Document 3a0RNGBJEQ0pVGX5z94NZezx

DownloadRandom document
ARR&G_06US 2 Sa = UNITED STATESWEANSVHIIRNOGNTMOENN,DT.ACL.P2R0O4T6E0CTION AGENCY pry AUG 18 2000 Mr. Masanobu Yumoto Dainippon Ink & Chemicals, Inc. 1-3Takasago Takaishi-shi Osaka, Japan 592-0001 Dear Mr. Yumoto: FrevETNToInOoNSmFTEeASTNoIrCIEOESS MO g ? 32% 4 25 EL z 20 * -= In your `We received your June letter, you requested to 2m1e,e2t0w0i0thfatchseimAigleenccoyncceornncienrgnipnergfclruiotriocaolctuyslessuolffoPnFaOtSe(.PFYOoSu). noted water that and Dainippon Ink & oil repellent uses Chemicals Inc. (D.L.C.) has and some polymer additive decided to uses. You phase out also noted PFOS that a chemicals number of for for "critical uses" which may differ from your U.S. customers import PFOS-containing products uses 3M has discussed with the Agency. The Agency is prepared to work with industry, both manufacturers and users, to assist in review of critical visk/risk tradeoff usesof PFOS issues are pres to en teendsubryetthheatphgaosoedoudtecdiesciiosinosn.areThmeadAegeinnctyhowseelccaosemseswhtehree. and to hear your concerns for these uses of the opportunity to discuss this situation with you products and also to discuss`substitutes. As stated at the June 19 meeting at the American Chemistry Council (ACC), the Agency use of PFOS represents an unacceptable technology that believes that continued manufacture and should be eliminated to protect human health and the environment from potential severe long. term consequences. Based on available information, PFOS does not appear to break down in the. is a persistent chemical that can remain in the environment for a environment. This long time after it is means that it released. Recent information indicates that PFOS is much morewidespread in the environmentthan anyone hands kanndowanniomralexspaenctde,db.asPedFOonS th he ara esstulrs tosnogftreencdeennttcoyxtiocity accumulate in the tissues testing, could potentially of huma pose a risk to human health and the environment. EPA is currently examining appropriate regulatory alternatives necessary to protect human <hared health and the its information ewnivtihrootnhmeerntgoivnerlingmhetontfs,3Mi'nsc phaseout luding bri ndgeicnigsiiot ntoonthePFaOttSe.ntiEonPoAf has the also member statesofthe Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Contain NO CB! nendcysttle Peto tarmevtAdtdinsOF(rURLs + hpcpdaaeG.s00Hein25 Poston 1 2 Several countries, including the UK, the US, Canada, responsibility for an international data collection and and risk Japan, have agreed to share assessment effort, with an eye toward completion ofa preliminary sereening-level assessment by this fall to determine what further activities provided the OECD may wish to a copyofthis response take with regard to PFOS to government officials in chemicals. Japan. I have, as a courtesy, Ifyou would like to arrange a meeting to discuss these issues, please contact Ms. Karen Lannon at (202) 260-2797. Sincerely, ce: Yuho Shishiyama, MITI JAuRn2Y2o6shida, MHW Charles M. Auer Director Chemical Control Division Jontain NO CBI 2