Document 3N8kY214LY84qOrdNX8vb3a0n

Monsanto O lM*Mt tOCATtONl St LOlliS Ml May 6, 1968 " UBJICT AROCLOR RESIDUES IN FISH AND FOWL ~/k/b$ ncrtMNCi TO j C___E---Anacmnstopoulos -CANAG.i 1(4" E. S. Robson - EROBS rfir The attached letter should be of interest to both of you, inasmuch as I believe Aroclors are split between your two groups. It is another example of the widespread interest in what appears to be a rather insignificant phenomenon; namely, l-'VLO-the persistence of polychlorinated biphenyl in some species. As far as the Stanford Research Institute's proposition is concerned, I would be against our doing anything at this time. I think it would be wiser for us to find out what the Government is doing and see where we go from there. We will continue to follow this matter with any contacts we can establish. REK/ln att. HONS 09 7072