Document 3Na8yNq5M6BxRGO9JjRK4GzyO

response to Interrogatory No. 6 state: (1) The type of business, conducted by such related company; (2) The past and present business relationship(s) between said related company and Defendant; (3) The nature of the products or services which Defendant has sold to, or purchased from, said related company; (4) Whether or not said related company advertises or has advertised products or services supplied by Defendant; (5) Whether or not said related company sells or has sold Defendant's products or services within the State of Illinois and, if so, the approximate value of those sales from 1930 to date; (6) Whether or not said related company pays taxes of any type to the State of Illinois or to any political subdivision thereof and, if so, the type of taxes paid; (7) Whether or not Defendant controls or has controlled, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, said related company's advertising; and, (8) The identity of any past or present officer or director of Defendant who, at any time, served as an officer or director of said related company. RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 7: See Abex's response to Interrogatory No. 10, below. INTERROGATORY NO. 8: List all directors and officers of Defendant from 1940 to date, and for each state all positions held and the date(s) during which each position was held. RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 8: See General Objections. Abex further objects to this request on the grounds that it is compound, vague, ambiguous, overly broad as to time and scope, unduly burdensome, irrelevant to any issue in this action and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible 8