Document 3exwwd1b1GMpLVyOL2JvLvNBy
AR226-3340 ^0^1^
E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOUKi) & COMPANY INC.
REPORT NO: / GL-2001-42
TITLE:
Aquatic Toxicity and Solubility of
COPY NO.
5
Fliinrotelomer Intermediate
AUTHOR: i,Roland C. Hall, Jr. ^
'~~
p"
CONTRmUTORS: JThomas V. Robertson, Olver Laboratories
DISTRIBUTION:
ABSTRACT ONLY
Does not contain TSCA CBI
^ GL-2001-42 ,
Y
-/
Report Number Issued
^GL-2001-42J
December 5. 2001
Aquatic Toxicity and Solubility of
uorotelomer Intermediate
Report Written By Period Covered Research Notebooks Work Supervised By
Roland C Hall. Jr J
December 2000 to May 2001
NA
"'
J F
--\
Kmec j
Abstract
This report documents a stud^oneJj^Dlver Labatones to determine the the aiqsuoantiec ~~
of^|B^|BB||^luorotelonrcrIntennediate(^'hich mjBB||BUP^> toxicity and solubility
The study was conducted in
component of the spin agent to be used
to conduct a test of the new spin agent in
to obtain necessary environmental permits
subsequently canceled, however,
^BBBBp^01 order,
P^"1 ^ne test ln ^ P1!01 P^"1 was
theinfonnaS&n in this report was forwarded to the Line 3 organization to assist in
meeting their environmental requirements'"]
'"'
^^^^^j| "~
ofUBBBBBII^Flouorotelomer
Olver
Laboratories
determined that the solubility be the order of 6 mg/L
at
standard
temperature
and
pressure
Intermediate appeared to in
acute toxicity at concentration near the apparent
Their screening tests also indicated no
-
maximum solubility of 5 mg/L
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
.-^\ GL-2001-42 i
confidential information and each holder is responsible for its
This
report
contains When no
longer
needed,
please
destroy
or
dispose
of
in
conformance the approval
safekeeping.
with MP guidelines.
No part of this report may be reproduced without
of thqilHK^echnical Manager.
Ip^^^^ij
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction Objectives Summary and Conclusions
i
Patent Situation
Program Publication Status Acknowledgement Signature(s) Appendixes
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBt
f~GL-2001-42 I
INTRODUCTION
made to evaluate the spin agent to be used oj
Ilnn ^la^te^2f0W00lyapd1e^ci0si1onplwanats Thetrsapnins-a1g,2e,nDtictohlbperoteesthtevdlevne''aT^n loirmderBtoHo--bta9in !
Fluorotelonier'Tjitermediateand
t-he^MMMpilotplant, information was^---
environmental approval to run the tests in
J^rherewasno pubiished"o3ta available
needed
on
the
aquatic to\icity ofthespm agent
ofBB(tttBBB|FluoroteIomerIntermediate,
therefore
a
study
was
on aquatic toxicity
Laboratories to determine the solubility in water and the ~"~
commissioned with CHver
toxicityJThetest in
the
pilot
plant
was
subsequently
canceled,
however, the meeting
rranqfuoartmication in this report was forwarded to the Line 3 organization to assist in ^
| their environmental requirements
OBJECTIVE
,
o i f The
purpose
of
this
ot
the
study
was
to
determine
the
toxicity of 6
mg/L
to
Fluorotelomer Intermediate at a maximum concentration in water
Cenodaphma and fathead minnows (.Pimephales promelas)
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
tests indicated no acute toxicity at concentrations near the
theiUH^ The initial screening
6 mg/L In an effort to determine
apparent maximum solubility of and chronic toxicity, acute and. chrprug testing was
concentrations that results in acute
usingg(KlQamendewdith
conducted usingofamn eetxhpaannodletdo tiensctresaosluetisoonlusbeirliietys prTehpeareredsult of these (tPeismtsepinhdailceasted that and fathead minnows
smalt amounts
iBHBQwas not acutely toxic to Cenodaphma
solubility limits The 48-hour
promelal)at concentrations
approaching methanol-aided was greater than 500
mg/L.
The no
LC5o
values
for
Cenodaphma
and fathead minnows
(NOEC) for the Three-Brood
Cenodaphnia
Survival
and
observed effect concentration 100 ma/L while the NOEC for the 7-Day Fathead Mmnow
Reproduction chronic test was Growth chronic test was 500 mg/L
These results .suggest that there should
^^^Ulj11- Survival and
toxicity due to the presence
the maximum
be no direct acute or chronic
apparent solubility in water of 6 mg/L
PATENT SITUATION
At the present time we have no plans to tile for a patent
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CB!
GL-2001-42 \
PROGRAM
No additional testing is planned at this time
PUBLICATION STATUS
At the present time \ve have no plans to publish the data contained in this report
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Thanks to Tom Robertson and Olver Labortones, Incorporated for their contributions to
this study and report.
SIGNATURE(S)
S.n!zed.Do..n.>c.nt.lnTSCACBI
Company
GL-2001-42
APPENDIX
Appendix A Memo from R Lawrence Hoffman, VicePresidenl., Olver Laboratories to
CThomasV. RobertsonjdaleMday 4, 2001 subject |HMBSolubi]ity and Toxicity
Deterrmnation Program, Job Number 60175
*as"
B "Delermi nation of solubility and aquatic loxicity of DuPont Product ^luorotelomer Intermediate for E E DuPont De Nemours and Company by R ^awrenc'e Hoffman dated May 3. 2001
Company Sanitized. Does iwl cwla'n TSCA CB1
^ ^ ^s \ v>^^s
/"V WpD
LABORATORIES
Consulting Engineers . Environmental Laboratories 11 "16 South Main Street Blacksburg. Virginia 24060
May 4, 2001
Mr Thomas V. Robertson)
'Development Associate Environmental Affairs E.I du Pontde Nemours and Company, Inc
PO Box 27001 Richmond, VA 23261
Re (fffiolubility and Toxicrty ^Determination Program, Job Number 60175
Dear Tom
Enclosed for your review and use are three (31copies of the report which
describes the performance and results of thefiHJ5olubility and Toxicity
Determination program performed by Olver Laboratories Incorporated for E I du Pont de Nemours and Company, Incorporated. This program was performed to support evaluations of the potential for the use of this product by examining its potential effects on wastewater toxicity The program, as described in our December 14, 2000 proposal, consisted of an initial determination of solubility in water and subsequent determinations of acute and chronic toxicity to two common freshwater test organisms As for the standard compliance monitoring performed by Olver Laboratories for DuPont, the toxicrty testing component of this program is reported in a GLP format
As indicated on the Material Safety Data Sheet provided with the sample, the material appeared to be only slightly soluble in water As described in the,,report, the solubility of the material in water appeared to be in the order of 6 mg/L at standard temperature and pressure. The solubility in water appeared to increase tojevels of
500 mg/L to 1000 mg/L by adding a small amount of methanol to the|ttB|Tpnoj,to_ addition to water For the reasons referenced in the report, the analysis of the_p1"^ solutions provided inconsistent results and could not be used to confirm the|
concentrations used in the toxicity evaluation component of this program.
Blacksburg, VA (540) 552-6974
Company Sanded. Does not contain T8CA CBI
Mr Thomas V. Robertson "May 4, 2001
Page 2
The initial screening tests indicated no acute toxicrty at concentration near the
apparent maximum solubility of 6 mg/L. In an effort to determine the^Oyoncentra-
tions that results in acute and chronic toxicity, acute andchronic testing was conducted
using an expanded test solution series prepared usingflBBBamendedwith small
amounts of methanoi to increase solubility. The results oftnese tests indicated that
iBjRvas not acutely toxic to Ceriodaphma and fathead minnows {Pimephales
prometas) at concentrations approaching methanol-aided solubility limits. The 48-hour LCgo values for Ceriodaphnia and fathead minnows was greater than 500 mg/L. The no observed effect concentration (NOEC) for the Three-Brood Ceriodaphnia Survival and Reproduction chronic test was 100 mg/L while the NOEC for the 7-Day Fathead Minnow Survival and Growth chronic test was 500 mg/L These results suggest that
there should be no direct acute or chronic toxicty due to the presence oflMR81 the
maximum apparent solubility in water of 6 mg/L
' I look forward to the opportunity to discuss this with you in more detail and TO answer any questions that you may have As always, please do not hesitate to contact me or David Griffiths
Sincerely,
RLH/egl
<
O'(XLUU?MCC
R Lawrence Hoffman Vice President
Enclosures cc: David W Griffiths, Ph.D., President, Olver Laboratories Incorporated
Company Sanitized. Dn^ ^ cnnf^n TSCA CBI
STUDY TITLE
DETERMINATIONS SOLUBILITY AND AQUATIC TOXICITY OF
DuPONT PRODUCT -ffffSHffLUOROTELOMER INTERMEDIATE
FOR E. 1. DU FONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
DATA REQUIREMENTS DuPONT CONTRACT ORDER NUMBER
AUTHOR R. LAWRENCE HOFFMAN STUDY COMPLETED ON
May 3, 2001 PERFORMING LABORATORY OLVER LABORATORIES INCORPORATED ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
AND CONSULTANTS 1116 SOUTH MAIN STREET BLACKSBURG, VIRGINIA 24060
for
E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPAN'
OLVER LABORATORIES INCORPORATED JOB NUMBER
60-? 75
'Connwv R^W,^ ,,.,,,,, ,,,., ,.,,....,,,, TQ^ pg,
OLVER
LABORATORIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page Number
REPORT APPROVAL RECORD .
. .
' -
. . . . . . QUALITY ASSURANCE STATEMENT
..
-
"
-
...... ... ......... ..... .... 1
GENERAL INFORMATION
.
2
PROJECT PERSONNEL .
..... ........ .... 3
......... SUMMARY ... ..... . .
.
.
.
.
-
4
............... INTRODUCTION .... .....
METHODS AND MATERIALS ...
........ 1 0 fi----S9OLUBIUTY DETERMINATION ......
... 4
.
......
.
-
4
....
.
.
.
2 0 JB|l|^QUATlTCOXICITY DETERMINATION .... ..... 4
2.1 TEST ORGANISMS .
.4
... ............ 2.2 TEST SUBSTANCE
.,.:..................... 2.3 DILUTION WATER
.......... ...... ... 2.4 JOXICTTY TEST PROCEDURES .
....... ........ ..... 2.4.1 GENERAL PROCEDURES
.
.
2.4.2 TOXICITY RANGE-FINDING TESTS
........ ............. ...... 2.4.3 ACUTE TOXICITY TESTING
24.4 CHRONIC TOXICITY TESTING
-
-
....
. ......... .
.
.
.... .. ..
5
-
6
6
.68
.
8 9
2.5 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS .
. . . . . . . . RESULTS
10
... .
.
.
.
.11
................... ............. 1.0 ||1|SOLUBILITYDETERMINATION .......... ...
f
--%
2.0 |Bt|TOXlCITY DETERMINATION
.... .... 2.1 TOXICITY RANGE-FINDING .
.
.
. ....
........ 2.2 ACUTE TOXICITY TESTING
..... .... ........... 2.3 CHRONIC TOXICITY TESTING
.
.
...
11
..... .
12
......."-1122 ... 14
.
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CB1
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Table 2 Table 3
Table 4
Toxicity Range-Finding Data Summary
Acute Toxicity Data Summary . ...
....... 13
.
-
15
Chronic Toxicity Data Summary - Comparison to Standard
... ............ Controls
.
..
. 16
Chronic Toxicity Data Summary - Comparison to Methanol-
..... ...... Spiked Controls
....
APPENDICES
17
.....
. . . . . Appendix 1 Material Safety Data Sheet .
.
.
...
18
Appendix 2 yl^f, Solubility Determination - Test Protocol . . ...
25
Appendix 3 f-^^M solubility Determination - Analytical Data .
iflU ... . . . . . Appendix 4 Toxicity Range-Finding Test Data
.
.
27
3 2 .
.
Appendix 5 Appendix 6 Appendix 7
Acute Toxicity Test Data
39
... ............... Chronic Toxicity Test Data - Pimephales promelas
45
. . . . . Chronic Toxicity Test Data - Cenodaphnia dubia . . . . 67
Appendix 8 Appendix 9 Appendix 10 Appendix 11
Acute Reference Toxicity Test Data
. . . . . .93 Chronic Reference Toxicity Test Data . . . . . . . . Dilution Water Quality Analyses Data . . ..
.
..101
113
.... .... .
Chemical Analyses of Brine Shrimp and YCT Food Mixtures 122
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
Report Prepared by:
^^jo^ ^}J^\^1^L^_______^l^fol
Susan Mirlohl
Date
Bioassay Laboratory Manager
Reviewed and Approved for Issue by
Vice President and Study Director
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
OLVER
LABORATORIES
QUALITY ASSURANCE STATEMENT
Quality Assurance Statement for final report entitled "Determination of Solubility and
Aquatic Toxicity of DuPont Producj-t--f^H^|M^ RF"Iu^ orotelomer intermediate for E I du Pont
EB^^^^^^SI
de Nemours and Company"
Audits for the study were conducted on the dates listed below:
Items Audited Sample Receipt Range-Finding Test Initiation Range-Finding Test Termination Acute Test Initiation Acute Test Termination Chronic Test Initiation ChTonic Test Renewal Chronic Test Termination
Audit Dates 1/11/01 1/25/01:2/01/01 1/27/01; 2/03/01 2/14/01 2/16/01 2/13/01; 2/20/01 2/14/01; 2/21/01 2/20/01; 2/27/01
Date findings reported to management and study director 2/27/01 The information provided within this report was generated in accordance with Good Laboratory Practice Regulations and Protocols. A final review of all data and records indicate the report submitted is an accurate reflection of the study conducted;
l Reported by:
\
f/Lj^--^ "
^/3/o/
F^ri d. BjoltinghouseDate
(Uuahfy Assurance Auditor, Olver Laboratories
Company Sanitized. Drifts ^t c'wt^n TSCA CB1
OLVER
LABORATORIES
Matenal Tested:
GENERAL INFORMATION
Olver Sample Designation:
Sponsor:
Study Initiated; Completed:
-Experimental Start; End: .
Location of Onginal Raw Data and Final Report:
1/12/01:5/03/01
1/25/01.2/27/01
Olver Laboratones Incorporated 1116 South Main Street Blacksburg, Virginia 24060
Page 1
60175
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBi
OLVER
LABORATORIES
PROJECT PERSONNEL
The study director of this project for E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company was
| \""R. Lawrence Hoffman.
^ 3 The following Olver Laboratories personnel assisted with the various phases of thejJUj
^ ^ aquatic toxicity determination study
TITLE
INITIALS
Susan Mirlohi Stacey Boyles Sheryl Newton
Laura Dunham Fran Boltinghouse
Bioassay Laboratory Manager Biological Technician Biological Technician Biological Technician Quality Assurance Officer
$rq
5L&
5P^
Lrvu? ^<->.
Page 2
60175
Company Sanitized. Does nol contain TSCA CBI
OLVER
LABORATORIES
DETERMINATION OF SOLUBILITY AND AQUATIC TOXICITY OF DuPONT
PRODUCT'.BBBBUhfcfLUOROTELOMEINRTERMEDIATE
SUMMARY
Solubility andaguatic toxicity determination studies were performed for the DuPont
l l t w o product,
facilitate projections and assessments of the potential for toxicity in
wastewater that "may contain this material. The solubility determination was performed
using a procedure developed by Olver Laboratories based on the substance information
contained on the Matenal Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) provided by DuPont.JBBjpolubility
in water wasestjmated by establishing a calibration curve for GC/MS analysis. The
solubility ofjHfin water was determined to be on the order of 6 mg/L. However, when
of|l|Hl| introduced as a methanolic solution, it proved possible to produce what appeared to be
homogenous aqueous solutions containing as much as 1,000 mg/L
It is believed
that these are not true solutions, but rather dispersions or micellar solutions
i f The a&ute and chronic toxicity of
to Ceriodaphnia dubia and fathead minnows
(Pimephales promelas) was assessed utilizing EPA/600/4-90/027F and EPA/60 0/4-91/002
methods^ Tqxjcity testing consisted of initial range-finding tests which included a wide
range off^concentrations to establish a general level of toxicity for acute and chronic
testing using Ceriodaphnia dubia and fathead minnows. Toxicity range-finding tests were
followed by 48-hour static acute Ceriodaphnia and fathead minnow tests, a three-brood
chronic Cenodaphma dubia test, and a 7-day chronic static renewal fathead minnow test
of||||||| The concentratjonseries used in the toxicity range^nding tests ranged from 0.01 to
1,000 mg/L
For acute toxicity testing,^||||||concentratiornansged from 5 to
200 mg/L, white chronic testing included concentrations which ranged from 5 to 500 mg/L
Estimated toxicity endpoints (LC5o and NOEC values) were found to be as follows.
Toxicity Test Type
Toxicity End-points
Ceriodaphnia Acute Test
Fathead Minnow Acute Test
Ceriodaphnia Chronic Test - Survival Ceriodaphnia Chronic Test - Reproduction Fathead Minnow Chronic Test - Survival Fathead Minnow Chronic Test - Growth
LCgo >500 mg/L (100% survival at 500 LCgo >500 mg/L (100% survival at 500
NOEC= 100 mg/L NOEC =100 mg/L NOEC = 500 mg/L NOEC = 500 mg/L
mg/L) mg/L)
Page3
60175
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
INTRODUCTION
Solubility determination and aquatic toxicity testing for the DuPont product^B^^^^--H--K--"^'M61"6
performedbYOIverUiboratQnes Incorporated for the E.I. du Pont de fTemours and
CornpanylBlBBBIBIyroJamnuary 12^2001 to February 27, 2001. The purpose of
o^ll|n this study ^as to detergi'ffitlhe solubility
water and to determine the acute and
ofjifto chronic toxicity
representative freshwater organisms. The toxicity o^Hl^a5
assessed through determination of median lethal concentration (LC5o) values'for acute
testing and no observed effect concentration (NOEC) values for chronic testing, using
Ceriodaphnia and fathead minnows.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
1.0 --yI^^--^B--uSSoSloulubbililiittyy Determination
^^*3
the1abenfllU|UB|BUHBmi All testing was performed using a sample ofJUi provided by DuPont. The sample wa;
contained in a 3.63 kg/8 Ib can bearing Solubility tests were performed according to the test protocol that is provided in Appendix 2.
mi*1 jaa,
2.0 Jgf^llAAqquuaatic Toxicity Determination t^^^^^^Ol?!?'
The toxicity tests were conducted according to "Methods for Measunng the Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and Marine Organisms", EPA/600/4-90/027F and "Short-Term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms", EPA/600/4-91/002
The tox-icity testing component of this study was conducted following Good Laboratory Practice general testing and reporting guidelines and the final report was reviewed by the Olver Laboratories Quality Assurance Unit. Copies of the report and original raw data will be maintained by Olver Laboratories. The original signed report and raw data will be
archived at Olver Laboratories Incorporated.
2.1 Test Organisms
Ceriodaphnia dubia and fathead minnows, originally obtained from the U.S. EPA and subsequently cultured at Olver Laboratories, were used for acute and chronic testing. Fathead minnow and Ceriodaphnia cultures were maintained in EPA moderately hard water and the cultunng records indicated that the test organisms were in satisfactory health at test initiation. Cenodaphnia cultures were fed a YCT (yeast-cerophyll-trout chow) and
algae (Selanastrum capncomutum) food mixture prepared at Olver Laboratories. Fathead
minnow cultures were fed brine shnmp nauplii (Artemia sp. eggs obtainedjrom "Ocean
Page 4
B0175
CompanySanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBJ
Star International Inc.", Snowville, VT, Lot No. 4400). Test organisms were fed for at least two ho'urs prior to use in testing.
Larval fathead minnows used in the chronic testing (Olver Culture No. 1810) were 1-24 hours old at test initiation and the control organisms had an average dry weight of 0 429 mg at test completion. The biological loading factor in the controls was 0.02 g/L. Test organisms were fed 0.1 mL of a concentrated suspension of newly hatched (less than 24 hours old) bnne shrimp nauplii (approximately 700 to 1000 nauplii) 2-3 times daily during testing Larval fathead minnows used in the acute testing (Olver Culture No 1809) were 3 days old at test initiation. The biological loading factor in the controls was 0 05 g/L with an average weight (not dried) of 2.4 mg at test completion.
The Cenodaphnia dubia used in the chronic test were obtained from Olver Laboratories cultures produced from EPA-supplied stock. Cenodaphnia used in the chronic testing (Olver Culture Nos. 1-30) were less than 24 hours old, and all within 8 hours of the same age, at test initiation, and the control organisms had an average reproduction of 25.9 (per surviving female) at test completion. Test organisms were fed 0.1 mL of YCT and 0 1 mL of a concentrated suspension of algae (approximately 3.1 x 107 cells) once daily at test solution renewal time. Cenodaphnia used in acute toxicity testing were less than 24 hours old at test initiation and they were not fed dunng testing.
The brine shrimp and YCT used in feeding were tested to show that concentrations of metals, pesticides, and PCBs remained within acceptable limits No chemicals were present in the bnne shrimp that made them unsuitable for use as a food source in aquatic toxicity tests. Data for these analyses are included in Appendix 11
Monthly reference tests (Append ices 8 and 9) were performed to ensure that test organism sensitivities and health were within acceptable limits. A sodium chloride reference toxicant (EM Science; CAS #7647-14-5) was used and the results showed fathead minnow and Cenodaphnia sensitivities to be comparable to ranges previously established at Olver
Laboratories.
2.2 Test Substance
A concentrated sample ofjB^|^;o! ntained in aone-gallon sealecLjpetal container was
provided to Olver Laboratonesby the DuPont|||HI----tflH^ac;lity The MSDS provided with the sample identified the material aJj^BPuoruteiomer Intermediate with
the following composition:
Page 5
60175
'Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBl
Based on the results of the|m|solubility determination, various concentrations of
were prepared for use in acute and chronic toxicity testing. The solubility level foij
in water was estimated at 6 mg/L, therefore, the theoretical concentrations o^pByjsed
in initial range-finding toxicity tests were selected at and below the 5 mo/Lsolubility level
Since no toxicity was observed at this level, higher concentrations ofJUpft/ere prepared
for use in the acute and chrome toxicity testing. These rangedfrom 5 to 500 mg/L To
enhance the solubility of||B|in preparing test solutionslB^Jl/vasinitially dissolved in
methanol (Burdick & Jackson, High Purity Methanol, CAS #67-56-1) prior to being mixed
theffH in dilution water Test solution preparation for the range-finding, acute and chronic testing
is described in Section 2.42 through 2.4.4. In all cases, preparations of
standards and test solutions was performed in a manner to minimize loss by volatization to the extent practical.
/
2.3 Dilution Water
The dilution water used for cultunng, toxicity testing, andjUylest solution preparation
was moderately-hard synthetic freshwater prepared using EPA guidelines (EPA/600/490/027F and EPA 600/4-91/002) This dilution water was aerated prior to testing with oilfree compressed air. pH ranged from 7.7 to 8.0, conductivity ranged from 300 336 //mhos/cm, alkalinity ranged from 60 to 64 mg/L, and hardness ranged from 84 to 100 mg/L. Annual dilution water quality analyses data are provided in Appendix 10,
2.4 Toxicity Test Procedures
2.4 1 General Procedures
The acute and chronic toxicity tests were performed at 25C 1C by placing the test chambers in a constant temperature water bath. Test organisms were exposed to ambient laboratory light (50-100 foot candles, measured at water surface) for a 16-hour day/8-hour night photoperiod. Transitional lighting (30 minutes, 30-40 foot candles) was included at the beginning and end of the 16-hour light period
For the Cenodaphnia dubia acute toxicity tests, plastic beakers filled with 25 mL of test solution were used. For the fathead minnow acute toxicity tests, 600^ mL glass beakers filled with 500 mL of test solution were used. Beaker positions were randomized in the water bath using random numbers. Test organisms were pooled
Page 6
60175
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCACB1
and placed (five at a time) into each test solution in a random order. Test organisms were less than 24 hours old for the Ceriodaphnia acute tests and within 1 to 14 days old and within 24 hours of age for the fathead minnow acute tests.
Routine chemical analyses were conducted. Alkalinity and hardness were
measured in the control and highesimptest concentrations at test initiation.
Conductivity, was measured in all test concentrations at test initiation and termination. Dissolved oxygen, pH, and temperature were measured daily in one replicate per effluent concentration. All chemical analyses were conducted as per the EPA document "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes" (EPA 600/4-79-020) or APHA, "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater", 18th Edition. Dissolved oxygen was determined by electrode EPA Method 360.1.
PASAMETER PH
Temperature Dissolved Oxygen
Conductivity Alkalinity Hardness
TEST METHOD EPA 150 1 EPA170 1 EPA 360 1 EPA 120 1 EPA 3101 EPA 130 2
TEST SOLUTIONS ANALYZED
All All All All Control and Highest Concentration Control and Highest Concentration
FREQUENCY Daily
Daily Daily Beginning/End Beginning Beginning
For the Ceriodaphnia chronic test, 30 mL plastic beakers filled with 15 mL of test solution were used. Beaker positions were randomized in a holding tray using random numbers. One Ceriodaphnia neonate (20-24 hours old) was placed in each of ten replicate test chambers per test solution using the assigned positions All test chambers, contained in their holding trays, were placed in the water bath. The number of surviving Ceriodaphnia in each test concentration was determined prior to test solution renewal. Dead Ceriodaphnia were discarded. Test solutions were
^Wv^^ ___ewed daily by transferring each of the original Ceriodaphnia into freshly prepared solutions. The number of Ceriodaphnia neonates, reproduced by the adult female Ceriodaphnia in each replicate test chamber, was counted and recorded at each daily test solution renewal time
In the chronic test, Ceriodaphnia were fed 0.1 mL of a concentrated suspension (approximately 3.1 x 107 cells) of algae and 0.1 mLofYCTfood mixture daily, attest solution renewal time. Ceriodaphnia were exposed to ambient laboratory light (50-
Page 7
60175
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
100 foot candles, measured at water surface) for a 16-hour day/8-hour night photopenod with transitional lighting Transitional lighting (30 minutes, 30-40 foot candles) was included at the beginning and end of the 16-hour light period. Temperature was maintained at 25C 1C by placing the test chambers in a constant temperature water bath.
For the fathead minnow chronic test, beakers (glass; 600 mL) filled with 250 ml_ of test solution were used. Ten fathead minnow larvae, 1-20 hours old, were placed in each of four replicate test chambers per test solution using random numbers All test chambers were positioned in the water bath using randomization techniques. The number of surviving larvae in each chamber was determined prior to test solution renewal. Dead larvae were discarded. Test solutions were renewed daily by siphoning approximately 80% of the test solution out ofthe^ chamber The
original test volume was restored by adding freshly preparedj|BI(s|olutions to the
test chambers.
2.4.2 Toxicity Range-Finding Tests
o f l j f The initial phase of testing consistedofa series of 48-hour range-finding tests to
determine the general toxicity of|B|l|bver a wide range of test concentrations
Targeted test solutions, ranged from 0.01 mg/L to 1,000 mg/L
Based on
the results ofthelB|Bpolubility determination, an initial concentration series was
oqU|in selected to perform the toxicity range-finding tests. Since the solubility
water was estimated at 6 mg/L, the initial toxicity range-finding tests were performed
using a dilution series consisting of control, 0.01 mg/L, 0.1 mg/L, 1 mg/L, and
jllH 5 mg/L of
Since no evidence of toxicity was observed at these levels, tne^
nig/L||U dilution series was expanded to include targeted 100 mg/LtoU)00 concentrations. To enhance the solubility oi^fffin water, Ulfused to prepare
test concentrations greater than 6 mg/L was initially mixed with 500 ,uL of reagent-
grade methanol; this mixture was then added to moderately hard water to prepare
the test solutions,
2.4.3 Acute Toxicrtv Testing
The second phase of testing involved the performance of 48-hour static acute Cenodaphnia dubia and fathead minnow tests. Based on the results of the toxicity range-finding tests, a concentration seges consisting of control, 200 rng/L^
300 mg/L, 400 mg/L, and 500 mg/L o||fl|||vas used. The highest targetedply
concentration used in testing was at 500 mg/L since, above 500 mg/L.^IBBJipniodt
appear to reman in solution. At concentrations greater than 500 mg/L small
droplets o^HBI^ere observed adhenng to the glassware used to prepare the test
solutions. Anadditional control solution consisting of 500 pL methanol/L of dilution water was included in testing to identify any potential toxicity associated with the presence of methanol in solution. Based on the available toxicity data on methanol
Page 8
60175
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
(EPA documents: EPA-600/6-91/005 and EPA/600/6-91/003), the concentration of methanol in the test solutions (0 05%) was well below the expected toxic levels (i.e., 2% to 5% for acute toxicity and 0 3% to 0 5% for chronic toxicity)
test solutions were prepared by first dissolving the pre-measured volume of
concentrate in 500 ^Lofmfithanol prior to mixing in the dilution water The
measured concentrations owHR|n test solutions were based on a specific gravity
of 1.4 as noted on the matenaLgafetY data sheet provided with the sample The
Hlfest acute test dilution series and
below.
solution preparations are summarized
Control Control with Methanol
200 300 400 500
None None
142^L
213 p.L 284 ,uL 355 iiL
2.4.4 Chronic Toxicity Testing
The third phase of testing involved the performance of the static renewal Ceriodaphnia dubia and fathead minnow tests. Based on the results of the acute toxicity tests, a dilution senes consisting ofcontrol, 5 mg/L, 10 mg/L, 25 mg/L, 50
mg/L, 100 mg/L, and 500 mg/L of targeted(^(y:oncentrationwsere used for the
chronic testing An additional control solution consisting of 500 pL of methanol/L of dilution water was included in testing to serve as a second control for determinations of potential toxicity associated with the presence^" methanol in test
solutions Methanol was used as a solvent medium foiHllfprior to mixing of ^pBywrthdilution water and preparation of test solutions^^^
Test solutions were prepared at test initiation and daily chronic test solution
f^tock renewals. A 100 mg/L stock soh^o\^1^flfwas usedto prepare the 5 mg/L,
10 mg/L, 25 mg/L, and 50 mg/L|H|^est solutions,
solutions were
measured volumetrically, dissolved in 500 {A- of puremethanol, and added to
premeasured volumes of dilution water. The solutions were gently mixed in a
separatory funnel prior to use.
Page 9
60175
Company Sanded. Does not contain TSCA CBI
Test Concentration (mg/l Control
Control with Methanol
5
10 25 50 100 500
>1000 mL dilution water
None
None
5 mL of 100 mg/L
solution
10ml-of100mg/L< 25mLof100mg/L< 50 mL of 100 mg/lJ
solution (solution solution
71 ^L 355 {A.
2.5 Statistical Analysis
*
In light of the analytical difficulties presented^ chronic test data were based on targeted
all statistical analyses of acute and test concentrations.
Insufficient mortalities occurred in the acute toxicity tests to calculate an LC^. Mortality per test concentration was reported, and the LCgg values were approximated based on the highest test solution used.
Statistical analysis procedures described in EPA/600/4-91/002 were used with Toxstat Version 3.5 to perform statistical analyses for the Ceiiodaphnia and fathead minnow
chronic tests- For the Cenodaphnia chronic test, survival was analyzed first using Fisher's Exact Test. Normality of distnbution and homogeneity of vanance for the reproduction data were next checked with the Shapiro Wilk's or Chi-Square Tests and Bartlett's Test, respectively. ANOVA and Dunnett's Test or Steel's Many-One Rank Test were used to evaluate reproduction. Any Ceriodaphnia test replicates identified as males were excluded from the reproduction data analyses as per EPA guidelines.
For the fathead minnow chronic test, data were transformed using the arc sine [square root (y)] transformation. Survival was analyzed first Normality of distnbution and homogeneity
of variance were next checked with Shapiro-Wilks and Bartlett's Test, respectively ANOVA and Dunnett's Test or Steel's Many-One Rank Test were used to evaluate mortality and growth. If any test concentrations showed statistically significant mortalities,
they were excluded from the growth data analyses For statistical analyses of growth data, average growth of the organisms was based on the onginal number of larvae, as per EPA method guidelines.
Page 10
6Q175
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CB1
Two sets of data analyses were performedforthe chronic toxicity tests. Test organism
survival and reproduction or growth in theflB^est solutions were statistically compared
to both the standard control group (with no added methanol) and the methanol control group.
RESULTS
1.0 |^BB3oIubility Determination
fH9 Attempts to determine the water solubility oljUBfollowedthe approach given in the test
protocol that is included in Appendix 2. In brief, excess
as received from DuPont -
was equilibrated with deionized water in a separatoj^uBnel. After phase separation, an
aliquot of the aqueous phase was analyzed for fUcontent by purge and trap gas
chromatographic/mass spectrometnc (GC/MS) techniques.
The analytical system used for all determinations consisted of a Tekmar Model 3000 purge and trap concentrator interfaced to a Hewlett Packard Model 589DGC, and a VG Trio 1
mass spectrometer Calibration ^andards consisted of samples oigHwn laboratory pure deionized water containingltalQatconcentrations of 80, 40, 20, T.4"4 2, and 2.1 ,ug/L.
The standards were prepared by caffifullv adding to 25.0 mi- of water appropriate
quantities of a stock^olutipn containing||BJyt a concentration of 40 /^g/mL in methanol.
^fB)w To minimize loss
evaporation, the standards were prepared in purge and trap
test tubes which were secured to the Tekmar purge and trap unit immediately after
preparation.
Based on the chromatographic results obtained during calibration.^Bgappearedto
consist of a mixture of three poorly resolved constituents eluting witn^S retention time of between 4.0 and 4.1 minutes. Mass spectra for each of the constituents were virtually Identical in that they exhibited prominent peaks, in decreasing order of intensity, at mass to charge ratios of 77 (100% intensity), 51 (26% intensity), and 69 (14% intensity) Raw
data illustrating a typical chromatogram and mass spectrum are included in Appendix 3
Also included in Appendix 3 is the derived calibration curve, which proved to be linear with
a coefficient of determination of 0.991.
Samples
^----JR
of^^H^atu rated
water were
analyzed
for^^B^B^Bksontent
on
11
separate
( U occasions, over the course of three separate days. Each run was preceded by the
analysis of a mid-point calibration standard containing
at a concentration of
0.040 mg/L. Recoveries of the standard ranged from a lowofO.037 mg/L to a high of
0.052 mg/L, and averaged 0.046 mg/L (115% of theory).
For reason that are not immediately obvious, the results for the^tyaturated water
solutions proved to be poorly reproducible, ranging from a minimum value of 1.15 mg/L to
a maximum of 16.7 mg/L. For the entire set of 11 determinations, the average was found
to be 6.14 mg/L, with a standard deviation of 5.33 mg/L.
Page 11
60175
'Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CB(
It is equally puzzling to note that the chromatogram obtained for the^BjIjjsaturatweadter
solutions wasdrfferent from that obtained during the analysis oftheTalibration standards
Whereas thefllRpeak had onginally appeared as a poorly resolved triplet, the peak for
the saturated water solutions took on the appearance of a well-resolved doublet, with one peak eluting at a retention time of approximately 3 6 minutes, and the second with a retention time of 4 1 minutes. Again, mass spectra for the peaks were virtually identical
Although it amounts to little more than speculation, possible explanations for the observed
behavior o^H^Pin water include the following:
^^^ so,j||j 1. HR'^^y possess sufficient surface activity to form micellar solutions If ^^JR may^end to form monomolecular layers at the air/water interface and/or at the water/glass interface, making it difficult to withdraw representative samples from the
bulk "solutions" for analysis.
j^^BJRB^Y 2.
be sufficiently reactive to undergo degradation (or polymenzation) in the
Tieafed inlet of the gas chromatograph. If this were the case, it would not be
surprising to see multiple peaks ofvanable intensity.
3 ' Focusing finally on the different peak patterns, and noting that the standards (which appeared as triplets) were analyzed immediately after preparation, whereas the
JBMsaturated water samples (which appeared as well-resojyecLdoublets) had
aged for up to several days prior to analysis, it may be thatU^is undergoing
some unspecified sort of time dependent chemical transformation when allowed to equilibrate with water.
Despite the unusual properties exhibited by^^Blinwater, it can be concluded with a high
degree of certainty that its solubility is extremelylow, most likely on the order of 10 rug/t
or less.,
2.0 g^B^^foRxicity Determination
2.1 Toxicity Range-Finding
All data generated for the toxicity range-finding tests are included in Appendix 4.
The results indicated no acute toxicity to fathead minnows and Cenodaphnia at
targeted
concentrations ranging from 10 mg/L to 1,000 mg/L (actuaL
^(H owH^f concentration may be less than 1,000 mg/L due to apparent accumulation
^^^ on glassware) Toxicity data for these tests are summarized in Table 1
2.2 Acute Toxicity Testing
All data generated for the acute toxicity tests are included in Appendix S^The^
results indicated no acute toxicity to fathead minnows and Cenodapftnia a\
Page 12
60175
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
TABLE 1 TOXiCITY RANGE-FINDING DATA SUMMARY
Test ConcentiatiQp11'
(mg/L------ --^^^
Control12'
001
0.1 1 0
50
JlOO
1,000^
Toxic;ty End-Point'4'
Percent Survival
Cenodaphma
Fathead Minnow
24-Hour 100
48-Hour 100
24-Hour 100
48-Hour 100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
LCso> 1,000 mg/L
LCso >1.000 mg/L
Notes
1
Targeted test concentrations.
2.
Control consisted of EPA moderately hard water and contained '"lol------
3
Actual(B|PLoncentrationmay be less than 1,000 mg/L based on appearance of
feHResidual on glassware used to prepare test solution.
4.
LC5o values estimated based on test organism response in highest targeted test
solution.
Job Number 60175 April 20, 2001
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI 13
OLVER
LABORATORIES
concentrations ranging from 200 mg/L to 500 mg/L. The survival of Cenodaphnia in the methanol control (7D% survival) was reduced relative to the standard control
^A^ (100% survival) andU|test solutions (90% - 100% survival). No reason for this
reduction in survival was identified. The results are summarized in Table
depicted, the LCgo values for both tests were estimated based on the highest|PPy
test solution used and are reported as greater than (>) 500 mg/L.
2.3 Chronic Toxicity Testing
All data generated for the chronic toxicity tests are included in Appendices 6 and 7 and the test results are summarized in Tables 3 and 4. Statisticall^fathead
minnow survival and growth were not significantly reduced by exposure tofBtest
concentrations ranging from 5 to 500 mg/L This was consistent for comparisons to standard laboratory water (no methanol) controls as well as comparisons to control water spiked with 500 p.L methanol. The no observed effect concentration (NOEC) value for this test was based on the highest test concentration used and is reported as NOEC = 500 mg/L. No unusual behavior was observed by control larvae in the dilution water controls and dilution water with methanol controls.
A
\nJheCeriodaphnia chronic test, survival was significantly reduced in the 500 mg/L
UBLoncentration (40% survival) Cenodaphnia survival and reproduction data
were statistically analyzed by comparing the survival and reproduction in each test concentration to the standard control group (with no methanol added) (Table 3) and to the methanol control group (Table 4^Astatistically significant reduction in
reproduction was observed at the 25 mg/LHB|test concentration when the data
were compared to the standard control group, resulting in a non-continuous dosedependent toxicity response In accordance with standard EPA chronic test data evaluation Bigcedures. the NOEC value for this test may be defined as 10 mg/L, the
highesqU concentration under the lowest statistically significant concentration
(25 mg/L). Alternatively, test organism reproduction at the 25 mg/L concentration may be considered aberrant and the NOEC may be defined as 100 mg/L, based on improved reproduction (relative to the 25 mg/L concentration) in the 50 mg/L and 100 mg/L test concentrations The reproduction data analyses showed, no
statistically significant reduction in reproduction in the 100 mg/L and Icws'lBBf^
concentrations when the data were compared to the methanol-spiked control group (Table 4). The NOEC value for the test when compared to the methanol-spiked control was 100 mg/L.
In light of test organism reproduction reproduction in the 5 mg/L, 10 mg/L, 50 mg/L, and 100 mg/L test concentrations, the NOEC for Cenodaphnia is believed to be 100 mg/L.
Page 14
6D175
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBl
TABLE 2 ACUTE TOX1C1TY DATA SUMMARY
Test
Control12' Control with Methanol01
200 300 400 500 Toxscity EndPoinf4'
Percent Survival
Cenodaphn/a
Fathead Minnow
24-Hour 100
48-Hour 100
24-Hour 95
48-Hour 95
100
70
100
100
100 100 100 100 LCso >500 mg/L
95 100 90 95 LCso >500 mg/L
100 100 100 100 LCso >500 mg/L
100 100 100 100 LCso >500 mg/L
Notes.
1.
Targeted test concentrations.
2.
Control consisted of EPA moderately hard water and contained no|HB|
^^T 3.
Control consisted of EPA moderately hard water and contained 500 iA- meth and/l
and noB^^B
4.
LCgo values estimated based on test organism response in highest targeted test
solution.
Job Number 60175 May 3,2001
15
CompanySan^d. Does not contain TSCA CBI
OLVER
LABORATORIES
TABLE 3
Test Concenteation01
(mg/L.^9
Control'2'
5
10
25 50
100 ,, 500
Toxicity EndPoints
CHRONIC TOXICITY DATA SUMMARY COMPARISON TO STANDARD CONTROLS
Toxicity Test Results
Cenodaphma
Fathead Minnow
Percent Survival 100 100 90
Average Reproduction
180 166 171
Percent Survival 98 98 95
Average Growth (mg)
0420 0468 0416
90
13.9*13'
95
0.430
70
152
100
0.442
70
4Q-CT
172
NA'41
100
0.399-
98
0.422
NOEC - Survival = 100 mg/L NOEC - Reproduction = 100 mg/L15' IC^s - Reproduction >500 mg/L161
NOEC - Survival = 500 mg/L
NOEC - Growth = 500 mg/L 1C;; - Growth >500 mg/L15'
Notes'
1.
Targeted test concentrations.
2.
Control consisted of EPA moderately hard water and contained nnoof^i^^J^Bf
^^^^^^*
3.
Asterisks (*) indicates a statistically significant reduction in survival and/or reproduction
as compared to the control group.
4.
Not Applicable. Since test organism survival at this concentration was significantly
reduced relative to the control group, reproduction data was not included in the
reproduction analysis.
5.
Reduction test organism reproduction at the 25 mg/L concentration considered
abberant NOEC reproduction value based on test organism reproduction in 100 mg/L
concentration.
6.
IC^;5s values estimated based on test organism response in highest targsted test
solution.
Job Number 60175
May 3. 2001
^
16
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
OLVER
LABORATORIES
TABLE 4
CHRONIC TOX1C1TY DATA SUMMARY COMPARISON TO METHANOL-SP1KED CONTROLS
Cenodaphnia Toxicity Test Results
Fathead Minnow
Control with
MethanoP
10 25 50 100 500 Toxicity EndPoints
100
166
90
17 1
90
139
70
152
70 40't3'
172
NA14'
NO EC - Survival = 100 mg/L
NOEC - Reproduction =100 mg/L ICas - Reproduction >500 mg/L151
98
0.468
95
0.416
95
0430
100
0442
100
0399
98
0422
NOEC - Survival = 500 mg/L NOEC - Growth = 500 mg/L 10,5 - Growth >500 mg/L
Notes:
1.
Targeted "test concentrations.
2.
Controlconsisted of EPA moderately hard water and contained 500 /^L methanol/L and
no--------
3.
Asterisks (*) indicates a statistically significant reduction in survival and/or reproduction
as compared to the control group.
4.
Not Applicable. Since test organism survival at this concentration was significantly
reduced relative to the control group, reproduction data was not included in the
reproduction analysis.
5.
IC^s values estimated based on test organism response in highest targeted test
solution.
Job Number 60175 May 3,2001
17 Company SaniEized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
OLVER
LABORATORIES
APPENDIX 1 MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
is
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CB!
OLVER
LABORATORIES
The USDS format adheres to the standards a-nd. regulatory requirements of the United States and. may not meet regulatory requirements in other conn-tries.
DuPont
Material Safety Data Sheet
Page
DU004604
J FUJOROTELOKER INTERMEDIATE
Be-vised. 12-JAM-1999
CHEMICAL PRODUCT/COHPAMY IDEHTIFICATION
^_a Material Identification f^H^Br 1s a registered trademark of DuPont.
Company Identification
MAIIOTACTORER/DI STOIBUTOR
DuPont 1007 Market Wilmington,
Street
DE 19898
AONE ITOMBERS
. Product Information Transport Emergency Medical Emergency
: 1-800-441-7515 : CHEMTREC 1-800-424-9300 : l-BOO-441-3637
CQHPOSITXQIT/INrOBMATIOlSr ON IMGREDIEHTS
HAZAHDS IDElTriFICATION
Poten-tial Health Effects
Eye contact may cause eye irritation with discomfort,
tear-ing or blurring of visionBased on related products, inhalation of spray or mist may cause
nasal, tharoaj;, or .Inns irritation. Inhalation of large amounts of respiralale particles may be toxic to the lungs. Symptoms may be modest initially, followed in hours by severe shortness of breath requiring prompt medical attention.
Carcinog-enicity Information None of the components present in this material at concentrations equal to or greater than 0.1& are listed, by IARC, MTP, OSHA or A.6GIH as a. ca.rcinog'en-
19 Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBi
DUO 04604
DuPont
Material Safety Data Sheet
page
FIRST AID MEASURES
First Aid
INHALATION
If inhaled, artificial
remove to fresh,
respiration. If
air. If not
breathing is
breathing,
difficult,
give give
oxygen.
Call a physician.
SKIM CONTACT
Flush skin with water after contact.
before reuse.
Wash contaminated clothing
EYE CONTACT
In case of contact, immediately flush eyes with plenty of water for at least 15 minutes. Call a. physician.
IpGESTIOIT
If swallowed, do not induce vomiting. Immediately give 2 glasses
of water. Never give anything by mouth, to an unconscious person. Call a physician-
Notes to Physicia-as
Activated, charcoal mixture may be administered. To prepare activated, charcoal mixture, suspend 50 grama activated charcoal in 400 m.L -water and mix thoroughly. Administer 5 mL/kg, or 350 mL for an average adult.
-Tsars" Tiearn'ro TIEXBOTES
Flammable Properties
Flash Point
Method.
: Does not ignite
: PMCC
Hazardous decomposition products including carbon dioxide, carbon "monoxide, hydrogen fluoride, toxic gases or particles may be formed, during combustion. These products may cause severe eye,
nose, throat, and lung irritation or toxic effects-
Extinguishing Media
Water Spray, Foa-m., Dry Chemical, C02.
Fire Fighting Instructions Wear self-contained breathing apparatus.
equipment.
Wear full protective-.,
^.nySantee,.^^^^'"TSCACBI
DU004604
. DuEont
Material Safety Data Sheet
(FIRE FIGHTING MEASURES - Continued.)
Avoid breathing decomposition products.
Page 3
ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES
Safeguards (Personnel) MOTE: Review FIKE FIGHTING MEASURES and HANDLING (PERSONNEL)
sections before proceeding with clean-up- Use appropriate PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT during clean-up. Spill Clean Up
Soak up with. sawdust, sand, oil dry or other absorbent ma.tera-al..
Shovel or sweep up. Accidental Release Measures
Flush spill area with water. _J------------------------------------------------------------------
HANDLING AND STORAGE
Handling (Personnel)
Avoid contact with. eyes. Wash thoroughly after handling. Do not store or consume food, drink, or tobacco in areas where they raay become contaminated with this material. Avoid circumsta-ncea that produce respirajble particles unless suitable ventilation, and respirator are used.
Storage
-~Kavp ccciitaJLnex- tightly closed-
Keep away from open flames and heated, surfaces above 200 degrees C (392 deg F) .
EXPOSURE CONTROLS/PERSONAL PROTECTION
Engineering Controls
Keep container tightly closed. Use only with adequate ventilation.
Vent heated extruder or dryer fumes outside work area. Do not aerosolize. In spray applications, use airless type pressure spray equipment at less than 60 psi, and exhaust ducts, drip pans, .or .other design .featur&s to minimize worker exposure tr> mists and over spray. Keep away from open flames and heated surfaces above 200
degC (392 degF) .
21
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
DU004604
DuPont
Material Safety Data Sheet
(EXPOSTOE COKTROLS/PERSONAL PROTECTION -
Continued)
Page
Peraona-1 Protective Equipment
SYE/FACE PROTECTIOISf
Wear safety galases or coverall chemical splash, goggles.
RESPIRA-TORS
Wear' HZOSH approved, respiratory protection as appropriate.
PROTECTIVE CLOTHrNG
Where there is potential for skin contact have available and. wea-r as appropriate, impervious a-lovea, apron, pants,
and jaclcet-
Ebcposure Guidelines
Applicable Exposure Limits Perfluorobutyle thylone
PEL (OSHA) TLV (ACGIH)
AEL * (DuPont)
None Established None Ssta-bliahed 100 ppm, 8 Hr. TWA
* AEL is DuPont's Acceptable Exposu-re Limit. Where govemmentally imposed occnpational exposure limits which ara lower fcba-n the AE1. are in effect, such limits shall take precedence.
Exposure Guideline Comments
No AEL ha.s been established for this product:. Other products with Eluorinated material components have an AEI. of 0.1 mg/io3 to 1 mg/m3 (8 hour TWA) for respirabia size 3ien-qso3- particles.
Air monitoring studies conducted at customer sites indicates that the use of the recommended low pressure (less than 60 psi) airless type, garden type or deck specific hand pump sprayer with spray tip orifice nu n ^nni'm of 0-031 inches in diameter does not produce respirable size aerosol particle concentrations near the AEL.
PHYSICAL AMD CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
Physical Data
Boi-Ling- Point % Volatiles
Solubility in Water
Odor Form Color
Specific Gravity
58 C (136 F) & 100 WT^6
Negligible Ethereal Liquid, Clear Colorless 1.4
760 jam Hg
Company Sanitized. D^s not contafn T8CA CBt
DUO 04604
DuPont
Material Safety Data Sheet
Page 5
STABILITY ASTD REACTIVITY
Chemical Stability Stable at normal temperatures and. storage conditiona.
Incompatibility with. Other- Materials
Nolle reasonably foreseea-ble. Decomposition
Hazardous decomposition prod-nets including carbon dioxide, carbon . monoxide, hydrogen fluoride, toxic gases or- particles may be formed during combustion. These products may cause severe aye.
nose, throat, and lung irritation or toxic effects.
Polymerization
Homopolymerizati'on will not occur. Copolymerization can
occur in the presence of free radical sources, heat or XJV light.
TOXICOLOGICAI. IMFOBMATI01T
Animal Data
Inhalation 1 hour ALC: >7,178 ppm in mice
Oral LD5Q:
>25,000 mg/kg in rats
The product is not a sfcin irritant, ia a mild eye irritant, and is untested for skin sensitization in animals. Repeated
exposure to high levels (5 vol'6) produced blood changes (decreased pisfcelets and. increased monocyte) . Testa in animals demonstrate no developmental toxicity. The product does not produce genetic damage in bacterial cell cultures but has not been tested in animals. Tests for carcinogenic and reproductive activity have not been performed.
DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS
Waste Disposal Treatment, storage, transportation, accordance with applicable Federal, regulations.
and disposal must State/Provincial,
be in and Local
23
Company SanWzed. Does not contain TSCA CBi
DUO 04 604
DuPcnt
Material Safety Data Sheet
Page 6
TRAHSPORTATIOH IMFORMATIOtT
Shipping Information Not Regulated as a hazardous material by DOT, IMO, or IATA.
REGUIATORY IHFORMATlOU
U.S. Federal Regulations
TSCA Inventory Stat-aa : Reported/Included.
TITIS III HAZARD CLASSIFICATIONS SECTIONS 311, 312
Acute
: Yes
Chronic
: Ho
Fire
; Ho
Reactivity : Ho
Pressure ; No
I
OTHER rNFORMATIOH
HTPA, HPCA-HMIS
NPCA-HMIS Rating
Health.
: 1
Flammability
: Q
Reactivity
: 0
Personal Protection rating to be supplied by user depending on use conditions.
The data in this Material Safety Data Sheet relates only to the specific material designated herein and. does not relate to iise in combination with any other material or in any process.
Responsibility for MSDS : MSDS Coordinator
Address
: DuPont Chemical Solutions Enterprise
Wil-inington, De. 19898
Telephone
: 80Q-441-7515
# Indicates updated section.
Tbis information is baaed upon technical information believed to be
rel4-alile. It is jmbjBct 1:0 revision as additional knowledge nnrl
eKperience is gained.
End of MSSS
24 Company Sam-feed. Does not contain T8CA CBI
APPENDIX 2
'SOLUBILITY DETERMINATION TEST PROTOCOL
25 Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
OLVER
LABORATORIES
@
.
Test Protocol for DetermininaJhe Solubility of
i in Water
1
Obtain sample of authentic product from DuPont. No more than 100 mL should be
required
2
Calibrate the GC/MS system using samples of the authentic product. At the same time,
determine a RRi^onfllpn relation to an internal standard having a retention time similar to that of||H^SinceflMlis claimed to exhibit negligible solubility in water,
prepare calibration standards bydissolving carefully weighed quantities of the product as received in a suitable solvent Methanol is suggested. The calibration curve should
be constructed using a minimum of four, and preferably five, calibration standards
J----
3 " Equilibratel^^HWith laboratory pure water as follows
V^^~
a
Place approximately 25 mL of the product as received in a clean 2L separator/
funnel.
6
Add 11_ of laboratory pure water
c
Shake vigorously to intimately mix the two phases, venting to atmosphere as
needed to relieve pressure Allow the phases to separate, then repeat both
steps a minimum of five (5) times
d
After mixing, allow the funnel and its contents to stand undisturbed overnight (to
ensure complete phase separation)
e
Remove a portion of the aqueous phase (upper phase) using a clean transfer
ofH^o pipet Place the sample in a 40 mL VOAviaLeauipped with a Teflon-hned cap
Make-the transfer quickly to avoid loss
the atmosphere When full,
seal the vial with its cap such that zero harospace exists after the cap is secured
Prepare three such vials for subsequent analysis
f
After removing analytical samples, measure and record, i) temperature of the
aqueous phase, and 11)atmospheric pressure
oflH| 4
Analyze all three samples for the presence
Quantify concentration in units of
mg/L relative to the calibration curve and RRF^sdetermined in Step 2
Safety Considerations
The toxicrty oi^ffU although not believed to be high, has not been well-defined All prepara
tive steps should ta^e place in a hood Standard and customary measures should be taken to
guard against skin and eye contact. Should contact occur, follow the procedures outlined in the attached MSDS
7C
'Company Sanffized. Does not contain TSCA CB?
APPENDIX 3 SOLUBILITY DETERMINATION
ANALYTICAL DATA
27 Company Sanitized. Does not contain T8CA CBI
File
Operator Acquired Instrument
Sample Name
Misc Info Vial Number
abundance 110000
100000
90000
80000
C \V012S01\V0012202
BP
22 JAN L 9.02
Tno-1
1000 NG STD
25mls
0
D
us-ng
<^ ^
Cfis-lQfifl.7~/M -J //t^snKD
Acq-Method
TIC V00122Q2.D
^ofi^WW
\
\
70000 60000 50000
r^^ y .
(irtpo^rn
40000
^
i
30000
,
20000,
i
fi 1 10000
1
1 \
1
n,
0
l-
rime-? 3 00 3 20 3 40 3 60 3 80 4 00 4 20 4 40 4 60 4 80 5 00 5 20 5 40 5 60 5 80 6 00
A,bunaance
Scan 490 (4 083 mm) V0012202 0
1
25000 H^s^cr^
20000
15000
10000
-.',
51
5000
69
0
hTl]f/a2-> 3 03
44
,
40 50
57
1,1 60 70
|T108 157^ L
n9^ 8800__9900
^
w
145
100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 221100, |
28 Company SanH?zed. Does not contain TSCA CBi
Response Ratio
^/^ /<? %v
LflLcaRffTic'^ Cuftve-
12-
/
-1
10-1,
-i i
. S-1
j
6-
2-i 1 ,, r, ^
I
' G
-^------,------,------------^------------,------,----------------------------------------------F
0
1
2
3 -
4
Amount Ratio
Reap Ratio = 3.49e+000 * Amt + 1.33e+000
Coef of Det (r^2) = 0.991 Curve Fit: Linear
Method Name: C: \VQ12501----------2 .M
"-
Calibration Table Last Updated: Wed Jan 24 07:52:06 2001
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI 29
Fils
Operator Acquired Instrument
Sample Name
Misc Info Vial Number
abundance 120000
C:\ HPCHEM\1\DATA\VO119 C1\VOG11S 0 3.D
BP
1.9 JAN4 1 13:45
using AcqMethod
25 TMnL^LoX--Q---1---I--^--_ ----HH2200EXTRACT
25mls
0
TIC V0011908D
^^/[}JijRfi-TtQ_ )
(7
.
Z>oi.ori^ C)^-
110000
100000
90000
^f e^^.lr - BCOOO
^
)
2-
70000
60000
i
50000 40000 ;
,
:
J/jTff^^1
^?n*urf^
/ ^ ^
K
^
--
i-^^
i
30000
.
1
'
1 | 20000
'll \ \ | M\A
\
i
10000
\ A '
ifc ^ ~^-<--j\j
1
'..,', 1 . I"ime->
0
^
1 ....;..-----------..'. 1
i
200 250 300 350
'-' . 1 , '-?---------1 - 1'' ' ' ''1 ' ----------, . .-r1! -^r----n---------n---------T 400 450 500 550 600 550 700 750 800 850
"ibundance 450000
; 400000 350000
Sean 424 13 533 mm) V0011908 D
7
wf^/tS^scr^on oF
B^^^^^
300000
250000
200000
5 1
150000
'^1-
100000
50000
69 57
n/z->
i'--.r'li|" 0 - 30
38 35 40
44 ,
S4
82 38
,
'i
.
'--^TTTTTr^"^^^TTT^-r^T^TT^^-
A5 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90
127
95 100 106 113 US
KG
95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150
30 Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
File
Operator Acquired Instrument
Sample Name
Misc Info Vial Number
Iftbundance 120000
C.\H?CHEM\1\DATA\V011S01\V0011508.C '
EP
19 JAN 1 13:45
using AcqMethod "
25 MTrLi--^--^^--E20 EXTRACT
25mls ^^^^
0
TIC V0011908 D
/</
(^/
,
^ftTiW. ^^"^
^z-P^^r/VyV
h^O
7
-^
110000
100000
f f c 90000
80000
/
?
70000
60000
50000
1
^
^
^
?:
R
^
-~'i
^ 1
p.?
k}l i
i^
M
1
40000 1
1
30000
1
1
I
1
l
20000
fl i 10000
'
'"'
'
'
'
~.
i
:
m ^ ',,, ,!, ,/\ time->
':1
2 60
1 ~'i1" i '
3 00 3 20 3 40
'
3 60
''^i .1|'--^--p 11-' 1
3 80 4 00 4 20 4 40 4 50
4 '8i 0' "5
0i"0
52i0'.'5.
1- ''.'
40 5 60
^5 .8.0..6.i0.0
..,,
6 20
i. ...i..
6 40 6 60
.,i
6 80
7.0r0.
7..2-0.-
abundance -2200000
2000000
T
Scan 498 (4 150 mm) V0011908 D
t^MS ^71?^H oF
1800000
1600000 51
1
1^----MH^
l
1400000
.
1200000
69 1000000
800000
:.^
600000
400000
200000 39
0
m/z->
30 40
100
j 1
J
53 I
93
-)-T>1'
36|,
"III 1'r-rA .^
11
50 60 70 80 90 100
1lu08"
;
110
119 120
157 131
|I Ipp 14|5 169
130 140 150 160 170
2C37 'IB1
,
1p8195
180 190 200
227 219 210 220 230
31
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
APPENDIX 4 TOX1CITY RANGE-FINDING TEST DATA
32 Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBl
OLVER
LABORATORIES
OLVER LABORATORIES INCORPORATED ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY LABORATORY
CLIENT _JhiEaa^
TOXICANT/EFFLUENT
TEST SUMMA
ACUTE TOXICITY TEST RESULTS
Cenodaphnia
TEST DATE(S1
l/25-|^-l),|
TEST CONDITIONS TEST ORGANISM AGE DILUTION WATER SOURCE AERATION
^.^ hniM-S
EPA-MHW OLVER LABS
conlinuous
Fathead Minnow
i/^-i/z.iloi
-Z ciay5 EPA-MHW OLVER LABS continuous
CHKON1C I()Xlf:IIY7-EST RESULTS
Cenocfap/ima
TEST ORGANISM AGE DILUTION WATER
SOURCE AERATION
EPA-MHW OLVER LAB
continuous
TEST ACCEPTABILITY CONTROL SURVIVAL (s90%)
loo'/,
lo^/
CONTROL SURVIVAL (^80%) NO OF CONTROL FEMALES
% CONTROL FEMALES WITH 3 BROODS (&60%)
AVE NO YOUNG/SURVIVING FEMALES (& 15)
STATISTICAL RESULTS SURVIVAL IN 100% (.HI';)VICS+ Cont.-^
Lc50
95% C I METHOD
loo'/ > 5 "^ /L
rJD-1-
N0
loc/
'> 6 ^3/1-
M& N[>
AVE WT/SURV CONTROL (z0 25 mg)
SURVIVAL IN HIGHEST (
) CONC
NUMBER OF REPLICATES
NUMBER OF ORGANISM/REPLICATE
NORMAL DISTRIBUTION"?
HOMOGENEOUS VARIANCE?
NOEC METHOD
NOEC SURVIVAL
NOEC REPRODUCTION/GROWTH
COMMENTS t^Da. Not pt.-v^^m'rvA.Vt. f_Auu- Vo lAj.'j.-f-Kc^-V mwWru\
11 nEMPLArElDIODENCIIlOIOADMIWTESTSUM WPO
OLVER LABORATORIES INCORPORATED ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY LABORATORY
TEST SUMMA
CLIENT TOXICANT/EFFLUENT
PoUo^-^p ACUTE TOXICITY TEST RESULTS
JOB NO
(:,on5
PERMIT NO
^/A
ft^nae-F' n AirtJ "Tt &f-&
PAGE
.OF_{_
CHRONIC TOXICITY TFEST RESULTS
Cenodap/ima Falhead Minnow
Cenodaphni
TEST DATEtS^
-Z/l-T-Mol
-z./i-'z-Jz o|
TEST CONDITIONS TEST ORGANISM AGE DILUTION WATER SOURCE AERATION
^^ V^^S
EPA-MI-IW OLVER LABS
continuous
-i I^^C, EPA-MHW OLVER LABS
conlfnuous
TEST ORGANISM AGE DILUTION WATER
SOURCE AERATION
EPA-MHW OLVER LAB
conlinuous
TEST ACCEPTABILITY CONTROL SURVIVAL (^90%)
Inn/
Inn'/
CONTROL SURVIVAL (^80%) NO OF CONTROL FEMALES
% CONTROL FEMALES WITH 3 BROODS (^60%)
AVE NO YOUNG/SURVIVING FEMALES (^15)
STATISTICAL RESULTS SURVIVAL IN 100%
(.H^'-i.+C^t--)
LCao
95% C I METHOD
loo'/.
> 1000 I^.^/L N)CS*
N&
AVE WT/SURV CONTROL (&0 25 mg)
loo'/
> lOon -^-q/L.
ND ND
SURVIVAL IN HIGHEST (
) CONC
NUMBER OF REPLICATES
NUMBER OF ORGANISM/REPLICATE
NORMAL DISTRIBUTION?
HOMOGENEOUS VARIANCE?
NOEC METHOD
NOEC SURVIVAL
NOEC REPRODUCTION/GROWTH
COMMENTS -fr rJ&= Niu4- Cagk-trr.i'^oAjIg. (A\>^. -\-a^$^.-fr;(.l-^ fnor-k\\-t-u'\
1: JEMI'LAt61UIOBEIICII'OIQADMIM\TESISUMVtfPO
Sample Information
Clieni r'i^-,n+
Permit No
''""MI a
Taxicanl/Efdue nl
^
JBBBi- Sample Type
^~ Grab Collected
WA
AM/PM
Composite Col ecled
From
AM/PM
/
To
AM/PM
/
^a'1-'^
/ /
(Date)
/
(Da e)
/
(Da e)
Job No
^o;-75
Sample3 NO
TRC hJ/ A
. mq/L,
Initial p H N/A
Initial G) 0 M/A
Adjustnnents
mq/L
V-L P3
o+ 1
. ACUTE TOXICITY
T eslInfo malion
A nalyst(s ) 5rn,J^^
T eslSpe CIBS P. i^,.n(V^
C ulture N o
^S?'i
StartofTest t'10 End of lest y3^
Test Container Size
AM^i /
AM?F5l 1 ^co W
A as
Z- d-^S
Test Solution Volume
'loo
Lenglh (s<; SD) & H:to.o5CM
Dissolved Oxygen (Time
VVeight (SD) a.L(( A 0.3'- '"5
/
/
/
T est Mod e s-h^Kc-
Aeration fJ/fti
D ilulion ViValer & Pr\ (r)Hb>j
Beq nning Date/Time/Ra e
Pho opened 16-hourda y/0-hour
Cone or %
Rep
5.0 "IS/L A
Number of Live Organisms
0
24
48
ID 10 ]0
% Survival
/O^/
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)
0
24
48
7.S z^ IP
.
pH
0
24
7.7 ^
40
'7,7
Temperature (C)
0
24
48
S5 ^5- ^
Initial Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCOa)
Initial (mg/L a
^0 /o
1-0 PI^L A 10 16 10 /oo/. 7.?S ^ 1 0 77 'T-."?- 7,7 25 a^ 35-
0 1 n-^ A 10 1^ io 10^ -7.^ M- -70 7-8 1-.^ 7.7 25 ^ 3^
0 01 <TVL- A 10 10 \0 (GO/, 1^ :?-,^ 7,^ 7-8 ^1' 77 Z5 ^5~ '25'
^"^ f\ 10 f0 )o (OO/ 2^. ^.(. 7/^ 7.5 ^.-7- ^7 Z5 ^ S?^
(pd
8
^6- Analyst's Inilials/Time
5/n 4'Wn
^
Sfiol ^30
Commenis -^ (& ? i^>-/So -".L Wi?rh<Ani)
^Rr^
'\/// 1 L
Condition o( Organisms al TesI lnilialion/12nd H<D,^\TM
J
5/y\ ^D 5E^
MH^)
, rior-ro^\ , ^ ^
6/r> UMO ^./v) 5/n
c?) -}-^\ ^, '7
,
^Qr^'7 !
\-wo
SM
Notes C-^^t.Li.^ : T
L& 5 o >
N\Tcmp]aleslUioOendi\aculerOXTEST WPD
Sample Informalion
Clieni ^ r^ipnrt
Permil No Toxicanl/EHIuo Sample Type Grab Collected
^
M w ^ ^ iQ| L a - c ^ J -
AM/PM
/ /
Composile Col ecled
(Dale)
From
AM/PM
/
/
(Da e)
To
AM/PM
/
/
(Da e)
Job No , </-75
Samp! eNo
TRC ^/ A
Initial p H N/A
Imlial I:3 0
AJ/A
Ad)uslr"nenis
mq/L mq/L
-^2.
^
'. ACUTE TOX1CIT
T eslInfo rmalion
A nalysl(s ) 5rn ;SR(J
T est Spe cies C-J^oic. C^ullure hJo \r^iM,<W\ Ln\1^^
A 9e
<- i-\ ^^
Lenglh ( stSO)
M//>i
VVeight( xSD)
N/A
1 eslMod e &+^-hc-
D ilulion V/Valer & Pf\ (nHiAS
Start of Test U'-lO AM/1
EndotTesI ^1-5
Tes Conlamer Size
AM/r
3^
Tes Solulion Volume
'Z^
Dissolved Oxygen (T
/
/
'
Aeralion Beq nning Dale/Time/Ra e Pho openod 16-liourda y/0-h
Cone or %
Rep
s.o f'a/L ^ &
Number of Live Organisms
0
24
40
^ 5
5"
5 ? ^5
% Survival
/00><
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)
0
2.1
48
0
-7-& :M 7,^ ^-T
PH
TempBralure (C)
Imlial Alkalinity
Init
24
48
0
24
48 (mg/L as CaCO,) (mg
^ 7.^ 75 a^ 3S
^0
1.0 m^ . A
5
b 5
^ 5
/^c>7 -78 ^1, 7,^ ^7 ^
? 5-3
7? Z'5 ^^ ^
0 ' "V^L A
'S
% 5
- ^ (T
/DO/ :1SL -?(. 7.^ 7.8
5 ^)
q ^ ^-^ 2S
IS' <5S-
0 i-'l TV^ A
s
% 5
I '
5 5? w
b sj
^8 7^ 7^ 7-8
^-L, 7 ^ 26
'
a^ 95"
^"-VTT,^
A
6
Analyst's Inilials/Time
5 f
y
5
)
^B 5m H .IPR
.
5?
^fj
fQO/ 7.0 ^([^ s/n
7-L, ^4 7-0
<-6 SR^ SIT)
Commanis
\/tL /s -X / <s. <\ ^ i-
s
/
d " L /D('-tt,c,nu ^ /
/MiW
^ ^
SU)
Condition of Organisms at Test Inilialion/l Hnd
H<A^VIM , narn~ic,\ . A! I o 175cl/1'i^ J
j
^
7,-] 2.? ?-? a5"
(ffQ
s'e^ S/n
&L6 SlJ Notes Ca,r-h^-tt
^-'-So
fl p pp cfn c/ <hs-o l~f-f)^, /\o 'T7> q / a^ ^hs. ^
N \Templ3lcs\G]oOenchtarule\TOXTEST WPO
1-
co UJ
h-
>-
i-
'4 0 0 X
0
\- <r Ill h3 u <
.2 01
ro ro
u
Q. Q
c 0
U
'
0 Q:
a
^ 10 (^ J J In 0
ft Us
a)
^
0 \P j;.
rr < <
t-t c
ID D)
;?
^ 1 Q
0
1
m (eD 0
N
-0
V) "0
0 >
0
CD c in
7n '55 c 0 m
0
0
ro "E
]3
D
1-
'5
'5
0
<)
0
10
-e -0 ^ in
co c UJ
<D
0)
M
J
01
^ c 3 3 0 J:
03 '5^ ra ro
K XI (U S
^ E 0
j:
U3
.2
'ro
D -0 0 0 c c m
0 c Q.
r Q
ro 01 0
cu m
< 03 0.
c3 -I?
J
i 4:
1 ^ ^ '2
.1 ^ -3' 2
e
J EJ-
c-
1 '/S
>u
| 5' 5' ^ c
c
y
0 rt
^
~m
t/)
Q:
5 0 Q 'M' <B Z ^ ~W wQ. <B
tO M
ffl
? +1 H
"(O
IX
IX
(D
-0
^
0
c 0
^, ^n n3 "s 3
0
t- 1-- <
cu
C
ID
"01 c
01 5
^tn.
'3
0) m
0)
< J
0
1 -J
"0' E
tn
<
r-
<
<
?
$ 0
<
Z
s9 Z
in
z0 0 '0c3.
-U 0 0)
0. Q E
Q
E
'ra "ra
in 3
.00 ro EC.
-0
~] M
c
<
'5'
m n3
- 'a-9
"TO Q
S D-
<
+
2
1 c
0 C.
"ra
-0 c-
a
T3 <
p E
15 ^0
^ c
0
(3 T3
<D 0)
^ a Q
Z
0 W
(U
c in 0 a
| i ^ 5 0
E
'c
E '"
c
n
0
0)
x
CD
(B
OS Q ro
1-
t- LO U 0-
CO u >
n
-
3
ca
t:
u y I U-
3 c
i| "c E.c
I5 U -:
in
M
'0 "
m o
c m
^ U
X? n"
To ei -= 0) E.
\^v^ \ ^ \~3\TO
-v \ \ fo
tO
\
CC\ f^\
0 0
^d
E "
3. 5 < S ~r
1!ra i
s5
^ 03
u
^-
(n
in 3
m
^r
m
CM re
0E -
^ 0 ^0 0,
CO 0^,
a- r^-
<r~
S
Q-
r-
^-
0
^
C
0)
1
0? XI 0)
SE-
0
in tn
Q
1^0
CO
T
T^
r- T CO
CM
0 a; c-
? ^< 0
s? E 0
en
c
^
0 tn
&
-a o)
0
Z
0
^c^
>^"\
^
^-
^ -y
CM
U^
0 in LO
<; 0.
cfi
Q)
Q:
in
OS
lr\ rt
in
CA
r"
r~
C3~
^-
<d-
(^3
r^
^
r''
oC
f-
>;
0 p
c^-
Vf\
1?
\s\ V^
\r\ ^>
<c c^
s? en
0
U
0
0
8 0
cT
e
0 0
\ \
\^ \
^\
f^
ff-
^-r
^ f& Ln ^
u^ t^
^-3 r^ OQ
r~
^
t!^ r"
&X1
r-'
'33 0 x
0
Q
^ ^n
\n ir\
Tt in
<s: j0
J
c3
\
\
v-
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
v i
Q
3
0
si
ft)
A
Q
m VI =tt~ u
-J -^
fl
JS
^
((
0
in
s '5
z
c^ ^
^ ri^
^
^
-Z
C
ej
v-^
i
-z-
tf
fl^.
c
1^7
$
-c -^
ic
<3'
-z
<y
ta
X
C-)
-z %
?
^
C
'z.
&J -3
zl
u'
-2?
^
'on
c
E b
L
E
LO tn
'E 'TO a.
C
<3^
0
I f
< 1.5
^-
o c
LU "E 0
7
c
'm m
1-
"5
U]
f-
l
c a c ^
0 '5
c:
.
-5
c = '
(-.)
Sample Informalion
Clieni
'C'yjporA. -
nnr Permil No
Toxicanl/EKlue Ssmpio Type
Grab Collected
AM/PM
Composite Col ecled
From
AM/PM
/
To
AM/PM
/
r
*
1 1
(Dale)
/
(Da e)
/
(Da e)
Job No
(soils
Sample3 NO
TRC.
Imlial p H
r^^/^ N/A
Inilial D 0
N/A
Adjusinnerils N/A
mq/L mq/L
T esl Into malion'
A nalysl(5 )
T eslSpeass
C ullure f' o"
A ae
T-
Stn.Sfj^
f. fr-m<\q.s
Vio^
ti<^\"i' ,
Length ( KSD)
VVeight (xSD)
T esl Mod e
?^V<K-V\(-
D ilulion V/Valer E^R mW<i
PS i ^
I
. ACUTE TOXICIT
Start of Test -? ;S-0
End of Tesi 35"^
Tesi Container Size Tesi Solulion Volume
AM/($Q
AMitPR
3
S?^
Dissolved Oxygen (Ti
/
/
/
Aeration Beq nning Dale/Time/Ra e Pho openod 16-hourda y/8-ho
Cone or %
Rep
1000 Tng/^ A
Number of Live Organisms
0
24
40
)0 10 ^
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)
%
Survival
0
24
40
0
/o0/. 1&. 7^ ^ ^
pH 24
7.^
Tomperature (C)
48
0
24
40
'15 55 35 0?^
Inilial Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCO,)
Inili (mg/
(.^
\0
iOO rnn/L A -LQ to 10 1^7. 1&. 7 0 ^T ^T 7,^ 7.^ ^5 35 ^
C.n^.1 A ;0 (0 /O \^/. 1SL. 7,^/ -7,0 7^ 7,y 7 5 -^5 3^ 35-
(AL|
..
Analysl's Initials/Time Comments
^rop^
Jm
5^
^
Condilion o( Organisms al Test Imlialion/i 5nd
5-f^ 5/n S^l SEI^ 5^ S^J $&^ i5'/n
V^CflV^M , nor/na\
/
1
H CQ \-^^V/
^n^ ^i
SG.^
^^
Notes
C^-fb^ =^3
L'-'So > l
N\Tpmplate<;<BioBencli\3CulelTOX1ESTWPD
APPENDIX 5 ACUTE TOXICITY TEST DATA
39 Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCACBS
OLVER LABORATORIES INCORPORATED ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY LABORATORY
TEST SUMMA
CLIENT DtAftin-tTOX1CANT/EFFLUENT
^^^^^--
Acu,-^
ACUTE TOXIC1TY TEST RESULTS
ToXvf-i+a
JOB NO PERMIT NO
'n&4i-)3
N/A
PAGE I OF '
CHRONICTOXIC1TY T-EST RESULT
Cenodgphnia Fathead Minnow
Cenodaphn
TESTDATE(S)
Z/M-'Z./lte/of 2/H-Z/lb/o/
TEST CONDITIONS TEST ORGANISM AGE DILUTION WATER SOURCE AERATION
^'zl^ hours EPA-MHW OLVER LABS
continuous
3 d^S
EPA-MHW OLVER LABS
conlinuous
TEST ORGANISM AGE DILUTION WATER
SOURCE AERATION
EPA-MHW OLVER LAB
continuou
TEST ACCEPTABILITY CONTROL SURVIVAL (&90%)
loo'/
^/.
CONTROL SURVIVAL (i00%) NO OF CONTROL FEMALES
% CONTROL FEMALES WITH 3 BROODS (^60%)
AVE NO YOUNG/SURVIVING FEMALES (z 15)
STATISTICAL RESULTS SURVIVAL IN 100% (Hgh-.S.t CaAC^
LCso
95% C I METHOD
^57
>5oo ^/L
NO'*'
\>b>
AVE WT/SURV CONTROL {z0 25 mg)
1^7. > 5 00 r"5/L
NtS rvb
SURVIVAL IN HIGHEST (
) CONC
NUMBER OF REPLICATES
NUMBER OF ORGANISM/REPLICATE
NORMAL DISTRIBUTION?
HOMOGENEOUS VARIANCE?
NOEC METHOD
NOEC SURVIVAL
NOEC REPRODUCTION/GROWTH
iniCMrLA7E>DIOOEMCIHDIOAUMI)llIESlSUMWrD
Sample Inform a 11qnj|^^^^^^
Client' Qnflpn
j^ Permil No
Toxicant/Erflue
Afl^ Sample Type
Grab Collected Composite Col ected
AM/PM
From
AM/PM
/
To
AM/PM
/
/ /
(Dale)
/
(Da B)
/
(Da e)
Job No /.Ol^
Sample3 NO M/^
| T RC
'i
Initial p H
Initial C) 0
|
Adjustr-nenis
ma/L mq/L
Cone or %
Rep
Number of Live Organisms
0
2A
40
% Survival
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)
0
24
48
fDO ^)OM
^
fl
C
D
5"
5
5' 5
5"
?
5"
^
S-)
1 S R 3' 70
^
^1
^/-
57
P3 1 o f -Z,
T est Infor mation
A nalyst(s ) ,?^ / ^ E. ^ T eslSpe cies C'.fnwfoan/iii dubio.
C ulture N o ^ridiui'c/iio. 1
A ne c-;?i./ /irf
Lenglh (i;<SD) */ //i
\^Veighl ( xSD) ^/^
T est Moc e
3.-fc.hc-
D ilulion V^aler 'rA /Mt/i-i
ACUTE TOXICITY
SlarlofTest End of Test
/30 AM/ ia.^0 AM/
Test Container Size 30 MI
Test Solution Volume 3i'A<l
Dissolved Oxygen (Tim
/
/
/
Aeration ^/.A Beq nning Dale/Time/Ra e
Pho openod 16-hourda y/8-hou
pH
0
24
4Q
^ P 1-S 7J
Temperalure (C)
0
24
43
as
a'' ^5
Initial Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCO,)
Inilia (mg/L
i-loO pp/^
A
6
c.
0
S
5
^ 8 ^^ -7.0 ^.f ^ i? ^
^4 ?
^o/.
S
5'
v
5"
5
^^
25 2? ?5
300 ^M A
6
C-
J3
Analyst's Initials/Time Comments
5 ^ ^^
S ?
'I S ^
^ 5' .f
^' ^
5;
Spi 11.1,0
100 /
J^rJ
Condilion of Organisms at Test Initiation/I=nd /iM/^ii/
'
1 S ^ 3 7.0 1-S ^ ^ 7f7 a? i^ 7^
iJ> <,<-6, ^
^ ^^
norMd-1 ^or' ^ T^ Con+Ti) U
- ^
t,Lfi ^
Notes ft)ri)oi/^
Lc-c,
^(/-^QL/+ ^e~; ^ Q n o f aw^OTrPc/ l^
N UemplalBsWioDencWaculBnOXTEST WPD
Sample Inlormalioi^^M
CPeliremntil NDo uoo^r7^~^^
Toxicanl/Efnue
Sample Typa if ^ff^^^^ Grab Collecled
Composite Col Bded
From
AM/PM
To
AM/PM
AM/PM
/ /
/ /
(Date)
/
(Da e)
/
(Da B)
A/^f Job No . -
SampI eNo hjft TRC
Initial p H
Initial t3: 0
Adjust ments \/
mq/L mq/L
T oslInfo malion
A nalyst(s ) ^if>, -R rJ
T eslSpe cies ('fryirAa/i/i/c dubiQ-
Cculture h o .nrfii/i'cAlO <
A^ae < ji./ /in .
L englh (xSO) u!A V'Velghl (xSD) vlA
T ost Mod e
A tc.hc
Cdilution \ /Valer CP^ |T-IH^
P3 2.^ o-^ ~&1
ACUTE TOX1CIT
Start of Tesi End of Test
/30 AM/' Ie? So AM/^
Test Container Size 30^1 Test Solution Volume 9S'^i
Dissolved Oxygen (rim
/
/
/
Aeration ^//A Beq nning Dalen'ime/Ra e
Pho opened 16-hourda y/8-ho
Number of Live
Dissolved Oxygeri
Organisms
(mg/L)
pH
Temperature (C)
Cone or %
Rep
0
2-1
^^
% Survival
0
24
4d
0
24
40
0
24
Initial Alkalinity
Inilia
48 (mg/L as CaCO,) (my/L
100 SA^\
^
'
6
c
0
5"
^'
5^ 5' 5
4 ^/. 5" ?
^5r/ 5" 5
\ s q.T- 7P -{ ? 1-^ 11 ^
^S- 3.5
(U-o/
A
vJ '/foo^L 6
ftfori
c.
0
^
5"
0>-'
^8 1-3 1.0 ^ ? ^ ~\ 11 2.5 a? ^5
4( ^ 5
7o/
j" $
$
JB )------
:^S S 54
ConN
^
5
H
?
C.
?.
D
b
^ Analyst's Inilials/Time
Commenis
> ftCCicliTi+'iUi.f
?
^
5 S
;^>
V
viynic
^
< /&0/
45/ se.^ isA0
SerJ
in 4h'1- n ri.1')
Conclilion o( Organisms al Tesi Inilialion/E-nd
hwl^f)L/
'
=1 S r)^ 1.0
s^ 6.-6 JW
Ct,|ymii
/i,/-Aia//0 n1^
I ^
^
.^^a
1 t 11 a? a? -^S
SLO ^
5Liy 5L.& S^
^"tT"0 1^ >-"Hi-i+ tvvi rl,'Lnl
GO
Notes ftirfroi/^^ up^ci/rec/ (^pnl4
N \Teiii|'ildlos'DioOoncli\ociilc\TOXTEST WPO
Sample Inform alion
----1 Client L^E
"^B^ Permit No
Toxicanl/Efflue
" l -- t Sample Type
Grab Collected
^^^^^
AM/PM
/ /
Composite Col ecled
(Date)
From
AM/PM
/
/
(Da e)
To
AM/PM
/
/
(Da e)
Job No &U/75
Sampit6 No
TRC
^A
Initial p H
Initial C3 0
Ad)usl nenis
\>
mQ/L mo/L
i^ ; D-^Z.
. ACUTE TOX1CITY
Tebt Inrormalion
A nalysl(s ) a/n /Lm^
T eslSpe cies
C ulture N o
A QC
p. (i^n-i-el^
fio^
5 'Jf'~>.s
Length (;;SD) c).^6! A o,oC
VVeight( sSD) 3 4 A a 2-1
T esl Mod e
5-)*,h'C
D ilulion V/ValBr epfl ftlH^i
Start o( Test End ol Test
f.'.OQ AM/pivd 1^ f^WS
Test Container Size Test Solution Volume
Cpoo
'^So
c.yn
Dissolved Oxygen (Tim
w3
/
/
/
Aeration
Beq nning Dale/Time/Ra e
Plio openod 16-hourda y/8-hou
Cone or %
Rep
Number of Live Organisms
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)
%
0
21
40
Survival
0
24
48
0
pH
Temperature (C)
Initial Alkalinity
Initia
24
48
0
24
48 (mg/L as CaCOj) (mq/L
5CC Pfm A B
In 1 /O 1"
10 fool- 7,B 7.0 ^.?) 7.6 7-5 -^ ^5
Ib 106 1-
^T ^-
(f^L
^co pp^ A
B
10 10 (0 i60 1 -7-& 7-o 1^ 7. ft 7.^" -^7 ^5 ^^ ^5
10 IQ fO 1 00 1 .
300 Pprr\ A B
'7.00 fpm A
6
so Iff /o
10 l6 10
IQ /o IQ ID IQ /o
loo't, -7.8 -?-^ (^(P -7.& 7^ 77 25 ^ ?.^
160 1.
16Q1- ~1'?) 7-0 r^ 7.8 ^
tool-
/3^l^'O'
77
%
3>5-
5,5
C-o.v^ 1 A
10 , q c!
6
10 lo 16
Analyst's Inidals/Tinie /rtt.H ^ ^
Comments
Condition of Organisms at Test Inilialion/EEnd
^o''
i0&/-
'i/wo
ncAl/'huJ
"76 7^ ^(P ~7.& 7.6- 77
5/71 i-w Vf^ Sn^ LmT? \^0
norrn^ / H (^l/kJti, norrrvi
y
25 ^5t5(T-) LwD
^
Ll^D
(eC>
Notes
Co-rboM^'T
^-=IE >"5oo
N \Templales\BioBench\,icule\1 OXTEST WPD
Sample Inform alion
^^^
Cheni
r-) t^-pjr^T-B^^^B
Permit No Toxicanl/Ernue Sample Type Grab Collected
m iAM/PM
Composite Col ecled
From
AM/PM
/
To
AM/PM
/
/ /
(Date)
/
(Da e)
/
(Da e)
Job No &OH&
SampI sNo Wft
| TRC
i
Initial p H
Initial C30
1
. Adjuslinents
ma/L mq/L
P-> -2 o
. ACUTE TOX1CIT
/^p Test Information
A nalysl(s >m
Start of Test ^ on AM^P
T est Spe cies p p^in^ (<-,5 EndofTest i 50 AM?Pfy
C ullure N o
(fio'-l
Test Container Size
(j^po
A 98
5 d-AA)5
Test Solulion Volume
'-/^
L englh.,(>xSD) o '-fTi oo'- c-"i
Dissolved Oxygen (Tim
VVeight ( siSD) 7 i-l -t 0.21 w<\
/
/
/
T es! Moc e
S +a.-ft'('.
Aeration
D ilulion V/Valer
&/'fl /v>Hi,\
Beq nning Dale/Tirne/Ra e Pho openod 16-hourda y/B-ho
Cone or %
Rep
Number of Live
Dissolved Oxygen
Organisms
(mg/L)
PH
%
Temperature (C)
Initial Alkalinity
Initia
0
24
-10
Survival
0
24
40
0
24
48
0
24
40 (mg/L as CaCO,) (mg/L
C^n-^
A
[mi D^\) %
TUD ><!-
1 0 1 |0 loo / 7-8 7?. ^.^ "^fi ^5 7-.T 75 ^6' ^
10 s0 10 ;0u /.
/'
Analysl's Initials/Time Comments
M6.H 41
l.rtID
i r'
Condition of Organisms at Test lnilialion/1;nd
Lwp s^ WD L^O 5-n UnO wo S's-i 1^0 \^0
Hec.lt-^, , vn/irmc, //HtcJ/f^^ j , no.-rp^i
Noleb
CiAfbo^ ^
N nBmplalBs\BioOBndi\aciileMOXTEST WPD
APPENDIX 6 CHRONIC TOXICITY TEST DATA
Pimephales promelas
45 Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
OLVER LABORATORIES INCORPORATED ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY LABORATORY
CLIENT Q^pon-l-
TOXICANT/EFFLUENT.
JOB NO PERMIT NO
GonS
f-VA
TEST SUMM
PAGE
OF '
TEST DATE(S)
ACUTE TOXICITY TEST RESULTS
Cenodaphnia
Fathead Minnow
CHRONIC TOXICITY T EST RESUL Cerioclaph
TEST CONDITIONS TEST ORGANISM AGE DILUTION WATER SOURCE AERATION
EPA-MHW OLVER LABS
continuous
EPA-MHW OLVER LABS
continuous .
TEST ORGANISM AGE DILUTION WATER
SOURCE AERATION
EPA-MH OLVER LA
continuo
TEST ACCEPTABILITY CONTROL SURVIVAL (a90%)
CONTROL SURVIVAL (;>80%) NO OF CONTROL FEMALES
% CONTROL FEMALES WITH 3 BROODS (&60%)
AVE NO YOUNG/SURVIVING FEMALES (;> 15)
STATISTICAL RESULTS SURVIVAL IN 100%
LCso
95% C I ME1HOD
COMMENTS
AVE WT/SURV CONTROL (zO 25 mg)
SURVIVAL IN HIGHEST ( 5oo "ZS/L ) CONC NUMBER OF REPLICATES NUMBER OF ORGANISM/REPLICATE NORMAL DISTRIBUTION? HOMOGENEOUS VARIANCE-7 NOEC METHOD NOEC SURVIVAL NOEC REPRODUCTION/GROWTH "t^S." Rcf>nitju.cA\oo/(j-oit>-tii
im EMPLATF'niOBEIICHlB10ADMIH\TESTSUM WO
OLVER LABORATORIES INCORPORATED ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY LABORATORY
TEST SUMM
CLIENT D">Por-rlJ TOXICANT/EFFLUENT
JOB NO PERMIT NO
ACUTETOXICin'r TEST RESULTS Cenodaphnia . Fathead Minnow
(j p|-T5
^ - f^,
PAGE ' OF__
CHRONIC TOX1CITY TrEST RESUL Cenodaph
TEST DATEfSI
TEST CONDITIONS TEST ORGANISM AGE DILUTION WATER SOURCE AERATION
TEST ACCEPTABILITY CONTROL SURVIVAL (2 90%)
EPA-MHW OLVER LABS
continuous
EPA-MHW OLVER LABS
continuous
TEST ORGANISM AGE DILUTION WATER
SOURCE AERATION
-
CONTROL SURVIVAL (2 60%) NO OF CONTROL FEMALES
% CONTROL FEMALES WITH 3 BROODS (;>60%)
EPA-MH OLVER L
continuo
AVE NO YOUNG/SURVIVING FEMALES (215)
STATISTICAL RESULTS SURVIVAL IN 100%
LC^o
95% C I
1?
METHOD
COMMENTS -$(- Corral
l>j&,4r/-
i^ir+^-i Ac^e^
nn<;-^^.no\
AVE WT/SURV CONTROL {tQ 25 mg)
SURVIVAL IN HIGHEST ( 5oo ^3/1.) CONC
NUMBER OF REPLICATES
NUMBER OF ORGANISM/REPLICATE
NORMAL DISTRIBUTION'?
HOMOGENEOUS VARIANCE'?
NOEC METHOD
NOEC SURVIVAL
NOEC REPRODUCTION/GROWTH
( SOQ^-L
'nc.-zc,'. Rt.pr,iju,Aonif (j-^^H-i
o-f- -<4v>c^,o\ PI<- \ Li4<^ o-(-
d;lu.+iB^
uj<^.+<-^\
>1 >TEMPLATE'BIOB6HCmBIOAOMimTFSTSUM WPD
OLVER
LABORATORIES
AQUATIC TOX1C1TY TEST SAMPLE FOR STANDARD SYNTHETIC DILUT
Client- P^on-^
Effluent/Toxicant _ Synthetic Dilution Wa!??"
Testing Requirements
48-Hour 48-Hour 96-Hour
^deratelv Hard Water
Acute Cenodaphnia Test Acute Fathead Minnow Test Acute Fathead Minnow Test
(MHW)
Job Number Permit No
Cpc.l-76
P
f^>/A
>< 7-Day Chronic Fathead Minnow Tes _
3-Brood Chronic Cenodaphnia Teal ~.Other
_________________
TEST DAY Carboy No /Identification
Pieparalion Date
Time & Day of Use
Age of Dilulion Water'''
Aihalinily (mg/L) (Acceptable Range 60-70 mg/L)
1
^ y <2-/3/0/ ^'^m^^/-?/> I
'7 ^ Q^l 5
(o0
2
^--y
^l3^]
^^m^//'/^
6?(;|d[^ S
^/
3
=^3 c?/(5 /ol
'^am^ ;5/C!l
a^ci^J
4
=^3
a/i?/o(
^''"am^a /A./OJ
3 c(dy5
5
^ ^ a / / t F / D /
;)^oam^a//7/0(
1 rf^
6
^^
^/(p/c
1 "fm/^^ /1^
oi d^
^0
IpO
60
(p0
Gpo
Hardness (mg/L) (Acceptable Range 80-lOOn-K.i/Ll
Conductivity {t'rtihos/cm]
PH
Total Residual Cl, (mg/L)
D 0 (mg/L)
^
30 o
7-?
ND'
^ ?
^7
3 o d
-7.^
ND
7-^
%
30 "7
-7.^
ND
1 ?
^y^
s^
7,?
NO
7^
^
3^/
-7.^
NO
-7,9
Continuous
7^
313
^.0
NO
7 ?
Conlinuon
C(O2)MEMaEchNTbSalch mof Sdiylunljt&nnewl.if.a- edrilu-is.tion..no. tw.u.a.s.tee-d.r.I.fso..ra.r-me,o-nraer-Bl-hriaw.ni. lh14la^dhanyrsalfnorlulowriRinignntih7pe-dprweaplaRrfatainodn draaaleaent orade chemicals fEPA/600M-91/002l------------------
NO = Not Detectable
OLVER LABORATORIES
LARVAL FATHEAD MINNOW SURVIVAL and GROWTH TEST
SURVIVAL DATA SHEET
CLIENT. PERMIT NO
EFFLUENT/T_O_XICANT
DILUTION WATER PP^ f^l-W _
PHOTOPER10D 16 hr Day/8 hr Night
CONC REP START
1
2
A
10
i<s
!o
Can^f B
C
D
10
f6
fft
10
G 10
10
!6 is
^\ JOB NO (lOUS
PAGE / of -Z
,,
TEST ORGANISM AGE
Z- Whf^ TT^
START of TEST _J^ A WP M}JU./I^1
END of TEST 1'^ A M^P ^-^.IJQJOi
NUMBER SURVIVING PER DAY
3
4
5
6
7
6
1 0 to ;0 /0
&
iQ 0
10 i0
n 10 0 ^ ^
o /0 0 In
10
COMMENTS
TEST SOLUTION VOLUME 250 ml TEST CONTAINER SIZE 600 ml
A
^
8
^L C
0
10
Ift
0
(0
10 \
lo i0
FEEDING 0 1 ml BRINE SHRIMP NAUPLll 2-3 TIMES PER DAY
10
I 0
10
10
^ ^\
^ ^
10
lo !0
0 10 t. 10 10
10
16 t0 10 10 10 10 10
A
B
16
C
^L 0
A
B
^l C y^lL 0
10
[0 10 /
10 0 10 }
10
16 /0
16 /0
0 /^ 10
10
10 13 10
So }0 10 16
10
10
1.0
^
1 t 9 ^
10
fo i0 [6
i0 \0 9 ^
10 10 10 10 fo fn /0 10
10
1^ \6
Q
10 \o 10 ^
10
10 f0 10 1^ /o /0 /6
A
^
8
^SL. C
0
10
is 10
0
/Q \o /0 Iff
10
10
i0 10 /0 ]o 10 10
10
10
\6
Q
/Q lo 1 10
10
1
i0 10 10 )6
/Q 10
A B
lo0^ C
D
ANALYST
COMMENTS
10 10 10 10
PL^
Fij /-k< n
/0 [0 0
/0
A' i0 0 /0
10 |0 10
10
10
0 1,6 \D
^
Lrup
'jlO
^ii
^P
^f-^ H^P
V-! ^j/j____Qro.anisrn^
0 /0 /0
h 10 10
lo /^
to /0
^
L^D
^70
Off/Q/a r
i0
(0 ^
hsa.l-i^if
^'f~ '/c's /- 1-11'/-''~ 'n'^n ^r-A
^ornp\r.ris ^
N 'TcniplaicsiBioBenchYchronicSFH^-ISURV WpO
49
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
fleviicd November I MOO
LARVAL FATHEAD MINNOW SURVIVAL and GROWTH TEST
SURVIVAL DATA SHEET
CLIENT ^P'-fR^i-*
PERMIT NO
EFFLUENT/T_O_XI_C_A_N_T. DILUTION WATER ffl m^^
PHOTOPERIOD 16 hr Day/8 hr Night
CONC REP START
1
2
3
A
B
5oo
^L. C
D
10
/0 /0 10
10
10 lo 1
10
/o {0 10
10
;o 10 SO
/0 A
10
/0 />
Carrkol
B
10
10 /0 /0
-y ^i- C ;
10
/Mc-f^'-ino
D
10
10 7
^
10 In /0
A
10
B
10
C
10
D
10
/y^ ^AMjg^2- JOBNO Ijini 0
TEST ORGANISM AGE. START of TEST 3
W) PPAAGGEE,-2- , of "-2
^-Zj^-^J < 1-ZH
I /5 I ol
END of TEST ^ A M I^^^TSffI 0 I
4
5
6
7
COMMENTS
f^ lo /0 9
/0 lo
/0 /0
)0 /67
9 ^
/o /(?
^ ^
TEST SOLUTION VOLUME. 250 ml TEST CONTAINER SIZE. 600 ml
)D 1. /0
!0 lo /^
^ ^ ?
C; ^ f
?^ /0 ^
?
FEEDING 0 1 ml BRINE SHRIMP NAUPLIl 2-3 TIMES PER DAY
A
10
B
10
C
10
D
10
A
10
B
10
C
10
D
10
A 3 C D
ANALYST COMME:NTS
10
10
10
10
MCH
5^ ^ uriCi
3-oT? 2^D
^KJ ^^
C^l+or-i-^ lfc;0 -C.''/'Yflft',5 ftnif Aff/jpur
^
^ p i? /T^,,/
y
Cf-(- -^e r-f- -i^r/-,(1-/-)0/^ r Comolc^y
N 'TcmplilcslBioBcnch'ichromriFHMSURV W?D
50
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CB1
imsed Noc.-nber I 2000
LARVAL FATHEAD MINNOW SURVIVAL and GROWTH TEST
GROWTH DATA SHEET
LABORATORIES
CLIENT
JOB NO _J_01-?2.
PAGE f
PERMIT NO
ANALYST Lm^
EFFLUENT/TOXICANT JHBL___.__-
INITIAL BALANCE CALIBRATION CHECK Expected
DATE Weight
WEIGHED
-)6 QO
_3^1^1.i^j_
rnq / Actual Weight
of ^
,,
Hl_JU_ mg
CONC
REP
FOIL WEIGHT (mg)
FOIL WEIGHT + FISH
WEIGHT of FISH
NO of SURVIVING FISH
AVERAGE ^ WEIGHT PER FISH
PERCENT SURVIVAL
^-m A .
/O ^ H (p
/^ ^
/
("'?
J5nrrJ B IOkW
/// 79
^r/f
10
C 113 1-0
1/^95
^ ^z
y
0
P/o^
?$"W
'-1 o^
/o
.H^2
- 57)
31Z
H^
/^>^) //
/no / ^ /<
/o^) ^-
A
9^-W
/<?? /^
TI^
/ o
(Urol B 9^3? ^3^ 3.50
/Q
(.^oH) C ^(p.O^
^S^ ? ^
f
D I !o^ (s7 /^[/ 7^
^ /O
9
^iH 3^o
^5-3 . 'I/O
/^ /
/^^ /
^9^//.
A /os 9^ /n^,^^ ^ 00
/^
B ^9 /,?
~?3.^^ ^.30
1
^^/L C f/ ^(0
^ ^z 5"^.l
10
D ?0 5^ P^^^ H^!
IQ
.5^6
^^0
-S^^
^^
/^/9 /
^ /
/ro'/
loo '/
^5^ A
?5'/93
4 S^
/o
/O
B '7-f^?
?^ ^5 H ^n
16
^/L- C ^^. ^
7^ '/5
H^l
1 6
D "P7-66,
^1 0^
3 H3
?
"/5-^y
^.5/.
^^/
. 3^3
1^0 / loo /-
1DO'/^0 /
A
B
^5-
^3^ C D
^656
^P.^^^9
9?./^
^3 ??
/o.?77 ^5 ^
10^. ^H
3^
5 03 ^ ^
L}.^
7 /o
7 -
10
.-5^
. S-63
."y;?
.^y^
^ /-
/^^y-
^"/
/c'o /
A 75: 5-/
&>.^ ^ ^
/o
5'0
B ^ ^^ ^ 5^ 1 /o
IC>
^P^
.^// 7
100 '/
~
/r/o /-
C
^/L/
^/^
^ ^i, 3.^
f0
D ~7V "^ 7^5^ ^ ^
/O
377 vyy
/^o '/
1^0 "/
FINAL BALANCE CALIBRATION CHECK. Expected Weight
COMMENTS Clllhir/ -f^/ y/0
5'6 00 mg / Actual Weight V'9. "7^ mg
y-
^e^pa^e. ^j
Q ^ _ 1 u-'c.\'s\-d- ^oci-s.^ o,-. Hv.- nrt'Qi'i-.^i
r-i^.ri'o^- o-p
la.f^ae_.
N '.Tcmplalcs'.B]oBcnch\chronic\FKMGRWTH WPD 51
Rcmscd November I 2000
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
LARVAL FATHEAD MINNOW SURVIVAL and GROWTH TEST
GROWTH DATA SHEET
LAB 0 RATO R(E S
CLIENT ^PU-PO^ ^
JOB NO (1,0,7s'
PAGEJL of-2--
_______-____ PERMIT NO
ANALYST
imD_
EINFITFILAULEBNATL/TAONXCIECACNATLI_BRBAlTBIO|plTCCH--EC._K_~.Expected
DATE Weight
WEIGHED
5^ 00
SJI^JU-
mg / Actual Weight
J^UJL-HIS-
CONC
REP FOIL WEIGHT FOIL WEIGHT WEIGHT of
NO of
AVERAGE ^
(mg)
+FISH
FISH
SURVIVING FISH WEIGHT PER FISH
PERCENT SURVIVAL
^^T ^3^ ^77 //.^ A
9/5^
/O
B
76 'a^
?06'f?
3.^3
I'O
/oo
C '77 /^ ^ /7
8 ^^
to
^ 0
J3/ /o
/ ^ A
/,^
/O^ 0-5 .^ ^3
/o
7/^ 5(50 B 1^ ^7-
^ /.^
7
.W
-3P3
59??
-33/
^^
. ^/^
100 f.
166 /. /06'/-
loo /.
/oo'/
% /,
C
^/L.
^/6.
^37y ^/ ^?
/o
D ; ^S? S^.?0 ^ ^/
10
H^
W
/^^ /-.
/oo 7
A
B
C
0
A B C 0
A B C 0
A
B
C
D
FINAL BALANCE CALIBRATION CHECK Expected Weight __5"g. 0 0
mg / Actual Weight -9'7 1^' m9
.
COMMENTS r^j.jHt^-1^
- ^ i _ t^c-^-c^j!. ^m'^r b^sS-^A a^ i'tKL jgy-ie vVi Q.I
ng^'P^^-c^-
l-Q-yv&Lj-.
N 'Tenipl!iics'.BioBcncMchronicifKt[GRWTH WPD
52
Company SanHteed, Does not conlain T8CACBI
Rcns.cd November I :000
CHRONIC TOX1C1TY TEST
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Page_/_ ofY
O L V E R LABORATORIES
CLIENT _'Di)pQnT-JOB NO IVORS'
_____ PERMIT NO
EFFLUENTn-OXICANT _
DILUTION WATER KPR
IN1T1AL
DAY
1
TEST INITIATION DATE ^l/^lol
TEST COMPLETION DATE ^ ''-/ft i
TEST ORGANISM P 0 ro A (. la. ^______
PHOTOPER10D
^6-HoiirDav/8-Hour Night
LIGHT INTENSITY 50-100 ft-c
CONCENTRATION CCoon-nfTOjrp(jfW^/f 5^ SQO .^J.a1t- AM^v-:Kaw^^ooO\}
DAY
2
DAY
3
DAY
4
DAY
5
DAY
6
DAY
7
COMMENTS
PH D.O (mg/L) Temperature (C) Conductivity (^mhos/cm)
Hardness (mg/L as CaCOj
7B 1.^ 7~7 7?
'^ -7.6 "79 ^^ -^?
^5
^6" ^5
5o0 3oo ,^?^ w
7-^ ^0 -^
-7-^ 7^ "^
'^^ Sb ^ '^1^ ^13 3/'4
Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCO,)
Analyst's Initials
5m SiZ^J LmD U^D -r^ se^ LmP
FINAL pH D.O. <mg/L) Temperature (C) Conductivity (^mhos/cm) Analyst's Initials
INITIAL
75
(^.0 X5 ^ Sf.^
DAY
1
^f-
7^ 7.-?)
,^^ ,^
^ ^^
1^ 7-J? 5^ 3-c?
3^ 95
^^ .^.3 33^ ^96
UT]D //nn 5R^ ^/'
CONCENTRATION Coh-h'Cll
DAY
2
DAY
3
DAY
4
DAY
5
73 ^^
?>^
^^
LM7
DAY
6
ft)
^..L
^
W
\^\
^"TH^U ^iiTt-t-r\ l^
; > ,'f^aa Co^renhccf-iw.
j
DAY 7
COMMENTS
pH D.O. (ma/L) Temperature (C) Conductivity [ymhos/cm) tiardness (mg/L as CaCO,)
f-.^ -T? ^
3^0
^
7-^ 7-^
7^ ^
2^ ^^'
3oo ^^
2^ ^
Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCO,) Analyst's Initials
fcO L^D
LoO 60
S^^J imo
FINAL pH
-1.5 2?"/ n
D 0 (mg/L) Temperature (C) Conductivity (/^mhos/cm) Analyst's Initials
G,0
55
3!6
JSW
5n 5 ^
^^ ^
3?)0 ^0
^r?o LniT)
N ffEMPLATE'.BIOBENCHlChRONIC'.CMRONCHE V;PD
-'?--?? -7.7
7-,^ 7-? ^ 55
w 3^
1^ <?^
LeC) fco
LtYW) ^R^
7o 7?
7-S? ^-^ ^s ^53)3 ^H ^ q^iot
(o0 ^"69
^M i-rx?
1.^ 7-^ 75 7.6,
^^ ^ /,0 // 0
35 ^-^ 33 ^
^ ^ 2^/3
w 3^5
^fJ A/^ i^O t^?
(^^ ^^/o^ 1ACCMT
Revise November 1 2000
53 Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
O L V E R LABORATORIES
^% fk
N^iBh^
CUENT T)nppn+
"-" -.in /,n'i'?5'V^
CHRONIC TOX1C1TY TEST
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
page -^ of H
N \TEMPIATE'BIOBENCH\CHRONIC.CHRONCHE WPO
54 Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CB1
CHRONIC TOX1C1TY TEST
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Page
of '-i
O L V E R LABORATORIES
^
CLIENT T)u p0n+ ~f9HHJL JOB NO hO\^S *-
PEEFRFMLITUNEONT_/T_O_X_iC_A_Nf ijBBB-^i
DILUTION WATER. gP4 /YTffu7
TEST INITIATION DATE '3-/ (3 /pi I
TEST COMPLETION DATE. W-^1 6 j
TEST ORGANISM
^
_
<g rg^ <_ jg ^___N_ic_h_F
PHOTOPERICO
t6-Houf Dav/8-Hour
LIGHT INTENSITY 50-IOOft-c
INITIAL
DAY
1
DAY
2
DAY
3
50 ?P^
DAY
4
DAY
5
DAY
6
DAY
7
COMMENTS
pH
D 0. (mg/L) Temperature (C) Conductivity (^mhos/cm) Hardness (mg/L as CaCO,)
T-r
7-.?
Z5
360
zs 7.7 7.^
-^ -7-g 9-?
^5 ^ ^^
^0 ^>T- ^7
7^ ?.o ^
7-^ 7J -T^
J? ^ ^'7
'314 Z}3 ^1^
Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCO,)
Analyst's Initials
UrO 5??^ /(n0 ?^T) W
TM Lyw
FINAL pH D.O. (mg/L) Temperature (C) Conductivity O-imhos/cm) Analyst's Initials
INITIAL
7.5
(^.0
^5
3n
^i^l
DAY
1
7^ -7^ 7.1/ 7-3 ^
.^-^ ,^^ ^ ^^
5,0 3-0- ^0
^ ?-^ ^
3/^ ^ 33) 336 ^^
/^D 4nn ^^ ftft IX)
CONCENTRATION_____^-> t?PJ^,
DAY
2
DAY
3
DAY
4
DAY
5
DAY
6
^
^^
^53^fff ImD
DAY 7
COMMENTS
pH D.O. (mg/L) Temperature (C) Conductivity Cumhos/cm) Hardness (mg/L as CaCO,)
"r^
7?
Z5
^00
7^ 7^ ^^ 7J 7^ ^
^5 ^^ ^^
3^o ,^-7- ,^7
7^ ^,0 7 ^
7.? 7-? z? ^h '^S a^
3)V W 3/^
Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCO,)
Analyst's Initials
^Two ^!?^ VnO L^T) ^^ ^ LmO
FINAL
1
pH
7-^ ^3 "7^ l'?.^l 7.^ 73 -M
D 0. (mg/L) Temperature (C)
3A (oQ ^0
^ ^^ ^5
^.0 3-9 ^.0 5.f ^5 ^'7 15- fl5'
Conductivity (^mhos/cm) 3o0] 710
Analyst's Initials
SP^ ^0
N \TEMPl_ATeBIOBNCH\C'riRONlQCrlRONCrlE WFO
2 j
5A^
A^ ^^(
55
331 A^
m
\^0
^0
1^9
------------------= Revise Novemtier 1. 2000
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CB5
CHRONIC TOX1C1TY TEST
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Pane
01
OLVER LABORATORIES ^^ ^
CLIENT J^lJLl2fl.aL(BBBtf-
JOB NO t^'1^-5- * EPFEFRLMUITENNTO/TO_X_I_CA_N_T__I---g_--_--_ DILUTION WATER: tiffi-Wlf^
INITIAL
DAY
1
TEST INITIATION DATE ^//3/Q/ TEST COMPLETION DATE ^^OfO}
TEST ORGANISM PHOTOPERIOD
f prc.-r\ ^/fl.?.
16-Hour Dav/8-Hour Might
LIGHT'lNTENSITY 5Q-100ft-c
CONCENTRATION OCX) f (? fY\
DAY
2
DAY
3
DAY
4
DAY
5
DAY
6
DAY
7
COMMENTS
pH D.O (mg/L) Temperature (C) Conductivity (^mhos/cm)
Hardness (mg/L as CaCOj
Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCO:,) Analyst's Initials
FINAL pH D.O (mg/L) Temperature (C) Conductivity (^mhos/cm) A-natyst's Initials
INITIAL
7^ 7?
^ Soo
'U
6^
LhiO
15
6.0
;?5 317
^J
DAY
1
1.Q '7-^ 7?
'7-^ 7^ -?-^
^5 ^^ ^t^
'^ 7,? y/o
7? -'^ T-^ 3-5 ^ 16
3 oo 30"^- ,^0-?' 3H 31^ ^
HI )OL/ /oty (?-^ ^s IOQ
6>5 6^ ^ ((70 (,0 ^
^i-J ftnO w? 5W S^^i Lmo
7^
3..?
9.^ ^1^
frr'n
'?5
^7
^
,3/,Z
//7?^
7.3 -73 7^> 7.3 3.? 3 A ^.k 0.^ ^^ ^ ^ %
331 3^0 <2)^ ^
5^ M LrtiD i^n
CONCENTRATION f 06 y j7 rr\
DAY
2
DAY
3
DAY
4
DAY
5
DAY
6
DAY 7
"'
COMMENTS
pH D.O (mg/L) Temperature (C) Conductivity (^mhos/cm) Hardness (mgn- as CaCD,)
^r
z?
^.5-
300
7 ^ 7-^ 7? 7'^
7.? ^7^ 7.? 7-^
^ ^^ ^5 ^ 3 oo ,^"?- 30-?- 3N
ZO -^
7,? 7^
?5 ?.5'
3B ^
Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCO,) Analyst's Initials
LMO ^PN
FINAL pH
~1^ 17 ^
D 0 (mg/L) Temperature (C) Conductivity (^mhos/cm)
CoO ,3^ 55 ^
m -^0^
5W ^0 Analyst's Initials
N \TEMPLATBBIOBENCH\CHrlOHIC',CHRONCHE WPO
LmD
l7 3 ^ ^^r
^^
4nQ
?/nn ?^ 5-^
73 -7-3
vo 3-^
36 ^
3^ 3?f
^f?fv' A^
73
^
^')"
,^^
L^O
irnp
7^
4-7 ^
3^
t^D
Revise November 1. 2000
Sfi
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBS
-"'"'"-" _
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_-
--___~Q"c
~^4-o--. ^-n
o^
^HSi^ _J-
- L
"
Co^npc<r\san
---^
-1
'TO
S'V^A0.'^
A. TEST FOR NORMALITY OF SURVIVAL DATA
Q-'^va^s_____
Title File
^''-'^''^I^TtCIB--l --To--xJiciiy-?
promelas Survr/al-2/13/01
Transform
ARC SINE (SQUARE ROOT(Y)
Shapiro - Wilk's TesC for Normality
D =
0 1560
W =
0 8283
Critical W W
= 0 8960 (alpha 0 01 , M = 23) = 0 92-10 (alpha = 0 d5 , M = 28)
Data FAIL normality test (alpha = 0.01) Try another transformation.
Warning
;
- The first three homogeneity tests are sensitive to non-normality
and should not be performed with this data as is
B. TEST FOR HOMOGENEITY OF VARIANCE
Title
-F-Lle.
:^f |(HS ^ Dupontl----Bj^TTooxxicicity-P GIB^^I
promelas Survival-2/13/01
Transform
AfiC 2 INS (SQUARE ROOT(Y))
Hartley's Test for Homogeneity of Variance Bartlett's Test for Homogeneity of Variance
These two tescs can not be performed because at least one group has zero variance
Data FAIL to meet homogeneity of variance assumption Additional transformations are useless
^^-^^ '^^-'yy Olver Labnrjtones Inco rpor.iti.-d 11.16 South Main Street ^SAiS Blackshurg, Virginia 2-1060
^-^W> Phniie (5401 552-5548 FAX (5.40) 552-1715
q-7
'Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
t>c^r^ fr,n^\nSiS- Co rrx ?&.<-, s^n --p S-Va-^a/r^ CirA-gA S
.j
C. STEEL'S MANY-ONE RANK TEST
Title File
DuponC-lBB|Toxi=ity-P promelas Survival-2/13/01
^--------A
Transform
A5C SINE (SQUARE ROOT(Y)
Steel's Many-One Sank Test
-
Ho Control-sTreatment
GROUP
IDENTIFICATION
TRANSFORMED MEAN
RAN-K SUM
CRIT.
V?J_,UE
SIG
DF 0.05
Ccntrcl 5 m9/L
10 mg/L 25 mg/L 50 mg/L 100 mg/L 500 mg/L
1 3713 1 3713
1335B
1 3305 1 4120 1 4120
13713
18 00
1750
16 00 20 00 20 00
18.00
10 00
1000
10 00 10 00 10 00
10.00
4 00
400
4 00
4 00
4.00
400
Critical values are 1 tailed ( k = 6
l
,,1%
Olver Laboralones [ncorporjied 1116 South M-iin Street
^ Blacksburg, Virginia ;-(06U
Plionc lS-401 552-5548 FA.X 15401 552-1715
58
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
t^O-Vc.
(\no.\^c.i'S -
_)
Cjr^fiaiv-)^,^--n
^^a.^c^cij
C-.,-.4yolS
A. TEST FOR NORMALITY OF GROWTH DATA
Title
File
Dupor^B^B^^H^^--^^--^--^ FToxicity-P
^WUMP^
^
promelas Growth-2/13/01 Transform-
Shapiro - Wi-k's Test for Normality
NO TRANSFORMATION
D W =
0 0809 0 9'U-l
Critical W = 0 8960 (alpha = 0 01 , H = 2S)
W = 0 9240 (alpha = 0 05 , N = 28)
Data PASS normality test (alpha = 0 01) Continue analysis
B. TEST
Title File
FOR HOMOGENEITY OP VARIANCE
*- > DupontjpmyToxicity-P
^P^^lA
promelas Growth-2/13/01 Transform
NO TRAMS FORMAT ION
Barclett's Test for Homogeneity of Variance
Calculated Bl statistic = 1 2700
(p-value = 0 3733)
Data PASS Bl homogeneity test at 0 01 level. Continue analysis
Critical 3 = la 8119 (alpha = o 01, dr = 6)
= 12 .5916 (alpha = 0 05, df = 6)
^^^^^^ Olvcr L-iboratones Incorporaled ^Z^^^ ll16 South Mam Street
Ss;iv^ BPhlaocnfces(b5u4r0g), 5V5i2rg-Sin5i4aS 2F.1A06X0 (540) 552-1715 ,-q
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
^)Ci.\^x. ^.QciAu'^iS- Caf-^o<<<'.';,p^ -p3 ^A-Q.^^cifd C-o^-Vfa]^
1
C. ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE OF DRY WEIGHT DATA
Title File
DupontV-M^BBBl^BT9o^xicity-P
prornelas Growth-2/13/01 Transform
NO TRANSFORMATION
ANOVA Table
SOURCE
DF
SS
MS
F
Between
6
0 0117
0 0020
0 50o5
Within (Error)
21
0 0809
0 0039
Total
27
0 0926
(p-value = 0.7965)
Critical F = 3 8117
,, = 2 5727
(alpha = 0 01, df o.21) (alpha = 0 05, df 6,21)
'Since F < Critical P FAIL TO REJECT Ho All equal (alpha = 0.05)
D. DIMNETT'S TEST
Title File
Dupon't'iW^Bfl--H --To--xiHc ity-P promTrealanssfoGrmrowth-2/13/01
NO TRANSFORMATION
Dunnett ' s Test
-
TABLE 1 OF 2
Ho Control<Treatment
GROUP
IDENTIFICATION
TRANSFORMED MEAN
MEAN CALCULATED IN ORIGINAL UNITS
T STAT
SIG
0 05
1
Control
0.4198
0 4198
2
5 mg/L
0.46B3
0.4683
-1 1053
3
10 mg/L
0.41SO
0.4160
0 0855
4
25 mg/L
0 4295
0'4295
-0.2222
5
50 mg/L
0 4415
0 4415
-0 4957
6
100 mg/L
0 3985
0 3985
0 4B43
7
500 mg/L
0 4217
0.4217
-0 0456
DunnetC critical value = 2 4SOO (1 Tailed, alpha = 0 05, df [used] = 6,20)
'^
(Actual df = 6,21)
f^-^r^f
Olvcr Ljboratnri&s Incorporated 1116 South Main Street
yy-?i^WS
Sl'";!"1'"1'!;. VirE'"'3 24060
pllnne y401 3s2-5548 ^X (s-40' 532-1715
60
9WI
----........
r.
J -.-..,, ,,.
^SL '5'tc^j.cVd C<i^-\-,^i\ S
Title File
Dupont-lrt^BrToxicity-P promelas Growth-2/13/01
.
'Ctef|ft
Transform
NO TRANSFORMATION
DunneCt's Test -
TABLE 2 OF 2
Ho Control<TreatmeniC
GROUP
IDENTIFICATION
SUM OP REPS
MIN SIG DIFF (IN ORIG UNITS)
% OF CONTROL
DIFFERENCE FROM CONTROL
1
Control
4
2
5 mg/L
4
0 1079
25 7
-0.0485
3
10 mg/L
4
0 1079
25 7
0 0038
4
25 mg/L
4
0 1079
25.7
-0 0097
5
50 iTig/L
4
0.1079
25 7
-0 0217
6
100 mg/L
4
0 1079
25 7
0 0213
7
500 mg/L
4
0 1079
25 7
-0 0020
;
INHIBITION CONCENTRATION (IC^s) ESTIMATE
Title File
Cupont|k----B Toxic ty-P " tl------N
promelas Growth-2/13/01 Transform
NO TRANSFORMATION
GPJ?
IDENTIFICATION
MEAN
SMOOTHED MEAN CONCENTRATION
1
Control
2
5 mg/L
3
10 mg/L
4
25 mg/L
5
50 mg/L
6
100 mg/L
7
500 mg/L
ICp estimate witn p = 25 is >
0 41SB 0 4583 0 4160 0 4295 0 4415 O 39B5
0.4217
500 0000
0.4440 0.4440 0 4290 0 4290
0.4290 0 4101 0 4101
0 0000 5 0000 10 0000 25 0000
50.0000 100.0000
500 0000
^/^f ^^^'5^^ OIvcr L^borjiorna Incorpornted 1116 South Main Sireet y^'SAiSt Bijcksburg, Virginia 24060
<'y"?W pllme Is'"! S^-Sa-lS F.IX (540) 552-1715
61
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCACBl
Qci.i-c l^nc^ijC,',;, - Camo^f\<,,^n "VT! rO'g.'W-io.noV C-on-pc^s
A. TEST
Title
File
FOR NORMALITY OF SURVIVAL DATA
f
^*fc
C
u
p
o
nM
'"
pBH. Tox
'flBMft
i
c
i
i
y
-
P
promelas Survival-2/13/01
Transform
ARC SINE (SQUARE
ROOT (/)
Shapiro - Milk's Test for Normality
D = W =
0 1627 0 B625
Critical W
W
= 0 3960 (alpha = 0 01 , M 28) = 0 9240 (alpha = 0 OS , N = 28)
Data FAIL normality test (alpha = 0 01) Try another transformation.
Warning
1
- The first three homogeneity tests are sensitive to non-normality
and should not be performed with this data as is
B. TEST FOR HOMOGENEITY OF VARIANCE
Title File
Dupon"tB'lfjUiIfTfotxicity-P
promelas Survival-2/13/0:1.
Transform
ARC SINE (SQUARE ROOT(Y))
Hartley's Test for Homogeneity of Variance Bartlett's Test for Homogeneity of Variance
These two tests can not ce performed because at least one group has zero variance
Data FAIL to meet homogeneity of variance assumption Additional transformations are useless-
^O^-'I^^
^"V^
^^^
i^-Xv'
Olver Laboratories Incorporated 1116 South Main Street Blackjiburg, Vu-guua 24060 _ i Phone {S4Q) 5S2-5S48 FAX (540) 552-1715
CompanySanitized.
Does not contain
TSCA CBi
OoAo. r^ncA-i.Ci.i'a- Cg.r^oo.v'.^^n -Vn rrig-'^o-nQ^ ''-o'--'V''-ri\S
C. STEEL'S MAIIY-OME RANK TEST
Title
Pile
Dupont
Tcxic.Lty-P
promelas Survival-2/13/01
Transform
ARC SINE(SQUARE ROOTiY))
GROUP
Steel's Many-One Rank Test
IDENTIFICATION
TRANSFORMED MEAN
Ho Control<Treatment
RANK SUM
CRIT VALUE
SIG
DF
0 05
Control w/ MeOH
5 mg/L 10 mg/L 25 mg/L 50 mg/L 100 mg/L 500 mg/L
1 3305 1 3713 1 3358 I 3305 1 4120 1.4120 1 3713
20 00 19 00 13 00 22 00 22 00 20 00
10 00 10 00 10 00 10 00 10 00 10 00
4 00 4 00 4 00 4 00 4 . 00 4 00
Critical values are 1 tailed ( k = 6 )
1
/f%f^
Olver Laboratories Incorporated 1116 South M-iin Streel
J^SS Blacksburg, Virginia 24060
6 3
/y-^W ^'o"11 (S-Ml) 552-554S FAX (540) 552-1715
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CB1
_______0<xVc> ^r^o^Cu3 ^s- Cci-f\c^.r\\o(^ -Vn rog-"Vnar>^\ C^fiv\s___________
A. TEST FOR NORMALITY OF GROWTH DATA
TideFile
Dupon^.tp|BH|lTJoIxicity-P
promelas Growth-2/13/01 Transform
NO TRANSFORMATION
Shapiro - Milk's Test for Normality
D =
0 0799
W =
0 9786
Critical W
W
= 0.8960 (alpha = 0 01 , N = 23)
=
0.924C
(alpha =
0 05
N =
,
28)
Daca PASS normalicy test (alpha = 0 01) Continue analysis
B. TEST FOR HOMOGENEITY OF VARIANCE
Title File
Dupontfldl^pToxicity-P promelas Growt-i-2/13/01
^f--------P
Transform
NO TRAMS FORMAT I OH
Bartlett's Test for Homogeneity of Variance
Calculated Bl statistic = 1 1843
Data PASS Bl homogeneity test at 0 01 level
(p-value = 0 9776) Continue analysis
Critical B = 16 8119 (alpha = 0 01, df = 6)
= 12 5916 (alpha = 0 05, df = 6)
.^, %
Olver Laboratories la(.orporated 1116 South Main Street
.^SS BIacksburg, Virginia 24060
f'y^'W phone ls<()> SS^SS'18 PAX (5-40) 552-1715
Company
6 4
Sanitized.
Does
not
contain
TSCA
CB1
'^cx-'rc..
^n&A'j^i.s-- Cc.nN-c><-.<-\<,sn -Vo
^^
f'0<.-TViQ.rio\ C<L^~vt)\'-
C. ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE OF DRY WEIGHT DATA
Title Flla
Dupon^fC^BMHhIH.'oIxicity-P
promelas Growch-2/13/01 Transform
.
NO TRANSFORMATION
ANOVA Table
SOURCE
Dp
SS
MS
P
Between
6
0 0131
0.0022
0 5754
Within (Error)
21
0 0799
0 0038
Total
27
0 0930
(p-value = 0 7456)
Critical F
^
= 3 8117 ==2 5727
lalpha = 0.01, df = 6,21) (alpha = 0 05, df = 6,21)
'Since F < Critical F FAIL TO REJECT Ho. All eqnal (alpha = 0 05)
D. DUMNETT'S TEST
Title File
*
Dupont<|^t^|TQxicity-P ^tt------N
promelas Growth-2/13/01 Transform
NO TRANSFORMATION
Durmett's Test - TABLE 1 OF 2
Ho - Control<;Treatment
GROUP
IDENTIFICATION
TRANSFORMED MEAN
MEAN CALCULATED IN ORIGINAL UNITS
T STAT
SIG
0 OS
1
Control w/MeOH
0 4068
2
5 mc/L
O 46B3
3
10 mg/'L
0 4160
4
25 mg/L
0 4295
5
50 mg/L
0 4415
6
100 mg/L
0 39B5
7
500 mg/L
0 4217
0 4068
0.4683 0 4160 0-4295 0.4415 0-3985 0.4217
-1 4103 -0 2121 -0 5217 -0.7963
0.1892
-0.3440
Dunnett critical value = 2 4600 (1 Tailed, alpha = 0.05, df [used] = 6,20)
(Actual df = 6,21)
^^Yt-^S^^
l,r'7^''^^f-^<f^r y^^
Olver Laboratories Incorporated
UUU16) S.loutlhi Mam Street
Blacltoburg, Virginia 24060
Phone (540) 532-S548 FAX (540) 552-1715
65
Company Sanitized.
Does not contain TSCACBI
DcL-V-a,
(\ ,-M-.\,;C,,< -l
^1'cr^ -,,,'>.> r,,^ ~G rTi'^'^id.nol U-.riT'rolS
Title File
Dupont i^B--B--Q--Tofaxitcf ity-P ^BBB^I^^^^^^'
prome-as Growth-2/13/01 Transform
MO TRANSFORMATION
DunnetC's Test
-
TABLE 2 CF 2
Ho Control<Treatmern:
GROUP
IDENTIFICATION
NUM OF REPS
MIN SIG DIFF [ IN ORIG UNITS)
% OF CONTROL
DIFFERSNCS FROM CONTROL
1
Control w/MeOH
4
2
5 mg/L
4
3
10 mg/L
4
4
25 mg/L
4
5
50 mg/L
4
6
100 mg/L
4
7
500 mg/L
4
0 1073 0 1073 0 1073 0 1073 0 1073 0 1073
26 4 26 4 26 4 26 4 26 4
26.4
-0 0615 -0 0093 -0 0228 -0 0348
0 0082
-0 0150
;
INHIBITION CONCENTRATION (lC;s) ESTIMATE
Title
File
Dupc^n^ ^f^1---^^T--^|iBc^ity-P
promelas GrowT:h-2/13/01 Transform
NO TRANSFORMATION
GRP
IDEOTIFICATICH
MSAN
SMOOTHED MEAtI CONCENTRATION
1
Control w/MeOK
0 4068
0.4375
0 0000
2
5 ni9/L
O -1683
0 4375
5.0000
3
10 mg/L
0 4160
0.4290
10.0000
4
25 mg/L
0 4295
0.4290
25.0000
5
50 mg/L
0 44:15
0.4290
50.0000
6
100 mg/L
0 3985
0.4101
100.0000
7
500 mg/L
0 4217
0 4101
500.0000
ICp estimate with p = 25 is > 500 0000
^^X-^%|/ Olver Laboratories tDCOrpor-lted
'^f^f 1116 South Main Strea Blacksburi;, Viryinu 24060
Phone (S40) 552-5548 FAX (540) 552-1713
6 6
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
APPENDIX?
CHRONIC TOXiClTY TEST DATA Ceriodaphnia dubia
67 Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
OLVER
LABORATORIES
OLVER LABORATORIES INCORPORATED ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY LABORATORY
CLIENT O^Pon^ TOXICANT/EFFLUEN
JOB NO PERMIT NO
^ un5 ^J/A
TEST SUMMAR
PAGE
OF
ACUTE TOXICITY TEST RESULTS
TEST DATEfS)
Cenodaphma
TEST CONDITIONS TEST ORGANISM AGE DILUTION WATER SOURCE AERATION
EPA-MHW OLVER LABS
continuous
TEST ACCEPTABILITY CONTROL SURVIVAL (iQO%)
Fathead Minnow
EPA-MHW OLVER LABS
continuous
-,. ..
DILUTION WATER SOURCE AERATION
CIIKONIC IOX1C11Y r EST RESULTS
Cenodaphnia
^2o-2/n;o
(-6 l^rs.
EPA-MHW OLVER LABS
continuous
CONTROL SURVIVAL (iQO%) NO OF CONTROL FEMALES
% CONTROL FEMALES WITH 3 BROODS (&60%)
loo'/
10
W
AVE NO YOUNG/SURVIVING FEMALES (;> 15)
1 Q-O
STATISTICAL RESULTS
AVE WT/SURV CONTROL (i0 25 mg)
SURVIVAL IN 100%
SURVIVAL IN HIGHEST ( Soo ^^/^ CONC
Ho/
LCso
NUMBER OF REPLICATES
i0
NUMBER OF ORGANISM/REPLICATE
l
95% C I
NORMAL DISTRIBUTION?
Vti
HOMOGENEOUS VARIANCE?
^
METHOD
NOEC METHOD
Ejnne,1-1 '5
NOEC SURVIVAL
100 "a/
NOEC REPRODUCTION/GROWTH
lo '"a/i-'"' '"'"
COMMENTS
Ifiy
Rfp^^Jhin j^ nj\<-^. np'-<
iOor^fi- QJ-A
^^A^. 5i,
R^procivM-h'tn/CrvOt-i^,
ex, noo-c-nn-,1-tinMAjs. Jo^.-A.-^^^A-tn't +o^i'LitM Tc^on^t . A S-bv.hi.-hLtJ.I^ 3jgrtifi'<p^
,
^
.
_
^
^
Cooi-cn-Vf^hbrii ^onl-nn-'^n^'Qni
Bo.'i-i.A. nn t^-
-h^- Mo&C. I i
o^Lfsfc-h'tiri biZ-lit*j<A \o
iw, o-l- -b^- 0 rr^te.a..n.n-.-.iw l\/r--((bbrr.^Tr>><<^^i<ic-^.. c<r. A
bg. ^1 3^^ <=< ^g'J i's,-^< lu T<f'^v\~^-c5
llllEMPLATe'niODEHCH'BIOAOMIIHTCSrSUMWPO
OLVER LABORATORIES INCORPORATED ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY LABORATORY
CLIENT Plkporrl-1
TOXICANT/EFFLUENT
JOB NO AoHJL
PERMIT NO
_N/^
TEST SUMMARY
PAGE
; OF
I
TEST DATE(S)
ACUTE TOXiCITY TEST RESULTS
Ceriodaphnia
Fathead Minnow
CHRONIC TOXICITY T EST RESULTS Ceriodaphiiia
2/ZO-^/o/
TEST CONDI DONS TEST ORGANISM AGE DILUTION WATER SOURCE AERATION
TEST ACCEPTABILITY CONTROL SURVIVAL (a90%)
EPA-MHW OLVER LABS
continuous
EPA-MHW OLVER LABS
continuous
TEST ORGANISM AGE DILUTION WATER
SOURCE AERATION
-^-
CONTROL SURVIVAL (a 80%) NO OF CONTROL FEMALES
% CONTROL FEMALES WITH 3 BROODS (^60%)
1-& Ins.
EPA-MHW OLVER LABS
conlinuous
lo/
(0
8o/'
AVE NO YOUNG/SURVIVING FEMALEB(s15)
15.^
STATISTICAL RESULTSSURVIVAL IN 100%
LC^
95% C I
f
METHOD
COMMENTS ->! Con-VfQ^ V>lG.\i;j- u^^ ^A^
f^tV^nO \
AVE WT/SURV CONTROL (s.O 25 mg)
SURVIVAL IN HIGHEST ( 5on ""</i) CONC NUMBER OF REPLICATES NUMBER OF ORGANISM/REPLICATE NORMAL DISTRIBUTION? HOMOGENEOUS VARIANCE? NOEC METHOD NOEC SURVIVAL NOEC REPRODUCTION/GROWTH TC-ZS; P.t^>^^>cLu.LA^Cl'>/&vo'l+t->
1-1 O/.
1 0 ;
Y.s
MO
5-^1:5 100 "^1/L.
lOo '"3/L '>Sot> "'3/1
( Soa^kL Q-^ fA>jiJyio./ia\ P-r \ \-'\'^-r '^'s- d\\^'non <^'.V^-')
inlFMI'LftlEMJIODEHCl^OlOADMIH^TESTSUMVtTD
n
OLVER
LABORATORIES
AQUATIC TOX1CITY TEST SAMPLE USE FOR STANDARD SYNTHETIC DILUTION
Client D^n-b -
Effluent/Toxicant Synlhelic Dilution Wale' Testing Requirements
'IB-Hour
40-1-lour
9G-Hour
Moderately Hard Water
Acute Cenodaphnia Test Acule Fathead Minnow Test Acute Fathead Minnow Test
fMHW)
Job Number Permit No
&o)~]a,
Page
7-Day Chronic Fathead Minnow Test -2^- ' 3-Biood Chronic Cenodapliina TesI
Olher
_________________
TEST DAY Carboy No /Identification Preparalion Dale Tune & Day of Use Age of Dilution Water"'
1
^3 2)^0 (
'^SrnltCTZ /20/(?l
' ^'J
2
3
rf3
i n o\ ll^'ga/pmZ /2l /Ol
^3^5
z|^Toi
ll^'am/Q^- /12./0]
1. dtt-^i
3 ctc^l&
-1
ffH
2. 1') o>
(|^n/fl /23/c 1 ^ dai.|4-
5^
^v
a^i'? /oi
'^/pn^/^O) ^
Sd^r
G
^7
s^/^/ ,, /
am/g^^/^/O; y
Lt* ^ ^ ^J
Alkalinity (mg/L)
(Acceptable Ranqe 60-70 mg/L)
6^
^
^
LT-
^c^
G ?
Haidness (mg/L) (Acceptable Range 80ToOmp/Ll ConduclivilY (ffmhos/cm)
pH
Total Residual Cl, (mg/L)
0 0 (mg/L)
Aeration
/DO
33>(e
^8
ND-
7 B
Continuous
100
^
^e
ND
^6
Continuous
loo
^ 1-S
ND
-i.8
Continuous
^13l?
--i <? NO
^-8
Continuous
^ol
^ 15-
-/^
ND
? ?
Continuous
n
31^ ^.0
NO
-^
Continuous
COMMENTS (1) Synthetic dilution water is prepared with laboratory deiomzed water and reaaent araue chemicals fEPA/600/i-9l/002) (2) Each batch of dilution v/aerjs not used for more than 14 davs (ollowina the preparation dale
NO = Not Detectable
Cenodaphnia dubia SURVIVAL AND
REPRODUCTION RECORD
CLIENT __L>'A{ _
PERMIT NO
W.
EFFLUENT/TOXICANT .4
DILUTION WATER PP>
-nm^"
t-'MUIUl-'cr^iuu iiCONCENTRAT10N REP
.^,,p,,^= /o3
1 (A)
Day 1
0
2(B)
0
3 (C1
0
L-on-VrO ^
4(D)
0
5(E)
0
e(F)
0
7(G)
0
B (H)
0
I 3(1) 0
10 (J)
0
0 TOTAL
Day 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CONCENTRATION
/. Survival ^0
P
J
i
-^ /
\
( ]y\t.-i^"o^
-
'S~CKI -<J>L
TOTAL
REP
1 (Al 2 (B) 3(C1
4(D) 5(E)
6(n
7|G> B(H1 9 (1) 10 (J)
Day1
0 0
(3 /X
n 0
0 0 0 0 0
0
Day 2 0
0
.--.
0 0
0
n
0 0 0
0
CONCENTRATION REP %Survival=/Q5
1 IA>
2(B)
5 "^/L-
3(C)
1 (Dl
5(E)
6 (F)
7 (Gl
S (H)
9 (I)
10 IJ)
TOTAL.
Day 1
0 0 0 0 0 D 0
0
0 0 0
^i,
Day 2 0
0
0 0
0
0 0 0 c 0 0
f^y
M \TEMPlATE1.310aENCH\CHRON^C'.COREOP.OD WPD
JOB NO 6c''75
PAGE.
ofjL
TEST ORGANISM AGE _^-~L\^-(^t^-^ 'S ^n _)
START of TEST jLl^-_AM^r_2_/_2Q./^J_
END of TEST 3'^ A M lST.L-JJ3Jj^-
Day 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
REPRODUCTION CO UNTOAY
Day 4
i-if S
5
^
Day5
& 0 C>
0
Dayfi
4 Q*~
S
^
Day 7
H
I*
^ ^
^
[n
!
1
/. 1 ^ H
S
b
H
3
^
Z9
0
S~
ft-*- .-<
0
t l
0
^1
0
12-
0
/5
41
C^-
Day3
0 0
0 0
0
0
C 0 0
REPRODUCTION COUNT/DAY
Day 4
^
5
Day5 0
0
Day6 IP
^
Day 7 .$'
3-
--
--
.--
.--
4
0
^
^
^
^
~^
6>
3
^ 0
3
5
0
^
^
C. 0
ID
L/ -7 0
0
^ 0
^
3
36' ^ 3o ^^
Day 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M.
REPRODUCTION COUNT/DAY
Day 4 5
Day5
>
Day 6
g
Day 7
H
5
0
if
^
Q
f,
^
)
?
H
C?
?
H
^
G)
1
~1
0
^ ^
lO
3
G
0
^
3^'i
5
^5
0
3^
StiJ Jg.-J
L,
h
3
b 9 ^?
^ ^
1.
^
^L^
71
TOTAL
'?
^
J7
/^ ?? /7
S.I
n
^^
asi
?o
COMMENTS TEST SOLUTION VOLUME 15ml TEST CONTAINER SIZE 30ml
FEEDING
0 1 ml T/C +
0 1 ml ALGAE/DAY
t S<AI+ ^BO^S
TOTAL
^
1^
0 '7
^3-
7 7 3^0 ?/
/^-
<43
COMMENTS
TOTAL
!1
n
1(0
n
jQ
/^
/'/
/7
^
/5
^^
5'?J
COMMENTS X = DEAD - a DIED PREVIOUSLY S/X = ? OF YOUNG PRODUCED BEFORE ADULT DIED
Hc-nca ;une ~-0 :"CO
^any Sans&ea, sggg ^ ^^.
Cenodaphnia dubia SURVIVAL AND
REPRODUCTION RECORD
CLIENT___,
PERMIT NO
^^A
_
EFFLUENT/TOXICANT.
D| I1L1 U1 1TIIIIOHNM WVVA/-.T1 E. R, E.>p..f.l, n^Lj PHOTOPE--R--IOD-' -1"6- n--r 'D"la--y/.8'OhrMNii.ghi
CONCENTRATION R'"E'"P"
./.S,,n^,=q0
1(A)
Day1
0
Day 2 0
21ICd3\
0
0
3(C)
r>
0
\0 4 (01
0
0
r^^/,
.
5(E)
D
0
6 (H
0
0
7(G)
0
0
8/(un\)
0
0
j. 9 (11 0 0
10 (Jl
0
0
TQTAl----
0
0
CONCENTRATION
/. Survivals ^0
Z'S rn^y,
~
TOTAL
REP
1 (A)
2(81 3 (C) 4(01 S!E.l
S (PI 7 (Gl B (H) 9 (11 10 (Jl
Day1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Day 2 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0
'-- JOB NO 6io)"T5
PAGE -2- arji.
TEST ORGANISM AGE ^.Z-W hfj- C^i/^-f S hf i-}
START of TEST __/'-3C _AM/l^i ^ / 't-SloT
END of TEST
3^
A.M-(Q^ -
..
' -'
Day 3
0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
R,,E--BP--RO--D--UC.--DO.-N..c-~o,u>J,N-T^/,D^A.^Y
Day 4
3
5
DayS 0
:?
Day6
/.
0
Day 7
-i1l ^
3
0
IP
//
L/ ^
1
^
S
0
b
.?
3
^
0
11
^
fc
o
^5 8
3
3
0
10
0
8li.
1^ 3
(. 0
11-
3n
3fo y~(c>
Day 3
0 c 0 0 0 0
n
0 0 0 0
RiEPRODU CT10N CO UNT/DAY
Day 4
^ ^
.5
$ 5
/
^
3
3
^ 3^
DayS 0
Q
0
0
0
^
3 A <rt
^ ^
DayS Q
0
b-
^
/, /,
^
;
^
0
1
^
DayT
/.
^
0 0 ^ 0
/,,
o/X
z
/o ^^y
TOTAL
13
/^
/^
/??
/?
19
^0
17 i^
a/
111
COMMENTS TEST SOLUTION VOLUME 15ml TEST CONTAINER
Sk= 30ml
FEEDING 0 1 ml T^C -r 0 1 ml ALGAE/DAY
TOTAL
1IS0 .
15 c!
u 1^ 1^
IH N
11
\\ 13 ^
COMMENTS
CONCENTRATION
/. Survivals 7-0'
^0 ^5/L,
TOTAL ANALYST
REP
1 (A) 2 (81
3 (0
4. (01 S (E1 6 (F1 T (Gl S (HI 9 (11 10 (J)
.
Day 1 0
0
0 0 0 0
0
0
0 0 0
y-&
REPRODUCTION COUNT/DAY
Day 2
Day 3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
----[ 0 0 5UI
0 0 0 ii-ft^-
Day 4
H 5
fc
^/
5
^
<^
^
5
^
^
'"ttr-J
DayS
^
0
0
S^-o
0 0
6 ^
5 3
3f
-r^
Day 6
^
7
^
^ 5'
0 z
0
^
0
3& .^A
Day 7
3.
5'
^
^
3
/./;<
^
-o3]/
10 1%
^ ^Pr
NATEMPlATglBIOBEMCHVCHRONIOCOREPROCWPO
TOTAL
13
11
15 1 ^
13
to
?3 ^
/^T-
n
15?5^(^
COMMENTS X = OSAO - =01ED PREVIOUSLY ?.'X=# OF ''OUNG PRODUCED BEFORE ADULT DIED
. . .-- 'n 'ni-in
77 Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCAC8J
^^ ^
O L V E R LABORATORIES
^
NO^;-f^i^ii?3^^- NT^| CLIENT
PERMIT
M^^^^^^^^^^^J
ny^2oi >ii\M,
EFFLUENT/TOX1CA
DILUTION WAT=R Epa "T)-^^
PhOTOPERIOD 16 hr Dav/a hr Night
CONCENTRATION REP
.^Mry.^l-'?^------
1 (Al
Day 1 0
Day 2
0
Day 3 D
2((0B1)
L?
.o
0
3(C)
0
0
0
4(Dl
0
0
0
\OQ "5/1- -
5 IE)
0
0
0
6(F)
0
0
0
7(G)
0
8/(Unti
0
0
i
sin
10 (J)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
0
0
0
Ceriodaphnia dubia SURVIVAL AND
REPRODUCTION RECORD
j^ !^ JOBNO ^sH5
P AGE ^ Of 5
E ST ORGANISM AC35 <-24 hf^- C^iH., - 3 IT''- )
START of TEST l 3Q AM/1@1 -3. 1 1-0 j Of
N Oof TEST
AM/> Z--
10\
REPRODUCTION COUNT/DAY
Day 4 DayS Day 6 Day?
^
5>
5
5
5
^
^
5
5
S
^
^
^
^
^
S'
(9
/Z
0 9/x
0 7^
(7 //
0
^
<9 ;0
(;
?
0
Q /y.
4 5
0
(o
^ 3
0
q
^
^y^ 0
^
TOTAL
3,9.
/'?
/<,,
^0
J7
/ '?
/ L, ^
;5 /^
na
COMMENTS TE5T SOLUTION VOLUME 15ml TEST CONTAINER SIZE 30ml
FEEDING 0 1 ml TVC 0 1 ml ALGAE/DAY
CONCENTRATION
% Survivals 40
SDL^ -^/L
REP
1 fA) 2/I(3B*) 3 1C) 4(D>
5(E) 6 (F)
7(G) 8(H)
9 (11
HL!-"
TOTAL .
Day 1
0 0 0
0 0 0
0
0 0 0 0
Day 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 n
Days 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
RiEPRODU CTION CO UNT/DAY
Day 4 Day5 Dayfi Day 7
3
0
1ij
//
7"
5
<9
/2.
5
0
'-1
L
5"
5 0/X
^
0
7
,?
3
fc 0 ?/^
5
^
3 P/X
^
$
^ t5'
0 /o/X
0 '?//
^ s ^3- 33
0 io /K /g ^
TOTAL
/)<0/'
a^
/1?
/o
^
/<, ^
^ /g
f^
(74
COMMENTS
I
CONCENTRATION /. Survivals
REP
1 (Al 2 IB) 3 (C) 4 1D1
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
REPRODLJCTION C OUNT/DA y Day 4 Day5 DayS Day 7
TOTAL
COMMENTS
<=OEW =DlED PREVIOUSLY
5 (El
6 (F1
7 |G^
8 (HI |
9 (1)
10 (Jj |
#/X = ?OF YOUNG PRODUCED BEFORE .IQULTDIED
TOTAL ANALYSI
N \TS-yPH're.E10BENCH\CHRCMIOC3R6PHOQ WPO
j[6(A | .<(?^ I-^,\J 6i-r>
Sft. td
'Company'SamKzetS. Does not contain TSCA CB!
^cv^fl J"n --0 2000
^S?
O L V E R LABORATORIES
^ CLIENT
JOB NO PERMIT NO
^(pcn
EFFLUENTH-OXICANT
DILUTION WATER.
EPS
INITIAL
CHRONIC TOX1C1TY TEST
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Paee
or ^
^
TnH^J
DAY
1
CONCENTRATION
DAY
2
DAY
3
TEST INITIATION DATE. Z-/2-0/P/
TEST COMPLETION DATE '2-h^lo I
-TrEe-Se-Tr nOoR^GAAMNIiSCMk^i/^\ n r-.Jd_r.tL,_^7Ic^T15.u. bt. i c.
PHOTOPERIOD
16-t-iQUf Dav/8-hour Niqm
LIGHT INTENSITY 50-100 rt-c
/ " i C-pp-t-ro
1 i
/
(
-
'
/
!'i;'^-'i-
f^<di^rof
\
)
DAY DAY DAY DAY
4
5
6
7
COMMENTS
pH
D 0. (mg/L) Temperature (C) Conductivity (^mhos/cm) Hardness (mg/L as CaCO,)
-j Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCOJ
Analyst's Initials FINAL
PH
D.O (mg/L) Temperature (C)
Conductivity (^imhos/cm)
Anaiysfs Initials
7.6 78
7-8 ^ 8
"
^5 ^
3^ S^b
5m SLfr
\ ^ ~i^ ^ 3?3
^
^
^ M
xs
35"3
SL6
^ S :? 8 -7 ^ ^0 -{ e
^s ^S 1-? ^^ ^
^-5
TL5
33L. 3l5
^5 ^5 a? 31$ 3 i5 ^??
SLft ^lA Se-^ S-^ 6L&
^ :?-
^-T-
7.'5 ^-6
^S as
S^lH 3^
5^b j^rJ
^
1,D A^ 39^
^^
:? I.
L-^ 15
33'i-
6/-a.
-^-u
L.X ^^
^
^
INITIAL
DAY
1
CONCENTRATION
LooTro
DAY
2
DAY
3
DAY
4
DAY
5
DAY
6
DAY 7
COMMENTS
PH
D 0. (mg/L) Temperature (C) Conductivity (^mhos/cm) Hardness (mg7L as CaCO,) Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCO;) Analyst's Initials
FINAL pH D.O (mg/L) Temperature (C) Conductivity (^mhos/cm) Analyst's Initials
Z8
78
2-5
3^
(00
^ ^
^ ^
^f-M ^5-
383
aLfi
^7S ^l ?
15"
3^L
100
u^
&(J>
^8 ^-8
2.5"
53L. |oo 1.^ ^.&
^
^?
A?
3l?
^<Z ^f.Z
.!:(-&
-7^
7'?
^6
315
^
Lp'9.
S"^
?0 1 ? 7? - 1-0'
^5 a-5'
3^ 3l?
^3- /DO
^
LO
5/Zfv SUS
+ D-te -Yr^-.LnWi
i'-'&<ci-f<Li\0^ 3M
Tt ^ ^ T.T 7.^ ^.^
^-l,
1^ ^2 ^
""?.o i,^ L-^l
I? 25' 3^ ^
35 ^
3^ 3?^
3^^ w 3^- 33^
^Lfl-
5LA -r^N ^eiJ 6L&
^fr
74
^=======J Revise Novemter 1 2000
^ 3 ^ O L V E R LABORATORIES
CLIENT
JOB NO
-frnl-l
PERMIT NO
EFFLUENT/TOXICANT
DILUTION WATER:
INITIAL
CHRONIC TOXiCITY TEST
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
pase "z- o f _H
DAY
1
d-
DAY
2
DAY
3
TEST INITIATION DATE
'i-JT-oj o)
TEST COMPLETION DATE a- 7?? /oj
TEST ORGANISM (Vnodcphn'ia rl/,hi(^
PHOTOPER10D
15-Kour Dav/9-Hour Night
LIGHT INTENSITY 50-100fl-c
to ^'a/t-
DAY
4
DAY
5
DAY
6
DAY
7
COMMENTS
pH D.O. (mg/L) Temperature (C) Conductivity (/-icnh os/cm)
Hardness (mg/L as CaCOj Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCOj Analyst's'Initials
FINAL pH D.O. (mg/L) Temperature (C) Conductivity (^mhos/cm) A-nalyst's Initials
7.6
-7-8
^5
3^
5m
^ ^
~\ ^ ^
3^
SLB
^ s 1 ?
I?
3.SL,
SL&
I "i ^ 4 ^5
35^
5U!>
^ ? 1 ? -LI ^.0 1 2
^ ^
:? ? -7 S U
^ ?
^? ^ A5 A5 0')
3^ 3l? b\6 315 3lS
5L&- SLfi^ ^'rlJ ^r^ .u6
=1 ^ -7^ -7-^ ^ (/ T^
'^ :! '
") ^ '?
.o
(, S
(/-']
^
^
35" a?
31 ? w 391 322 33?
^A 5^ ,S^ &LA ^Lf>-
INITIAL
DAY
1
CONCENTRATION __5_/r"3/L_
DAY
2
DAY
3
DAY
4
DAY
5
DAY
6
DAY 7
COMMENTS
pH
D 0. (mg/L) Temperature (C) Conductivity (^mhos/cm) Tiardness (mgTL as CaCOJ
1-8
~'-S
2-5 3^<o
^? S' ^ s
^
33- L,
^ ^) ? ^.f ^0
To1 1 ? 7.? 1.^
2-S
3.S- 3^ ^5
33L 3l ? 3i$ 315
-\ S
^8
X5'
3US'
Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCOs) Analyst's Initials
^n^
iLb SL6 -SLA- ^^J Sr^ 516
FINAL pH
1 1 ~\ ^
D 0 (mg/L)
1 ^
^ ^
Temperature (C) Conductivity (,-mhos/cm)
^r
3S"^
IS"
^53
Analyst's Initials
5i& ^(A
H \TEMPl.-i,TBBIOBENCH'.CliRON]C.C.-lRONCHe WD
T- ^ -^ '
^ W
SL&
-7.S 7,g :] <- 7 l-
-7,0 "1,0 L ? ^/-f
^5 ^5 7? 3.S" 346 3^1 33^ 33?
W ^fJ ,^A- SL^
75 Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
Revise Novernber 1 2000
CHRONIC TOX1CITY TEST
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Pass ^> of ^
O L V E R LABORATORIES
CLIENT JOB NO PERMIT NO
EFFLUENT/TO_X_ICANT
DILUTION WATER.
INITIAL
pH D 0 (mg/L) Temperature (C) Conductivity (^mhos/cm) Hardness (mg/L as CaCOJ
DAY
1
7.6 7-8
^5
3^
a
;-^^-//. TEST INITIATION DATE. ^-/2-0/oi
TEST COMPLETION DATE- i /J?/o<
TEST DR(-;ANISM r',n0fjnnh^o. cjufan,
PHOTOPERIOD
16-Hour Dav/8-Hour Night
LIGHT INTENSITY _50-100ft-c
CONCENTRATION 50 ^7l_
DAY
2
DAY
3
DAY
4
DAY
5
DAY
6
1 ^ s l-s 1 S 7^
? ^
^
a' ^ -//-
-7S
^ ^'? ^? ^? 2,5 ^6 ^5
331^ 331, 31? 3i6 3^
DAY
7
^8 1
;?-^
3-'3
32S-
COMMENTS
Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCOj
Analyst's Initials
5/n
SL6
5LA 5U^ ^F^ JP^ 5LSY
FINAL pH
0.0. (mg/L)
Temperature (C) Conductivity (^mhos/cm) Analyst's Initials
^ ^ 3
^
3.8^ ^L&
^
^ 4
IS
^5,
^
T^
T1
?.? 3-=)t/
SU^
^.3
(, J
^^
3V? W
7-?
1-0 ^5 355 ^r^
^ i-
^ :!
3? 33^ ^Lft
^ IP
^ ?
2?
33"!-
$^-
INITIAL
DAY
1
CONCENTRATION
2.5 rn^ /1
DAY
2
DAY
3
DAY
4
DAY
5
DAY
6
DAY 7
COMMENTS
pH
0.0 (mg/L)
Temperature (C) Conductivity [urnhos/cm) 'Hardness (mgTL as CaCO,)
1-8
7-S
^5
3^
:? 0'
-\ 8
IS
33.1-,
^^
1-8
3.5
33 L,
:?-^ -) c!
;! S 7.S
IS- ^?
y.o ZB
ol^
^?-? ^i? ^5"
315 Bi5 3i^ S3.S"
Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCOj
Analyst's Initials
^m SL&
FINAL pH D 0. (mg/L) Temperature ("C)
^
q M
^-5-
^ ^
"I "1
15
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
3&^ 358
Analyst's Initials
^
6L&-
N-\TEMPLATcl610BeNCH\CHRCNlC.ChP.CNCHE.WPQ
5L& ^l.^ ^^ J-^
^ ? ^.^ '7,? :) i.
:? 1 -7.a- ~7,0 U 1
?.^ ?5 ^^ 7.5
^-^^ 34^ W 330
6L& ^^rJ 5^ 5^>
76
A<-6
l
^ ^
L-S z5 3MI
5LA
Revise November 1 2000
i- Doss "of confepn TSCA CBi
CHRONIC TOX1C1TY TEST
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Pae
of ^
INITIAL
pH
0.0. (mg/L)
Temperature (C) Conductivity (^imhos/cm) Hardness (rng/L as CaCO^)
Alkalinity fmg/Las CaCOJ
Analyst's Initials FINAL
pH D.O. (mg/L) Temperature (C) Conductivity (^mhos/cm) Analyst's Initials
INrriAL
DAY
1
7.8
7-8
^5
3^
%
(/"i
5rr>
DAY
2
"?-?
IS
as
33(/
')(,
L'-l
^
DAY
3
^^
^ ?
Si
331/
^1'
^
6LA
DAY
4
^4-?^ ^/2?/0< TEST INITIATION DATE
j
-
-
TEST COMPLETION DATE
TEST ORGANISM /VncrhpnmG.rincuc.
"HOTOPERlOC
16-Hoiir Dav/8-Hour Night
LIGHT INTENSITY 50-100rt-c
5 00 ^^IL.
DAY
5
DAY
6
DAY
7
COMMENTS
^ S ^ 2 ^LS 3lb
f0^
(o^ AA/
-) '1 ?i.Q
'/-? ^^
.1$ ^7
^^ 3i5
h ^ lo^ ^4 G)^
^^J, 5^
^ ^-S
]LS"
^
i^ (DO
^
led
SLIV
hi S5/.-J
+
1i ^t
bol-'-- +f'^tLnl=< 'iiCcK-.-ti.M, 4
^
^
=1-? -7.3 '/7 :? I/
~\ Z ^4 (. 1 '7.0 Y-Lo L ^
^.s 1$ ^? ^
^^ 7.^
3^ ^? 3^ 5 3^(. ^n 52.0
,U& ^(^ ^Lfr 5N ^r^ 5Lfr
DAY
1
CONCENTRATION
DAY
2
DAY
3
DAY
4
/i^'0 ^a/t-
DAY
5
DAY
6
^ t.
to.T55-
^2.2 ,->L^
DAY 7
COMMENTS
pH D.O (mg/L) Temperature (C) Conductivity (^mhos/cm) Tiardness (mg7T- as CaCO,)
1-8
~f-8
2-5
3^
-7? :??
2-?
SSL
1-& ^ 8 ^
3,31-
7-? 7.<:?
^S -7<?
?,0
1^
l' ^5 ^5
li^ 316 3i^
Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCOj
Analyst's Initials
^
5Lft
FINAL
pH
-1 ^ ^^
D.O (mg/L)
~] 3 ^ H
Temperature (C) Conductivity (^mhos/cm)
"t5
I?
34? 3LZ
Analyst's Initials
ALA
^LA-
N ffEMPLATBBIOBeNCHXCHRCNIC'.CHRONCHE WPO
&LA 5Lfc ^^ 5/ZA/
^-? -7.4
^ 0 ^.0 ^ ^
3^2. 343
SL^- 5tJ
7-)
G,^
^
3^ l^
^ ^
L, L.
??
3^
&L^
77
Comply S-ar-Ac-;
?-^
^ ^
a?
S'x5'
5L6
^-L. ^-^ 2?
3^
^>-
Revise November 1. 2000
DoA&IXnc^S^- Cc.-npft^on -'IT? Tl-la- T^.jita.^ Ccn^t
A. FISHER'S EXACT TEST FOR THE DETERMINATION OP SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES IN TEST ORGANISM MORTALITY
Fisher's Exact Test NUMBER OF
IDENTIFICATION
CONTROL
5 mg/L
;
TOTAL
ALIVE
10 10 20
DEAD
0 0 0
TOTAL ANIM?-LS 10 10 20
Critical Fisher's value (10,10,10) (alphaaO 05) is 6 0 b value is 10 Since b is greater than 6 0 there is no significant difference between CONTROL and TREATMENT at the 0 05 level
Fisher's Exact Test NUMBER OP
IDENTIFICATION
CONTROL 10 mg/L
TOTAL
ALIVE
DEAD
10
0
9 1 19
1
TOTAL ANIMALS 10 10 20
Critical Fisher's value i'10,10,!C) (alpha=0 05) is 6 0 b value is 9 Since b is greater than 6 0 there is no significant difference between CONTROL and TREATMENT at the 0 05 level
N^X'^%/ ^^^-/y$
^
^^V
Olver Laburatunes Incorporated 1116 Souill M.iin Sireet Bla<.ksburi;, Virginja 2-1060
phaM (540) SS2-33-*5 t^X (540) 552-1713
Company Sanitized.
78 Does
not contain
TSCA GBI
l^oAtA ^^g-\^5iS-CaiT.pft<,'\,^^-VD'I^J.L. 54<AnAo.if^ Con^oi
Fisher's Exact Test NUMBER OF
IDENTIFICATION
CONTROL 25 rng/L
ALIVE
10
9
DEAD
TOTAL ANIMALS
10 10
TOTAL
19
20
Critical Fisher'3 value (l0,10,"-0; (alpha=0 05) is 6 0 b value is 9 Since b is greater than S 0 C-iere is no significant difference between CONTROL and TREATMENT at the 0 05 level
Fisher's Exact Test NUMBER OF
IDENTIFICATION
ALIVE
DEAD
TOTAL ANIMALS
CONTROL
10
10
50 m9/L
10
TOTAL
17
20
Critical Fisher's value (10,13,10) (alpha=0 05) is 5 0 b value is 7 Since b is 9reater than 6 0 there is no significant difference
between CONTROL snd TREATMENT at the 0 05 level
r^f$.
^y-5A^S^,
Oh'er L^boraloritis Incorporjtcd
lllfi Sumh Main Sired
Bl-icksburg, Virginia 2^060 Phone (3-10) 552-5S-18 FAX {540) S52.1715
Company
79 Sanitized.
Does
not
contain
TSCA CBI
t>\-\q ^ncA'-y5^_ Carr^Q.<s5.;i/-i % 't^-a- '^AevM^o/A Con-V^I
Fisher's Exact Test NUMBER OP
IDENTIFICATION
CONTROL
1
100 mg/L
TOTAL
ALIVE
DEAD
10
0
7 3 17
3
TOTAL ANIMALS 10 10 20
Critical Fisher's value (10,10,10) (alpha=0 05) is 6 0 b value is 7 Since b is greater than 6 0 there is no significant difference between CONTROL and TREATMENT at the 0 OS level
Fisher's Exact Test NUMBER OF
IDENTIFICATION
ALIVE
DEAD
TOTAL ANIMALS
CONTROL
10
0
10
500 mg/L
4
o
10
TOTAL
14
6
'* 20
Critical Fisher's value (10,10,10) (alpha=0 05) is 6 0 b value is 4 Since b is less than or equal to 6 0 there is a significant difference between CONTROL and TR3ATMENT at the 0.05 level.
^^^^y^r
T^^y^
$^'S^
-^^'L^A^V-
Olver Laboratories Incorporated
1116 South Main Street Bl^cksburi;. Virginia 24060
M-,_- ic <m c^ cs <Q civ .elm
;^ i^is Company
bU
Sanitized.
Does not contain TSCA CBl
t)c<V^ r^no\sS>;i- Ca/no&tN'Son ^ro '^a- S-V^rn\(yA C^n-'n^l ----------------^-------------,--
GROUP
Summary or Fisher's Exact Tests
IDENTIFICATION
NUMBER EXPOSED
NUMBER DEAD
CONTROL
10
5 mg/L
10
10 (ng/L
10
25 mg/L
10
50 mg/L
10
100 mg/L
10
500 mg/L
10
SIG 0.05
^/. Olver Laboratories Incorporated
^y^ 1116 South M.iin Streel
^ Bl-ickiburg, Virginia 24060
81
Phone (S-<0) 552-554S FAX (54U) 552-1715
Company SanHized. Does not contain TSCA CB<
Qo>V<\ kna^b^- O^P'-fi'So^-i "^ '\V^t- ty^nAcMiA C^-Vrol
B. CHI-SQUARE TEST FOR NORMALITY OF DATA
Title File.
Dupon
_Toxicity-C dubia Chronic-2/20/01 Transform-
Chi-Square Test for Normality
NO TRANSFORMATION
INTERVAL
EXPECTED OBSERVED
<-1 5
4 0200
4
Actual and Expected Frequencies
-1 5 to <;-0 S
-0 5 to 0 5
14 5200 14
22.9200
27
s.0.5 Co 1 5
14 5200 12 .
>1 5
4. 0200
3
Chi-Square = 1 ,412
^Critical Chi-Square
= 13 277 = 9 488
(p-value = O B370)
(alpha = 0.01 , df = 4) (alpha = 0.05 , df 4)
Data PASS normality test (alpha = 0 01) Continue analysis
C. TEST FOR HOMOGENEITY OF VARIANCE
-Title File
DupontyJUJ T^xicity-C dubia Chronic-2/20/01
^^^HHI
Transform
NO TRANSFORMATION
Bartletc's Test for Homogeneity of Variance
Calculated 31 statistic = 11 0373
(p-value = 0 0506)
Data PASS Bl homogeneity test at 0 01 level Continue analysis
Critical B = 15 0863 (alpha = 0 01, df = 5)
= 11 0705 (alpha = 0 05, df = 5)
^^^^^$ ^^-^y?
__ .i,SS
l^^NV
OIver Ljboralonei Incorporated 1116 South Main Street Blacksburg, Virginia 2-4060 pllo"e (s4()) 352-554S FAX (5.10) 552-171S
Company
82 Sanitized.
Does
not contain
TSCA
CBI
J^-V^
^^cils^^- C^rAfi^<\'^on -^-D 'IV^a. ')
D. SUMMARY STATISTICS ON REPRODUCTION DATA
Title File
^S. Cu' ponti----^ To-Kicity~ -C ^--------A
dubia Chronic-2/20/01 Transform
5'^oAa^d Cor^o^
-MC TRANSFORMATION
Summary Statistics on Data
TABLE 1 of :
GRP IDENTIFICATION
H
1
Control 10
2
5 mg/L 10
3
10 mg/L 10
4
25 mg/L 10
5
50 mg/L 10
6
100 mg/L 10
MIN
14 0000 15 0000 13.0000
9 0000 10 0000
8.0000
MA;(
22 0000
19.0000 21.0000 19 0000
23 0000
22.0000
MEAN
13 0000 16 6000 17.1000 13 9000 15-2000 17.3000
Title
Fll'e
Duponn------H. Toxicity-C dubia Chronic-2/20/01
fjpBffl
Transform
HO TRANSFORMATION
Summary Statistics on Data
TABLE 2 of 2
GRP IDENTIFICATION
1
Control
2
5 mg/L
3
10 mg/L
4,
25 mg/L
5
50 mg/L
6
100 mg/L
VARIANCE
7 7778 1 3778 6 7667 10 3222 11 9556 14 8444
SD
2 7889 1.1738
2.6013 3.2128 3.4577 3.8528
SEM
0 8819 0.3712 0.8226 1.0160 1.0934 1.2184
C V
t
15 4937
7 Q710
15.2122 23 1138 22 7479 22 4003
^
(^^
v\v</y ""^^i^
O"'lve~ r L--jbo--ra-t--on-a- I--nc-o-rrp--ora-t--ed 1116 South MMJjmin Street
<%5?\S\ Blacksburg, Virginia 24060
3
'W^W Pt1""
(S-10)
552-5548
FAX
(540)
"
552-1715
Company Sanitized.
Does
not
contain
TSCA
CB1
r t^a.Yt^ (\nc.\>j<<>Cs- CQ n\p^<\'^on ~rc HTSZ. -S-Ta^a^
E. ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE OF REPRODUCTION DATA
Title File
r(^ Ducontt-------- Toxicitv* -C ^1^4^--r ----f--k )]
dubia Chronic-2/20/01 Transform
NO TRANSFORMATION
AHOVA Table
SOURCE
DF
SS
MS
F
Between
5
113 9333
22 7867
2 5775
Wir.nm (Error)
54
477 4000
B- 8407
Total
59
531 3333
(p-value = 0 0366)
Critical F
1
= 3 3769 = 2 3861
(alpha == 0 01, d = 5,54) (alpha == 0 05, df = 5,54)
Since F > CriC-cal F RSJECT Ho All equal (alpha = 0 05)
F, DUNNETT'S TEST
Title.
^sa-3 OupoinilBBI- Toxicicy-C
dub-La Chronic-2/20/01 Transform.
MO TRAHSFORMATION
Dunnett's Test - TABLE 1 OF 2
Ho Control<Treatment
GROUP
IDENTIFICATION
TEAiNSFORMED MEAN
MEAN CALCULATED IN ORIGINAL UNITS
T STAT
SIG 0 05
1
Control
18 .0000
18 0000
2
5 mg/L
15 6000
16 6000
1 0529
3
10 mg/L
1'7 1000
17.1000
0 6768
4
25 mg/L
13 9000
13 9000
3 0834 *
5
0 mg/L
15 2000
15 2000
2 1057
6
100 mg/L
17 2000
17 2000
0 5016
Dunnecc critical value = 2 3100
(1 Tailed, alpha = 0 05 , df [used] = 5,40) (Actual^d = 5,54)
^^<^-^^^
^/^^\^\<f
'yy'^W
Olver Laboratories Incorporated
I'll.6 South Main Sireet
Black5burg, Virgimj 24060
pli"e (540) 55^-55-IS F-^X (5^0) 552-1715
84
Company Sanitized.
Does
not contain
TSCA CB1
t>ojrQ ^DcA^S^-i _ Cgjrtvpcn-'.'So A -^o '^J- S^^O-CCi ^0 '-T^ \
Title File
Dupont[riR Tsxicity-C.
^'B------ft
'^^^t
DunneCt' s Test -
TAELS
dubia Chrcnic-2/20/01 Transfo'-m-
NO TRANSFORMATION
2 OF 2
Ho-Control<Treatment
GROUP
IDENTIFICATION
Md OF
REPS
M;N SIG DIFF (IN ORIG UNITS)
s OF CONTROL
DIFFSRENC2 FROM CONTROL
1
Conrrol
10
"t
5 mg/L
10
3 0716
17 1
1 4000
3
10 mg/L
10
3.0716
17 1
0 9000
I
25 mg/L
10
3.0715
17 1
4 1000
5
50 ing/L
10
3 0716
17.1
2 8000
6
100 mg/'L
10
3 0716
17.1
0 8000
G. INHIBITION CONCENTRATION ESTIMATE
Titl^. File
GRP
Dupont -Sonyl Toxicity-C zoncenc
I3ENTIFICA.TION
dubia Chronic-2/20/01 Transform.
NO TRANSFORMATION
MEAM
SMOOTHED MEAN CONCENTRATION
1
Control
18 0000
18.0000
0 0000
2
5 mg/L
16 6000
16.8500
5.0000
3
10 nig/I-,
17 1000
16.8500
10.0000
4
25 mg/L
13.9000
15.S250
25 0000
5
50 mg/L,
15.2000
15 9250
50 0000
6
100 mg/L
17 2000
15 9250
100 0000
7
500 mg/L
17 4000
15-9250
500 0000
ICp es cimata with p = 25 is > 500 0000
^
^,,'%_
.^^k -^yXv^
OIvcr Ljborjtorics (nLorporaled
1.116 South Mjm Sirecl
BIacksburg, Virginia Z4060 Phone (540) 552-35'IS FAX (540) 552-1715
85 Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
DCJ-VG. r^neAu.SiS -- CarrvQg.n.snn V? Cc^-Vyofe uriV -ci^.^ p~)g-yoa.'^lJ\(''^0':'-"')
A. FISHER'S EXACT TEST FOR THE DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANT
DIFFERENCES IN TEST ORGANISM MORTALITY
Fisher's Exact Test NUMBER OF
IDENTIFICATION
DEAD
CONTROL w/MeOH 5 mg/L
ALIVE
9
10
TOTAL. ANIMALS
10 10
TOTAL
19
20
Critical Fisher's value (10,10,1) (alpha=0.05) is negative no significant difference
b value is 0
Fisher's Exact Test NUMBER OF
IDENTIFICATION
ALIVE
CONTROL w/MeOH 10 cng/L
DEAD
TOTAL ANIMALS
10 10
TOTAL
18
20
Critical Fisher's value (10,10,9)
(alpha=0.05)
is
4 0 .
.
b value .-s 9
Since b is greater than 4 0 there is no signj-ficaa.t difference
between CONTROL and TREATMENT at the 0.05 level
f^^^^i
^^^
OIvcr Laboratories Incurporjted 1116 South Main Street
BpIhac"k:snb^urog6, )sVisrg^ini^a -24F06T0 x^ .52-1^
^^^w^. Does not contain TSCA CBI
T^oA^- I^Q'-V^SvS- Car!\pc.<^^^, -Vo Cor,-Vx;\<> L.^.o SoJ^^L c-A^o Yng-'H-^
Fisher's Exact Test NUMBER OF
IDENTIFICATION
CONTROL w/MeOH 25 mg/L
TOTAL
ALIVE
DEAD
99 11 16
2
TOTAL AMIMALS
10 10
'
20
Critical Fisher's val-e (10,10,9) ialpha=0 05) is 4.0 b value is 9 Since b is greater tnan 4 0 there is no significant difference between CONTROL and TREATMENT at the 0 05 level
Fisher's Exact Test NUMBER OF
IDENTIFICATION
ALIVE
DEAD
TOTAL ANIMALS
CONTROL w/MeOH
9
1
10
50 mg/L
.7
3
10
, 1 5 - 1 TOTAL
20
Critical Fisher's value (10,10,9) (alpha=0 05) is 4 0. b value s 7 Since b is greater than 4 0 there is no significant difference between CONTROL and TREATMENT at the 0 05 level
^i^i^-^^^
^^-y% ^W^iS
Olver l-iboratories Incorporated 1116 Soutli Main Street S13'21"''"1^, Virginia 24060 Phone (540) 552-55-4S FAX 1540) 552-1715
ComplSyanded. Does not contain TSCAOBi
-- - - - -- ^ -- T)o-Vg- ^noA^'s- Comptx-nso ri V<= Carf^^ L^'-T^ 'Sao^- o-cHjjA mi.!r^Q.^o\
Fisher's Exact Test NUMBER OF
IDENTIFICATION
ALIVE
DEAD
CONTROL w/MeOH
9
1
7 3 100 ma/L
;
TOTAL
16
4
TOTAL ANIMALS 10 10 20
Cnc-cal Fisher's vslue (10,10,9) (alpha=0 05) is 4 0 b value is 7. Since b is greacer than 4 0 there is no significant difference between CONTROL and TREATMENT at the 0.05 level.
Fisher's Exact Test NUMBER OF
IDENTIFICATION
ALIVE
DEAD
TOTAL ANIMALS
CONTROL w/MeOH
9
1
10
4 6 500 mg/L
10
TOTAL
13
7
20
Critical Fisher's value (10,10,9) (alpha=0 05) is 4.0. b value is 4. Since b is less than or ecrual to 4 0 there is a significant difference between CONTROL and TREATMENT at the 0.05 level.
XSS-5i%^
^^^^^r
^A,
^'y^'
Olver Laboratories Incorporaled 1116 South Main Siretl
BPhlaocnletib(5u4r0g), 5V5i2r-g5i5n-i1a8 2F^A06X0 (540) 552-1715 88
Company Sanitized.
Does
not contain TSCA CB1
'Do.V^. ^-n^W^S-Corner (^0^1 Vo rc.^f:Vm\ ^"V^ S'oo-^L ci-cS^-gcil T^.g.-^\-gt..-^o\
GaOUP
Suinmary of ?isher's Sx.a.ci Tests
IDENT;FICAT;ON
NT3MBER
EXPOSED
NtTMBER DEAD
CONTROL w/MeOH 10
5 m9/L
10
10 ms/L
10
25 mg/L
10
50 mg/L
10
100 mg/L
10
500 mg/L
10
SIG 0 05
Olver Laboratories Incorporated 1116 SouUi Main SirEtt Blacksburg, Virginia 24060 Phone (5'40) 5S2-5548 FAX (5-10) 552-1715
g 9
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
______OoA-0- P-i^o-l^SO _ Camoo.o'^,^ ^ro Cfln\r\ V^V^- 5oo ^<-H- O.^A'Stj me.-^nQ.oo^
B. CHI-SQUARE TEST FOR NORMALITY OF DATA
Title File
Dupor-t-a----^i Toxicity-C dunia Chronic-2/20/01
=cer
Transform
SO TPANSFORMATION
Chi-Square Test for Normality
INTERVAL
EXPECTED OBSERVED
<-1 5
4 0200
5
Actual and Expected Frequencies
-1 5 to <-0.5
-0 5 to 0 S
14 5200 13
22 9200
25
>0 5 Co 1 5
14 5200 11
>1 5
4 0200
3
Chi-Square = 2 6361
, Critical Chi-Square
= 13 277 9 488
(p-value = 0 6204)
(alpha = 0 01 . df = 4) (alpha = 0 05 , df = 4)
Data PASS normality test (alpha = 0 01) Continue analysis
C. TEST FOR HOMOGENEITY OF VARIANCE
Title ' , DupontMpBB(|Toxicity-C
File
seer
dubia Chronic-2/20/01 Transform
NO TRANSFORMATION
Bartletc's Test fcr Homo9eneity of Variance
Calculated Bl statistic = 20 1697 Data FAIL Bl homogeneity test at 0 01 level
(p-value = 0 0012) Try another transformation
Critical B = 15 0863 (alpha = 0 01, d = a)
= 11 0705 (alpha = 0.05, df = 5)
^^^-'^y^
'^^^
%?\^S
^y"5%V
Olver Laboratories Incorporated
1116 South Main Street
s10'*"1""^. ''^e'"" ^i^o
P110"6 t540! 532-55-48 FAX (540) 552-1715
9 0
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBS
t>3.-V&. \r].^-<ss- Q.mo&.^a^, -Vo Cs"n^\S ^wV 5ao -u.^- <s.AA(A rrut-rUa.no^
D. SUMMARY STATISTICS ON REPRODUCTION DATA
Title File
3upont-flH^ Toxicity-C dubia Chronic-2/20/01
^^~cer
Transform
NO TP^ANSFORMATION
Summary Statisc-cs on Data
TABLE 1 of 2
GRP IDENTIFICATION
N
1 Control w/MeOH 10
2
5 mg/L 10
3
10 mg/L 10
4
25 mg/L 10
5
50 mg/L 10
6
100 mg/L 10
MIN
0 0000 15 0000 13 0000
9.0000 10 0000
8.0000
MAX
22 0000 19 0000 21 0000 19 0000 23 0000 22.0000
MEAN
14 3000 16.SOQO 17 1000 13 9000 15 2000 17 2000
Title. File
Duponf^^ Toxicity-C. dubia Cbronic-2/20/01
^
'?cer
Transform:
NO TP-ANS FORMATION
Summary Statistics on Data
TABLE 2 of 2
GRP IDENTIFICATION
1 Control w/MeOH
2
5 mg/L
3
10 mg/L
4 .
25 mg/L
5'
50 mg/L
6
100 mg/L
VARIANCE
36 S778 1 3778 6 7667
10.3222
11 955S 14 8444
3D
6 0562 1 1738
.
2 6013 3.212B
3.4577 3 8528
SEM
1 9151 0.3712 0.8226 1 0160 1.0934 1 2184
C V
%
42.3512 7 0710
15.2122 23-1138 22.7479 22.4003
&
--
f^
A<
^^W
Olver L^boraioris.s Incorpor.iled 1116 South Main Street Blacksburg, Viri.'mi.i ZW6Q
ptlolle 1540) "^-"<s FAX {540) 552-1715
91
Company
Sanitized.
Does
not contain
TSCA CBl
DoVa- ^noA^s^ Ca^p<w5,&^ -Vo CoV>-As '^r^ Spa ^.L c^Ago myV^a/iQ'
E . STEEL / S MANY-ONE RANK TES3T
Title. File
r
\
tXiponig^ml Toxicity-C
scsr
dubia Chroni C-2/20/01 Transfonn
N0 TRANSFORMATION
Steel's Many-One Sank Test
Ho Control<sTreac-nent
GROUP
IDENTIFICATION
MEAM IN . ORIGINAL UNITS
RANK SUM
CRIT
VALUE
SIG
DF
0 05
1
Control w/MeOH
14 3000
2
5 mg/L
16.6000
119 00
75 00 10.00
3
10- mg/L
17 1000
121 00
75 00 10 00
4
25 ing/L
13.9000
96 00
75 00 10 00
5
50 mg/L
15 2000
104 50
75. 00 10 .00
5
100 mg/L
17.2000
122 00
75 00 10 -00
Critical values are 1 nailed ( k = 5 )
A
F
.
INHIB 1 TION CONCENTRATION ESTIMATE
Title File
E
U
P
O
n
t1*
B-
B
>
B^^
Toxicny-C
zcenc
dubia Chroni C-2/20/01 Transform :
N0 TRANS FORMAT I ON
GRP
IDENTIFICATION
MEAM
SMOOTHED MEAN CONCENTRATION
. 1 Control w/MeOH 14.4000 16 0333 0 0000
2
5 mg/L
16.6000
IS 0333
5 0000
3
10 mg/L
17 1000
16 0333
10 0000
4
25 mg/L
13 9000
15.9250
25.0000
5,
50 rog/L
15.2000
15 9250
50.0000
0
100 mg/L
17.2000
15.9250
100 0000
7
500 mg/L
17 4000
15 9250
500.0000
1C? estim ate with p = 25 is > 500.0000
OIver Laburatonra [Dcorporjicd 1116 Soutli Main Street Blacksburg, Virginia 24060 Phone (540) 552-55-JS FAX (540) 552-1715
92 "Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBi
APPENDIX 8 ACUTE REFERENCE TOXICITY TEST DATA
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CB1
OLVER
LABORATORIES
OLVER
LABORATORIES
REFERENCE T DATA SUMM PAGE __
TESTING MONTH: _. J^nuAyU 2-OQl
REFERENCE TOXICANT: 5o^i'u^ CLtilori'A.^
ACUTE TOXIC1TY TEST RESULTS
'
>..
TEST DATEfS)
TEST CONDITIONS TEST ORGANISM AGE DILUTION WATER ' SOURCE AERATION
Certodaphnia
l/ic.- l/iilol
Fathead Minnow
l/H-'/l^lo/
< 7.4Viu^ EPA-MHW
OLVER LABS
Continuous
1 J^.y EPA-MHW OLVER LABS
Continuous
CHRONIC TOXIC1TY TEST RESUL ^ Cerlodaph
TEST ORGANISM AGE DILUTION WATER
SOURCE AERATION
EPA-MH OIVER LA
continuo
TEST ACCEPTABILITY CONTROL SURVIVAL (&90%)
loo'/,
Ion'/.
CONTROL SURVIVAL (s80%) NO OF CONTROL FEMALES
% CONTROL FEMALES WITH 3 BROODS (s60%)
AVE NO YOUNG/SURVIVING FEMALES (&15)
STATISTICAL RESULTS SURVIVAL IN 100%
f~
LCso
95% C I METHOD
o'/.
o'/
2.6 3/L
S.3) S/L
2.Z - Z-B 3/L 4.^ -<..i a/L
5p(rmtL-i-htt<^>,
P-fart:
AVE WT/SURV CONTROL (&0 25 mg)
SURVIVAL IN HIGHEST (
)CONC
NUMBER OF REPLICATES
NUMBER OF ORGANISM/REPLICATE
NORMAL DISTRIBUTION?
HOMOGENEOUS VARIANCE?
NOEC METHOD
NOEC SURVIVAL
NOEC. REPRODUCTION/GROWTH
COMMENTS, p^-fy^c^. -Voy,<a^ -^-\- y^.irt^ u^r-^ "^I'-HH^ t^ cXr<c-^-A '^njt.^
OLVER
LABORATORIES
REFERENCE DATA SUM
PAGE
TESTING MONTH:
fc'Or^P.yn ZnQl
^J
ACU7 E TOX1CITY TEST RESULTS
REFERENCE TOXICANT: Spc^um C^Voq'Ae. CHRONIC TOX1CITY TEST RESU
TEST DATEfSI
TEST CONDITIONS TEST ORGANISM AGE DILUTION WATER SOURCE AERATION
Cerladaphnia
X/;u-/ifr?bl
/ ^M hones
EPA-MHW OLVER LABS
Conlinuous
Fathead Minnow
^-z-//(-/ol
i ^ -2.
EPA-MHW OLVER LABS
Continuous
.
TEST ORGANISM AGE DILUTION WATER
SOURCE AERATION
Ceriodap
EPA-M OLVER
continu
TEST ACCEPTABILITY CONTROL SURVIVAL (^90%)
i oo7.
loo'/
CONTROL SURVIVAL (&80%) NO OF CONTROL FEMALES
% CONTROL FEMALES WITH 3 BROODS (s60%)
AVE. NO. YOUNG/SURVIVING FEMALES (215)
STATISTICAL RESULTS
SURVIVAL IN 100% C Hi'jh*>+ llonC..)
LCso
f
95% C I METHOD
AVE WT/SURV CONTROL (z0 25 mg)
d/.
O'/.
1.\ 9/L
11.1 9/L
SURVIVAL IN HIGHEST (
)CONC
NUMBER OF REPLICATES
NUMBER OF ORGANISM/REPLICATE
/. 8 - 2.? 3/i. ;0.2.- /2.0^/
Pyx^;+
^ipcQfm-.r~y<.^V<-
NORMAL DISTRIBUTION? HOMOGENEOUS VARIANCE?
NOEC METHOD
NOEC SURVIVAL
NOEC REPRODUCTION/GROWTH
COMMENTS: R<.-ferc-nci -\^^\ u-H 4<i.-t-Y<^U i-K '^<^<.L^\^^ -H^_g.K^<--H d, ^-ck^^ e-s
OLVER
LABORATORIES
REFERENCE DATA SUM
PAGE
TESTING MONTH: ^CMCJ^ 7.00 I
REFERENCE TOXICANT: Soch'u^ CV^t.ri^'L
ACUTE TOXIC1TY TEST RESULTS
TESTDATEfSI
Cerlodaphnia
3)ib-^lp,lol
Fathead Minnow
3]zi- Zj^ilol
TEST CONDITIONS TEST ORGANISM AGE DILUTION WATER SOURCE AERATION
^ Z.4 VioufS EPA-MHW
OLVER LABS
^ Continuous
2 d-^S
EPA-MHW OLVER LABS
Continuous
TEST ACCEPTABILITY CONTROL SURVIVAL (i90%)
I OC.7.
I oo7.
STATISTICAL RESULTS SURVIVAL IN 100% (."'.Sh-t-t- C.WC-)
LCso
95% C I METHOD
o7,
!.(.3/L l-^ -I. 8 3;L
Pxb:4-
o7.
I). 4 3/L
lo.fc - IZ.z 3}i
CHRONIC TOXIC1TY TEST RESU Cerlodap
TEST ORGANISM AGE DILUTION WATER
SOURCE AERATION
i
CONTROL SURVIVAL (s80%) NO OF CONTROL FEMALES
% CONTROL FEMALES WITH 3 BROODS (i60%)
AVE NO, YOUNG/SURVIVING FEMALES (i 15)
AVE.WT/SURV CONTROL {i0 25 mg)
SURVIVAL IN HIGHEST (
)CONC
NUMBER OF REPLICATES
NUMBER OF ORGANISM/REPLICATE
NORMAL DISTRIBUTION'?
HOMOGENEOUS VARIANCE?
NOEC METHOD
NOEC SURVIVAL
NOEC REPRODUCTION/GROWTH
EPA-M OLVER L
continu
COMMENTS:
-^L
isLQ-
I o-APFi-200 1
TITLE:
Test Date
11/20/2000 01/19/2001 01/19/2001 01/22/2001 01/24/2001 02/14/2001 03/16/2001
Ceriodaphnia dubia Acute Test
Reference Toxicant Sodium Chloride
Test Name Mean
Mean+2SD Mean-2SD
LC50
1.73 2.48 2.48 1.68 1.53 2.14 1.55
2.11 2.23 2.09 1.98 2.01 1 94
3.17
310
2.99 2.90 2.84 2.78
1.04 1.36 1.20 1.06 1.17 1 10
OLVER LABORATORIES. INC
97
'Company "SanWzed. Does not contain TSCA CBt
lb-ADr-2001
Ceriodaphnia dubia Acute Control Chart
Sodium Chloride Reference Toxicant
8
7
6
;
STs
IS Z.
^
0 m
03
.2.
r^"
1
-----------------
^^------------^^-------------------------------- -
^^-------^-^^
^-----------
..
^^---,
-- i t 0
i
i
i
l
'
11/20/2000
01/19/2001
01/24/2001
03/16/2001
01/19/2001
01/22/2001
02/14/2001
LC50
------ Mean
------ Mean+2SD ------ Mean-2SD
OLVER LABORATORIES, INC
98 Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCACBa
I 6-APR-ZOO I
TITLE:
Test Date
11/20/2000 12/18/2000 12/19/2000 12/19/2000 12/20/2000 01/17/2001 02/14/2001 03/29/2001
FATHEAD MINNOW ACUTE TEST
Reference Toxicant. Sodium Chloride (o/U
Test Name
Mean
Mean+2SD Mean-2SD
LC50
11.7 9.9
108
12
11.4
11 4
11.1 11.4
10.80 10.80 11.10 11.16 11.20 11.19 11.21
13.35
.12.60 13.00 12.82 12.70 12.66 12.49
8.25 9.00 9.20 9.50 9.70 9.81 9.93
99 "Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
OI-VER LABORATORIES. INC
lo-Apr-2001
FATHEAD MINNOW Acute Control Chart
Sodium Chloride Reference Toxicant
11/20/2000 12/18/2000 12/19/2000 12/19/2000 12/20/2000 01/17/2001 02/14/2001 03/29/2001
LC50
Mean
Mean+2SD
Mean-2SD
OLVER LABORATOR.IES, INC
100 Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CB1
APPENDIX 9 CHRONIC REFERENCE TOXICITY TEST DATA
1 01
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CB1
OLVER
LABORATORIES
OLVER
LABORATORIES
REFERENCE DATA SUM
PAGE
TESTING MONTH: Jc\n^^s Z.OO I
REFERENCE TOXICANT: &odi'um_ C^T^C
TEST DATE(S)
ACUTE TOXIC1TY TEST RESULTS Cerlodaphnia Fathead Minnow
TEST CONDITIONS TEST ORGANISM AGE DILUTION WATER SOURCE AERATION
EPA-MHW OLVER LABS
.Continuous-
EPA-MHW OLVER LABS
Continuous
CHRONIC TOXIC1TY TEST RES
Cerlod
l/?-l/
TEST ORGANISM AGE DILUTION WATER
SOURCE AERATION
IB-"^
EPAOLVER
conti
TEST ACCEPTABILITY CONTROL SURVIVAL (2 90%)
CONTROL SURVIVAL (^80%) NO OF CONTROL FEMALES
% CONTROL FEMALES WITH 3 BROODS (^60%)
iUD 10
/ oo
AVE NO YOUNG/SURVIVING FEMALES (t15)
STATISTICAL RESULTS SURVIVAL IN 100%
LCso
,-
95% C I METHOD
AVE WT/SURV CONTROL (&0 25 mg)
SURVIVAL IN HIGHEST ( 4.o.3A.)CONC NUMBER OF REPLICATES NUMBER OF ORGANISM/REPLICATE NORMAL DISTRIBUTION? HOMOGENEO'US VARIANCE? NOEC METHOD NOEC SURVIVAL NOEC REPRODUCTION/GROWTH
(^^^^^^^^M P>g-<e-j-<.n^t- -\oy.>'c;-V>j -\-<..-4 r^s^VU W.TC i^rtVi'n -Tn<. ^xy<.i^<A r^nj<'.
^.
O
)0 1
Ye
J
S+t
2.0
O.Z
LABORATORIES
REFERENCE DATA SUM
PAGE
TESTING MONTH; f<.V>y^o,,rM 2pt?
^
REFERENCE TOXICANT: ^oi;u^ &V.\<.nlt.
A(;m1: TOXICI [Y TEST RESULTS
If!,; '.I-'''1'-:'!
Cerlodaphnia Fathead Minnow
IbSl CUNUIIIUNy TEST ORGANISM AGE DILUTION WATER SOURCE
AERATION
EPA-MHW OLVER LABS
Continuous
EPA-MHW OLVER LABS
Continuous
CHRONIC TOXICITY TEST RES
'
Certoda
2./-,^/
TEST ORGANISM AGE DILUTION WATER
SOURCE AERATION
1-8
EPA-M OLVER
conlin
TEST ACCEPTABILITY CONTROL SURVIVAL (a90%)
STATISTICAL RESULTS SURVIVAL IN 100%
LCso
.
95% C 1 METHOD
CONTROL SURVIVAL (iBO%) NO OF CONTROL FEMALES
% CONTROL FEMALES WITH 3 BROODS (^60%)
AVE NO YOUNG/SURVIVING
FEMALES (t 15)
AVE WT/SURV CONTROL {t0 25 mg)
SURVIVAL IN HIGHEST (3- /^JCONC
NUMBER OF REPLICATES NUMBER OF ORGANISM/REPLICATE NORMAL DISTRIBUTION? HOMOGENEOUS VARIANCE? NOEC METHOD NOEC SURVIVAL NOEC REPRODUCTION/GROWTH
loo (0
loo
2-7
O/
1 (
Y
y Dnnn
1.5 o.iq
COMMENTS- Rt-(<yLn<-- -+<>Xi'<-vVu -^r^- Y^l-oo\"lt--*> ^-it-r^. >-Mi''H^i/-> +^A. e-'^.WsA-si-A t-c^E.s.
OLVER
LABORATORIES
REFERENCE DATA SUM
PAGE
TESTING MONTH: Mo^L'n 2pt> I
REFERENCE TOXICANT: ^oj.'ur-A C^i-^-.'^^
ACU I E T UX1CI rY TEST RESULTS
il^l il.MI ;;;.
Cerlodaphnia Fathead Minnow
TEST CONDITIONS TEST ORGANISM AGE DILUTION WATER SOURCE AERATION
EPA-MHW OLVER LABS
Continuous
EPA-MHW OLVER LABS
Continuous
CHRONIC TOXICITY TEST RES
Cerloda
3/15-3/
TEST ORGANISM AGE DILUTION WATER
SOURCE AERATION
1-6
EPA-M OLVER
contin
TEST ACCEPTABILITY CONTROL SURVIVAL (290%)
STATISTICAL RESULTS SURVIVAL IN 100% LC 95% C 1 METHOD
COMMENTS: Ri4v^"<-*- -y'x^'\^ -\^\- i^^^ i^<.^.
CONTROL SURVIVAL (a80%) NO OF CONTROL FEMALES
% CONTROL FEMALES WITH 3 BROODS (a60%)
AVE NO YOUNG/SURVIVING FEMALES (215)
AVE WT /SURV CONTROL (a0 25 mg)
voi'-V^;^
SURVIVAL IN HIGHEST (^.o /^ )CONC NUMBER OF REPLICATES L NUMBER OF ORGANISM/REPLICATE NORMAL DISTRIBUTION? HOMOGENEOUS VARIANCE? NOEC METHOD NOEC SURVIVAL NOEC REPRODUCTION/GROWTH
----X^-. R^Au^/g-r^----------
-\V^. e-s-^^\'sV,<A Cof't-^-N \^I'VA
; oo 10
-70
'S.
O'/. 10
)
^
MO
S+K 2-
o.s
o.Z
I e-ApR-2001
TITLE:
Test Date
01/04/2001 01/22/2001 01/31/2001 02/05/2001 02/12/2001 03/14/2001
Test Name NOEC
2 2 2 2
1.25 2.5
Mode
Mode/0.5 Mode'0.5
2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
105
OLVER LAEOP.ATORIES, INC
Company Santtlzed. Does not contain TSCA CBI
lo-Apr-2001
FATHEAD MINNOW CHRONIC
SURVIVAL CONTROL CHART
8
7
a)
-a
,6;
i^ 0
55
E
3
'^4
03
!
'5)3
0
UJ
-02 2
1
.
--------------E--------------s--------------a------------------y------
^^
0
i
01/04/2001
01/22/2001
01/31/2001
02/05/2001
02/12/2001
03/14/2001
-m- NOEC ------ Mode
------ Mode/0.5 ------ Mode*0.5
Olver Laboratories, Inc
1 06
^^ ^A -^mpany
San^d. Does no,
CB(
1 e-ApR-zoo i
TITLE:
FATHEAD MINNOW CHRONIC-GROWTH
_________Reference Toxicant: Sodium Chloride (g/L)
Test Date
Test Name
Mode
Mode/O.S Mode'0.5
NO EC
01/04/2001 01/22/2001 01/31/2001 02/05/2001
2
2
2.00
2
200
5
2.00
4.00 4.00 4.00
1 00 1 00 1 00
02/12/2001
1.25
2.00
4.00
1.00
03/14/2001
1.25
2.00
4.00
1.00
107 'Company Sanitized. Does not conlain TSCA CBI
OLVE.R LABORATORIES, INC
16-Apr-2001
FATHEAD MINNOW CHRONIC
GROWTH CONTROL CHART
(u
-a
c b
i_ _o
5s
E
I4
w
'5)3
o
uj
-02,,
-B-
z
01/04/2001
01/22/2001
NOEC
01/31/2001
Mode
02/05/2001
02/12/2001
0.3,,/,1,4,,/2,0.,0,,1
Mode/0.5
Mode*0.5
Olver Laboratories, Inc.
108 Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CB1
I 6-APR-200 I
TITLE:
Test Date
12/01/2000 12/27/2000 01/03/2001 02/07/2001 03/15/2001
CER10DAPHN1A CHRONIC TEST_SURVIVAL
Reference Toxicant: Sodium Chloride (g/L)
Test Name
Mode
Mode/0 5
Mode'0 5
NOEC
2
1
2.00
2
2.00
1.5
2.00
2
2.00
4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
109
Ol-VE:R LABORATORIES, INC
'Company "Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
16-Apr-2001
CERIODAPHNIA CHRONIC
SURVIVAL CONTROL CHART
4
35
1 3
i
o
j
25
E
3
2
^ m 0)
^ '0)1 5
^x ^^^ 0
UJ
0
i 1
\^ Z
"^
/Bi--^
05
0
1
2
/
0
I1/2000 -- NO
E
I'
12/27/2000
C
------
M
I01/03/2001
ode
----
]' 02/07/2001
-- Mode/0.5 ----
'03/15
-- Mode*0.5
/
2
0
0
1
- Olver Laboratories, Inc
no
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CB1
I S-APR-200 I
TITLE:
CER10DAPHN1A CHRONIC TEST-Reproduction
_________Reference Toxicant: Sodium Chloride (g/L-l_
Test Date Test Name
Mode
Mode/0.5
Mode'0.5
Nnpf
12/01/2000
025
12/27/2000
0.25
0.25
0.50
0.13
01/03/2001 02/07/2001
0.25 0.19
0.25 0.25
0.50 0.50
0.13 0.13
03/15/2001
0.5
0.25
0.50
0-13
111
OLVER LABORATORIES INC
Comoany Sanitized. Docs nnt contain T8CA CB1
-lG-Apr-2001
CERIODAPHN1A CHRONIC
REPRODUCTION CONTROL CHART
2
1.5
as
~a
1 1
u
E
1 O5
CO
^ 'm
-0 - 0
iu
0 z
-0.5
i
----------HE
-1 12/01/2000
'
12/27/2000
B -----------------^- ^ ^ ^
Q1/03/2001
'
02^07/2001
03/15/2001
-- NOEC ------ Mode
------ Mode/0.5 ------ Mode*0.5
- Olver Laboratories, Inc.
112 Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBl
APPENDIX 10
DILUTION WATER QUALITY ANALYSES DATA
1i 1i 3
Company
->
Sanitized.
Does
not
contain
TSCA
CBI
/^>Ji WCTD' Consulting Engineers Environmental Laboratories
[^roRATORlES 1116 South Main Street Blacksburg, Virginia 24060
Client Sheet No.: Date: Client: Source: Shipping Information:
0004151
May 8,2000
Olver Laboratories Incorporated
Job No.: Date Received:
30001 4/12/00
Blacksburg, Virginia Delivered to Olver Laboratories Incorporated by Olver Personnel
Sample No.: Date Collected: Time Collected: Description:
123511 4/12/00 9 45 a m and 3:00 p m. EPA Moderately Hard Dilution Water
pH (Laboratory) (EPA 150 1) Alkalinity as CaCOa (EPA 3101) Conductivity (EPA 120.1) Tofal Cyanide (EPA 335 2) Ammonia as N (SM 4500 NH^.F) Nitrate as N (ERA 352.1) Nitnteas N (EPA 354 1) Hardness as CaCC^EPA 200 7) Total Phenols (EPA 420 1)
MDL = Minimum Detection Limit
N/A = Not Applicable
ND = Not Detectable
Result
809
60 317 NO ND ND ND 100 ND
mg/L ^mhos/cm
mg/L
MIU.
N/A 10
1 0
0005
0.1 0 1
001
1.
0005
mg/L pmhos/cm mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
Date/Time Anal yzed
4/12/00, 4/20/00, 5/02/00, 4/20/00, 4/17/00. 4/14/00, 4/14/00. 4/18/00, 4/24/00,
7 45 p m. 11 00a.m
10 45am
8 15am
6 00 p m. 3 00 p m. 1 30 p m.
5 00pm
1 10pm.
SAH ACC ACC DF SAH BCW SAH HT DF
All tests according to Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 18th Edition, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste (Physical/Chemical). 2r>d and 3rd Editions, and Methods for the Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. EPA
By ^BnAt R^it/cfhcey^^_(}_________
Laboratory Manager
Unless otherwise indicated. Ihis report sets forth Ihe results of our analysis of samples delivered lo our laboratory and shall nol be construed to be a representation by Oluer Laboratones Incorporated as to the source or method of procuring such samples All reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients and authonzalion (or publication of any statements contained in our reports is reserved pending our wntten approval
Blacksburg. VA (540) 552-6974
1 1 4
Page 1 of 6
N \OATA\LAB\3000nCLNTSH"nOOO-n51
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBl
OLVER
LABORATORIES
Client Sheet No Client Date
0004151 Olver Laboratories Incorporated
May 8,2000
Sample No.: Date Collected: Time Collected: Description:
123511 4/12/00 9 45 a.m and 3:00 p m. EPA Moderately Hard Dilution Water
Analysis
Total Aluminum (EPA 202 2) Dissolved Aluminum (EPA 202 2) Total Arsenic (EPA 200 9) Dissolved Arsenic (EPA 200 9) Total Cadmium (EPA 200 9) Dissolved Cadmium (EPA 200 9) Total Chromium III (EPA 200 9-SM 3500 Cr.D) Dissolved Chromium 111(EPA 200.9-SM 3500 Cr.D) Total Hexavalent Chromium (SM 3500 Cr.D) Dissolved Hexavalent Chromium (SM 3500 Cr D) Total Cobalt (EPA 200 9) Dissolved Cobalt (EPA 200 9) Total Copper (EPA 200 9) Dissolved Copper (EPA 200 9) Total Iron (EPA 236 2) Dissolved Iron (EPA 236 2) Total Lead (EPA 200 9) Dissolved Lead (EPA 200.9) Total Mercury (EPA 245 1) Dissolved Mercury (EPA 245.1) Total Nickel (EPA 200 9) Dissolved Nickel (EPA 200.9) Total Selenium (EPA 200 9) Dissolved Selenium (EPA 200 9) Total Sliver (EPA 200.9) Dissolved Silver (EPA 200.9) Total Zinc (EPA 200 7) Dissolved Zinc-(EPA 200 7) Pnonty Pollutant Organics-
Acid Compounds (EPA 625):
2-Cntoruphenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresoI
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2-Nltrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
p-Chloro-m-cresol Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2,4,6-Tnchlorophenol
Result
0 005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NO ND ND ND ND ND
0 006 0 006
NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
mg/L
mg/L mg/L
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ME1.
0003 0003 0001 0001 00001 00001 0001 0001 0005 0005 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 00002 00002 0001 0001 0002 0002 00002 00002 0005 0005
mo/L mg/L
mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
mg/L
10 Aig/1-
10 figiL 10 Aig/L 10 ^g/L 50 ^g/L 10 /tg/L
50 ^9/L 20 A'g/L 50 ^g/L 10 A'9/L
10 ."g/L
Date/Time Analyzed
5/02/00, 12.00 pm 5/02/00, 1200pm 4/25/00. 2:00 pm 4/25/00; 2-00 p m 4/20/00; 9.30 a m 4/20/00; 9 30 a m 4/20/00, 4 00 p m 4/20/00, 4 00 p m 4/13/00, t-3(Tpm 4/13/00,1 30pm 4/26/00, 3 00 p m 4/26/00, 3 00 p m 4/18/00,9 00pm 4/16/00:9 00pm 5/03/00:12 00 p m 5/03/00; 12 00 p m 5/01/00; 2 00 p m 5/01/00; 2 00pm 4/21/00; 9 00 a m
4/21/00; 9 00pm 4/16/00:7 30am 4/16/00; 7 30 am 4/17/00; 11.45 am 4/17/00. 11 45am 4/16/00; 5 00pm. 4/18/00; 5 00pm 4/22/00.11.-30 am 4/22/00; 11.30 am
4/26/00:7 56 am
*
Analyst
HT HT HT HT BN BN HT HT
SW
SAH HT HT HT/BN HT/BN HT HT HT HT BN BN BN BN BN BN HT HT BN BN
J5L
Page 2 of 6
N \DATA\LAB\30001\CLNTSH'noOO't 151
115 Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
OLVER
LABORATORIES
Client Sheet No Client Date
0004151
Olver Laboratories Incorporated
May 8,2000
Sample No-
Date Collected: Time Collected: Description:
123511 4/12/00 9 45 a m and 3 00 p m EPA Moderately Hard Dilution Water
Analysis
Priority Pollutant Orgarncs (continued) 'Base/Neutral Compounds (EPA 625)
Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzidine . Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene 3,4-Benzofluoranthene Ben2o(g,h.i)perylene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Bis(2-chloroethoxy)nnethane Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether Butyl Benzyl Phthalate 2-Chloronaphthalene 4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether Chrysene , Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 1.2-Dichloroben2ene 1.3-DichlQi-Dbenzene 1.4-Dichlorobenzene 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Diethyl Phthalate Dirnethyl Phthalate Di-n-Butyl Phthalate 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Di-n-Octyl Pnthalate 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine Fluoranthene Fluarene Hexachlorobenzene
Resutt
ND NO NO ND HD ND ND NO ND ND ND ND ND NO ND ND ND ND ND ND NO ND MD NO ND ND ND NO NO
N D NQ
ND ND
10 .ug/L
10 /^gA. 10 ^g/L 10 ug/L 10 ^igft. 10 ^g/L 10 ^g/L 10 ,ug/L 10 ^ig/L
10 ^ig/L 10 pg/L 10 ^ig/L
10 ^g/l_ 10 ^tgA. 10 A'9/L
10 ^g/L 10 ^g/L 10 ^g/L 10 ^g/L 10 ^g/L 10 ^g/L 10 ^g/L 20 ^ig/L
10 A'g/L 10 Atg/L
10 Atg/L
10 ^g/L 10 ,ug/L 10 ^gA. 10 ^igA10 ^g/L 10 ^g/L
10 MIL
Date/Time 4/28/00, 7 56 a m
Page 3 of 6
N \DATA\LAB\3000HCLNTSHT\0004151
11 fi
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CB1
OLVER
LABORATORIES
Client Sheet No Client Date
0004151 Olver Laboratories Incorporated
May 8,2000
Sample No.: Date Collected: Time Collected: Description:
123511 4/12/00 9-45 a m. and 3:00 p m. EPA Moderately Hard Dilution Water
Analysis
Result
Base/Neutral Compounds (EPA 625) (continued).
.
Hexachlorobutadiene
NO
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
ND
Hexachloroethane
ND
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
NO
Isophorone,
ND
Naphthalene
NO
Nitrobenzene
ND
N-Nrtrbso-dimethyfamine
ND
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
ND
N-Nilroso-diphenylamine
ND
Phenanthrene
ND
Pyrene
ND
1,2,4-Tnchlorobenzene
ND
MDL
10 HQl\-
10 ^g/L
10 A'g/L 10 A'9/L 10 ^g/L 10 ^g/L 10 fig/L 10 f^gfL 10 ^g/L 10 At9/L 10 ^g/L 10 ^g/L 10 A'g/L
Date/Time Analyzed
4/28/00, 7 56 a m
Page 4 of 6
N \OATA\Lft,B\30001 U:LNTSHT\0004151
1 17
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
OLVER
LABORATORIES
Client Sheet No Client Date
0004151 Olver Laboratories Incorporated May B, 2000
Sample No.: Date Collected: Time Collected: Description:
123511 4/12/00
9-45 am and 3 00 p.m.
EPA Moderately Hard Dilution Water
Analysis
Volatile Compounds (EPA 624)Acrolein Acrylonitnie
Benzene Bromodichltiromethane
Bromoform Bromo methane Carbon Tetrachlonde Chlorobenzene Chloroethane 2-ChlDroethyt Vinyl Ether
Chloroform Chloromethane Dibromochlorometha ne 1.1-Dichloroetnane 1.2-Dichloroethane 1.1-Dichloroetnene trans-1,2-DichloToetlTene 1.2-DiGhloropropane ci^-1,3-OichlorQpropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Methylene Chlonde sym-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethena Toluene 1.1.1-Tnchloroethane 1.1.2-Tnchloroethane Tnchloroethene TnchlorDfluorometha ne Vinyl Chlonde
Result
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
MDL
10 ug/L 10 ng!L
5 ^g/L 5 ^g/L 5 iiqlL 10 ^g/L tQ ^g/L 5 ^g/L 10 /^g/L 5 ^g/L 5 ^g/L 10 Aig/L 5 ^g/L 10 ^g/L 5 ug/L 10 /^g/L 10 Aig/L 5 /^g/L 5 ^g/L 5 ^g/L 5 pg/L 5 HQIL 5 ^g/L 5 pg/L 5 /2g/L 10 ^g/L 5 ^s/L 10 ^g/L 10 ^gA10 pg/L
Date/Time Analyzed
4/13/00. 4 06 p m
>.nalv BP
Page 5 of 6
N \DATA\LAB\30001\CI-NTSHTi0004151
1 18
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCACBI
OLVER
LABORATORIES
Clieni Sheet No Client Date
Sample No.:
Date Collected:
Time Collected:
Description:
Analysis
Pesticides {EPA 608)
.
Aldnn alpha-BHC beta-BHC delta-BHC gamma-BHC Chlordane 4,4'-DDD' 4,4'-DDE 4.4'-DDT Dieldnn Endosulfan I Endosulfan II Endosulfan Sulfata Endnn Endnn Aldehyde Heptachlor Heptachlor Epoxide Toxaphene PCBs (EPA 608) PCS-1016 PCB-1221 PCB-1232 PCS-1242 PCB-1248 PCB-1254 PCB-1260
0004151 Olver Laboratories Incorporated May 8, 2000
123511 4/12/00 9:45 a.m and 3 00 p m. EPA Moderately Hard Dilution Water
gesult
ND ND ND ND NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND NO ND
MDL
1 ngIL 1 ^g/L 1 A'g/L 1 ^g/L 1 ^g/L 1 ^ig/L 1 ^g/L 1 ^g/L 1 pg/L 1 figIL
1 WiL
1 ^g/L 1 pg/L 1 ^9/L 1 P8/L. 1 ^ig/L 1 ^g/L 1 pg/L
50 ^ig/L 50 pg/L 50 pg/L 50 ^ig/L 50 ^gA. 50 ^g/L 50 ^g/L
Date/Time 4/21/00. 9 26 p m
4/21/00. 9 26 p m
Page 6 of 6
1 19
N \DATA'>LAB\30001\CLNTSHT\00041 S 1
Company SgnHlzed. Ooes not contain TSCA CBI
/ ,
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
ly^^
OLVER
LABORATORIES
Consulting Engineers and Environmental Laboratories
{ n6 soulh Main street E^ksburg, Virginia . 24060 Telephone: (5'10) 552-6974-FAX: (540) 552-1715
+ Clicnl ihoutd complcle ill mfomialion leqilcilcd lojhe right and in llic unshaded ircu below. DO HOT WRITE IN THE SHADED AREAS
* Sunplcs will be discarded or iclumcd In the client two wctlii tiler the inalyticil report hu been
mailed,. un)c5i prior amncinc;ilj liavt been msdc
'^a.wi..
J-liT.^l'IJI'l.
.
)!>//
j '
Sample Location
(ic, innucnI.ouirnllOOl.MWl,
cic)
,
Dilc Colleclcd
Time Cfllltllcd
Client:
Olver Laboratories. Incorporat
Company Contact: Bioassnv Laboratory
Address: Telephone:.
.116 South Main Street. Black (540) 552-6974
Purchase Order No.
M
s ^, Sc.3
J
Srnplc
Conllncr Prcscrvallon
.0
a
Type
Type
n
V3
0 k.
0
EU u
t--
i3
0
=H:
/?35f/-Moi ~
- a!
^'2.
f5d5r ''3.
!
-5fl ^^
I
-Wl i,--^
-kJAZ. <-2
-K.OZ
--
GPA Modcrtllcy Hcsd Walcr EPA Moderallcy Hard Wilcr EPA Modcrtllcy Haid Walcr Et'A Moderallcy Hajd Walcr CPA Moderallcy Hard Waler GPA Moderallcy llBrd Water EPA Moderallcy Htrd Water
\ / - MC5 --
EPA Moderallcy Hard Walcr
4 i J M ^ ^ / .s.iin[ilf](;,l. (/Si)'ii.]i'.nc) i
RerinqyiSiliedB^' (Signalftc)
w N ^ - Re linquishedUy-(sgnalure)
Relinquislieci By (Signature)
%-L\00
'6->o0pr^
LEt Dlluiion Wller
PE
q^5cu^ mr DllBIIICT
PE
Wilo
Ws Ljb Dfluiion
PE
1 Orfn
Wiitt
^^ 6Am
Lib DIlulKKi W"ti
GL
Lil> Diluuon
FE
q^(^ '
Will
^^
Lib Dllullon Wuu
GL
3p0 ^
^n^rn \ /
Lib DllllHOB
PE
W.IB
Lib Dilutlfin
PE
Wlltr
Due Tune
w ^ Dilc Timt
Received By: (Signature)
F^Aj^jbc^^f
Received By; (Sigrrature)
Dale Time Received By (Signature)
i ^NaOH
1I,SO,/ N,S.O,
H,SO, UNO, HNO,
None
/
rpHpuictllni
) w*ia^^
/
Tolal Cyanid
(
/
Animonia
1
/
1
Tolal Phenol
/
To(alAI,Ai.C
1
Total Zn(lC
/
1
Tolal Mercu
^
nfi)^5Wc8?l%
1
ll-.-ttafl^.jy,^,^
/
1
DIss Al, As
Diss Zn(IC
Special In
Dale
Tirnc
4.1ZtfB
Dale
T'linc
Dale
Time
Temperatu
^il;ll|0^1 O <<,( 10
-i/n/p^u
Coiliiiien
^.Ajt. TT-f
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
^tSV
0 LVER
LABORATORIES
Consulting Engineers and Environmental Laboratories
S^^^g. }} ^6 south Main street'
Virginia 24060
Telephone: (540) 552-6974 FAX; (540) 552-1715
* Clicnl ihould complele ill mfDnmtion icqucslcd lo llie nghl uid in Ilic unshided >reai below DO NOT WRITE IN THE SHADED AREAS
* Simple! will be discinled or relumed la Ihc dicnl Iwa weeks iflcr Ihc inilyliml report hus been
nulled, unlcu pnor ananECfTlciils have been made
Client;_______Qlver Laboratories. Incorporat
Company Contact: Bioassav Laboratory
Address:
1116 South Main Street. Plack
Telephone:.
(540^ 552-6974
Purchase Order No.
Sample Location
(i c , influent, ouinill 001, MW1, etc)
s f^>
1
U
a
Dile
Time
U
Sxnipic
Container Prescrvalton
'S
^3
5
Collcclcd
Collcclcil
Type
Type
o rt ca
Q.
U
U
E
0
0
U %
EPA Motlcrmlcy Hard Walcr EPAMoilcrBllcyllMdWalcr EPAModcralleyIlariIWaler
%Z 00
a^ 1 ojm
Lib Dtlulion Wllei
GL
Lib Dilullon
OL
^- ^7-
WlItT
Lib Dilulian Wiiti
GL
None None HC1
/
(
Dissolved M
/
L
1'tloiny Pol
/
Z. P,! ill; Ml
Relinquished By. (Signature)
Due Time Received By: (Signature)
LLlLhs^L ^S
Dale Time RecervedBy.(SignalOre)
DaicTime I Received By: (Signature)
'-] > l.ll l
Dale Tune j
4,l&00|44^ . 1' I- "
-fflAA.
Dl;e rime | Mmlioil
0\\
Dale Time (.';;lillll'.'l
APPENDIX 11
CHEMICAL ANALYSES OF BRINE SHRIMP AND YCT FOOD MIXTURES
122 Company Sanitized. Dees not contain TSCA CB1
OLVER
LABORATORIES
1300 Blue Spruce Drive, Suite C Fort Collins, Colorado 80524
Toll Free: 800/331-5916 Tel: 970/484-5091 Fax:970/484-2514
SALMON STARTER #1
38-4763-91-50
PROCESS DATE: 07/26/00
GUARANTEED ANALYSIS
Crude Protein, Min Crude Fat, Mm....... Crude Fiber, Max....
55 0%
.15.0% ...2 0%
Toxic Metals afld Pesticide Analysis (Note: This analysis is on Lot 3/16/00) Performed by Energy Labs, Billings, MT
Aluminum
Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Mercury Nickel Silver Zinc
Total Metak Detection Limit
"S/g
5 5 1
a
5
3 3
5 1 5 5 5
Result "E/E
20
<5 <1 <5 <S 9 347 <S <1 <5 <5 103
EPA Methods Compound*
SCSI:
Oi-ganoctilonne Pesticides & 8082. Result Compound* "e/s
PCB's
Analysis
Repon
RESU LT
ug/g
Aldrin
alpha-BHC beta-BHC delta-BHC gamma-BHC (Lindane) alpha-Chlordane gamma-ChIordane
4,4'-DDD 4.4'-DDE 4,4' -DDT
Dieldnn Endosulfan I Endosulfan 11
Endosulfan sul-Tate Endnn Endrin aldehyde
<0.10
<0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.10 <0.20 <0.20
0.20
<0.20
Endrin ketone
Heptachlor Heptachlor eponde Methozychlor Chlordane (technical) Toxaphene Aroclor-1016 Aroclor-1221 Aroclor-1232 Aroclor-1242 Aroclor-1248 Aroclor-1254 Aroclor-1260 Aroclor-1262 Aroclor-1268
<0.20
<0.10 <0.10 <1.0 <l.O <10 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <Z.O <2.0
'Compound analyzed for but not detected.
INGREDIENTS
Fish Meal, Soy Flour, Com Gluten Meal, Blood Meal, Fish Oil, Liquid Fish Solubles, Torula Dried Yeast, Brewers Yeast, Soy Lecithin, Lignin Sulfonate, L-Ascorbyl-2-Polyphospbate (Vitamin C), Choline Chloride, Ethoxyqum (preservative), Canthaxanthin (pigrnenling agent). Vitamin B12 Supplement, Niacin, Calciurn Pantothenate, R-iboflavin, Pyndoxine Hydrochlonde, Vitarmn A Acetate, D-Activated Animal Sterol (souice of Vitamin D3), Thiainine Morionicrale, Folic Acid, Biolm, dI-Alpha Tocophero! Acetate (source of Vitamin E), Menadione (Vitamin K), Zinc Sulfate. Copper Sulfate, Majiganous Sulfale, Ethylencdiamuie Dihydroiodide, Cobalt Carbonate, Ferrous Sulfate, Calcium Carbonate
MANLTFACTUTUED BY: ZEIGLER BROS., INC. P.O. BOX 95, GARDNERS, PA 17324
Aquatic BioSystems, Inc
Quality Research Organisms
- 123 Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CB1
1300 Blue Spruce Drive, Suite C Fort Collins, Colorado 80524
Toll Free: 800/331-5916 Tel: 970/484-5091 Fax:970/484-2514
YTC TOTAL SOLIDS MEASUREMENT
(Method from EPA/5 05/8-89-002 a)
YTC Process Date: Average Total Solids
12/4/00: Best if used by 04/30/01
1760 mg/1
Ingredient T'"t Numbers 'Pines International Wheat Grass WG98S00090; Zeigler Salmon Starter#l: 38-4763-9150, Fleischmanns Yeast- G-3
Analyzed Metals
Aluminum
Arsenic
;
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Iron Lead
Mercury Nickel
Silver Zinc
EPA Required Toxic Metals
Report Limits
Results (me/L)
0.1
<0.1
0.005
<0.005
0.001
0.001
0.01
<0.01
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.18
0.01
<0.01
0.001
O.OOl
0.01 0.005 0.01
0.01 0.005
0.42
Compounds
Aldrin alpha-BHC beta-BHC delta-BHC Eamma-BHC fLmdane) alpha-Chlordane gamma-Chlordane
4,4"-DDD 4.4' - DDE 4,4' -DDT nieldrin
Endosulfan I EndosuUan n Eodosulfan sulfate Endrin Endrin aldehyde Endrin ketone Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxide Melhozychlor Chlordane (technical)
Toxaphene Aroclor-1016 Aroclor-1221 Aroclor-1232 Aroclor-1242 Arocior-1248 Aroclor-1254 Aroclor-1260 Aroclor-1262 Aroclor-1268
Results (ug/L)
<2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0 <2.0 <4.0
<-1.0
<4.0 <4.0 <4.Q <2.0 <2.0 <20 <20 <200 <40 <80 <40 <40 <40 <40 <40 <40
<40.
U - Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected '"Testing performed by Energy Labs, Billings, Montana
Qualilier
U - U
U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U
Aquatic BioSystems, Inc
Quality Research Organisms
Company SaAiJ'Aed.Does not contain TSCA Cfil
LABORATORIES
Consulting Engineers Environmental Laboratories 1116 South Main Street Blacksburg, Virginia 24060
Client Sheet No.: Date: Client: Source: Shipping Information:
0005275 July 11,2000
Job No.: Date Received:
60001 5/25/00
Olver Laboratories Incorporated
Blacksburg, Virginia Delivered to Olver Laboratories Incorporated by Olver Personnel
Sample No.:
Time Collected:
i
Date Collected:
Description:
Analysis
Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total
Aluminum (EPA 202.2) Arsenic (EPA 206 2) Cadmium (EPA 213 2) Chromium (EPA 218.2) Cobalt (EPA 219.2)
Cqaper (EPA 220 2) Iron (EPA 200.7) Lead (EPA 238 2) Mercury (EPA 245.1) Nickel (EPA 200 9) Silver (EPA 272 2)
Zinc (EPA 200.7)
124686
3:45 p m. 5/25/00
Tetramin Flakes (Lot No. 121599)
Result
MU [EEL
Date/"rime Anal'yzed
350 NO
0.0125 1 05
0.425 13.3 905
0275
ND
13
0.055
823
mg/kg as received ** mg/kg as received mg/kg as received mg/kg as received mg/kg as received mg/kg as received mg/kg as received
mg/kg as received mg/kg as received' mg/kg as received
312
0.15 0005
0.15 0.05
05 035
0.05 0.25
0.05 001
05
mg/kg as received"
mg/kg as received mg/kg as received mg/kg as received mg/kg as received mg/kg as received* mg/kg as received mg/kg as received* mg/kg as received mg/kg as received mg/kg as received mg/kg as received
6/27/00; 7/01/00: 6/19/00; 7/10/00; 6/29/00; 6/14/00; 6/22/00; 6/23/00; 7/05/00;
8 00 a m. 10.00 a-m.
11.30a.m. 1 30 p.m. 1.00 p m.
3.00 p m. 2.00 p m. 2.00 p m. 2:00 p m
7/05/00; 2:00 p.m
6/27/00; 3-00 p m. 6/27/00; 8:00 a m
Analyst
AMT BN ' AMT BN HT HT HT HT HT HT/BN HT AMT
MDL = Minimum Detection Limit
ND = Not Detectable * Sample required dilution; MDL was raised accordingly. "* Due to low spike recovery, the Method of Standard Additions was used to analyze this sample.
All tests according to Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 18th Edition, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste (Physical/Chemical). 2nd and 3rd Editions, and Methods for the Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. EPA.
By f^l^hlL.
Bnt Ritchey
/T
Laboratory Manager
Unless otherwise indicated, this report sets forth the results of our analysis of samples delivered to our laboratory and shall nol be construed to be a representation by Otver Laboratories Incorporated as to the source or method of procuring such samples. All reports are submitted as the confidential property of dienis and authorization for publication
of any statements contained in our reports is r&served pending ourwntten approval
Blacksburg, VA (540) 552-6974
pa9e 1 or'4
135
P\DATAIB10\60Q01\CLNTSHTUX)05275
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBI
OLVER
LABORATORIES
Client Sheet No . Client Date
Sample No.: Time Collected: Date Collected: Description:
Analysis
Pesticides (EPA 608)-
Aldnn
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
gamma-BHC ^ Chlordana
4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
Dieldnn Endosulfan I Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endnn
Endnn Aldehyde
Heptachlor
. Hepiacfator Epoxide
Toxaphene PCBs (EPA S08):.
PCB-1016
PCB-1221
PCB-1232
PCB-1242
PCS-1248
PCB-1254
PCS-1260
0005275 Olver Laboratories Incorporated July 11,2000
124686 3:45 p.m. 5/25/00 Tetramin Flakes (Lot No. 121599)
Result
ND ND ND NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
MQL
5 /^g/kg as received 5 ^g/kg as received 5 /^g/kg as received 5 ^g/kg as received 5 ^g/kg as received 50 /2g/kg as received 5 ^g/kg as received 5 ^g/kg as received 5 Aig/kg as received 5 /.g/kg as received 5 Afl/kg as received 5 ^g/kg as received 5 ^g/kg as received 5 Atg/kg as received 5 ^g/kg as received 5 ^g/kg as received 5 ^g/kg as received 50 ^g/kg as received
50 ^g/kg as received 50 ^g/kg as received 50 ^g/kg as received 50 /^g/kg as received 50 ^g/kg as received 50 /^g/kg as received 50 ^g/kg as received
Date/Time Analyzed 6/06/00; 5.56 a m.
6/06/00, 5:56 a.m
Analyst ASM/PMW
ASM/PMW
Page 2 of 4
126
P \OATAaiC60001\CLNTSHT\OOOS275
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCA CBl
OLVER
LABORATORIES
Client Sheet No Client Date
0005275 Olver Laboratories Incorporated July 11, 2000
Sample No.:
Time Collected:
Date Collected:
Description:
Analysis
Total Aluminum (EPA 202.2) Total Arsenic (EPA 206.2)
Total Cadmium (EPA 213.2) Total Chromium (EPA 200.9) Total Cobalt (EPA 219.2) Total Copper (EPA 220-2) Total Iron (EPA 200.7) Total Lead (EPA 239.2) Total Mercury (EPA 245.1) Total Nickel (EPA 200 9) Total Sliver (EPA 272 2) Total Zinc (EPA 200.7)
Pesticides (EPA 608): Aldnn
"
alpha-BHC beta-BHC delta-BHC ((anaHia-BHC Chlordane 4,4'-DDD 4,4'-DDE 4,4'-ODT Dieldnn Endosulfan I Endosulfan II Endosulfan Sulfate Endnn Endnn Aldehyde Heptachlor Heptachlor Epoxide Toxaphene PCBs (EPA 608): PCB-1016 PCS-1221 PCB-1232 PCB-1242 PCB-1248 PCB-1254 PCB-1260
124687 3:45 p.m. 5/25/00 TYC (Lot No. 51900)
Result
0.118 0.22 NO
0.004 ND
0 054
0.372 0.012
ND
0.004 ND
0.521
mg/L mg/L*'
mg/L
mg/L mg/L mg/L
mg/L
"
mg/L
ND ND ND ND
tiD
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Ml3J.
Date/Time Analysari
Analyst
0025
0.15 0.0001
0001
0.001 0.001 0.007
0.1 0.25 0.001 0.0002
0005
mg/L' mg/L' mg/L mg/L
mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L* mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
6/27/00; 8:00 a.m
AMT
7/01/00; 10:00 am.
BN
6/19/00; 11:30 am.
AMT
7/07/00; 11.30 am.
BN
6/29/00. 1:00 p.m.
HT
6/14/00; 3:00 p.m. - HT .
6/22/00; 2:00 p-m.
HT
6/23/00; 2:00 p m.
HT
6/26/00; 10.00am. 7/05/00: 2:00 p m. 6/27/00; 3.00 p m. 6/27/00; 8:00 a m.
AMT HT/BN HT AMT
6/06/00; 6.24 a m.
ASM/PMW
5 yg/kg as received
5 ^9/kg as received
5 ^g/kg as received
5 /ig/kg as received
5 /^g/kg as received
50 /'0/kg as received
5 yg/kg as received
5 ^g/kg as received
5 ^g/kg as received
5 ^9/kg as received
5 ^g/kg as received
5 ^g/kg as received
5 ^g/kg as received
5 M/kg as received
5 Aig/kg as received
5 ^g/kg as received
5 ^g/kg as received
50 ^g/kg as received 6/06/00; 6.24 a m.
ASM/PMW
50 ^g/kg as received
50 ^g/kg as received
50 ^g/kg as received
50 ^g/kg as received
50 ^g/kg as received
50 Aig/kg as received
"-
50 A's/kg as received
* Sample required dilution; MDL was raised accordingly. " Due to low spike recovery, the Method of Standard Additions was used to analyze this sample
Page 3 of 4
127
P \OATAIB)0\60001\CLMTSHT\000527S
Company Sanitized. Does not contain TSCACBI
OLVER
LABORATORIES
Client Sheet No Client Date
0005275 Olver Laboratories Incorporated July 11,2000
Sample No.: Time Collected: Date Collected: Description:
124688 5:00 p.m. 5/25/00 Brine Shrimp Nauplii (Lot No. 4400)
Analysis
"Total Aluminum (EPA 202.2) Total Arsenic (EPA 206.2) Total Cadmium (EPA 213 2) Total Chromium (EPA 200-9) Total Cobalt [EP/42W.2} Total Copper (EPA 220 2) Total Iron (EPA 200.7) Total Lead (EPA 239 2)
Total Mercury (EPA 2451)
Total Nickel (EPA 200.9) Total Sliver (EPA 272.2) Total Zinc (EPA 200.7)
Pesticides (EPA 608): Aldnn
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC - deftaWlC
gamma-BHC Chlordane
4,4'-ODD 4,4'-DDE 4.4'-DDT
Dieldnn Endosulfan I Endosulfan li Endosutfan Sulfate
Endnn Endnn Aldehyde Heptachlor Heptachlor Epoxide
Toxaphene PCBs (EPA 608).
PCB-1016 PCS-1221 PCB-1232 PCB-1242
PCS-1248 PCB-1254 PCB-1260
Result
0.007 0.08 ND
0 001 ND
0015
1.04 ND ND
0.003 ND
0 069
mg/L mg/L'
mg/L
mg/L mg/L
mg/L
"
mg/L
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND NO
MDL
Date/Time Analyzed '
Analyst
0.005 mg/L
'
0.15 mg/L'
0.0001 mg/L
0.001 mg/L
0.001 mg/L
0001 mg/L
0007 mg/L
0.1 mg/L'
025 mg/L
0.001 mg/L
0.0002 mg/L
0005 mg/L
5 f^g/kg as received 5 /^g/kg as received 5 ^g/kg as received 5 Aig/kg as received 5 ^g/kg as received 50 ^ig/kg as received 5 ^g/kg as received 5 /^g/kg as received 5 .ug/kg as received 5 Aig/kg as received 5 ^g/kg as received 5 ^ig/kg as received 5 ^g/kg as received 5 Aig/kg as received 5 A;g/kg as received 5 ^g/kg as received 5 ^ig/kg as received 50 fxg/kg as received
50 f^g/kg as received 50 ^ig/kg as received 50 ^ig/kg as received 50 ^g/kg as received 50 ^ig/kg as received 50 ^g/kg as received 50 /^g/kg as received
6/27/00:8 00 a.m. 7/01/00; 10.00 a.m 6/19/00, 11:30 a.m. 7/07/00: 11:30 a.m. 6/29/00, 1.00p.m. 6/14/00.3 00p.m. 6/22/00,2:00 p.m. 6/23/00,2.00 p m 6/26/00; 10:00 a m 7/05/00,2-00 p m 6/27/00.3 00 p.m 6/27/00; 8:00 a m 6/06/00; 6:53 a m.
6/06/00, 6 53 a.m
;.,
AMT BN AMT BN HT HT HT HT AMT HT/BN HT AMT ASM/PMW
ASM/PMW
* Sample required dilution; MDL was raised accordingly. " Due to low spike recover/, the Method of Standard Additions was used to analyze this sample.
Page 4 of 4
P M)ATA\BICA6000nCLNTSH'tM)Otl5275
128 Company Sanitized. Does not contain 7SCA CB1
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
^^?
OLVER
LABORATORIES
Consulting Engineers nnd nnviionmenta! Laboratories 1116 s0"111 Mai" strect' S'a^sburg, Virginia 24060 Telephone: (540) 552-6974 PAX: f540) 552-1715
* Clicnl l]uuM cuniplcic ill infoniialion tcqucilcd lo llie iiehl mil In Ilic unshidcil ircgi below
DONOTWRIKIH niCSIIADr.D AHUAS
* Sini)ilci mil be ilnciiJcil m rciumci) la ilic clicni iwo wcch incr Itic anilylicil repon his txcn niailrj, unicis p(lor irrjilgcnictlis liivc been niadc
CSiCCOS-Z-T- 5 Jubt to0t10\ Olver Sample Pll
11) H
S;ini|ilc Locnilon
(i c, innucnl, nuirallOOl, MW1, CIC)
Dale Callcclcd
'1 Illlt Collccliil
Client;--O^cr Labor^+or^s T^
J ^ " Company Contact: Bio^squ Lo^rft-WM- fer .
Address:___' .__________________
Telephone:.
Purchase Order No.
L.
s U
g a
J
*^
Sample
Container PrcicrvallDn
'K
^
Type
"1 ypc
M
a
0
L.
0
0.
U
U
5
0
0
U
%
^ ,^ul
f2^(,^
AfOl,
T<'t:r<^mio P)ckc5-
l~ot 'ZlSiq
'./
^^0
^pn
Fopi
So " 'i urd.
P1''*-CSCtH
A
^Oru,
^ t
^
1
i^' 1
-Ddd-J&^ Hi, AS.) cr F^i-hu'd
^ [Z^^^ -^/l
^0
iz4t,^2 , ^ -^P
TY<^ Food M|\4<Ar<.~
Lot 5;1oo
51-2-5/00
p^ -2'A'O
0
'5>r\m. S^TnVip Mo-upl;/-' Lo-f- Woo
\f
5(75/00 Soo pto-
/P
^c.
A^
A&-
MA ^on*.
^A
Mcxv-
v^'
!
L-^ 1
I^hL^'^
ft'i A5,Cr
P'^-Hl-tA
t/-- l 1^' 1
Tt)^\ t^t.+
Al, A5,C P&ih'u'
Sumplei(s) (Signnlnre)
.All^Nl ^ KCjiiiquis icj By (Si.v,iw{\\iv.)
- ! ^ ^ Z A^ l<.c1inc|iii.slicdDy\(Si a^ninc)
l^eliiniiiislicd Dy: (Sigmilinc)
.
Dale
IniiL.
^ i ^ D^lc TII^C
Rcccived Dy (Signntiirc)
^^f}^,'^'^ r^(- ^<a-^^--.
Ilccqi/cd Dy: (Si^iiiiturc)
^/
Pile Iline Received Dy: (SignnHire)
Special lu
^<i. 'vIViJ
Uali:
I line
^ / 3 ^ Dale
Tniic
Tcinpcrnliir Samples tra
Melliod o
n^ic
Coiiuncul