Document 3qZqkpLM2JnEQJVB2DzB43Ny
To: 'arschna@erenj.com' <arschna@erenj.com>; 'twarmst@erenj.com'
<twarmst@erenj.com>; 'Beatty, Patrick' <PWBE@chevron.com>; 'biILd.broddle@usa.conoco.com'
<biILd.broddle@usa.conoco.com>; 'bbrody@bcm.tmc.edu' <bbrody@bcm.tmc.edu>; 'burnetdm@bp.com'
<burnetdm@bp.com>; 'Szcagen@shellus.com' <Szcagen@shellus.com>; 'RoythorC@bp.com'
<RoythorC@bp.com>; 'Tony.A.Clarke-Sturman@OPC.shell.com' <Tony.A.Clarke-Sturman@OPC.shell.com>;
'pmclegg@shellus.com' <pmclegg@shellus.com>; 'jdps@chevron.com' <jdps@chevron.com>; 'f-
judy.elledge@usa.conoco.com' d-judy.elledge@usa.conoco.com>; 'carol.a.fairbrother@exxonmobil.com'
<caroLa.fairbrother@exxonmobiLcom>; Susan Hahn <hahns@api.org>; 'myron.c.harrison@exxon.com'
<myron.c.harrison@exxon.com>; 'Heroldra@bp.com' <Heroldra@bp.com>; 'richard.irons@uchsc.edu'
<richard.irons@uchsc.edu>; 'masethwe@bp.com' <masethwe@bp.com>; 'Iynn.b.russo@exxon.com'
<lynn. b. russo@exxon.com>; Lorraine Twerdok <twerdokl @api.org>; 'ottowong@aoLcom'
<ottowong@aoLcom>; 'ncze@chevron.com' <ncze@chevron.com>
From:
George Woodall <Woodallg@api.org>
Cc:
Bcc:
Received Date:
2001-05-11 17:49: 15 GMT
Subject:
Conference call reminder; Revised minutes
Benzene Health Research Consortium Conference Call Monday, May 14th at 9:00 AM EDT. Call Title: Benzene Consortium Moderator: George Woodall Call-in Number: (703)736-7274 Confirmation Number: 5226922
The revised minutes from the last call on May 3rd are also attached. George M. Woodall, Ph.D. Senior Toxicologist American Petroleum Institute 1220 L Street, NW Washington, DC 20005
tel: (202) 682-8067 fax: (202) 682-8031 woodallg @api.org
Attachments: BenzeneConsortiumCall03May2001.doc
SHELL-MCCLURG-055113
DRAFT - May 11, 2001
Benzene Consortium Call May 3,2001
Participants:
Paula Podhasky Lynn Russo (Exxon) John Wagner Otto Wong Tom Armstrong
Lorraine Twerdok Patsy Clegg (Shell) Chris Raythorne (BP) Stuart Cagen (Shell) Patrick Beatty (Chevron)
Roll Call of Companies: Company
Exxon
BP
Chevron Shell Conoco
Commitment level No decision yet (will follow-up with Carol Fairbrother) Positive outlook, hopefully a decision next week Yes, letter should be out next week
Phillips
Marathon!Ashland
Issues to Consortium Fo..'I''''PYrvu
iti ding. The
suggestion was to have 15 shares or s ale back the proto
ever lower
funding is available.
The question was asked, when do we need to et 15 ares committed? No firm
date was fixed, but it was stated that it sho d be metime in the future to avoid
scaling back now then trying to add back c 1 ities if and when additional
funding partners are found. Action was for Patsy Clegg to identify the dollar
amount approved for Shell participation since a maximum of 14 shares was
anticipated.
Is there a potential for tiering the studies to address funding availability?
Interim Funding - An estimated $lOOK in additional funding (split on a share basis
among the interested companies) will be needed to cover 2 months (to the end of
June) until the consortium actually forms or not.
Potential Other Funding Sources
1
SHELL-MCCLURG-055114
DRAFT - May 11, 2001 Dow and Dupont may be approached - Dow originally said no Eastman Dupont Total/Final/Elf Equistar - showing some interest early on Leukemia Foundation funds $45M in research and may also be a candidate Robin Rorick of API has been investigating potential leads from searches on the internet. The results of those searches will be shared on the consortium web site soon.
Action Items: To continue funding for the University of Colorado staff for next 2 months (until the end of June) Companies should ha a lega review of the proposed project name - "Benzene Health Research
2 SHELL-MCCLURG-055115
To: From:
Cc: Bcc: Received Date: Subject:
Sullivan, Nancy NE SCC-CBAR <nesullivan@SheII.Com> Clegg, Patsy PM SCC <lO=SHELLlOU=MSXSCC/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=PH197432> Cagen, Stuart SZ SCC <szcagen@Shell.Com>
2001-05-2319:50:45 GMT RE: Shanghai Study
Nancy,
Attached is a file with an Aromatics Tox Budget Forecast for 2001-2006.
The Benzene Health Research Program $$ are based on Shell's commitment of $3MM and the agreed funding formula of 30%, 25%, 15%, 15%, and 15% over five years. The numbers are a little strange because it is expected that we would be invoiced 50% of the 1st year's 30% in 2001, etc. I discussed this approach with both Pat Beatty, Chevron, who has been one of the leads, and George Woodall, API staff.
The VCCEP numbers are based on an estimated 150K for the next 18 months being divided by 8 companies (still no firm commitments - decision due June 12.) Then an estimated $3MM project for Tiers 2 and 3 over the next several years.
I will be confirming these estimates with Stuart and finalizing the tax budget for 2002 this week.
Patsy
Aromatics Tox
Budget - 2001 - ...
From: Sent:
----Original Message----Sullivan, Nancy NE SCC-CBAR Tuesday, May 22, 2001 3:03 PM
To: Subject:
Clegg, Patsy PM SCC Shanghai Study
Patsy, I hope to speak with Fran/Jerry next week and confirm approval to spend $$ on this project. Given the intense focus we now have on costs and the fact this hasn't been budgeted, I just want to make sure they still give us the go ahead and we include in a budget. Do you have the latest estimate of what Shell would expect to pay by year (I know we would incur a higher % early on)? Thanks, Nancy
Nancy E. Sullivan Vice President Aromatics/Phenol OSP 1966 (713) 241-3084 (0) (713) 907-8470 (M) e-mail:nesullivan@shellus.com
SHELL-MCCLURG-055116
Attachments: Aromatics Tox Budget - 2001 - 2006 Forecast.xls
SHELL-MCCLURG-055117