D LERITE
it!>!
* * 1 . 0 uCMIO IN iLMNOK
HAND
Hon. Jean C. Hamilton
United States District Judge
United States Courthouse
1114 Market street
St. Louis, Missouri
63101
Re; William R.__Gaffey_ v, Peter <?, KPfltftque .and Environmental Research Foundation. No. 91-1938-C-7
Dear Judge Hamilton:
On Monday of this week I had delivered to you a Motion to Continue Trial Date in this case as well as an explanation that recent circumstances surrounding the case, including the disqualification of Evans & Dixon as defense counsel, and this firm's entry of appearance less than two weeks ago, have complicated the upcoming trial date as well as compliance with this Court's discovery order.
There is also pending a Motion to Disqualify the Coburn & Croft firm, who seeks to represent third party witnesses who are being produced for deposition this Saturday. It is with the greatest reluctance that I bring this to your attention on Thanksgiving eve, but we are confronted with conflicting pressures of the trial date, the discovery cut off, the ability of counsel to proceed, and disputes over outstanding discovery matters, all in a case that in my judgment presents profound issues concerning my client' survival as well as constitutional rights.
Any guidance you could provide would be greatly appreciated.
Very truly yours,
cc: All Counsel (by telecopy)
**>*END***