Document 3QMEEXxVk2vKRa7r4ZE5dg95x
September 16, 1930
Mr. Robbins B* Stoeckel, Commissioner of Motor Vehicles* State of Connecticut, Department of Motor Vehicles, Hartford,. Conn.
Dear Mr. Stoeckel:
I wish to thank you very much indeed for your letter of September 8 with the information contained in it concerning the case of illness from the swallowing of Ethyl Gasoline.
The matter came to ray attention through the New York office of the Ethyl Gasoline Corporation. One of the men in the New York office quoted Mr. K. L. Bridges of the Standard Oil Company of New York, who had talked with you some days previously. Mr. Bridges had no knowledge of the nature of the case, and merely said that you were con* sidering the possibility of outlining an antidote for such a case of poisoning.
I am writing today to Dr. Hamant to ask for
the details of the case. Without in any way prejudicing
Dr. Hamant*s opinion, I think I should call to your atten
tion the fact that the swallowing of a small amount of
Ethyl Gasoline (such as a mouthful) would not be a serious
matter from the point of view of lead. It would take much
more than the quantity of lead in such an amount of gaso
line to produce symptoms of lead intoxication. However,
this amount of gasoline of any type would be expected to
produce definite symptoms which might even be serious, for
the.reason that the gasoline is exceedingly irritating to
the mucous membranes and might easily produce ulceration
of the stomach. Beoause of the common use of gasoline, and
because of the relative infrequency of injury from It we
are all too likely to forget,its toxicity, and I have been
somewhat surprised to find quite a number of Instances of
injury from gasoline which have been erroneously regarded
as Instances of lead Injury* I think it is fair to say in
this instance that any damage received by the Individual
was almost certainly due to the quantity of gasoline swal
lowed. . . -
In connection with the use of antidotes for such poisonings as might occur in connection with automo biles, I find it impossible to suggest much that Is likely to be of value to you. Much the most serious of such dan gers, obviously, is that of carbon monoxide poisoning. So much is known about this that I scarcely need comment upon
N22813
R.B.Stoeckel #2
/
it. Aa to the poisoning from gasoline, I should say that
generally speaking an Individual who swallows gasoline
usually regurgitates it rather quickly, and that if he
does not do so no known antidote is likely to be very
effective in preventing the development of illness. Ill
ness from swallowing gasoline is obviously not very common,
but illness from inhalation of gasoline is fairly frequent.
The treatment consists mainly in the avoidance of further
exposure, and so far aa I know there are no specific
remedies
'
Lead poisoning from the use of automobiles has not been seen. It is almost unthinkable that one should Ingest a sufficient amount of gasoline to produce lead Intoxication, and all of the information thus far obtained either experimentally or as the result of a number of years experience, indicates that the absorption of lead from the handling of lead-containing gasoline and from the exhaust gas is "appreciable* Therefore X cannot consider it advisable or necessary to suggest the use of an antidote for lead in connection with automobiles.
It is necessary also, of course, to consider the possibility of Benzol poisoning in connection with automobile fuels. The ingestion of Benzol gasoline in such a way as you have described the ingestion of Ethyl Gasoline, is entirely possible and I think, no doubt, has occurred frequently. The absorption of Benzol is a danger of some consequence, though it is much more likely to be dangerous when absorbed over a considerable period of time. X have never heard of an instance of acute Benzol poisoning, so to speak, from the swallowing of Benzol blends of gasoline* In the first place, one Is not likely to swallow any con siderable amount, and, just as in the case of Ethyl Gaso line, he is almost certain to regurgitate the greater por tion of that swallowed* The damage to the muoous membrane while not exactly Instantaneous, occurs very quickly and so far as X know cannot be avoided*
I should consider a very good treatment for the person who had swallowed gasoline, to be the washing out of the stomach quickly* If this could not be done, the Ingestlon of a considerable quantity of some bland oil, like a mineral oil, or the Ingestion of a considerable quantity of milk* The excess gasoline on the surface would be large ly absorbed by the oil, and somewhat less well by the milk,
K e 0021910
R. B* Stoeckel #3 and thus eliminated from the body with a minimal amount of damage to the alimentary tract*
Very truly yours,
RAKjEJ
Kt 00219M