Document 3QRjpVwdOgO6VJ1yjORONd4OO
January 10, 1983
Mr. E. W. Webb,
Ethyl Gasoline Corp.,
25 Broadway,
lew York City*
My dear Mr. Webb:-
A reply to the letter from Dr. Redden of the Red Cross is a little difficult to make, not because of any facts 'which would indicate that the use of Ethyl gasoline in the way mentioned is in any way dangerous, but because to suggest the use of Ethyl gasoline in the washing and treating of open wounds definitely interferes with our purpose of educating gasoline handlers against unnecessary skin contact with gasolines in general, and specifically with Ethyl gaso line*
1 do not believe it would be advisable for the Ethyl Gasoline Corporation to advise this procedure, not only because of this fact but also because there has been a very definite tendency (especially pronounced in recent months) to attribute certain types of dermatitis to the results of skin contact with Ethyl gasoline. I do not believe that there is a single fact to support this'conclusion; nevertheless, it has been done and probably will be done in the future. Furthermore, in spite of the fact that gasoline is capable of cleans ing greasy, open wounds, yet, it is also true that the continual ex posure to gasolines in general so damages the skin as to make It sus ceptible to superficial infection; and we have had a number of com plaints as a result of infected wounds of the skin of the hands, in which it was suggested that gasoline brought about the infection.
As for using Ethyl gasoline to wash the grease off the hands so as to cleanse, an open wound, I should not have the slight est hesitation in doing this myself for I think it would be a good pro cedure and would be very much better in aiding healing of the wound, than to leave the grease and grime on the skin. I would hesitate con siderably, however, in gliding this advice generally to workmen*
Ke 0001303
If I were phrasing a reply direct to Er. Redden, I should explain to him that there lias been a suspicion (which has not been verified by any facts) that the absorption of tetraethyl lead added to gasoline if handled carelessly, might in due time give rise to chronic lead poisoning; that in view of this suspicion careful investigations have been made among men and upon animals to determine whether or not there 13 any likelihood of thi3 occurrence; that no evidence whatever has been found that lead absorption in appreciable quantities occurs under these conditions; that, in spite of that fact, however, the Ethyl Gasoline Corporation has made it a matter of policy to educate gasoline handlers not to use Ethyl gasoline in cleansing tools or for any other purpose which brought about unnecessary contact of the skin with the gasoline, and that it looks with disfavor and
#2 Mr# E l Webb
January 10, 1928
discourages the use of Bthyl gasoline In the way suggested in his letter largely because encouragement of such procedure would tend to offset the attempts which had been made (not only by the Ethyl Gasoline Corporation, but'by the United States Public Health ^ervice) to educate gasoline handlers in the avoidance of any unneces sary contact not only with Ethyl gasoline but with materials which are intended purely for use as motor fuels#
If you do not wish to make your suggestion as strong
as I have outlined above, it will be a very simple matter merely to
set forth the facts and allow Dr Redden:to make whatever application
of them he chooses, on his own responsibility.
e I enclose here?<?lth Dr* Redden* s letter as per your
request.
"
Yours very truly,
GAEiEJ
Enel
0001304