Document 44N76zxYvza8xv33xXXQjDQaa

Memorandum {or the Record of a Telephone Conversation late Tuesday Afternoon, August 19 1975 between: . Mr. Jeffrey Tannenbaum Wall Street Journal 22 Cortlnndt Street Hew York, MY 10007 212/285-5108 end , Dr. Raymond E, Shapiro . . Epidemiology Unit, UFFrl08 F^A f Wct'iM I evjttm I>-C. Mr. Tannenbaum had been referred to this office by Mr. John Wessel (ACC). Be had talked with Mr. Wessel about PCBs in foods, the subject having arisen from two articles in the New York Times, August 8, 1975 and August 17, 1975. The article in the Now York Times, by implication, stated that there were 16 FCB's related deaths in Japan from the Yusho tragedy. Mr. Tannenbaum asked if I was aware of this information and whether we had further details. I told him that to the best of our knowledge we did not have any data and would appreciate receiving anything he might obtain on this matter. , i I j Be then asked whether PCBs would be banned from foods since it is a carcinogen. Mr. Tannenbaum was aware of the PCBs review in Vol. 7 of the 1ARC reports wherein it was pointed out that it produced hepatocarcinoma in the mouse. He was also aware of the unpublished paper by Kimbrough and Squire showing I it produced hepatocarcinomas in rets. I pointed out to Mr. Tannenbaum I that the "ban" or the Dpla^ey AmenJraant^appiied only-to.lp^CIdldlClvesr--/-Environmental unavoidable contaminants which might get into foods call /I for scientific judgement as to permissable levels; i.e,, Delaney does not II Apply- . The next point raised, by Mr. Tannenbaum,was that wouldn't the recent findings of carcinogenicity with respect to PCBs lead to a tightening of the PCBs temporary tolerances, particularly with respect to PCBs in fish. Implicit, if not explicitly contained In this question is the following: The PCBs temporary tolerances were set before anything was known as to their carcinogenicity. One does not question your value judgements made at that time. Now, with the introduction of a new toxicological parameter; namesly, carcinogenicity - an irreversible effect, should there not be a lowering of these temporary tolerances taking into account this new data. The main interest was PSBs in fish. MONS 02878* i Page 2 X replied to Mr. Tannenbaum that the FDA vas studying oil aspects of PCBs toxicity in great depth, particularly in terms of the upcoming oaoerboard hearings. He was aware of these hearings and the Issues involved. With respect to this new data, 1 told him, our analysis must take into account a balancing of the following factors (1) maintaining proper and adequate protection of public health, (2) insuring the safety, and integrity of the nations food supply, and (3) not removing a major source of food from the market place unless public health considerations deemed it absolutely essential. I also pointed out to Mr. Tannenbaum that many of the sources of fish above guideline, mentioned in the EPA reports, did not enter into interstate commerce and were outside our legal mandate. However, we would supply backup materials to those needing it for local decision making. ' I promised to send Mr. Tannenbaum copies Of the Federal Register proposal and final order with respect to PCBs. CC: HFF-100 HFF-108 - 4 Mr. Coker, HFF-314 Mr. J. Vessel, KFC-13 Mr. B. Lake, HFF-302 Dr. H. Blumenthal, HFF-150 Mr. R. Ronk, HFF-330 Dr. S. Shibko, HFF-150 RES/slv 8/20/75 .. Raymond E. Shapiro, Ph.D. Epidemiology Unit, HFF-108 MONS 028785